Policy deployment across borders: a framework for work–life initiatives in multinational enterprises

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511488498.008

7 - Policy deployment across borders: a framework for work–life initiatives in multinational enterprises

from Part II - Policy design, implementation, and deployment

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Paula Caligiuri

Anne Bardoel and

Helen De Cieri

Edited by

Steven A. Y. Poelmans

Show author details

Paula Caligiuri: Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Anne Bardoel: Affiliation:
Associate Professor Monash University, Australia
Helen De Cieri: Affiliation:
Professor and Director Monash University, Australia
Steven A. Y. Poelmans: Affiliation:
IESE Business School, Barcelona

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The difficulties of balancing work and family life are experienced all over the world. For managers in multinational enterprises (MNEs), it is imperative to define a global work–life strategy that establishes shared principles and guidelines and also allows for local initiatives and differences. Although there are a number of common issues faced by working women and men and their families, a global work–life strategy needs to balance shared concerns with a course of action that is appropriate to each local environment. Global work–life needs assessments conducted by leading work–life consultants Shapiro and Noble (2001) have identified three surprisingly consistent themes in what employees from around the world identify as being important barriers to reconciling their work and personal lives. The three issues identified included a lack of flexible work policies and practices, the availability and affordability of dependent care, and the negative impact of work overload and long working hours.

Although such issues are increasingly recognized as important for employers and employees in the global context, there has been very little research focused on this area. The aims of this chapter are, first, to develop a framework that can be used to guide managers' decision-making to build a global work–life strategy, and second, to illustrate how this framework can be applied, by analyzing approaches to work–life strategy in several MNEs. We compare an MNE that is at an early stage of developing a work–life strategy with other firms that are well-advanced in this area.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Harmonizing Work, Family, and Personal Life
From Policy to Practice
, pp. 166 - 206

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488498.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organisational research. Academy of Management Review, 28, 13–33.Google Scholar

Anonymous (2005). Juggling work with life. graphicartsmonthly.com, February, S14–S15.

Aycan, Z. (2005). The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1083–1119.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartlett, K. R., Lawler, J. J., Bae, J., Chen, S.-J., & Wan, D. (2002). Differences in international human resource development among indigenous firms and multinational affiliates in East and South East Asia. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13, 383–405.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brewster, C. & Suutari, V. (2005). Global HRM: Aspects of a research agenda. Personnel Review, 34(1), 5–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Deng, P. (2004). Outward investment by Chinese MNCs: Motivations and implications. Business Horizons, 47(3), 8–16.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dowling, P. J. (1988). International and domestic personnel/human resource management: Similarities and differences. In Schuler, R. S., Youngblood, R. S., & Huber, V. L. (eds), Readings in Personnel and Human Resource Management. St. Paul, MI: West.Google Scholar

Dowling, P. J. & Welch, D. E. (2004). International Human Resource Management: Managing People in a Multinational Context (4th ed.). London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar

Doz, Y. & Prahalad C. K. (1991). Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 145–164.CrossRef Google Scholar

Earley, P. C. & Gibson, C. (2002). Multinational Teams: A New Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar

Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 145–167.Google Scholar

Edwards, T. & Kuruvilla, S. (2005). International HRM: National business systems, organizational politics and the international division of labour in MNCS. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 1–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Egan, M. L. & Bendick, M. Jr. (2003). Workforce diversity initiatives of U. S. multinational corporations in Europe. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45, 701–727.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferris, G. R., Hall, A. T., Royle, M. T., & Martocchio, J. J. (2004). Theoretical developments in the field of human resource management: Issues and challenges for the future. Organizational Analysis, 12, 231–254.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar

Gelfand, M. J. & Knight, A. P. (2005). Cross-cultural perspectives on work–family conflict. In Poelmans, S. A. Y. (ed.), Work and Family: An International Research Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gerhart, B. & Fang, M. (2005). National culture and human resource management: assumptions and evidence. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 971–986.Google Scholar

Giue, J. & Petrescu, O. (2005). Case Study 2005 – Work–life, Flexibility & Mobility: Ensuring Global Support of Flexibility within IBM's On-Demand Company (Chapter 5, in this volume).Google Scholar

Haas, L. L., Hwang, P., & Russell, G. (2000). Organizational Change and Gender Equity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Harris, H. & Brewster, C. (2003). Alternatives to traditional international assignments. In Mayrhofer, W., Stahl, G. & Kuhlmann, T. (eds), Innovative Ansatze im Internationalen Personalmanagement (Innovating HRM). München/Mering: Hampp Verlag.Google Scholar

Hein, C. (2005). Reconciling Work and Family Responsibilities: Practical Ideas from Global Experience. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures' Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Human Resources Development Canada. (2002). Work–life balance in Canadian workplaces (http://labour-travail.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/worklife/welcome-en.cfm).

Husted, B. W. (2003). Globalization and cultural change in international business research. Journal of International Management, 9, 427–433.CrossRef Google Scholar

Juhel, M. H. (2001). Globalization, privatization and restructuring of ports. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 3(2), 139–174.CrossRef Google Scholar

Korabik, K., Lero, D., & Ayman, R. (2003). A micro–macro approach to cross-cultural work–family research. Paper presented at the European Academy of Management, Milan, Italy.

Lazarova, M. & Caligiuri, P. (2001). Retaining repatriates: The role of organizational support practices. Journal of World Business, 36, 389–401.Google Scholar

Leung, K., Bhagat, R. S., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. S. (2005). Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 357–378.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lobel, S. & Faught, F. (1996). Four methods for proving the value of work-life initiatives. Compensation and Benefits Review, 28(6), 50–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Losey, M., Meisinger, S. R., & Ulrich, D. (2005). Conclusion: reality, impact and professionalism. Human Resource Management, 44, 201–206.Google Scholar

McWilliams, A., Fleet, D. D., & Wright, P. M. (2001). Strategic management of human resources for global competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategies, 18(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 441–452.Google Scholar

Meyerson, D. & Martin, J. (1987). Cultural change: An integration of three different views. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 623–647.CrossRef Google Scholar

Michaels, B. (1995). A global glance at work and family. Personnel Journal, 74(4), 85–93.Google Scholar

Ministry of Manpower Singapore. (2005). Work–Life Harmony Report: Findings and Recommendations for Employers on how to use Work–Life Strategies to Optimise Business Performance. Singapore: Ministry of Manpower.

Patrickson, M. & Hartmann, L. (2001). Human resource management in Australia. Prospects for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Manpower, 22(3), 198–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Perry-Smith, J. E. & Blum, T. C. (2000). Work–family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1107–1117.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J. (2005). Changing mental models: HR's most important task. Human Resource Management, 44, 123–128.CrossRef Google Scholar

Poelmans, S. (2005). Organizational research on work and family: Recommendations for future research. In Poelmans, S. (ed.), Work and Family: An International Research Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Poelmans, S., Chinchilla, N. & Cardona, P. (2003). The adoption of family-friendly HRM policies: Competing for scarce resources in the labour market. International Journal of Manpower, 24(2), 128–147.CrossRef Google Scholar

Poster, W. R. & Prasad, S. (2005). Work–family relations in transnational perspective: A view from high-tech firms in India and the United States. Social Problems, 52, 122–146.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ramamurti, R. (2004). Developing countries and MNEs: Extending and enriching the research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 277–283.Google Scholar

Roberts, K., Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Managing the global workforce: Challenges and strategies. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 93–106.Google Scholar

Roehling, M. V., Boswell, W. R., Caligiuri, P., Feldman, D., Graham, M. E., Guthrie, J., Motohiro, M., & Tansky, J. W. (2005). The future of HR management: Research needs and directions. Human Resource Management, 44, 207–216.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schuler, R. S., Dowling, P. J., & De Cieri, H. (1993). An integrative framework of strategic international human resource management. Journal of Management, 19, 419–460.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shapiro, A. & Noble, K. (2001). A work–life lens helps bring a global workforce into focus. It's About Time, 2 (Spring), 1–2.Google Scholar

Sheridan, A. & Conway, L. (2001). Workplace flexibility: Reconciling the needs of employers and employees. Women in Management Review, 16(1), 5–11.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spinks, N. (2003). Work–life around the world (Building a global work–life strategy). Paper presented at the Designing the Future, 7th Annual Work–Life Conference, Orlando, Florida.

Spinks, N. (2005). Work–Life Around the World: Building a Global Work–Life Strategy.Toronto: Work–Life Harmony Enterprises.Google Scholar

Stroh, L. K. & Caligiuri, P. M. (1998). Increasing global competitiveness through effective people management. Journal of World Business, 33(1), 1–16.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thompson, M. A. & Richter, A. S. (1998). Using culture principles to resolve the paradox in international remuneration. In R. Platt (ed.), The Best of Global HR. Scottsdale, AZ, WorldatWork.

Turnbull, P. (2000). Contesting globalization on the waterfront. Politics & Society, 28, 273–97.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vincola, A. (1998). How to set a global work–life strategy: Work–Life Matters. (www.bcsolutionsmag.com/Archives/special_sections/global_work_life.htm).

Welbourne, T. (2005). Editor-in-chief's note. Human Resource Management, 44, 113–114.CrossRef Google Scholar

Working Mother Magazine, www.workingmother.com

Yang, N. (2005). Individualism–collectivism and work–family interfaces: A Sino–U.S. Comparison. In Poelmans, S. A. Y. (ed.), Work and Family: An International Research Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Zhu, C. J. (1997). Human resource development in China during the transition to a new economic system. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 35(3), 19–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zikmund, W. (2000). Business Research Methods. Sydney: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.