Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T13:18:13.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - The Product-Mix Auction: A New Auction Design for Differentiated Goods

from Part III - Alternative Auction Designs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

By
Paul Klemperer
Edited by
Martin Bichler  and
Jacob K. Goeree
Paul Klemperer
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Oxford
Martin Bichler
Affiliation:
Technische Universität München
Jacob K. Goeree
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Get access

Summary

The “Product-Mix Auction” is a single-round auction that can be used whenever an auctioneer wants to buy or sell multiple differentiated products. So potential applications include spectrum sales, and selling close-substitutes “types” of energy, as well as applications in finance such as the one discussed below.

The Product-Mix Auction effectively takes multiple single-round auctions that are each for (many units of) a single variety of the good, and combines all these auctions into one auction. Bidders express their relative preferences between varieties, as well as for alternative quantities of specific varieties, in simultaneous “sealed bids”. All the information from all the bids is then used, in conjunction with the auctioneer's own preferences, to set all the prices and the total quantities of all the goods allocated.

The Product-Mix Auction is like the “simultaneous multiple-round auction” (SMRA) in that both auctions find competitive equilibrium allocations consistent with the preferences that participants express in their bids. However, the Product-Mix Auction has several advantages over the SMRA. It is (obviously) much faster than an SMRA's iterative process (for example, the UK's 3G mobile-phone SMRA auction took 150 rounds over seven weeks), and it is therefore also simpler to use and less vulnerable to collusion. Moreover, unlike a standard SMRA, it allows the auctioneer as well as the bidders, to specify how the relative quantities of the different varieties to be sold should depend on their relative prices.

I invented the auction at the beginning of the financial crisis, in response to the 2007 Northern Rock bank run–Britain's first bank run since the 1800's. The Bank of England has used it regularly and successfully since, to improve its allocation of funds to banks, building societies, etc. In the Bank's auction, the different “types of goods” are loans of funds secured against different types of collateral, and the “prices” are interest rates, that is, the interest rate a borrower pays depends on the quality of the collateral it offers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Spectrum Auction Design , pp. 462 - 476
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausubel, L., and Cramton, P. (2008). ‘A Troubled Asset Reverse Auction’. Mimeo: University of Maryland.
Ausubel, L., Cramton, P., Filiz-Ozbay, E., Higgins N., Ozbay, E. and Stocking, A. (2008). ‘Common- Value Auctions with Liquidity Needs: An Experimental Test of a Troubled Assets Reverse Auction’. Working Paper: University of Maryland.
Back, K., and Zender, J. (2001). ‘Auctions of Divisible GoodsWith Endogenous Supply’. EconomicsLetters, 73: 29–34.Google Scholar
Baldwin, E., and Klemperer, P. (2012). ‘New Geometric Techniques to Analyse Demand’. Mimeo: Oxford University.
Baldwin, E., and Klemperer, P. (2015). ‘Understanding Preferences: “Demand Types”, and the Existence of Equilibrium with Indivisibilities’. Working Paper: Oxford University.
Baldwin, E., and Klemperer, P. (in prep.). ‘The multi-dimensional product-mix auction’.
Bank of England (2010). ‘The Bank's new indexed long-term repo operations’. Bank of EnglandQuarterly Bulletin, 50/2: 90–91.
Bank of England (2011). ‘The Bank's indexed long-term repo operations’. Bank of England QuarterlyBulletin, 51/2: 93.
Binmore, K. and Klemperer, P. (2002). ‘The Biggest Auction Ever: the Sale of the British 3G Telecom Licenses’. Economic Journal, 112: C74–C96.Google Scholar
Budish, E. (2004). ‘Internet Auctions for Close Substitutes’. M.Phil Thesis: University of Oxford.
Crawford, V.P. (2008). ‘The Flexible-Salary Match: A Proposal to Increase the Salary Flexibility of the National Resident Matching Program’. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66/2: 149–60.Google Scholar
Crawford, V.P., and Knoer, E.M. (1981). ‘Job Matching with Heterogeneous Firms and Workers’. Econometrica, 49: 437–50.Google Scholar
The Economist. “A golden age of micro”. The Economist, Free Exchange w.w.w.economist.com/ blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/microeconomics. October 19, 2012.
Fisher, P. (2011). ‘Recent developments in the sterling monetary framework’. www.bankofengland. co.uk/publications/speeches/2011/speech487.pdf
Fisher, P., Frost, T., and Weeken, O. (2011). ‘Pricing central bank liquidity through product-mix auctions–the Bank of England's indexed long-term repo operations’.Working Paper: Bank of England.
Frost, T., Govier, N., and Horn, T. (2015). ‘Innovations in the Bank's provision of liquidity insurance via indexed long-term repo (ILTR) operations’. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 55/2: 181–188.Google Scholar
Gul, F. and Stacchetti, E. (1999). ‘Walrasian Equilibrium with Gross Substitutes’. Journal of EconomicTheory, 87: 95–124.Google Scholar
Kelso, A. S. Jr., and Crawford, V.P. (1982). ‘Job Matching, Coalition Formation, and Gross Substitutes’. Econometrica, 50: 1483–1504.Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. (1999). ‘Auction Theory’. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13/2: 227–86. [Also reprinted in The Current State of Economic Science, (1999). S. Dahiya, ed. 711–66.]Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. (2002). ‘What Really Matters in Auction Design’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16: 169–89.Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. (2004). Auctions: Theory and Practice, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Klemperer, P. (2008). ‘A New Auction for Substitutes: Central Bank Liquidity Auctions, the U.S. TARP, and Variable Product-Mix Auctions’. Mimeo: Oxford University.
Klemperer, P. and Meyer, M, (1986). ‘Price Competition vs. Quantity Competition: The Role of Uncertainty’. Rand Journal of Economics, 17: 618–38.Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. and Meyer, M. (1989). ‘Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty’. Econometrica, 57: 1243–77.Google Scholar
Kremer, I. and Nyborg, K. (2004). ‘Underpricing and Market Power in Uniform Price Auctions’. Review of Financial Studies, 17: 849–77.Google Scholar
Krishna, V. (2002). Auction Theory, Academic Press: New York.
McAdams, D. (2007). ‘Uniform-Price Auctions with Adjustable Supply’. Economics Letters, 95: 48–53.Google Scholar
Manelli, A. M. and Vincent, D. (1995). ‘Optimal ProcurementMechanisms’. Econometrica, 63: 591–620.Google Scholar
Menezes, F. M. and Monteiro, P.K. (2005). An Introduction to Auction Theory, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Milgrom, P.R. (2000). ‘Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction’. Journal of Political Economy, 108: 245–72.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P.R. (2004). Putting Auction Theory to Work, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Milgrom, P.R. (2009). ‘Assignment Messages and Exchanges.’ American Economic Journal:Microeconomics, 1: 95–113.Google Scholar
Milnes, A. (2010). “Creating Confidence in Cash”. Blueprint, October.
Poole, W. (1970). ‘Optimal Choice of Monetary Policy Instruments in a Simple Stochastic Macro Model’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84: 197–216.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. (1974). ‘Prices vs. Quantities’. Review of Economic Studies, 41: 477–91.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×