Altmann, E.M., Trafton, J.G. (2004). Task interruption: resumption lag and the role of cues. Proc Ann Mtg Cog Sci Soc, 26. Available online at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18b4r66 (accessed November 16, 2017).Google Scholar

Andriole, K.P., Wolfe, J.M., Khorasani, R., Treves, S.T., Getty, D.J., Jacobson, F.L., Steigner, M.L., Pan, J.J., Sitek, A., Seltzer, S.E. (2011). Optimizing analysis, visualization, and navigation of large image data sets: one 5000-section CT scan can ruin your whole day. Radiology, 259(2), 346–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Balint, B.J., Steenburg, S.D., Lin, H., Shen, C., Steele, J.L., Gunderman, R.B. (2014). Do telephone call interruptions have an impact on radiology resident diagnostic accuracy? Acad Radiol, 21(12), 1623–1628.Google Scholar

Ball, K.K., Beard, B.L., Roenker, D.L., Miller, R.L., Griggs, D.S. (1988). Age and visual search: expanding the useful field, J Opt Soc Am, 5, 1–10.Google Scholar

Bertram, R., Kaakinen, J., Bensch, F., Helle, L., Lantto, E., Niemi, P., Lundbom, N. (2016). Eye movements of radiologists reflect expertise in CT study interpretation: a potential tool to measure resident development. Radiology, 281(3), 805–815.Google Scholar

Beyer, F., Zierott, L., Fallenberg, E.M., Juergens, K.U., Stoeckel, J., Heindel, W., Wormanns, D. (2007). Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader. Eur Radiol, 17(11), 2941–2947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burling, D., Halligan, S., Altman, D.G., Atkin, W., Bartram, C., Fenlon, H., Laghi, A., Stoker, J., Taylor, S., Frost, R., Dessey, G., De Villiers, M., Florie, J., Foley, S., Honeyfield, L., Iannaccone, R., Gallo, T., Kay, C., Lefere, P., Lowe, A., Mangiapane, F., Marrannes, J., Neri, E., Nieddu, G., Nicholson, D., O Hare, A., Ori, S., Politi, B., Poulus, M., Regge, D., Renaut, L., Rudralingham, V., Signoretta, S., Vagli, P., Van der Hulst, V., Williams-Butt, J. (2006). CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol, 16(8), 1745–1749.Google Scholar

Cavanagh, P. (1987). Reconstructing the third dimension: interactions between color, texture, motion, binocular disparity, and shape. Comput Vision, Graph Image Process, 37(2), 171–195.Google Scholar

Cooper, L., Gale, A., Darker, I., Toms, A., Saada, J. (2009). Radiology image perception and observer performance: how does expertise and clinical information alter interpretation? Stroke detection explored through eye-tracking. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 7263, 72630K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coughlin, B.F., Seltzer, S.E., Swensson, R.G., Judy, P.F. (1992). Practices and attitudes about cathode-ray tube-based and film-based image interpretation. J Digit Imag, 5(1), 50–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diaz, I., Schmidt, S., Verdun, F.R., Bochud, F.O. (2015). Eye-tracking of nodule detection in lung CT volumetric data. Med Phys, 42(6), 2925–2932.Google Scholar

Dreizin, D., Munera, F. (2012). Blunt polytrauma: evaluation with 64-section whole-body CT angiography. Radiographics, 32(3), 609–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Drew, T., Evans, K., Võ, M.L.-H., Jacobson, F.L., Wolfe, J.M. (2013a). Informatics in radiology: what can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images? Radiographics, 33(1), 263–274.Google Scholar

Drew, T., Vo, M.L.-H., Olwal, A., Jacobson, F., Seltzer, S.E., Wolfe, J.M. (2013b). Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images. J Vision, 13(10), 1–13.Google Scholar

Drew, T., Võ, M.L.-H., Wolfe, J.M. (2013c). The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers. Psychol Sci, 24(9), 1848–1853.Google Scholar

Duncan, J., Humphreys, G.W. (1989). Visual-search and stimulus similarity. Psychol Rev, 96(3), 433–458.Google Scholar

Ebner, L., Tall, M., Choudhury, K.R., Ly, D.L., Roos, J.E., Napel, S., Rubin, G.D. (2017). Variations in the functional visual field for detection of lung nodules on chest computed tomography: impact of nodule size, distance, and local lung complexity. Med Phys, 44(7), 3483–3490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edelman, R.R. (2014). The history of MR imaging as seen through the pages of radiology. Radiology, 273(2 Suppl), S181–S200.Google Scholar

Ellis, S.M., Hu, X., Dempere-Marco, L., Yang, G.Z., Wells, A.U., Hansell, D.M. (2006). Thin-section CT of the lungs: eye-tracking analysis of the visual approach to reading tiled and stacked display formats. Eur J Radiol, 59(2), 257–264.Google Scholar

Evans, K.K., Birdwell, R.L., Wolfe, J.M. (2013). If you don’t find it often, you often don’t find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening. PLoS One, 8(5), e64366.Google Scholar

Fishman, E.K., Ney, D.R., Heath, D.G., Corl, F.M., Horton, K.M., Johnson, P.T. (2006). Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why. RadioGraphics, 26(3), 905–922.Google Scholar

Ghekiere, O., Lesnik, A., Millet, I., Hoa, D., Guillon, F., Taourel, P. (2007). Direct visualization of perforation sites in patients with a non-traumatic free pneumoperitoneum: added diagnostic value of thin transverse slices and coronal and sagittal reformations for multi-detector CT. Eur Radiol, 17(9), 2302–2309.Google Scholar

Godoy, M.C.B., Kim, T.J., White, C.S., Bogoni, L., de Groot, P., Florin, C., Obuchowski, N., Babb, J.S., Salganicoff, M., Naidich, D.P., Anand, V., Park, S., Vlahos, I., Ko, J.P. (2013). Benefit of computer-aided detection analysis for the detection of subsolid and solid lung nodules on thin- and thick-section CT. AJR, 200(1), 74–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Halligan, S., Mallett, S., Altman, D.G., McQuillan, J., Proud, M., Beddoe, G., Honeyfield, L., Taylor, S.A. (2011). Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study. Radiology, 258(2), 469–476.Google Scholar

Helbren, E., Halligan, S., Phillips, P., Boone, D., Fanshawe, T.R., Taylor, S.A., Manning, D., Gale, A., Altman, D.G., Mallett, S. (2014). Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three dimensional environment: a study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography. Br J Radiol, 87(1037), 20130614.Google Scholar

Helbren, E., Fanshawe, T.R., Phillips, P., Mallett, S., Boone, D., Gale, A., Altman, D.G., Taylor, S.A., Manning, D., Halligan, S. (2015). The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography. Eur Radiol, 25(6), 1570–1578.Google Scholar

Horowitz, T.S. (2017). Prevalence in visual search: from the clinic to the lab and back again. Jpn Psychol Res, 59(2), 65–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hu, C.H., Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Krupinski, E.A., Toto, L.C. (1994). Searching for bone fractures: a comparison with pulmonary nodule search. Acad Radiol, 1(1), 25–32.Google Scholar

Huang, H.K. (2011). Short history of PACS. Part I: USA. Eur J Radiol, 78(2), 163–176.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A. (1996). Influence of experience on scanning strategies in mammography. Proc SPIE, 2712, 1–8.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Berger, W.G., Dallas, W.J., Roehrig, H. (2003). Searching for nodules: what features attract attention and influence detection? Acad Radiol, 10(8), 861–868.Google Scholar

Krupinski, E.A., Tillack, A.A., Richter, L., Henderson, J.T., Bhattacharyya, A.K., Scott, K.M., Graham, A.R., Descour, M.R., Davis, J.R., Weinstein, R.S. (2006). Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides. Implications for medical education and differences with experience. Hum Pathol, 37(12), 1543–1556.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L. (2015). Visual search and lung nodule detection on CT scans. Radiology, 274(1), 14–16.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F. (1975). Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology, 116(3), 527–532.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., La Follette, P.S. (1972). Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. Radiology, 103(3), 523–528.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Carmody, D. (1978). Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol, 13(3), 175–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Thickman, D., Toto, L. (1987). Searching for lung nodules. A comparison of human performance with random and systematic scanning models. Invest Radiol, 22(5), 417–422.Google Scholar

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Krupinski, E.A. (1989). Searching for lung nodules. Visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions. Invest Radiol, 24(6), 472–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Conant, E.F., Weinstein, S.P. (2007) Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study 1. Radiology, 242(2), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsson, L., Nystrom, M., Andersson, R., Stridh, M. (2015) Detection of fixations and smooth pursuit movements in high-speed eye-tracking data. Biomed Sig Proc Control, 18, 145–152.Google Scholar

Larsson, L., Nystrom, M., Ardo, H., Astrom, K., Stridh, M. (2016). Smooth pursuit detection in binocular eye-tracking data with automatic video-based performance evaluation. J Vision, 16(15), 20.Google Scholar

Mallett, S., Phillips, P., Fanshawe, T.R., Helbren, E., Boone, D., Gale, A., Taylor, S.A., Manning, D., Altman, D.G., Halligan, S. (2014). Tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal three-dimensional CT colonography: visual perception of experienced and inexperienced readers. Radiology, 273(3), 783–792.Google Scholar

Manning, D., Ethell, S., Donovan, T., Crawford, T. (2006). How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules. Radiography, 12(2), 134–142.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, H., Terao, Y., Yugeta, A., Fukuda, H., Emoto, M., Furubayashi, T., Okano, T., Hanajima, R., Ugawa, Y. (2011). Where do neurologists look when viewing brain CT images? An eye-tracking study involving stroke cases. PLoS One, 6(12), e28928.Google Scholar

McConkie, G.W., Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Percep Psychophys, 17(6), 578–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, R.J., Schwartz, K.M., Eckel, L.J., Diehn, F.E., Hunt, C.H., Bartholmai, B.J., Erickson, B.J., Kallmes, D.F. (2015) The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload. Acad Radiol, 22(9), 1191–1198.Google Scholar

Mital, P.K., Smith, T.J., Hill, R.L., Henderson, J.M. (2011) Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion. Cogn Comput, 3(1), 5–24.Google Scholar

Napel, S., Rubin, G.D., Jeffrey, R.B. (1993). STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. JCAT, 17(5), 832–838.Google Scholar

Nodine, C.F., Mello-Thoms, C., Kundel, H.L., Weinstein, S.P. (2002). Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. AJR, 179(4), 917–923.Google Scholar

Paik, D.S., Beaulieu, C.F., Jeffrey, R.B., Rubin, G.D., Napel, S. (1998). Automated flight path planning for virtual endoscopy. Med Phys, 25(5), 629–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Phillips, P., Boone, D., Mallett, S., Taylor, S.A., Altman, D.G., Manning, D., Gale, A., Halligan, S. (2013). Method for tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal 3D CT colonography: technical description and proposed metrics for analysis. Radiology, 267(3), 924–931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pickhardt, P.J. (2003). Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. AJR, 181(6), 1599–1606.Google Scholar

Potter, M.C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187(4180), 965–966.Google Scholar

Ratwani, R.M., Wang, E., Fong, A., Cooper, C.J. (2016). A human factors approach to understanding the types and sources of interruptions in radiology reading rooms. J Am Coll Radiol, 13(9), 1102–1105.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D. (2000). Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol, 36(2), 74–80.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D. (2003). 3-D imaging with MDCT. Eur J Radiol, 45, S37–S41.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D. (2014). Computed tomography: revolutionizing the practice of medicine for 40 years. Radiology, 273(2 Suppl), S45–S74.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D. (2015). Lung nodule and cancer detection in computed tomography screening. J Thorac Imag, 30(2), 130–138.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D., Krupinski, E.A. (2017). Tracking eye movements during CT interpretation: inferences of reader performance and clinical competency require clinically realistic procedures for unconstrained search. Radiology, 283(3), 920.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D., Beaulieu, C.F., Argiro, V., Ringl, H., Norbash, A.M., Feller, J.F., Dake, M.D., Jeffrey, R.B., Napel, S. (1996). Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology, 199(2), 321–330.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D., Shiau, M.C., Schmidt, A.J., Fleischmann, D., Logan, L., Leung, A.N., Jeffrey, R.B., Napel, S. (1999). Computed tomographic angiography: historical perspective and new state-of-the-art using multi detector-row helical computed tomography. JCAT, 23(Suppl 1), S83–S90.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D., Sedati, P., Wei, J.L. (2009). Postprocessing and data analysis. In: Rubin, G.D., Rofsky, M.R. (eds.) CT and MR Angiography. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/ Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 197–251.Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D., Harrawood, B., Napel, S., Roos, J. E., Choudhury, K. R., Ebner, L. (2015a). The moment of recognition: method and analysis of gaze behavior in the search for lung nodules in CT scans. Available online at: archive.rsna.org/2015/15047526.html (accessed November 11, 2017).Google Scholar

Rubin, G.D., Roos, J.E., Tall, M., Harrawood, B., Bag, S., Ly, D.L., Seaman, D.M., Hurwitz, L.M., Napel, S., Roy Choudhury, K. (2015b). Characterizing search, recognition, and decision in the detection of lung nodules on CT scans: elucidation with eye tracking. Radiology, 274(1), 276–286.Google Scholar

Seltzer, S.E., Judy, P.F., Adams, D.F., Jacobson, F.L., Stark, P., Kikinis, R., Swensson, R.G., Hooton, S., Head, B., Feldman, U. (1995). Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. Radiology, 197(1), 73–78.Google Scholar

Shen, Y.J., Jiang, Y.V. (2006). Interrupted visual searches reveal volatile search memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perform, 32(5), 1208–1220.Google Scholar

Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.Google Scholar

Solomon, J., Marin, D., Roy Choudhury, K., Patel, B., Samei, E. (2017). Effect of radiation dose reduction and reconstruction algorithm on image noise, contrast, resolution, and detectability of subtle hypoattenuating liver lesions at multidetector CT: filtered back projection versus a commercial model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm. Radiology, 284(3), 777–787.Google Scholar

Straub, W.H., Gur, D., Good, W.F., Campbell, W.L., Davis, P.L., Hecht, S.T., Skolnick, M.L., Thaete, F.L., Rosenthal, M.S., Sashin, D. (1991). Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment. Radiology, 178(3), 739–743.Google Scholar

Suwa, K., Furukawa, A., Matsumoto, T., Yosue, T. (2001). Analyzing the eye movement of dentists during their reading of CT images. Odontology, 89(1), 54–61.Google Scholar

Tall, M., Choudhury, K.R., Napel, S., Roos, J.E., Rubin, G.D. (2012). Accuracy of a remote eye tracker for radiologic observer studies: effects of calibration and recording environment. Acad Radiol, 19(2), 196–202.Google Scholar

Trafton, J.G., Altmann, E.M., Brock, D.P. (2005). Huh, what was I doing? How people use environmental cues after an interruption. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Ann Meet, 49(3), 468–472.Google Scholar

Venjakob, A.C., Mello-Thoms, C.R. (2016). Review of prospects and challenges of eye tracking in volumetric imaging. J Med Imag Int Soc Optic Phot, 3(1), 011002.Google ScholarPubMed

Waite, S., Kolla, S., Jeudy, J., Legasto, A., Macknik, S.L., Martinez-Conde, S., Krupinski, E.A., Reede, D.L. (2017). Tired in the reading room: the influence of fatigue in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol, 14(2), 191–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Westbrook, J.I., Woods, A., Rob, M.I., Dunsmuir, W.T.M., Day, R.O. (2010). Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med, 170(8), 683–690.Google Scholar

Williams, L.H., Drew, T. (2017). Distraction in diagnostic radiology: how is search through volumetric medical images affected by interruptions? Cogn Res: Princ Implic, 2(1), 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfe, J.M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon Bull Rev, 1(2), 202–238.Google Scholar

Wolfe, J.M., Horowitz, T.S., Van Wert, M.J., Kenner, N.M., Place, S.S., Kibbi, N. (2007). Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen, 136(4), 623–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolfe, J.M., Evans, K.K., Drew, T., Aizenman, A., Josephs, E. (2016). How do radiologists use the human search engine? Radiat Protect Dosim, 169(1–4), 24–31.Google Scholar

Young, A.H., Hulleman, J. (2013). Eye movements reveal how task difficulty molds visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perf, 39(1), 168–190.Google Scholar

Yu, J.-P.J., Kansagra, A.P., Mongan, J. (2014). The radiologist’s workflow environment: evaluation of its disruptors and potential implications. J Am Coll Radiol, 11(6), 589–593.Google Scholar