Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-2c8nx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T08:02:28.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - A review of quality issues associated with studying hard-to-survey populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

By
Lars Lyberg ,
Mathew Stange ,
Janet Harkness ,
Peter Mohler ,
Beth-Ellen Pennell  and
Lilli Japec
Edited by
Roger Tourangeau ,
Brad Edwards ,
Timothy P. Johnson ,
Kirk M. Wolter  and
Nancy Bates
Lars Lyberg
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
Mathew Stange
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Janet Harkness
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Peter Mohler
Affiliation:
University of Mannheim
Beth-Ellen Pennell
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Lilli Japec
Affiliation:
Statistics Sweden
Roger Tourangeau
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Brad Edwards
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Timothy P. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Kirk M. Wolter
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Nancy Bates
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Some populations/groups are defined as hard to survey (H2S) in the research literature because of difficulty sampling the population, accessing the population, contacting members of the population, persuading them to participate, and interviewing group members (see Tourangeau, Chapter 1 in this volume). Reviewing the literature on populations referred to as “hard to survey” indicates the types of studies undertaken with these populations, the survey error challenges, and the methodological solutions used by researchers who study such populations. The H2S literature, however, does have limitations and research gaps exist.

The problems that complicate obtaining high-quality data from H2S populations are diverse and often interrelated. This review uses a quality assurance and quality control framework to discuss the total survey error associated with H2S studies. The discussion is based on an extensive systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative literature related to H2S, as well as our own experiences surveying these populations. (For a discussion and definition of kinds of H2S populations and the characteristics that earn them the H2S label, see Chapter 1 in this volume.)

Type
Chapter
Information
Hard-to-Survey Populations , pp. 82 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agustín, L. M. (2007). Questioning solidarity: outreach with migrants who sell sex. Sexualities, 10(4), 519–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andresen, E. M., Diehr, P. H., & Luke, D. A. (2004). Public health surveillance of low-frequency populations. Annual Review of Public Health, 25(1), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, B. (2003). The young men’s clinic: addressing men’s reproductive health and responsibilities. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35(5), 220–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, S. E., Melnick, S. L., Preston-Martin, S., Weber, K., Kalish, L. A., Miotti, P., et al. (1998). The women’s interagency HIV study. Epidemiology, 9(2), 117–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertrand, J. T., Seiber, E., & Escudero, G. (2001). Contraceptive dynamics in Guatemala: 1978–1998. International Family Planning Perspectives, 27(3), 112–18,136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethlehem, J., Cobben, F., & Schouten, B. (2011). Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biemer, P., & Lyberg, L. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, J., & Czaja, R. (1982). Locating a special population using random digit dialing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46(4), 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccia, D., Guthmann, J.-P., Klovstad, H., Hamid, N., Tatay, M., Ciglenecki, I., et al. (2006). High mortality associated with an outbreak of Hepatitis E among displaced persons in Darfur, Sudan. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 42(12), 1679–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodenmann, P., Vaucher, P., Wolff, H., Favrat, B., de Tribolet, F., Masserey, E., et al. (2009). Screening for latent tuberculosis infection among undocumented immigrants in Swiss healthcare centres: a descriptive exploratory study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 9, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouchard, F. (2007). A capture–recapture model to estimate the size of criminal populations and the risks of detection in a marijuana cultivation industry. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(3), 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, D. J., & Boehmer, U. (2007). The lack of cancer surveillance data on sexual minorities and strategies for change. Cancer Causes & Control, 18(4), 343–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, C. F., & Rosasco, A. M. (1999). The margin has many sides: diversity among gay and homosexually active men in Lima. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 1(3), 261–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callan, L. B. (1971). Adapting the windshield survey model to community health education. HSMHA Health Reports, 86(3), 202–03.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canales, S., Ganz, P. A., & Coscarelli, C. A. (1995). Translation and validation of a quality of life instrument for Hispanic American cancer patients: methodological considerations. Quality of Life Research, 4(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canvin, K., Bartlett, A., & Pinfold, V. (2005). Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on supervised discharge and guardianship. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(8), 457–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaturvedi, N., & McKeigue, P. M. (1994). Methods for epidemiological surveys of ethnic minority groups. Journal of Epidemiological & Community Health, 48, 107–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chavez, E. L., Edwards, R., & Oetting, E. R. (1989). Mexican American and white American school dropouts’ drug use, health status, and involvement in violence. Public Health Reports, 104(6), 594–604.Google ScholarPubMed
Chavez, L. R., Hubbell, F. A., Mishra, S. I., & Valdez, R. B. (1997). Undocumented Latina immigrants in Orange County, California: a comparative analysis. International Migration Review, 31(1), 88–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherry, D. J., & Rost, K. (2009). Alcohol use, comorbidities, and receptivity to treatment in Hispanic farmworkers in primary care. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 20(4), 1095–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coady, M. H., Weiss, L., Galea, S., Ompad, D. C., Glidden, K., & Vlahov, D. (2007). Rapid vaccine distribution in nontraditional settings: lessons learned from project VIVA. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 24(2), 79–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coe, C., Gibson, A., Spencer, N., & Stuttaford, M. (2008). Sure start: voices of the hard-to-reach. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34(4), 447–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Coleman, S. M., Rajabiun, S., Cabral, H. J., Bradford, J. B., & Tobias, C. R. (2009). Sexual risk behavior and behavior change among persons newly diagnosed with HIV: the impact of targeted outreach interventions among hard-to-reach populations. AIDS Patient Care & STDs, 23(8), 639–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correa-Velez, I., & Gifford, S. M. (2007). When the right to be counted doesn’t count: the politics and challenges of researching the health of asylum seekers. Critical Public Health, 17(3), 273–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E., Couper, M. P., Janz, N. K., Caldwell, C. H., & Resnicow, K. (2010). Interviewer effects in public health surveys. Health Education Research, 25(1), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Leeuw, E. D. (2008). Choosing the method of data collection. In de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A. (eds.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology (pp. 113–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, E., Hox, J., & Kef, S. (2003). Computer-assisted self-interviewing tailored for special populations and topics. Field Methods, 15(3), 223–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, Mail and Mixed Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (3rd edn.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dowrick, C., Gask, L., Edwards, S., Aseem, S., Bower, P., Burroughs, H., et al. (2009). Researching the mental health needs of hard-to-reach groups: managing multiple sources of evidence. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draus, P. J., Siegal, H. A., Carlson, R. G., Falck, R. S., & Wang, J. (2005). Cracking the cornfields: recruiting illicit stimulant drug users in rural Ohio. Sociological Quarterly, 46(1), 165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, E., Golub, A., & Johnson, B. D. (2003). Transient male–female relationships and the violence they bring to girls in the inner city. Journal of African American Studies, 7(2), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, K., & Fuller, J. (1991). Health education and ethnic minorities: needs may differ, the techniques don’t. BMJ, 302(6780), 802–03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennett, S. T., Bailey, S. L., & Federman, E. B. (1999). Social network characteristics associated with risky behaviors among runaway and homeless youth. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Errante, A. (1997). Close to home: comparative perspectives on childhood and community violence. American Journal of Education, 105(4), 355–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faugier, J., & Sargeant, M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(4), 790–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feild, L., Pruchno, R. A., Bewley, J., LemayJr., E. P., & Levinsky, N. G. (2006). Using probability vs. nonprobability sampling to identify hard-to-access participants for health-related research: costs and contrasts. Journal of Aging and Health, 18(4), 565–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanagan, S. M., & Hancock, B. (2010). “Reaching the hard to reach” – lessons learned from the VCS (voluntary and community sector). A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 92–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, W. L., Weiss, G., Kipke, M. D., Ritt-Olson, A., Iverson, E., & Lopez, D. (2009). The Healthy Young Men’s Study: sampling methods to recruit a random cohort of young men who have sex with men. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 21(4), 357–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FowlerJr., F. J., & Mangione, T. W. (1990). Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-related Error. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredriksen-Goldsen, K., & Hooyman, N. R. (2005). Caregiving research, services, and policies in historically marginalized communities: where do we go from here?Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 18(3), 129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freimuth, V. S. (1995). Mass media strategies and channels: a review of the use of media in breast and cervical cancers. Wellness Perspectives, 11(2), 79.Google Scholar
Garland, J., Spalek, B., & Chakraborti, N. (2006). Hearing lost voices. British Journal of Criminology, 46(3), 423–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geringer, W., Marks, S., Allen, W., & Armstrong, K. (1993). Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to condom use and STDs in a high risk population. Journal of Sex Research, 30(1), 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, P., Shah, M., & Bertozzi, S. (2005). Risky business: the market for unprotected commercial sex. Journal of Political Economy, 113(3), 518–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, S., & Salganik, M. J. (2010). Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(15), 6743–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenfields, M. (2009). Reaching Gypsies and Travellers. Primary Health Care, 19(8), 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Collard, A., & Begum, N. (2005). Sharing stories: complex intervention for diabetes education in minority ethnic groups who do not speak English. BMJ, 330(7492), 628–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, R. M., FowlerJr., F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Groves, R., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error: past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, R., & McGonagle, K. (2001). A theory-guided interviewer training protocol regarding survey participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 17(2), 249–65.Google Scholar
Han, H.-R., Kang, J., Kim, K. B., Ryu, J., & Kim, M. (2007). Barriers to and strategies for recruiting Korean Americans for community-partnered health promotion research. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 9(2), 137–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harkness, J. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In Harkness, J. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Mohler, P. Ph. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Survey Methods (pp. 35–56). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Harkness, J. A., Villar, A., & Edwards, B. (2010). Translation, adaptation, and design. In Harkness, J. A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T. P., Lyberg, L., Mohler, P. Ph., Pennell, B-E., & Smith, T. W. (eds.), Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts (pp. 117–40). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckathorn, D. (2007). Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: analyzing continuous variables and controlling for differential recruitment. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, K. J., Pollack, D. M., & Friedman, S. M. (1992). A neonatal hepatitis B surveillance and vaccination program: New York City, 1987 to 1988. American Journal of Public Health, 82(6), 885–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hidaka, Y., & Operario, D. (2006). Attempted suicide, psychological health and exposure to harassment among Japanese homosexual, bisexual or other men questioning their sexual orientation recruited via the internet. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(11), 962–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, D. L., O’Reilly, K., Tashima, N., Crain, C., Beeker, C., Goldbaum, G., et al. (1996). Using formative research to lay the foundation for community level HIV prevention efforts: an example from the AIDS community demonstration projects. Public Health Reports, 111(Suppl. 1), 28–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Hogue, A., Johnson-Leckrone, J., & Liddle, H. A. (1999). Recruiting high-risk families into family-based prevention and prevention research. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 21(4), 337.Google Scholar
Horwitz, R. H., Roberts, L. W., & Warner, T. D. (2008). Mexican immigrant women’s perceptions of health care access for stigmatizing illnesses: a focus group study in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 19(3), 857–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hossain, Z. (2001). Division of household labor and family functioning in off-reservation Navajo Indian families. Family Relations, 50(3), 255–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Icard, L. D. (2008). Reaching African-American men on the “down-low”: sampling hidden populations: Implication for HIV prevention. Journal of Homosexuality, 55(3), 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, L. G., Trummal, A., Lohmus, L., & Ravalepik, A. (2009). Efficacy of convenience sampling through the internet versus respondent driven sampling among males who have sex with males in Tallinn and Harju County, Estonia: challenges reaching a hidden population. AIDS Care, 21(9), 1195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, L., & Allebone, B. (1999). Researching “hard-to-reach” groups: the crucial role of the research associate. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(4), 353–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalton, G. (2003). Practical methods for sampling rare and mobile populations. Statistics in Transition, 6(4), 491–501.Google Scholar
Kalton, G. (2009). Methods for oversampling rare subpopulations in social surveys. Survey Methodology, 35(2), 125–41.Google Scholar
Kalton, G., & Anderson, D. W. (1986). Sampling rare populations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 149(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D. B. (1991). The social demography of drug use. Milbank Quarterly, 69(3), 365–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Koné, A., Sullivan, M., Senturia, K. D., Chrisman, N. J., Ciske, S. J., & Krieger, J. W. (2000). Improving collaboration between researchers and communities. Public Health Reports, 115(2/3), 243–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, M. S., Mudaliar, S., & Daniels, D. (1998). Community-based outreach HIV intervention for street-recruited drug-users in Madras, India. In Needle, R. H., Coyle, S., & Cesari, H. (eds.), HIV prevention with drug-using populations – current status and future prospects. Public Health Reports, 113(Suppl. 1), 58–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Landry, P. F., & Shen, M. (2005). Reaching migrants in survey research: the use of the global positioning system to reduce coverage bias in China. Political Analysis, 13(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansky, A., Abdul-Quader, A. S., Cribbin, M., Hall, T., Finlayson, T. J., Garfein, R. S., et al. (2007). Developing an HIV behavioral surveillance system for injecting drug users: the national HIV behavioral surveillance system. Public Health Reports, 122(Suppl. 1), 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laporte, R. E. (1994). Assessing the human condition: capture–recapture techniques: allows accurate counts of those difficult to reach populations. BMJ, 308(6920), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavelle, B., Larsen, M. D., & Gundersen, C. (2009). Strategies for surveys of American Indians. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessler, J. T., Eyerman, J., & Wang, K. (2008). Interviewer training. In de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A. (eds.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology (pp. 442–60). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Loosveldt, G. (2008). Face-to-face interviews. In de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A. (eds.), International handbook of survey methodology (pp. 201–20). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lyberg, L., & Biemer, P. (2008). Quality assurance and quality control in surveys. In de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A. (eds.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology (pp. 421–441). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lyberg, L., & Couper, M. (2005). The use of paradata in survey research. Invited paper presented at the ISI Meeting, Sydney, April.Google Scholar
MacKellar, D. A., Gallagher, K. M., Finlayson, T., Sanchez, T., Lansky, A., & Sullivan, P. S. (2007). Surveillance of HIV risk and prevention behaviors of men who have sex with men: a national application of venue-based, time-space sampling. Public Health Reports, 122(Suppl. 1), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, J. M., Tortu, S., Torres, L., Pouget, E. R., & Hamid, R. (2003). Recruitment of heterosexual couples in public health research: a study protocol. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3, 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J. L., Wiley, J., & Osmond, D. (2003). Social networks and unobserved heterogeneity in risk for AIDS. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(1), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
O’Hegarty, M., Pederson, L. L., Thome, S. L., Caraballo, R. S., Evans, B., Athey, L., et al. (2010). Customizing survey instruments and data collection to reach Hispanic/Latino adults in border communities in Texas. American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1), S159–S164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pauw, I., & Brener, L. (2003). “You are just whores: you can’t be raped”: barriers to safer sex practices among women street sex workers in Cape Town. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5(6), 465–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennell, B-E., Levenstein, R., & Lee, H. J. (2011). Cross-Cultural Survey Guidelines. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Retrieved from .Google Scholar
Pettifor, J. L. (1979). Ethical issues with special populations. Canadian Psychological Review/Psychologie Canadienne, 20(3), 148–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salganik, M. J., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 193–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroepfer, T., Matloub, J., Creswell, P., Strickland, R., & Anderson, D. (2009). A community-specific approach to cancer research in Indian Country. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 3(4), 317–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaver, F. M. (2005). Sex work research: methodological and ethical challenges. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(3), 296–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, T. W. (2003). Developing comparable questions in cross-national surveys. In Harkness, J. A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Mohler, P. Ph. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Survey Methods (pp. 69–92). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Spreen, M., & Zwaagstra, R. (1994). Personal network sampling, outdegree analysis and multilevel analysis: introducing the network concept in studies of hidden populations. International Sociology, 9(4), 475–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stueve, A., O’Donnell, L. N., Duran, R., San Doval, A., & Blome, J. (2001). Time-space sampling in minority communities: results with young Latino men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 91(6), 922–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Sudman, S., Sirken, M., & Cowan, C. (1988). Sampling rare and elusive populations. Science, 240, 991–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toktaş, S. (2006). The conduct of citizenship in the case of Turkey’s Jewish minority: legal status, identity, and civic virtue aspects. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 26(1), 121–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. A. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: the impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlahov, D., Coady, M. N., Galea, S., Ompad, D. C., & Barondess, J. A. (2007). Pandemic preparedness and hard to reach populations. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 2(6), 281–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Vyavaharkar, M. V., Moneyham, L., & Corwin, S. (2008). Health care utilization: the experiences of rural HIV-positive African American women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 19(1), 294–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×