Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:15:38.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Bunker states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Clement Moore Henry
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Robert Springborg
Affiliation:
Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California
Get access

Summary

The critical political weakness of the praetorian republics ruled physically or metaphorically from bunkers is that their states have little if any autonomy from traditional social forces that managed, typically during the turbulent nationalist phase that followed the end of colonial rule, to seize control of those states. Algeria's “deciders,” for example, represent political clans anchored in both society and state institutions. Muammar Qaddafi of Libya and Ali Abdullah Saleh of Yemen rule their countries through military/security/party structures that are in turn controlled by alliances of these leaders’ families and tribes. Although Saddam Hussein had relied heavily on tribes and tribal alliances to rule Iraq prior to 1991, after that time the weakening of the state apparatus resulted in a dramatic increase in tribal power and Saddam's reliance on it (Glain 2000; Jabar 2000). Confined to the Green Zone in Baghdad, the bunker liberated by the Americans for returning political exiles still relies on tribal alliances and sectarian militias to manage the fractured society. The same is true in Syria, where the Alawi sect, of which Syrian President Hafez al-Asad was a member, has come to control virtually all important state structures, although other Alawis have opposed the regime now led by Hafez's son Bashar (Perthes 1997: 181–4). In the Sudan, tribal alliances lurk behind General Omar Bashir's military organization and Hassan Turabi's National Islamic Front, reorganized in 2000 as an opposition party, the Popular National Congress.

In each of these cases except Algeria, the social forces that have penetrated and come to control the state are tribal or religious minorities, typically ones distrusted if not despised by much of the remainder of the population. Their rule is, therefore, seen by much, if not most of the population as being fundamentally illegitimate and intended to serve the interests of that social force, rather than the country as a whole. In these circumstances, coercion is necessarily the primary and, in some cases such as that of Iraq or in much of Sudan, virtually the only means by which government can ensure the public's compliance. In Algeria, 132 years of colonialism pulverized the social forces, but the national liberation struggle fostered new clans based on friends and cousins. The society is “‘folded’ into its State and vice-versa” without those blankets connoted by civil society (Jean Leca, foreword to Liverani 2008: xii).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bunker states
  • Clement Moore Henry, University of Texas, Austin, Robert Springborg, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California
  • Book: Globalization and the Politics of Development in the Middle East
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778162.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bunker states
  • Clement Moore Henry, University of Texas, Austin, Robert Springborg, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California
  • Book: Globalization and the Politics of Development in the Middle East
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778162.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bunker states
  • Clement Moore Henry, University of Texas, Austin, Robert Springborg, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California
  • Book: Globalization and the Politics of Development in the Middle East
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778162.008
Available formats
×