Aalto, Pami (2011). The human subject in international studies: An outline for interdisciplinary research programmes. In Aalto, Pami, Harle, Vilho, and Moisio, Sami, eds., International Studies. London; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 178–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2011). Norm subsidiarity and regional orders. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 95–123.Google Scholar

Ackelsberg, Martha A. (1992). Feminist analyses of public policy. Comparative Politics, 24(4), 477–493.Google Scholar

Ackelsberg, Martha A., and Diamond, Irene (1987). Gender and political life: New directions in political science. In Hess, Beth B., and Ferree, Myra M., eds., Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research. Newbury Park: SAGE, 504–525.Google Scholar

Ackermann, Spencer (2011). Rare Photographs Show Ground Zero of the Drone War. Wired. www.wired.com/2011/12/photos-pakistan-drone-war/.Google Scholar

Adediran, Bolarinwa (2017). Implementing R2P: Towards a regional solution? Global Responsibility to Protect, 9(4), 459–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Emanuel (2013). Constructivism in international relations: Sources, contributions, and debates. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., eds., Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. London: SAGE , 112–144.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Pouliot, Vincent (2014). Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 889–911.Google Scholar

African Union Assembly (2008). Decision on the Situation in Kenya Following the Presidential Election of 27 December 2007. (Assembly/AU/Dec.187[X]). https://au.int/sites/default/files/decisions/9562-assembly_en_31_january_2_february_2008_auc_tenth_ordinary_session_decisions_and_declarations.pdf.Google Scholar

African Union Assembly (2013). Twenty-First Ordinary Session. https://au.int/sites/default/files/decisions/9654-assembly_au_dec_474-489_xxi_e.pdf.Google Scholar

African Union Peace and Security Council (2011). Communique of the 265th Meeting of the Peace and Security Council. (PSC/PR/COMM.2[CCLXV]). www.peaceau.org/uploads/communique-libya-eng.pdf.Google Scholar

Africanews (2021). Interim Government Assumes Power in Libya. www.africanews.com/2021/03/16/interim-government-assumes-power-in-libya/.Google Scholar

Agerberg, Mattias, and Kreft, Anne-Kathrin (2020). Gendered conflict, gendered outcomes: The politicization of sexual violence and quota adoption. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(2–3), 290–317.Google Scholar

Ainley, Kirsten (2008). Individual agency and responsibility for atrocity. In Renée, Jeffery, ed., Confronting Evil in International Relations: Ethical Responses to Problems of Moral Agency. Vol 1. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 37–70.Google Scholar

Ainley, Kirsten (2011). Excesses of responsibility: The limits of law and the possibilities of politics. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(4), 407–431.Google Scholar

Ainley, Kirsten (2015). The Responsibility to Protect and the International Criminal Court: Counteracting the crisis. International Affairs, 91(1), 37–54.Google Scholar

Aistrope, Tim, Gifkins, Jess, and Taylor, N. A. J. (2018). The Responsibility to Protect and the question of attribution. Global Change, Peace & Security, 30(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Akbarzadeh, Shahram, and Saba, Arif (2019). UN paralysis over Syria: The responsibility to protect or regime change? International Politics, 56(4), 536–550.Google Scholar

Albania; Andorra; Australia; Austria; Belgium; Botswana; Bulgaria; Canada; Central African Republic; Chile; Côte d’Ivoire; Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; France; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Iceland; Ireland; Italy; Japan; Jordan; Latvia; Libya; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Malta; Marshall Islands; Mexico; Monaco; Montenegro; Netherlands; New Zealand; Norway; Panama; Poland; Portugal; Qatar; Republic of Korea; Republic of Moldova; Romania; Samoa; San Marino; Saudi Arabia; Senegal; Serbia; Seychelles; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; Turkey; Ukraine; United Arab Emirates; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; United States of America (2014). Draft Resolution. (S/2014/348). www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_2014_348.pdf.Google Scholar

Alcoff, Linda (1987). Justifying feminist social science. Hypatia, 2(3), 107–120.Google Scholar

Alcoff, Linda (1988). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs, 13(3), 405–436.Google Scholar

Aljazeera (2014). Mixed Reactions to ICC Decision on Kenyatta. www.aljazeera.com/news/2014/12/6/mixed-reactions-to-icc-decision-on-kenyatta.Google Scholar

Aljazeera (2021). Libya Talks Make Progress towards New Temporary Government: UN. www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/1/17/libya-talks-make-progress-towards-new-temporary-government-un.Google Scholar

Allinson, Jamie (2015). The necropolitics of drones. International Political Sociology, 9(2), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allott, Philip (1992). Reconstituting humanity—New international law. European Journal of International Law, 3(2), 219–252.Google Scholar

Almagro, Maria M. de (2018). Lost boomerangs, the rebound effect and transnational advocacy networks: A discursive approach to norm diffusion. Review of International Studies, 44(4), 672–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J. (2020). Comprehending global governance: International regime complexity vs. Global constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 9(2), 413–423.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspective on Politics, 7(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altman, Andrew (2012). Introduction. In Finkelstein, Claire, Ohlin, Jens D., and Altman, Andrew, eds., Targeted Killing: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–27.Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E. (2008). The schizophrenia of R2P. In MacDonald, Euan, and Alston, Philip, eds., Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 275–284.Google Scholar

Alvesson, Mats, and Sandberg, Jörgen (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271.Google Scholar

Alvesson, Mats, and Sandberg, Jörgen (2013). Constructing Research Questions. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Ambos, Kai (2013). Expanding the focus of the ‘African criminal court’. In Schabas, William A., McDermott, Yvonne, and Hayes, Niamh, eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives. Surrey; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 499–529.Google Scholar

Amnesty International (2013). ‘Will I Be Next?’ US Drone Strikes in Pakistan. https://www.amnestyusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/asa330132013en.pdf.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kenneth, and Waxman, Matthew C. (2013). Law and Ethics for Autonomous Weapon Systems: Why a Ban Won’t Work and How the Laws of War Can. (Research Paper No. 2013-11). https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2804&context=faculty_scholarship.Google Scholar

Aning, Kwesi, and Edu-Afful, Fiifi (2016). African agency in R2P: Interventions by African Union and ECOWAS in Mali, Cote d’Ivoire, and Libya. International Studies Review, 18(1), 120–133.Google Scholar

Annan, Kofi (1999). Two concepts of sovereignty. The Economist, 18 September 1999.Google Scholar

Arab League (2011). The Outcome of the Council of the League of Arab States Meeting at the Ministerial Level in Its Extraordinary Session on the Implications of the Current Events in Libya and the Arab Position. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/Arab%20League%20Ministerial%20level%20statement%2012%20march%202011%20-%20english%281%29.pdf.Google Scholar

Arbour, Louise (2008). The Responsibility to Protect as a duty of care in international law and practice. Review of International Studies, 34(3), 445–458.Google Scholar

Arbour, Louise (2013). Entmachtet die Großmächte. Die ZEIT, 14 November 2013.Google Scholar

Archambault, Emil (2018). Review article: Targeted killing, technologies of violence, and society. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 47(1), 142–152.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah (1969 [1958]). The Origins of Totalitarianism. 2nd enlarged ed. Cleveland; New York: Meridian.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah (1990 [1963]). On Revolution. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah (1998 [1958]). The Human Condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ashley, Richard K. (1984). The poverty of neorealism. International Organization, 38(2), 225–286.Google Scholar

Aslam, Wali, and Rauxloh, Regina (2015). Conclusions. In Aaronson, Mike, Aslam, Wali, Dyson, Tom, and Rauxloh, Regina, eds., Precision Strike Warfare and International Intervention. Oxon: Routledge, 225–233.Google Scholar

Auchter, Jessica (2016). Paying attention to dead bodies: The future of security studies? Journal of Global Security Studies, 1(1), 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aukerman, Miriam J. (2002). Extraordinary evil, ordinary crime: A framework for understanding transitional justice. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15, 39–96.Google Scholar

Aust, Helmut P. (2017). ‘The system only dreams in total darkness’: The future of human rights law in the light of algorithmic authority. German Yearbook of International Law, 60, 1–15.Google Scholar

Babbitt, Eileen F. (2017). Responsibility to Protect: Time to reassess. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 9(3), 431–435.Google Scholar

Baggiarini, Bianca (2015). Drone warfare and the limits of sacrifice. Journal of International Political Theory, 11(1), 128–144.Google Scholar

Bahrain; Colombia; Egypt; France; Germany; Jordan; Kuwait; Libya; Morocco; Oman; Portugal; Qatar; Saudi Arabia; Togo; Tunisia; Turkey; United Arab Emirates; United Kingdom and United States of America (2012). Draft Resolution. (S/2012/77). www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Syria%20S2012%2077.pdf.Google Scholar

Bähring, Jill (2017). Individual Redress and State Responsibility the Law and Politics of Compensation Payments and Their Application to Drone Strike Victims. Master Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Bain, William (2010). Responsibility and obligation in the ‘Responsibility to Protect’. Review of International Studies, 36(Special Issue S1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ban, Ki-Moon (2009). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. (A/63/677). www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/special/docs/17thsession/SG_reportA_63_677_en.pdf.Google Scholar

Banka, Andris, and Quinn, Adam (2018). Killing norms softly: US targeted killing, quasi-secrecy and the assassination ban. Security Studies, 27(4), 665–703.Google Scholar

Baranovsky, Vladimir, and Mateiko, Anatoly (2016). Responsibility to Protect: Russia’s approaches. The International Spectator, 51(2), 49–69.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael N. (2012). International paternalism and humanitarian governance. Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 1(3), 485–521.Google Scholar

Barrinha, Andre, and da Vinha, Luis (2015). Dealing with risk. In Aaronson, Mike, Aslam, Wali, Dyson, Tom, and Rauxloh, Regina, eds., Precision Strike Warfare and International Intervention. Oxon: Routledge, 14–32.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens (1995). A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

BBC (2010). Kenya Election Violence: ICC Names Suspects. www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-11996652.Google Scholar

BBC (2013). Syria Crisis: Russia and China Step up Warning over Strike.www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-23845800.Google Scholar

BBC (2014). Syria conflict: UN concerned over Homs detentions. www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-26131742.Google Scholar

Beier, J. Marshall (2021). ‘This changes things’: Children, targeting, and the making of precision. Cooperation and Conflict. Online First, 1–16.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan (2012). The dawn of biopolitical IR? International Studies Review, 14(4), 653–656.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2006). Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian intervention and the 2005 world summit. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(2), 143–169.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention. International Affairs, 84(4), 615–639.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2009). Responsibility to Protect—The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect—five years on. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(2), 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2011a). Global Politics and the Responsibility to Protect. Oxford; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2011b). Libya and The Responsibility to Protect: The exception and the norm. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(3), 263–269.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2014). The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of regime change. In Scheid, Don E., ed., The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 166–186.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2015). The Responsibility to Protect: A Defense. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2016). The humanisation of security? Towards an international human protection regime. European Journal of International Security, 1(1), 112–133.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (forthcoming). Syria Betrayed: Atrocities, War, and the Failure of International Diplomacy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J., and McLoughlin, Stephen (2018). Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J., and Reike, Ruben (2010). The Responsibility to Protect and international law. Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(3), 267–286.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla (2007). Twilight of sovereignty or the emergence of cosmopolitan norms? Rethinking citizenship in volatile times. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 19–36.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Medea (2013). Drone Warfare. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Bensouda, Fatou (2014). Gender justice and the ICC: Progress and reflections. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16(4), 538–542.Google Scholar

Berenskötter, Felix (2018). Deep theorizing in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 24(4), 814–840.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas (1967 [1966]). The Social Construction of Reality. First Anchor Books Edition. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha (2009). The authority of international law – Lifting the state veil. Sydney Law Review, 31(3), 343–380.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha (2010). Theorizing the sources of international law. In Besson, Samantha, and Tasioulas, John, eds., The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 163–185.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, and Tasioulas, John, eds. (2010). The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bhuta, Nehal, Beck, Susanne, Geiß, Robin, Liu, Hin-Yan, and Kreß, Claus, eds. (2016). Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biersteker, Thomas J., and Weber, Cynthia, eds. (1996). State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Birckenbach, Hanne-Magret (1991). Paradigmen der internationalen Politik: Eine Kritik aus der Perspektive feministischer Friedensforschung. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 2(8), 959–970.Google Scholar

Birdsall, Andrea (2018). Drone warfare in counterterrorism and normative change: US policy and the politics of international law. Global Society, 32(3), 241–262.Google Scholar

Birkenkötter, Hannah (2016). Ein Erfolgreicher Jahresabschluss? Zur Syrien-Resolution des UN-Sicherheitsrats. https://jungeunforschung.wordpress.com/2016/01/04/ein-erfolgreicher-jahresabschluss-zur-syrien-resolution-des-un-sicherheitsrats/.Google Scholar

Birkenkötter, Hannah (2020). International law as a common language across spheres of authority? Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 9(2), 318–342.Google Scholar

Birkenkötter, Hannah, and Kaya, Berkan (2022). The ICJ in an age of inter-legality: A survey of its case law in the new millennium. German Yearbook of International Law, 63(1), 421–450.Google Scholar

Birmingham, Peg (2003). Holes of oblivion: The banality of radical evil. Hypatia, 18, 80–113.Google Scholar

Bissonnette, Camille M. (2016). The definition of civilians in non-international armed conflicts. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 7(1), 129–155.Google Scholar

Blank, Laurie R. (2015). Targeted killing. In Johnson, James T., and Patterson, Eric D., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Military Ethics. Farnham: Ashgate, 231–243.Google Scholar

Blatter, Joachim K., Janning, Frank, and Wagemann, Claudius (2007). Qualitative Politikfeldanalyse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Bleiker, Roland, and Hutchison, Emma (2008). Fear no more: Emotions and world politics. Review of International Studies, 34(S1), 115–135.Google Scholar

Blum, Gabriella (2014). The individualization of war: From war to policing in the regulation of armed conflicts. In Austin, Sarat, Lawrence, Douglas, and Umphrey., Martha M., eds., Law and War. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 48–83.Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 29(1), 3–10.Google Scholar

Boateng, Oheneba A. (forthcoming). Africa’s Homegrown Humanitarianism: Regional Responses Versus Global Governance. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bode, Ingvild, and Huelss, Hendrik (2018). Autonomous weapons systems and changing norms in international relations. Review of International Studies, 44(3), 393–413.Google Scholar

Bogner, Alexander, Littig, Beate, and Menz, Wolfgang (2014). Interviews mit Experten: Eine Praxisorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar

Bogner, Alexander, and Wolfgang, Menz (2009). Das theoriegenerierende Experteninterview: Erkenntnisinteresse, Wissensformen, Interaktionen. 3rd ed. In Alexander, Bogner, Beate, Littig, and Wolfgang, Menz, eds., Experteninterviews. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 61–98.Google Scholar

Bonafé, Beatrice I. (2013). Coordinating concurrent legal orders in the prosecution of international crimes. Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 2(2), 316–344.Google Scholar

Bonds, Eric (2019). Humanitized violence: Targeted killings and civilian deaths in the US war against the Islamic State. Current Sociology, 67(3), 438–455.Google Scholar

Boone, Jon, and Kirchgaessner, Stephanie (2015). Pakistan Uses Hostage Killings to Underline Risk of US Drone Strikes. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/24/pakistan-us-hostage-killings-drone-strikes-weinstein-lo-porto.Google Scholar

Bousquet, Antoine J. (2018). The Eye of War: Military Perception from the Telescope to the Drone. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Bower, Adam (2019). Contesting the International Criminal Court: Bashir, Kenyatta, and the status of the nonimpunity norm in world politics. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 88–104.Google Scholar

Boyle, Michael J. (2013). The cost and consequences of drone warfare. International Affairs, 89(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Boyle, Michael J. (2015). The legal and ethical implications of drone warfare. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(2), 105–126.Google Scholar

Bradley, Megan (2019). Unresolved and unresolvable? Tensions in the refugee regime. Ethics & International Affairs, 33(1), 45–56.Google Scholar

Brennan, John O. (2012). The Efficacy and Ethics of U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy. www.wilsoncenter.org/event/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorism-strategy.Google Scholar

Brock, Lothar (1999). Normative Integration und kollektive Handlungskompetenz auf internationaler Ebene. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 6(2), 323–347.Google Scholar

Brock, Lothar (2013). Dilemmata des internationalen Schutzes von Menschen vor innerstaatlicher Gewalt. Ein Ausblick. In Christopher, Daase, and Julian, Junk, eds., Die Friedenswarte: Journal of International Peace and Organization, 88(1–2), 163–185.Google Scholar

Brockmeier, Sarah, Stuenkel, Oliver, and Tourinho, Marcos (2016). The impact of the Libya intervention debates on norms of protection. Global Society, 30(1), 113–133.Google Scholar

Brookman-Byrne, Max (2017). Drone use ‘outside areas of active hostilities’: An examination of the legal paradigms governing US covert remote strikes. Netherlands International Law Review, 64(1), 3–41.Google Scholar

Brooks, Rosa (2014). Drones, and the international rule of law. Ethics & International Affairs, 28(1), 83–103.Google Scholar

Brown, Anne M. (2002a). Human Rights and the Borders of Suffering. Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris (2002b). Sovereignty, Rights and Justice: International Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris (2009). Structural realism, classical realism and human nature. International Relations, 23(2), 257–270.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris, and Ainley, Kirsten (2009). Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Brown, Sarah (1988). Feminism, international theory, and international relations of gender inequality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 461–475.Google Scholar

Brühl, Jannis (2015). Recht und Ramstein. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 28 May 2015.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. (2010a). Legitimacy and Legality in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. (2010b). The Responsibility to Protect and the use of force: Building legality? Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(3), 191–212.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. (2014). The Rule of Law in an Agnostic World: The Prohibition on the Use of Force and Humanitarian Exceptions. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2547022.Google Scholar

Brunstetter, Daniel R., and Jimenez-Barcadi, Arturo (2015). Clashing over drones: The legal and normative gap between the united states and the human rights community. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(2), 176–198.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen (2003). Reforming the international law of humanitarian intervention. In Holzgrefe, Jeff L. and Keohane, Robert O., eds., Humanitarian Intervention: Ethic, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 130–173.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen (2010). The legitimacy of international law. In Besson, Samantha, and Tasioulas, John, eds., The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 79–96.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane, Robert O. (2015a). Toward a drone accountability regime. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(1), 15–37.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, and Keohane, Robert O. (2015b). Toward a drone accountability regime: A rejoinder. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(1), 67–70.Google Scholar

Buitelaar, Tom, and Hirschmann, Gisela (2021). Criminal accountability at what cost? Norm conflict, UN peace operations and the International Criminal Court. European Journal of International Relations, 27(2), 548–571.Google Scholar

Bumke, Christian (2009). Menschenbilder des Rechts. Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, 57, 125–148.Google Scholar

Bünte, Marco (2009). Myanmar und die Frage der externen Intervention: Von der „Responsibility to Protect” zum humanitären Dialog. Die Friedenswarte: Journal of International Peace and Organization, 84(1), 125–141.Google Scholar

Burchill, Scott (2009). Liberalism. In Scott, Burchill, Andrew, Linklater, Richard, Devetak, Jack, Donnelly, Terry, Nardin, Matthew, Paterson, Christian, Reus-Smit, and Jacqui, True, eds., Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 57–85.Google Scholar

Burger, Julian, and Kapron, Mary (2017). Drug policy and indigenous peoples. Health and Human Rights Journal, 19(1), 269–278.Google ScholarPubMed

Burke-White, William W. (2008). Implementing a policy of positive complementarity in the Rome system of justice. Criminal Law Forum, 19(1), 59–85.Google Scholar

Buss, Doris (2016). International criminal courts. In Steans, Jill, and Tepe-Belfrage, Daniela, eds., Handbook on Gender in World Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 162–170.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble. 2nd ed. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith (2004). Precarious Life. London; New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Hansen, Lene (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Byers, Michael, and Chesterman, Simon (2003). Changing the rules about the rules? Unilateral humanitarian intervention and the future of international law. In Holzgrefe, Jeff L. and Keohane, Robert O., eds., Humanitarian Intervention: Ethic, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177–203.Google Scholar

Byrne, Max (2016). Consent and the use of force: An examination of ‘intervention by invitation’ as a basis for US drone strikes in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 3(1), 97–125.Google Scholar

Cacciatori, Mattia (2018). When kings are criminals: Lessons from ICC prosecutions of African presidents. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12(3), 386–406.Google Scholar

Campbell, Kirsten (2013). The making of global legal cultures and international criminal law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 26(1), 155–172.Google Scholar

Cannon, Brendon J. (2020). What’s in it for us? Armed drone strikes and the security of Somalia’s federal government. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 31(4), 773–800.Google Scholar

Capasso, Matteo (2014). The Libyan drawers: ‘stateless society’, ‘humanitarian intervention’, ‘logic of exception’ and ‘traversing the phantasy’. Middle East Critique, 23(4), 387–404.Google Scholar

Carpenter, R. Charli (2005). ‘Women, children and other vulnerable groups’: Gender, strategic frames and the protection of civilians as a transnational issue. International Studies Quarterly, 49(2), 295–334.Google Scholar

Carver, Terrell (2016). Sex, gender, and sexuality. In Steans, Jill, and Tepe-Belfrage, Daniela, eds., Handbook on Gender in World Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 58–65.Google Scholar

Carvin, Stephanie (2012). The trouble with targeted killing. Security Studies, 21(3), 529–555.Google Scholar

Carvin, Stephanie (2015). Getting drones wrong. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(2), 127–141.Google Scholar

Carvin, Stephanie, and Williams, Michael J. (2015). Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, Stuart (2014). The use of armed drones. In Casey-Maslen, Stuart, ed., Weapons under international human rights law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 382–407.Google Scholar

Cavarero, Adriana (2008). Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Celermajer, Danielle, and Lefebvre, Alexandre (2020a). Introduction: Bringing the subject of human rights into focus. In Celermajer, Danielle, and Lefebvre, Alexandre, eds., The Subject of Human Rights. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1–25.Google Scholar

Celermajer, Danielle, and Lefebvre, Alexandre eds. (2020b). The Subject of Human Rights. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Chamayou, Grégoire (2011). The manhunt doctrine. Radical Philosophy, 169, 2–6.Google Scholar

Chamayou, Grégoire (2014). Ferngesteuerte Gewalt. Wien: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar

Chandler, David (2004). The Responsibility to Protect? Imposing the ‘liberal peace’. International Peacekeeping, 11(1), 59–81.Google Scholar

Chandler, David (2010). Born posthumously: Rethinking the shared characteristics of the ICC and R2P. Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 21, 5–13.Google Scholar

Chappell, Louise A. (2016). The Politics of Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court: Legacies and Legitimacy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary (2010). Feminist reflections on the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(3), 232–249.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary (2016). Gender and international law. In Steans, Jill, and Tepe-Belfrage, Daniela, eds., Handbook on Gender in World Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 137–144.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, and Chinkin, Christine (2000). The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1998). The constructivist turn in international relations. World Politics, 50(2), 324–348.Google Scholar

Chesney, Robert (2010). Who may be killed? Anwar al-Awlaki as a case study in the international legal regulation of lethal force. In Schmitt, Michael N., Arimatsu, Louise, and McCormack, Tim, eds., Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law – 2010. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 3–60.Google Scholar

Chowdhury, Arjun, and Duvall, Raymond (2014). Sovereignty and sovereign power. International Theory, 6(2), 191–223.Google Scholar

Chulov, Martin (2015). Syria peace talks pin hopes for end to war on Iran and Saudi Arabia. The Guardian, 30 March 2015.Google Scholar

CIA (2009). CIA Best Practices in Counterinsurgency. http://wikileaks.org/cia-hvt-counterinsurgency.Google Scholar

Clarke, Kamari M. (2009). Fictions of Justice. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Close, Joseph (2020). The ICC Refrains from Affirming a General Ban on Amnesties in the Gaddafi Admissibility Appeal Decision. https://internationallaw.blog/2020/04/20/the-icc-refrains-from-affirming-a-general-ban-on-amnesties-in-the-gaddafi-admissibility-appeal-decision/.Google Scholar

Cloward, Karisa (2016). When Norms Collide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. (2004). Whose sovereignty? Empire versus international law. Ethics & International Affairs, 18(3), 1–24.Google Scholar

Cohn, Carol (1987). Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs, 12(4), 687–718.Google Scholar

Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic (2012). Counting Drone Strike Deaths. https://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/COLUMBIACountingDronesFinal.pdf.Google Scholar

Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence (2008). Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=tjrc-gov.Google Scholar

Conley-Zilkic, Bridget (2014). Who is the subject of atrocities prevention? Global Responsibility to Protect, 6(4), 430–452.Google Scholar

Cook, Martin L. (2016). Ethical issues in targeting. In Ducheine, Paul A., Schmitt, Michael N., and Osinga, Frans P., eds., Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare. The Hague; Heidelberg; New York: T. M. C. Asser Press; Springer, 147–158.Google Scholar

Corsi, Jessica L. (2017). Drone deaths violate human rights: The applicability of the ICCPR to civilian deaths caused by drones. International Human Rights Law Review, 6(2), 205–241.Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2015). Drones and Targeted Killings: The Need to Uphold Human Rights and International Law. (Doc. 13731). http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/X2H-Xref-ViewPDF.asp?FileID=21580&lang=en.Google Scholar

Cox, Robert W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.Google Scholar

Craig, Katherine (2014). Tod vom Himmel. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 26 July 2014.Google Scholar

Crawford, Emily (2014). Terrorism and targeted killings under international law. In Saul, Ben, ed., Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism. Cheltenham; Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 250–270.Google Scholar

Crawford, Emily (2015a). Identifying the Enemy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crawford, James R., and Watkins, Jeremy (2010). International responsibility. In Besson, Samantha, and Tasioulas, John, eds., The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 283–298.Google Scholar

Crawford, Neta C. (2000). The passion of world politics: Propositions on emotion and emotional relationships. International Security, 24(4), 116–156.Google Scholar

Crawford, Neta C. (2013). Accountability for Killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crawford, Neta C. (2015b). Accountability for Targeted Drone Strikes Against Terrorists? Ethics & International Affairs, 25(1), 39–49.Google Scholar

Crilly, Rob (2018). Gaddafi’s son saif ‘to run for Libyan president’ in 2018 elections. The Telegraph, 20 March 2018.Google Scholar

Crossley, Noele (2020). Consistency, protection, responsibility. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 26(3), 473–499.Google Scholar

Crosston, Matthew (2014). Pandora’s presumption: Drones and the problematic ethics of techno-war. Journal of Strategic Security, 7(4), 1–24.Google Scholar

C-SPAN (2002). Defense Department Briefing. www.c-span.org/video/?168635-1/defense-department-briefing.Google Scholar

Çubukçu, Ayça (2013). The Responsibility to Protect: Libya and the problem of transnational solidarity. Journal of Human Rights, 12(1), 40–58.Google Scholar

Cudworth, Erika, and Hobden, Stephen (2013a). Complexity, ecologism, and posthuman politics. Review of International Studies, 39(3), 643–664.Google Scholar

Cudworth, Erika, and Hobden, Stephen (2013b). Of parts and wholes: International relations beyond the human. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 430–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunliffe, Philip (2016). From ISIS to ICISS: A critical return to the Responsibility to Protect report. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 233–247.Google Scholar

Cunliffe, Philip, and Kenkel, Kai M. (2016). Rising powers and intervention: Contested norms and shifts in global order. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(3), 807–811.Google Scholar

Cusumano, Eugenio (2019). Migrant rescue as organized hypocrisy: EU maritime missions offshore Libya between humanitarianism and border control. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(1), 3–24.Google Scholar

Cutler, Leonard (2017). President Obama’s Counterterrorism Strategy in the War on Terror: An Assessment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Daase, Christopher (1999). Kleine Kriege – Große Wirkung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Daase, Christopher (2013). Die Legalisierung der Legitimität – Zur Kritik der Schutzverantwortung als emerging norm. In Christopher, Daase, and Julian, Junk, eds., Die Friedenswarte: Journal of International Peace and Organization, 88(1–2), 41–62.Google Scholar

Dalhaus, Nora (2015). The responsibility while protecting—Brazil’s attempt to frame the R2P debate. In Staack, Michael, and Krause, Dan, eds., Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte. Opladen; Berlin; Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 217–228.Google Scholar

Davies, Bronwyn, and Harré, Rom (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.Google Scholar

Davis, Lynn E., McNerney, Michael J., and Greenberg, Michael D. (2016). Clarifying the Rules for Targeted Killing: An Analytical Framework for Policies Involving Long-Range Armed Drones. Cwww.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1610.html.Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne (2010). The European Court of Justice and the international legal order after Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal, 51(1), 1–49.Google Scholar

de Vos, Christian M. (2020). Complementarity, Catalysts, Compliance: The International Criminal Court in Uganda, Kenya, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Waal, Alexander (2013). African roles in the Libyan conflict of 2011. International Affairs, 89(2), 365–379.Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika (2006). The international constitutional order. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(1), 55–76.Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika, and Vidmar, Jure (2013). Conflicts between international paradigms: Hierarchy versus systemic integration. Global Constitutionalism - Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 2(2), 196–217.Google Scholar

Deeks, Ashley S. (2012). ‘Unwilling or unable’: Toward a normative framework for extraterritorial self-defense. Virginia Journal of International Law, 52(3), 483–550.Google Scholar

deGuzman, Margaret M. (2012). How serious are international crimes? The gravity problem in international criminal law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 51, 18–68.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole (2006). Überzeugung in der Politik: Grundzüge einer Diskurstheorie internationalen Regierens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole (2009). The discursive process of legalization: Charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case. International Organization, 63(1), 33–65.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth (2019). Norms under challenge: Unpacking the dynamics of norm robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 2–17.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth (2020). Things we lost in the fire: How different types of contestation affect the robustness of international norms. International Studies Review, 22(1), 51–76.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Keating, Michael (2008a). How many approaches in the social sciences? An epistemological introduction. In Donatella, Della Porta, and Michael, Keating, eds., Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–39.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Keating, Michael (2008b). Introduction. In Donatella, Della Porta, and Michael, Keating, eds., Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–15.Google Scholar

Deng, Francis M., Kimaro, Sadikiel, Lyons, Terrence, Rothschild, Donald, and Zartman, W. I. (1996). Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar

Diez, Thomas, Bode, Ingvild, and Fernandes da Costa, Aleksandra (2011). Key Concepts in International Relations. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Dill, Janina (2015a). Legitimate Targets? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dill, Janina (2015b). The informal regulation of drones and the formal legal regulation of war. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(1), 51–58.Google Scholar

Dill, Janina (2019). Do attackers have a legal duty of care? Limits to the ‘individualization of war’. International Theory, 11(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, Klaus,and Witt, Antonia (2020). Towards a Typology of Pathways: The Rise of People-Centred Norms in the Legitimation of Global Governance Organizations. Paper presented at the IB-Sektionstagung 7.–9.10.2020 Freiburg (online). On file with author.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, Klaus, Witt, Antonia, Lehmann, Ina, Reichel, Ellen, and Weise, Tobias (2019). International Organizations Under Pressure. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Director of National Intelligence (2016). Summary of Information Regarding U.S. Counterterrorism Strikes Outside Areas of Active Hostilities. www.dni.gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Press%20Releases/DNI+Release+on+CT+Strikes+Outside+Areas+of+Active+Hostilities.PDF.Google Scholar

Dixon, Martin (2007). Textbook on International Law. 6th ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, Martin (2013). Textbook on International Law. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Doezema, Jo (2005). Now you see her, now you don’t: Sex workers at the UN trafficking protocol negotiation. Social & Legal Studies, 14(1), 61–89.Google Scholar

Dombrowski, Peter (1998). Fragmenting identities, shifting loyalties: The influence of individualisation on global transformations. Global Society, 12(3), 363–388.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack (2007). The relative universality of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), 281–306.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack (2009). Realism. In Scott, Burchill, Andrew, Linklater, Richard, Devetak, Jack, Donnelly, Terry, Nardin, Matthew, Paterson, Christian, Reus-Smit, and Jacqui, True, eds., Theories of International Relations. 4th ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 31–56.Google Scholar

Donovan, Outi (2021). Trading freedoms for protection: Gender and localised protection in Libya. Global Responsibility to Protect, 13(4), 458–480.Google Scholar

Doty, Roxanne L. (1993). Foreign policy as social construction: A post-positivist analysis of U.S. counterinsurgency policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly, 37(3), 297–320.Google Scholar

Douven, Igor (2011). Peirce on Abduction. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/peirce.html.Google Scholar

Dresing, Thorsten, and Pehl, Thorsten (2015). Manual (On) Transcription: Transcription Conventions, Software Guides and Practical Hints for Qualitative Researchers. www.audiotranskription.de/english/manual-on-transcription.htm.Google Scholar

Droege, Cordula (2007). The interplay between international humanitarian law and international human rights law in situations of armed conflict. Israel Law Review, 40(2), 310–355.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark A. (2005). Collective violence and individual punishment: The criminality of mass atrocity. Northwestern University Law Review, 99(2), 539–610.Google Scholar

du Plessis, Max, and Louw, Antoinette (2011). Justice and the Libyan Crisis: The ICC’s Role Under Security Council Resolution 1970. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Full_Report_1087.pdf.Google Scholar

Dunford, Robin, and Neu, Michael (2019). The Responsibility to Protect in a world of already existing intervention. European Journal of International Relations, 25(4), 1080–1102.Google Scholar

Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, eds. (2020). International Relations Theories. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A. (2013). International law and international relations: Introducing an interdisciplinary dialogue. In Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A., eds., Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–32.Google Scholar

Eckes, Christina (2013). Individuals in a pluralist world: The implications of counterterrorist sanctions. Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 2(2), 218–236.Google Scholar

Edkins, Jenny, and Pin-Fat, Véronique (1999). The subject of the political. In Edkins, Jenny, Persram, Nalini, and Pin-Fat, Véronique, eds., Sovereignty and Subjectivity. Boulder; London: Lynne Rienner, 1–18.Google Scholar

Efrat, Asif (2015). Cross-national interviewing at international conferences: How to make the most of a unique research opportunity. International Studies Perspectives, 16(3), 302–311.Google Scholar

Ekelhof, Merel A. (2017). Complications of a common language: Why it is so hard to talk about autonomous weapons. Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 22(2), 311–331.Google Scholar

Emmerson, Ben (2013). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms While Countering Terrorism. (A/68/389). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/759181?ln=en.Google Scholar

Endoh, Fabrice T. (2020). African Union and the politics of selective prosecutions at the International Criminal Court. African Journal of International Criminal Justice, 6(1), 3–32.Google Scholar

Endoh, Fabrice T., and Mbao, M. L. Melvin (2016). Political dynamics in Kenya’s post-electoral violence: Justice without peace or political compromise? African Security Review, 25(3), 275–287.Google Scholar

Enemark, Christian (2014). Drones, risk, and perpetual force. Ethics & International Affairs, 28(3), 365–381.Google Scholar

Engelkamp, Stephan, Glaab, Katharina, and Graf, Antonia, eds. (2021). Kritische Normenforschung in den Internationalen Beziehungen. 1. Auflage; Baden-Baden: Nomos; Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Engelkamp, Stephan, Glaab, Katharina, and Renner, Judith (2012). In der Sprechstunde. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 19(2), 101–128.Google Scholar

Engelkamp, Stephan, Glaab, Katharina, and Renner, Judith (2013). Ein Schritt vor, zwei Schritte zurück? Eine Replik auf Nicole Deitelhoff und Lisbeth Zimmermann. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 20(2), 105–118.Google Scholar

English, Nicholas, and Rauschning, Tim (2013). The procurement and use of armed UAVs by the German military in international and German law. German Yearbook of International Law, 56, 539–555.Google Scholar

Enloe, Cynthia (2014). Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. 2nd ed. Berkley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Charlotte (2013). Theorizing agency in Hobbes’s wake: The rational actor, the self, or the speaking subject? International Organization, 67(2), 287–316.Google Scholar

Erameh, Nicholas I. (2017). Humanitarian intervention, Syria and the politics of human rights protection. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 517–530.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni (2008). Locating responsibility: The problem of moral agency in international relations. In Reus-Smit, Christian, and Snidal, Duncan, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 699–707.Google Scholar

European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (2017). Litigating Drone Strikes: Challenging the Global Network of Remote Killing. https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Publikationen/Litigating_Drone_Strikes_PDF.pdf.Google Scholar

Evers, Miles M. (2020). Just the facts: Why norms remain relevant in an age of practice. International Theory, 12(2), 220–230.Google Scholar

Fabri, Hélene R. (2008). Human rights and state sovereignty: Have the boundaries been significantly redrawn. In MacDonald, Euan, and Alston, Philip, eds., Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman, and Wodak, Ruth (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In van Dijk, Teujn Adrianus, ed., Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE, 258–285.Google Scholar

Fann, Kuni T. (1970). Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Farer, Tom. (2003). Humanitarian intervention before and after 9/11: Legality and legitimacy. In Holzgrefe, Jeff L., and Keohane, Robert O., eds., Humanitarian Intervention: Ethic, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–89.Google Scholar

Faude, Benjamin, and Fuß, Julia (2020). Coordination or conflict? The causes and consequences of institutional overlap in a disaggregated world order. Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 9(2), 268–289.Google Scholar

Fehl, Caroline (2018). Navigating Norm Complexity: A Shared Research Agenda for Diverse Constructivist Perspectives. (HFSK Working Papers No. 41). www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/PRIF_WP_41.pdf.Google Scholar

Fehl, Caroline (2019). Bombs, trials, and rights: Norm complexity and the evolution of liberal intervention practices. Human Rights Quarterly, 41(4), 839–915.Google Scholar

Fierke, Karin M. (2001). Critical methodology and constructivism. In Fierke, Karin M., and Jørgensen, Knud E., eds., Constructing International Relations. Armonk; London: M. E. Sharpe, 115–135.Google Scholar

Fierke, Karin M. (2010). Constructivism. In Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve, eds., International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 177–194.Google Scholar

Fierke, Karin M. (2013). Political Self-Sacrifice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fierke, Karin M., and Jørgensen, Knud E. (2001). Introduction. In Fierke, Karin M., and Jørgensen, Knud E., eds., Constructing International Relations. Armonk; London: M. E. Sharpe, 3–10.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, Claire (2012a). Preface. In Finkelstein, Claire, Ohlin, Jens D., and Altman, Andrew, eds., Targeted Killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, v–x.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, Claire (2012b). Targeted Killing as Preemptive Action. In Finkelstein, Claire, Ohlin, Jens D., and Altman, Andrew, eds., Targeted Killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 156–182.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha (1996). Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention. In Katzenstein, Peter J., ed., The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 153–185.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Teubner, Gunther (2004). Regime-collisions. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25(4), 999–1046.Google Scholar

Flick, Uwe (2003). Design und Prozess qualitativer Forschung. In Uwe, Flick, Ernst, von Kardorff, and Ines, Steinke, eds., Qualitative Forschung. 2nd ed. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, 252–265.Google Scholar

Flick, Uwe, Kardorff, Ernst von, and Steinke, Ines, eds. (2003). Qualitative Forschung. 2nd ed. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar

Flonk, Daniëlle, Jachtenfuchs, Markus, and Obendiek, Anke S. (2020). Authority conflicts in internet governance: Liberals vs. Sovereigntists? Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 9(2), 364–386.Google Scholar

Flynn, Gregory, and Farrell, Henry (1999). Piecing together the democratic peace: The CSCE, norms and the ‘construction’ of security in post-cold war Europe. International Organization, 53(3), 505–535.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Andreas (2020). Survey article: The legitimacy of international courts. Journal of Political Philosophy, 28(4), 476–499.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. (2013). ‘Political trials’? The UN Security Council and the development of international criminal law. In Schabas, William A., McDermott, Yvonne, and Hayes, Niamh, eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives. Surrey; Burlington: Ashgate, 475–497.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. (2018). Human Rights in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

France; Germany; Portugal; and United Kingdom (2011). Draft Resolution 04.10.2015. www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Syria%20S2011%20612.pdf.Google Scholar

Franke, Ulrich and Roos, Ulrich (2013). Einleitung: Zu den Begriffen ‘Weltpolitik’ und ‘Rekonstruktion’. In Franke, Ulrich, and Roos, Ulrich, eds., Rekonstruktive Methoden der Weltpolitikforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 7–29.Google Scholar

Franke, Ulrike E. (2014). Drones, drone strikes, and US policy: The politics of unmanned aerial vehicles (review essay). Parameters, 44(1), 121–130.Google Scholar

Franke, Ulrike E. (2015). The global diffusion of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or ‘drones’. In Aaronson, Mike, Aslam, Wali, Dyson, Tom, and Rauxloh, Regina, eds., Precision Strike Warfare and International Intervention. Oxon: Routledge, 52–72.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, Gunter (2011). Down by law: Irony, seriousness, and reason. German Law Journal, 12(1), 300–337.Google Scholar

Franz, Nina (2017). Targeted killing and pattern-of-life analysis: Weaponised media. Media, Culture & Society, 39(1), 111–121.Google Scholar

Freeden, Michael, and Stears, Marc (2013). Liberalism. In Freeden, Michael, Sargent, Lyman T., and Stears, Marc, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 329–347.Google Scholar

Freyberg-Inan, Annette (2004). What Moves Man. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Frick, Marie-Luisa (2021). Dehumanization and human rights. In Kronfeldner, Maria, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Dehumanization. Abingdon; Oxon; New York: Routledge, 187–200.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, Jörg (2009). From positivist pretense to pragmatic practice: Varieties of pragmatic methodology in IR scholarship. In Gunther, Hellmann, ed., International Studies Review. 11(3), Pragmatism and International Relations, 645–648.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, Jörg, and Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2009). On acting and knowing: How pragmatism can advance international relations research and methodology. International Organization, 63(4), 701–731.Google Scholar

Friesendorf, Cornelius (2019). Selbstschutz und Fremdschutz als Normenkonflikt? Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 26(1), 59–88.Google Scholar

Frost, Mervyn, and Lechner, Silviya (2016). Understanding international practices from the internal point of view. Journal of International Political Theory, 12(3), 299–319.Google Scholar

Frowe, Helen (2014). Defensive Killing. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fujii, Lee A. (2018). Interviewing in Social Science Research. New York; Abingdon; Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. (1964). The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fung, Courtney J. (2020). Rhetorical adaptation, normative resistance and international order-making: China’s advancement of the responsibility to protect. Cooperation and Conflict, 55(2), 193–215.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Adrian (2013). Genocide and Its Threat to Contemporary International Order. Houndmills; Basingstoke; Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Adrian (2016). Conceptualizing humanity in the English school. International Theory, 8(2), 341–364.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Adrian, and Ralph, Jason (2013). Syria: Can Legitimacy for Intervention Be Found in a Uniting for Peace Resolution? www.bss.leeds.ac.uk/2013/09/05/syria-can-legitimacy-for-intervention-be-found-in-a-uniting-for-peace-resolution/.Google Scholar

Ganor, Boaz (2014). Identifying the enemy in counterterrorism operations – A comparison of the Bush and Obama administrations. International Law Studies, 90, 341–360.Google Scholar

Garbett, Claire (2015). The Concept of the Civilian. Oxford; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

García Iommi, Lucrecia (2020). Whose justice? The ICC ‘Africa problem’. International Relations, 34(1), 105–129.Google Scholar

Gardam, Judith (1997). Women and the law of armed conflict: Why the silence? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 46(1), 55–80.Google Scholar

Garwood-Gowers, Andrew (2015). R2P ten years after the world summit: Explaining ongoing contestation over pillar III. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7(3–4), 300–324.Google Scholar

Gegout, Catherine, and Suzuki, Shogo (2020). China, Responsibility to Protect, and the case of Syria. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 26(3), 379–402.Google Scholar

Geneva Conventions Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) (1977). www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Treaty.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=D9E6B6264D7723C3C12563CD002D6CE4.Google Scholar

George, Terry (2004). Hotel Rwanda. Sydney: MGM Distributions.Google Scholar

Gerges, Fawaz A. (2016). ISIS: A History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gettinger, Dan (2019). The Drone Databook. https://dronecenter.bard.edu/projects/drone-proliferation/databook/.Google Scholar

Gevers, Christopher (2020). Africa and international criminal law. In Heller, Kevin J., Mégret, Frédéric, Nouwen, Sarah M., Ohlin, Jens D., and Robinson, Darryl, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 154–193.Google Scholar

Ghezelbash, Daniel, Moreno-Lax, Violeta, Klein, Natalie, and Opeskin, Brian (2018). Securitization of search and rescue at sea: The response to boat migration in the Mediterranean and offshore Australia. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 67(2), 315–351.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan (2013). From Kosovo to Syria—Why R2P Is of No Use If the UN Security Council Is Unable to Act Together. https://verfassungsblog.de/from-kosovo-to-syria-why-r2p-is-of-no-use-if-the-un-security-council-is-unable-to-act-together/.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan (2014a). Die Responsibility to Protect und Souveränität. In Volk, Christian, and Kuntz, Friederike, eds., Der Begriff der Souveränität in der transnationalen Konstellation. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 198–214.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan (2014b). The Responsibility to Protect: Words, deeds, and humanitarian interventions – A review essay. Journal of International Political Theory, 10(3), 361–370.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan (2015a). Individualized and yet dehumanized? Targeted killing via drones. Behemoth, 8(2), 128–153.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan (2015b). To prevent ‘future Kosovos and future Rwandas’: A critical constructivist view on the responsibility to protect. International Journal of Human Rights, 19(8), 1074–1097.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan, Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes, and Hofius, Maren (2021). Meaning-in-use: Zum Verhältnis von Normativität und Normalität in der Normenforschung. In Engelkamp, Stephan, Glaab, Katharina, and Graf, Antonia, eds., Kritische Normenforschung in Deutschland. Neue Wege in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 221–249.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan, Holzscheiter, Anna, and Liese, Andrea (2020a). Activating norm collisions: Interface conflicts in international drug control. Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 9(2), 290–317.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan, Holzscheiter, Anna, and Liese, Andrea (2020b). When Norms Collide: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Difficult Choices on the Hierarchy of Norms and Values. Duck of Minerva. www.duckofminerva.com/2020/05/when-norms-collide-the-covid-19-pandemic-and-difficult-choices-on-the-hierarchy-of-norms-and-values.html.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan, and Loges, Bastian (2020). Telling the story of R2P: The emplotment of R2P in the UN Security Council’s debates on Libya. In Hunt, Charles T., and Orchard, Phil, eds., Constructing the Responsibility to Protect. Abingdon; Oxon; New York: Routledge, 69–88.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan, and Wiener, Antje (2013). Responsibility to Protect. https://verfassungsblog.de/responsibility-to-protect-a-political-science-perspective-on-the-international-law-section-of-the-coalition-agreement/.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method. 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gifkins, Jess (2016). R2P in the UN Security Council: Darfur, Libya, and beyond. Cooperation and Conflict, 5(2), 148–165.Google Scholar

Gil Gil, Alicia, and Maculan, Elena (2015). Current trends in the definition of ‘perpetrator’ by the International Criminal Court: From the decision on the confirmation of charges in the Lubanga case to the Katanga judgment. Leiden Journal of International Law, 28(2), 349–371.Google Scholar

Gildemeister, Regine (2003). Geschlechterforschung (gender studies). In Uwe, Flick, Ernst, von Kardorff, and Ines, Steinke, eds., Qualitative Forschung. 2nd ed. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH, 213–223.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Alex, and Cornish, Flora (2014). Sensitizing questions: A method to facilitate analyzing the meaning of an utterance. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 48(4), 435–452.Google Scholar

Giumelli, Francesco, and Costa Buranelli, Filippo (2020). When states and individuals meet: The UN ombudsperson as a ‘contact point’ between international and world society. International Relations, 34(1), 46–66.Google Scholar

Glanville, Luke (2014). Armed humanitarian intervention and the problem of abuse after Libya. In Scheid, Don E., ed., The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–165.Google Scholar

Glanville, Luke (2016). Does R2P matter? Interpreting the impact of a norm. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 184–199.Google Scholar

Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect (2021). UN Security Council Resolutions and Presidential Statements Referencing R2P. www.globalr2p.org/resources/un-security-council-resolutions-and-presidential-statements-referencing-r2p/.Google Scholar

Goetz, John, and Winkler, Willi (2014). Die kalte Sprache des gezielten Tötens. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 19 December 2014.Google Scholar

Gómez-Mera, Laura (2016). Regime complexity and global governance: The case of trafficking in persons. European Journal of International Relations, 22(3), 566–595.Google Scholar

Goppel, Anna (2013). Killing Terrorists. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gorlick, Brian (2000). Human rights and refugees: Enhancing protection through international human rights law. Nordic Journal of International Law, 69(2), 117–177.Google Scholar

Gorski, Simone (2011). Individuals in International Law. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil.Google Scholar

Gött, Henner (2013). Die Lehre von den Völkerrechtssubjekten und die Entfaltung der internationalen Rechtsordnung. www.juwiss.de/die-lehre-von-den-volkerrechtssubjekten-und-die-entfaltung-der-internationalen-rechtsordnung/.Google Scholar

Grant, Rebecca (1991). The source of gender bias in international relations theory. In Grant, Rebecca, and Newland, Kathleen, eds., Gender and International Relations. Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 8–26.Google Scholar

Grant, Rebecca, and Newland, Kathleen (1991). Introduction. In Grant, Rebecca, and Newland, Kathleen, eds., Gender and International Relations. Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1–7.Google Scholar

Gray, Christine (2008). International Law and the Use of Force. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gray, Christine (2013). Targeted killings: Recent US attempts to create a legal framework. Current Legal Problems, 66(1), 75–106.Google Scholar

Grayson, Kyle, and Mawdsley, Jocelyn (2019). Scopic regimes and the visual turn in international relations: Seeing world politics through the drone. European Journal of International Relations, 25(2), 431–457.Google Scholar

Gregory, Derek (2015a). Angry Eyes (1). http://geographicalimaginations.com/2015/10/01/angry-eyes-1/.Google Scholar

Gregory, Thomas (2012). Potential lives, impossible deaths. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 14(3), 327–347.Google Scholar

Gregory, Thomas (2015b). Drones, targeted killings, and the limitations of international law. International Political Sociology, 9(3), 197–212.Google Scholar

Gregory, Thomas (2016). Dismembering the dead: Violence, vulnerability and the body in war. European Journal of International Relations, 22(4), 944–965.Google Scholar

Gregory, Thomas (2017). Targeted killings: Drones, noncombatant immunity, and the politics of killing. Contemporary Security Policy, 38(2), 212–236.Google Scholar

Gregory, Thomas (2020). The costs of war: Condolence payments and the politics of killing civilians. Review of International Studies, 46(1), 156–176.Google Scholar

Grieco, Joseph, Ikenberry, G. J., and Mastanduno, Michael (2019). Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives, Connections, and Enduring Questions. London: Macmillan; Red Globe Press.Google Scholar

Gromes, Thorsten, and Dembinski, Matthias (2019). Practices and outcomes of humanitarian military interventions: A new data set. International Interactions, 45(6), 1032–1048.Google Scholar

Gross, Michael L. (2006). Assassination and targeted killing: Law enforcement, execution or self-defence? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 23(3), 323–335.Google Scholar

Großklaus, Mathias (2017). Friction, not erosion: Assassination norms at the fault line between sovereignty and liberal values. Contemporary Security Policy, 38(2), 260–280.Google Scholar

Gubrium, Jaber F., Holstein, James A., Marvasti, Amir B., and McKinney, Amir B., eds. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar

Guiora, Amos N. (2013). Legitimate Target. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano (1993). Structural power: The limits of neorealist power analysis. International Organization, 47(3), 443–478.Google Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano (2000). A reconstruction of constructivism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147–182.Google Scholar

Haacke, Jürgen (2009). Myanmar, the Responsibility to Protect, and the need for practical assistance. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(2), 156–184.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1999). Bestialität und Humanität: Ein Krieg an der Grenze zwischen Recht und Moral. Die ZEIT, 29 April 1999.Google Scholar

Haddad, Bassam (2015). Four Years on: Now Easy Answers in Syria (Part 1). www.jadaliyya.com/Details/31890/Four-Years-On-No-Easy-Answers-in-Syria-Part-1.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emily (2013). Making Human Rights a Reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hahn, Kristina, and Holzscheiter, Anna (2013). The ambivalence of advocacy: Representation and contestation in global NGO advocacy for child workers and sex workers. Global Society, 27(4), 497–520.Google Scholar

Hailbronner, Kay (2007). Der Staat und der Einzelne als Völkerrechtssubjekt. In Wolfgang, Graf Vitzthum, ed., Völkerrecht. 4th ed. Berlin: de Gruyter, 217–325.Google Scholar

Hakimi, Monica (2014). Toward a legal theory on the Responsibility to Protect. The Yale Journal of International Law, 39(2), 247–280.Google Scholar

Halberstam, Daniel, and Stein, Eric (2009). The United Nations, the European Union, and the King of Sweden: Economic sanctions and individual rights in a plural world order. Common Market Law Review, 46, 13–72.Google Scholar

Hall, Stephanie (2014). Help wanted: American drone program needs multifaceted support to be effective. Journal of Strategic Security, 7(4), 57–80.Google Scholar

Hammady, Omar (2018). What went wrong with Libya’s failed elections. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/18/libya-elections-2021-postponed/.Google Scholar

Hanrieder, Tine (2011). The false promise of the better argument. International Theory, 3(3), 390–415.Google Scholar

Hansen, Lene (2006). Security as Practice. Oxford; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes (2020). International Relations as Politics among People. Abingdon; Oxon; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes, and Vetterlein, Antje, eds. (2020). The Rise of Responsibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra (1986). The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. Signs, 11(4), 645–664.Google Scholar

Harper, Douglas (2021a). Guilty. www.etymonline.com/word/guilty.Google Scholar

Harper, Douglas (2021b). Innocence.www.etymonline.com/word/innocence.Google Scholar

Harré, Rom, and van Langenhove, Luk, eds. (1999a). Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harré, Rom, and van Langenhove, Luk (1999b). The dynamics of social episodes. In Harré, Rom, and van Langenhove, Luk, eds., Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Malden: Blackwell, 1–13.Google Scholar

Harris Rimmer, Susan (2015). Is the Responsibility to Protect doctrine gender-neutral. In Thakur, Ramesh, and Maley, William, eds., Theorising the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 266–284.Google Scholar

Hartsock, Nancy C. (1987). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Harding, Sandra, ed., Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 157–180.Google Scholar

Hay, Colin (2002). Political Analysis. Houndmills; Basingstoke; Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2010). The Responsibility to Protect: ‘sound and fury signifying nothing’? International Relations, 24(2), 218–239.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2011). The Responsibility to Protect in international political discourse: Encouraging statement of intent or illusory platitudes? The International Journal of Human Rights, 15(8), 1331–1348.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2012). The Responsibility to Protect. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2016). Assessing the influence of the Responsibility to Protect on the UN Security Council during the Arab Spring. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 166–183.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2018a). Hollow Norms and the Responsibility to Protect. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2018b). The lack of ‘responsibility’ in the Responsibility to Protect. In Ulbert, Cornelia, Finkenbusch, Peter, Sondermann, Elena, and Debiel, Tobias, eds., Moral Agency and the Politics of Responsibility. London; New York: Routledge, 71–84.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan, and Pattison, James (2016). Introduction: The Responsibility to Protect after the Arab Spring. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 141–147.Google Scholar

Helfferich, Cornelia (2011). Die Qualität qualitativer Daten. 4th ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Heller, Joseph (1961). Catch-22. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin J. (2006). The shadow side of complementarity: The effect of article 17 of the Rome Statute on national due process. Criminal Law Forum, 17(3–4), 255–280.Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin J. (2013). ‘One hell of a killing machine’. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 11(1), 89–119.Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin J. (2014). Let’s Call Killing Al-Awlaki What It Still Is – Murder. http://opiniojuris.org/2014/06/23/lets-call-killing-al-awlaki-still-murder/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lets-call-killing-al-awlaki-still-murder.Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin J. (2015). The use and abuse of analogy in IHL. In Ohlin, Jens David, eds, Theoretical Boundaries of Armed Conflict and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 232–286.Google Scholar

Henriksen, Anders (2014). Jus ad bellum and American targeted use of force to fight terrorism around the world. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 19(2), 211–250.Google Scholar

Herborth, Benjamin (2004). Die via media als konstitutionstheoretische Einbahnstraße. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 11(1), 61–87.Google Scholar

Herborth, Benjamin (2012). The elusive nature of human nature: Hidden essentialism and the flight from social theory. International Studies Review, 14(4), 660–663.Google Scholar

Heupel, Monika, and Zürn, Michael, eds. (2017). Protecting the Individual from International Authority: Human Rights in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heyns, Christof (2013). The Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions. (A/68/382). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N13/473/63/pdf/N1347363.pdf.Google Scholar

Heyns, Christof, Akande, Dapo, Hill-Cawthorne, Lawrence, and Chengeta, Thompson (2016). The international law framework regulating the use of armed drones. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 65(4), 791–827.Google Scholar

Hiéramente, Mayeul (2013). Wahlen in Zeiten der Strafverfolgung. Die Friedenswarte: Journal of International Peace and Organization, 88(1–2), 187–205.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn (1978). Conceptual thinking about the individual in international law. British Journal of International Studies, 4(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn (1978–1979). Conceptual thinking about the individual in international law. New York Law School Law Review, 24, 11–29.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn (1994). Problems and Process. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

High Representative of Disarmament Affairs (2021). Briefing to the Security Council on the Implementation of Security Council Resolution 2118 (2013) On the Elimination of the Chemical Weapons Programme of the Syrian Arab Republic. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/05.06.21-Briefing-to-the-Security-Council-on-the-implementation-of-Security-Council-resolution-2118-2013-on-the-elimination-of-the-chemical-weapons-programme-of-the-Syrian-Arab-Republic--2.pdf.Google Scholar

Hill, Christopher (1999). ‘Where are we going?’ international relations and the voices from below. Review of International Studies, 25(1), 107–122.Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, Courtney (2020). International criminal accountability and the domestic politics of resistance: Case studies from Kenya and Lebanon. Law & Society Review, 54(2), 453–486.Google Scholar

Hinnebusch, Raymond (2020). Proxy wars and spheres of influence in post-ISIS Syria. IEMEd Mediterranean Yearbook 2020, 78–83.Google Scholar

Hinnebusch, Raymond, and Saouli, Adham, eds. (2020). The War for Syria: Regional and International Dimensions of the Syrian Uprising. Abingdon; Oxon; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hlavkova, Monika (2014). Reconstructing the civilian/combatant divide: A fresh look at targeting in non-international armed conflict. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 19(2), 251–278.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas (1966 [1651]). Leviathan. Neuwied; Berlin: Hermann Luchterhand Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar

Hobbs, Patricia (2020). The catalysing effect of the Rome Statute in Africa: Positive complementarity and self-referrals. Criminal Law Forum, 31(3), 345–376.Google Scholar

Hofius, Maren (2015). Constituting Community, Practicing Boundaries: European Union Diplomacy in Ukraine. PhD Thesis, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar

Hofius, Maren (2020). Towards a ‘theory of the gap’: Addressing the relationship between practice and theory. Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 9(1), 169–182.Google Scholar

Hofius, Maren, Wilkens, Jan, Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes, and Gholiagha, Sassan (2014). Den Schleier lichten? Kritische Normenforschung, Freiheit und Gleichberechtigung im Kontext des ‘Arabischen Frühlings’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 21(2), 85–105.Google Scholar

Hollis, Martin, and Smith, Steve (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hollway, Wendy (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In Henriques, Julian, Urwin, Cathy, Hollway, Wendy, Venn, Couze, and Walkerdine, Valerie, eds., Changing the Subject. London; New York: Methuen, 227–263Google Scholar

Holmes, Marcus, Jordan, Richard, and Parajon, Eric (2021). Assessing the renaissance of individuals in international relations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 542(2), 214–219.Google Scholar

Holmes, Marcus, and Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2020). Social bonding in diplomacy. International Theory, 12(1), 133–161.Google Scholar

Holzgrefe, Jeff L., and Keohane, Robert O., eds. (2003). Humanitarian Intervention: Ethic, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna (2005). Discourse as capability: Non-state actors’ capital in global governance. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 723–746.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna (2010). Children’s Rights in International Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna (2014). Between communicative interaction and structures of signification: Discourse theory and analysis in international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 15(2), 142–162.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna (2016). Representation as power and performative practice: Global civil society advocacy for working children. Review of International Studies, 42, 205–226.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna (2017a). The Politics of Age: Children and Older Persons as Contested Subjects in International Human Rights Law-Making. Conference paper presented at the 5th open section conference of the German Political Science Association (DVPW) IR Section, 4–6 October 2017, Bremen. On file with author.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna (2017b). Was vom arguing übrigblieb …. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 24(1), 143–159.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna, Gholiagha, Sassan, and Liese, Andrea (2022). Advocacy coalitions and norm collisions: Insights from international drug control, human trafficking, and child labour. Global Society, 36(1), 25–48.Google Scholar

Hoover, Joseph (2012). Reconstructing responsibility and moral agency in world politics. International Theory, 4(2), 233–268.Google Scholar

Hopgood, Stephen (2017). Human rights on the road to nowhere. In Hopgood, Stephen, Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie, eds., Human Rights Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283–310.Google Scholar

Hopgood, Stephen, Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie, eds. (2017a). Human Rights Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hopgood, Stephen, Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie, (2017b). Introduction: Human rights past, present, and future. In Hopgood, Stephen, Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie, eds., Human Rights Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–23.Google Scholar

Hülsse, Rainer (2007). Creating demand for global governance: The making of a global money-laundering problem. Global Society, 21(2), 155–178.Google Scholar

Human Rights Council (2011). The Current Human Rights Situation in the Syrian Arab Republic in the Context of Recent Events. (A/HRC/RES/S-16/1). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/RES/S-16/1.Google Scholar

Human Rights Council (2012). Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Libya. www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session19/A.HRC.19.68.pdf.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch (2013). ‘Between a Drone and Al-Qaeda” - the Civilian Cost of US Targeted Killings in Yemen. www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/yemen1013web.pdf.Google Scholar

Hunt, Charles T. (2016). Emerging powers and the Responsibility to Protect: Non-linear norm dynamics in complex international society. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(3), 870–890.Google Scholar

Hunt, Charles T., and Orchard, Phil, eds. (2020a). Constructing the Responsibility to Protect. Abingdon; Oxon; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hunt, Charles T., and Orchard, Phil, (2020b). Introduction: Consolidation and contestation of the Responsibility to Protect. In Hunt, Charles T. and Orchard, Phil, eds., Constructing the Responsibility to Protect. Abingdon; Oxon; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hunt, Lynn (2007). Inventing Human Rights: A History. 1st ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

ICC (2009). Warrant of Arrest for Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir. www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc639078.pdf.Google Scholar

ICC (2010a). Situation in the Republic of Kenya. (ICC-01/09). www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc854287.pdf.Google Scholar

ICC (2010b). Second Warrant of Arrest for Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir. www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200205/related%20cases/icc02050109/court%20records/chambers/ptci/Pages/95.aspx.Google Scholar

ICC (2011a). Decision on the ‘Prosecutor’s Application Pursuant to Article 58 as to Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar GADDAFI, Saif Al-Islam GADDAFI and Abdullah ALSENUSSI’. www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc1101337.pdf.Google Scholar

ICC (2011b). Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for Summons to Appear for William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey and Joshua Arap Sang. www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2011_02585.PDF.Google Scholar

ICC (2011c). Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for Summonses to Appear for Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta and Mohammed Hussein Ali. www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2011_02586.PDF.Google Scholar

ICC (2013). Decision on the Admissibility of the Case Against Abdullah Al-Senussi. (ICC-01/11-01/11). www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2013_07445.PDF.Google Scholar

ICC (2014). Notice of Withdrawal of the Charges Against Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. (ICC-01/09-02/11). www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2014_09939.PDF.Google Scholar

ICC (2015). Case Information Sheet: Situation in the Republic of Kenya – the Prosecutor vs Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. (ICC-PIDS-CIS-KEN-02-014/15_Eng). www.icc-cpi.int/CaseInformationSheets/kenyattaEng.pdf.Google Scholar

ICC (2019a). Case Information Sheet: Situation in Libya – the Prosecutor V. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi. www.icc-cpi.int/CaseInformationSheets/gaddafiEng.pdf.Google Scholar

ICC (2019b). Crime of Aggression – Amendments Ratification. https://asp.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/crime%20of%20aggression/Pages/default.aspx.Google Scholar

ICC (2019c). Decision on the ‘Admissibility Challenge by Dr. Saif Al-Islam Gadafi Pursuant to Articles 17(1)©, 19 and 20(3) Of the Rome Statute’. www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-01/11-01/11-662.Google Scholar

ICC (2020a). Kenya. www.icc-cpi.int/kenya.Google Scholar

ICC (2020b). Libya. www.icc-cpi.int/libya.Google Scholar

ICC (2020c). Situations under Investigation. www.icc-cpi.int/pages/situation.aspx.Google Scholar

ICC (2020d). Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi Against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I Entitled ‘Decision on the “Admissibility Challenge by Dr. Saif Al-Islam Gadafi Pursuant to Articles 17(1)©, 19 and 20(3) Of the Rome Statute”’ of 5 April 2019. www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-01/11-01/11-695.Google Scholar

ICC (2021a). Afghanistan. www.icc-cpi.int/afghanistan.Google Scholar

ICC (2021b). Ongwen Case. www.icc-cpi.int/uganda/ongwen.Google Scholar

ICC (2021c). Situation in Uganda in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2021_01026.PDF.Google Scholar

ICC (2021d). The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2021_04230.PDF.Google Scholar

ICISS (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar

ICJ (1951). Reservations on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. I.C.J. Reports. www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/12/4285.pdf.Google Scholar

ICJ (1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. I.C.J. Reports. www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/95/7495.pdf.Google Scholar

ICJ (2001). LaGrand Case (Germany v. United States of America). I.C.J. Reports. www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/104/7736.pdf.Google Scholar

ICJ (2007). Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. I.C.J. Reports. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/91/13685.pdf.Google Scholar

ICJ (2021). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar). www.icj-cij.org/en/case/178.Google Scholar

ICRtoP (2009). General Assembly Debate on the Responsibility to Protect and Informal Interactive Dialogue. www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/component/content/article/35-r2pcs-topics/2493-general-assembly-debate-on-the-responsibility-to-protect-and-informal-interactive-dialogue-.Google Scholar

ICTY (1995). PROSECUTOR V.DUSKO TADIC A/k/a ‘DULE’. www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acdec/en/51002.htm.Google Scholar

ICTY (2001). Prosectur v. Dragoljub Kunarac Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic. www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/tjug/en/kun-tj010222e.pdf.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael (2017). Human rights, global ethics, and the ordinary virtues. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(1), 3–16.Google Scholar

Independent International Commission on Kosovo (2000). The Kosovo Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

International Crisis Group (2019). Averting an ISIS Resurgence in Iraq and Syria. (Middle East report No 207). https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/207-averting-an-isis-resurgence.pdf.Google Scholar

International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (Stanford Law School) and Global Justice Clinic (NYU School of Law) (2012). Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/publication/313671/doc/slspublic/Stanford_NYU_LIVING_UNDER_DRONES.pdf.Google Scholar

Ipsen, Knut, Menzel, Eberhard, and Epping, Volker (2004). Völkerrecht. 5th ed. München: Beck.Google Scholar