Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T18:00:10.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - The role of phonology in word recognition of Korean Hangul and Hanja

from Part II - Language processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Chungmin Lee
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Greg B. Simpson
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Youngjin Kim
Affiliation:
Ajou University, Republic of Korea
Ping Li
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

Orthographies in the world are substantially diverse in the way they represent phonology. In shallow orthographies such as Italian, Serbo-Croatian, and Korean Hangul the relationship between orthography and phonology is relatively regular. However, the relationship between print and sound is arbitrary and opaque in deep orthographies, including logographic Chinese, English and Hebrew. Written Korean uses both an alphabetic script, Hangul, and a logographic script, Hanja. Since Hangul and Hanja represent linguistic information in different forms, they provide an excellent opportunity to test whether universal or script-specific processes are utilized in word recognition of different scripts.

This chapter first reviews dual-route models of the role of phonology in visual word recognition, and then a brief description of Hangul and Hanja follows. Finally, empirical evidence will be presented to demonstrate different uses of phonology in the word recognition of Hangul and Hanja.

Two pathways in word recognition

There has been an ongoing question as to whether word recognition is based on the visual analysis of the input or mediated by phonology (Seidenberg, 1985). Dual-route models assume two possible pathways to the processing of a printed word (Coltheart, 1980; Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon & Ziegler, 2001). One is a direct lexical path, where access to meaning proceeds directly from orthography. The lexical route activates phonological information by matching orthographic input stimulus to a known word stored in an internal lexicon. The other is a phonologically mediated pathway, which goes from orthography to phonology, and then from phonology to meaning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×