Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:24:21.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Philip L. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How Marriage Became One of the Sacraments
The Sacramental Theology of Marriage from its Medieval Origins to the Council of Trent
, pp. 983 - 1040
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Assisi, MS 138.Google Scholar
Cambridge, St. John’s College, MS 57 (C.7).Google Scholar
London, BL, Harley 3098.Google Scholar
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Laud Misc. 216.Google Scholar
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Laud Misc. 277.Google Scholar
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Lyell 42.Google Scholar
Paris, BnF lat. 14842.Google Scholar
Paris, BnF lat. 16417.Google Scholar
Vat. lat. 1098.Google Scholar
Vat. lat. 4986.Google Scholar
Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Cod. lat. 2718. Bibl. Universidad Granada Caja B-4.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abbo of Fleury. Liber apologeticus. PL 139:461–71.Google Scholar
Acta Reformationis Catholicae ecclesiam Germaniae concernentia saeculi XVI. Die Reformverhandlungen des deutschen Episkopats von 1520 bis 1570. Ed. Pfeilschifter, Georg. 6 vols. Regensburg, 1959–1974.Google Scholar
Aelred of Rievaulx. Opera omnia 3: Sermones 47–84. Ed. Raciti, Gaetano. CCM 2B. Turnhout, 2001.Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus. Opera omnia. Ed. Borgnet, August. 38 vols. Paris, 1890–1899. [“Borgnet edition.”]Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus. Opera Omnia edenda curavit Institutum Alberti Magni Coloniense. Münster, 1951–. [“Cologne edition.”]Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus. De sacramentis, tract. 9: De matrimonio. Ed. Ohlmeyer, A.. Opera omnia, Cologne edition, vol. 26 (1958), 154–70.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Glossa in quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi. Nunc demum reperta atque primum edita studio et cura PP. Collegii s. Bonaventurae. 4 vols. Quaracchi, Florence, 1951–1957.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales. Quaestiones disputatae ‘antequam esset frater.’ Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica Medii Aevi, 19–21. Nunc primum editae studio et cura PP. Collegii s. Bonaventurae. 3 vols. Quaracchi, Florence, 1960.Google Scholar
Ambrose, . De institutione virginis. PL 16.Google Scholar
Ambrosiaster, . Ambrosiastri qui dicitur commentarius in epistulas paulinas. Ed. Vogels, H. J.. CSEL 81.1–3 (1966–1969).Google Scholar
Ambrosiaster, . [Pseudo-Augustine.] Quaestiones veteris et novi testamenti CXXVII. Ed. Souter, A.. CSEL 50 (1908).Google Scholar
Archiv für Literatur- und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters. Ed. Ehrle, Franz and Denifle, Heinrich. 7 vols. Freiburg im Breisgau, etc., 1885–1900.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Bartlett, Robert C. and Collins, Susan D.. Chicago, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, ; Aspasius, ; Michael, . Trans. by Grosseteste, Robert. Aristoteles over de Vriendschap: Boeken VIII en IX van de Nicomachische Ethiek med de commentaren van Aspasius en Michaël in de Latijnse vertaling van Grosseteste. Ed. Stinnisen, Wilfried. Brussels, 1963.Google Scholar
Aspasius, : See also Robert Grosseteste.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Confessiones. CCL 27.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Contra duas epistulas Pelagianorum. CSEL 60.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Contra Faustum Manicheum. CSEL 25.1.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Contra Iulianum. PL 44.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Contra Iulianum opus imperfectum. PL 45.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De adulterinis coniugiis. CSEL 41.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De bono coniugali. CSEL 41.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De bono viduitatis. CSEL 41.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De civitate Dei. CCL 47 (Books I–X), CCL 48 (Books IX–XII).Google Scholar
Augustine, . De continentia. CSEL 41.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De doctrina christiana. CCL 32.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De fide et operibus. CSEL 41.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De Genesi ad litteram. CSEL 28.1.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De Genesi contra Manichaeos. CSEL 91.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De gratia Christi et de peccato originali. CSEL 42.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De moribus ecclesiae et de moribus Manichaeorum. CSEL 90.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De nuptiis et concupiscentia. CSEL 42.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De peccato originali: See De gratia ChristiGoogle Scholar
Augustine, . De peccatorum meritis et remissione peccatorum et de baptismo parvulorum. CSEL 60.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De sancta virginitate. CSEL 41.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De sermone Domini in monte. CCL 35.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Enchiridion. = Liber de fide, spe, et caritate. CCL 46.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Ennarationes in Psalmos. CCL 38–40.Google Scholar
Augustine, . In Ioannis evangelium tractatus. CCL 36.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Quaestiones Evangeliorum. CCL 44B.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Retractationes. CCL 57.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Vingt-six sermons au peuple d’Afrique. Ed. Dolbeau, F.. Paris, 1996.Google Scholar
Avicenna (Ibn Sina): Avicenna Latinus. Liber de philosophia prima sive de scientia divina, V–X. Ed. Riet, S. van. Louvain and Leiden, 1980.Google Scholar
Bandinus, . Sententiarum libri quatuor. PL 192:965–1112.Google Scholar
Banting, H. M. J. (ed.). Two Anglo-Saxon Pontificals (the Egbert and Sidney Sussex Pontificals). Henry Bradshaw Society 104. London, 1989.Google Scholar
Barbaro, Franceso. De re uxoria. Ed. Attilio Gnesotto. Atti e memorie. Accademia patavini de scienze, lettere ed arti, N.S. 32 (1915–1916).Google Scholar
Bellarmine, Robert. Opera omnia, ex editione Veneta. 12 vols. Paris, 1870–1874. [Repr. Frankfurt, 1965.]Google Scholar
Bellarmine, Robert. Disputationes de controversiis christianae fidei adversus hujus temporis haereticos: Controversiarum de sacramento matrimonii liber unicus. In Opera omnia, vol. 5 (1873), pp. 37151.Google Scholar
Benedictus Levita (pseudo-). Collectio capitularium. PL 97:699912.Google Scholar
Bernard of Pavia. Summa Decretalium. Ed. Laspeyres, Ernst Th. Regensburg, 1860. [Repr. Graz, 1956.]Google Scholar
Bonaventure, . Opera omnia. Ed. Fathers of the Collegium s. Bonaventurae. 9 vols. Quaracchi, Florence, 1882–1902.Google Scholar
The booke of the common prayer and administracion of the Sacramentes, and other rites and ceremonies of the Churche: after the Churche of England. London, 1549.Google Scholar
Brenz (Brentius), Iohannes. Libellus casuum quorundam matrimonialium elegantissimus. Basle, 1536.Google Scholar
Breviarium Alaricanum: See Lex Romana Visigothorum.Google Scholar
Burchard of Worms. Decretum. PL 140:5371065.Google Scholar
Cajetan, : See Thomas de Vio Cajetan.Google Scholar
Cano, : See Melchor Cano.Google Scholar
Catharinus, Ambrosius (Lancellotto Politi). De matrimonio quaestiones plures. Published in an addendum to Enarrationes R. P. F. Ambrosii Catharini Politi Senensis archiepiscopi Compsani in quinque priora capita libri Geneseos, cols. 225–62. Rome, 1551–1552. [Repr. in facsimile under the title Enarrationes Assertiones Disputationes, Ridgewood, New Jersey, 1964.]Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Robinson, F. N.. 2nd edition. Boston, 1957.Google Scholar
Codex Theodosianus. Ed. Krueger, Paul, Mommsen, Theodor, Meyer, Paul Martin. 2 vols. Berlin, 1905.Google Scholar
Collectio decem partium. MS Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Cod. lat. 2718.Google Scholar
Collectio Tripartita (ascribed to Ivo of Chartres). Working text, ed. Brett, Martin and Nowak, Przemyslaw, URL: http://project.knowledgeforge.net/ivo/tripartita.html (last accessed June 2, 2013).Google Scholar
Commentarius Cantabrigiensis in Epistolas Pauli e schola Petri Abaelardi. Vol. 2: In Epistolam ad Corinthos, Iam et IIam ad Galatas, et Ephesios. Ed. Landgraf, Artur. Publications in Mediaeval Studies 2. Notre Dame, Indiana, 1939.Google Scholar
Concilium provinciale Coloniense anno 1536 celebratum: Acta Reformationis Catholicae, 2:118–318.Google Scholar
Concilium Tridentinum: Diariorum, actorum, epistularum, tractatuum nova collectio. Edidit Societas Goerresiana Promovendis inter Germanos Catholicos Litterarum Studiis, Friburgi Brisgoviae 1901–.Google Scholar
Corpus Catholicorum. Werke katholischer Schriftsteller im Zeitalter der Glaubensspaltung. Münster in Westfalen, 1919–.Google Scholar
Councils and Synods with Other Documents Relating to the English Church. 2 vols. in 4. Oxford, 1981, 1964. [Vol. 1 (1981), 871–1204, ed. D. Whitelock, M. Brett, and C. N. L. Brooke (Pt. 1, 871–1066; Pt. 2, 1066–1204). Vol. 2 (1964), 1205–1313, ed. F. M. Powicke and C. R. Cheney (Pt. 1, 1205–1265; Pt. 2, 1265–1313).]Google Scholar
Corpus Iuris Canonici. 3 vols. Rome, 1582. [Vol. 1, Decretum Gratiani. Vol. 2, Decretales D. Gregorii Papae IX. Vol. 3, Liber Sextus Decretalium.]Google Scholar
Corpus Iuris Canonici. Ed. Friedberg, Emil. 2 vols. Leipzig, 1879, 1881.Google Scholar
Corpus Iuris Civilis. Ed. Mommsen, Theodore, Krueger, Paul, Schoell, Rudolf, and Kroll, Wilhelm. Institutiones, Digesta: vol. 1, Berlin, 1911. Codex Iustinianus: vol. 2, Berlin, 1906. Novellae: vol. 3, Berlin, 1904.Google Scholar
Cum omnia sacramenta I. In Bliemetzrieder, F. P., Anselms von Laon systematische Sentenzen, BGPhMA 18.2–3 (Münster, 1919), 129–51.Google Scholar
Cum omnia sacramenta II. First part: ed. Weisweiler, H., Das Schrifttum der Schule Anselms von Laon, BGPhMA 33.1–2 (Münster, 1936), 3334. Remainder: ed. F. P. Bliemetzrieder, “Théologie et théologiens de l’école épiscopale de Paris avant Pierre Lombard,” RThAM 3 (1931), 273–91.Google Scholar
De coniugiis tractantibus. Ed. Bliemetzrieder, F. P., “Paul Fournier und das literarische Werk Ivos von Chartres,” at 73–78.Google Scholar
De coniugiis tractantibus. MS British Library, Harley 3098, 72r–74v.Google Scholar
Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. 2 vols. London, 1990. (Latin text from G. Alberigo et al., Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Decreta, with parallel English translations by Norman P. Tanner.) [Cited as Tanner-Alberigo.]Google Scholar
Decretales Gregorii IX (Liber extra). In Corpus Iuris Canonici, vol. 2. [Cited as X.]Google Scholar
Decretum Dei fuit. Ed. Weisweiler, H., Das Schrifttum der Schule Anselms von Laon, BGPhMA 33.1–2 (Münster, 1936), 361–79.Google Scholar
Delfini, Giovanni Antonio. De clandestino matrimonio. CT 13.1:7281.Google Scholar
Delfini, Giovanni Antonio. De matrimonio et caelibatu. Camerini, 1553.Google Scholar
Delfini, Giovanni Antonio. De potestate ecclesiastica. Venice, 1549.Google Scholar
Denifle, Heinrich and Ehrle, Franz (eds.). Archiv für Litteratur- und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters. 7 vols. Berlin, 1885–1900. [Repr. Graz, 1955–1956.]Google Scholar
Dennis, Andrew, Foote, Peter, and Perkins, Richard (eds. and trans.). Laws of Early Iceland, Grágás: The Codex Regius of Grágás, with Material from other Manuscripts. University of Manitoba Icelandic Studies 3 and 5. Winnipeg, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzinger-Schönmetzer, : See Enchiridion Symbolurum, Definitionum et Declarationum.Google Scholar
Domingo de Soto, . In quartum librum Sententiarum. 2 vols. Salamanca, 1566–1579.Google Scholar
Durandus of Saint-Pourçain (Durandus de Sancto Porciano). In Petri Lombardi Sententias theologicas commentariorum libri quatuor. Venice, 1571.Google Scholar
,: See Corpus Iuris Canonici. Rome, 1582.Google Scholar
Écrits théologiques de l’École d’Abélard. Textes inédits. Ed. Landgraf, Arthur. Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, Études et Documents 14. Louvain, 1934.Google Scholar
Ehrle, Franz. “Zur Vorgeschichte des Concils von Vienne.” In Archiv für Literatur- und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters, vol. 2. Berlin, 1886.Google Scholar
Enchiridion Symbolorum, Definitionum et Declarationum de rebus fidei et morum. Ed. Denzinger, Heinrich and Schönmetzer, Adolf. 34th edition. Barcelona, 1965. [Cited as DS]Google Scholar
Enchiridion christianae institutionis in Consilio prouinciali Coloniensi editum: See Gropper.Google Scholar
Enarrationes in Matthaeum. PL 162:1227–1500.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Christiani matrimonii institutio. Ed. A. G. Weiler (2008). ASD V.6:1–252.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami Opera omnia. Ed. Leclerc, Jean. Leyden, 1703–1706. [Repr. Hildesheim, 1961–1962.] [Abbr. LB.]Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Opera omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterodami. Amsterdam, 1969–2008, and Leiden, 2009–. [“Amsterdam edition,” abbr. ASD.]Google Scholar
Estius, Guillelmus (Willem Hessels van Est). In Quatuor libros Sententiarum commentaria. 6 vols. Venice, 1777–1778.Google Scholar
Fecit Deus hominem [marriage treatise included in the Sententiae Berolineses]: In Stegmüller, “Sententie Berolineses,” RThAM 11 (1939), 56–61.Google Scholar
Florensz, Adrian, of Utrecht (Hadrian VI). Quaestiones de sacramentis in Quartum Sententiarum librum. Rome, 1522.Google Scholar
Formulae Merowingici et Karolini Aevi. MGH Leges, sect. V. Ed. Zeumer, Karl. 1882–1886.Google Scholar
Gandulph of Bologna. Magistri Gandulphi Bononiensis Sententiarum libri quatuor. Ed. de Walter, Ioannes. Vienna and Breslau, 1924.Google Scholar
Giberti, Giovanni Matteo. Jo. Matthaei Giberti Episcopi Veronensis Ecclesiasticae Disciplinae ante Tridentinam Synodum instauratoris solertissimi Opera . . . Editio altera auctior, & emendatior. Ostiglia, 1740.Google Scholar
Giberti, Giovanni Matteo. Constitutiones Gibertinae cum animadversionibus Cardinalis Augustini Valerii, aliorumque Episcoporum Vernonsium. In Opera (1740), 1–152.Google Scholar
Goffredus de Trano, . Summa super titulis Decretalium. Lyon, 1519. [Repr. Aalen, 1968.]Google Scholar
Gomes, Gulielmus [William] Z. De matrimoniis clandestinis in Concilio Tridentino: cum appendice de forma celebrationis matrimonii apud Indos. Rome, 1950.Google Scholar
González de Mendoza, Pedro. Lo sucedido en el concilio de Trento desde el año 1561 hasta que se acabó. CT 2:635719.Google Scholar
Gratian, . Concordia discordantium canonum (Decretum). In Corpus Iuris Canonici. Ed. Friedberg, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Gregory I, Pope (?). Libellus Responsionum (= Per dilectissimos filios meos). MGH Epistolae (in Quart) 2, = Gregorii I papae Registrum epistolarum, vol. 2 (1892–1899), Epist. 11.56a, pp. 332–43.Google Scholar
Gregory of Tours. Libri historiarum X. Ed. Krusch, Bruno and Levison, Wilhelm. MGH Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum, vol. 1.1 (1937–1951).Google Scholar
Gropper, Johann. Enchiridion christianae institutionis in Consilio prouinciali Coloniensi editum, opus omnibus verae pietatis cultoribus longe vtilissimum. Paris, 1550.Google Scholar
Guerrero, Pedro. Tractatus de matrimoniis clandestinis. MS Biblioteca Universitaria de Granada, Caja B-4, 346r–383v. [Edited in J. López Martín, “El voto de Don Pedro Guerrero,” 155–219.]Google Scholar
Guerric of Saint-Quentin, Quaestio disputata de matrimonio. MS Paris, BnF lat. 16417, 63ra–63va. MS Assisi 138, 155ra–156va.Google Scholar
Guido of Monte Rochen. Manipulus curatorum. Novissime parisius impressus et emendatus. Paris, 1501.Google Scholar
Guy of Orchelles (Guido de Orchellis). Tractatus de sacramentis ex eius Summa de sacramentis et officiis ecclesiae. Ed. Damian, and Van den Eynde, Odulph. Franciscan Institute Publications, Text Series no. 4. St. Bonaventure, N.Y., 1953.Google Scholar
Hadrian VI, Pope: See Florensz.Google Scholar
Henry, VIII. Assertio septem sacramentorum adversus Martinum Lutherum. Ed. Fraenkel, Pierre. Corpus Catholicorum, vol. 43. Münster, 1992.Google Scholar
Hervet, Gentian. De matrimoniis clandestinis. CT 13.1:145–59.Google Scholar
Hervet, Gentian. Oratio ad Concilium qua suadetur, ne matrimonia quae contrahuntur a filiis familias sine consensu eorum in quorum sunt potestate, habeantur deinceps pro legitimis. Paris, 1556.Google Scholar
Hostiensis. Summa aurea. Venice, 1574. [Repr. Turin, 1963.]Google Scholar
Hincmar of Reims. Epistolae: Die Briefe des Erzbischofs Hinkmar von Reims (Hincmari Archiepiscopi Remensis Epistolae), vol. 1. Ed. Perels, Ernst, 1939. MGH Epistolae 8.1, = Epistolae Karolini Aevi 6.1.Google Scholar
Hinschius, Paul (ed.). Decretales Pseudo-Isidorianae et Capitula Angilramni. Leipzig, 1863. [Repr. Aalen, 1963.]Google Scholar
Hugh of Saint-Cher (Hugo de sancto caro). Commentarius in libros I-IV Sententiarum. MS Vat. lat. 1098.Google Scholar
Hugh of Saint-Cher (Hugo de sancto caro). Postillae in totam Bibliam: In Biblia Latina continens textum bibliae cum postilla domini Hugonis Cardinalis. 6 vols. Basel, 1504.Google Scholar
Hugh of Saint-Victor. De arrha animae. Ed. Feiss, H. B. and Sicard, P. in L’oeuvre de Hugues de Saint-Victor, 1: De institutione novitiorum; De virtute orandi; De laude caritatis; De arrha animae. Ed. H. B. Feiss et P. Sicard. French translation by D. Poirel, H. Rochais, and P. Sicard. Introductions, notes, and appendices by D. Poirel. Sous la règle de saint Augustin series. Turnhout, 1997.Google Scholar
Hugh of Saint-Victor. De beatae Mariae virginitate: Ed. Sicard, Patrice (from MS Troyes 301) in L’oeuvre de Hugues de Saint-Victor, 2: Super Canticum Mariae; Pro Assumptione Virginis; De beatae Mariae virginitate; Egredietur virga, Maria porta. With introduction, notes, and French translation by Bernadette Jollès. Sous la règle de saint Augustin series. Turnhout, 2000.Google Scholar
Hugh of Saint-Victor. De sacramentis christianae fidei. PL 176:173–618.Google Scholar
Hugh of Saint-Victor. De sacramentis christianae fidei. Ed. Berndt, Rainer. Corpus Victorinum, vol. 1. Monasterium Westfalorum, 2008.Google Scholar
Huguccio, , Summa, C. 27 q. 2: In Roman, “Summa d’Huguccio.”Google Scholar
Huius sacramenti habemus. Ed. Lottin, O., “Une tradition spéciale du texte des Sententiae divinae paginae,” in Studia Mediaevalia in honorem admodum Reverendi Patris Raymundi Josephi Martin (Bruges, 1948), 147–69, at 160–61. Repr. in Lottin, PsM V, 365–68 (PM 527–28).Google Scholar
In coniugio figura et vestigium trinitatis. In Bliemetzrieder, F. P., Anselms von Laon systematische Sentenzen, BGPhMA 18.2–3 (Münster, 1919), 112–13.Google Scholar
In primis hominibus. In Matecki, Der Traktat In primis hominibus. [IPH]Google Scholar
Innocent III, Pope. Between God and Man: Six Sermons on the Priestly Office. Translated with an introduction by Vause, Corinne J. and Gardiner, Frank C.. Washington, D.C., 2004.Google Scholar
Innocent III, Pope. De quadripartita specie nuptiarum liber. Ed. and trans. in Munk, A Study of Pope Innocent III’s Treatise. [Also PL 217:921–68.]Google Scholar
Innocent III, Pope. De quatuor speciebus desponsationum. Ed. and trans. in Munk, A Study of Pope Innocent III’s Treatise. [Also PL 217:659–66.]Google Scholar
Innocent III, Pope. Die Register Innocenz’ III. Ed. Hageneder, Othmar et al., Publikationen des Historischen Instituts beim Österreichischen Kulturinstitut in Rom. Graz, 1964–.Google Scholar
Innocent III, Pope. Epistolae. PL 214–216.Google Scholar
Innocent V, Pope: See Peter of Tarentaise.Google Scholar
Ioannes Maior, . Quartus in Sententiarum. Paris, 1509.Google Scholar
Iohannes de Fonte, : See Hamesse, Les Auctoritates Aristotelis, under secondary literature.Google Scholar
Isaac of Stella, . Sermons. Tome 1. Ed. Hoste, Anselm. Trans. Salet, Gaston. SC 130. Paris, 1967.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville. De ecclesiasticis officiis. Ed. Lawson, C. M.. CCL 113. Turnhout, 1989.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville. The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville. Trans. with introduction and notes by Barney, Stephen A. et al. Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville. Etymologiarum sive originum libri XX. Ed. Lindsay, W. M.. 2 vols. Oxford, 1911.Google Scholar
Julian, . Projet Volterra, “The Epitome of Julian,” ed. Corcoran, Simon, URL: www.ucl.ac.uk/history2/volterra/julianintro.htm#volt (accessed June 13, 2013). [This web edition is based on Iuliani Epitome Latina Novellarum Iustiniani, ed. Hänel, Gustav F.. Leipzig, 1873.]Google Scholar
Ivo of Chartres. Decretum. Working text ed. Brett, Martin and Brasington, Bruce, URL: http://project.knowledgeforge.net/ivo/decretum.html (accessed June 2, 2013).Google Scholar
Ivo of Chartres. Epistolae. PL 162:11D–288.Google Scholar
Jacques de Vitry, . Historia occidentalis. Hinnebusch, John F. (ed.). The Historia Occidentalis of Jacques de Vitry: A Critical Edition. Spicilegium Friburgense, Texts Concerning the History of Christian Life 17. Fribourg, Switzerland, 1972.Google Scholar
Jaffé, Philipp (ed.). Regesta pontificum romanorum ab condita ecclesia ad annum post Christum natum MCXCVIII. 2nd edition, revised by Loewenfeld, S., Kaltenbrunner, F., and Ewald, P. W.. Leipzig, 18851888. [Abbr. JL]Google Scholar
Jerome, . Adversus Helvidium de Mariae virginitate perpetua. PL 23:183–206.Google Scholar
Jerome, . Adversus Iovinianum. PL 23:211–338.Google Scholar
Jerome, . Commentariorum in Mattheum. CCL 77.Google Scholar
Johannes de Fonte, , Parvi flores: See Hamesse, Les Auctoritates Aristotelis.Google Scholar
John Duns Scotus, . Opera omnia. Editio nova iuxta editionem Waddingi XII tomos continentiam. 26 vols. Paris, 1891–1895. [“Vivès edition.”]Google Scholar
John Duns Scotus, . Opus Oxoniense. In Opera omnia, Vivès edition, vols 8–21.Google Scholar
John Duns Scotus, . Reportatio Parisiensis (Reportata Parisiensia). In Opera omnia, Vivès edition, vols 22–24.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. The Letters of John of Salisbury. Ed. Millor, W. J. and Butler, Harold E., revised by Brooke, C. N. L.. 2 vols. Oxford, 1986, 1979.Google Scholar
Jonas of Orléans. De institutione laicali: Instruction des Laïcs. Ed. Dubreucq, Odile. SC 549, 550. Paris, 2012, 2013.Google Scholar
Julian, : See Iulianus.Google Scholar
Lactantius, . Epitome. CSEL 19.Google Scholar
Politi, Lancellotto: See Catharinus.Google Scholar
Landgraf, Arthur (ed.). Écrits théologiques de l’école d’Abélard. Textes inédits. Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, Études et Documents 14. Louvain, 1934.Google Scholar
Leander of Seville. Regula, sive liber de institutione virginum et contemptu mundi, ad Florentinam sororem. PL 72:871–894.Google Scholar
Leo I, Pope. Epistolae. PL 54:551–1218.Google Scholar
Le Plat, Judocus [Josse] (ed.). Monumentorum ad historiam concilii Tridentini potissimum illustrandam spectantium amplissima collectio. 7 vols. Louvain, 17811787.Google Scholar
Lex Romana Visigothorum. Ed. Hänel, Gustav F. (Haenel). Leipzig, 1848. [Repr. Aalen, 1962.] [Abbr. Brev.]Google Scholar
Leges Visigothorum. Ed. Zeumer, Karl. MGH Leges Nationum Germanicarum (= Leges, sect. I), vol. 1 (1902).Google Scholar
Liber pancrisis. MS London, BL, Harley 3098, 1r–91v.Google Scholar
Littera septem sigillorum: See Fussenegger.Google Scholar
Lorich, Gerhard. Institutio catholica fidei orthodoxae et religionis sanae. Frankfurt, 1536.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. D. Martin Luthers Werke: kritische Gesammtausgabe, Schriften. Weimar, 1883–1948. [“Weimarer Ausgabe,” abbr. WA.]Google Scholar
Major, John: See Ioannes Maior.Google Scholar
Mansi, Jean-Dominique. Sacrorum Conciliorum Nova et Amplissima Collectio. 31 vols. Venice, 1759–1798.Google Scholar
Martène, Edmond. De antiquis ecclesiae ritibus libri ex variis insigniorum ecclesiarum: pontificalibus, sacramentoriis, missalibus, breviariis, ritualibus, seu manualibus, ordinariis se consuetudinariis, cum manuscriptis tum editis. 4 vols. Antwerp. 1736–1738.Google Scholar
Martène, Edmond and Ursin, Durand (eds.). Veterum scriptorum et monumentorum historicorum, dogmaticorum, moralium, amplissima collectio. Paris, 1724. [Repr. New York, 1968.]Google Scholar
Martinus, Magister. Compilatio quaestionum theologiae, treatise on the sacraments: In J. A. Hall, The Sacraments in the Compilatio questionum theologie.Google Scholar
McSheffrey, Shannon (introduction and translations by). Love and Marriage in Late Medieval London. TEAMS Documents of Practice series. Kalamazoo, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano, Melchor. Opera, in hac primum editione clarius divisa. Bassano, 1746. [De locis theologicis: pp. 1457.]Google Scholar
Cano, Melchor. De locis theologicis. Texto de la editio princeps [Salamanca, 1563] preparado pro Juan Belda. Documenta Catholica Omnia, URL: www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/1509-1560,_Cano_Melchior,_De_Locis_Theologicis,_LT.pdf (accessed April 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Missale Romanum ex decreto sacrosancti Concilii Tridentini restitutum, S. Pii V. Pontificis Maximi jussu editum, Clementis VIII. et Urbani VIII. auctoritate recognitum. Regensburg, 1862.Google Scholar
Ordines Coronationis Franciae: Texts and Ordines for the Coronation of Frankish and French Kings and Queens in the Middle Ages. Ed. Jackson, Richard A.. 2 vols. Philadelphia, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas I, Pope. Epist. 99 (Responsa ad consulta Bulgarorum). Ed. Perels, Ernst. MGH Epistolae (in quart.), t. 6, = Epistolae Karolini Aevi 4 (1925), 568–600.Google Scholar
Nicholas of Clairvaux, Sermo in dedicatione ecclesiae: Published as Peter Damian, Sermo 69, PL 144:897–902.Google Scholar
Paludanus, : See Peter of La Palu.Google Scholar
Panormia (ascribed to Ivo of Chartres). Working text ed. Brett, Martin and Brasington, Bruce, URL: http://project.knowledgeforge.net/ivo/panormia.html (accessed June 2, 2013).Google Scholar
Paucapalea, , Summa: Summa über das Decretum Gratiani. Ed. von Schulte, Johann F.. Giessen, 1890. [Repr. Aalen, 1965.]Google Scholar
Abelard, Peter. Sententiae (formerly known as Sententiae Hermanni). In Abaelardus, Petrus, Opera Theologica VI: Sententie – Librum Sententiarum. Ed. Luscombe, D. E., Barrow, J., Burnett, C., Keats-Rohan, K. S. B., and Mews, C. J.. CCM 14 (2006).Google Scholar
Olivi, Peter John. De perfectione evangelica, Q. 6: An virginitas sit simpliciter melior matrimonio. In Emmen, “Verginità e matrimonio,” 21–57.Google Scholar
Olivi, Peter John. Responsio fratris P. Ioannis ad aliqua dicta per quosdam magistros parisienses de suis Quaestionibus excerpta (Responsio secunda, 1285). Ed. Laberge, D., “Fr. Petri Ioannis Olivi, O.F.M., tria scripta,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 28 (1935), at 130–35, 374–407.Google Scholar
Olivi, Peter John. Responsio quam fecit Petrus Ioannis ad litteram magistrorum sibi praesentatum in Avinione [= Responsio prima, 1283]. Ed. Laberge, Damasus, “Fr. Petri Ioannis Olivi, O.F.M., tria scripta,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 28 (1935), at 126–30.Google Scholar
Olivi, Peter John. Tractatus de sacramentis. MS Vat. lat. 4986, 128r–156v.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Collectanea in epistolas s. Pauli. PL 191:1297–1696, PL 192:9–520.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Sententiae in IV libris distinctae. 2 vols (tom. 1, pars 2; tom. 2). Spicilegium Bonaventurianum 4–5. Grottaferrata (Rome), 1971, 1981.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Sententiae in IV libris distinctae (tom. 1, pars 1): Prolegomena. Spicilegium Bonaventurianum 4. Grottaferrata (Rome), 1971.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. The Sentences. Translated and annotated by Silano, Giulio. 4 vols. Toronto, 2007–2010.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Tractatus de coniugio. In Sententiae in IV libris distinctae (Grottaferrata edition), 2:84*–87*. [Also PL 191:1585D–1587B.]Google Scholar
Peter of Aquila (Scotellus). Commentaria in quatuor Libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi. Ed. Paolini, Cypriano. 4 vols. Levanto, 1907–1909.Google Scholar
Peter of La Palu (Petrus Paludanus, Petrus de Palude). Scriptum in quartum Sententiarum. Venice, 1493.Google Scholar
Peter of Poitiers. Sententiarum libri quinque. PL 211:789–1280.Google Scholar
Peter of Tarentaise (Pope Innocent V). In IV librum Sententiarum commentaria. 4 vols. Toulouse, 1649–1652.Google Scholar
Peter the Chanter (Petrus Cantor, Peter of Hordenc). Summa de sacramentis et animae consiliis. Ed. Dugauquier, Jean-Albert. 3 vols. in 5. Louvain, 1954–1967.Google Scholar
Peter the Chanter (Petrus Cantor, Peter of Hordenc). Verbum Adbreviatum: Textus Conflatus. Ed. Boutry, Monique. CCM 196. Turhout, 2004Google Scholar
Philip of Harveng. De institutione clericorum. PL 203:665–1206.Google Scholar
Praepositinus, . Praepositini Cancellarii de Sacramentis et de novissimis (Summae Theologicae Pars Quarta). Ed. Pilarczyk, Daniel E.. Collectio Urbiana, Series III, Textus ac Documenta 7. Rome, 1964.Google Scholar
Quinque compilationes antiquae nec non Collection canonum Lipsiensis. Ed. Friedberg, E. Emil. Leipzig, 1882. [Repr. Graz, 1956.] [Cited as Comp.]Google Scholar
Raymond of Penyafort. Summa de poenitentia et matrimonio. Rome, 1603.Google Scholar
Raymond of Penyafort. Summa on Marriage. Translated with an Introduction by Pierre Payer. Medieval Sources in Translation 41. Toronto, 2005. Rome, 1964.Google Scholar
Das Regensburger Buch: Acta Reformationis Catholicae, 6:21–88.Google Scholar
Richard de Mediavilla. Super quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi quaestiones. Brescia, 1591. [Repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1963.]Google Scholar
Regesta pontificum romanorum [abbr. JL]: See Jaffé.Google Scholar
Courson, Robert. Quaestio de matrimonio (from his Summa). In Malherbe, Le mariage au début du XIIIème siècle d’après la Summa du cardinal Robert de Courson. [Note: A section from the same treatise is edited in Baldwin, Language of Sex, Appendix 1, 239–45.]Google Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert (trans.). The Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle in the Latin Translation of Robert Grosseteste, Bishop of Lincoln († 1253), vol. 3: The Anonymous Commentator on Book VII, Aspasius on Book VIII, and Michael of Ephesus on Books IX and X. Critical edition with an introductory study by Paul, H. Mercken, F.. Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum 6.1. Louvain, 1991.Google Scholar
Paululus, Robert. De ceremoniis, sacramentis, officiis et observantibus ecclesiasticis. PL 177:381–456.Google Scholar
Pullen, Robert. Sententiarum libri octo. PL 186:639–1010.Google Scholar
Rolandus of Bologna. De coniugio. Ed. Thaner, Friedrich, Summa magistri Rolandi mit Anghang Incerti auctoris quaestiones, pp. 115234. Innsbruck, 1872–1874. [Repr. Aalen, 1973.]Google Scholar
Rolandus of Bologna. Sententiae. Ed. Gietl, Ambrosius M.. Die Sentenzen Rolands nachmals Papstes Alexander III. Freiburg im Breisgau, 1891. [Repr. Amsterdam, 1969.]Google Scholar
Rufinus, . Summa decretorum. Ed. Singer, Heinrich. Paderborn, 1902.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Thomas. Disputationum de sancto matrimonio libri decem. 3 vols. Venice, 1612.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Thomas. De essentia et consensu matrimonio in genere, = Disputationum de sancto matrimonio, Book II, in vol. 1, pp. 145–220.Google Scholar
Scotus, : See John Duns Scotus.Google Scholar
Sentences of Sextus. Ed. Wilson, Walter T.. Atlanta, 2012. [Earlier edition by H. Chadwick, The Sentences of Sextus.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sententiae Atrebatenses. In Lottin, “Les Sententiae Atrebatenses”; and in PsM V, 400–440.Google Scholar
Sententiae Atrebatenses, marriage treatise from: In Lottin, “Les Sententiae Atrebatenses” and in PsM V, 434–39.Google Scholar
Sententiae Berolinenses. In Stegmüller, “Sententie Berolinenses,” RThAM 11.Google Scholar
Sententiae divinae paginae, marriage treatise from: In Lottin, “Une tradition spéciale,” (1948), 160–64; and in PsM V, nos. 527–28.Google Scholar
Sententiae divinitatis. In Geyer, Die Sententiae divinitatis: Ein Sentenzenbuch der Gilbertschen Schule, BGPhM 7.2–3. Münster, 1909.Google Scholar
Sententiae Magistri A., De matrimonio. In Reinhardt, Die Ehelehre, 135 ff. [Abbr. SMA]Google Scholar
Sententiae magistri Petri Abelardi. CCM 14.Google Scholar
Sententiae Parisienses. In Landgraf, Écrits théologiques de l’école d’Abélard, 3–60.Google Scholar
Sextus: See Sentences of Sextus.Google Scholar
Simon, Master. Tractatus magistri Simonis de sacramentis. Ed. Weisweiler, , Maître Simon et son groupe De sacramentis, 1–81.Google Scholar
Simon of Tournai. Les Disputationes de Simon de Tournai. Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, Études et Documents, 12. Ed. Warichez, Joseph. Louvain, 1932.Google Scholar
Simon of Bisignano. Summa in Decretum. Ed. Aimone, Pier V.. Fribourg, 2007. URL: www.unifr.ch/cdc/summa_simonis_de.php (accessed June 3, 2013).Google Scholar
Siricius, Pope. Epistolae et decreta. PL 13:1132–96.Google Scholar
Langton, Stephen. Der Sentenzenkommentar des Kardinals Stephan Langton. Ed. Landgraf, A. M.. BGPhThMA 37.1. Münster, 1952.Google Scholar
Langton, Stephen. Quaestiones theologiae. Cambridge, St. John’s College, MS 57 (C.7) and Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Lyell 42.Google Scholar
Stephen of Tournai (Stephan von Doornick, Stephanus Tornaciensis). Die Summa über das Decretum Gratiani. Ed. von Schulte, Johann F.. Giessen, 1891. [Repr. Aalen, 1965.]Google Scholar
Stephen of Tournai (Stephan von Doornick, Stephanus Tornaciensis). Summa: Prologus. Ed. Kalb, H., Studien zur Summa Stephans von Tournai, 113–20.Google Scholar
Suarez, Franciscus. Commentariorum ac disputationum in tertiam partem divi Thomae. 5 vols. Mainz, 1616–1619.Google Scholar
Summa Coloniensis: See Summa “Elegantius in iure diuino” seu Coloniensis.Google Scholar
Summa de sacramentis “totus homo”. Spicilegium Pontificii Athenaei Antoniani 7. Ed. Betti, Umberto. Rome, 1955.Google Scholar
Summa ‘Elegantius in iure diuino’ seu Coloniensis. Ed. Fransen, Gérard and Kuttner, Stephan. Monumenta Iuris Canonici, Series A: Corpus Glossatorum. 4 vols. New York, 1969; Vatican City, 1978, 1986, and 1990.Google Scholar
Summa sententiarum. [Odo of Lucca?] PL 176:41–174.Google Scholar
Summa Parisiensis: The Summa Parisiensis on the Decretum Gratiani. Ed. McLaughlin, Terence P.. Toronto, 1952.Google Scholar
Sylvius, Franciscus (François de Bois). Commentarii in tertiam partem s. Thomae Aquinatis . . . et in eiusdem supplementum. 2 vols. Douai, 1645.Google Scholar
Tancred, . Summa de matrimonio. Ed. Wunderlich, Agathon. Göttingen, 1841.Google Scholar
Tapper, Ruard. Ruardi Tapperi ab Enchusia . . . Opera. 2 vols. Cologne, 1582–1583. [Repr. Ridgewood, N.J., 1962.]Google Scholar
Tapper, Ruard. Explicatio articulorum venerandae Facultatis Sacrae Theologiae Generalis Studii Louaniens[is] circa dogmata ecclesiastica ab annis triginta quatuor controversa, una cum responsione ad argumenta adversariorum. 2 vols. Louvain, 1555–1557.Google Scholar
Tapper, Ruard. Explicatio Articulorum viginti, venerandae facultatis Sacrae Theologiae Generalis studii Lovaniensis, circa dogmata Ecclesiastica, nostro hoc tempore controuersa, vna cum responsione ad argumenta aduersariorum. In Tapper, Opera.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . De virginibus velandis. CCL 2.Google Scholar
Tertullian, . Le mariage unique (De monogamia). Texte critique et traduction de Paul Mattei. SC 343. Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Doctoris angelici divi Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia. Ed. Fretté, S. E. and Maré, P.. 34 vols. Paris, 1871–1880. [“Vivès edition.”]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De articulis fidei et ecclesiae sacramentis ad archiepiscopum Panormitanum. Opera omnia, Leonine edition, 42:245–57.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Expositio et lectura super epistolas S. Pauli. Ed. Cai, Raphael. 2 vols. Turin and Rome, 1953.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Sancti Thomae Aquinatis doctoris angelici Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita. Rome, 1882– [“Leonine edition.”]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum. In Opera omnia, Vivès edition, vols 7–11. [Vol. 11 cited here for IV Sent. 23 ff. ]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super Sententiis. Ed. Mandonnet, P. and Moos, M. F.. 4 vols in 5. Paris, 1929–1947. [Cited for Book II Sent. through IV Sent. 22, where the edition ceases.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Sententia Libri Ethicorum. In Opera omnia, Leonine edition, vol. 47.1–2.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra Gentiles. In Opera omnia, Leonine edition, vols 13–15.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae. 5 vols. Ottawa, 1941–1945.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Thomas de Vio. Quaestiones de sacramentis. In Thomas Aquinas, Opera omnia, Leonine edition, 12:341–75. [De sacramento matrimonii triplex quaesitum: ibid., 370–73.]Google Scholar
Thomas of Chobham. Summa confessorum. Ed. Broomfield, F.. Analecta Mediaevalia Numurcensia 25. Louvain, 1965.Google Scholar
Tobit: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary by Moore, Carey E.. Anchor Bible 40A. New York, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tractatus de coniugio (anon.) Ed. Weisweiler, , Maître Simon et son groupe De sacramentis, 99–102.Google Scholar
Tractatus de septem sacramentis ecclesiae (anon.) Ed. Weisweiler, , Maître Simon et son groupe De sacramentis, 82–98.Google Scholar
Ubertino da Casale. Responsio ad predictum libellum diffamatorium. 377–416Google Scholar
Vacarius, , Summa de matrimonio. Ed. Maitland, F. W., “Vacarius on Marriage (Text).” Law Quarterly Review 13 (1887): 270–87.Google Scholar
Vázquez, Gabriel. Commentariorum ac disputationum in [partes] sancti Thomae. 8 vols. Alcalá, 1598–1615. / Commentariorum ac disputationum in tertiam partem sancti Thomae, tomus secundus: Vol. 6 (1611). / Commentariorum ac disputationum in tertiam partem sancti Thomae, tomus quartus: vol. 8, 1615.Google Scholar
Vázquez, Gabriel. Tractatus de sacramento matrimonii inchoatus. In Commentariorum ac disputationum in tertiam partem sancti Thomae, tomus quartus (vol. 8, 1615), pp. 466566.Google Scholar
Walter of Mortagne. De coniugio. PL 176:153–174.Google Scholar
William of Auvergne. Opera omnia. Ed. Hotot, F., with supplement ed. Le Feron, Blaise. 2 vols. Orléans and Paris, 1674. [Repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1963.]Google Scholar
William of Auvergne. De sacramento matrimonii. In Opera omnia, 1:512–28.Google Scholar
William of Auvergne. De sacramento matrimonii. MS Paris BnF lat. 14842, 173r–201v.Google Scholar
William of Auxerre. Summa aurea. Spicilegium Bonaventurianum 1620. Ed. Ribaillier, Jean. Paris and Grottaferrata, 1980–1987.Google Scholar
,. In Landgraf, Écrits théologiques de l’école d’Abélard, 63–285.Google Scholar
Abellán, Pedro M. El fin y la signifación sacramental del matrimonio desde S. Anselmo hasta Guillermo de Auxerre. Granada, 1939.Google Scholar
Abellán, Pedro M.La doctrina matrimonial de Hugo de San Caro.” Archivo Teológico Granadino 1 (1938): 2756.Google Scholar
Abusch, Tzvi (ed.). Riches Hidden in Secret Places: Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Memory of Thorkild Jacobsen. Winona Lake, Indiana, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord. Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Oxford, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adnès, Pierre. Le mariage. Tournai, 1963.Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. and Speer, Andreas (eds.). Was ist Philosophie in Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au moyen âge? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? Akten des X. Internationalen Kongresses für Mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Etude de la Philosophie Médiévale, 25. bis 30. August 1997 in Erfurt. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 26. Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
Alesandro, John A. Gratian’s Notion of Marital Consummation. Rome, 1971.Google Scholar
Allen, Prudence. The Concept of Woman: The Aristotelian Revolution 750 BC–AD 1250. Montréal, 1985.Google Scholar
Althaus, Paul. The Ethics of Martin Luther. Trans. Schultz, R. C.. Philadelphia, 1965.Google Scholar
d’Alverny, Marie Thérèse. “Comment les théologiens et les philosophes voient la femme.” Cahiers de civilization médiévale 20 (1977): 105–28.Google Scholar
Alves Pereira, Bernard. La Doctrine du mariage selon saint Augustin. Paris, 1930.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gary. “Celibacy or Consummation in the Garden? Reflections on Early Medieval and Christian Interpretations of the Garden of Eden.” Harvard Theological Review 82 (1989): 121–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Per, Salonen, Kirsi, Sigh, Heller Møller, and Vogt, Helle (eds.). Law and Marriage in Medieval and Early Modern Times. Proceedings of the Eighth Carlsberg Academy Conference on Medieval Legal History 2011. Copenhagen, 2012.Google Scholar
Andrée, Alexander. “Anselm of Laon Unveiled: The Glosae super Iohannem and the Origins of the Glossa Ordinaria on the Bible.” Mediaeval Studies 73 (2011): 217–60.Google Scholar
Andrée, Alexander. “Laon Revisited: Master Anselm and the Creation of a Theological School in the Twelfth Century.” Journal of Medieval Latin 22 (2012): 257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Frances, Egger, Christoph, and Rousseau, Constance M. (eds.). Pope, Church and City: Essays in Honour of Brenda M. Bolton. Leiden, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anné, Lucien. Les rites des fiançailles et la donation pour cause de mariage sous le Bas-Empire. Louvain, 1941.Google Scholar
Anné, Lucien. “La conclusion du mariage dans la tradition et le droit de l’Église latine jusqu’au VIe siècle.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 12 (1935): 513–50.Google Scholar
Antoine, Philippe. Le mariage. Droit canonique et coutumes africaines. Théologie historique 90. Paris, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, Elizabeth. Incest and the Medieval Imagination. Oxford, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnórsdóttir, Agnes S. Property and Virginity: The Christianization of Marriage in Medieval Iceland 1200–1600. Aarhus, 2010.Google Scholar
Arnórsdóttir, Agnes S. “Marriage Contracts in Medieval Iceland.” THTH 360–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert, Jean-Marie. La femme. Antiféminism et christianisme. Paris, 1975.Google Scholar
Aubert, Jean-Marie. “Sacramentalité et réalité humaine du mariage.” Review de droit canonique 30 (1980): 140–50.Google Scholar
Augustinus, Magister. Congrès international augustinien (1954: Paris, France). 3 vols. Paris, 1954–1955.Google Scholar
Aurell, Martin (ed.). Les stratégies matrimoniales (IXe–XIIIe siècle). Histoires de famille. La parenté au moyen âge 14. Turnout, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L’aveu. Antiquité et Moyen Âge. Actes de la table ronde de Rome (28–30 mars 1984). Rome, 1986.Google Scholar
Avignon, Carole. “Marché matrimonial clandestin et officines de clandestinité à la fin du Moyen Âge: l’exemple du diocèse de Rouen.” Revue Historique 312.3 (2010): 515–49.Google Scholar
Aymans, Winfried, Egler, Anna, and Listl, Joseph (eds.). Fides et ius: Festschrift für Georg May zum 65. Geburtstag. Regensburg, 1991.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis. “Measure, Number, and Weight.” In Fitzgerald, Augustine through the Ages, 550–52.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Bernard S. and Nicholas, David (eds.). Law, Custom, and the Social Fabric in Medieval Europe: Essays in Honor of Bryce Lyon. Kalamazoo, 1990.Google Scholar
Baciocchi, J. de. “Structure sacramentaire du mariage.” Nouvelle revue théologique 74 (1952): 916–29.Google Scholar
Baer, Richard A. Jr. Philo’s use of the Categories Male and Female. Arbeiten zur Literatur und Geschichte des hellenistischen Judentums, III. Leiden, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, Roger S. “Church, State, and Divorce in Late Roman Egypt.” In Selig and Somerville, Florilegium Columbianum, 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, John W.Five Discourses on Desire: Sexuality and Gender in Northern France around 1200.” Speculum 66.4 (1991): 797819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, John W.An edition of the Long Version of Peter the Chanter’s Verbum Abbreviatum.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 57.1 (2006): 7885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, John W.An edition of the Long Version of Peter the Chanter’s Verbum Abbreviatum.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 57.1 (2006): 7885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, John W. The Language of Sex: Five Voices from Northern France around 1200. Chicago, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, John W. Masters, Princes, and Merchants: The Social Views of Peter the Chanter and His Circle. 2 vols. Princeton, 1970.Google Scholar
Baldwin, John W. “La vie sexuelle de Philippe Auguste.” In Rouche, Mariage et sexualité au moyen âge, 220–29.Google Scholar
Balsdon, John P. V. D. Roman Women: Their History and Habits. London, 1962.Google Scholar
Baltensweiler, Heinrich. Die Ehe in Neuen Testament. Exegetische Untersuchungen über Ehe, Ehelosigkeit und Ehescheidung. Zürich and Stuttgart, 1967.Google Scholar
Bandlien, Bjørn. Trans. der Hoek, B. van. Strategies of Passion: Love and Marriage in Medieval Iceland and Norway. Turnhout, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Patricia M. “The Anstey Case.” In Barnes and Slade, Medieval Miscellany, 1–24.Google Scholar
Barnes, Patricia M. and Slade, C. F. (eds.). A Medieval Miscellany for Doris Mary Stenton. Publications of the Pipe Roll Society, NS 36 for the year 1960. London, 1962.Google Scholar
Barnes, Timothy D. Review of J. J. O’Donnell, Augustine: Confessions. Oxford, 1992. Classical Philology 89 (1994): 293–99.Google Scholar
Barr, Jane. “The Vulgate Genesis and St Jerome’s Attitude to Women.” Studia Patristica 18 (1982): 268–73.Google Scholar
Barr, Helen and Hutchinson, Anne M.. Text and Commentary from Wyclif to Bale. Turnhout, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Robert. Trial by Fire and Water: The Medieval Judicial Ordeal. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
Basdevant-Gaudemet, Brigitte. Église et autorités: Études d’histoire de droit canonique médival. Cahiers de l’Institut d’Anthropologie Juridique 14. Limoges, 2006.Google Scholar
Basdevant-Gaudemet, Brigitte. “Le mariage d’après la correspondance d’Yves de Chartres,” Revue historique de droit français et étranger 61 (1983): 195215. [Also repr. in Basdevant-Gaudemet, Église et autorités.]Google Scholar
Bassett, William M. (ed.). The Bond of Marriage: An Ecumenical and Interdisciplinary Study. Notre Dame, 1968.Google Scholar
Bataillon, Louis-Jacques, Bériou, N., Dahan, G., and Quinto, R. (eds.). Étienne Langton: Prédicateur, bibliste, théologien. Bibliothèque d’histoire culturelle du Moyen Âge. Turnhout, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bataillon, Louis-Jacques, Dahan, Gilbert, and Gy, Pierre-Marie (eds.). Hugues de Saint-Cher (1263). Bibliste et théologien. Bibliothèque d’histoire culturelle du Moyen Âge 1. Turnhout, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batey, Richard A. New Testament Nuptial Imagery. Leiden, 1971.Google Scholar
Baümer, Remigius (ed.). Von Konstanz nach Trient. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Kirche von den Reformkonzilien bis zum Tridentinum. Festgabe für August Franzen. Munich, 1972.Google Scholar
Beatus Innocentius PP. V (Petrus de Tarantasia O.P). Studia et documenta. Rome, 1943. [Various authors.]Google Scholar
Beck, Henry G. J. Pastoral Care of Souls in South-East France during the Sixth Century. Analecta Gregoriana 51. Rome, 1950.Google Scholar
Beckwith, John. Early Medieval Art. London, 1964.Google Scholar
Bellitto, Christopher M. Renewing Christianity: A History of Church Reform from Day One to Vatican II. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Bels, Pierre. Le mariage des protestants français jusqu’en 1685. Fondements doctrinaux et pratique iuridique. Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
Beltrán de Heredia, Vicente. Domingo de Soto. Estudio biográfico documentado. Biblioteca de Teólogos Españoles, Dirigida por los Dominicos de las Provincias de España 20, B5. Salamanca, 1960. [Repr. Madrid, 1961.]Google Scholar
Beltrán de Heredia, Vicente. “Soto (Dominique de).” In Dictionnaire de théologie catholique, 14.2:2423–31.Google Scholar
Bender, Ludovicus. Forma iuridica celebrationis matrimonii. Commentarius in canones 1094–1099. Rome, 1960.Google Scholar
Berger, Adolf. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, NS 43.2. Philadelphia, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bérandy, Roger. “Le mariage des chrétiens. Étude historique.” Nouvelle revue théologique 104 (1982): 5059.Google Scholar
Bériou, Nicole. “La confession dans les écrits théologiques et pastoraux du XIIIe siècle: Médication de l’âme ou démarche judiciaire?” In L’aveu, 261–82.Google Scholar
Bériou, Nicole and d’Avray, David L. with Cole, P., Riley-Smith, J., and Tausche, M.. Modern Questions about Medieval Sermons: Essays on Marriage, Death, History and Sanctity. Spoleto, 1994.Google Scholar
Bériou, Nicole and d’Avray, David L.. “Henry of Provins, O.P.’s Comparison of the Dominican and Franciscan Orders with the ‘Order’ of Matrimony.” In Bériou and d’Avray, Modern Questions about Medieval Sermons, 71–75.Google Scholar
Bériou, Nicole and d’Avray, David L.. “The Image of the Ideal Husband in Thirteenth-Century France.” In Bériou and d’Avray, Modern Questions about Medieval Sermons, 31–69.Google Scholar
Berkhofer, Robert F.Marriage, Lordship, and the ‘Greater Unfree’ in Twelfth-Century France.” Past and Present 173 (2001): 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Harold J. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA, 1983.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. Law and Revolution II: The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA, 2003.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. and Witte, John Jr.The Transformation of Western Legal Philosophy in Lutheran Germany.” Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 15731660.Google Scholar
Bernards, Matthäus. Speculum Virginum: Geistigkeit und Seelenleben der Frau im Hochmittelalter. Forschungen zur Volkskunde, Bd. 36/38. Cologne, 1955. [2nd edition: Cologne, 1982. Beihefte zum Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, Hft. 16.]Google Scholar
Bernau, Anke, Evans, Ruth, and Salih, Sarah (eds.). Medieval Virginities. Toronto, 2003.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Jean. “Augustin et l’indissolubilité du mariage. Évolution de sa pensée.” Recherches Augustiniennes 5 (1968): 139–55.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Jean. “Le décret Tametsi du Concile de Trente: Triomphe du consensualisme matrimonial ou institution de la forme solennelle du mariage?RDC 30 (1980): 209–34.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Jean. “Évolution du sens de la forme de célébration du mariage dans l’Église d’occident.” RDC 30 (1980): 187205.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Jean. “Le mariage sacrement au Concile de Trente.” Revue de droit canonique 42 (1992): 269–85.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Jean. “Théologie et droit matrimonial.” RDC 39 (1989): 6992.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Jean, Lefebvre, Charles, and Rapp, Francis. L’Époque de la réforme et du concile de Trente. = Histoire du Droit et des Institutions de l’Église en Occident, 14. Paris, 1989.Google Scholar
Berrouard, Marie-François. “L’enseignement de saint Augustin sur le mariage dans le Tract. 9, 2 in Iohannis Evangelium.” Augustinus 1 (1967): 8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besnier, Robert. “Le mariage en Normandie des origines au XIIIe siècle.” Normannia 7 (1934): 69110.Google Scholar
Bethune, Brian Francis. The Text of the Christian Rite of Marriage in Medieval Spain. Doctoral dissertation, Toronto, 1987.Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, A. J.The History of the Indissolubility of Marriage.” Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America 22 (1967): 253308.Google Scholar
Bieniak, Magdalena. “The Sentences Commentary of Hugh of St.-Cher.” In Rosemann, Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, 2:111–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biller, Peter. The Measure of Multitude: Population in Medieval Thought. Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar
Biller, Peter. “Birth-Control in the West in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries.” Past and Present 94 (1982): 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biller, Peter and Minnis, Alastair J. (eds.). Handling Sin: Confession in the Middle Ages. York Studies in Medieval Theology 2. York, 1998.Google Scholar
Biller, Peter and Minnis, Alastair J. (eds). Medieval Theology and the Natural Body. York Studies in Medieval Theology 1. York, 1997.Google Scholar
Bishop, Jane. “Bishops as Marital Advisors in the Ninth Century.” In Kirshner and Wemple, Women of the Medieval World, 53–84.Google Scholar
Bitel, Lisa M. and Lifshitz, Felice (eds.). Gender and Christianity in Medieval Europe: New Perspectives. Philadelphia, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittremieux, Joseph. “De instanti collationis Adamo justitiae originalis et gratiae: Doctrina S. Bonaventurae.” Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses 1 (1924): 168–73.Google Scholar
Bittremieux, Joseph. “La distinction entre la justice originelle et la grâce sanctifiante d’après saint Thomas d’Aquin.” Revue Thomiste 6 (1921): 121–50.Google Scholar
Blažek, Pavel. Die mittelalterliche Rezeption der aristotelischen Philosophie der Ehe. Von Robert Grosseteste bis Bartholomäus von Brügge (1246/1247–1309). Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions 117. Leiden, 2007.Google Scholar
Blažek, Pavel. “Divorce. Greek and Latin Patristics, and Orthodox Churches.” Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception, 6:1006–08. Berlin, 2013.Google Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz P. Anselms von Laon systematische Sentenzen. BGPhMA 18.2–3. Münster, 1919.Google Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz P.Autour de l’oeuvre théologique d’Anselme de Laon.” RThAM 1 (1929): 435–83.Google Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz P.Gratian und die Schule Anselms von Laon.” Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrecht 112 (1932): 3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz P.L’oeuvre d’Anselme de Laon et la littérature théologique contemporaine.” RThAM 5 (1933): 275–91; 6 (1934): 261–83; 7 (1935): 2851.Google Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz P.Paul Fournier und das literarische Werk Ivos von Chartres.” Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrechte 115 (1935): 5391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz P.Théologie et théologiens de l’école épiscopale de Paris avant Pierre Lombard.” RThAM 3 (1931): 273–91.Google Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz P.Trente-trois pièces inédités de l’oeuvre théologique d’Anselm de Laon.” RThAM 2 (1930): 5475.Google Scholar
Bliemetzrieder, Franz P. Zu den Schriften Ivos von Chartres (d. 1116). Ein literargeschichtlicher Beitrag. Sitzungsberichte der kaiserl. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien, Philos.-hist. Klasse, 182 Bd. 6. Abh. Vienna, 1917.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Uta-Renate. “Pope Gregory VII and the Prohibition of Nicolaitism.” In Frassetto, Medieval Purity and Piety, 239–67.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Uta-Renate, Winroth, Anders, and Landau, Peter (eds.). Canon Law, Religion, and Politics: Liber Amicorum Robert Somerville. Washington, D.C., 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocarius, Antonina S.The Marriage of Unfree Persons: Twelfth-Century Decretals and Letters.” Studia Gratiana 27 (Rome, 1996): 483506.Google Scholar
Boccafola, Kenneth E. The Requirement of Perpetuity for the Impediment on Impotence. Analecta Gregoriana 200. Series Facultatis Iuris Canonici, sectio B, num. 35. Rome, 1975.Google Scholar
Bodéüs, Richard. The Political Dimensions of Aristotle’s Ethics. Trans. Garrett, Jan E.. Albany, N.Y., 1993.Google Scholar
Boissard, E.Les fins du mariage dans la théologie scolastique.” Revue thomiste 49 (1948): 289309.Google Scholar
Bonfield, Lloyd (ed.). Marriage, Property, and Succession. Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History 10. Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
Bonfield, Lloyd, Smith, Richard M., and Wrightson, Keith (eds.). The World We Have Gained: Histories of Population and Social Stucture. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
Bonnefoy, Jean-François. “La question hypothétique Utrum si homo non peccasset? au XIIIe siècle.” Revista española de teología 14 (1954): 326–68.Google Scholar
Boone, Marc. “State Power and Illicit Sexuality: The Persecution of Sodomy in Late Medieval Bruges.” Journal of Medieval History 22.2 (1996): 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgolte, Michael (ed.). Das europäische Mittelater im Spannungsbogen des Vergleichs: Zwanzig internationale Beiträge zu Praxis, Problemen und Perspektiven der historischen Komparatistik. Berlin, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Constance B. Those of My Blood: Creating Noble Families in Medieval Francia. Philadelphia, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Constance B.Consanguinity and Noble Marriages in the Tenth and Eleventh Centuries.” Speculum 56.2 (1981): 268–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, Daniel and Roberto, Rusconi (eds.). Women and Religion in Medieval and Renaissance Italy. Trans. Schneider, M. J.. Chicago, 1996.Google Scholar
Bossy, John. Christianity in the West 1400–1700. Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Bougard, François, Feller, Laurent, and Le Jan, Régine (eds.). Dots et douaires dans le haut moyen âge. Collection de l’École Française de Rome 295. Rome, 2002.Google Scholar
Bougerol, Jacques-Guy. Introduction to the Works of Bonaventure. Trans. Vinck, José de. Paterson, New Jersey, 1964.Google Scholar
Boureau, Alain. “Hugues de Saint-Cher commentateur des Sentences. Le cas du sacrement du mariage.” In Bataillon et al., Hugues de Saint-Cher, 427–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovini, Giuseppe. “Le scene della dextrarum iunctio nell’arte cristiana.” Bullettino della commissione archeologica communale di Roma 72 (1946–1948): 103–17.Google Scholar
Bowerstock, Glen W., Brown, Peter, and Grabar, Oleg (eds.). Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World. Cambridge, MA., 1999.Google Scholar
Bowlin, John. Contingency and Fortune in Aquinas’s Ethics. Cambridge Studies in Religion and Critical Thought series. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
Boxer, Marilyn J. and Quataert, Jean H. (eds.). Connecting Spheres: Women in the Western World, 1500 to the Present. Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
Boyle, Leonard E. “St Thomas Aquinas and the Third Millennium.” In Duggan et al., Omnia Disce, 294–307.Google Scholar
Božitković, Georgio. S. Bonaventura doctrina de gratia et libero arbitrio. Marienbad, 1919.Google Scholar
Brady, Ignatius. “The Distinctions of Lombard’s Book of Sentences and Alexander of Hales.” Franciscan Studies 25 (1965): 90116.Google Scholar
Brady, Ignatius. Prolegomena: See Peter Lombard, Sententiae in IV libris distinctae.Google Scholar
Brady, Ignatius. “The Rubrics of Peter Lombard’s Sentences.” Pier Lombardo 6 (1962): 525.Google Scholar
Brand, Paul A.New Light on the Anstey Case.” Essex Archaeology and History 15 (1983): 6883.Google Scholar
Brandileone, Francesco. “Die Subarrhatio cum anulo. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des mittelalterlichen Eheschliessungsrechtes.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kirchenrecht 10 (1901): 311–40.Google Scholar
Brantley, Jessica. Reading in the Wilderness: Private Devotion and Public Performance in Late Medieval England. Chicago, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunisch, Reinhard. “Johannes Gropper (1503–1559).” In Cüppers, Kölner Theologen, 172–99.Google Scholar
Braunisch, Reinhard. “Die ‘Artikell’ der ‘Warhafftigen Antwort’ (1545) des Johannes Gropper. Zur Verfasserfrage des Worms-Regensburger Buches (1540/41). In Baümer, Von Konstanz nach Trient, 519–45.Google Scholar
Brecht, Martin. Die frühe Theologie des Johannes Brenz. Tübingen, 1966.Google Scholar
Brecht, Martin. Martin Luther: His Road to Reformation 1483–1521. Trans. Schaaf, J. L.. Minneapolis, 1985.Google Scholar
Brecht, Martin. Martin Luther: Shaping and Refining the Reformation 1521–1532. Trans. Schaaf, J. L.. Minneapolis, 1990.Google Scholar
Bressan, Luigi. Il canone tridentino sul divorzio per adulterio e l’interpretazione degli autori. Analecta Gregoriana, 194. Rome, 1973.Google Scholar
Brett, Martin and Cushing, Kathleen G. (eds.). Readers, Texts and Compilers in the Earlier Middle Ages. Farnham, 2009.Google Scholar
Breuer, Christine. Reliefs und Epigramme griechischer Privatgrabmäler. Zeugnisse bürgerlichen Selbstverständnisses vom 4. bis 2. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Cologne and Vienna, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, Christopher N. L.Gregorian Reform in Action: Clerical Marriage in England, 1050–1200.” Cambridge Historical Journal 12.1 (1956): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, Christopher N. L. Marriage in Christian History: An Inaugural Lecture. Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher N. L. The Medieval Idea of Marriage. Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher N. L. “Marriage and Society in the Central Middle Ages.” In Outhwaite, Marriage and Society, 17–34.Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher N. L., Luscombe, David, Martin, Geoffrey, and Owen, Dorothy (eds.). Church and Government in the Middle Ages: Essays Presented to C. R. Cheney on his 70th Birthday. Cambridge, 1976.Google Scholar
Broudéhoux, Jean-Paul. Mariage et famille chez Clément d’Alexandrie. Paris, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey. “Medieval Theories of Relations.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/relations-medieval/.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Renunciation in Early Christianity. London, 1989.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A. Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago and London, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, James A. Sex, Law and Marriage in the Middle Ages. Variorum Reprints. Aldershot, 1993.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A.Concubinage and Marriage in Medieval Canon Law.” Journal of Medieval History 1 (1975): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, James A. “Implied Consent to Intercourse.” In Laiou, Consent and Coercion, 245–56.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A.Intermarriage between Christians and Jews in Medieval Canon Law.” Jewish History 3.1 (1988): 2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, James A.Judicial Space: Female Witnesses in Medieval Canon Law.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 52 (1998): 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, James A. “Marriage and Sexuality in the Decretals of Pope Alexander III.” In Liotta, Miscellanea Rolando Bandinelli, Papa Alessandro II, 59–83.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A. Medieval Canon Law. London, 1995.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A. The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts. Chicago, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, James A.The Medieval Battle of the Faculties: Theologians v. Canonists.” In Blumenthal, Winroth, and Landau, Canon Law, Religion, and Politics, 272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundage, James A. “Prostitution, Miscegenation and Sexual Purity in the First Crusade.” In Edbury, Crusade and Settlement, 57–65.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A.Rape and Marriage in Medieval Canon Law.” RDC 28 (1978): 6275. [Repr. in Brundage, Law and Marriage in the Middle Ages.]Google Scholar
Brundage, James A. “Sexuality and Society in the Fifth Century A.D.: Augustine and Julian of Eclanum.” In Gabba, Tria Corda, 49–70.Google Scholar
Brundage, James A. “Sin, Crime, and the Pleasures of the Flesh: The Medieval Church Judges Sexual Offenses.” In Linehan and Nelson, The Medieval World, 294–307.Google Scholar
Bryan, Lindsay. “Marriage and Morals in the Fourteenth Century: The Evidence of Bishop Hamo’s Register.” English Historical Review 121 (2006): 467–86.Google Scholar
Buitendag, Johan. “Marriage in the Theology of Martin Luther.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 63.2 (2007): 445–61.Google Scholar
Bullough, D. A.Age of Consent: A Historical Overview.” Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality 16 (2006): 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullough, D. A.Medieval Medical and Scientific Views of Women.” Viator 4 (1973): 485501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullough, D. A.Early Medieval Social Groupings: The Terminology of Kinship.” Past and Present 45 (1969): 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullough, Vern L. and Brundage, James (eds.). Handbook of Medieval Sexuality. New York, 1996.Google Scholar
Bullough, Vern L. and Brundage, James (eds.). Sexual Practices and the Medieval Church. Buffalo, 1982.Google Scholar
Burns, J. Patout. “Marital Fidelity as a Remedium Concupiscentiae: An Augustinian Proposal.” Augustinian Studies 44.1 (2013): 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, James H. (ed.). Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350–c. 1450. Cambridge, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, David. “Olivi on Marriage: The Conservative as Prophet.” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 2 (1972): 183204.Google Scholar
Burr, David. The Spriritual Franciscans: From Protest to Persecution in the Century after Saint Francis. Pennsylvania, 2001.Google Scholar
Burr, David. The Persecution of Peter Olivi. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. New Series 66.5. Philadelphia, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Sara M.‘I will never consent to be wedded with you!’ Coerced Marriage in the Courts of Medieval England.” Canadian Journal of History 39.2 (2004): 247–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadden, Joan. Meanings of Sex Differences in the Middle Ages: Medicine, Science, and Culture. Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
Cadden, Joan. “‘Nothing Natural is Shameful’: Vestiges of a Debate about Sex and Science in a Group of Late-Medieval Manuscripts.” Speculum 76.1 (2001): 6689.Google Scholar
Caffarra, Carlo. “Création et redemption.” In Problèmes doctrinaux du mariage chrétien, 218–310.Google Scholar
Lisa Sowle, Cahill and Mieth, Dietmar (eds.). The Family. = Concilium 1995/4. London, 1995.Google Scholar
Cairns, John W. and du Plessis, Paul J. (eds.). The Creation of the Ius Commune: From Casus to Regula. Edinburgh Studies in Law 7. Edinburgh, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Gerard J.St Jerome’s Attitude towards Marriage and Woman.” American Ecclesiastical Review 143 (1960): 310–20 and 384–94.Google Scholar
Campbell, Ken M. (ed.). Marriage and Family in the Biblical World. Downers Grove, Illinois, 2003.Google Scholar
Cantarella, Eva. “Homicides of Honor: The Development of Italian Adultery Law over Two Millennia.” In Kertzer and Saller, The Family in Italy, 229–44.Google Scholar
Caravale, Giorgio. Sulle tracce dell’eresia. Ambrogio Catarino Politi (1484–1553). Florence, 2007.Google Scholar
Cardman, Francine. “The Medieval Question of Women and Orders.” Thomist 42 (1978): 582–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlier, Myriam and Soens, Tim (eds.). The Household in Late Medieval Cities, Italy and Northwestern Europe Compared: Proceedings of the International Conference Ghent, 21st–22nd January 2000. Studies in Urban Social, Economic and Political History of the Medieval and Early Modern Low Countries 12. Leuven-Apeldoorn, 2001.Google Scholar
Carozzi, Claude. “Le fondements de la tripartition sociale chez adalbéron de Laon.” Annales, économies, sociétés, civilisations 33.4 (1978): 683702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrodeguas, Celestino. La sacramentalidad del matrimonio. Doctrina de Tomás Sánchez, S. J. Madrid, 2003.Google Scholar
Carroll, Christopher. “The Last Great Carolingian Church Council: The Tribur Synod of 895.” Annuarium Historiae Conciliorum 33 (2001): 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castan Lacoma, Laureano. “El origen del capitulo ‘Tametsi’ del concilio de Trento contra los matrmonios clandestinos.” Revista Española de Derecho Canónico 14 (1959): 613–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castello, Carlo. “Lo strumento dotale come prova del matrimonio.” Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 4 (1938): 208–44.Google Scholar
Catazzo, Eutimio. De iustitia et peccato originali juxta S. Bonaventuram. Theses ad lauream 18. Convento S. Lucia, Vicenza, 1942.Google Scholar
Catholic Encyclopedia. 15 vols. New York, 1907–1914.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Osvaldo and Kirschner, Julius. “Making and Breaking Betrothal Contracts (‘Sponsalia’) in Late Trecento Florence.” In Condorelli, Panta rei, 1:395–452.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Adolpho Salvatore. Medieval Tapestries in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York 1993.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Adolpho Salvatore. “Seven Scenes from the Story of the Seven Sacraments and Their Prefigurations in the Old Testament.” In Cavallo, Medieval Tapestries, 156–73 (= ch. 5).Google Scholar
Cereti, Giovanni. Divorzio, nuove nozze et penitenza nella Chiesa primitiva. Studi e recerche 26. Bologna, 1977.Google Scholar
Cereti, Giovanni. “The Reconciliation of Remarried Divorcees according to Canon 8 of the Council of Nicea.” In Provost and Walf, Ius Sequitur Vitam, 193–207.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. The Sentences of Sextus. Cambridge, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Owen. Catholicism and History: The Opening of the Vatican Archives. Cambridge, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, Georges. “Le mustérion paulinien selon les Annotations d’Erasme.” Recherches de science religieuse 58 (1970): 351–82.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Georges. “Mysterium et sacramentum dans le Dulce bellum inexpertis.” In Colloquium Erasmianum, 33–45.Google Scholar
Chapman, David M. “Marriage and Family in Second Temple Judaism.” In Campbell, Marriage and Family, 183–239.Google Scholar
Chiffoleau, Jacques. “Dire l’indicible. Remarques sur le catégorie de nefandum du XIIe au XVe siècle.” Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations 45.2 (1990): 289324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiffoleau, Jacques. “Ecclesia de occultis non judicat’? L’Église, le secret et l’occulte du XIIe au XVe siècle.” Micrologus: Nature, Sciences and Medieval Societies 14, The Secret (2006): 359–81.Google Scholar
Clanchy, Michael T. Abelard: A Medieval Life. Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar
Clanchy, Michael T. and Smith, Lesley. “Abelard’s Description of the School of Laon: What Might It Tell Us about Early Scholastic Teaching?Nottingham Medieval Studies 54 (2010): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. “Adam’s only companion: Augustine and the early Christian debate on marriage.” In Edwards and Spector, The Olde Daunce, 15–31 (with notes on 240–54).Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. Ascetic Piety and Women’s Faith: Essays on Late Antique Christianity. Studies in Women and Religion 20. Lewiston, N.Y., 1986.Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. “Heresy, Asceticism, Adam and Eve: Interpretations of Genesis 1–3 in the Later Latin Fathers.” In E. A. Clark, Ascetic Piety and Women's Faith, 353–85.Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. “Vitiated Seeds and Holy Vessels: Augustine’s Manichean Past.” In Clark, Ascetic Piety and Women’s Faith, 291–349.Google Scholar
Clark, R. Scott. “Iustitia imputata Christi: Alien or Proper to Luther’s Doctrine of Justification?Concordia Theological Quarterly 70 (2006): 269310.Google Scholar
Classen, Alrecht (ed.). Sexuality in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times: New Approaches to a Fundamental Cultural-Historical and Literary-Anthropological Theme. Fundamentals of Medieval and Early Modern Culture 3. Berlin, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemoes, Peter and Hughes, Kathleen. England before the Conquest: Studies in Primary Sources Presented to Dorothy Whitelock. Cambridge, 1971.Google Scholar
Cloke, Gillian. “This Female Man of God.” Women and Spiritual Power in the Patristic Age, AD 350–450. London and New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Cochelin, Isabelle and Smyth, Karen E. (eds.). Medieval Life Cycles: Continuity and Change. International Medieval Research 18. Turnhout, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochini, Christian. Apostolic Origins of Priestly Celibacy. Trans. Marans, Nelly. San Francisco, 1990. [Translation of Origines apostoliques du célibat sacerdotale, 1981.]Google Scholar
Cohen, David. “The Augustan Law on Adultery: The Social and Cultural Context.” In Kertzer and Saller, The Family in Italy, 109–26.Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz. Jewish and Roman Law: A Comparative Study. 2 vols. New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Cohen, Boaz. “On the Theme of Betrothal in Jewish and Roman Law.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 18 (1948–1949): 67135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey J. and Wheeler, Bonnie. Becoming Male in the Middle Ages. New York and London, 1999.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeremy. Be Fertile and Increase, Fill the Earth and Master it.” The Ancient and Medieval Career of a Biblical Text. Ithaca, 1989.Google Scholar
Cohick, Lynn H. Women in the World of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancienct Ways of Life. Grand Rapids, 2009.Google Scholar
Coleman, David. Creating Christian Granada: Society and Religious Culture in an Old-World Frontier City, 1492–1600. Ithaca, 2003.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L.Another Look at the School of Laon.” AHDLMA 53 (1986): 722.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L. “From the Sentence Collection to the Sentence Commentary and the Summa: Parisian Scholastic Theology, 1130–1215.” In Hamesse, Manuels, programmes de cours et techniques d’enseignement, 9–29.Google Scholar
Collins, Raymond F. Divorce in the New Testament. Collegeville, Minnesota, 1992.Google Scholar
Colloquium Erasmianum. Actes du Colloque International réuni à Mons du 26 au 29 oct. 1967 à l’occasion du cinquième centenaire de la naissance d’Érasme. Mons, 1968.Google Scholar
Combs, William W.Erasmus and the Textus Receptus.” Detroit Baptist Seminary Journal 1 (1996): 3553.Google Scholar
Condorelli, Orazio (ed.). “Panta rei”: Studi dedicati a Manlio Bellomo. 4 vols. Rome, 2004.Google Scholar
Conklin, George. “Ingeborg of Denmark, Queen of France, 1193–1223.” In Duggan, Queens and Queenship, 39–52Google Scholar
Connell, William T. (ed.). Society and the Individual in Renaissance Florence. Berkeley, 2002.Google Scholar
Conner, Randy. “Les Molles et les Chausses: Mapping the Isle of Hermaphrodites in Premodern France.” In Livia and Hall, Queerly Phrased, 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Patrick. “Contrasts in the Western and Eastern Approaches to Marriage.” Studia Canonica 35 (2001): 357402.Google Scholar
Constable, Giles. Three Studies in Medieval Religious and Social Thought: The Interpretation of Martha and Mary. The Ideal of the Imitation of Christ. The Orders of Society. Cambridge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Kate and Jeremy, Gregory (eds.). Discipline and Diversity: Papers Read at the 2005 Summer Meeting and the 2006 Winter Meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society. Studies in Church History 43. Rochester, N.Y., 2007.Google Scholar
Corbet, Patrick. Autour de Burchard de Worms. L’Église allemande et les interdits de parenté (IXème–XIIème siècle). Frankfurt am Main, 2001.Google Scholar
Corbet, Patrick. “Le douaire dans le droit canonique jusqu’à Gratien.” In Bougard et al., Dots et douaires, 43–55.Google Scholar
Corbett, Percy E. The Roman Law of Marriage. Oxford, 1930.Google Scholar
Coriden, James A. The Indissolubility Added to Christian Marriage by Consummation: An Historical Study of the Period from the End of the Patristic Age to the Death of Pope Innocent III. Rome, 1961.Google Scholar
Combs, William W.Erasmus and the Textus Receptus.” Detroit Baptist Journal 1 (1996): 3553.Google Scholar
Constable, Giles. Three Studies of Medieval Religious Thought. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Corecco, Eugenio, Herzog, Niklaus, and Scola, Angela (eds.). Le droits fondamentaux du chrétien dans l’Église et dans la société. Actes du IVe Congrès international de droit canonique, Fribourg (Suisse) 6-11.X.1980. Fribourg (Suisse), 1981.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Art (ed.). Marriage in Ireland. Dublin, 1985.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Art (ed.). “Consent, Consummation and Indissolubility: Some Evidence from Medieval Ecclesiastical Courts.” Downside Review 109 (1991): 94104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, Art (ed.). “Marriage in Medieval Ireland.” In Cosgrove, Marriage in Ireland, 25–50.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Art (ed.). “Marrying and Marriage Litigation in Medieval Ireland.” THTH 332–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, Patrick. “Le douaire dans le droit canonique jusqu’à Gratien.” In Bougard, Dots et Douaires, 43–55.Google Scholar
Cottiaux, Jean. La sacralisation du mariage de la Genèse aux incises matthéennes: Contribution à une théologie de développement dogmatique, à l’histoire de la discipline de moeurs, et aux problèmes posés par l’abolue indissolubilité du mariage chrétien. Paris, 1982.Google Scholar
Courtney, William J.The King and the Leaden Coin: The Economic Background of ‘Sine qua non’ causality.” Traditio 28 (1972): 185209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousin, Victor. Ouvrages inédits d’Abélard. Paris, 1836.Google Scholar
Cowdrey, H. E. J. “Pope Gregory VII and the Chastity of the Clergy.” In Frassetto, Medieval Purity and Piety, 269–302.Google Scholar
Coxe, H. O. Laudian Manuscripts. Bodleian Library Quarto Catalogues II. With corrections by Hunt, Richard W.. Oxford, 1973.Google Scholar
Crook, John. “Patria potestas.” Classical Quarterly n.s. 17.1 (1967): 113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. L’Église primitive face au divorce du premier au cinquième siècle. Paris, 1970.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. Virginité et mariage selon Origène. Paris, 1963.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “Divorce et remariage dans l’Église primitive. Quelques réflexions de méthodologie historique.” Nouvelle revue théologique 98 (1976): 891917.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “La concupiscence charnelle dans le mariage selon saint Augustin.” Bulletin de littérature ecclesiastique 1987: 287–308.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “Le remariage après séparation pour adultère selon les Pères latins.” Bulletin de Littérature Ecclesiastique 75 (1974): 189204.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “Les Pères de l’Église ont-ils permis le remariage après séparation?Bulletin de Littérature Ecclésiastique 70 (1969): 343.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “Remarriage after Divorce in the Primitive Church: À propos of a Recent Book.” Irish Theological Quarterly 38 (1971): 2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouzel, Henri. “Séparation ou remariage selon les pères anciens.” Gregorianum 47 (1966): 472–94.Google Scholar
Cullum, Patricia H., and Lewis, Katherine J. (eds.). Holiness and Masculinity in the Middle Ages. Religion and Culture in the Middle Ages series. Cardiff, 2004.Google Scholar
Cullum, Patricia H., and Lewis, Katherine J. (eds.). Religious Men and Masculine Identity in the Middle Ages. Gender in the Middle Ages 9. Rochester, N.Y., 2013.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Terence P. “The Bond of Marriage.” In McDonagh, The Meaning of Christian Marriage, 92–113.Google Scholar
Cüppers, Hubert (ed.). Kölner Theologen. Von Rupert von Deutz bis Wilhelm Nyssen. Cologne, 2004.Google Scholar
Cushing, Kathleen G. Reform and the Papacy in the Eleventh Century: Spirituality and Social Change. Manchester, 2005.Google Scholar
D’Avray, David L. Medieval Marriage Sermons: Mass Communication in a Culture without Print. Oxford, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Avray, David L. Medieval Marriage: Symbolism and Society. Oxford, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Avray, David L. “Comparative History of the Medieval Church’s Marriage System.” In Borgolte, Das europäische Mittelater im Spannungsbogen des Vergleichs, 209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Avray, David L. “The Gospel of the Marriage Feast of Cana and Marriage Preaching in France.” In Bériou and d’Avray, Modern Questions, 135–53.Google Scholar
D’Avray, David L. “Marriage Ceremonies and the Church in Italy after 1215.” In Dean and Lowe, Marriage in Italy, 107–15.Google Scholar
D’Avray, David L. “Peter Damian, Consanguinity and Church Property.” In Smith and Ward, Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages, 71–81.Google Scholar
D’Avray, David L. “Some Franciscan Ideas about the Body.” In Bériou and d’Avray, Modern questions, 3–29.Google Scholar
D’Avray, David L. “Symbolism in Medieval Religious Thought.” In Linehan and Nelson, The Medieval World, 267–78.Google Scholar
D’Avray, David L. and Tausche, M.. “Marriage Sermons in Ad status Collections of the Central Middle Ages.” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire de moyen âge 40 (1980): 71119. [Repr. In Bériou and d’Avray, Modern Questions, 77–134.]Google Scholar
D’Elia, Anthony F. The Renaissance of Marriage in Fifteenth-Century Italy. Cambridge, MA., 2004.Google Scholar
D’Entrèves, Alessandro P. The Medieval Contribution to Political Thought: Thomas Aquinas, Marsilius of Padua, Richard Hooker. New York, 1959.Google Scholar
Dachowski, Elizabeth. “Tertius est optimus: Marriage, Continence and Virginity in the Politics of Late Tenth- and Early Eleventh-Century Francia.” In Frassetto, Medieval Purity and Piety, 117–29.Google Scholar
Daube, David. Collected Works of David Daube. Ed. Carmichael, Calum M.. Vol. 1: Talmudic Law. University of California at Berkeley, 1992.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “Historical Aspects of Informal Marriage.” In Collected Works of David Daube, 1:153–63.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “Origen and the Punishment of Adultery in Jewish Law.” In Collected Works of David Daube, 1:167–71.Google Scholar
Daudet, Pierre. L’établissement de la compétence le l’église en matière de divorce et de consanguinité (France Xème–XIIème siècles). Études sur l’histoire de la jurisdiction matrimoniale. Paris, 1941.Google Scholar
Daudet, Pierre. Les origines carolingiennes de la compétence exclusive de l'église. Études sur l’histoire de la jurisdiction matrimoniale. Paris, 1933.Google Scholar
Dauvillier, Jean. Le mariage dans le droit classique de l’église depuis le Décret de Gratien (1140) jusqu’á mort de Clément V (1314). Paris, 1933.Google Scholar
Davidson, Nicholas. “Theology, Nature and the Law: Sexual Sin and Sexual Crime in Italy from the Fourteenth to the Seventeenth Century.” In Dean and Lowe, Crime, Society and the Law in Renaissance Italy, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Glenys. “The Significance of the Handshake Motif in Classical Funerary Art.” American Journal of Archaeology 89 (1985): 627–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Gregory W. The Body in Question: Metaphor and Meaning in the Interpretation of Ephesians 5:21–33. Leiden, 1998.Google Scholar
Trevor, Dean and Lowe, Kate J. P. (eds.). Crime, Society and the Law in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Trevor, Dean and Lowe, Kate J. P.. (eds). Marriage in Italy, 1300–1650. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Decker, Raymond. “Institutional Authority versus Personal Responsibility in the Marriage Sections of Gratian’s A Concordance of Discordant Canons.” The Jurist 32 (1972): 5165.Google Scholar
Delhaye, Philippe. “The Development of the Medieval Church’s Teaching on Marriage.” Concilium 55 (1970): 8388. “Fixation dogmatique de la théologie médiévale du mariage (sacramentum, vinculum, ratum et consummatum).” Concilium 55 (1970): 77–81.Google Scholar
Delhaye, Philippe. “Le dossier anti-matrimonial de l’Adversus Jovinianum et son influence sur quelques écrits latins su XIIe siècle.” Mediaeval Studies 13 (1951): 6586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dépinay, J. Le régime dotal. Étude historique, critique et pratique. Droit français, étranger et international privé. Paris, 1902.Google Scholar
Depreux, Philippe. “La dotation de l’épouse en Aquitaine septentrionale du IXe au XIIe siècle.” In Bougard et al., Dots et douaires, 219–44.Google Scholar
Desjardins, R.Le Christ sponsus et l’Église sponsa chez saint Augustin.” Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique 67 (1966): 241–56.Google Scholar
Devisse, Jean. Hincmar, archevêque de Reims, 845–882. 3 vols. Geneva, 19751976.Google Scholar
Dhanis, Édouard. “Quelques anciennes formules septénaires des sacrements.” Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique 26 (1930): 574608, 916–50; 27 (1931): 5–26.Google Scholar
di Ciano, Marco. Le arrhae sponsaliciae in diritto romano e comparato. Tesi di Dottorato, Università degli studi di Ferrara, 2009.Google Scholar
di Mattia, Giuseppe. “Il decreto Tametsi e le sue radici nel Concilio di Bologna.” Apollinaris 53 (1980): 476500.Google Scholar
Dib, P. “Affinité.” DDC 1:264–285.Google Scholar
Dictionary of the Middle Ages. Ed. Strayer, Joseph. 13 vols + supplement. New York, 1982–1989. Supplement, ed. Jordan, William C., New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Dictionnaire de droit canonique. Ed. Naz, R.. 7 vols. Paris, 1907–1953. [DDC]Google Scholar
Dictionnaire de théologie catholique. Ed. Alfred, Vacant et al. 15 vols. in 30. Paris, 1903–1972.Google Scholar
Die Handschriftliche Überlieferung der Werke des heiligen Augustinus. Vienna, 1969–.Google Scholar
Diefendorf, Barbara B. Paris City Councillors in the Sixteenth Century: The Politics of Patrimony. Princeton, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTommaso, Lorenzo and Turescu, L. (eds.). The Reception and Interpretation of the Bible in Late Antiquity: Proceedings of the Montréal Colloquium in Honour of Charles Kannengiesser, 11–13 October 2006. Leiden, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr.Bassianus, That Is to Say, Bazianus? Bazianus and Johannes Bassianus on Marriage.” Revista internazionale di diritto comune 14 (2005): 4182.Google Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr.The Canon Law on the Formation of Marriage and Social Practice in the Later Middle Ages.” Journal of Family History 8 (1983): 144–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr.The Case of the Man who Fell into the Tiber: The Roman Law of Marriage at the Time of the Glossators.” American Journal of Legal History 22 (1978): 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr.The Dating of Alexander the Third’s Marriage Decretals: Dauvillier Revisited after Fifty Years.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte 99 (Kanonistische Abteilung 68) (1982): 70124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr. “English and French Marriage Cases: Might the Differences Be Explained by Differences in the Property Systems?” In Bonfield, Marriage, Property, and Succession, 339–66.Google Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr. Faventinus, Johannes on Marriage (With an Appendix Revisiting the Question of the Dating of Alexander III’s Marriage Decretals.” In Müller and Sommar, Medieval Church Law and the Origins of the Western Legal Tradition, 179–97.Google Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr. Law, Marriage, and Society in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge, 2007.Google Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr. “The Policy of Alexander the Third’s Consent Theory of Marriage.” Monumenta Iuris Canonici, series C: Subsidia, vol. 5 (Vatican City, 1976), = Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Canon Law, ed. Stephan Kuttner, 251–81.Google Scholar
Donahue, Charles Jr.Was there a Change in Marriage Law in the Late Middle Ages?Rivista internazionale de diritto comune 6 (1995): 4980.Google Scholar
Doran, John. “Innocent III and the Uses of Spiritual Marriage.” In Andrews et al., Pope, Church and City, 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, Mary. “Sex, Allegory and Censorship: A Reconsideration of Medieval Commentaries on the Song of Songs.” Literature and Theology 10.4 (1996): 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Eric. “The Question of Women Priests and the Argument in persona Christi.” Irish Theological Quarterly 50 (1983–1984): 212221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Thomas P. (ed.). Marriage Studies: Reflections in Canon Law and Theology. Vol. III. Washington, D.C., 1985.Google Scholar
Drachman, Bernard. “Betrothal.” Jewish Encyclopedia, vol. 3 (1903), 125–28.Google Scholar
Drew, Katherine F. Law and Society in Early Medieval Europe. Variorum Reprints. London: 1988.Google Scholar
Driver, Godfrey R. and Miles, John C.. The Babylonian Laws, vol. 1: Legal Commentary. Oxford, 1952.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. Le chevalier, la femme et le prêtre. Le mariage dans la France féodale. Paris, 1981.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. The Knight, the Lady and the Priest: The Making of Modern Marriage in Medieval France. Trans. Bray, Barbara. Chicago, 1983.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. Medieval Marriage: Two Models from Twelfth-Century France. Trans. Forster, Elborg. Baltimore, 1978.Google Scholar
Dufour, Jean. “Louis VI, Roi de France (1108–1137), à la lumière des actes royaux des sources narratives.” Académie des inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. Comptes rendus des séances, April–June 1990, 134.2 (Paris, 1990): 456–82.Google Scholar
Duggan, Anne (ed.). “The Nature of Alexander III’s Contribution to Marriage Law, with Special Reference to Licet preter solitum.” In Andersen, Salonen, Sigh, and Vogt, Law and Marriage in Medieval and Early Modern Times, 43–63.Google Scholar
Duggan, Anne (ed.). Queens and Queenship in Medieval Europe. Woodbridge, 1997.Google Scholar
Duggan, Anne, Greatrex, Joan, and Bolton, Brenda (eds.). Omnia disce: Medieval Studies in Memory of Leonard Boyle, O.P. Aldershot, 2005.Google Scholar
Duggan, Charles. “Equity and Compassion in Papal Marriage Decretals to England.” In van Hoecke and Welkenhuysen, Love and Marriage in the Twelfth Century, 59–87.Google Scholar
Dulles, Avery. “Symbol, Myth, and the Biblical Revelation.” Theological Studies 27.1 (1966): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbabin, Jean. A Hound of God: Pierre de la Palud and the Fourteenth-Century Church. Oxford, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupont, Anthony, François, Wim, Geest, Paul van, and Lamberigts, Mathijs. “Sex.” In Oxford Guide to the Historical Reception of Augustine 3:1726–37.Google Scholar
Duval, André. “Contrat et sacrement de mariage au concile de Trente.” La Maison-Dieu 127 (1976): 3463.Google Scholar
Duval, André. “La formule Ego vos in matrimonium conjungo . . . au concile de Trente.” La Maison-Dieu 99 (1969): 144–53.Google Scholar
Duval, André. “Le concile de Trente et la distinction entre le contrat et le sacrement de marriage.” Revues des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 65 (1981): 286–94.Google Scholar
Dzon, Mary. The Image of the Wanton Christ Child in the Apocryphal Infancy Legends of Late Medieval England. Doctoral dissertation, Toronto, 2004.Google Scholar
Dzon, Mary. “Wanton Boys in Middle English Texts and the Christ Child in Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, MS Z822 N81.” In Cochelin and Smyth, Medieval Lifecycles, 81–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edbury, Peter W. (ed.). Crusade and Settlement. Cardiff, 1985.Google Scholar
Edwards, Robert R. and Spector, S. (eds.). The Olde Daunce: Love, Friendship and Marriage in the Medieval World. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Eells, H.The Origin of the Regensburg Book.” Princeton Theological Review 26 (1928): 355–72.Google Scholar
Ehrle, Franz. “Zur Vorgeschichte des Concils von Vienne.” In Ehrle and Denifle, Archiv für Literatur- und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters, vol. 2 (Berlin, 1886), 353416, and vol. 3 (Berlin, 1887), 1–195.Google Scholar
Ehrle, Franz and Denifle, Heinrich (eds.). Archiv für Literatur- und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters. 7 vols. Freiburg im Breisgau, etc., 1885–1900.Google Scholar
Eisenach, Emlyn. Husbands, Wives, and Concubines: Marriage, Family, and Social Order in Sixteenth-Century Verona. Sixteenth Century Essays and Studies 69. Kirksville, Missouri, 2004.Google Scholar
Elliott, Dyan. Fallen Bodies: Pollution, Sexuality, and Demonology in the Middle Ages. Philadelphia, 1999.Google Scholar
Elliott, Dyan. “The Physiology of Rapture and Female Spirituality.” In Biller and Minnis, Medieval Theology and the Natural Body, 141–74.Google Scholar
Elliott, Dyan. “The Priest’s Wife: Female Erasure in the Gregorian Reform.” In Elliott, Fallen Bodies, 81–106.Google Scholar
Elliott, Dyan. Spiritual Marriage: Sexual Abstinence in Medieval Wedlock. Princeton, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Dyan. “Sex in Holy Places: An Exploration of a Medieval Anxiety.” Journal of Women’s History 6.3 (1994): 634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encyclopedia of Christianity. Ed. Fahlbusch, Erwin et al. 5 vols. Grand Rapids and Leiden, 2008.Google Scholar
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception. Berlin, 2013.Google Scholar
Engh, Line C. Gendered Identities in Bernard of Clairvaux’s “Sermons on the Song of Songs”: Performing the Bride. Brepols, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennen, Edith. Frauen im Mittelalter. 2nd edition. Munich, 1985.Google Scholar
Ennen, Edith. The Medieval Woman. Trans. Jephcott, E.. Oxford, 1989. [Translation of Ennen, , Frauen im Mittelalter.]Google Scholar
Emmen, Aquilino. “Verginità e matrimonio nella valutazione dell’Olivi.” Studi Francescani 64 (1967): 1157.Google Scholar
Esmein, Adhémar. Le mariage en droit canonique. 2nd edition, ed. Génestal, R. and Dauvillier, J.. 2 vols. Paris, 1929, 1935. [First edition published Paris, 1891.] [Abbr. Esmein-Genestal]Google Scholar
Etienne, J.Ruard Tapper (1487–1559).” Louvain Studies 5 (1975): 284–86.Google Scholar
Études d’histoire du droit canonique dédiées à Gabriel Le Bras. 2 vols. Paris, 1965.Google Scholar
Evans, Gillian R. (ed.). A History of Pastoral Care. London, 2000.Google Scholar
Grubbs, Evans, Judith. Law and Family in Late Antiquity: The Emperor Constantine’s Marriage Legislation. Oxford, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubbs, Evans, Judith. Women and the Law in the Roman Empire: A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Widowhood. Abingdon, U.K., 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubbs, Evans, Judith. “Abduction Marriage in Antiquity: A Law of Constantine (CTh ix. 24. 1) and Its Social Context.” Journal of Roman Studies 79 (1989): 5983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubbs, Evans, Judith. “Marriage Contracts in the Roman Empire.” In Lovén and Stömberg, Ancient Marriage, 78–101.Google Scholar
Grubbs, Evans, Judith. “‘Marriage More Shameful than Adultery’. Slave-Mistress Relationships, ‘Mixed Marriages’, and Late Roman Law.” Phoenix 47.2 (1993): 125–54.Google Scholar
Grubbs, Evans, Judith. “Marrying and Its Documentation in Later Roman law.” THTH 43–94.Google Scholar
Grubbs, Evans, Judith. “‘Pagan’ and ‘Christian’ Marriage: The State of the Question.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 2.4 (1994): 361412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evdokimov, Paul. Sacrament de l’amour. Le mystère coniugale à la lumière de la tradition orthodoxe. Paris, 1962.Google Scholar
Fanning, John Edward. Sacramentality in the Marriage Doctrine of Hincmar of Rheims: A Doctrinal-Juridical Analysis of the Letter De nuptiis Stephani. Doctoral dissertation, Gregorian University, Rome, 1992.Google Scholar
Farmer, Sharon. Surviving Poverty in Medieval Paris. Ithaca, N.Y., 2002.Google Scholar
Farmer, Sharon. “Persuasive Voices: Clerical Images of Medieval Wives.” Speculum 61 (1986): 517–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnedi, Giustino (ed.). La celebrazione cristiana del matrimonio: simboli e testi: atti del II Congresso internazionale di liturgia, Roma, 27-31 maggio 1985, = Studia Anselmiana 93, = Analecta liturgica 11. Rome, 1986.Google Scholar
Fayer, Carla. La familia romana: aspetti giuridici ed antiquari. Parte seconda: Sponsalia, matrimonio, dote. Problemi e Ricerche di Storia Antica 21. Rome, 2005.Google Scholar
Laurent, Feller. “Morgengabe, dot, tertia: rapport introductif.” In Bougard et al., Dots et douaire, 1–25,Google Scholar
Fellhauer, David E.Consortium omnis vitae as a juridical element of marriage.” Studia Canonica 13 (1979): 3171.Google Scholar
Féret, H.-M.Sacramentum, res, dans la langue théologique de s. Augustin.” Revue des Sciences philosophiques et théologiques 29 (1940): 218–43.Google Scholar
Filser, Hubert. Ekklesiologie und Sakramentenlehre des Kardinals Johannes Gropper. Eine Glaubenslehre zwischen Irenik und Kontroverstheologie im Zeitalter der Reformation. Studien zur systematischen Theologie und Ethik, Bd. 6. Münster, 1995.Google Scholar
Finch, A. J.Parental Authority and the Problem of Clandestine Marriage in the Later Middle Ages.” Law and History Review 8.2 (1990): 189204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. “The Truth in Legal Positivism.” In George, Autonomy of Law, 195214. [Repr. in Finnis, J., Philosophy of Law: Collected Essays, vol. 4 (Oxford, 2011), 174–88.]Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Allan D. (ed.). Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia. Grand Rapids, 1999.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Donal. “The Sacrament of Marriage.” In McDonagh, The Meaning of Christian Marriage, 36–61.Google Scholar
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. Families in Former Times: Kinship, Household and Sexuality. Trans. Southern, R.. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. Un temps pour embrasser: aux origines de la morale sexuelle occidentale (VIe–XIe siècle). Paris, 1983.Google Scholar
Flint, Valerie I. J.The ‘School of Laon’: A Reconsideration.” RThAM 43 (1976): 89110.Google Scholar
Folliet, Georges. “Les trois catégories de chrétiens. A partir de Luc (17, 34–36), Matthieu (24, 40–41) et Ézéchiel (14, 14).” In Augustinus Magister, communications, vol. 2 (Paris, 1954–1955), 631–44.Google Scholar
Folliet, Georges. “Les trois catégories de chrétiens. Survie d’un thème augustinien.” L’année théologique augustinienne 14 (1954): 8296.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Jacques, et al. Grégoire le Grand: Chantilly, Centre Culturel Les Fontaines, 15–19 septembre 1982. Paris, 1986.Google Scholar
Forster, Marc. The Counter-Reformation in the Villages: Religion and Reform in the Bishopric of Speyer, 1560–1720. Ithaca, 1992.Google Scholar
Fournier, Paul. Les officialités au Moyen Âge. Étude sur l’organisation, la compétence et la procédure des tribunaux ecclésiastiques ordinaires en France, de 1180 à 1328. Paris, 1880.Google Scholar
Frank, Roberta. “Marriage in Twelfth- and Thirteenth-Century Iceland.” Viator 4 (1973): 473–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenberry, Nancy K. (ed.). Radical Interpretation in Religion. Cambridge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenberry, Nancy K. “Religion as a ‘Mobile Army of Metaphors’.” In Frankenberry, Radical Interpretation in Religion, 171–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransen, Gérard. Review of H. J. F. Reinhardt, Die Ehelehre der Schule des Anselms von Laon. Revue théologique de Louvain 9 (1978): 202–04.Google Scholar
Fransen, Gérard. “La formation du lien matrimoniale au moyen âge.” RDC 21 (1971): 106–26. [Also published in Metz and Schlick, Le lien matrimonial, 106–26.]Google Scholar
Fransen, Gérard. “Le lettre de Hincmar de Reims au sujet deu mariage d’Étienne: Une relecture.” In Lievens, Van Mingroot, and Verbeke, Pascua Mediaevalia, 133–46.Google Scholar
Fransen, Gérard. “Varia ex manuscriptis.” Traditio 21 (1965): 515–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frakes, Robert M. Contra Potentium Iniurias: The Defensor Civitatis and Late Roman Justice. Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsgeschichte 90. Munich, 2001.Google Scholar
Frassetto, Michael (ed.). Medieval Purity and Piety: Essays on Medieval Clerical Celibacy and Religious Reform. New York and London, 1998.Google Scholar
Freedman, Paul. Images of the Medieval Peasant. Stanford, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freisen, Joseph. Geschichte des kanonischen Eherechts bis sum Verfall der Glossenliteratur. Paderborn, 1893. [Repr. Aalen, 1963.]Google Scholar
Friedman, Mordechai A. Jewish Marriage in Palestine: A Cairo Genizah Study. 2 vols. Tel-Aviv and New York, 1980–1981.Google Scholar
Frier, Bruce W.Natural Fertility and Family Limitation in Roman Marriage.” Classical Philology 89.4 (1994): 318–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frier, Bruce W. and McGinn, Thomas A. J.. A Casebook on Roman Family Law. Oxford, 2004.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Horst. “Ökumenische Konzil und seine historische Grundlagen.” Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 12 (1961): 672–95.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Horst. “The Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries.” In Jasper and Fuhrmann, Papal Letters in the Early Middle Ages, 137–95.Google Scholar
Furry, Timothy J. Allegorizing History: The Venerable Bede, Figural Exegesis, and Historical Theology. Eugene, OR, 2013.Google Scholar
Fussenegger, Geroldus. “Littera septem sigillorum contra doctrinam Petri Ionnis Olivi edita.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 47 (1954): 4553.Google Scholar
Gabba, Emilio (ed.). Tria Corda: Scritti in onore di Arnaldo Momigliano. Como, 1983.Google Scholar
Gagnér, Sten. Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Iuridica Upsaliensia 1. Stockholm, 1960.Google Scholar
Ganshof, François-Louis. “L’‘épreuve de la croix’ dans le droit de la monarchie franque.” In Studi in onore di Alberto Pincherle, 217–31.Google Scholar
Ganshof, François-Louis. “Le statut de la femme dans la monarchie franque.” Société Jean Bodin, Receuils 12 (1962): 558.Google Scholar
Ganshof, François-Louis. “Note sur deux textes de droit canonique dans le Liber Floridus.” In Études d’histoire du droit canonique, 1:99–115.Google Scholar
Gardner, Jane F. Women in Roman Law and Society. London, 1976.Google Scholar
Garnsey, Paul. Ideas of Slavery from Aristotle to Augustine. W. B. Stanford Memorial Lectures. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Garrison, Marsha. “Marriage: The Status of Contract. An Essay on Weitzman’s The Marriage Contract.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 131.4 (1983): 1039–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastaldelli, Ferruccio. “La Summa Sententiarum di Ottone da Lucca: Conclusione di un dibattito secolare.” Salesianum 42 (1980): 537–46.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. Le bréviaire d’Alaric et les Epitome. Ius Romanum Medii Aevi 1, 2 b aa b. Milan, 1965.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. Droit de l’Église et vie sociale au Moyen Âge. Variorum Reprints. Northampton, 1989.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. L’Église dans l’Empire romain (IVe–Ve siècles). = Histoire du droit et des insitutions de l'Église en occident 3. Paris, 1958.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. Église et cité: Histoire du droit canonique. Paris, 1994.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. Le mariage en occident. Le moeurs et le droit. Paris, 1987.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. Sociétés et mariage. Strasbourg: CERDIC, 1980. [Collected articles.]Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “Indissolubilité et consommation du mariage. L’apport d’Hincmar de Reims.” RDC 30 (1980): 2840.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “L’apport d’Augustin à la doctrine medièvale du mariage.” Augustinianum 27 (1987): 559570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “L’évolution de la notion de sacramentum en matière de mariage.” RDC 41 (1991): 7179.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “Le lien matrimonial: les incertitudes du haut moyen-âge.” RDC 21 (1971): 81105.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “Le mariage, un contrat?Revue des sciences morales et politiques 150.2 (1995): 161–73.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “Les origines historiques de la faculté de rompre le mariage non consommé.” In Gaudemet, Sociétés et mariage (Strasbourg, 1980), 210–29.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “Les sources du Décret de Gratien.” RDC 48.2 (1998): 247–61.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “Marriage et procréation: Les aspects historiques.” RDC 45 (1995): 245–56.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “Recherche sur les origines historiques de la faculté de rompre le mariage non consommé.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law, ed. Kuttner, S. and Pennington, K., = Monumenta Iuris Canonici, series C, subsidia, vol. 6 (Vatican City, 1980), 309–32.Google Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. Review of Joseph Huber, Der Ehekonsens im Römischen Recht (q.v.). Revue d’histoire de droit, = Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 47 (1979): 171–73.Google Scholar
Gellinek, C.Marriage by Consent in Literary Sources of Medieval Germany.” Studia Gratiana 12 (1967): 557–79.Google Scholar
Gelting, Michael H. “Marriage, Peace and the Canonical Incest Prohibitions: Making Sense of an Absurdity?” In Korpiola, Nordic Perspectives on Medieval Canon Law, 93–124.Google Scholar
Gennep, Arnold van. Les rites de passage. Paris, 1909.Google Scholar
Gennep, Arnold van. The Rites of Passage. Trans. Vizedon, M. B. and Caffee, G. L.. Chicago, 1960. [Translation of Les rites de passage.]Google Scholar
George, Robert P. (ed.). The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford, 1996.Google Scholar
Gereste, Régis-Claude. “Quand les chrétiens ne se mariaient pas à l’Église. Histoire des cinq premiers siècles.” Lumière et Vie 82 (1967): 2427.Google Scholar
Geyer, Bernhard. Die Sententiae divinitatis: Ein Sentenzenbuch der Gilbertschen Schule. BGPhM 7.2–3. Münster, 1909.Google Scholar
Ghellinck, Joseph de. “Un chapitre dans l’histoire de la définition des sacrements au XIIe siècle.” In Mélanges Mandonnet, 2:79–96.Google Scholar
Ghellinck, Joseph de. “Magister Vacarius. Un juriste théologien peu amiable pour les canonistes.” Revue d’histoire ecclesiastique 44 (1949): 173–78.Google Scholar
Ghellinck, Joseph de. “The Sentences of Anselm of Laon and their Place in the Codification of Theology during the XIIth Century.” Irish Theological Quarterly 6 (1911): 427441.Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret T. and Nelson, Janel L. (eds.). Charles the Bald: Court and Kingdom. Oxford, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gies, Frances and Gies, Joseph. Marriage and the Family in the Middle Ages. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Ginther, James R. and Still, Carl N. (eds.). Essays in Mediaeval Philosophy and Theology in Memory of Walter Principe, CSB: Fortresses and Launching Pads. Aldershot, 2005.Google Scholar
Girard, René. “Marriage in Avignon in the Second Half of the Fifteenth Century.” Speculum 28.3 (1953): 485–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Cédric. Per verba magistri. Anselme de Laon et son école au XIIe siècle. Turnhout, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Cédric. “Le recueil de sentences de l’école de Laon Principium et causa: Un cas de pluri-attribution.” In M. Goullet, Parva pro magnis munera, 245–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Cédric and Mews, Constant J.. “Le Liber pancrisis, un florilège des Pères et des maîtres modernes du XIIe siècle.” Bulletin du Cange 64 (2006): 145–91.Google Scholar
Gladd, Benjamin. Revealing the Mysterion: The Use of Mystery in Daniel and Second Temple Judaism with Its Bearing on First Corinthians. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 160. Berlin and New York, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon. Répertoire des maîtres en théologie de Paris au XIIIe siècle. 2 vols. Études de philosophie médiévale 1718. Paris, 1933, 1934.Google Scholar
Goetz, Hans-Werner. Leben im Mittelalter vom 7. bis zum 13. Jahrhundert. Munich, 1986.Google Scholar
Gold, Penny S. “The marriage of Mary and Joseph in the twelfth-Century Ideology of Marriage.” In Bullough and Brundage, Sexual Practices and the Medieval Church, 102–117.Google Scholar
Goldberg, P. J. P.Gender and Matrimonial Litigation in the Church Courts in the Later Middle Ages: The Evidence of the Court of York.” Gender and History 19.1 (2007): 4359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Oriental, the Ancient and the Primitive: Systems of Marrriage and the Family in the Pre-Industrial Societies of Eurasia. Cambridge, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goullet, Monique (ed.). Parva pro magnis munera. Études de littérature tardo-antique et médiévale offertes à François Dolbeau par ses élèves. Turnhout, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordley, James. “Ardor quaerens intellectum: Sex within Marriage According to the Canon Lawyers and Theologians of the 12th and 13th centuries.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Kanonistiche Abteilung 114 (1997): 305–32.Google Scholar
Gouron, André. “Sur les sources civilistes et la datation des Sommes de Rufin et d’Etienne de Tournai.” BMCL 16 (1986): 5570.Google Scholar
Grabka, Gregory. “Cardinal Hosius and the Council of Trent.” Theological Studies 7 (1946): 558–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Michael and Kitzinger, Rachel (eds.). Civilization of the Ancient Mediterranean: Greece and Rome. 3 vols. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Gray, Douglas. “London, British Library, Additional MS 37049 – A Spiritual Encyclopedia.” In Barr and Hutchinson, Text and Commentary from Wyclif to Bale, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Robert A.Instinct of Nature: Natural Law, Synderesis, and the Moral Sense.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58.2 (1997): 173–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greengus, Samuel. “The Old Babylonian Marriage Contract.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 89 (1969): 505–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greengus, Samuel. “Redefining ‘Inchoate Marriage’ in Old Babylonian Contexts.” In Abusch, Riches Hidden in Secret Places, 123–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Donald J. The Pauline Privilege: An Historical Synopsis and Commentary. Washington, D.C., 1931.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Beatrice. “The Meaning of Clandestine Marriage.” In Wheaton and Hareven, Family and Sexuality, 49–83.Google Scholar
Grant, Michael and Kitzinger, R. (eds.). Civilization of the Ancient Mediterranean: Greece and Rome. 3 vols. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Guareschi, Massimiliano. “Fra canones e leges: Magister Vacarius e il matrimonio.” Mélanges de l’École française de Rome: Moyen-Âge – Temps modernes 111.1 (1999): 105–39.Google Scholar
Gudeman, Stephen. “The Compadrazgo as a Reflection of the Natural and Spiritual Person.” Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1971: 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudeman, Stephen. “Spiritual Relationships and Selecting a Godparent.” Man, n.s. 10 (1975): 221–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guibert, Joseph de. “Le texte de Guillaume de Paris sur l’essence du sacrement de mariage.” Recherches de science religieuse 4 (1914): 422–27.Google Scholar
Gunten, F. von. “La doctrine de Cajétan sur l’indissolubilité de mariage.” Angelicum 43 (1966): 6272.Google Scholar
Gy, Pierre-Marie. “Le nouveau rituel romain du mariage.” La Maison-Dieu 98 (1969): 124–43.Google Scholar
Hacke, Daniela. Women, Sex, and Marriage in Early Modern Venice. Aldershot, 2004.Google Scholar
Hagen, Kenneth. “Was Luther a ‘Monk’?Lutheran Quarterly 24.2: 183–85.Google Scholar
Hall, Edwin. The Arnolfini Betrothal: Medieval Marriage and the Enigma of Van Eyck’s Double Portrait. Berkeley, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, John A. The Sacraments in the Compilatio questionum theologie of Magister Martinus: Critical Edition with Commentary. Doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, 2010.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet. “Behind the Law of Marriage (I): From Status/Contract to Marriage System.” Unbound 6.1 (2010): 158.Google Scholar
Hamesse, Jacqueline. Les Auctoritates Aristotelis. Un florilège médiéval. Étude historique et édition critique. Philosophes Médiévaux 17. Louvain and Paris, 1974.Google Scholar
Hamesse, Jacqueline (ed.). Les prologues médiévaux. Actes du colloque international. Turnhout, 2000.Google Scholar
Hamesse, Jacqueline (ed.). Manuels, programmes de cours et techniques d’enseignement dans les universites medievales. Louvain-la-Neuve, 1994.Google Scholar
Hamesse, Jacqueline. “Johannes de Fonte, compilateur des Parvi Flores, le témoignage de plusieurs manuscrits de la bibliothèque vaticane.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 88 (1995): 515–31.Google Scholar
Hanawalt, Barbara A. The Ties That Bound. Peasant Families in Medieval England. Oxford and New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Hanawalt, Barbara A. and Wallace, David (eds.). Bodies and Disciplines: Intersections of Literature and History in Fifteenth-Century England. Minneapolis, 1996.Google Scholar
Hanley, Philip L.Ex opere operantis.” New Catholic Encyclopedia.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sarah. “Engendering the State: Family Formation and State Building in Early Modern France.” French Historical Studies 16.1 (1989): 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Sarah. “Family and State in Early Modern France: The Marriage Pact.” In Boxer and Quataert, Connecting Spheres, 53–63.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sarah. “‘The Jurisprudence of the Arrêts’: Marital Union, Civil Society, and State Formation in France, 1550–1650.” Law and History Review 21.1 (2003): 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Lars Ivar (ed.). Family, Marriage and Property Devolution in the Middle Ages. Tromsø, 2000.Google Scholar
Haring, Nicholas M.The Interaction Between Canon Law and Sacramental Theology in the Twelfth Century.” Monumenta Iuris Canonici, series C: Subsidia, vol. 5, = Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law (Città del Vaticano, 1976), 483–93.Google Scholar
Haring, Nicholas M.St. Augustine’s Use of the Word ‘Character’.” Mediaeval Studies 14 (1952): 7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haring, Nicholas M.The Sententiae Magistri A (Vat. Ms. lat. 4361) and the School of Laon.” Mediaeval Studies 17 (1955): 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, Mary and Laurence, Ray. “Betrothal, Mid-Late Childhood and the Life Course.” In Lovén and Strömberg, Ancient Marriage, 56–77.Google Scholar
Harrington, Joel F. Reordering Marriage and Society in Reformation Germany. Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
Harrington, Joel F.Hausvater and Landesvater: Paternalism and Marriage Reform in Sixteenth-Century Germany.” Central European History 25.1 (1992): 5275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Carol. “Measure, Number, and Weight in Saint Augustine’s Aesthetics.” Augustinianum 28 (1998): 591602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Wilfried and Schmitz, Gerhard (eds.). Fortschritt durch Fälschungen? Ursprung, Gestalt und Wirkungen der pseudoisidorischen Fälschungen. Hannover, 2001.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Wilfried and Pennington, Kenneth (eds.). The History of Medieval Canon Law in the Classical Period, 1140–1234: From Gratian to the Decretals of Pope Gregory IX. Washington, D.C., 2008.Google Scholar
Haskell, Ann S.The Paston Women on Marriage in Fifteenth-Century England.” Viator 4 (1973): 459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, Thomas. “The Marriages of Christina of Markyate.” Viator 21 (1990): 75101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaney, Seamus P. The Development of the Sacramentality of Marriage from Anselm of Laon to Thomas Aquinas. Dissertation, Catholic University of America. Washington, D.C, 1963.Google Scholar
Heckel, Johannes. Lex Charitatis: A Juristic Disquisition on Law in the Theology of Martin Luther. Trans. and ed. by Krodel, G. G. et al. Grand Rapids, 2010.Google Scholar
Heidecker, Karl. Trans. Guest, Tanis M.. The Divorce of Lothar II: Christian Marriage and Political Power in the Carolingian World. Ithaca, 2010.Google Scholar
Heimann, Adelheid. “Die Hochzeit von Adam und Eva im Paradies nebst einigen andern Hochzeitsbildern.” Wallraf-Richartz Jahrbuch 37 (1975): 1140.Google Scholar
Heinzmann, Richard. Die Unsterblichkeit der Seele und die Auferstehung des Leibes. Münster, 1965.Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H. Marriage Litigation in Medieval England. Cambridge, 1974.Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H. The Spirit of the Classical Canon Law. Athens, GA: Univ. of Georgia Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hen, Yitzhak. Culture and Religion in Merovingian Gaul, AD 481–751. Leiden, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, Scott. “Luther on Marriage.” Lutheran Quarterly 14 (2000): 335–50. [Repr. in Wengert, Harvesting Martin Luther’s Reflections, 169–84.]Google Scholar
Henninger, Mark G. Relations: Medieval Theories 1250–1325. Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Henquinet, F. M.Les écrits de Frère Guerric de Saint-Quentin. RThAM 6 (1934): 184214, 284–312, 394–410.Google Scholar
Herlihy, David. “The Family and Religious Ideologies in Medieval Europe.” Journal of Family History 12 (1987): 317. [Repr. in Herlihy, Women, Family, and Society, 154–73.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herlihy, David. “Making Sense of Incest: Woman and the Marriage Rules of the Early Middle Ages.” In Bachrach and Nicholas, Law, Custom, and the Social Fabric in Medieval Europe, 96–109. [Repr. in Herlihy, Women, Family, and Society, 1–16.]Google Scholar
Herlihy, David. “The Medieval Marriage Market,” in Randall, D. B. J., Medieval and Renaissance Studies no. 6, 3–21. [Repr. in Herlihy, Social History of Italy and Western Europe.] Medieval Households. Cambridge, MA, 1985.Google Scholar
Herlihy, David. The Social History of Italy and Western Europe, 700–1500: Collected Studies. Variorum Reprints. London, 1978.Google Scholar
Herlihy, David. Women, Family and Society in Medieval Europe: Historical Essays, 1978–1991. Providence, 1995.Google Scholar
Herlihy, David and Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. Tuscans and their Families: A Study of the Florentine Catasto of 1427. New Haven, 1985. [Translation of Les Toscans et leurs familles. Une étude du Catasto florentin de 1427. Paris, 1978.]Google Scholar
Herreros González, Carmen and Santapau Pastor, Maria Carmen. Pedro Guerrero: Vida y obra de un ilustre riojano del siglo XVI. Ciencias históricas (Instituto de Estudios Riojanos) 23. Logroño, 2012.Google Scholar
Hersch, Karen K. The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity. Cambridge, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, René. “Aspects temporels dans la formation du lien matrimonial chez Gratien.” RDC 48.2 (1998): 349–61.Google Scholar
Hilaire, Jean. Le régime des biens entre époux dans la région de Montpellier du début du XIIIe siècle à la fin du XVIe siècle. Montpellier, 1957.Google Scholar
Hill, Rosalind. “Marriage in Seventh-Century England.” In King and Stevens, Saints, Scholars, and Heroes, vol. 1: The Anglo-Saxon Heritage, 67–73.Google Scholar
Histoire des conciles oecuméniques, t. 10: See La Brosse et al.Google Scholar
Histoire des conciles oecuméniques, t. 11: See Lecler et al.Google Scholar
Histoire du christianisme des origines à nos jours, tome V: Apogée de la papauté et expansion de la Chrétienté (1054–1274). Ed. Vauchez, André et al. Paris, 1993.Google Scholar
Hocedez, Edgar. Richard de Middleton: Sa vie, ses oeuvres, sa doctrine. Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, Études et Documents 7. Louvain, 1925.Google Scholar
Hocutt, Max. “Aristotle’s Four Becauses.” Philosophy 49 (1974): 385–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoecke, Willy van and Welkenhuysen, Andries (eds.). Love and Marriage in the Twelfth Century. Mediaevalia Lovaniensia, series I, studia VIII. Leuven, 1981.Google Scholar
Hogg, James. An Illustrated Yorkshire Carthusian Religious Miscellany British Library London Additional MS. 37049. Vol. 3: The Illustrations. Analecta Cartusiana 95. Salzburg, 1981.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. C.The Image of God in Man: Is Woman Included (Gen. 1:27)?Harvard Theological Review 72 (1979): 175206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Joseph. Der Ehekonsens im römischen Recht. = Analecta Gregoriana 204. Rome, 1977.Google Scholar
Hughes, Diane Owen. “From Brideprice to Dowry in Mediterranean Europe.” Journal of Family History 3 (1978): 262–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G.Augustine and the Making of Marriage in Roman North Africa.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 11.1 (2003): 6385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G.Augustine, Sermon 354A: Its Place in His Thought on Marriage and Sexuality,” Augustinian Studies 32 (2002): 3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G.Augustinian Pessimism? A New Look at Augustine’s Teaching on Sex, Marriage, and Celibacy.” Augustinian Studies 25 (1994): 153–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G. “Bono viduitatis, De.” In Fitzgerald, Augustine through the Ages, 111–12.Google Scholar
Hunter, David G. “The Date and Purpose of Augustine’s De continentia.” Augustinian Studies 26.2 (1995): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G.Helvidius, Jovinian, and the Virginity of Mary in Late Fourth-Century Rome.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 1 (1993): 4771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G.Between Jovinian and Jerome: Augustine and the Interpretation of 1 Corinthians 7.” Studia Patristica 43 (2006): 131–36.Google Scholar
Hunter, David G. Marriage in the Early Church. Minneapolis, 1992.Google Scholar
Hunter, David G. Marriage, Celibacy, and Heresy in Ancient Christianity: The Jovinianist Controversy. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G. “Marrying and the Tabulae Nuptiales in Roman North Africa.” In Reynolds and Witte, To Have and to Hold, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G. “The Reception and Interpretation of Paul in Late Antiquity: 1 Corinthians 7 and the Ascetic Debates.” in DiTommaso and Turescu, The Reception and Interpretation of the Bible in Late Antiquity, 281–303.Google Scholar
Hunter, David G.Rereading the Jovinianist Controversy: Asceticism and Clerical Authority in Late Ancient Christianity.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 33.3 (2003): 453–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G.Resistance to the Virginal Ideal in Late-Fourth-Century Rome: The Case of Jovinian.” Theological Studies 48 (1987): 4564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, David G.On the Sin of Adam and Eve: A Little-Known Defense of Marriage and Childbearing by Ambrosiaster.” Harvard Theological Review 82 (1989): 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iung, H. “Cognatio spiritualis.” DDC 3, 952–70.Google Scholar
d’Izarny, Raymond. “Mariage et consécration virginale au VIe siècle.” La vie spirituelle, supp. 6 (1953): 92118.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle and Thomasset, Claude. “Albert le Grand et les problèmes de sexualité.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 3 (1981): 7393.Google Scholar
Jacquart, Danielle and Thomasset, Claude. Sexuality and Medicine in the Middle Ages. Trans. Adamson, M.. Cambridge, 1988. [Translation of Sexualité et savoir médical au moyen Âge, Paris, 1985.]Google Scholar
Jaski, Bart. “Marriage Laws in Ireland and on the Continent in the Early Middle Ages.” In Meeks and Simms, The Fragility of Her Sex, 14–42.Google Scholar
Jasper, Detlev and Fuhrmann, Horst. Papal Letters in the Early Middle Ages. History of Medieval Canon Law series. Washington, D.C., 2001.Google Scholar
Jedin, Hubert. History of the Council of Trent. Trans. Graf, E.. 2 vols. London, 1957–1961. [Uncompleted translation of Geschichte des Konzils von Trient.]Google Scholar
Jedin, Hubert. Geschichte des Konzils von Trient. 4 vols. in 5. Freiburg, 1949–1975.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Alan K. and Preston, Patrick. Biblical Scholarship and the Church: A Sixteenth-Century Crisis of Authority. Aldershot, 2007.Google Scholar
Jeschke, Thomas, Retucci, F., Guldentops, G., and Speer, A.. “Durandus von St. Pourçain und sein Sentenzenkommentar. Eine kritische Edition der A- und B-Redaktion.” Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 51 (2009): 113–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewish Encyclopedia. Singer, Isidore, general editor. 12 vols. New York, 1901–1906.Google Scholar
Jochens, Jenny M.The Church and Sexuality in Medieval Iceland.” Journal of Medieval History 6 (1980): 377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochens, Jenny M. “‘Með Jákvæði Hennar Sjálfar’: Consent as a Signifier in the Old Norse World.” In Laiou, Consent and Coercion, 271–289.Google Scholar
Johnson, Brandy Schnautz. “The Making of Marriage in Thirteenth Century England: Verb Tense, Popular Legalism, and the Alexandrine Law of Marriage.” Texas Journal of Women and the Law 15 (2005–2006): 271303.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, Herbert F. and Nicholas, B., Historical Introduction to Roman Law. Cambridge, 1972.Google Scholar
Joyce, George H. Christian Marriage: An Historical and Doctrinal Study. 2nd edition. London, 1948. [First edition published London and New York, 1933.]Google Scholar
Kaiser, Wolfgang. Die Epitome Iuliani: Beiträge zum römischen Recht im frühen Mittelalter und zum byzantinischen Rechtsunterricht. Frankfurt, 2004.Google Scholar
Kalb, Herbert. Studien zur Summa Stephans von Tournai. Ein Beitrag zur kanonistischen Wissenschaftsgeschichte des späten 12. Jahrhunderts. Innsbruck, 1983.Google Scholar
Kalifa, Simon. “Singularités matrimoniales chez les anciens Germains. Le rapt et le droit de la femme à disposer d’elle-même.” Revue historique de droit français et étranger, 4th series, 48 (1970): 199225.Google Scholar
Kamas, Juraj. The Separation of the Spouses with the Bond Remaining: Historical and Canonical Study with Pastoral Applications. Tesi Gregoriana, Serie Diritto Canonico 20. Rome, 1997.Google Scholar
Kamen, Henry. The Phoenix and the Flame: Catalonia and the Counter Reformation. New Haven, 1993.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Marion A. (ed.). The Marriage Bargain: Women and Dowries in European History. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. From Boys to Men: Formations of Masculinity in Late Medieval Europe. Philadelphia, 2003.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. Common Women: Prostitution and Sexuality in Medieval England. New York, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. “The History of Marriage and the Myth of Friedelehe.” Early Medieval Europe 14.2 (2006): 119–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. “Prostitution in Medieval Europe,” in Bullough and Brundage, Handbook of Medieval Sexuality, 243–60.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. “The Regulation of Sexuality in the Late Middle Ages,” Speculum 86 (2011): 10101039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karras, Ruth Mazo. “Thomas Aquinas’s Chastity Belt: Clerical Masculinity in Medieval Europe.” In Bitel and Lifshitz, Gender and Christianity in Medieval Europe, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. “Sexuality in the Middle Ages.” In Linehan and Nelson, The Medieval World, 279–93.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. “Sharing Wine, Women, and Song: Masculine Identity Formation in Medieval European Universities.” In Cohen and Wheeler, Becoming Male in the Middle Ages, 187–202.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. Sexuality in Medieval Europe: Doing unto Others. New York, 2005.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. “Two Models, Two Standards: Moral Teaching and Sexual Mores.” In Hanawalt and Wallace, Bodies and Disciplines, 123–38.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. Unmarriages: Women, Men, and Sexual Unions in the Middle Ages. Philadelphia, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karras, Ruth Mazo. “Gendered Sin and Misogyny in John of Bromyard’s Summa predicantium.” Traditio 47 (1992): 233–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, John N. D. Jerome. London, 1975.Google Scholar
Kelly, David F. “Sexuality and Concupiscence in Augustine.” Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics 1983: 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, William. Pope Gregory II on Divorce and Remarriage: A Canonical-Historical Investigation of the Letter “Desiderabilem mihi” with Special Reference to the Response Quod proposuisti. Analecta Gregoriana 203, Ser. Fac. Iuris Can. sectio B, 37. Rome, 1976.Google Scholar
Kéry, Lotte. Canonical Collections of the Early Middle Ages (ca. 400–1140): A Bibliographical Guide to the Manuscripts and Literature. Washington, D.C., 1999.Google Scholar
Kéry, Lotte. “Non enim homines de occultis, sed de manifestis iudicant. La culpabilité dans le droit pénal de l’Église à lépoque classique.” RDC 53.2 (2003): 311–36.Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I. and Saller, Richard P. (eds.). The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven, 1991.Google Scholar
Kilmartin, E. J. “Ex opere operato.” New Catholic Encyclopedia.Google Scholar
King, Margaret L.Caldiera and the Barbaros on Marriage and the Family: Humanist Reflections of Venetian Realities.” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 6 (1976): 1950. [Repr. in King, Humanism, Venice, and Women.]Google Scholar
King, Margaret L. Humanism, Venice, and Women: Essays on the Italian Renaissance. Variorum Collected Studies. Aldershot, 2005.Google Scholar
King, Margaret L.Personal, Domestic, and Republican Values in the Moral Philosophy of Giovanni Caldiera.” Renaissance Quarterly 28.4 (1975): 535–74. [Repr. in King, Humanism, Venice, and Women.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Margot H. and Stevens, Wesley M. (eds.). Saints, Scholars and Heroes: Studies in Medieval Culture in Honor of Charles W. Jones. 2 vols. Collegeville, 1979.Google Scholar
King, P. D. “The Barbarian Kingdoms.” In Burns, Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, 123–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, P. D. Law and Society in the Visigothic Kingdom. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, Third Series, vol. 5. Cambridge, 1972.Google Scholar
Kirshner, Julius F. and Wemple, S. F. (eds.). Women of the Medieval World: Essays in Honor of John H. Mundy. Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane (ed.). A History of Women: Silence of the Middle Ages. Cambridge, MA., 1992.Google Scholar
Klosko, George (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy. Oxford, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knibbs, Eric. “The Interpolated Hispana and the Origins of Pseudo-Isidore.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung 99.1 (2013): 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Oxford, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochuthara, Shaki G. The Concept of Sexual Pleasure in the Catholic Moral Tradition. Rome, 2007.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert. “Two-Kingdoms Doctrine.” In Encyclopedia of Christianity, 8:569–75.Google Scholar
Kondratuk, Laurent. “Un témoignage á l’heure de Tametsi: Les Institutiones iuris canonici de Lancelotti (1563).” RDC 53.1 (2003): 2740.Google Scholar
Korpiola, Mia. “An Act or a Process? Competing Views on Marriage Formation and Legitimacy Medieval Europe,” in Hansen, Family, Marriage and Property Devolution, 3154.Google Scholar
Korpiola, Mia. Between Betrothal and Bedding: Marriage Formation in Sweden 1200–1600. Leiden, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpiola, Mia. (ed.). Nordic Perspectives on Medieval Canon Law. Publications of the Matthias Calonius Society 2. Helsinki, 1999.Google Scholar
Korpiola, Mia. (ed.). Regional Variations in Matrimonial Law and Custom in Europe, 1150–1600. Leiden, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpiola, Mia. “Rethinking Incest and Heinous Sexual Crime: Changing Boundaries of Secular and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in Late Medieval Sweden.” In Musson, Boundaries of the Law, 102–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpiola, Mia. “The Two Husbands of Helleka Horn: Interpreting the Canon Law of Marriage in Late Medieval Sweden.” In Condorelli, Panta rei, 3:153–81.Google Scholar
Kors, Jean-Baptiste. La justice primitive et le péché originel d’après s. Thomas. Les sources, la doctrine. Paris, 1922.Google Scholar
Köstler, Rudolf. “Ringwechsel und Trauung.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Kanonistiche Abteilung 22 (1933): 133.Google Scholar
Köstler, Rudolf. “Raub-, Kauf- und Friedelehe bei den Germanen.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, germanistische Abteilung 63 (1943): 92136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmer, Shawn M.The Virile Bride of Bernard of Clairvaux.” Church History 69.2 (2000): 304–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraye, Jill and Saarinen, Risto (eds.). Moral Philosophy on the Threshold of Modernity. The New Synthese Historical Library 57. Dordrecht, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Berthold. “Noah, Daniel and Job – The Three Righteous Men of Ezekiel 14.14 in Medieval Art.” Journal of the Warburg and Courthauld Institutes 67 (2004): 259–67.Google Scholar
Kuefler, Mathew. The Manly Eunuch: Masculinity, Gender Ambituity, and Christian Ideology in Late Antiquity. Chicago, 2001.Google Scholar
Kuefler, Mathew. “The Marriage Revolution in Late Antiquity: The Theodosian Code and Later Roman Marriage Law.” Journal of Family History 32.4 (2007): 343–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiters, R.Saint Augustin et l’indissolubilité du mariage.” Augustiniana 9 (1959): 511.Google Scholar
Kümper, Hiram. “Did Medieval Canon Marriage Law Invent our Modern Notion of Rape? Revisiting the Idea of Consent before and after 1200.” In Andersen, Salonen, Sigh, and Vogt, Law and Marriage in Medieval and Early Modern Times, 111–25.Google Scholar
Kuttner, Stephan. “Ecclesia de occultis non iudicat.” In Acta Congressus Iuridici Internationalis, Romae 1934 (Rome 1935), 3:225–46.Google Scholar
Kuttner, Stephan. History of Ideas and Doctrines of Canon Law in the Middle Ages. Variorum Reprints. Collected Studies series 113. London, 1980. [2nd edition. 1992.]Google Scholar
Kuttner, Stephan. (ed.) Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Medieval Canon Law, Strasbourg, 3–6 September 1968. Monumenta Iuris Canonici, Series C, Subsidia 4. Vatican City, 1971.Google Scholar
Kuttner, Stephan. “Sur les origines du term ‘droit positif’.” Revue historique de droit français et étranger, 4e série, 15 (1936): 728–40. [Repr. in Kuttner, History of Ideas and Doctrines.]Google Scholar
La Bonnardière, Anne-Marie. “La date du De continentia de saint Augustin.” Revue des études augustiniennes 5 (1959): 121–27.Google Scholar
La Brosse, Olivier de, Lecler, Jospeph, Holstein, Henri, and Lefebvre, Charles. Latran V et Trente, 1512–1517 et 1545–1548. Histoire des conciles oecuméniques 10. Paris, 1975.Google Scholar
Laberge, Damasus. “Fr. Petri Ioannis Olivi O.F.M., tria scripta sui ipsius apologetica annorum 1283 et 1285.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 28 (1935): 115–55, 374–407 and 29 (1936): 98–141, 365–95.Google Scholar
Laeuchli, Samuel. Power and Sexuality: The Emergence of Canon Law at the Synod of Elvira. Philadelphia, 1972.Google Scholar
Lagarde, André. The Latin Church in the Middle Ages. Trans. Alexander, Archibald. New York, 1915.Google Scholar
Lähteenmäki, Olavi. Sexus und Ehe bei Luther. Schriften der Luther-Agricola-Gesellschaft 10. Turku, 1955.Google Scholar
Laiou, Angeliki E. (ed.). Consent and Coercion to Sex and Marriage in Ancient and Medieval Societies. Washington, D.C., 1993.Google Scholar
Laiou, Angeliki E.Consensus Facit Nuptiaset Non: Pope Nicholas I’s Responsa to the Bulgarians as a Source for Byzantine Marriage Customs.” Rechtshistorisches Journal 4 (1985): 189201.Google Scholar
Laiou, Angeliki E. “Sex, Consent, and Coercion in Byzantium.” In Laiou, Consent and Coercion, 109–221.Google Scholar
Landau, Peter. “Gratian und die Sententiae Magistri A.” In Mordek, Aus Archiven und Bibliotheken, 311–26.Google Scholar
Landau, Peter. “Hadrians IV. Decretale Dignum est (X 4.9.1) und die Eheschließung Unfreier in der Diskussion von Kanonisten und Theologen des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts.” Studia Gratiana 12 (1967) (= Collectanea S. Kuttner, vol. 2): 511–53.Google Scholar
Landau, Peter. “The Origins of Legal Science in England in the Twelfth Century: Lincoln, Oxford and the Career of Vacarius.” Brett and Cushing, Readers, Texts and Compilers, 165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Peter and Petzolt, Martin (eds.). De iure canonico Medii Aevi: Festchrift für Rudolf Weigand. = Studia Gratiana 27. Rome, 1996.Google Scholar
Landgraf, Artur M. Introduction à l’histoire de la littérature théologique de la scolastique naissante. Trans. Geiger, Louis-B.. Ed. Landry, Albert-M.. Publications de l’Institut d’Études Médiévales, Université de Montréal, 22. Montréal and Paris, 1973.Google Scholar
Larrainzar, Carlos. “La distinction entre fides pactionis y fides consensus en el Corpus Iuris Canonici.” Ius canonicum 21 (1981): 31100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Atria A.Early Stages of Gratian’s Decretum and the Second Lateran Council: A Reconsideration.” Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law 27 (2007): 2156.Google Scholar
Larsson Lovén, Lena and Strömberg, Agneta (eds.). Ancient Marriage in Myth and Reality. Newcastle upon Tyne, 2010.Google Scholar
Larsson Lovén, Lena. “Coniugal Concordia: Marriage and Marital Ideals on Roman Funerary Monuments.” In Larsson Lovén and Strömberg, Ancient Marriage in Myth and Reality, 204–20.Google Scholar
Laurent, Marie-Hyacinthe. Le bienheureux Innocent V (Pierre de Tarentaise) et son temps. Vatican City, 1947.Google Scholar
Le Bras, Gabriel. “Le mariage dans le théologie et le droit de l’Eglise du XIe au XIIIe siècle.” Cahiers de civilization médiévale 11 (1968): 191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bras, Gabriel. “Mariage. La doctrine du mariage chez les théologiens et les canonistes depuis l’an mille.” DDC 9.2:21232317.Google Scholar
Le Jan, Régine. “Aux origines de douaire médiévale (VIe–Xe siècle).” In Le Jan, Femmes, pouvoir et société, 53–67.Google Scholar
Le Jan, Régine. Femmes, pouvoir et société dans le haut Moyen Âge. Médiévistes français 1. Paris, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, Josef. Die Sacramentenlehre des Richard von Mediavilla. Müncher Studien zur historischen Theologie 5. Munich, 1925.Google Scholar
Lecler, Joseph, Holstein, Henri, Adnès, Pierre, and Lefebvre, Charles. Le concile de Trente 1551–1563. Histoire des conciles oecuméniques 11. Paris, 1981.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. Le mariage vu par les moines au XIIe siècle. Paris, 1983.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. “L’amour et le mariage vus par des clercs et des religieux, spécialement au XIIe siècle.” In van Hoecke and Welkenhuysen, Love and Marriage in the Twelfth Century, 102–115.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. Monks and Love in Twelfth Century France. Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. Monks on Marriage: A Twelfth Century View. New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Leclercq, Jean. Recueil d’études sur saint Bernard et ses écrits. 5 vols. Rome, 1962–1992.Google Scholar
Leeming, Bernard. Principles of Sacramental Theology. 2nd edition. London and Westminster, MD, 1960.Google Scholar
Lefebvre-Teillard, Anne. Les officialialités à la veille du Concile de Trente. Paris, 1973.Google Scholar
Lefebvre-Teillard, Anne. “A propos d’une lettre à Guillaume: La filiation légitime dans l’oeuvre d’Ives de Chartres.” Studia Gratiana 27 (Rome, 1996): 287309.Google Scholar
Lefebvre-Teillard, Anne. “Régle et réalité dans le droit matrimonial a la fin du moyen-âge.” RDC 30 (1980): 4253.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, Georges. Anselmi Laudunensis et Radulfi fratris eius Sententias excerptas. Mediolanum Aulercorum [Évreux], 1895.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, Georges. De Anselmo Laudunensi Scholastico (1050–1117). Dissertation, Faculté des lettres de Paris. Mediolanum Aulercorum [Évreux], 1895.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, Georges. Les variations de Guillaume de Champeaux. = Travaux et mémoires de l’Univeresité de Lille, tome 6, mémoire 20. Lille, 1898.Google Scholar
Legg, John Wickham. Ecclesiological Essays. The Library of Liturgiology and Ecclesiology for English Readers, vol. 7, ed. Staley, Vernon. London, 1905.Google Scholar
Legg, John Wickham. “Notes on the Marriage Service in the Book of Common Prayer of 1549.” In Legg, Ecclesiological Essays, 181–218.Google Scholar
Lievens, R., Mingroot, Erik van, and Verbeke, Werner (eds.). Pascua Mediaevalia. Studies voor Prof. Dr. J. M. de Smet. Mediaevalia Lovaniensia 1.10. Louvain, 1983.Google Scholar
Lemaire, André. “La dotatio de l’épouse de l’époque mérovingienne au XIIIe siècle.” Revue historique de droit français et étranger, 4th series, 8 (1929): 569–80.Google Scholar
Lemaire, André. “Origine de la règle Nullum sine dote fiat coniugium.” In Mélanges Paul Fournier, 415–24.Google Scholar
Lenherr, T.Der Begriff ‘executio’ in der Summa Decretorum des Huguccio.” Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrecht 150 (1981): 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lettmann, Reinhard. Die Diskussion über die klandestinen Ehen und die Einführung einer zur Gültigkeit verpflichtenden Eheschließungsform auf dem Konzil von Trient. Münsterische Beiträge zur Theologie, Heft 31. Münster, 1966.Google Scholar
Levin, Eve. Sex and Society in the World of the Orthodox Slavs, 900–1700. Ithaca, 1989.Google Scholar
Le lien matrimoniale. Colloque du CERDIC. Ed. R. Metz and J. Schlick. Strasbourg, 1970.Google Scholar
Lievens, Robrecht, Mingroot, Erik Van, and Verbeke, Werner (eds.). Pascua Mediaevalia: Studies voor Prof. Dr. J.M. de Smet. Leuven, 1983.Google Scholar
Linder, Klaus M.Courtship and the Courts: Marriage and Law in Southern Germany, 1350–1550.” ThD dissertation, Harvard University, 1988.Google Scholar
Linehan, Peter and Nelson, Janet L. (eds.). The Medieval World. London, 2001.Google Scholar
Liotta, Filippo. La continenza dei chierici nel pensiero canonistico classico, da Gratziano a Gregorio IX. Milan, 1979.Google Scholar
Liotta, Filippo (ed.). Miscellanea Rolando Bandinelli, Papa Alessandro III. Siena, 1986.Google Scholar
Lipgens, Walter. Kardinal Johannes Gropper, 1503–1559, und die Anfänge der katholischen Reform in Deutschland. Münster, Westf., 1951.Google Scholar
Lipton, Emma. Affections of the Mind: The Politics of Sacramental Marriage in Late Medieval English Literature. Notre Dame, Indiana, 2007.Google Scholar
Livia, Anna and Hall, Kira (eds.). Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality. Oxford, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loader, William. Sexuality in the Jesus Tradition. Grand Rapids, 2005.Google Scholar
Loader, William. The New Testament on Sexuality. Grand Rapids, 2012.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Daniela. “Intervention by Church and State in Marriage Disputes in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth- Century Florence.” In Dean and Lowe, Crime, Society and the Law in Renaissance Italy, 142–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, Daniela. Matrimoni de antico regime. Annali dell’Istituto storico italo-germanico in Trento, Monografie 34. Bologna, 2001.Google Scholar
Longeaux, Jacques de. Amour, marriage et séxualité d’après la Bible. Cahiers de l’École cathédrale 22. Paris, 1996.Google Scholar
Looper-Friedman, Susan E.The Decline of Manus-Marriage in Rome.” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 55 (1987): 281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López Martín, Juan. Don Pedro Guerrero: epistolario y documentación. Publicaciones del Instituto Español de Historia Eclesiástica: Subsidia, no. 13. Rome, 1974.Google Scholar
López Martín, Juan. “El voto de Don Pedro Guerrero sobre el sacramento del matrimonio en el Concilio de Trento.” Archivo Teológico Granadino 44 (1981): 147219.Google Scholar
López Martín, Juan. La imagen del obispo en el pensamiento teológico-pastoral de don Pedro Guerrero en Trento. Publicaciones del Instituto Español de Historia Eclesiástica: Monografías num. 16. Rome, 1971.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. Psychologie et morale au XIIe et XIIIe siècles, Tome V: Problèmes d’histoire littéraire. L’école d’Anselme de Laon et de Guillaume de Chapeaux. Gembloux (Belgique), 1959. [Cited as Lottin, PsM V]Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “A propos de la date de deux florilèges concernant Anselme de Laon.” RThAM 26 (1959): 307–14.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Les Sententiae Atrebatenses.” RThAM 10 (1938): 205224, 344–57.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Nouveaux fragments théologiques de l’école d’Anselme de Laon.” RThAM 11 (1939): 242–59 [NF 1–15], 305–23 [NF 16–21]; 12 (1940): 49–77 [NF 52–120]; 13 (1946): 202–21 [NF 259–329], 261–81 [NF 330–97]; 14 (1947): 5–31 [NF 398–491], 157–85 [NF 492–580].Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Pour une édition critique du Liber Pancrisis.” RThAM 13 (1946): 185201 [NF 121–258].Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Un nouveau témoin du Liber Pancrisis.” RThAM 23 (1956): 114–18.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “Une tradition spéciale du texte des Sententiae divinae paginae.” In Studia Mediaevalia in honorem admodum Reverendi Patris Raymundi Josephi Martin, 147–69.Google Scholar
Lössl, Josef. “De nuptiis et concupiscentia.” In Oxford Guide to the Historical Reception of Augustine 1:353–58.Google Scholar
Luscombe, David E. The School of Peter Abelard. Cambridge, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Joseph H. Godparents and Kinship in Early Medieval Europe. Princeton, 1986.Google Scholar
Lynch, Kilian F.The Theory of Alexander of Hales on the Efficacy of the Sacrament of Matrimony.” Franciscan Studies 11 (1951): 69139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Kilian F.Texts Illustrating the Causality of the Sacraments from William of Melitona, Assisi Bibl. Comm. 182, and Brussels Bibl. Royale 1542.” Franciscan Studies 17 (1957): 238–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Kilian F.A Terminus ante quem for the Commentary of Alexander of Hales.” Franciscan Studies 10 (1950): 4668.Google Scholar
Maas, Pauline H. J. T. The Liber sententiarum Magistri A: Its Place admidst the Sentences Collections of the First Half of the 12th Century. Middeleeuwse Studies 11. Nijmegen, 1995.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, Alan. Marriage and Love in England: Modes of Reproduction 1300–1840. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
Mackin, Theodore. Divorce and Remarriage. Marriage in the Catholic Church series. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Mackin, Theodore. “Ephesians 5:21–33 and Radical Indissolubility.” In Doyle, Marriage Studies III 1–45.Google Scholar
Mackin, Theodore. The Marital Sacrament. Marriage in the Catholic Church series. New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Mackin, Theodore. “The Primitive Christian Understanding of Marriage.” In Scott and Warren, Perspectives on Marriage, 24–29.Google Scholar
Mackin, Theodore. What is Marriage? Marriage in the Catholic Church series. New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Macy, Gary. The Hidden History of Women’s Ordination: Female Clergy in the Medieval West. Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Marthaler, Berard L. Original Justice and Sanctifying Grace in the Writings of Saint Bonaventure. Miscellanea francescana. Rome, 1965.Google Scholar
Meyvaert, Paul. “Bede’s Text of the Libellus Responsionum of Gregory the Great to Augustine of Canterbury.” In Clemoes and Hughes, England before the Conquest, 15–33.Google Scholar
Meyvaert, Paul. “Le Libellus Responsionum à Augustin de Cantorbéry: Une oeuvre authentique de saint Grégoire le Grand.” In Fontaine et al., Grégoire le Grand, 543–50.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese. “Per la storia del processo contro l’Olivi.” Rivista di storia della chiesa in Italia 5 (1951): 326–39.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic W.Magistri Vacarii Summa de matrimonio. Introduction.” Law Quarterly Review 13 (1887): 133–43. “Vacarius on Marriage (Text),” ibid., 270–87.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic W.. “Vacarius on Marriage (Text).Law Quarterly Review 13 (1887): 270–87.Google Scholar
Makowski, Elizabeth M.The Coniugal Debt in Medieval Canon Law.” Journal of Medieval History 3 (1977): 99114 and 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerbe, Louis. Le mariage au début du XIIIème siècle d’après la Summa du cardinal Robert de Courson.Thèse de doctorat, Faculté de droit canonique, Institut catholique de Paris, 1924.Google Scholar
Manenti, C. Dell’inapponibilità di condizioni al negozi giuridici e in specie delle condizioni apposte al matrimonio. Siena, 1889.Google Scholar
Manetti, Giovanni. Theories of the Sign in Classical Antiquity. Advances in Semiotics series. Trans. Richardson, Christine. Bloomington, 1993. [Translation of Manetti, Le teorie del segno nell’antichità classica, Milan, 1987.]Google Scholar
Manselli, Raoul. “Il monaco Enrico e la sua Eresia.” Bulletino dell Instituto Storico Italiano 65 (1953): 163.Google Scholar
Manzanares, Julio. “El ‘munus regendi’ según Pedro Guerrero y Juan de Fonseca.” In Corecco, Les droits fondamentaux, 773–86.Google Scholar
Marchetto, Giuliano. Il divorzio imperfetto. I giuristi medievali e la separazione dei coniugi. Annali dell’Instituto storico italo-germanico in Trento, Monografie 48. Bologna, 2008.Google Scholar
Marius, Richard. Martin Luther: The Christian between God and Death. Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google Scholar
Marius, Richard. “Henry VIII, Thomas More, and the Bishop of Rome.” In Albion 10 (1978), = Quincentennial Essays on St. Thomas More: Selected Papers from the Thomas More College Conference, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marius, Richard. Thomas More: A Biography. Cambridge, MA, 1984.Google Scholar
Martin, Francis. “Marriage in the New Testament Period.” In Olsen, Christian Marriage, 50–100.Google Scholar
Martin, Francis. “Marriage in the Old Testament and Intertestamental Periods.” In Glenn W. Olsen, Christian Marriage, 1–49.Google Scholar
Martin, Jochen. “Zur Anthropologie von Heiratsregeln und Besitzübertragung. 10 Jahre nach den Goody-Thesen,” Historische Anthropologie 1 (1993): 149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, Jane. “Charles the Bald and the Government of the Kingdom of Aquitaine.” In Gibson and Nelson, Charles the Bald, 115–38.Google Scholar
Matecki, Berndt. Der Traktat In primis hominibus. Adnotationes in ius canonicum 20. Frankfurt am Main, 2001.Google Scholar
Mathisen, Ralph W. (ed.). Law, Society, and Authority in Late Antiquity. Oxford, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathon, Gérard. Le mariage des chrétiens. Tome I: Des origines au concile de Trente; Tome II: Du concile de Trente à nos jours. Bibliothèque d’Histoire du Christianisme 31, 34. Paris, 1993, 1994.Google Scholar
Il matrimonio nella società altomedievale. Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo 24. 2 vols. Spoleto, 1977.Google Scholar
Mattei, P.Le divorce chez Tertullian. Examen de la question à la lumière des développments que le De monogamia consacre à ce sujet.” Revue des sciences religieuses 60 (1986): 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matter, E. Ann. The Voice of my Beloved: The Song of Songs in Western Medieval Christianity. Philadelphia, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattheeuws, Alain. Les “Dons” du marriage. Recherche de théologie morale et sacramentelle. Ouvertures 19. Bruxelles, 1996.Google Scholar
Matthews, John E. “Interpreting the Interpretationes of the Breviarium.” In Mathisen, Law, Society, and Authority, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, John E. Laying Down the Law: A Study of the Theodosian Code. New Haven, 2000.Google Scholar
Mattia, G. di.Il decreto Tametsi e le sue radici nel concilio di Bologna.” Apollinaris 53 (1980): 476500.Google Scholar
Mattox, Mickey L. “Luther on Eve, Women, and the Church.” In Wengert, The Pastoral Luther, 251–70.Google Scholar
McAuley, Finbarr. “Canon Law and the End of the Ordeal.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26.3 (2006): 473513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCain, Paul T.Receiving the Gifts of God in His Two Kingdoms.” Logia 8.3 (1999): 2940.Google Scholar
McDonagh, Enda (ed.). The Meaning of Christian Marriage. New York, 1963.Google Scholar
McDougall, Sarah. Bigamy and Christian Identity in Late Medieval Champagne. Philadelphia, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, Sarah. “The Making of Marriage in Medieval France.” Journal of Family History 38.2 (2013): 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, Sarah. “The Prosecution of Sex in Late Medieval Troyes.” In Classen, Sexuality in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times, 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, James. “Grosseteste’s Reflections on Aristotelian Friendship: A ‘New’ Commentary on Nicomachean Ethics VIII.” In McEvoy, Robert Grosseteste: New Perspectives, 149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, James (ed.). Robert Grosseteste: New Perspectives on His Thought and Scholarship. Instrumenta Patristica et Mediaevalia 27. Turnhout, 1995.Google Scholar
McGovan, R. J.Augustine’s Spiritual Equality: The Allegory of Man and Woman with regard to imago Dei.” Revue des études augustiniennes 33 (1987): 255–64.Google Scholar
McKeon, Peter R.The Carolingian Councils of Savonnièrres (859) and Tusey (860) and Their Background.” Revue Bénédictine 84 (1974): 75100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Eleanor. “Equality of Souls, Inequality of Sexes: Women in Medieval Theology.” In Ruether, Religion and Sexism, 213–66.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Megan. “The Bishop as Bridegroom: Marital Imagery and Clerical Celibacy in the Eleventh and Early Twelfth Centuries.” In Frassetto, Medieval Purity and Piety, 209–37.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Megan. “The Church as Bride in Late Anglo-Saxon and Norman England.” In Aurell, Les strategies matrimoniales, 257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Megan. Sex, Gender, and Episcopal Authority in an Age of Reform, 1000–1122. Cambridge, 2010.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Terence P.The Formation of the Marriage Bond According to the Summa Parisiensis.” Mediaeval Studies 15 (1953): 208–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Jo-Ann and Wemple, Suzanne F.. “Marriage and divorce in the Frankish Kingdom.” In Stuard, Women in Medieval Society, 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Jo-Ann and Wemple, Suzanne F.. “The Power of Women through the Family in Medieval Europe: 500–1100.” Feminist Studies 1.3–4 (1973): 126–41.Google Scholar
McSheffrey, Shannon. “‘I Will Never Have None against My father’s Will’: Consent and the Making of Marriage in the Late Medieval Diocese of London.” In Rousseau and Rosenthal Women, Marriage, and Family, 153–74.Google Scholar
McSheffrey, Shannon. Marriage, Sex, and Civic Culture in Late Medieval London. Philadelphia, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSheffrey, Shannon. “Place, Space, and Situation: Public and Private in the Making of Marriage in Late-Medieval London.” Speculum 79.4 (2004): 960–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medieval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard. Vol. 1, ed. G. R. Evans; Vol. 2, ed. P. W. Rosemann. Leiden, 2002, 2009.Google Scholar
Meeks, Christine and Simms, Katharine (eds.). “The Fragility of Her Sex”? Medieval Irishwomen in Their European Context. Dublin, 1996.Google Scholar
Meigne, Maurice. “Concile ou collection d’Elvire?Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique 70 (1975): 361–87.Google Scholar
Mélanges Joseph de Ghellinck, S. J. 2 vols. Museum Lessianum, Section historique, no. 13. Gembloux, 1951.Google Scholar
Mandonnet, Mélanges. Études d’histoire littéraire et doctrinale du moyen âge. 2 vols. Bibliothèque thomiste 1314. Paris, 1930.Google Scholar
Mélanges Paul Fournier. Publiées sous les auspices de la Société d’histoire du droit. Paris: Sirey, 1929.Google Scholar
Mellick, H.In Defence of a Fifteenth-Century Manuscript.” Parergon 8 (1974): 2024.Google Scholar
Merêa, Paulo. “Le mariage sine consensu parentum dans le droit romain vulgaire occidental.” Mélanges Fernand Visscher IV = Revue internationale des droits le l’antiquité 5 (1950): 203–17.Google Scholar
Métral, Marie-Odile. Le mariage. Les hésitations de l’Occident. Paris, 1977.Google Scholar
Metz, René. La consécretation des vierges dans l’Église romaine. Étude d’histoire de la liturgie. Paris, 1954.Google Scholar
Metz, René. “Le statut de la femme en droit canonique médiévale.” Société Jean Bodin, Recueils 12 (1962): 59113.Google Scholar
Metz, René. “Recherches sur la condition de la femme selon Gratien.” Studia Gratiana 12 (1967): 379–96.Google Scholar
Mews, Constant J. Abelard and His Legacy. Variorum Collected Studies Series. Aldershot, 2001.Google Scholar
Mews, Constant J.Orality, Literacy and Authority in the Twelfth-Century Schools.” Exemplaria 2 (1990): 475500. [Repr. in Mews, Reason and Belief in the Age of Roscelin and Abelard.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mews, Constant J. Reason and Belief in the Age of Roscelin Abelard. Variorum Collected Studies Series. Aldershot, 2002.Google Scholar
Mews, Constant J.The Sententie of Peter Abelard.” RThAM 53 (1986): 130–84. [Repr. in Mews, Abelard and His Legacy.]Google Scholar
Meyendorff, John. Marriage: An Orthodox Perspective. New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Meyendorff, John. “Christian Marriage in Byzantium: The Canonical and Liturgical Tradition.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 44 (1990): 99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Herbert. “Friedelehe und Mutterrecht.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, germanistiche Abteiliung 47 (1927): 198286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezger, F.Did the Institution of Marriage by Purchase Exist in the Old Germanic Law?Speculum 18.3 (1943): 369–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaélidès, Dimitri. Sacramentum chez Tertullian. Paris, 1970.Google Scholar
Milhaven, John Giles. “Aquinas on Sexual Pleasure.” Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (1977): 157–81.Google Scholar
Miller, Geoffrey David. Marriage in the Book of Tobit. Berlin and New York, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jeremy. “A Note on Aquinas and the Ordination of Women.” New Blackfriars 61 (1980): 185–90.Google Scholar
Miller, Maureen C. “Clerical Identity and Reform: Notarial Descriptions of the Secular Clergy in the Po Valley, 750–1200.” In Frassetto, Medieval Purity and Piety, 305–35.Google Scholar
Miller, Maureen C.Masculinity, Reform, and Clerical Culture: Narratives of Episcopal Holiness in the Gregorian Era.” Church History 72.1 (2003): 2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Maureen C.Why the Bishop of Florence Had to Get Married.” Speculum 81.4 (2006): 1055–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnich, Nelson M.The Voice of Theologians in General Councils from Pisa to Trent.” Theological Studies 59.3 (1998): 420–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnis, Alastair. “De impedimento sexus: Women’s Bodies and Medieval Impediments to Female Ordination.” In Biller and Minnis, Medieval Theology and the Natural Body, 109–39.Google Scholar
Mirkovic, Miroslava. The Later Roman Colonate and Freedom. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 87.2. Philadelphia, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitterauer, Michael. “Christianity and Endogamy.” Continuity and Change 6.3 (1991): 293333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molin, Jean-Baptiste. “Symboles, rites et textes du mariage au moyen âge latin.” In Farnedi, La celebrazione cristiana del matrimonio, = Studia Anselmiana 93, = Analecta liturgica 11 (Rome, 1986): 107–27.Google Scholar
Molin, Jean-Baptiste and Mutembe, Protais. Le rituel du mariage en France du XIIe au XVIe siècle. Théologie historique 26. Paris, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Philip S. The Works of Peter of Poitiers, Master in Theology and Chancellor of Paris (1193–1205). Publications in Mediaeval Studies 1. Notre Dame, Ind., 1936.Google Scholar
Moore, R. I. “Property, Marriage, and the Eleventh-Century Revolution: A Context for Early Medieval Communism.” In Frassetto, Medieval Purity and Piety, 189–208.Google Scholar
Morelle, Laurent. “Marriage and Diplomatics: Five Dower Charters from the Regions of Laons and Soissons, 1163–1181.” THTH 165–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morelle, Laurent. “Marriage et diplomatique: Autour de cinq chartes de douaire dans le Laonnois-Soissonnais 1163–1181.” Bibliothèque de l’École des chartes 146 (1988): 225–71.Google Scholar
Morelle, Laurent. “Une charte nuptiale laonnoise de 1158 conservée en original.” Bibliothèque de l’École des chartes 168 (2010): 209–24.Google Scholar
Mordek, Hubert (ed.). Aus Archiven und Bibliotheken. Festschrift für Raymund Kottje zum 65. Geburtstag. Freiburger Beiträge zur Mittelalterlichen Geschichte, Studien und Texte, Bd 3. Frankfurt am Main, 1992.Google Scholar
Morenzoni, Franco. Des écoles aux paroisses. Thomas de Chobham et la promotion de la prédication au début du XIIIe siècle. EAMA 30. Paris, 1995.Google Scholar
Morenzoni, Franco and Tilliette, Jean-Yves (eds.). Autour de Guillaime d’Auvergne († 1249). Turnhout, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Colin. The Papal Monarchy: The Western Church from 1050 to 1250. Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Beth M. The Relation of the Juridical and Sacramental according to Thomas Aquinas. Dissertation, Universität Freiburg. Freiburg, Schweiz, 2012.Google Scholar
Moule, Carolyn Janet. Entry into Marriage in the Late Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (c. 1090–1181) Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar
Mousourakis, George. The Historical and Institutional Context of Roman Law. Aldershot, U.K., 2003.Google Scholar
Mullenders, J. B. Le mariage presumé. Analecta Gregoriana 181. Rome, 1971.Google Scholar
Müller, Michael. Die Lehre des hl. Augustinus von der Paradiesehe und ihre Auswirkung in der Sexualethik des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts bis Thomas von Aquin. Regensburg, 1954.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang P. and Sommar, Mary E. (eds.). Medieval Church Law and the Origins of the Western Legal Tradition: A Tribute to Kenneth Pennington. Washington, D.C., 2006.Google Scholar
Munier, Charles. “Divorce, remariage et pénitence dans L’Église primitive.” Revue des sciences religieuses 52 (1978): 97117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munier, Charles. Mariage et virginité dans l’Église ancienne Ier–IIIe siècles. Traditio Christiana 6. Berne and New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Munk, Connie M. A Study of Pope Innocent III’s Treatise, De quadripartita specie nuptiarum. Dissertation, University of Kansas, 1975.Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean E.Concern about Judaizing in Academic Treatises on the Law, c. 1130–c. 1230.” Speculum 82.3 (2007): 560–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Jacqueline (ed.). Conflicted Identities and Multiple Masculinities: Men in the Medieval West. New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Murray, Jacqueline. “Gendered Souls in Sexed Bodies: The Male Construction of Sexuality in Some Medieval Confessors’ Manuals.” In Biller and Minnis, Handling Sin, 79–93.Google Scholar
Murray, Jacqueline “Individualism and Consensual Marriage: Some Evidence from Medieval England.” In Rousseau and Rosenthal, Women, Marriage, and the Family, 121–51.Google Scholar
Murray, Jacqueline. “Masculinizing Religious Life: Sexual Prowess, the Battle for Chastity, and Monastic Identity.” In Cullum and Lewis, Holiness and Masculinity in the Middle Ages, 24–42.Google Scholar
Murray, Jacqueline and Eisenbichler, Konrad (eds.). Sex and Sexuality in the Premodern West. Toronto, 1996.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert. Symbols of Church and Kingdom: A Study in Early Syriac Tradition. London and New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Musson, Anthony (ed.). Boundaries of the Law: Geography, Gender and Jurisprudence in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Aldershot, 2005.Google Scholar
Nautin, Pierre. “Divorce et remariage dans la tradition de l’église latine. Quelques reflexions de méthodologie historique.” Recherches de science religieuse 62 (1974): 754.Google Scholar
Nautin, Pierre. “Divorce et remarriage chez saint Épiphane.” Vigiliae Christianae 37 (1983): 157–73.Google Scholar
Nelson, Janet L. Charles the Bald. London, 1992.Google Scholar
Nelson, Janet L. Politics and Ritual in Early Medieval Europe. London and Ronceverte, 1986.Google Scholar
Nelson, Janet L. “Queens as Jezebels: The Careers of Brunhild and Balthild in Merovingian History.” In Nelson, Politics and Ritual, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Catholic Encyclopedia. 18 vols. New York and Washington, D.C., 1967–1988.Google Scholar
Newman, William A. Jus Divinum and the Sacrament of Penance in Two Tridentine Theologians: Melchior Cano and Ruard Tapper. Dissertation, Catholic University of America. Washington, D.C., 1969.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Barry. An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford, 1962.Google Scholar
Nichols, Ann Eljenholm. Seeable Signs: The Iconography of the Seven Sacraments, 1350–1544. Woodbridge, U.K., and Rochester, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Nickson, Margaret A. E.The ‘Pseudo-Reinerius’ Treatise: The Final Stage of a Thirteenth-Century Work on Heresy from the Diocese of Passau.” AHDLMA 34 (1967): 255314.Google Scholar
Nolan, Michael. “Aquinas and the Act of Love.” In New Blackfriars 77 (1996): 115130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nold, Patrick. Marriage Advice for a Pope: John XXII and the Power to Dissolve. Leiden, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr. Canons and Canonists in Context. Goldbach, 1997. [Collected essays.]Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr. Contraception: A History of Its Treatment by the Catholic Theologians and Canonists. Cambridge, 1965.Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr.Marital affection in the canonists.” Studia Gratiana 12 (1967), = Collectanea Stephan Kuttner II (Bologna, 1967), 479509.Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr. “Novel 22.” In Bassett, The Bond of Marriage, 41–90.Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr. Power to Dissolve: Lawyers and Marriages in the Courts of the Roman Curia. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, Harvard Univ. Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr.Power to choose.” Viator 4 (1973): 419–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr. “Who Was Rolandus?” In Pennington and Somerville, Law, Church and Society, 21–48.Google Scholar
Norris, T.Why the Marriage of Christians Is One of the Seven Sacraments.” Irish Theological Quarterly 51 (1985): 3751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, William L., Rubenstein, Jay, and Cotts, John D.. “The Experience of Reform: Three Perspectives.” In Murillo, Stephen (ed.), Haskins Society Journal 10 (Woodbridge, 2002), 113–61.Google Scholar
Nörr, Dieter. “The Matrimonial Legislation of Augustus: An Early Instance of Social Engineering.” Irish Jurist 16 (1981): 350–64.Google Scholar
Ó Corráin, Donnchadh. “Marriage in Early Ireland.” In Cosgrove, Marriage in Ireland, 5–24.Google Scholar
O’Malley, John W. Trent: What Happened at the Council. Cambridge, MA, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, John J. and Bieler, Ludwig (eds.). The Mind of Eriugena. Dublin, 1973.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko. A. Luther: Man Between God and the Devil. Trans. Walliser-Schwarzbart, E.. New Haven, 1989.Google Scholar
Oesterlé, G. “Consanguinité.” DDC 4:232–48.Google Scholar
Oesterlé, G. “Privilège Paulin.” DDC 7:229–80.Google Scholar
Olsen, Viggo N. New Testament Logia on Divorce: A Study of Their Interpretation from Erasmus to Milton. Tübingen, 1971.Google Scholar
Osborne Kenan, B. (ed.). “Alexander of Hales.” In Osborne, History of Franciscan Theology, 1–38.Google Scholar
Osborne Kenan, B. (ed.). The History of Franciscan Theology. St Bonaventure, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Osuna, Belén M.; and García, Carmen O.. “Pretium pudicitiae y donación nupcial.” Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos 26 (2004): 6184.Google Scholar
Ott, Ludwig. Untersuchungen zur theologischen Briefliteratur der Frühscholastik unter besonderer berücksichtigung des Viktorinerkreises. BGPhThMA 34. Münster, 1937.Google Scholar
Ott, Ludwig. “Walter von Mortagne und Petrus Lombardus in ihrem Verhältnis zueinander.” In Mélanges Joseph de Ghellinck, 2:647–97.Google Scholar
Otten, Willemien. “Augustine on Marriage, Monasticism, and the Community of the Church.” Theological Studies 59 (1998): 385405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outhwaite, R. B. Clandestine marriage in England, 1500–1850. London, 1995.Google Scholar
Outhwaite, R. B.. (ed.). Marriage and Society: Studies in the Social History of Marriage. New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Ozment, Steven. The Age of Reform 1250–1550: An Intellectual and Religious History of Late Medieval and Reformation Europe. New Haven, 1980.Google Scholar
Ozment, Steven. When Fathers Ruled: Family Life in Reformation Europe. Cambridge, MA, 1983.Google Scholar
Oxford Classical Dictionary. Ed. Hornblower, Simon, Spawforth, Anthony, and Eidinow, Esther. 4th edition. Oxford, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford Guide to the Historical Reception of Augustine. Ed. Pollmann, Karla, Otten, Willemien, et al. 3 vols. Oxford, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabel, Hilmar M. “Exegesis and Marriage in Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament.” In Pabel and Vessey, Holy Scripture Speaks, 175–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabel, Hilmar M. and Vessey, Mark (eds.). Holy Scripture Speaks: The Production and Reception of Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament. Toronto, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. “The School of Salamanca.” In Klosko, Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, 246–57.Google Scholar
Parish, Helen L. Clerical Celibacy in the West, c.1100–1700. Farnham, Surrey, 2009.Google Scholar
Parisse, Michel. “Préambules de chartes.” In Hamesse, Prologues, 141–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisse, Michel. Veuves et veuvage dans le haut moyen âge. Table ronde organisée à Göttingen par la Mission Historique Française en Allemagne. Paris, 1993.Google Scholar
Payer, Pierre J.. The Bridling of Desire. Views of Sex in the Later Middle Ages. Toronto, 1993.Google Scholar
Payer, Pierre J.. “Early Medieval Regulations Concerning Marital Sexual Regulations.” Journal of Medieval History 6 (1980): 353–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payer, Pierre J.. “Foucault on Penance and the Shaping of Sexuality.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 14.3 (1985): 313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payer, Pierre J. Sex and the Penitentials. Toronto, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John B. Erasmus: His Theology of the Sacraments (Richmond, Virginia, 1971).Google Scholar
Pedersen, Frederik. “Did the Medieval Laity Know the Canon Law Rules on Marriage? Some Evidence from Fourteenth-Century York Cause Papers.” Mediaeval Studies 56 (1994): 89109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Frederik. Marriage Disputes in Medieval England. London, 2000.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Frederik. “Marriage Contracts and the Church Courts of Fourteenth-Century England.” THTH 287–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. “The Decretalists 1190 to 1234.” In Hartmann and Pennington, History of Medieval Canon Law, 211–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. The Prince and the Law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition. Berkeley, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. Popes, Canonists, and Texts, 1150–1550. Variorum Reprints. Aldershot, 1993.Google Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. “Pope Innocent III’s Views on Church and State: A Gloss to Per Venerabilem. In Pennington and Somerville, Law, Church and Society, 49–67. [Repr. with corrections in Pennington, Popes, Canonists, and Texts.Google Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth and Somerville, Robert (eds.). Law, Church and Society: Essays in Honor of Stephan Kuttner. Philadelphia, 1977.Google Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth and Müller, W. P.. “The Decretists: The Italian School.” In Hartmann and Pennington, The History of Medieval Canon Law, 121–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peper, Bradley M.On the Mark: Augustine’s Baptismal Analogy of the nota militaris.” Augustinian Studies 38.2 (2007): 353–63.Google Scholar
Perdue, Leo G., Blenkinsopp, Joseph, Collins, John C., and Meyers, Carol. Families in Ancient Israel. The Family, Religion, and Culture series. Louisville, 1997.Google Scholar
Peters, Christine. “Gender, Sacrament and Ritual: The Making and Meaning of Marriage in Late Medieval and Early Modern England.” Past and Present 169 (2000): 6396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, François. “Gauthier de Mortagne.” Analecta Praemonstratensia 50 (1974): 158–70.Google Scholar
Philippe, M.-D.Analogon and Analogia in the Philosophy of Aristotle.” The Thomist 33 (1969): 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, Joanne. “A Note on the Ego vos conjungo in Medieval French Marriage Liturgy.” Ephemerides Liturgicae 99 (1985): 290–99.Google Scholar
Pilsner, Joseph. The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas. Oxford Theological Monographs series. Oxford, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinckaers, Servais. “Ce que le moyen âge pensait du mariage.” La vie spirituelle, supp. 20 (1967): 413–30.Google Scholar
Pinto de Oliveira, Carlos-Josaphat (ed.). Ordo Sapientiae et Amoris. Image et message de saint Thomas d’Aquin à travers les récentes études historiques, herméneutiques et doctrinales. Hommage au professeur Jean-Pierre Torrell à l’occasion de son 65e anniversaire. Studia Friburgensia. Fribourg, 1993.Google Scholar
Plumpe, Joseph. Mater Ecclesia: An Inquiry into the Concept of the Church as Mother in Early Christianity. Catholic University of America Studies in Christian Antiquity 5. Washington, D.C., 1943.Google Scholar
Pohle, Joseph. The Sacraments: A Dogmatic Treatise. Trans. Arthur Preuss. 4 vols. St. Louis, 1915–1917. [Translation of Die allgemeine und spezielle Sakramentenlehre, 5th edition.]Google Scholar
Poirel, Dominique. “Love of God, Human Love: Hugh of St. Victor and the Sacrament of Marriage.” Communio 24 (1997): 99109.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederic and Maitland, Frederic W.. The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I. 2 vols. 2nd edition. Cambridge, 1898.Google Scholar
Posthumous-Meyjes, G. H. M. “Exponents of Sovereignty: Canonists as Seen by Theologians in the Late Middle Ages.” In Wood, The Church and Sovereignty, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourrat, Pierre. Theology of the Sacraments: A Study in Positive Theology. Authorized Translation of the Third Edition. St. Louis, Mo., 1910.Google Scholar
Power, Kim. “Concubine/Concubinage.” In Fitzgerald, Augustine through the Ages, 222–23.Google Scholar
Powicke, and Cheney, , Councils & Synods: See bibliography of primary sources.Google Scholar
Preston, Patrick. “Catherinus versus Luther, 1521.” History 88.3 (2003): 364–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Principe, Walter H. “Guerric of Saint-Quentin, O.P., on the question: Utrum Filius Dei esset incarnatus si homo non peccasset?” In Pinto de Oliveira, Ordo Sapientiae et Amoris, 509–37.Google Scholar
Principe, Walter H. “Preternatural.” New Catholic Encyclopedia 11:763–64.Google Scholar
Principe, Walter H. Quaestiones concerning Christ from the First Half of the Thirteenth Century.” Mediaeval Studies 39 (1977): 159; 42 (1980): 1–40; 43 (1981): 1–57; 44 (1982): 1–82; 50 (1988): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Problèmes doctrinaux du mariage chrétien. Commission théologique internationale. Louvain-la-Neuve, 1979.Google Scholar
Provost, James H. and Walf, Knut (eds.). Ius Sequitur Vitam: Studies in Canon Law Presented to P. J. M. Huizing. Louvain, 1991.Google Scholar
Quinn, John F. “Bonaventure.” Dictionary of the Middle Ages, 2:313–19.Google Scholar
Quinn, John F.Chronology of St. Bonaventure (1217–1274).” Franciscan Studies 32 (1972): 168–86.Google Scholar
Quinn, John F.St Bonaventure and the Sacrament of Matrimony.” Franciscan Studies 34 (1974): 101–43.Google Scholar
Quinto, Riccardo. “La constitution du texte des Quaestiones theologiae.” In Bataillon et al., Étienne Langton, 525–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, Jacob J.On the Definition of Marriage as consortium omnis vitae.” Harvard Theological Revue 57 (1964): 5556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raditsa, Leo F.Augustus’ Legislation concerning Marriage, Procreation, Love Affairs, and Adultery.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.13 (1980): 278339.Google Scholar
Randall, Dale B. J. (ed.). Medieval and Renaissance Studies, no. 6: Proceedings of the Southeastern Institute of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Summer, 1974 Durham, N.C., 1976.Google Scholar
Rawlings, Helen. Church, Religion and Society in Early Modern Spain. Houndmills, Basingstoke, U.K., 2002.Google Scholar
Rawson, Beryl (ed.). Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome. Oxford, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, Beryl (ed.). The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives. Ithaca, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Rawson, Beryl. “Children in the Roman Familia.” In Rawson, The Family in Ancient Rome, 170–200Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Heinrich J. F. Die Ehelehre der Schule des Anselm von Laon. Eine theologie- und kirchenrechtsgeschichtlliche Untersuchung zu den Ehetexten der frühen Pariser Schule des 12. Jahrhunderts. BGPhThMA, neue Folge, Bd. 14. Münster, 1974.Google Scholar
Reekmans, Louis. “La dextrarum iunctio dans l’iconographie romaine et paléochrétienne.” Bulletin de l’Institut Historique Belge de Rome 31 (1958): 2995.Google Scholar
Rees Jones, Sarah. “The Household and English Urban Government in the Later Middle Ages.” In Carlier and Soens, The Household in Late Medieval Cities, 71–87.Google Scholar
Renwart, Léon. “L’intention du ministre des sacraments, problème male posé? Un peu d’histoire.” Nouvelle revue théologique 81 (1959): 469–88.Google Scholar
Resnick, Irven M.Marriage in Mediaeval Culture: Consent Theory and the Case of Mary and Joseph.” Church History 69.2 (2000): 350–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, Amandus. Sancti Aurelii Augustini doctrina de bonis matrimonii. Analecta Gregoriana, vol. 27, Series Theologica, Sectio B (num. 12). Rome, 1942.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L.Analogy of Names in Bonaventure,” Mediaeval Studies 65 (2003): 117–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. Articles in the Oxford Guide to the Historical Reception of Augustine: “De adulterinis coniugiis,” 1:226–29; “De bono coniugali,” 1:243–46; “De bono viduitatis,” 1:246–50; “Marriage,” 3:1369–75.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L.Bonaventure on Gender and Godlikeness.” Downside Review 106 (1988): 171–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L.Bonaventure’s Theory of Resemblance.” Traditio 58 (2003): 219–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. “Efficient Causality and Instrumentality in Thomas Aquinas’s Theology of the Sacraments.” In Ginther and Steel, Essays in Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. Food and the Body: Some Peculiar Questions in High Medieval Theology. Leiden, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. Marriage in the Western Church. The Christianization of Marriage during the Patristic and Early Medieval Periods. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 24. Leiden, 1994. [Abbr. MWCh]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L.Marriage, Sacramental and Indissoluble: Sources of the Catholic doctrine.” Downside Review 109 (1991): 105–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. “Marrying and Its Documentation in Pre-Modern Europe: Consent, Celebration, and Property,” THTH 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L.Properties, Causality and Epistemological Optimism in Thomas Aquinas.” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 68 (2001): 270305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L.Scholastic Theology and the Case against Women’s Ordination.” Heythrop Journal 36 (1995): 249–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. “The Regional Origins of Theories about Marital Consent and Consummation during the Twelfth Century.” In Korpiola, Regional Variations, 43–75.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. “When Medieval Theologians Talked about Marriage, What Were They Really Talking about?” In Andersen, Salonen, Sigh, and Vogt, Law and Marriage in Medieval and Early Modern Times, 11–42.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Philip L. and Witte, John Jr. (eds.). To Have and to Hold: Marrying and Its Documentation in Western Europe, 4001600. Cambridge, 2007. [Abbr. THTH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruether, Rosemary Radford (ed.). Religion and Sexism: Images of Women in the Jewish and Christian Traditions. New York, 1974.Google Scholar
Ribordy, Geneviève. “Faire les nopces”: Le mariage de la noblesse française (1375–1475). Toronto, 2004.Google Scholar
Ribordy, Geneviève. “The Two Paths to Marriage: The Preliminaries of Noble Marriage in Late Medieval France.” Journal of Family History 26.3 (2001): 323–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardot, Hubert. Les pactes de séparation amiable des époux. Paris, 1930.Google Scholar
Riddle, John M. Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA, 1992.Google Scholar
Rider, Catherine. Magic and Impotence in the Middle Ages. Oxford, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riisøy, Anne I. Sexuality, Law and Legal Practice and the Reformation in Norway. The Northern World 44. Leiden, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rincón, Tomás. El matrimonio, misterio y signo: Siglos IX–XIII. Pamplona, 1971. [Second volume in the series, El matrimonio, misterio y signo.]Google Scholar
Rio, Alice. “Self-Sale and Voluntary Entry into Unfreedom, 300–1100.” Journal of Social History 45.3 (2012): 661–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritzer, Korbinian. Formen, Riten und religiöses Brauchtum der Eheschließung in den christlichen Kirchen des ersten Jahrtausands. 2nd edition. Münster, 1981. [1st edition published 1962.]Google Scholar
Ritzer, Korbinian. Le mariage dans les églises chrétiennes du Ier au XIe siècle. Paris, 1970. [Translation of 1st edition of Ritzer, Formen, Riten, und religiöses Brauchtum.]Google Scholar
Roberts, James B. The Banns of Marriage: An Historical Synopsis and Commentary. J.C.D. Dissertation. Catholic University of America Canon Law Studies, 64. Washington, D.C., 1931.Google Scholar
Robinson, Adam P. The Career of Cardinal Giovanni Morone (1509–1580): Between Council and Inquisition. Farnham, 2012.Google Scholar
Roche, W. J.Measure, Number, and Weight in Saint Augustine.” The New Scholasticism 15.4 (1941): 350–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocke, Michael J. Forbidden Friendships: Homosexuality and Male Culture in Renaissance Florence. New York, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocke, Michael J.Il controllo dell’omosessualità a Firenze nel XV secolo: Gli Ufficiali de Notte.” Quaderni Storici 66 (1987): 701–23.Google Scholar
Rolker, Christof. Canon Law and the Letters of Ivo of Chartres. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, Fourth Series. Cambridge, 2009.Google Scholar
Rolker, Christof. “Kings, Bishops and Incest: Extension and Subversion of the Ecclesiastical Marriage Jurisdiction around 1100.” In Cooper and Gregory, Discipline and Diversity, 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolker, Christof. “Two Models of Incest: Conflict and Confusion in High Medieval Discourse on Kinship and Marriage.” In Andersen et al., Law and Marriage in Medieval and Early Modern Times, 139–59.Google Scholar
Roman, J.Summa d’Huguccio sur le décret de Gratien d’après le manuscrit 3891 de la Bibliothèque Nationale, Causa XXVII, Quaestio II (Théories sur la formation du mariage).” Revue historique de droit français et étranger, 2nd series 27 (1903): 715805.Google Scholar
Romano, Dennis. Housecraft and Statecraft: Domestic Service in Renaissance Venice, 1400–1600. Baltimore, 1996.Google Scholar
Rondet, Henri. Introduction à l’étude de la théologie du mariage. Paris, 1960.Google Scholar
Roper, Lyndal. Oedipus and the Devil: Witchcraft, Religion and Sexuality in Early Modern Europe. London, 1994.Google Scholar
Roper, Lyndal. “Sexual Utopianism in the German Reformation.” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 42.3 (1991): 394418. [Repr. in Roper, Oedipus and the Devil, 80–105.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorem, Paul. “The Early Latin Dionysius: Eriugena and Hugh of St. Victor.” Modern Theology 24.4 (2008): 601–14. [Repr. as an appendix in Rorem, Hugh of Saint Victor, 167–76.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorem, Paul. Hugh of Saint Victor. Great Medieval Thinkers series. Oxford, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W. (ed.). Medieval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, vol. 2. Leiden, 2009.Google Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W.. Peter Lombard. Great Medieval Thinkers series. Oxford, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosemann, Philipp W.. The Story of a Great Medieval Book: Peter Lombard’s Sentences. Peterborough, Ontario, 2007.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. La parole efficace. Signe, rituel, sacré. Paris, 2004.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Signes sacramentels et signes magiques: Guillaume d’Auvergne et la théorie de pacte.” In Morenzoni and Tilliette, Autour de Guillaume d’Auvergne, 93–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Constance M.The Spousal Relationship: Marital Society and Sexuality in the Letters of Pope Innocent III.” Mediaeval Studies 56 (1994): 89109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Constance M. and Rosenthal, Joel T. (eds.). Women, Marriage, and Family in Medieval Christendom: Essays in Memory of Michael M. Sheehan, C.S.B. Kalamazoo, 1998.Google Scholar
Rouche, Michel (ed.). Mariage et sexualité au Moyen Age. Accord ou cris? Paris, 2000.Google Scholar
Ruggiero, Guido. The Boundaries of Eros: Sex Crime and Sexuality in Renaissance Venice. Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Rummel, Erika. Erasmus and His Catholic Critics. 2 vols. Bibliotheca Humanistica et Reformatorica. Nieuwkoop, 1989.Google Scholar
Rushforth, G. McN.Seven Sacraments Compositions in English Medieval Art.” Antiquaries Journal 9.2 (1929): 83100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J. Joseph. “Saint Peter Damiani and the Sermons of Nicholas of Clairvaux: A Clarification.” Mediaeval Studies 9 (1947): 151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Liam. “The Indissolubility of Marriage in Natural Law: A Disputed Point in the Teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas.” Irish Theological Quarterly 30 (1963): 293310, and 31 (1964): 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, Risto. “Ethics in Luther’s Theology: The Three Orders.” In Kraye and Saarinen, Moral Philosophy on the Threshold of Modernity, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacré, Dirk and Tournoy, Gilbert (eds.). Myricae: Essays on Neo-Latin Literature in Memory of Jozef Ijsewijn. Supplementa Humanistica Lovaniensia 16. Leuven, 2000.Google Scholar
Sahaydachny Bocarius, Antonina. “The Marriage of Unfree Persons: Twelfth-Century Decretals and Letters.” In Landau and Petzolt, De iure canonico Medii Aevi, 483–506.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Eve (ed.). The Trials and Joys of Marriage. TEAMS Middle English Texts series. Kalamazoo, 2002.Google Scholar
Saller, Richard P.Men’s Age at Marriage and Its Consequences in the Roman Family.” Classical Philology 82 (1987): 2134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saller, Richard P. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge Studies in Population, Economy and Society in Past Time. Cambridge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saller, Richard P.Patria potestas and the Stereotype of the Roman Family.” Continuity and Change 1 (1986): 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampley, J. Paul.And the Two Shall Become One Flesh”: A Study of Traditions in Ephesians 5:21–33. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 16. Cambridge, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Lucy F.The Handclasp in the Arnolfini Wedding: A Manuscript Precedent.” The Art Bulletin 66.3 (1984): 488–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santinelli, Emmanuelle. Des femmes éplorées? Les veuves dans la société aristocratique du haut Moyen Âge. Paris, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satlow, Michael L. Jewish Marriage in Antiquity. Princeton, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Corinne J. Rape and Ravishment in the Literature of Medieval England. Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
Sayers, Jane E. Papal Judges Delegate in the Province of Canterbury, 1198–1254: A Study in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Administration. Oxford, 1971.Google Scholar
Scalco, Eugenio. “Sacramentum conniubii et institution nuptiale.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 69 (1993): 2747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarisbrick, J. J. Henry VIII. Berkeley, 1968.Google Scholar
Schahl, Claude. La doctrine des fins du mariage dans la théologie scholastique. Paris, 1948.Google Scholar
Schaus, Margaret (ed.). Women and Gender in Medieval Europe: An Encyclopedia. New York, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, Walter. “Roman Funerary Commemoration and the Age at First Marriage.” Classical Philology 102.4 (2007): 389402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillebeeckx, Édouard. Marriage: Secular Reality and Saving Mystery. Trans. Smith, N. D.. 2 vols. London and Melbourne: Sheed and Ward, 1965. [One-volume edition: London, 1976.]Google Scholar
Schlatter, Frederic W.The Author of the Opus imperfectum in Matthaeum.” Vigiliae Christianae 42 (1988): 364–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Emile. Le mariage chrétien dans l’oeuvre de saint Augustin. Une théologie baptismale de la vie conjugale. Paris, 1983.Google Scholar
Schmitt, J.Tradition et relectures au premier siècle chrétien.” RDC 30 (1980): 5568.Google Scholar
Schmugge, Ludwig. Marriage on Trial: Late Medieval German Couples at the Papal Court. Trans. Larson, Atria A.. Washington, D.C., 2012. [Originally published as Ehen vor Gericht: Paare der Renaissance vor dem Papst. Berlin, 2008.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnell, Rüdiger. “The Discourse on Marriage in the Middle Ages.” Speculum 73 (1998): 771–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoovaerts, M. Gustaf, “L’amour et le mariage selon les lettres d’Yves de Chartres.” Studia Canonica 22 (1988): 305–25.Google Scholar
Schott, Clausdieter. “Der stand der Leges-Forchung.” Frümittelalterliche Studien 13 (1979): 2955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Johann Friedrich von. Die Geschichte der Quellen und Literatur des canonischen Rechts von Gratian bis auf die Gegenwart. 3 vols in 4. Stuttgart, 18751880. [Repr. Graz, 1956.]Google Scholar
Schumpp, Meinrad M. Das Buch Tobias. Münster in Westfalen, 1933.Google Scholar
Scott, Kieran and Warren, Michael (eds.). Perspectives on Marriage: A Reader. New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Searle, Mark and Stevenson, Kenneth W.. Documents of the Marriage Liturgy. Collegeville, Minnesota, 1992.Google Scholar
Sears, Elizabeth and Thomas, Thelma K. (eds.). Reading Medieval Images: The Art Historian and the Object. Ann Arbor, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seed, Patricia. “The Church and the Patriarchal Family: Marriage Conflicts in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century New Spain.” Journal of Family History 10.3 (1985): 284–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seed, Patricia. To Love, Honor, and Obey in Colonial Mexico: Conflicts over Marriage Choice, 1574–1821. Stanford, California, 1988.Google Scholar
Selderhuis, Herman J. Marriage and Divorce in the Thought of Martin Bucer. Trans. Vriend, J. and Bierma, L. D.. Sixteenth Century Studies 48. Kirksville, MS, 1999.Google Scholar
Selig, Karl-Ludwig and Somerville, Robert (eds.). Florilegium Columbianum: Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
Shanzer, Danuta. “Avulsa a latere meo: Augustine’s Spare Rib — Confessions 6.15.21.” Journal of Roman Studies 92 (2002): 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Brent D.The Age of Roman Girls at Marriage: Some Reconsiderations.” Journal of Roman Studies 77 (1987): 3046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M. Marriage, Family, and Law in Medieval Europe: Collected Studies. Ed. Farge, James K.. Toronto, 1996.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M. “The Bishop of Rome to a Barbarian King on the Rituals of Marriage.” In Sheehan and Farge, Marriage, Family, and Law, 278–291.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M.Choice of Marriage Partner in the Middle Ages: Development and Mode of Application of a Theory of Marriage.” Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History, NS 1 (1978): 333. [Repr. in Marriage, Family, and Law in Medieval Europe, 87–117.]Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M. “Family and Marriage, Western European.” Dictionary of the Middle Ages 14:608–12.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M. “Maritalis affectio Revisited.” In Sheehan and Farge, Marriage, Family, and Law, 262–277.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M. “Marriage and Family in English Conciliar and Synodal Legislation.” In Sheehan and Farge, Marriage, Family, and Law, 77–86.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M.Marriage Theory and Practice in the Conciliar Legislation and Diocesan Statutes of Medieval England.” Mediaeval Studies 40 (1978): 408–60. [Repr. in Marriage, Family, and Law, 118–76.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M. “Sexuality, Marriage, Celibacy, and the Family in Central and Northern Italy: Christian Legal and Moral Guides in the Early Middle Ages. ” In Sheehan and Farge, Marriage, Family, and Law, 292–310.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M. “The European Family and the Cannon Law.” In Sheehan and Farge, Marriage, Family, and Law, 247–261.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M.The Formation and Stability of Marriage in 14th Century England: Evidence of an Ely Register.” Mediaeval Studies 33 (1971): 228–63. [Repr. in Sheehan and Farge, Marriage, Family, and Law, 38–76.]Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael M.Theory and Practice: Marriage of the Unfree and the Poor in Medieval Society.” Mediaeval Studies 50 (1988): 457–87. [Repr. in Sheehan and Farge, Marriage, Family, and Law, 211–46.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirt, David J.Cligés – A Twelfth-Century Matrimonial Case Book?Forum for Modern Language Studies 18 (1982): 7589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogimen, Takashi. “The Relationship between Theology and Canon Law: Another Context of Political Thought in the Early Fourteenth Century.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60.3 (1999): 417–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvain, René. “La tradition des Sentences d’Anselme de Laon.” AHDLMA 16 (1948): 152.Google Scholar
Sirks, Adriaan J. B.The episcopalis audientia in Late Antiquity.” Droit et cultures 65 (2013): 7988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, David C. The Gospel of Matthew and Christian Judaism: The History and Social Setting of the Matthean Community. Edinburgh, 1998.Google Scholar
Simonin, Henri-Dominique. “Le écrits de Pierre de Tarentaise.” In Beatus Innocentius, 163–335.Google Scholar
Simonin, Henri-Dominique and Meersseman, G.. De sacramentorum efficientia apud theologos ord. praed. Fasc. I: 1229–1276. Rome, 1936.Google Scholar
Smith, Lesley. The Glossa Ordinaria: The Making of Medieval Bible Commentary. Leiden, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Lesley. “William of Auvergne and Confession.” In Biller and Minnis, Handling Sin, 95–107.Google Scholar
Smith, Lesley and Ward, Benedicta (eds.). Intellectual Life in the Middle Ages: Essays Presented to Margaret Gibson. London, 1992.Google Scholar
Smith, Charles E. Papal Enforcement of Some Medieval Marriage Laws. Louisiana, 1940.Google Scholar
Somerville, Robert. Review of Maas, The Liber Sententiarum Magistri A. (1995). Speculum 74 (1999): 207–09.Google Scholar
Sommar, Mary E. The Correctores Romani: Gratia’s Decretum and the Counter-Reformation Humanists. Pluralisierung & Autorität, Bd. 19. Berlin, 2009.Google Scholar
Sommar, Mary E. “Twelfth-Century Scholarly Exchanges.” In Müller and Sommar, Medieval Church Law, 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern, Richard W. Scholastic Humanism and the Unification of Europe. Vol. 1: Foundations; Vol. 2: The Heroic Age. Oxford, 1995, 2001.Google Scholar
Sperling, Jutta. “Marriage at the Time of the Council of Trent (1560–70): Clandestine Marriages, Kinship Prohibitions, and Dowry Exchange in European Comparison.” Journal of Early Modern History 8.1–2 (2004): 67108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, Harvey. “Eve’s Reach: A Note on the Dramatic Elements in the Hildesheim Doors.” In Sears and Thomas, Reading Medieval Images, 163–75.Google Scholar
Ste. Croix, Geoffrey E. M. de. Christian Persecution, Martyrdom, and Orthodoxy. Edited by Whitby, M. and Streeter, J.. Oxford, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, Friedrich. “Sententie Berolinenses: Eine neugefundene Sentenzensammlung aus der Schule des Anselm von Laon.” RThAM 11 (1939): 3361Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. “Vacarius and the Civil Law.” In Brooke et al., Church and Government in the Middle Ages, 119–38.Google Scholar
Stephenson, John R.The Two Governments and the Two Kingdoms in Luther’s Thought,” Scottish Journal of Theology 34.4 (1981): 321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Kenneth W. The Nuptial Blessing: A Study of Christian Marriage Rites. London, 1982. [Repr. New York, 1983.]Google Scholar
Stevenson, Kenneth W.The Origins of the Nuptial Blessing.” Heythrop Journal 21 (1980): 412416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinnisen, Wilfried. Aristoteles over de Vriendschap: Boeken VIII en IX van de Nicomachische Ethiek med de commentaren van Aspasius en Michaël in de Latijnse vertaling van Grosseteste. Brussels, 1963.Google Scholar
Stock, Brian. The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Princeton, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. “Passionate Attachments in the West in Historical Perspective.” In Scott and Warren, Perspectives on Marriage, 171–79.Google Scholar
Stone, Rachel. “‘Bound from Either Side’: The Limits of Power in Carolingian Marriage Disputes.” Gender and History 19.3 (2007): 467–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, Ulrike. State of Virginity: Gender, Religion, and Politics in an Early Modern Catholic State. Ann Arbor, 2004.Google Scholar
Strocchia, Sharon T. “Naming a Nun: Spiritual Exemplars and Corporate Identity in Florentine Convents, 1450–1530.” In Connell, Society and the Individual in Renaissance Florence, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strocchia, Sharon T.When the Bishop Married the Abbess: Masculinity and Power in Florentine Episcopal Entry Rites, 1300–1600.” Gender and History 19 (2007): 346–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuard, Susan Mosher (ed.). Women in Medieval Society. Philadelphia, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbings, Frank. “The Art of Good Living (STC 791).” Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society 10.4 (1994): 535–38.Google Scholar
Studer, Basile. “‘Sacramentum et exemplum’ chez saint Augustin.” Recherches augustiniennes 10 (1975): 87141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studi in onore di Alberto Pincherle. Studi et materiali di storia delle religioni 38. Rome, 1967.Google Scholar
Studia Mediaevalia in honorem admodum Reverendi Patris Raymundi Josephi Martin. Bruges, [1948].Google Scholar
Sutton, Kenneth M. The Papacy and the Levant (1204–1571). 4 vols. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 114, 127, 161, 162. Philadelphia, 1976–1984.Google Scholar
Taliadoros, Jason. Law and Theology in Twelfth-Century England: The Works of Master Vacarius (c. 1115/1120-c. 1200). Disputatio 10. Turnhout, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliadoros, Jason. “Synthesizing the Legal and Theological Thought of Master Vacarius.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Kanonistische Abteilung 95 (2009): 4877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallon, Alain. La France et le Concile de Trent (1518–1563). Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome, no. 295. Rome, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Norman. “Pastoral Care: The Fourth Lateran Council of 1215.” In Evans, History of Pastoral Care, 112–25.Google Scholar
Tejero, Eloy. El matrimonio, misterio y signo: Siglos XIV ad XVI. Pamplona, 1971. [Third volume in the series, El matrimonio, misterio y signo.]Google Scholar
Telle, Emile V. Érasme de Rotterdam et le septième sacrament. Geneva, 1954.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J. “The Good Samaritan (Lk 10:29–37) in Augustine’s Exegesis.” In Van Fleteren and Schnaubelt, Augustine: Biblical Exegete, 347–57.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J. “William of Auvergne on Philosophy as divinalis and sapientialis.” In Aertsen and Speer, Was ist Philosophie in Mittelalter? 475–81.Google Scholar
Thibodeaux, Jennifer D. “The Defense of Clerical Marriage: Religious Identity and Masculinity in the Writings of Anglo-Norman Clerics.” In Cullum and Lewis, Religious Men and Masculine Identity in the Middle Ages, 46–63.Google Scholar
Thomas, Joseph A. C. Textbook of Roman Law. New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Thompson, Bard. Humanists and Reformers: A History of the Renaissance and Reformation. Grand Rapids, 2007.Google Scholar
Thompson, Steven. “Was Ancient Rome a Dead Wives Society? What Did the Roman Paterfamilias Get Away With?Journal of Family History 31.1 (2006): 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Kenneth John. “A Comparison of the Consultations of Marsilius of Padua and William of Ockham Relating to the Tyrolese Marriage of 1341–1342.” Archivum Franciscan Historicum 63 (1970): 343.Google Scholar
Thurston, Herbert. “Marriage, Ritual of.” Catholic Encyclopedia 9:703–09.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, vol 1: The Person and His Work. Trans. Royal, Robert. Washington, D.C., 1996. Revised edition, 2005.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. “Christology in the Quodlibets of Guerric of Saint-Quentin: A Precursor of Thomas Aquinas?” In Ginther and Still, Essays in Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toubert, Pierre. “La théorie de mariage chez les moralistes carolingiens.” In Il matrimonio nella società altomedievale, 1:233–82 (followed by discussion, 283–85).Google Scholar
Toubert, Pierre. “L’institution du mariage chrétien, de l’antiquité tardive à l’an mil.” In Morfologie sociali e culturali in Europa fra tarda antichità e alto medioevo, vol. 1 (Spoleto, 1998), 503–49.Google Scholar
Tranvik, Mark D.Luther on Baptism.” Lutheran Quarterly 13 (1999): 7590. [Repr. in Wengert, Harvesting Martin Luther’s Reflections, 23–37.]Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. “Consent to Roman Marriage: Some Aspects of Law and Reality.” Classical Views/Echos du monde classique, n.s. 26 (1982): 3444.Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. “Digna condicio: Betrothals in the Roman Upper Class.” Echos du monde classique/Classical Views 27, n.s. 3 (1984): 419–51.Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. “Divorce Roman Style: How Easy and How Frequent Was It?” In Rawson, Marriage, Divorce and Children in Ancient Rome, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. “Marriage and Family in Roman Society.” In Campbell, Marriage and Family, 132–82.Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. “Putting the Bride to Bed.” Echos du monde classique/Classic Views 38 (1994): 311–31.Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. “Roman Marriage.” In Grant and Kitzinger, Civilization of the Ancient Mediterranean, 3:1343–54.Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. Roman Marriage: Iusti coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevett, Christine. Montanism: Gender, Authority and the New Prophecy. Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigg, Jonathan D. Baptism in the Theology of Martin Luther. Leiden, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Denys. Eros and Allegory: Medieval Exegesis of the Song of Songs. Kalamazoo, 1995.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter. The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages: A Study in the Ideological Relation of Clerical to Lay Power. 3rd edition. London, 1970.Google Scholar
Urbanik, Jakub. “A Broken Marriage Promise and Justinian as a Lover of Chastity. On Novela 74 and P. Cair. Masp. I 67092 (553).” Journal of Juristic Papyrology 41 (2011): 123–51.Google Scholar
Valois, Noël. Guillaume d’Auvergne, Évêque de Paris (1228–1249) sa vie et ses ouvrages Paris, 1880.Google Scholar
Van Caenegem, Rooul C. English Lawsuits from William I to Richard I. 2 vols. Selden Society Publications 106–107. London, 1990, 1991.Google Scholar
Van den Eynde, Damien. Les définitions des sacrements pendant la première période de la théologie scolastique (1050–1240). Rome and Louvain, 1950.Google Scholar
Van den Eynde, Damien. “Stephen Langton and Hugh of St. Cher on the Causality of the Sacraments.” Franciscan Studies 11.3–4 (1951): 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Eynde, Damien. “The Theory of the Composition of the Sacraments in Early Scholasticism (1125–1240).” Franciscan Studies 11.1 (1951): 120, 117–44; 12.1 (1952): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Poel, Mark. Cornelius Agrippa: The Humanist Theologian and His Declamations. Leiden, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Poel, Mark. “Erasmus, Rhetoric and Theology: The Encomium matrimonii.” In Sacré and Tournoy, Myricae, 207–27.Google Scholar
Van Fleteren, Frederick and Schnaubelt, Joseph C. (eds.). Augustine: Biblical Exegete. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Van Roo, William A. Grace and Original Justice according to St. Thomas. Analecta Gregoriana cura Pontificiae Universitatis Gregorianae 75. Series Facultatis Theologicae, A.13. Rome, 1955.Google Scholar
VanDrunen, David. N. Natural Law and the Two Kingdoms: A Study in the Development of Reformed Social Thought. Emory University Studies in Law and Religion. Grand Rapids, 2010.Google Scholar
Verbraken, Pierre-Patrick. “Les fragments conservés de sermons perdus de saint Augustin.” Revue Bénédictine 84.3–4 (1974): 245–70,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vereecke, L.Mariage et sexualité au déclin du moyen âge.” La vie spirituelle, supp. 57 (1961): 199225.Google Scholar
Verlinden, Charles. “Le ‘mariage’ des esclaves.” In Il matrimonio nella società altomedievale, 2:569–93.Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul. “La famille et l’amour sous le haut-empire Romain.” Annales 33 (1978): 3563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villers, Robert. Rome et le droit privé. Paris, 1977.Google Scholar
Viscuso, Patrick Demetrios. A Byzantine Theology of Marriage: The Syntagma kata stoicheion of Matthew Blastares. Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America. Washington, D.C., 1989.Google Scholar
Vleeschouwers-Van Melkebeek, Monique. “Classical Canon Law on Marriage. The Making and Breaking of Households.” In Carlier and Soens, The Household in Late Medieval Cities, 15–23.Google Scholar
Vliet, A. H. van and Breed, C. G.. Marriage and Canon Law: A Concise and Complete Account. London, 1964.Google Scholar
Vogel, Cyrille. “Le rôle du liturge dans la formation du lien conjugal.” RDC 30 (1980): 727.Google Scholar
Vogel, Cyrille. “Les rites de la célébration du mariage. Leur signification dans la formation du lien durant le haut moyen âge.” In Il matrimonio nella società altomedievale, 1:397465 (followed by discussion, 467–72).Google Scholar
Vogt, Helle. The Function of Kinship in Medieval Nordic Legislation. Leiden, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volterra, Edoardo. La conception du mariage d’après les juristes romains. Padua, 1940.Google Scholar
Volterra, Edoardo. “Iniustum matrimonium.” In Studi in onore di Gaetano Scherillo (Milan: Cisalpino-La Goliardica, 1972, 3 vols), vol. 2, 441–70.Google Scholar
Von Hörmann, Walther. Quasiaffinität. Rechtshistorische Untersuchungen zu den Affinitätswirkungen der Verlöbnisses nach westlichem und kirchlichem Rechte. 2 vols. Innsbruch, 1906.Google Scholar
Wack, Mary Francis. “The Measure of Pleasure: Peter of Spain on Men, Women, and Lovesickness.” Viator 17 (1986): 174–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waelkens, Laurent L. J. M. “Medieval Family and Marriage Law: From Actions of Status to Legal Doctrine.” In Cairns and Plessis, The Creation of the Ius Commune, 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, Francis X. The Matrimonial Impediments of Consanguinity and Affinity: An Historical Synopsis and Commentary. Dissertation. Catholic University of America Canon Law Studies 90. Washington, D.C., 1934.Google Scholar
Walther-Holtzmann-Kartei: Regesta decretalium saeculi XII. Stephan Kuttner Institute of Medieval Canon Law. URL: www.kuttner-institute.jura.uni-muenchen.de/holtzmann_formular.htm (accessed November 14, 2013).Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. The Law of Persons in the Later Roman Republic. Oxford, 1967.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. “The Evolution of Law: The Roman System of Contracts.” Law and History Review 2 (1984): 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Alan. Legal Origins and Legal Change. London, 1991.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. Rome of the XII Tables: Persons and Property. Princeton, 1975.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. “Usu, farre(o), coemptione.” Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris 29 (1963): 337–38. [Repr. in Watson, Legal Origins and Legal Change, 9–10.]Google Scholar
Watt, J. A. “Spiritual and Temporal Powers.” In Burns, Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, 367–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, F. Ellen and Laporte, Jean. “Augustine and Women: Relationships and Teachings.” Augustinian Studies 12 (1981): 115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Hubert P. “The Glossa in IV libros Sententiarum by Alexander of Hales.” In Rosemann, Medieval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, 2:79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, John C.Gratian and the School of Laon.” Traditio 64 (2009): 279322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, John C.The Sentence Collection Deus non habet initium vel terminum and Its Reworking, Deus itaque summe atque ineffabiliter bonus.” Mediaeval Studies 73 (2011): 1118.Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. Die Glossen zum Dekret Gratians: Studien zu den frühen Glossen und Glossenkompositionen. 2 vols. Studia Gratiana 2526. Rome, 1991.Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. Liebe und Ehe im Mittelalter. Goldbach, 1993.Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. Die Naturrechtslehre des Legisten und Dekretisten von Irnerius bis Accursius und Gratian bis Johannes Teutonicus. Münchener theologische Studien III: Kanonistische Abteilung, Bd. 26. München, 1967.Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf “Die Dekretabbreviatio ‘Quonium egestas’ under ihre Glossen.” In Aymans et al., Fides et ius, 249–65.Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. “Die Glossen des Cardinalis (Magister Hucbald?) zum Dekret Gratians, besonders zu C.27 q.2.” BMCL 3 (1973): 73–95.Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. “Kanonistische Ehetraktate aus dem 12. Jahrhundert.” In Kuttner, Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Medieval Canon Law, 59–79. [Repr. in Weigand, Liebe und Ehe im Mittelalte, 37*–57*.]Google Scholar
Weigand, Rudolf. “The Transmontane Decretists.” In Hartmann and Pennington, History of Medieval Canon Law, 174–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A. (ed.). Albertus Magnus and the Sciences. Studies and Texts, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. Toronto, 1980.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A.. “The Life and Works of St. Albert the Great.” In Weisheipl, Albertus Magnus and the Sciences, 13–51.Google Scholar
Weisweiler, Henri. Maître Simon et son groupe De sacramentis. Textes inédits. Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, Études et Documents, 17. Louvain, 1937.Google Scholar
Weisweiler, Henri. Das Schrifttum der Schule Anselms von Laon und Wilhelms von Champeaux in deutschen Bibliotheken. BGPhMA 33.1–2. Münster, 1936.Google Scholar
Weisweiler, Henri. “L’École d’Anselme de Laon de de Guillaume de Champeaux. Noveaux Documents.” RThAM 4 (1932): 237–69, 371–91.Google Scholar
Weisweiler, Henri. “La Summa sententiarum, source de Pierre Lombard.” RThAM 6 (1934): 143–83.Google Scholar
Weisweiler, Henri. “Le recueil des sentences ‘Deus de cuius principio et fine tacetur’ et son remaniement.” RThAM 5 (1933): 245–74.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Lenore J. The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law. New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Wemple, Suzanne F. Women in Frankish Society: Marriage and the Cloister, 500–900. Philadelphia, 1981.Google Scholar
Wemple, Suzanne F. “Consent and Dissent to Sexual Intercourse in Germanic Societies from the Fifth to the Tenth Century.” In Laiou, Consent and Coercion, 227–243.Google Scholar
Wengert, Timothy J. (ed.). Harvesting Martin Luther’s Reflections on Theology, Ethics, and the Church. Grand Rapids, 2004.Google Scholar
Wengert, Timothy J. The Pastoral Luther: Essays on Martin Luther’s Practical Theology. Grand Rapids, 2009.Google Scholar
Werckmeister, Jean. “L’apparition de la doctrine due mariage contrat dans le droit canonique due 12e siècle.” RDC 53.1 (2003): 525.Google Scholar
Werckmeister, Jean. “Le deux version du De matrimonio de Gratien.” RDC 48.2 (1988): 301–16.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Raymond. Old Babylonian Marriage Law. Archiv für Orientforschung 23. Horn, Austria, 1988.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Robert and Hareven, Tamara K.. Family and Sexuality in French History. Philadelphia, 1980.Google Scholar
Whittaker, C. W. and Grabar, Oleg. “Slavery.” In Bowerstock et al., Late Antiquity, pp. 698–700.Google Scholar
Williams, George H. The Radical Reformation. 3rd edition. Kirksville, Missouri, 1992.Google Scholar
Williams, John R.The Cathedral School of Reims in the Time of Master Alberic, 1118–1136.” Traditio 20 (1964): 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Thomas (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas. “Introduction: The Life and Works of John Duns the Scot.” In Williams, Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willsch, Alois. Das Verständnis der Ehe im Enchiridion des Johannes Gropper. Ein Beitrag Zum Eheverständnis der vortridentinischen katholischen Kontroverstheologie des 16. Jahrhunderts. St. Ottilien, 1990.Google Scholar
Wilmart, A.Une rédaction française des Sentences dites d’Anselme de Laon.” RThAM 11 (1939): 119–44.Google Scholar
Wilson, Water T. The Sentences of Sextus. Atlanta, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Adrian and Wilson, Joyce Lancaster. A Medieval Mirror: Speculum humanae salvationis, 1324–1500. Berkeley, 1984.Google Scholar
Wilson, Katherina M. and Makowski, Elizabeth M.. Wykked Wyves and the Woes of Marriage: Misogamous Literature from Juvenal to Chaucer. Albany, 1990.Google Scholar
Winn, Mary Beth. Anthoine Vérar: Parisian Publisher, 1485–1512: Prologues, Poems and Presentations. Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance, no. 313. Geneva, 1997.Google Scholar
Winroth, Anders. The Making of Gratian’s Decretum. Cambridge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winroth, Anders. “Marital Consent in Gratian’s Decretum.” In Brett and Cushing (eds.), Readers, Texts and Compilers, 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winroth, Anders. “Neither Slave nor Free: Theology and Law in Gratian’s Thoughts on the Definition of Marriage and Unfree Persons.” In Müller and Sommar, Medieval Church Law and the Origins of the Western Legal Tradition, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, John Jr. God’s Joust, God’s Justice: Law and Religion in the Western Tradition. Grand Rapids, 2006.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr. Law and Protestantism: The Legal Teachings of the Lutheran Reformation. Cambridge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, John Jr.The Goods and Goals of Marriage.” In Notre Dame Law Review 76.3 (2001): 10191071.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr.The Reformation of Marriage Law in Martin Luther’s Germany: Its Significance Then and Now.” Journal of Law and Religion 4.2 (1986): 293351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, John Jr. From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition. Louisville, 1997.Google Scholar
Wolff, Hans J. Written and Unwritten Marriages in Hellenistic and Postclassical Law. Haverford, Pennsylvania, 1939.Google Scholar
Wolff, Hans J.Doctrinal Trends in Postclassical Roman Marriage Law.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, romanistiche Abteilung 67 (1950): 261319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Diana (ed.). The Church and Sovereignty, c.590–1918: Essays in Honour of Michael Wilks. Ecclesiastical History Society, Studies in Church History, Subsidia 9. Oxford, 1991Google Scholar
Worby, Sam. Law and Kinship in Thirteenth-Century England. Woodbridge, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaccaria, Raffaella. “Delfini, Giovanni Antonio.” In Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani, vol. 30 (Rome, 1988), 546–50.Google Scholar
Zechiel-Eckes, Klaus. “Auf Pseudoisidors Spur, oder: Versuch einen dichten Schleier zu lüften.” In Hartmann and Schmitz, Fortschritt durch Fälschungen? 1–28.Google Scholar
Zeimentz, Hans. Ehe nach der Lehre der Frühscholastik. Düsseldorf, 1973.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Reinhard. “Stipulatio (stipulation).” Oxford Classical Dictionary. 4th edition, 2012.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Philip L. Reynolds, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: How Marriage Became One of the Sacraments
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316536445.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Philip L. Reynolds, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: How Marriage Became One of the Sacraments
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316536445.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Philip L. Reynolds, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: How Marriage Became One of the Sacraments
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316536445.022
Available formats
×