We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Works Cited
Ackrill, J. L.1997. ‘Aristotle’s Distinction between Energeia and Kinēsis’. In Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 142–62.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H.1985. Poetic Craft in the Early Greek Elegists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adshead, K.1986. Politics of the Archaic Peloponnese: The Transformation from Archaic to Classical Politics. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Algra, K. 1999. ‘The Beginnings of Cosmology’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 46–65.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J.2007. ‘Sense and Sentence Complexity: Sentence Structure, Sentence Connection, and Tense-Aspect as Indicators of Narrative Mode in Thucydides’ “Histories”’. In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. Allan, R. J. and Buijs, M.. Leiden: Brill, 93–121.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J.2009. ‘Towards a Typology of the Narrative Modes’. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, ed. Bakker, S. J. and Wakker, G. C.. Leiden: Brill, 171–203.Google Scholar
Allan, R. J.2013. ‘History as Presence: Time, Tense and Narrative Modes in Thucydides’. In Thucydides between History and Literature, ed. Tsakmakis, A. and Tamiolaki, M.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 371–90.Google Scholar
Aloni, A.1989. L’aedo e i Tiranni: Ricerche sull’Inno Omerico a Apollo. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Aloni, A.1998. Cantare glorie di eroi: Comunicazione e performance poetica nella Grecia arcaica. Turin: G. B. Paravia.Google Scholar
Aloni, A.2001. ‘The Proem of Simonides’ Plataea Elegy and the Circumstances of Its Performance’. In Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 86–105.Google Scholar
Aloni, A.2009. ‘Elegy: Forms, Functions and Communication’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, ed. Budelmann, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–88.Google Scholar
Anhalt, E.1993. Solon the Singer. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.1981. The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, Vol. 1: From Parmenides to Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asper, M.1997. Onomata Allotria: zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Asper, M.2005. ‘Law and Logic: Towards an Archaeology of Greek Abstract Reason’. Annali dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘L’Orientale’26: 73–94.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E.1953. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, N.1975. Archery at the Dark of the Moon: Poetic Problems in Homer’s Odyssey.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Austin, N.1983. ‘Odysseus and the Cyclops: Who Is Who’. In Approaches to Homer, ed. Rubino, C. A. and Shelmerdine, W. W.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 3–37.Google Scholar
Austin, S.1986. Parmenides: Being, Bounds, and Logic. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, S.2002. ‘Parmenides, Double-Negation, and Dialectic’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 95–99.Google Scholar
Austin, S.2007. Parmenides and the History of Dialectic: Three Essays. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Austin, S.2011. ‘Existence and Essence in Parmenides’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 1–8.Google Scholar
Austin, S.2013. ‘Modality and Predication in Parmenides’ Fragment 8 and in Subsequent Dialectic’. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly87: 87–96.Google Scholar
Austin, S.2014. ‘Some Eleatic Features of Platonic and Neoplatonic Method’. Ancient Philosophy34: 65–74.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.1981. ‘Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel’. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, M.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J.1993a. ‘Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and “Presence” in Homeric Poetry’. Classical Antiquity12: 1–29.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J.1993b. ‘Boundaries, Topics, and the Structure of Discourse: An Investigation of the Particle Dé’. Studies in Language17: 275–311.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J.1997. Poetry in Speech: Orality and Homeric Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J.2005. Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J.2013. The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, S. J.2009. ‘On the Curious Combination of the Particles γάρ and οὖν’. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, ed. Bakker, S. J. and Wakker, G C.. Leiden: Brill, 41–61.Google Scholar
Bal, M.2009. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. 3rd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.1979. ‘Parmenides and the Eleatic One’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie61: 1–21.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.1982. The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.1983. ‘Aphorism and Argument’. In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, K. La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute, 91–109.Google Scholar
Barron, J. P.1969. ‘Ibycus: To Polycrates’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies16: 119–49.Google Scholar
Barron, J. P.1984. ‘Ibycus: “Gorgias” and Other Poems’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies31: 13–24.Google Scholar
Barthes, R.1977. ‘Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives’. In Image Music Text, trans. Stephen Heath. London: Harper Collins, 79–124.Google Scholar
Battezzato, L.2005. ‘Le Vie dell’Hades e le Vie di Parmenide. Filologia, Filosofia e Presenze Femminili nelle Lamine d’oro “orfiche”’.Seminari Romani di cultura greca8: 67–99.Google Scholar
Becker, A. S.1995. The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Becker, O.1937. Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Benardete, S.1965. ‘XPH and ΔEI in Plato and Others’. Glotta43: 285–98.Google Scholar
Benardete, S.1997. The Bow and the Lyre. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Benveniste, É. 1966. Problèmes de Linguistique Générale, Tome 1. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bergren, A.1993. ‘The (Re)Marriage of Penelope and Odysseus: Architecture, Gender, Philosophy’. Assemblage21: 6–23.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. and San Cristóbal, A. I. J.. 2008. Instructions for the Netherworld: The Orphic Gold Tablets. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bertelli, L.2000. ‘Hecataeus: From Genealogy to Historiography’. In The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus, ed. Luraghi, N. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67–94.Google Scholar
Betegh, G.2006. ‘Eschatology and Cosmology: Models and Problems’. In La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, ed. Sassi, M. M. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 27–50.Google Scholar
Beye, C. R.1964. ‘Homeric Battle Narrative and Catalogues’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology68: 345–73.Google Scholar
Bielohlawek, K.1940. ‘Gastmahls- und Symposionslehren bei griechischen Dichtern: Von Homer bis zur Theognissammlung und Kritias’. Wiener Studien58: 11–30.Google Scholar
Bodnár, I. M.1985. ‘Contrasting Images: Notes on Parmenides B 5’. Apeiron19: 57–63.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.). 2001. The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boeder, H.1962. Grund und Gegenwart als Frageziel der früh-griechischen Philosophie. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Böhme, R.1986. Die verkannte Muse: Dichtersprache und geistige Tradition des Parmenides. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A.2008. ‘Memory and Visualization in Homeric Discourse Markers’. In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A.. Leiden: Brill, 35–65.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A.2012. Homer’s Versicolored Fabric: The Evocative Power of Ancient Greek Epic Word-Making. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Bormann, K. 1971. Parmenides: Untersuchungen zu den Fragmenten. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
du Bouchet, J.2006. ‘Remarques sur λαoφόρoς et ἀμαξιτός dans l’iliade’. Revue de Philologie80: 273–79.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L.1986. ‘Early Greek Elegy, Symposium and Public Festival’. Journal of Hellenic Studies106: 13–35.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M.1926. ‘Homeric Words in Arcadian Inscriptions’. Classical Quarterly20: 168–78.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M.1937. ‘The Proem of Parmenides’. Classical Philology32: 97–112.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. and Wallerstein, I.. 2009. ‘History and the Social Sciences: The Longue Durée’. Review32: 171–203.Google Scholar
Bredlow, L. A.2011. ‘Parmenides and the Grammar of Being’. Classical Philology106: 283–98.Google Scholar
Bremond, C.1980. ‘The Logic of Narrative Possibilities’. New Literary History11: 387–411.Google Scholar
Broneer, O.1973. Isthmia, Vol. 1: Topography and Architecture. Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Brown, L.1994. ‘The Verb “To Be” in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks’. In Companions to Ancient Thought, Vol. 3, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 212–37.Google Scholar
Brulé, P.2005. ‘Dans le nom, tout n’est-il pas déjà dit? Histoire et géographie dans les récits généalogiques’. Kernos18: 241–68.Google Scholar
Bryan, J.2012. Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryan, J.2018. ‘Reconsidering the Authority of Parmenides’ Doxa’. In Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Bryan, J., Wardy, R., and Warren, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 20–40.Google Scholar
Buchan, M.2004. The Limits of Heroism: Homer and the Ethics of Reading. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F.2009. ‘Introducing Greek Lyric’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, ed. Budelmann, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. ed. 2018. Greek Lyric: A Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Haubold, J.. 2008. ‘Reception and Tradition’. In A Companion to Classical Receptions, ed. Hardwick, L. and Stray, C.. Oxford: Blackwell, 13–25.Google Scholar
Burford, A.1960. ‘Heavy Transport in Classical Antiquity’. The Economic History Review13: 1–18.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S.2012. ‘Belatedness in the Travels of Odysseus’. In Homeric Contexts: Neoanalysis and the Interpretation of Oral Poetry, ed. Montanari, F., Rengakos, A., and Tsagalis, C.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 269–90.Google Scholar
Burkert, W.1969. ‘Das Proömium des Parmenides und die Katabasis des Pythagoras’. Phronesis15: 1–30.Google Scholar
Burkert, W.1979. ‘Kynaithos, Polycrates, and the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’. In Arktouros. Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox, ed. Bowersock, G. W., Burkert, W., and Putnam, M. C. J.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 53–62.Google Scholar
Burkert, W.1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, W.1999. ‘The Logic of Cosmogony’. In From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, ed. Buxton, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87–106.Google Scholar
Burkert, W.2001. ‘The Making of Homer in the Sixth Century BC: Rhapsodes versus Stesichorus’. In Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad, ed. Cairns, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92–116.Google Scholar
Burnet, J.1930. Early Greek Philosophy. 4th ed. London: A. & C. Black.Google Scholar
Byre, C. S.1994. ‘The Rhetoric of Description in Odyssey 9.116–41: Odysseus and Goat Island’. The Classical Journal89: 357–67.Google Scholar
Calame, C.1987. ‘Spartan Genealogies: The Mythological Representation of a Spatial Organisation’. In Interpretations of Greek Mythology, ed. Bremmer, J.. London: Croon Helm, 153–86.Google Scholar
Calame, C.1990. Thésée et l’imaginaire athénien. Légende et culte en Grèce antique. Lausanne: Éditions Payot Lausanne.Google Scholar
Calame, C.2005. Masks of Authority: Fiction and Pragmatics in Ancient Greek Poetics, trans. P. Burk. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Calame, C.2006. ‘Logiques catalogales et formes généalogiques’. Kernos19: 23–29.Google Scholar
Calame, C.2009. Greek Mythology: Poetics, Pragmatics, Fiction, trans. J. Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calame, C.2011. ‘The Homeric Hymns as Poetic Offerings: Musical and Ritual Relationships with the Gods’. In The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 334–57.Google Scholar
Calame, C.2013. ‘Procédures hymniques dans les vers des sages cosmologues: pragmatique de la poésie didactique (d’Hésiode et Théognis à Empédocle et Parménide)’. In Hymnes de la Grèce antique: approches littéraires et historiques. Actes du colloque international de Lyon, 19–21 Juin 2008. Lyon. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux, 59–77.Google Scholar
Camp, J. M.2001. The Archaeology of Athens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, C.2015. ‘Stesichorus and the Epic Cycle’. In Stesichorus in Context, ed. Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–44.Google Scholar
Cassin, B.1987. ‘Le chant des Sirènes dans le Poème de Parménide (quelques remarques sur le fr. VIII, 26–33)’. In Études sur Parménide, Tome 2: Problèmes d’interprétation, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, 163–69.Google Scholar
Cassin, B.2011. ‘Parmenides Lost in Translation’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 59–80.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C.1996. ‘Da Elea a Hipponion e Leontinoi: lingua di Parmenide e testi epigrafici’. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik113: 14–20.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C.2002. ‘Early Editions of the Greek Epics and Homeric Textual Criticism in the Sixth and Fifth Centuries BC’. In Montanari, (ed.), 105–36.Google Scholar
Casson, L.1974. Travel in the Ancient World. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cerri, G.1995. ‘Cosmologia dell’Ade in Omero, Esiodo, e Parmenide’. Parola del Passato50: 437–67.Google Scholar
Cerri, G.1999. ‘La Poesia di Parmenide’. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica63: 7–27.Google Scholar
Cerri, G.2000. Parmenide di Elea, Poema sulla Natura. Introduzione, Testo, Traduzione, e Note; Testo Greco a Fronte. 2nd ed. Milan: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Cerri, G.2011. ‘The Astronomical Section in Parmenides’ Poem’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 21–58.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. et al. 2018. Dall’universo-blocco all’atomo nella scuola di Elea: Parmenide, Zenone, Leucippo, ed. Pulpito, M. and Ranzato, S.. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Chappell, M.2011. ‘The Homeric Hymn to Apollo: The Question of Unity’. In The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 59–81.Google Scholar
Chatman, S.1990. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H.1935. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H.1951. ‘The Characteristics and Effects of Presocratic Philosophy’. Journal of the History of Ideas12: 319–45.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H.1977. ‘Ancient Forms of Philosophical Discourse’. In Selected Papers, ed. Tarán, L.. Leiden: Brill, 14–35.Google Scholar
Chevallier, R.1976. Roman Roads, ed. Field, N. H.. London: B. T. Batsford.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 1983. The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S1989. The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S2001. ‘The New Simonides and Homer’s Hemitheoi’. In Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 182–84.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S2003. Hesiod’s Cosmos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S2009. ‘Works and Days: Tracing the Path to Arete’. In Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, ed. Montanari, F., Tsagalis, C., and Rengakos, A.. Leiden: Brill, 71–90.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S2011a. Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S2011b. ‘The Homeric Hymns as Genre’. In The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 232–53.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S2013. ‘Theology and Religion in the Homeric Hymns’. In Hymnes de la Grèce antique: approches littéraires et historiques. Actes du colloque international de Lyon, 19–21 Juin 2008. Lyon. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux, 315–22.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, E.2014. ‘Structure as Interpretation in the Homeric Odyssey’. In Defining Greek Narrative, ed. Cairns, D. and Scodel, R.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 75–100.Google Scholar
Cordero, N-L. 1984. Les deux chemins de Parménide: édition critique, traduction, études et bibliographie. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Cordero, N-L. 1987. ‘L’histoire du texte de Parménide’. In Études sur Parménide, Tome 2: problèmes d’interprétation, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, 3–24.Google Scholar
Cordero, N-L. 2004. By Being, It Is: The Thesis of Parmenides. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Cordero, N-L. 2011. ‘Parmenidean “Physics” Is Not Part of What Parmenides Calls Doxa’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 95–114.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M.1933. ‘Parmenides’ Two Ways’. Classical Quarterly27: 97–111.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M.1952. Principium Sapientiae: The Origins of Greek Philosophical Thought, ed. Guthrie, W. K. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, M. R.1974. ‘The Kouros Motif in Parmenides: B1.24’. Phronesis19: 81–94.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, M. R.2014. ‘What Are “True” Doxai Worth to Parmenides? Essaying a Fresh Look at His Cosmology’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy46: 1–31.Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L.1990. Mythe et philosophe chez Parménide. 2nd ed. Brussels: Éditions Ousia.Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L.1995. ‘Transfigurations du paradigme de la parenté’. In Le paradigme de la filiation, ed. Gayon, J. and Wunenburger, J.-J.. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L.2006a. ‘Fécondité des pratiques catalogiques’. Kernos19: 249–66.Google Scholar
Coulton, J. J. 1976. The Architectural Development of the Greek Stoa. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Coxon, A. H.2009. The Fragments of Parmenides, ed. McKirahan, R.. 2nd ed. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Crouwel, J. H.1992. Chariots and Other Wheeled Vehicles in Iron Age Greece. Amsterdam: Allard Pierson Museum.Google Scholar
Crystal, I.2002. ‘The Scope of Thought in Parmenides’. Classical Quarterly52: 207–19.Google Scholar
Curd, P.1998a. ‘Eleatic Arguments’. In Method in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Gentzler, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Curd, P.1998b. The Legacy of Parmenides. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curd, P.2006. ‘Parmenides and After: Unity and Plurality’. In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. Gill, M.-L. and Pellegrin, P.. London: Blackwell, 34–54.Google Scholar
Curd, P.2011. ‘New Work on the Presocratics’. Journal of the History of Philosophy49: 1–37.Google Scholar
Currie, B.2016. Homer’s Allusive Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cursaru, G.2016. ‘Le Proème de Parménide: anabase et /ou catabase?’ Cahiers des études anciennes53: 39–63.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B.1992. ‘Pindaro, Peana VIIb (fr.52 h Sn.M.)’. In Proceedings of the XIXth International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo, 2–9 September 1989, Vol. 1, ed El-Mosalamy, A. H. S.. Cairo: Ain Shams University, Center of Papyrological Studies, 353–73.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B.1994. ‘The Greek Paean – Lutz Käppel: Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung’. The Classical Review44: 62–65.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B.1995. ‘Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini (Parm. Frr. 1+6 D.-K.; Pind. Ol. VI 22–7; Pae. VIIb 10–20)’. Studi italiani di filologia classica88: 143–81.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B.2004. ‘Precisazioni su Pindaro, Peana 7b’. Prometheus30: 23–26.Google Scholar
Danek, G.2002. ‘Odysseus between Skylla and Charybdis’. In La mythologie et l’Odyssée. Hommage à Gabriel Germain. Actes du colloque international de Grenoble, 20–22 mai 1999, ed. Hurst, A. and Létoublon, F.. Geneva: Droz, 15–25.Google Scholar
Danek, G.2004. ‘Der Schiffskatalog der Ilias: Form und Funktion’. In Ad Fontes! Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch, ed. Heftner, H. and Tomaschitz, K.. Vienna: Phoibos Verlag, 59–72.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. 1959. Parmenides’ Auffahrt zur Göttin des Rechts. Untersuchungen zum Prooimion seines Lehrgedichts. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D.1939. Euripides: Electra. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.1982. ‘The Supplement of Copula: Philosophy before Linguistics’. In Margins of Philosophy, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 175–206.Google Scholar
Despotopoulos, T.1940. ‘Η οδοποιΐα εν Ελλάδι. Από των αρχαιοτάτων χρόνων μέχρι σήμερον’. Technika Chronika17: 255–61, 329–38, 530–40.Google Scholar
Detienne, M.1996. The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece, trans. J. Lloyd. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Detienne, M.1994. The Gardens of Adonis, trans. J. Lloyd. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Detienne, M.1998. Apollon le couteau à la main. Une approche expérimentale du polytheisme Grec. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Detienne, M.2007. ‘The Wide-Open Mouth of Truth’. In The Greeks and Us: A Comparative Anthropology of Ancient Greece, trans. J. Lloyd. Cambridge: Polity Press, 60–75.Google Scholar
Detienne, M.2009. Comparative Anthropology of Ancient Greece. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P.. 1978. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, ed. and transLloyd, . J.. Hassocks: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Di Benedetto, V. 2003. ‘Da Pindaro a Callimaco: peana 7b, vv. 11–14’. Prometheus29: 269–82.Google Scholar
Dillery, J.2005. ‘Chresmologues and Manteis: Independent Diviners and the Problem of Authority’. In Mantikê: Studies in Ancient Divination, ed. Johnston, S. I. and Struck, P. T.. Leiden: Brill, 167–231.Google Scholar
Dillon, M.1997. Pilgrims and Pilgrimage in Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R.1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R.1973. The Ancient Concept of Progress and Other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dolin, E. F.1962. ‘Parmenides and Hesiod’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology66: 93–98.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C.2001. The Raft of Odysseus: The Ethnographic Imagination of Homer’s Odyssey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dueso, J. S.2011. ‘Parmenides: Logic and Ontology’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing, 271–88.Google Scholar
Durante, M.1976. Sulla preistoria della tradizione poetica greca, Vol. 2: Risultanze della comparazione indoeuropa. Rome: Incunabula Graeca.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E.1999. ‘Plain Words in Sophocles’. In Sophocles Revisited: Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, ed. Griffin, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 95–107.Google Scholar
Ebert, T.1989. ‘Wo beginnt der Weg der Doxa? Eine Textumstellung in Fragment 8 des Parmenides’.Phronesis34: 121–38.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G.2004. Myths of the Underworld: Plato, Aristophanes, and the ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. (ed). 2011. The ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets and Greek Religion: Further Along the Path. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W.1975. ‘Type-Scenes and Homeric Hospitality’. Transactions of the American Philological Association105: 51–72.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W.1980. ‘The Structure of Homeric Catalogue’. Transactions of the American Philological Association110: 81–105.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W.1991. The Iliad. A Commentary, Vol. V: Books 17–20, ed. Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W.1992. ‘Homer and Oral Tradition: The Type-Scene’. Oral Tradition7: 284–330.Google Scholar
Ellendt, J.1864. Drei Homerische Abhandlungen. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Rutherford, I. (eds.). 2005. Pilgrimage in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Antiquity: Seeing the Gods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elwick, J.2012. ‘Layered History: Styles of Reasoning as Stratified Conditions of Possibility’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science43: 619–27.Google Scholar
Ercoles, M.2013. Stesicoro: Le testimonianze antiche. Bologna: Pàtron Editore.Google Scholar
Fachard, S. and Pirisino, D.. 2015. ‘Routes out of Attica’. In Autopsy in Athens: Recent Archaeological Research on Athens and Attica, ed. Miles, M. M.. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 139–53.Google Scholar
Faraone, C. A.2006. ‘Stanzaic Structure and Responsion in the Elegiac Poetry of Tyrtaeus’. Mnemosyne59: 19–52.Google Scholar
Fenik, B.1968. Typical Battle Scenes in the Iliad: Studies in the Narrative Techniques of Homeric Battle Description. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Ferella, C.2017. ‘Waking up Sleeping Metaphors: A Cognitive Approach to Parmenides’ Two Ways of Enquiry’. Journal for Ancient Studies6: 107–30.Google Scholar
Ferella, C.2018. ‘“A Path for Understanding”: Journey Metaphors in (Three) Early Greek Philosophers’. In Paths of Knowledge: Interconnection(s) between Knowledge and Journey in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Ferella, C and Breytenbach, C. Berlin: Edition Topoi, 47–74.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F.1992. ‘Per il testo dei peani di Pindaro’. Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici28: 143–52.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F.2002. ‘La carraia di Omero e la via degli dei: sul Peana VIIb di Pindaro’. Seminari Romani di cultura greca5: 197–212.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F.2005. ‘L’officina epica di Parmenide: due sondaggi’. Seminari Romani di cultura greca8: 113–29.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F.2007. La fonte del cipresso bianco. Racconto e sapienza dall’Odissea alle lamine misteriche. Turin: UTET libreria.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, B.1984. ‘Zur Wegmetaphorik beim Goldblättchen aus Hipponion und dem Proömium des Parmenides’. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie127: 1–22.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. and Davies, M.. 2014. Stesichorus: The Poems. Cambridge: Cambridge Classical Texts.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. 2015. ‘The State of Stesichorean Studies’. In Stesichorus in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A.2017. Heraclitus and Thales’ Conceptual Scheme: A Historical Study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M.1987. ‘Homer’s View of the Epic Narrative: Some Formulaic Evidence’. Classical Philology82: 135–38.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M.1998. The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M.2000. ‘The Cypria, the Iliad, and the Problem of Multiformity in Oral and Written Tradition’. Classical Philology95: 1–11.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M.2017. ‘Homer at the Panathenaia: Some Possible Scenarios’. In The Winnowing Oar: New Perspectives in Homeric Studies, ed. Tsagalis, C. and Markantonatos, A.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 29–40.Google Scholar
Finley, M.1965. The World of Odysseus. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flower, M. A.2008. The Seer in Ancient Greece. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Floyd, E. D.1992. ‘Why Parmenides Wrote in Verse’. Ancient Philosophy12: 251–65.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M.1990. Traditional Oral Epic. The Odyssey, Beowulf, and the Serbo-Croatian Return Song. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M.1991. Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M.1999. Homer’s Traditional Art. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M.2010. ‘“Reading Homer” through Oral Tradition’. In Approaches to Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, ed. Myrsiades, Kostas. Oxford: Peter Lang, 15–42.Google Scholar
Folit-Weinberg, B. [forthcoming, 2022]. The Language of Roads and Travel in Homer: hodos and keleuthos’. Classical Quarterly.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. J.1955. Studies in Ancient Technology, Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. J.1964. Notes on the History of Ancient Roads and Their Construction. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Ford, A.1992. Homer: Poetry of the Past. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A.1997. ‘The Inland Ship: Problems in the Performance and Reception of Homeric Epic’. In Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance and the Epic Texts, ed. Bakker, E. J. and Kahane, A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 83–109.Google Scholar
Ford, A.1999. ‘Odysseus after Dinner: Od. 9.2–11 and the Traditions of Sympotic Song’. In Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Epic and Its Legacy in Honor of Dimitrios Marinatos, ed. Rengakos, A. and Kazazis, J.. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 109–23.Google Scholar
Ford, A.2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A.2006. ‘The Genre of Genres: Paeans and Paian in Early Greek Poetry’. Poetica38: 277–95.Google Scholar
Forte, A. S. W. and Smith, C. C.. 2016. ‘New Riders, Old Chariots: Poetics and Comparative Philosophy’. In Universe and Inner Self in Early Indian and Early Greek Thought, ed. Seaford, R.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 186–203.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. A. Sheridan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P.1997a. ‘On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici39: 13–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P.1997b. ‘Second Thoughts On Closure’. In Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, ed. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3–22.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L.1987. The Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H.1973. Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy, trans. M. Hadas and J. Willis. Oxford: Alden Press.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H.1975. ‘Studies in Parmenides’. In Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. 2, ed. Allen, R. E. and Furley, D. J.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1–47.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, G.1986. ‘The Theory of the Opposites and an Ordered Universe: Physics and Metaphysics in Anaximander’. Phronesis31: 197–228.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von. 1943. ‘NOOΣ and Noein in the Homeric Poems’. Classical Philology38: 79–93.Google Scholar
Fritz, K.1945. ‘ΝΟΥΣ, Noein, and Their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part I. From the Beginnings to Parmenides’. Classical Philology40: 223–42.Google Scholar
Fritz, K.1946. ‘ΝΟΥΣ, Noein, and Their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part II. The Post-Parmenidean Period’. Classical Philology41: 12–34.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J.1973. ‘Notes on Parmenides’. In Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, ed. Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D., and Rorty, R. M.. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1–15.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J.1989. ‘Truth as What Survives the Elenchos: An Idea in Parmenides’. In The Criterion of Truth. Essays Written in Honour of George Kerford Together with a Text and Translation (with Annotations) of Ptolemy’s ‘On the Kriterion and Hegemonikon’, ed. Huby, P. and Neal, G.. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1–12.Google Scholar
Furth, M.1974. ‘Elements of Eleatic Ontology’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Garden City, NY: Princeton University Press, 241–70.Google Scholar
Gadbery, L. M.1992. ‘The Sanctuary of the Twelve Gods in the Athenian Agora’. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens61: 447–89.Google Scholar
Gagarin, M.2002. ‘Greek Law and the Presocratics’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 19–24.Google Scholar
Gagné, R.2009. ‘“Spilling the Sea out of Its Cup”: Solon’s Elegy to the Muses’.Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica91: 23–49.Google Scholar
Gagné, R.2013. Ancestral Fault in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gainsford, P.2003. ‘Formal Analysis of Recognition Scenes in the Odyssey’. Journal of Hellenic Studies123: 41–59.Google Scholar
Gallop, D. 1979. ‘“Is” Or “Is Not”?’ The Monist62: 61–80.Google Scholar
Gallop, D1984. Parmenides of Elea: Fragments. A Text and Translation with an Introduction. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, L. F.2013. Homeric Durability: Telling Time in the Iliad. London: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Garner, R. S.2005. ‘Epic and Other Genres in the Ancient Greek World’. In A Companion to Ancient Epic, ed. Foley, J. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 386–96.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J.1998. ‘Die Geburt der Erdkunde aus dem Geiste der Geometrie. Überlegungen zur Entstehung und zur Frühgeschichte der Wissenschaftlichen Geographie bei den Griechen’. In Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike, ed. Kullmann, W., Althoff, J., and Asper., M.Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen, 163–92.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L.2008. ‘Images and Experience: At the Roots of Parmenides’ Aletheia’. Ancient Philosophy28: 21–48.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L.2013. ‘Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienza. Con alcune considerazioni “Inattuali” su Zenone’. In Eleatica 2007. Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienze, ed. Rossetti, L. and Pulpito, M.. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 43–126.Google Scholar
Genette, G.1980. Narrative Discourse, trans. Lewin, J. E.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Genette, G.1982. ‘Frontiers of Narrative’. In Figures of Literary Discourse, trans. Sheridan, A.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 127–46.Google Scholar
Genette, G.1997. Paratexts: Threshholds of Interpretation, trans. J. E. Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentili, B.1988. Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece: From Homer to the Fifth Century, trans. Cole, A. T.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, D.1999. Greek Elegiac Poetry: From the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries BC. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Germain, G.1954. Genèse de l’Odyssée. Le fantastique et le sacré. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gernet, L.2004. Polyvalence des images. Testi e frammenti sulla leggenda greca, ed. Soldani, A.. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Giannisi, P.1997. ‘Chant et cheminement en Grèce archaïque’. Quaderni di storia23: 133–41.Google Scholar
Giannisi, P.2006. Récits des voies. Chant et cheminement en Grèce archaïque. Grenoble: Éditions Jérôme Millon.Google Scholar
Gigon, O.1945. Der Ursprung der griechischen Philosophie: Von Hesiod bis Parmenides. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Gill, C.1998. Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy, and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gill, K.1993. ‘On the Metaphysical Distinction between Processes and Events’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy23: 365–84.Google Scholar
Goette, H. R.2002. ‘Quarry Roads on Mt. Pentelikon and Mt. Hymettus’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R.. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 93–102.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S.1991. The Poet’s Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S.2002. The Invention of Prose. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S.2012. Sophocles and the Language of Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S.2017. ‘The Limits of the Case Study: Exemplarity and the Reception of Classical Literature’. New Literary History48: 415–35.Google Scholar
Goldin, O.1993. ‘Parmenides on Possibility and Thought’. Apeiron26: 19–36.Google Scholar
Goody, J.1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B.1965. ‘Anaximander’s Apeiron’.Phronesis10: 37–53.Google Scholar
Graf, F.1996. ‘Pompai in Greece. Some Considerations about Space and Ritual in the Greek Polis’. In The Role of Religion in the Early Greek Polis, ed. Hägg, R.. Stockholm: Paul Åströms Förlag, 55–65.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W.1980. States and Performances: Aristotle’s Test. Philosophical Quarterly30: 117–30.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W.2002a. ‘Heraclitus and Parmenides’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 27–45.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W.2002b. ‘La lumière de la lune dans la pensée grecque archaïque’. In Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique?, ed. Laks, A. and Louguet, C.. Lille: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 351–80.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W.2006. Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W.2008. ‘Heraclitus: Flux, Order, and Knowledge’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P. and Graham, D. W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169–88.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W.2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W.2013. Science Before Socrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, H.2002. ‘The Cosmology of Mortals’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 101–16.Google Scholar
Granger, H.2004. ‘Argumentation and Heraclitus’ Book’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy26: 1–17.Google Scholar
Granger, H.2007. ‘Poetry and Prose: Xenophanes of Colophon’. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association137: 403–33.Google Scholar
Granger, H.2008. ‘The Proem of Parmenides’ Poem’. Ancient Philosophy28: 1–20.Google Scholar
Gras, M. and Tréziny, H.. 2001. ‘Mégara Hyblaea. Retours sur l’agora’. In Architettura urbanistica società nel mondo antico. Giornata di studio in ricordo di Roland Martin, ed. Greco, E.. Paestum: Pandemos, 51–63.Google Scholar
Gras, M. and Tréziny, H.2012. ‘Mégara Hyblaea: le domande e le risposte’. In Alle origini della Magna Grecia: mobilità migrazioni fondazioni. Atti del cinquantesimo convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia: Taranto 1–4 Ottobre 2010. Taranto: Istituto per la storia e l’archeologia della Magna Grecia, 1133–46.Google Scholar
Gras, M., Tréziny, H., and Broise, H.. 2004. Mégara Hyblaea, Vol. 5: La ville archaïque. Rome: École Française de Rome.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B.2002. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B.2008. ‘The Ancient Reception of Homer’. In A Companion to Classical Receptions, ed. Hardwick, L. and Stray, C.. Oxford: Blackwell, 26–37.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B.2013. ‘The Poet in the Iliad’. In The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, ed. Marmadoro, A. and Hill, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J.. 2009. ‘Greek Lyric and Early Greek Literary History’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, ed. Budelmann, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 95–113.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J.2015. ‘The Homeric Text’. Ramus44: 5–28.Google Scholar
Greco, E.1998. ‘Agora eumeghetes: l’espace public dans les poleis d’Occident’. Ktèma23: 153–58.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J.2008. ‘Memory and Material Objects in the Iliad and the Odyssey’. Journal of Hellenic Studies128: 27–51.Google Scholar
Griffin, J.1980. Homer on Life and Death. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, J.1986. ‘Homeric Words and Speakers’. Journal of Hellenic Studies106: 36–57.Google Scholar
Griffith, M.1983. ‘Personality in Hesiod’. Classical Antiquity2: 37–65.Google Scholar
van Groningen, B. A.1960. La composition littéraire archaïque grecque. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C.1962. A History of Greek Philosophy: Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C.1965. A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2: The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gutting, G. 1989. Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason: Science and the History of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I.2002a. ‘Michel Foucault’s Immature Science’. In Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 87–98.Google Scholar
Hacking, I.2002b. ‘Making Up People’. In Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 99–114.Google Scholar
Hacking, I.2012. ‘“Language, Truth and Reason” 30 Years Later’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science43: 599–609.Google Scholar
Hahn, R.2001. Anaximander and the Architects: The Contributions of Egyptian and Greek Architectural Technologies to the Origins of Greek Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, B.1993. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 4: Books 9–12, ed. Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J. M.1995. ‘How Argive Was the “Argive” Heraion? The Political and Cultic Geography of the Argive Plain, 900–400 B.C.’. American Journal of Archaeology99: 577–613.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S.2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamon, P. and Baudoin, P.. 1981. ‘Rhetorical Status of the Descriptive’. Yale French Studies61: 1–26.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J.2002. ‘Parmenides and the Metaphysics of Changelessness’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 65–80.Google Scholar
Hardie, A.2013. ‘Ibycus and the Muses of Helicon’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici70: 9–36.Google Scholar
Hardie, P.1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G.1986. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, F.1988. The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History, trans. J. Lloyd. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, F.1996. Memories of Odysseus: Frontier Tales from Ancient Greece. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E.1958. ‘Parmenides and Odysseus’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology63: 133–43.Google Scholar
Havelock, E.1978. The Greek Concept of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E.1983. ‘The Linguistic Task of the Presocratics’. In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, K.. La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute, 7–82.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.1833. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, Tome 1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M.2000. Introduction to Metaphysics, ed. Fried, G. and Polt, R.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heidel, W. A.1974. ‘Qualitative Change in Presocratic Philosophy’. In The Presocratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 86–95.Google Scholar
Heiden, B.2007. ‘The Muses’ Uncanny Lies: Hesiod, Theogony 27 and Its Translators’. American Journal of Philology128: 153–75.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E.1966. ‘Das Wissen des Xenophanes’. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie109: 193–235.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E.1974. Parmenides. Die Anfänge der Ontologie, Logik und Naturwissenschaft. Munich: Ernst Heimeran Verlag.Google Scholar
Henderson, J.1997. ‘The Name of the Tree: Recounting Odyssey XXIV 340–2’. Journal of Hellenic Studies67: 87–116.Google Scholar
Herda, A. 2011. ‘How to Run a State Cult: The Organization of the Cult of Apollo Delphinios in Miletos’. In Current Approaches to Religion in Ancient Greece: Papers Presented at a Symposium at the Swedish Institute of Athens, 17–19 April 2008, ed. Haysom, M and Wallenstein, J. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet i Athen, 57–94.Google Scholar
Hermann, A.2009. ‘Parmenides versus Heraclitus?’ In Nuevos ensayos sobre Heráclito. Actas del Segundo Symposium Heracliteum, ed. Hülsz Piccone, E.. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A. and Hoekstra, A.. 1989. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. 2: Books IX–XVI. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., Russo, J., and Fernández-Galiano, M.. 1989. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. 3: Books XVII–XXIV. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J. B.. 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, Vol. 1: Introduction and Books I–VIII. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hinds, S.1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J.1980. ‘Parmenides’ Cogito Argument’. Ancient Philosophy1: 5–16.Google Scholar
Hobden, F.2013. The Symposium in Ancient Greek Society and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J.2002. ‘Ptolis and Agore. Homer and the Archaeology of the City-State’. In Montanari, (ed.), 297–342.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T.1991. ‘The City of Athens: Space, Symbol, Structure’. In City-States in Classical Antiquity and Medieval Italy, ed. Molho, A., Raaflaub, K. A., and Emlen, J.. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 355–80.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T.1998. ‘Öffentliche Räume in frühen griechischen Städten’. Ktèma23: 159–70.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T.1999. Öffentliche Räume in frühen griechischen Städten. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T.2007. ‘Urban Spaces and Central Places: The Greek World’. In Classical Archaeology, ed. Alcock, S. E. and Osborne, R.. Oxford: Blackwell, 164–81.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U.1969. Vom Wesen des Seienden. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U.1970. ‘Anaximander and the Beginnings of Greek Philosophy’. In Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. 1, ed. Furley, D. J. and Allen, R. E.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 281–322.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S.2009. ‘Greek Lyric and the Politics and Sociologies of Archaic and Classical Greek Communities’. In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, ed. Budelmann, F. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–57.Google Scholar
Houby-Nielsen, S.1995. ‘“Burial Language” in the Archaic and Classical Kerameikos’. Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens1: 129–91.Google Scholar
Houby-Nielsen, S.1996. ‘The Archaeology of Ideology in the New Kerameikos: New Interpretations of the “Opferrinnen”’. In The Role of Religion in the Early Greek Polis, ed. Hägg, R. Stockholm: Paul Äströms Förlag, 41–54.Google Scholar
Houby-Nielsen, S.2009. ‘Attica: A View from the Sea’. In A Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Raaflaub, K. A. and van Wees, H.. London: Blackwell, 189–211.Google Scholar
Hülsz Piccone, E.2013. ‘Some Comments on L. Gemelli Marciano’s “Lezioni Eleatiche”’. In Eleatica 2007. Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienze, ed. Rossetti, L. and Pulpito, M.. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 149–58.Google Scholar
Hunter, R.2014. Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R.2018. The Measure of Homer: The Ancient Reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hussey, E.1972. The Presocratics. Bristol: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hussey, E.1999. ‘Heraclitus’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Sedley, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 88–112.Google Scholar
Hussey, E.2006. ‘The Beginnings of Science and Philosophy in Archaic Greece’. In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. Gill, M. L and Pellegrin, P. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 3–19.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O.2001. Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, E.2005. Solon and Early Greek Poetry: The Politics of Exhortation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W.1948. The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers, trans. E. Robinson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W.1966. Five Essays, trans. A. Fiske. Montreal: Mario Casalini.Google Scholar
Jameson, G.1958. ‘“Well-Rounded Truth” and Circular Thought in Parmenides’. Phronesis3: 15–30.Google Scholar
Janko, R.1982. Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janko, R.1992. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 4: Books 13–16, ed. Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janni, P.1984. La mappa e il periplo: cartografia antica e spazio odologico. Rome: Giorgio Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Jantzen, J.1976. Parmenides zum Verhältnis von Sprache und Wirklichkeit. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Johnstone, M. A.2014. ‘On “Logos” in Heraclitus’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy47: 1–29.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F.1987. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F.1992. ‘The Subjective Style in Odysseus’ Wanderings’. Classical Quarterly42: 1–11.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F.2001. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F.2011a. ‘Homer’. In Space in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. de Jong, I. J. F.. Leiden: Brill, 21–38.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F.2011b. ‘Introduction: Narratological Theory on Space’. In Space in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. de Jong, I. J. F.. Leiden: Brill, 1–20.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F.2011c. ‘The Shield of Achilles: From Metalepsis to Mise En Abyme’. Ramus40: 1–14.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F.2012. Homer: Iliad XXII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, M.1994. ‘The Distribution of Sanctuaries in Civic Space in Arkadia’. In Placing the Gods: Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E. and Osborne, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217–30.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. 1997. ‘Hexameter Progression and the Homeric Hero’s Solitary State’. In Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, ed. Bakker, E. J and Kahane, A. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 110–37.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.1970. Review of J. Mansfeld, Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die menschliche Welt (1964). Gnomon42: 113–19.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.1973. The Verb ‘Be’ and Its Synonyms, ed. Verhaar, J. W. M.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.1994. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.2002. ‘Parmenides and Plato’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V. and Graham, D. W.. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 81–93.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.2003. ‘Writing Philosophy: Prose and Poetry from Thales to Plato’. In Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, ed. Yunis, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–61.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.2009a. ‘A Return to the Theory of the Verb “Be” and the Concept of Being’. In Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–42.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.2009b. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H.2009c. ‘The Thesis of Parmenides’. In Essays on Being, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–66.Google Scholar
Käppel, L. 1992. Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kase, E. W.1973. ‘Mycenaean Roads in Phocis’. American Journal of Archaeology77: 74–77.Google Scholar
Katz, M. A.1991. Penelope’s Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kavoulaki, A.1999. ‘Processional Performance and the Democratic Polis’. In Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy, ed. Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 293–320.Google Scholar
Kavoulaki, A.2011. ‘Observations on the Meaning and Practice of GreekPompe (Procession)’. In Current Approaches to Religion in Ancient Greece: Papers Presented at a Symposium at the Swedish Institute of Athens, 17–19 April 2008, ed. Haysom, M. and Wallenstein, J.. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet i Athen, 135–50.Google Scholar
Kelly, A.2015. ‘Stesichorus’ Homer’. In Stesichorus in Context, ed. Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.1997. ‘Virgilian Epic’. In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, ed. Martindale, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145–154.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1963. Action, Emotion, and Will. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P.1999. In the Dark Places of Wisdom. Inverness, CA: Golden Sufi Center.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P.2003. Reality. Inverness, CA: Golden Sufi Center.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S.1962. The Songs of Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S.1983. ‘Orality and Sequence’. In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, K.. La Salle, IL: The Hegeler Institute, 83–90.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S.1985. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 1: Books 1–4, ed. Kirk, G. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. and Raven, J. E.. 1957. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M.. 2007. The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, G. M.1974. Early Greek Monody: The History of a Poetic Type. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Knudsen, R. A.2014. Homeric Speech and the Origins of Rhetoric. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Koning, H. H.2010. Hesiod: The Other Poet. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Koopman, N. 2018. Ancient Greek Ekphrasis: Between Description and Narration. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Korres, C. J. and Tomlinson, R. A.. 2002. ‘Sphettia Hodos: Part of the Road to Kephale and Sounion’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R.. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 43–59.Google Scholar
Korres, M. (ed.) 2012. Αττικής οδοί: Αρχαίοι δρόμοι της Αττικής. Athens: Melissa.Google Scholar
Kowerski, L. M.2005. Simonides on the Persian Wars: A Study of the Elegiac Verses of the ‘New Simonides’. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kraus, M.2013. ‘Parmenides’. In Die Philosophie der Antike, Band 1: Frühgriechische Philosophie, ed. Flashar, H., Bremer, D., and Rechenauer, G.. Basel: Schwabe, 441–530.Google Scholar
Krischer, T.1965. ‘Die Entschuldigung des Sängers (Ilias B 484–493)’. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie108: 1–11.Google Scholar
Krischer, T.1971. Formale Konventionen der homerischen Epik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Kroon, C. H. M.2007. ‘Discourse Modes and the Use of Tenses in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’. In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. Allan, R. J. and Buijs, M.. Leiden: Brill, 64–92.Google Scholar
Kurfess, C.2016. ‘The Truth about Parmenides’ Doxa’. Ancient Philosophy36: 13–45.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. V.2005. ‘Choral Lyric as “Ritualization”: Poetic Sacrifice and Poetic Ego in Pindar’s Sixth Paian’. Classical Antiquity24: 81–130.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. V.2007. ‘Archaic Greek Poetry’. In The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–69.Google Scholar
Kusch, M.1991. Foucault’s Strata and Fields: An Investigation into Archaeological and Genealogical Science Studies. London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Laks, A.2013. ‘Phenomenon and Reference: Revisiting Parmenides, Empedocles, and the Problem of Rationalization’. In Modernity’s Classics, ed. Humphreys, S C. and Wagner, R. G.. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 165–86.Google Scholar
Langdon, M K.2002. ‘Hymettiana IV: Ancient Roads through Hymettos’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R.. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 61–71.Google Scholar
Latona, M. J.2008. ‘Reining in the Passions: The Allegorical Interpretation of Parmenides B Fragment 1’. American Journal of Philology129: 199–230.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, G. 2003. Poetics before Plato: Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.1981. ‘Perceiving and Knowing in the Iliad and Odyssey’. Phronesis26: 2–24.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.1984. ‘Parmenides’ Critique of Thinking: The Poludêris Elenchos of Fragment 7’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy2: 1–30.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.1992. Xenophanes of Colophon: Fragments. A Text and Translation with a Commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.1994a. ‘The Emergence of Philosophical Interest in Cognition’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy12: 1–34.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.1994b. ‘The Significance of κατὰ πάντ ἄ<σ>τη in Parmenides Fr. 1.3’. Ancient Philosophy14.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.1999. ‘Early Interest in Knowledge’. In Cambridge Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 225–49.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.2002. ‘Parmenidean Elenchos’. In Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond, ed. Scott, G. A.. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 19–35.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.2008. ‘The Humanizing of Knowledge in Presocratic Thought’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P. and Graham, D. W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 458–84.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H.2013. ‘A Systematic Xenophanes?’ In Early Greek Philosophy, ed. McCoy, J. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 77–90.Google Scholar
Lesky, A. 1961. Göttliche und menschliche Motivation im homerischen Epos. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. 1996. ‘The *Da- Root: Partition and Democracy’. In Cleisthenes the Athenian: An Essay on the Representation of Space and Time in Greek Political Thought from the End of the Sixth Century to the Death of Plato, ed. Curtis, D. A. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 128–35.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. 1996. Cleisthenes the Athenian: An Essay on the Representation of Space and Time in Greek Political Thought from the End of the Sixth Century to the Death of Plato, trans. D. A. Curtis. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, F. A.2009. ‘Parmenides’ Modal Fallacy’. Phronesis54: 1–8.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.1979. Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.1987. The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.1991a. ‘Greek Cosmologies’. In Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–63.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.1991b. ‘Popper versus Kirk: A Controversy in the Interpretation of Greek Science’. In Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–20.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.1992. ‘Methods and Problems in the History of Ancient Science: The Greek Case’. Isis83: 564–77.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2000. ‘Demonstration and the Idea of Science’. In Greek Thought: A Guide to Classical Knowledge, ed. Brunschwig, J., Lloyd, G. E. R., and Pellegrin, P.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 243–68.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2004. Ancient Worlds, Modern Reflections: Philosophical Perspectives on Greek and Chinese Science and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2007. Cognitive Variations: Reflections on the Unity and Diversity of the Human Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2009. Disciplines in the Making: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Elites, Learning, and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2012. Being, Humanity, and Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2013. ‘Mathematics and Narrative: An Aristotelian Perspective’. In Circles Disturbed, ed. Mazur, B. and Doxiadis, A.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 389–406.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2015. Analogical Investigations: Historical and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2017a. ‘Fortunes of Analogy: Replies to Commentators’. Australasian Philosophical Review1: 336–45.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R.2017b. The Ambivalences of Rationality: Ancient and Modern Cross-Cultural Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Sivin, N.. 2002. The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. and Zhao, J. J. (eds.) 2018. Ancient Greece and China Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H.2002. ‘Ancient Roads in Attica and the Megaris’. In Ancient Roads in Greece, ed. Goette, H. R.. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 73–92.Google Scholar
Lolos, Y. A.2003. ‘Greek Roads: A Commentary on the Ancient Terms’. Glotta79: 137–74.Google Scholar
Lolos, Y. A.2011. Land of Sikyon: Archaeology of a Greek City-State. Princeton, NJ: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Long, A. A.1963. ‘The Principles of Parmenides’ Cosmogony’. Phronesis8: 90–107.Google Scholar
Long, A. A.1985. ‘Early Greek Philosophy’. In The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. 1: Greek Literature, ed. Easterling, P. E. and Knox, B. M. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 245–57.Google Scholar
Long, A. A.1996. ‘Parmenides on Thinking Being’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy12: 125–62.Google Scholar
Long, A. A.2011. ‘Poets as Philosophers and Philosophers as Poets: Parmenides, Plato, Lucretius and Wordsworth’. In Para/Textuelle Verhandlungen zwischen Dichtung und Philosophie in der frühen Neuzeit, ed. Huss, B., Marzillo, P., and Ricklin, T.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 293–308.Google Scholar
Long, C. R.1987. The Twelve Gods of Greece and Rome. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lord, A. B.2000. The Singer of Tales. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lorimer, H. L.1903. ‘The Country Cart of Ancient Greece’. The Journal of Hellenic Studies23: 132–51.Google Scholar
Lowe, N. 2000. The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Löw, E. 1935. ‘Das Verhältnis von Logik und Leben bei Parmenides’. Wiener Studien53: 1–36.Google Scholar
Lulli, L.2011. Narrare in distici. L’elegia greca arcaica e classica di argomento storico-mitico. Rome: Edizioni Quasar.Google Scholar
Lulli, L.2016. ‘Elegy and Epic’. In Iambus and Elegy, ed. Swift, L. and Carey, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 193–209.Google Scholar
Luther, W.1954. Weltansicht und Geistesleben. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Lynn-George, M.1988. Epos, Word, Narrative and the Iliad. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacDonald, W. A. and Rapp, G. R. 1972. The Minnesota Messenia Expedition: Reconstructing a Bronze Age Regional Environment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K. T. M.2015. Presocratic Poetics: Parmenides, Empedocles and Literary Form. Unpublished dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K. T. M.2016. ‘Language and Learning with the Presocratics: Xenophanes and Parmenides as Educators and Linguists’. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft26: 25–48.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K. T. M.2017. ‘Parmenides and Early Greek Allegory’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici79: 31–59.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, M. M.1982. ‘Parmenides’ Dilemma’. Phronesis27: 1–12.Google Scholar
Maehler, H.1963. Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Malkin, I.2002. ‘Exploring the Validity of the Concept of “Foundation”: A Visit to Megara Hyblaia’. In Oikistes: Studies in Constitutions, Colonies, and Military Power in the Ancient World Offered in Honor of A. J. Graham, ed. Gorman, V. B. and Robinson, E. W.. Leiden: Brill, 195–225.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J.1964. Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die menschliche Welt. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J.1990. ‘Myth Science Philosophy: A Question of Origins’. In Studies in the Historiography of Greek Philosophy. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1–21.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J.1995. ‘Insight by Hindsight: Intentional Unclarity in Presocratic Proems’.Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies40: 225–32.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J.1999. ‘Sources’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 22–44.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J.2015. ‘Parmenides from Right to Left’. Études platoniciennes12.Google Scholar
Marchand, J. C.2009a. ‘All Roads Lead to Nemea: Physical Evidence for Ancient Roads in the Territory of Kleonai in the Northeastern Peloponnesos’.Archäologischer Anzeiger2: 1–49.Google Scholar
Marchand, J. C.2009b. ‘Kleonai, the Corinth–Argos Road, and the “Axis of History”’.Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens78: 107–63.Google Scholar
Marincola, J.2007. ‘Odysseus and the Historians’.Syllecta Classica18: 1–79.Google Scholar
Martin, R.1973. ‘Rapports entre les structures urbaines et les modes de division et d’exploitation du territoire’. In Problèmes de la terre en Grèce ancienne, ed. Finley, M. I. Paris: Mouton & Co., 97–112.Google Scholar
Martin, R.1983. ‘L’espace civique, religieux et profane dans les cités grecques de l’archaïsme à l’époque hellénistique’. In Architecture et société: De l’archaïsme grec à la fin de la république romaine. Paris: École Française de Rome, 9–41.Google Scholar
Maslov, B.2012. ‘The Real Life of the Genre of Prooimion’. Classical Philology107: 191–205.Google Scholar
Maslov, B.2015. Pindar and the Emergence of Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maslov, B.2016. ‘The Genealogy of the Muses: An Internal Reconstruction of Archaic Greek Metapoetics’.American Journal of Philology137: 411–46.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D.1994. Euripides: Phoenissae. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R.2008. ‘Signs and Arguments in Parmenides B8’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P. W and Graham, D. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189–229.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R.2010. Philosophy before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Meijer, P. A.1969. ‘Das methodologische im 5 Fragment des Parmenides’. Classica at medievalia30: 102–08.Google Scholar
Meijer, P. A.1997. Parmenides Beyond the Gates: The Divine Revelation on Being, Thinking, and the Doxa. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Mertens, D.2006. Städte und Bauten der Westgriechen: von der Kolonisationszeit bis zur Krise um 400 vor Christus. Munich: Hirmer.Google Scholar
Michell, H.1964. Sparta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, M.1977. ‘La logique implicite de la cosmogonie d’Hésiode: étude des vers 116 à 133 de la Théogonie’. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale82: 289–306.Google Scholar
Miller, M.1979. ‘Parmenides and the Disclosure of Being’.Apeiron13: 12–35.Google Scholar
Miller, M.2001. ‘“First of All”: On the Semantics and Ethics of Hesiod’s Cosmogony’.Ancient Philosophy21: 251–75.Google Scholar
Miller, M.2006. ‘Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the Proem to Parmenides’ Poem’.Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy30: 1–47.Google Scholar
Minchin, E.1999. ‘Describing and Narrating in Homer’sIliad’. In Signs of Orality: The Oral Tradition and Its Influence in the Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A.. Leiden: Brill, 49–64.Google Scholar
Minchin, E.2001. Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minchin, E.2008. ‘Spatial Memory and the Composition of theIliad’. In Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World, ed. Mackay, E. A. Leiden: Brill, 9–34.Google Scholar
Mogyoródi, E.2006. ‘Xenophanes’ Epistemology and Parmenides’ Quest for Knowledge’. In La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, ed. Sassi, M. M.. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 123–60.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. (ed.) 2002. Omero tremila anni dopo. Atti del Congresso di Genova 6–8 luglio 2000. Con la collaborazione di P. Ascheri. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S.2005. Wandering in Greek Culture. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moorhouse, A. C.1959. Studies in the Greek Negatives. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C.1994. ‘The Evolution of a Sacral “Landscape”: Isthmia, Perachora, and the Early Corinthian State’. In Placing the Gods: Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E and Osborne, R. Oxford: Clarendon, 105–41.Google Scholar
Morgan, C.2003. Early Greek States Beyond the Polis. Chicago: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morgan, K.2000. Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D.2007. The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. S.1955. ‘Parmenides and Er’.Journal of Hellenic Studies75: 59–68.Google Scholar
Most, G. W.1985. The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Most, G. W.1989. ‘The Structure and Function of Odysseus’ Apologoi’. Transactions of the American Philological Association119: 15–30.Google Scholar
Most, G. W.1999a. ‘The Poetics of Early Greek Philosophy’. In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 332–62.Google Scholar
Most, G. W.1999b. ‘From Logos to Mythos’. In From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, ed. Buxton, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–21.Google Scholar
Most, G. W.2007. ‘ἄλλος δ’ έξ ἄλλου δέχεται: Presocratic Philosophy and Traditional Greek Epic’. In Literatur und Religion, Vol. 1: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei en Griechen, ed. Bierl, A., Wesselmann, K., and Lämmle, R.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 271–302.Google Scholar
Moulton, C.1974. ‘The End of the Odyssey’. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies15: 153–69.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1965. ‘φράζω and Its Derivatives in Parmenides’.Classical Philology60: 261–62.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1973. ‘Heraclitus, Parmenides, and the Naive Metaphysics of Thing’. In Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, ed. Lee, E. N, Mourelatos, A. P. D, and Rorty, R. M. Assen: Van Gorcum, 16–48.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1976. ‘Determinacy and Indeterminacy, Being and Non-Being in the Fragments of Parmenides’.Canadian Journal of Philosophy6 (Supplement 1): 45–60.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1978. ‘Events, Processes, and States’.Linguistics and Philosophy2: 415–34.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1979a. ‘“Nothing” as “Not-Being”: Some Literary Contexts that Bear on Plato’. In Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox, ed. Bowersock, G. W, Burkert, W, and Putnam, M. C. J. New York: De Gruyter, 319–29.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1979b. ‘Some Alternatives in Interpreting Parmenides’.The Monist62: 3–14.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1981. ‘Pre-Socratic Origins of the Principle that there Are no Origins from Nothing’.The Journal of Philosophy78: 649–65.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1993. ‘Aristotle’s kinêsis/energeia Distinction: A Marginal Note on Kathleen Gill’s Paper’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy23: 385–88.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.1999. ‘Parmenides and the Pluralists’. Apeiron32(2): 117–30.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.2002. ‘La terre et les étoiles dans la cosmologie de Xénophane’. In Qu’est-ce que la philosophique présocratique, ed. Laks, A. and Louguet, C.. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 331–50.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.2008a. ‘The Cloud-Astrophysics of Xenophanes and Ionian Material Monism’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P and Graham, D. W. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 134–68.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.2008b. The Route Of Parmenides. 2nd ed. Las Vegas, NV: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.2013a. ‘Sounds, Images, Mysticism, and Logic in Parmenides’. In Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienze, ed. Rossetti, L. and Pulpito., M.Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 159–77.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.2013b. ‘Parmenides, Early Greek Astronomy, and Modern Scientific Realism’. In Early Greek Philosophy, ed. McCoy, J. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 91–112.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.2016a. ‘“Limitless” and “Limit” in Xenophanes’ Cosmology and in His Doctrine of Epistemic “Construction” (dokos)’. In Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy: Ancient Epistemology, ed. Ierodiakonou, K and Hasper, P. S. Münster: Mentis, 16–37.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D.2016b. ‘Two Neo-Analytic Approaches to Parmenides’ Metaphysical-Cosmological Poem’.Rhizomata4: 257–68.Google Scholar
Muchnová, D.2011. Entre conjonction, connecteur et particule: le cas de ἐπεί en grec ancien. Étude syntaxique, sémantique et pragmatique. Prague: Éditions Karolinum.Google Scholar
Mülke, C.2002. Solons politische Elegien und Iamben (Fr. 1–13; 32–37 West). Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Leipzig: K. G. Saur Verlag.Google Scholar
Mure, W.1842. Journal of a Tour in Greece. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S.1987. Disguise and Recognition in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, O.1983. ‘The Symposion in History’. In Tria corda: scritti in onore di Arnaldo Momigliano, ed. Gabba, E. Biblioteca di Athenaeum, 1. Como: Edizioni New Press, 257–72.Google Scholar
Murray, O.1991. ‘War and the Symposium’. In Dining in a Classical Context, ed. Slater, W. J. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 83–104.Google Scholar
Murray, O.2008. ‘The Odyssey as Performance Poetry’. In Performance, Iconography, Reception, ed. Revermann, M and Wilson, P. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–76.Google Scholar
Murray, O.2016. ‘The Symposium between East and West’. In The Cup of Song: Studies on Poetry and the Symposion, ed. Cazzato, V, Obbink, D, and Prodi, E. E. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–27.Google Scholar
Murray, P.1981. ‘Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece’.The Journal of Hellenic Studies101: 87–100.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. N.1980. ‘Entretiens avec Tirésias’.The Classical World74: 89–106.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. N.1996. ‘Dread Goddess Revisited’. In Reading the Odyssey: Selected Interpretive Essays, ed. Schein, S. L. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 141–61.Google Scholar
Nagy, G.1979. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G.1990a. Greek Mythology and Poetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G.1990b. Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G.1996a. Homeric Questions. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G.1996b. Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G.2014. Review of M. S. Jensen, Writing Homer (2011). Gnomon86: 97–101.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A.1999. ‘On Parmenides’ Three Ways of Inquiry’. In Virtues of Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 125–38.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A.2002. ‘Parmenidean Being/Heraclitean Fire’. In Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. Caston, V and Graham, D. W. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 45–64.Google Scholar
Netz, R.1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, R. M.1987. ‘Odysseus and Hephaestus in the Odyssey’. The Classical Journal83: 12–20.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W.2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W.2007. ‘The Philosophers in Archaic Greece’.In The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169–98.Google Scholar
Niles, J. D.1978. ‘Patterning in the Wanderings of Odysseus’. Ramus7: 46–60.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1913. Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöse Rede. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Noussia-Fantuzzi, M.2010. Solon the Athenian, the Poetic Fragments. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R.1998. Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Obbink, D.2001. ‘The Genre of Plataea: Generic Unity in the New Simonides’. In Boedeker, and Sider, (eds.), 65–85.Google Scholar
Ober, J.1985. Fortress Attica: Defense of the Athenian Land Frontier 404–322 B.C. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ober, J.1991. ‘Hoplites and Obstacles’. In Hoplites: The Classical Greek Battle Experience, ed. Hanson, V. D. London: Routledge, 173–96.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D.1987. Études sur Parménide, Tome 1: Le poème de Parménide. Texte, traduction, essai critique, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D.2000. ‘Parmenides and Plato on What Is Not’. In The Winged Chariot: Collected Essays on Plato and Platonism in Honour of L. M. de Rijk, ed. Kardaun, M and Spruyt, J. Leiden: Brill, 19–104.Google Scholar
Oldfather, W. A.1916. ‘Studies in the History and Topography of Locris’.American Journal of Archaeology20: 32–61.Google Scholar
Osborne, C.1987. Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Osborne, C.1997. ‘Was Verse the Default Form for Presocratic Philosophy?’ In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, ed. Atherton, C. Bari: Levante Editori, 23–35.Google Scholar
Osborne, C.2004. Presocratic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, C.2006. ‘Was There an Eleatic Revolution in Philosophy?’ In Rethinking Revolutions Through Ancient Greece, ed. Goldhill, S. and Osborne., R.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218–45.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.1985. ‘The Erection and Mutilation of the Hermai’.The Cambridge Classical Journal31: 47–73.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.1994. ‘Archaeology, the Salaminioi, and the Politics of Sacred Space in Archaic Attica’. In Placing the Gods: Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E and Osborne, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–60.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.1997. ‘The Polis and Its Culture’. In Routledge History of Philosophy, Vol. 1, ed. Taylor, C. C. W.. London: Routledge, 9–46.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.2005a. ‘Ordering Women in Hesiod’s “Catalogue”’. In The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions, ed. Hunter, R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5–24.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.2005b. ‘Urban Sprawl: What Is Urbanization and Why Does it Matter?’ In Mediterranean Urbanization, 800–600 BC, ed. Osborne, R. and Cunliffe., B.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.2009. Greece in the Making, 1200–479 BC. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L.1960. ‘Eleatic Questions’.The Classical Journal10: 84–102.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L.1974. ‘Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D. Garden City, NY: Princeton University Press, 271–93.Google Scholar
Padel, R.1992. In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Page, D. L.1955. The Homeric Odyssey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Page, D. L.1973. Folktales in Homer’s Odyssey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, J.1999. Plato’s Reception of Parmenides. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, J.2009. Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, J. K.1996. ‘The Original Kerameikos of Athens and the Siting of the Classical Agora’.Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies37: 107–29.Google Scholar
Parker, R.1996. Athenian Religion: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Payen, P.1997. Les îles nomades: conquérir et résister dans l’enquête d’Hérodote. Paris: L’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Pellikaan-Engel, M. E.1978. Hesiod and Parmenides: A New View on Their Cosmologies and on Parmenides’ Proem. Amsterdam: Verlag Adolf M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Peradotto, J. C.1990. Man in the Middle Voice: Name and Narration in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perceau, S.2002. La parole vive: communiquer en catalogue dans l’épopée homérique. Paris: Bibliothèque d’études classiques.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, H.1975. Die Stellung des parmenideischen Lehrgedichtes in der epischen Tradition. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Pieri, A.1977. ‘Parmenide e la lingua della tradizione epica greca’.Studi italiani di filologia classica49: 68–103.Google Scholar
Pike, G.1967. ‘Pre-Roman Land Transport in the Western Mediterranean Region’.Man2: 593–605.Google Scholar
Pikoulas, Y. A.1999. ‘The Road-Network of Arkadia’. In Defining Ancient Arkadia, ed. Nielsen, T. H and Roy, J. Copenhagen: Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 248–319.Google Scholar
Pikoulas, Y. A.2007. ‘Travelling by Land in Ancient Greece’. In Travel, Geography and Culture in Ancient Greece, Egypt, and the Near East. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 78–88.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F.1994. ‘Mediation, Competition, and Sovereignty: The Evolution of Rural Sanctuaries in Geometric Greece’. In Placing the Gods: Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece, ed. Alcock, S. E and Osborne, R. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3–18.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F.1995. Cults, Territory, and the Origins of the Greek City-State, trans. J. Lloyd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F.1999. ‘L’installation des dieux et la genèse des cités en Grèce d’occident, une question résolue? Retour à Mégara Hyblaea’. In La colonisation grecque en Méditerranée occidentale. Paris: École Française de Rome, 209–29.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F.2005. ‘Forms and Processes: Some Thoughts on the Meaning of Urbanization in Early Archaic Greece’. In Mediterranean Urbanization, 800–600 BC, ed. Osborne, R and Cunliffe, B. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 45–70.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F.2006. ‘Analyse de l’espace et urbanisations en Grèce archaïque: quelques pistes de recherche récentes’.Revue Études Anciennes108: 203–25.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F.2009. ‘Sanctuaries and Festivals’. In A Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Raaflaub, K. A and van Wees, H. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 427–43.Google Scholar
de Polignac, F.2012. ‘Une “voie héracléenne” en Attique?’ In Le banquet de Pauline Schmitt Pantel: Genre mœurs et politique dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine, ed. Azoulay, V., Gherchanoc, F.