Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T16:40:49.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Monte Carlo studies of biological molecules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2021

David Landau
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Kurt Binder
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Germany
Get access

Summary

The combination of improved experimental capability, great advances in computer performance, and the development of new algorithms from computer science have led to quite sophisticated methods for the study of certain biomolecules, in particular of folded protein structures. One such technique, called ‘threading’, picks out small pieces of the primary structure of a protein whose structure is unknown and examines extensive databases of known protein structures to find similar pieces of primary structure. One then guesses that this piece will have the same folded structure as that in the known structure. Since pieces do not all fit together perfectly, an effective force field is used to ‘optimize’ the resultant structure, and Monte Carlo methods have already begun to play a role in this approach. (There are substantial similarities to ‘homology modeling’ approaches to the same, or similar, problems.) Of course, the certainty that the structure is correct comes primarily from comparison with experimental structure determination of crystallized proteins. One limitation is thus that not all proteins can be crystallized, and, even if they can, there is no assurance that the structure will be the same in vivo. Threading algorithms have, in some cases, been extraordinarily successful, but since they do not make use of the interactions between atoms it would be useful to complement this approach by atomistic simulations. (For an introductory overview of protein structure prediction, see Wooley and Ye (2007).) Biological molecules are extremely large and complex; moreover, they are usually surrounded by a large number of water molecules. Thus, realistic simulations that include water explicitly and take into account polarization effects are inordinately difficult. There have also been many attempts to handle this task by means of molecular dynamics simulations, but the necessity of performing very long runs of very large systems makes it very difficult to reach equilibrium. A possible advance is the use of so-called accelerated molecular dynamics (Miao et al., ), and it has been suggested that this may help to understand ‘genetic engineering’ mechanisms (Palermo et al., ). However, there are many phenomena that involve large spatial and temporal scales so that the use of coarse-grained models may often be necessary (Hyeon and Thirumalai, ).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bathe, M. and Rutledge, G. C. (2003), J. Comput. Chem. 34, 876.Google Scholar
Bernardi, A., Colombo, A., and Sanchez-Medina, I. (2004), Carbohydr. Res. 339, 967.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. and Xu, Y. (2005), Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinform. 62, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z. and Xu, Y. (2006), J. Bioinform. and Comput. Biol. 4, 317.Google Scholar
Endres, R. G. and Wingreen, N. S. (2006), Phys. Rev. E 68, 061921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, C., Wuest, T., Landau, D. P., and Xu, Y. (2009), J. Chem. Phys. 13, 215106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, H. and Guo, H. (2007), in Computational Methods for Protein Structure Prediction and Modeling, eds. Xu, Y., Xu, D., and Liang, J. (Springer Science Business Media, New York), vol. 2, p. 29.Google Scholar
Hansmann, U. H. E. (1997), Chem. Phys. Lett. 281, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, U. H. E. and Okamoto, Y. (1999) in Annual Reviews of Computational Physics VI, ed. Stauffer, D. (World Scientific, Singapore), p. 129.Google Scholar
Hu, J., Ma, A. and Dinner, A. R. (2005), J. Comput. Chem. 27, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyeon, C. and Thirumalai, D. (2011), Nature Commun. 2, 487.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, W. L. and Tirado-Rives, J. (1996), J. Phys. Chem. 100, 14508.Google Scholar
Lou, F. and Clote, P. (2010), Bioinformatics 26, 1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinke, J. H., Mohanty, S., Nadler, W., Zimmermann, O., and Hansmann, U. H. E. (2009), Eur. Phys. J. D 51, 33.Google Scholar
Miao, Y., Feher, V. A., and McCammon, J. A. (2015), J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nepal, M., Yaniv, A., Shafran, E., and Krichevsky, O. (2013), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 058102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northrup, S. H. and McCammon, J. A. (1980), Biopol. 19, 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, D. L., Gracheva, M. E., and Gunton, J. D. (2004), J. Chem. Phys. 120, 8292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palermo, G., Ricci, C. G., and McCammon, J. A. (2019), Physics Today (April) 72, 31.Google Scholar
Peng, Y. and Hansmann, U. H. E. (2003), Phys. Rev. E 68, 041911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrov, A. S., Douglas, S. S., and Harvey, S. C. (2013), J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 115101.Google Scholar
Shaknovich, E. (2006) in Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter: From Materials to Chemical Biology, eds. Ferrario, M., Ciccotti, G., and Binder, K. (Springer, Heidelberg), vol. 2, p. 563.Google Scholar
Stuike-Prill, R. and Pinto, B. M. (1995), Carbohydr. Res. 279, 59.Google Scholar
Urano, R., Kokubo, H., Okamoto, Y. (2015), J. Phys. Soc. Japan 84, 084802.Google Scholar
Urano, R. and Okamoto, Y. (2015), J. Chem Phys. 143, 235101.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Tree, D. R., and Dorfman, K. D. (2011), Macromolecules 44, 6594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooley, J. C. and Ye, Y. (2007), in Computational Methods for Protein Structure Prediction and Modeling, eds. Xu, Y., Xu, D., and Liang, J. (Springer Science Business Media, New York), vol. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
Yamauchi, M., Mori, Y., and Okumura, H. (2019), Biophys. Rev. 11, 457.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×