Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 771
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Grittersová, Jana 2019. The politics of bank ownership and currency policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Cook, Kirsten A. Romi, Andrea M. Sánchez, Daniela and Sánchez, Juan Manuel 2019. The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,

    Majbouri, Mahdi 2019. Twins, family size and female labour force participation in Iran. Applied Economics, Vol. 51, Issue. 4, p. 387.

    NEDELJKOVIC, MILAN and SABOROWSKI, CHRISTIAN 2019. The Relative Effectiveness of Spot and Derivatives-Based Intervention. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,

    Cappelli, Riccardo Czarnitzki, Dirk Doherr, Thorsten and Montobbio, Fabio 2019. Inventor mobility and productivity in Italian regions. Regional Studies, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 43.

    Kilinç, Umut 2019. Export Destination Characteristics and Markups: The Role of Country Size. Economica, Vol. 86, Issue. 341, p. 116.

    Summerfield, Fraser 2019. Local Labour Markets and Theft: New Evidence from Canada. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81, Issue. 1, p. 146.

    Vergauwe, Skrålan and Gaeremynck, Ann 2019. Do measurement-related fair value disclosures affect information asymmetry?. Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 68.

    Goel, Rajeev K. and Saunoris, James W. 2019. Does variability in crimes affect other crimes? The case of international corruption and shadow economy. Applied Economics, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 239.

    Amuedo‐Dorantes, Catalina and Arenas‐Arroyo, Esther 2019. Immigration Enforcement and Children's Living Arrangements. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 11.

    Hasan, Mostafa Monzur and Habib, Ahsan 2019. Social capital and idiosyncratic return volatility. Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Crecelius, Andrew T. Lawrence, Justin M. Lee, Ju-Yeon Lam, Son K. and Scheer, Lisa K. 2019. Effects of channel members’ customer-centric structures on supplier performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 47, Issue. 1, p. 56.

    Johnson, William C. Nam, Sungwoo and Yi, Sangho 2019. The commitment value of takeover defenses. The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 79.

    Bach, Ruben L. and Eckman, Stephanie 2019. Participating in a panel survey changes respondents’ labour market behaviour. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 182, Issue. 1, p. 263.

    Sun, Qian 2018. Explaining the state-owned enterprise wage premium in China: is it unobserved heterogeneity?. Economic and Political Studies, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 135.

    Canace, Thomas G. Jackson, Scott B. and Ma, Tao 2018. R&D investments, capital expenditures, and earnings thresholds. Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 265.

    Grechyna, Daryna 2018. Shall We Riot Too? The Geographical Neighbor Impact on Political Instability. Kyklos, Vol. 71, Issue. 4, p. 581.

    Wuepper, David Yesigat Ayenew, Habtamu and Sauer, Johannes 2018. Social Capital, Income Diversification and Climate Change Adaptation: Panel Data Evidence from Rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 69, Issue. 2, p. 458.

    Dauda, Seidu 2018. Hospital and Health Insurance Markets Concentration and Inpatient Hospital Transaction Prices in the U.S. Health Care Market. Health Services Research, Vol. 53, Issue. 2, p. 1203.

    d’Agostino, Giorgio Dunne, John Paul and Pieroni, Luca 2018. Military Expenditure, Endogeneity and Economic Growth. Defence and Peace Economics, p. 1.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: February 2010

5 - Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression

Summary

ABSTRACT

Weak instruments can produce biased IV estimators and hypothesis tests with large size distortions. But what, precisely, are weak instruments, and how does one detect them in practice? This paper proposes quantitative definitions of weak instruments based on the maximum IV estimator bias, or the maximum Wald test size distortion, when there are multiple endogenous regressors. We tabulate critical values that enable using the first-stage F-statistic (or, when there are multiple endogenous regressors, the Cragg–Donald [1993] statistic) to test whether the given instruments are weak.

INTRODUCTION

Standard treatments of instrumental variables (IV) regression stress that for instruments to be valid they must be exogenous. It is also important, however, that the second condition for a valid instrument, instrument relevance, holds, for if the instruments are only marginally relevant, or “weak,” then first-order asymptotics can be a poor guide to the actual sampling distributions of conventional IV regression statistics.

At a formal level, the strength of the instruments matters because the natural measure of this strength – the so-called concentration parameter – plays a role formally akin to the sample size in IV regression statistics. Rothenberg (1984) makes this point in his survey of approximations to the distributions of estimators and test statistics.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Identification and Inference for Econometric Models
  • Online ISBN: 9780511614491
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614491
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×