The Last Barriers in High-Level L2 Speech

doi:10.1017/9781316809686.003

2 - The Last Barriers in High-Level L2 Speech

Morphosyntax in Focus

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 June 2018

Inge Bartning and

Fanny Forsberg Lundell

Edited by

Kenneth Hyltenstam ,

Inge Bartning and

Lars Fant

Show author details

Kenneth Hyltenstam: Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Inge Bartning: Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Lars Fant: Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter addresses the mastery of morphosyntax in L2 French in relation to the speakers’ command of formulaic sequences, information structure, low-frequent vocabulary and fluency. The studies underlying this chapter were all based on the InterFra corpus of oral production by highly proficient L2 speakers (university students and ‘cultural migrants’, and by native controls). Possibilities of nativelikeness according to a ‘pass-as-a-native’ perception test are presented, as well as a proposal for establishing differentiated high-level proficiency stages. A major finding is that highly proficient non-native speakers’ mastery of morphosyntax clearly differs from that of native speakers in cognitively challenging contexts. In addition, linguistic criteria are provided that discriminate between different highly proficient levels of L2 mastery and between L2 mastery and L1 acquisition. These criteria are: non-targetlike morphosyntactic forms, formulaic sequences and low-frequent vocabulary in contrast to fluency and information structure, which become nativelike.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: High-Level Language Proficiency in Second Language and Multilingual Contexts , pp. 50 - 72

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316809686.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abrahamsson, N. 2012. Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. High-level L2 acquisition, learning and use. Thematic issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34/2: 187–214.10.1017/S0272263112000022CrossRef Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. 2009. Age of L2 acquisition and degree of nativelikeness – listener perception vs linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 58/3: 249–306.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ågren, M. 2008. A la Recherche de la Morphologie Silencieuse. Sur le Développement en Français L2 Écrit. Études Romanes de Lund 84. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Ågren, M. 2016. Apprendre l’orthographe profonde du français langue étrangère. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée XXI/2: 95–108.10.3917/rfla.212.0095CrossRef Google Scholar

Bardel, C. & Gudmundson, A. 2018 (this volume, Chapter 5). Developing lexical complexity in oral production: limitations and possibilities of the advanced L2 learner, in Hyltenstam, K., Bartning, I. & Fant, L. (eds.), High-Level Language Proficiency in Second Language and Multilingual Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bofman, T. 1989. Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 17–34.10.1017/S0272263100007816CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartning, I. 1997. L’apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Tour d’horizon et esquisse d’une caractérisation de la variété avancée. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, (AILE) 9: 9–50.10.4000/aile.1316CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartning, I. 2009. The advanced learner variety: 10 years later, in Labeau, E. & Myles, F. (eds.), The Advanced Learner Variety: The Case of French. Bern: Peter Lang. 11–41.Google Scholar

Bartning, I. 2012. High-level proficiency in second language use: morphosyntax and discourse, in Watorek, M., Benazzo, S. & Hickman, M. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Language Acquisition. A Tribute to Clive Perdue. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 170–188.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartning, I. 2016. Morphosyntax and discourse at high levels of second language acquisition, in Hyltenstam, K. (ed.), Advanced Proficiency and Exceptional Ability in Second Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 43–71.10.1515/9781614515173-005CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartning, I., Forsberg, F. & Hancock, V. 2009. Resources and obstacles in very advanced L2 French. Formulaic language, information structure and morphosyntax. EUROSLA Yearbook 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 185–211.Google Scholar

Bartning, I., Forsberg Lundell, F. & Hancock, V. 2012. On the role of linguistic contextual factors for morphosyntactic stabilisation in high-level L2 French. High-level L2 acquisition, learning and use. Thematic issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34/2: 243–267.10.1017/S0272263112000046CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartning, I. & Schlyter, S. 2004. Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies 14/3: 281–299.10.1017/S0959269504001802CrossRef Google Scholar

Beeching, K. & Detges, U. (eds.) 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery. Cross-Linguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. 1999. Introduction: whys and whys not of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition, in Birdsong, D. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mawhaw, NJ: L. Erlbaum. 1–22.10.4324/9781410601667CrossRef Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. 2003. Authenticité de prononciation en français L2 chez des apprenants tardifs anglophones: analyses segmentales et globales. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, (AILE) 18: 17–36.10.4000/aile.1150CrossRef Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. 2005. Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 43: 319–328.10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.319CrossRef Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. 2007. Nativelike pronounciation among late learners of French as a second language, in Bohn, S.-O. & Munro, M. (eds.), Second Language Speech Learning: The Role of Language Experience in Speech Perception and Production. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 99–116.10.1075/lllt.17.12birCrossRef Google Scholar

Bongaerts, T. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation. The case of very advanced late L2 learners, in Birdsong, D. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mawhaw, NJ: L. Erlbaum. 133–159.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. J. (eds.) 2001. Frequency and Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45CrossRef Google Scholar

Carroll, S. 2005. Input and SLA: adults’ sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender, in De Keyser, R. (ed.), Grammatical Development in Language Learning. The Best of Language Learning Series. Oxford: Blackwell. 79–138.Google Scholar

Conway, Å. 2005. Le Paragraphe Oral en Français L1, Suédois L1 et Français L2. Études Romanes de Lund. 73. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Coppieters, R. 1987. Competence differences between native and non-native speakers. Language 63: 544–573.10.2307/415005CrossRef Google Scholar

Dechert, H. & Raupach, M. (eds.) 1980. Temporal Variables in Speech. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRef Google Scholar

De Keyser, R. (ed.) 2005. What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Grammatical Development in Language Learning. The Best of Language Learning Series. Oxford: Blackwell. 1–25.Google Scholar

Donaldson, B. 2011. Left dislocation in near-native French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 399–432.CrossRef Google Scholar

Donaldson, B. 2017. Negation in near-native French. Variation and sociolinguistic competence. Language Learning 67/1: 141–170.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2015. Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage, in Cadierno, T. and Eskildsen, S. W. (eds.), Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. 49–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Engel, H. 2010. Dislocation et référence aux entités en français L2. Développement, interaction, variation. Cahiers de la recherche. 43. PhD Diss. Stockholm University.Google Scholar

Erman, B., Forsberg Lundell, F. & Lewis, M. 2018 (this volume, Chapter 4). Formulaic language in advanced long-residency L2 speakers, in Hyltenstam, K., Bartning, I. & Fant, L. (eds.), High-Level Language Proficiency in Second Language and Multilingual Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Forsberg, F. 2008. Le Langage Préfabriqué – Formes, Fonctions et Fréquences en Français Parlé L2 et L1. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Forsberg, F. 2010. Using conventional sequences in L2 French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 48: 25–50.Google Scholar

Forsberg Lundell, F. & Bartning, I. (eds.) 2015a. Cultural Migrants and Optimal Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRef Google Scholar

Forsberg Lundell, F. & Bartning, I. 2015b. Successful profiles in high-level L2 French – ‘c’est un choix de vie’, in Forsberg Lundell, F. & Bartning, I. (eds.), Cultural Migrants and Optimal Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 59–82.10.21832/9781783094042CrossRef Google Scholar

Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engel, H., Gudmundson, A., Hancock, V. & Lindqvist, C. 2014. Beyond advanced stages in high-level spoken French L2. Journal of French Language Studies 24: 1–26.Google Scholar

Freed, B. F., Segalovitz, N.P. & Dewey, D. 2004. Context of learning and second language fluency in French: comparing regular classroom, study abroad and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26/2: 275–301.CrossRef Google Scholar

Granfeldt, J. 2003. L’acquisition des catégories fonctionnelles. Étude comparative du développement du DP français chez des enfants et des apprenants adultes. Études Romanes de Lund 67. Lund University.Google Scholar

Hancock, V. 2007. Quelques éléments modaux dissociés dans le paragraphe oral dans des interviews en français L2 et L1. Journal of French Language Studies 17: 23–47.10.1017/S0959269506002638CrossRef Google Scholar

Herschensohn, J. 2006. Review article Français langue seconde: from functional categories to functionalist variation. Second Language Research 22 /1: 95–113.10.1191/0267658306sr262raCrossRef Google Scholar

Hopp, H. 2010. Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua 120: 901–931.10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004CrossRef Google Scholar

Hopp, H. 2012a. The development of L2 morphology. Introduction. Second Language Research 29/ 1: 3–6.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hopp, H. 2012b. Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research 29/1: 33–56.10.1177/0267658312461803CrossRef Google Scholar

Housen, A., Kemps, N. & Pierrard, M. 2009. The use of verb morphology of advanced L2 learners and native speakers of French, in Labeau, E. & Myles, F. (eds.), The Advanced Learner Variety: The Case of French. Bern: Peter Lang. 40–61.Google Scholar

Howard, M. 2005. The emergence and use of the plus-que-parfait in advanced French interlanguage, in Dewaele, J.-M. (ed.), Focus on French as a Foreign Language, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 63–87.Google Scholar

Howard, M. 2009. Short versus long term effects of naturalistic exposure on the advanced instructed learner’s L2 development: a case study, in Labeau, E. & Myles, F. (eds.), The Advanced Learner Variety. The Case of French. Bern: Peter Lang. 93–124.Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. 2015a. Language Proficiency in Native and Non-Natives Speakers. Theory and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.41CrossRef Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. 2015b. Explaining phenomena of first and second language acquisition with constructs of implicit and explicit learning: the virtues and pitfalls of a two-system view, in Rebuschat, P. (ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 25–46.10.1075/sibil.48.02hulCrossRef Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. 1992. Non-native features of near-native speakers: on the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners, in Harris, R. J. (ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 351–368.10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61505-8CrossRef Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. (ed.) 2016. Advanced Proficiency and Exceptional Ability in Second Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614515173CrossRef Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. 2003. Maturational constraints in SLA, in Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 539–588.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K., Bartning, I. & Fant, L. 2005. High-Level Proficiency in Second Language Use. Grant application. Stockholm University.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K., Bartning, I. & Fant, L. (eds.) 2018 (this volume). High-Level Language Proficiency in Second Language and Multilingual Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kinsella, C. & Singleton, D. 2014. Much more than age. Applied Linguistics 2014, 1–23.Google Scholar

Klein, W. & Perdue., C. 1997. The basic variety or: couldn’t natural languages be much simpler? Second Language Research 13/4, 301–347.10.1191/026765897666879396CrossRef Google Scholar

Labeau, E. & Myles, F. (eds.) 2009. The Advanced Learner Varieties: The Case of French. Bern: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0353-0172-4CrossRef Google Scholar

Lahmann, C. 2015. Beyond Barriers: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Long-Term L2 Speakers’ Speech. PhD thesis. University of Groningen.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. 2007. Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. Mahwaw, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Laufer, B. & Nation, P. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: lexical sophistication in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16/3: 307–322.10.1093/applin/16.3.307CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C. 2010. La richesse lexicale dans la production orale de l’apprenant avancé de français. Canadian Modern Language Review 66/3: 393–420.10.3138/cmlr.66.3.393CrossRef Google Scholar

Long, M. H. 1990. Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 251–285.10.1017/S0272263100009165CrossRef Google Scholar

Long, M. H. 2003. Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development, in Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 487–535.CrossRef Google Scholar

Muñoz, C. & Singleton, D. 2011. A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching 44/1: 1–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2004. The Acquisition of Spanish. Morphosyntactic Development in Monolingual and Bilingual L1 Acquisition and in Adult L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.37CrossRef Google Scholar

Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R. 2003. Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the Preterite/Imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 351–398.10.1017/S0272263103000159CrossRef Google Scholar

Morel, M.-A. & Danon-Boileau, L. 1998. La Grammaire de l’Intonation. L’Exemple du Français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar

Moyer, A. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: the critical factors of age, motivation and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 81–108.10.1017/S0272263199001035CrossRef Google Scholar

Paradis, M. 2009. Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.40CrossRef Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. 1998. Language Processing and Second Language Development. Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.15CrossRef Google Scholar

Piller, I. 2002. Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 179–206.10.1111/1467-9481.00184CrossRef Google Scholar

Seliger, H.W. 1978. Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning, in Ritchie, W. C. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition Research: Issues and Implications. New York, NY: Academic Press. 11–19.Google Scholar

Sharwood-Smith, M. & Truscott, J. 2005. Stages or continua in SLA: a Mogul solution. Applied Linguistics 26/2: 219–240.10.1093/applin/amh049CrossRef Google Scholar

Skehan, P. 2009. Modelling second language performance: integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30/4: 510–532.10.1093/applin/amp047CrossRef Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. 2014. The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 46/4: 543–559.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. 2003. Near-nativeness, in Doughty, C. & Long, L. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 130–151.10.1002/9780470756492.ch6CrossRef Google Scholar

Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 195–210.CrossRef Google Scholar

von Stutterheim, C. 2003. Linguistic structure and information organisation. EUROSLA Yearbook 3:183–206.10.1075/eurosla.3.11stuCrossRef Google Scholar

Towell, R., Hawkins, R. & Bazergui, N. 1996. The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics 17: 84–119.10.1093/applin/17.1.84CrossRef Google Scholar

Vermeer, A. 2001. Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency input. Applied Psycholinguistics 22/ 2: 217–234.10.1017/S0142716401002041CrossRef Google Scholar

Véronis, J. 2011. Fréquence des mots en français parlé. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01388193.Google Scholar

Véronique, D., Carlo, C., Granget, C., Kim, J-O. & Prodeau, M. 2009. L’Acquisition de la Grammaire du Français, Langue Étrangère. Paris: Didier.10.14375/NP.9782278066513CrossRef Google Scholar

Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511519772CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.