Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:08:18.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - A Collaborative Approach for Coexistence with Wildlife in Rural Regions of Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2019

Beatrice Frank
Affiliation:
Capital Regional District of Victoria Regional Parks
Jenny A. Glikman
Affiliation:
Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global
Silvio Marchini
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo
Get access

Summary

Human–wildlife conflicts occur all over the world; however, their characteristics and background of conflicts can be different in each country. In Japan, large mammal species (e.g. deer, boars) are increasing their population and expanding ranges resulting in increase of agricultural damage in many parts of the country. Meanwhile, the majority of rural villages in Japan are facing depopulation and residents are ageing making it difficult to implement interventions to prevent damage. In this chapter, a collaborative approach for coexisting with wildlife in rural areas of Japan is introduced. In Hyogo Prefecture, university students in urban areas visit rural villages to help local residents prevent wildlife damage and to revitalize the region. In Tochigi Prefecture, local residents collaborate to cook and eat boar meat (captured around the region) to increase awareness about wildlife. These collaborative activities are contributing not only to prevent damage but to change local residents’ mindset; from negative perceptions that wildlife are something to endure to positive attitudes realizing that wildlife could be utilized for community development.
Type
Chapter
Information
Human–Wildlife Interactions
Turning Conflict into Coexistence
, pp. 177 - 197
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

9.7 References

Abrams, D., Ando, K. & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers’ turnover intentions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1027–39.Google Scholar
Agricultural Production Bureau of Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2009). Manual for Preventing Wildlife Damage: Capturing Boars, Deer, Macaques, and Crow. Tokyo: Agricultural Production Bureau of Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Bruskotter, J. T. & Wilson, R. S. (2014). Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conservation Letters, 7(3), 158–65.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office Japan. (2014). Annual report on the aging society, Tokyo, Japan. Available from www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/english/annualreport/2014/2014pdf_e.html (accessed July 2015).Google Scholar
Child, B. (1996). The practice and principles of community-based wildlife management in Zimbabwe: The CAMPFIRE programme. Biodiversity & Conservation, 5, 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, M. (2002). Resolving Human–Wildlife Conflicts: The Science of Wildlife Damage Management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Decker, D. J., Brown, T. L. & Siemer, W. F. (2001). Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management in North America. Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Division of Rural Development of Tochigi Prefecture. (2011). Agricultural damage by wildlife of 2010 (in Japanese). Available from www.pref.tochigi.lg.jp/g02/houdou/choujyuu-higai.html (accessed July 2012).Google Scholar
Frank, B. (2016). Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: An introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources, 29, 738–43.Google Scholar
Gandiwa, E., Heitonig, I. M. A., Lokhorst, A. M., Prins, H. H. T. & Leeuwis, C. (2013). CAMPFIRE and human–wildlife conflicts in local communities bordering Northern Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe. Ecology & Society, 18(4), art. 7.Google Scholar
Gore, M. L., Knuth, B. A., Curtis, P. D. & Shanahan, J. E. (2006). Stakeholder perceptions of risk associated with human–black bear conflicts in New York’s Adirondack Park campground: Implications for theory and practice. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 3643.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. & Nishida, T. (1999/2000). The influence of culture and strength of cultural identity on individual values in Japan and the United States. Intercultural Communication Studies, IX, 1.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, K., Ko, K., Fujinaga, H. & Lutz, R. (2008). Predictive ability of the Theory of Planned Behavior for mental health outcomes in Japanese vs. Chinese students. Journal of Health Science, 30, 2337 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Hyogo Prefecture. (2009). Management Plan of macaques (in Japanese). Available from http://web.pref.hyogo.jp/hw24/documents/000140432.pdf (accessed February 2012).Google Scholar
Hyogo Prefecture. (2010). Management Plan of boars (revised) (in Japanese). Available from http://web.pref.hyogo.jp/hw24/documents/000164532.pdf (accessed January 2012).Google Scholar
Ichikawa, H. & Sakurai, R. (2012). Evaluation of wildlife damage prevention program involving urban students (in Japanese). Paper for 2011 Research Grant of Oriental White Stork of Toyooka City. Available from www.city.toyooka.lg.jp/www/contents/1214890421676/html/common/other/4f7519ef008.pdf (accessed June 2014).Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2016). IUCN Red List: Asiatic Black Bear. Available from www.iucnredlist.org/species/22824/114252336 (accessed November 2018).Google Scholar
Japan Bear Network. (2010). Community Support Program at Nagano Prefecture (in Japanese). Available from www.japanbear.sakura.ne.jp/ckk/0324/ (accessed November 2018).Google Scholar
Kaji, K., Igota, H. & Suzuki, M. (2013). Science of Hunting for Wildlife Management in Japan. Tokyo: Asakura Press (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Karuizawa Web. (2011). Preventing encountering bears and boars; 120 people participated in the fifth year of underbrush cutting (in Japanese). Available from www.karuizawa.co.jp/topics/2011/09/5120/ (accessed January 2017).Google Scholar
Kawai, M. & Hayashi, Y. (2009). Rebellion of Wildlife. Tokyo: PHP Science World Research Centre (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Knight, J. (2006). Waiting for Wolves in Japan: An Anthropological Study of People–Wildlife Relations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Manfredo, M. J. (2008). Who Cares about Wildlife? Social Science Concepts for Exploring Human–Wildlife Relationships and Conservation Issues. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfredo, M. J., Vaske, J. J., Brown, P. J., Decker, D. J. & Duke, E. A. (2009). Wildlife and Society: The Science of Human Dimensions. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2007). Agricultural damage by wildlife in each prefecture in 2007 (in Japanese). Available from www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/tyozyu/higai/h_zyokyo/h19/pdf/ref_data02.pdf (accessed February 2012).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2008). Current situation and challenges regarding abandoned agricultural fields (in Japanese). Available from www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/tikei/houkiti/ (accessed November 2014).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2014a). Change of agricultural damage by wildlife (in Japanese). Available from www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/tyozyu/higai/h_zyokyo2/h26/pdf/160122-b.pdf (accessed January 2017).Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2014b). Agricultural damage by wildlife in each prefecture in 2014 (in Japanese). Available from www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/tyozyu/higai/h_zyokyo/h19/pdf/ref_data02.pdf (accessed November 2018).Google Scholar
Ministry of the Environment. (2007). Methodological research of monitoring Specified Wildlife Conservation and Management Plan: Fukushima Prefecture. Ministry of Environment, Fukushima, Japan (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Ministry of the Environment. (2013). Report regarding management of bears (in Japanese). Available from www.env.go.jp/nature/choju/plan/plan3-report/h24report_kuma.pdf (accessed January 2017).Google Scholar
Ministry of the Environment. (2015). Results of survey of population and habitats of deer and boars for implementing Specified Wildlife Capturing Programme based on revision of wildlife law (in Japanese). Available from www.env.go.jp/press/100922.html (accessed January 2017).Google Scholar
Ministry of the Environment. (2016a). Number of bears captured in 2016 (in Japanese). Available from www.env.go.jp/nature/choju/effort/effort12/capture-qe.pdf (accessed January 2017).Google Scholar
Ministry of the Environment. (2016b). Number of casualties caused by bears in 2016 (in Japanese). Available from www.env.go.jp/nature/choju/effort/effort12/injury-qe.pdf (accessed January 2017).Google Scholar
Mishra, C., Young, J. C., Fiechter, M., Rutherford, B. & Redpath, S. M. (2017). Building partnerships with communities for biodiversity conservation: Lessons from Asian mountains. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(6), 1583–91.Google Scholar
Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Fazey, I., Evely, A. C. & Kruijsen, J. H. J. (2014). Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 337–45.Google Scholar
Riley, S. J. & Decker, D. J. (2000). Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5, 5062.Google Scholar
Sakurai, R. (in press). Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management in Japan: from Asia to the World. Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
Sakurai, R., Enari, H., Matsuda, N. & Maruyama, T. (2014a). Testing social-psychological theories to predict residents’ behavioral intentions regarding wildlife issues – application of Theory of Planned Behavior and Wildlife Acceptance Capacity Model. Mammal Study, 54, 219–30 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Sakurai, R., Jacobson, S. K., Matsuda, N. & Maruyama, T. (2015). Assessing the impact of a wildlife education program on Japanese attitudes and behavioral intentions. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 542–55.Google Scholar
Sakurai, R., Jacobson, S. K. & Ueda, G. (2013b). Public perceptions of risk and government performance regarding bear management in Japan. Ursus, 24, 7082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakurai, R., Jacobson, S. K. & Ueda, G. (2014b). Public perceptions of significant wildlife in Hyogo, Japan. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 8895.Google Scholar
Sakurai, R., Matsuda, N., Maruyama, T. & Jacobson, S. K. (2013a). Overview of the model district program for reducing human–wildlife conflicts in Tochigi Prefecture. Wildlife & Human Society, 1(1), 4754 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Slagle, K. M., Bruskotter, J. T. & Wilson, R. S. (2012). The role of affect in public support and opposition to wolf management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 17, 4457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyooka City Government. (2012). Plan of the welfare of the aged and nursing care insurance at Toyooka City (in Japanese). Available from www.city.toyooka.lg.jp/www/contents/1333020316999/files/k0.pdf (accessed January 2017).Google Scholar
Tsunoda, H. & Enari, H. (2012). Ecological role and social significance of reintroducing wolves in Japan under the shrinking society. In Paula, A. & Crussi, H. F., eds., Wolves: Biology, Behaviour and Conservation. New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 177–98.Google Scholar
Ueda, G., Kanzaki, N. & Koganezawa, M. (2010). Changes in the structure of the Japanese hunter population from 1965 to 2005. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 15, 1626.Google Scholar
Vaske, J. J., Roemer, J. M. & Taylor, J. G. (2013). Situational and emotional influences on the acceptability of wolf management action in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 37(1), 122–8.Google Scholar
Waylen, K. A., Fischer, A., McGowan, P. J. K., Thirgood, S. J. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2010). Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions. Conservation Biology, 24, 1119–29.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S. & Rabinowitz, A. (2005). People and Wildlife, Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yamabata, N. (2011). Effect of chasing away by village on the home range and appearances of a macaques group: Verification in 7 area of Mie Prefecture. Journal of Rural Planning, 30, 381–6 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yokoyama, M., Sakata, H., Morimitsu, Y., Fujiki, D. & Muroyama, Y. (2008). Current status of and perspectives on The Specified Wildlife Conservation and Management Plans and monitoring for Japanese black bear in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan. Mammal Science, 48, 6571 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zajac, R. M., Bruskotter, J. T., Wilson, R. S. & Prange, S. (2012). Learning to live with black bears: A psychological model of acceptance. Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 1331–40.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×