Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: April 2016

9 - Mann's globalizations and their limits

from Part II - Political, economic, military and ideological questions

Summary

Introduction

Debates about globalization have waxed and waned in the social sciences. They flourished briefly after the end of the Cold War and during the economic upswing of the 1990s and early 2000s (Guillen 2001) but have subsequently receded again. Still, the debate has been left unresolved: while some continue to build social theory around the concept of globalization (Martell 2010, Walby 2009), there have also been critics (Hirst and Thompson 1996). This leaves us with the question whether social theory now embraces globalization as a master concept, or if we should revert back to earlier concepts like modernization or ‘capitalism’ or move beyond all of these and on to new concepts?

In Volumes 3 and 4 of the Sources of Social Power, Mann makes a series of arguments about globalization which I will review and assess in this chapter. I will argue that his account of the increasingly global reach of social processes can explain some aspects of social development in the twentieth century but has serious limits when it comes to explaining recent social change, especially in the post–Cold War period. Mann's theory also puts too much emphasis on the driving force of capitalism and on America's global role in sustaining it and therefore overlooks a number of tensions in contemporary globalization. To make this argument, I will focus on Mann's ideas about American empire, technoscience and the environment and consumer citizenship.

Mann proposes that there are plural ‘globalizations’, by which he means that the processes of globalization among the economic, political, military and ideological sources of social power are orthogonal to each other; they are not causally related in a direct way. In contrast, I have argued for ‘globalizing modernity’ (Schroeder 2013), whereby cultural, economic and political processes have global dimensions, but there are also causal relations between them – even if they are indirect. This difference entails that I would like to criticize Mann's theory, in a constructive way, on several counts: first, I argue that technoscientific culture is a separate source of power and autonomous vis-à-vis nature, which also means that we differ on the looming crisis of climate change. Second, I argue that markets are more disembedded than Mann allows, with the implication that the global ideological and military role of the United States is less crucial to the future of capitalism.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Global Powers
  • Online ISBN: 9781316091166
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091166
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Collins, Randall. 2010. ‘Geopolitical Conditions of Internationalism, Human Rights, and World Law’, Journal of Globalization Studies, 1 (1): 29–45.
Cook, Michael. 2014. Ancient Religions, Modern Politics: The Islamic Case in Comparative Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dandeker, Christopher. 1990. Surveillance, Power and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
De Grazia, Victoria. 2005. Irresistible Empire: America's Advance through 20th-century Europe. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Gerth, Karl. 2010. As China Goes, So Goes the World. New York: Hill and Wang.
Giddens, Anthony. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Guillen, Mauro. 2001. ‘Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature’, Annual Review of Sociology, 21: 235–60.
Hall, John A. 2006. ‘Political Questions’, in Hall, John A. and Schroeder, Ralph (eds), An Anatomy of Power: The Social Theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–55.
Headrick, Daniel. 2010. Power over Peoples: Technology, Environments, and Western Imperialism, 1400 to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hirst, Paul and Thompson, Grahame. 1996. Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hobson, John. 2000. The State and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobson, John. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lundestad, Geir. 1986. ‘Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952’, Source: Journal of Peace Research, 23 (3): 263–77.
Maddison, Angus. 2007. Contours of the World Economy, 1–2030 AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Volume I: A History of Power from the Beginning to 1760 AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, Michael. 2011. Power in the 21st Century: Conversations with John A. Hall. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mann, Michael. 2012. The Sources of Social Power, vol.3: Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, Michael. 2013a. The Sources of Social Power, vol.4: Globalizations, 1945–2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, Michael. 2013b. ‘The End may be Nigh, but for Whom?’, in Wallerstein, Immanuel, Collins, Randall, Derluguian, Georgi and Calhoun, Craig (eds), Does Capitalism have a Future?’, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71–97.
Mann, Michael and Riley, Dylan. 2007. ’Explaining macro-regional trends in global income inequalities’, Socio-Economic Review, 5, 81–115.
Martell, Luke. 2010. The Sociology of Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
McNeill, John R. 2000. Something New under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World. New York: W. W. Norton.
Meyer, John; Boli, John; Thomas, George; Ramirez, Francisco. 1997. ‘World Society and the Nation-State’, American Journal of Sociology, 103 (1): 144–81.
Milanovic, Branko. 2011. The Haves and the Have-Nots: A Brief and Idiosyncratic Guide to Global Inequality. New York: Basic Books.
Norris, Pippa and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa and Inglehart, Ronald. 2009. Cosmopolitan Communication: Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rockstroem, Johan. et al. 2009. ‘A Safe Operating Space for Humanity’, Nature, 461: 472–75.
Schroeder, Ralph. 2007. Rethinking Science, Technology and Social Change. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Schroeder, Ralph. 2013. An Age of Limits: Social Theory for the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Slaughter, Ann-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stearns, P. 2001. Consumerism in World History: The Global Transformation of Desire. London: Routledge.
Tanzi, Vito and Schuhknecht, Ludger. 2000. Public Spending in the Twentieth Century: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walby, Sylvia. 2009. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. London: Sage.
Westad, Odd Arne. 2012. Restless Empire: China and the World since 1750. London: The Bodley Head.