Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-lpd2x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:25:04.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The significance of cultural differences for human rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Cindy Holder
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, British Columbia
David Reidy
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee
Get access

Summary

Introduction: whether culture represents a challenge to human rights

In the twentieth century, international human rights standards emerged in the global arena. There was tremendous excitement about their potential to protect individuals from atrocities and to help guarantee a decent quality of life for all. From the beginning there were questions about the philosophical foundations of human rights. In particular, there has been considerable attention paid to the challenge culture poses to the validity of international human rights. Because human rights notions were seen as being derived from the Enlightenment tradition, this seemed to imply that human rights are “Western” or “Eurocentric” (Pannikkar 1982). If, in fact, they did reflect a cultural bias, that might undermine the legitimacy of this new regime.

During the drafting of the initial human rights instruments collectively known as “the International Bill of Rights,” delegates came together from diverse countries. Insofar as there was representation from different parts of the world at the meetings, one might have thought this would mitigate the impact of such a critique. Nevertheless, the challenge from cultural relativism remained.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Rights
The Hard Questions
, pp. 79 - 99
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abusharaf, Rogaia Mustafa, ed. 2006. Female Circumcision. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRef
Aggarwal, Archana. 2008. Crimes of Honor: An International Human Rights Perspective on Violence Against Women in South Asia. Doctoral dissertation, Political Science, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Anderson, David, Beckerleg, Susan, Hailu, Degol and Klein, Axel. 2007. The Khat Controversy: Stimulating the Debate on Drugs. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . 2011. “Against the Cut: The ‘Intactivist’ Movement Takes on the Oldest Surgery Known to Man.” The Economist 399:8734 (May 21, 2011), 34.Google Scholar
An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1992. “Toward a Cross-Cultural Approach to Defining International Standards of Human Rights.” In Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im, ed., Human Rights in Cross Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirne, Piers. 1983. “Cultural Relativism and Comparative Criminology.” Contemporary Crises 7, 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, David. 1998. “Corporal Punishment.” Social Theory and Practice 24, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannold, Leslie. 2006. “The Ethics of Neonatal Male Circumcision: Helping Parents to Decide.” In Benatar, David, ed., Cutting to the Core: Exploring the Ethics of Contested Surgeries. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
Coleman, Doriane. 1998. “The Seattle Compromise: Multicultural Sensitivity, and Americanization.” Duke Law Journal 47, 717–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Doriane and Dodge, Kenneth A., eds. 2010. Special Issue on Corporal Punishment of Children Law and Contemporary Problems 73, 1–341.
Committee on the Rights of the Child. 2007. General Comment No. 8. UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/ (March 2, 2007).
Committee on the Rights of the Child. 2011. General Comment No. 13. UN Doc CRC/C/GC/13 (April 18, 2011).
Cowan, Jane, Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte and Wilson, Richard A., eds. 2001. Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Crossette, Barbara. 1998. “Mutilation Seen as Risk for the Girls of Immigrants.” New York Times, March 23.Google Scholar
DeLaet, Debra L. 2009. “Framing Male Circumcision as a Human Rights Issue? Contributions to the Debate over the Universality of Human Rights.” Journal of Human Rights 8, 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugger, Celia. 1996. “New Law Bans Genital Cutting in the United States: Violators Could Face Five Years in Prison.” New York Times, October 12, 1 and 6.Google Scholar
Durrant, Joan E., Trocme, Nico, Fallon, Barbara, Milne, Cheryl and Black, Tara. 2009. “Protection of Children from Physical Maltreatment in Canada: An Evaluation of the Supreme Court’s Definition of Reasonable Force.” Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 18:1, 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, Melissa. 2012a. “In Germany, Ruling Over Circumcision Sows Anxiety and Confusion.” New York Times, July 13.Google Scholar
Eddy, Melissa 2012b. “Germany: Circumcision Ruling Opposed.” New York Times, July 13.Google Scholar
Favazza, Armando R. 1996. Bodies Under Siege: Self-mutilation and Body Modification in Culture and Psychiatry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fontes, Lisa A. 2005. Child Abuse and Culture: Working with Diverse Families. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Marie and Thomson, Michael. 2006. “Short Changed? The Law and Ethics of Male Circumcision.” In Michael Freeman, ed., Children’s Health and Children’s Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 161–181.Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco and Scheinin, Martin, eds. 2008. Cultural Human Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Geertz, Clifford. 1984. “Anti-Anti Relativism.” American Anthropologist 86, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour v. North Shore Taxi and others. 2006. BCHRT 629, October 31, 2006, File 3775.
Gruenbaum, Ellen. 2001. The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunning, Isabelle R. 2002. “Female Genital Surgeries: Eradication Measures at the Western Local Level—A Cautionary Tale.” In Stanlie M. James and Claire C. Robertson, eds., Genital Cutting and Transnational Sisterhood: Disputing U.S. Polemics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 114–125.Google Scholar
Hatch, Elvin. 1983. Culture and Morality: The Relativity of Values in Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Rhoda. 1993. “Cultural Relativism as Cultural Absolutism.” Human Rights Quarterly 15, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innocenti, . 2005. Changing a Harmful Social Convention: Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Rome: UNICEF.Google Scholar
Jones, Wanda, Smith, Jack, KiekeJr., Burney and Wilcox, Lynne. 1997. “Female Genital Mutilation/Female Circumcision: Who is at Risk in the United States?Public Health Reports 112, 368–377.Google Scholar
Lal, Vinay. 1994. “The Flogging of Michael Fay.” Economic and Political Weekly 29 (June 4), 1386–1388.Google Scholar
Lane, Sandra D. and Rubinstein, Robert A. 1996. “Judging the Other: Responding to Traditional Female Genital Surgeries.” Hastings Center Report, May–June, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, Sandra, Mikhail, Blanche I., Reizian, Alice, Courtright, Paul, Marx, Rani and Dawson, Chandler R. 1993. “Sociocultural Aspects of Blindness in an Egyptian Delta Hamlet: Visual Impairment vs. Visual Disability.” Medical Anthropology 15, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manglapus, Raul S. 1978. “Human Rights Are Not a Western Discovery.” Worldview 4, 4–6.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean F. 2009. “Article 7: Persons Without the Capacity to Consent.” In Henk A.M.J. ten Have and Michele S. Jean, eds., The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Background, Principles and Application. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 139–159.Google Scholar
Medina, Jennifer. 2011. “Efforts to Ban Circumcision Gain Traction in California.” New York Times, June 5, 18.Google Scholar
Mohammed, Mima and Mendoza, Moises. 2006. “Court Orders a Currency Redesign to Aid the Blind.” Los Angeles Times, November 6, A19.Google Scholar
Niec, Halina, ed. 1998. Cultural Rights and Wrongs. Paris: UNESCO & Institute of Art and Law.
Obiora, L. Amede. 1997. “Bridges and Barricades: Rethinking Polemics and Intransigence in the Campaign against Female Circumcision.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 47, 275–378.Google Scholar
Pannikkar, Raimundo. 1982. “Is the Notion of Human Rights a Western Concept?Diogenes 120, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paz, Octavio. 1961. “The Sons of La Malinche.” In The Labyrinth of Solitude: Life and Thought in Mexico, translated by Kemp, Lysander. New York: Grove Press, pp. 65–89.Google Scholar
People v. Weili Kao. 2005. “Points and Authorities, Re: Cultural Expert.” Super. Ct. NO. 04F04427 (Cal. Super. Ct. Aug. 8 2005).
Redfield, Robert. 1962. The Primitive World and Its Transformations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes. 1988. “Relativism and the Search for Human Rights.”American Anthropology 90, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 1990. International Human Rights: Universalism Versus Relativism. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 1994. “Is the Cultural Defense Detrimental to the Health of Children?Law and Anthropology 7, 27–106.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 1997. “Who’s Afraid of the CRC: Objections to the Convention on the Rights of the Child.” ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 3:2, 629–640.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2002. “Cultural Rights.” In Baltes, Paul and Smelser, Neil, eds., International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2003. “Cross-Cultural Perceptions of Disability: Policy Implications of Divergent Views.” In Stan Herr, Lawrence Gostin, and Harold Koh, eds., The Human Rights of People with Intellectual Disabilities: Different but Equal. Oxford University Press, pp. 59–81.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2004. The Cultural Defense. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2005. “The Use and Abuse of the Cultural Defense.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 20:1, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2010. “Corporal Punishment and the Cultural Defense.” Law and Contemporary Problems 73: 253–279.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes and Valladeres, Rene. 2009. “The Importance of Culture for the Justice System.” Judicature 92, 193–201.Google Scholar
Reuters, . 2012. Anon. “Angela Merkel Intervenes over Court Ban on Circumcision of Young Boys.” Guardian, July 13.Google Scholar
Sabatello, Maya. 2009. Children’s Bioethics: The International Biopolitical Discourse on Harmful Traditional Practices and the Right of the Child to Cultural Identity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, David. 2008. “Appeals Court Rules U.S. Currency is Discriminating against the Blind.” Los Angeles Times, May 21, A12.Google Scholar
Savane, Marie-Angelique. 1979. “Why We Are Against the International Campaign.” International Child Welfare Review 40, 37 and 39.Google Scholar
Skovron, Sandra Evans, Scott, Joseph E. and Rao, Kamalakara Rao. 1987. “Cross-cultural Perceptions of Offense Severity: The United States, India, and Kuwait.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 11, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souryal, Sam and Potts, Dennis W. 1994. “The Penalty of Hand Amputation for Theft in Islamic Justice.” Journal of Criminal Justice 22, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Elsa. 2007. Cultural Rights in International Law: Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Beyond. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, William G. 1911. Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals. Boston: Ginn, Atheneum.Google Scholar
Tahzib, Bahiyyih G. 1996. Freedom of Religion or Belief: Ensuring Effective International Legal Protection. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Toubia, Nahid. 1993. “Testimony on Female Genital Mutilation of Dr. Nahid Toubia,” House of Representatives, Committee on Foreign Affairs’ subcommittee on International Security, International Organizations, and Human Rights, September 28, 1993.
Trujillo-Garcia v. Rowland. 1992. US District Court, Northern District of California (1993), US Court of the Appeals, 9th Circuit.
Westermarck, Edward. 1932. Ethical Relativity. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard A., ed. 1997. Human Rights, Culture & Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.
Wong, David. 1984. Moral Relativity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×