Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:43:10.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Job insecurity and employability among temporary workers: a theoretical approach based on the psychological contract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2009

By
Nele De Cuyper  and
Hans De Witte
Edited by
Katharina Naswall ,
Johnny Hellgren  and
Magnus Sverke
Nele De Cuyper
Affiliation:
K. U. Leuven, Belgium
Hans De Witte
Affiliation:
K. U. Leuven, Belgium
Katharina Naswall
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Johnny Hellgren
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Magnus Sverke
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Get access

Summary

Socio-economic studies have been reporting on the rapid growth of temporary employment and on its problematic nature in terms of low pay, limited access to fringe benefits, and limited union protection (Kalleberg, Reskin, and Hudson, 2000; Korpi and Levin, 2001). Temporary employment refers to dependent jobs of limited duration, with fixed-term employment contracts and temporary agency work being the most common contract types in Europe (OECD, 2002). With this evolution in the foreground, a major theme among work and organizational psychologists concerns the impact of temporary employment arrangements on employees’ well-being, attitudes, and behavior. The possible benevolent or detrimental consequences of temporary employment as compared to permanent employment are still hotly debated. Results until now have been inconclusive (Connelly and Gallagher, 2004; De Cuyper, De Witte, and Isaksson, 2005; Guest, 2004). While this has encouraged studies to explore the differences between permanent and temporary workers, the mixed evidence has resulted in a lack of theoretically informed studies (Davis-Blake and Uzzi, 1993). Hence, our understanding of the psychological impact of temporary employment and its underlying processes remains limited.

In this chapter, we formulate a theory that may respond to this lacuna. We draw upon psychological contract literature to interpret the inconsistent findings of contract type as found in previous research. Furthermore, we illustrate the possible implications of this theory for the experience and impact of job insecurity and employability.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Individual in the Changing Working Life , pp. 88 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, N. and Schalk, R. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19: 637–47.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., and Dallner, M. (2002). Work environment and health in different types of temporary jobs. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 11: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. (1984). Manpower strategies for flexible organizations. Personnel ManagementAugust: 28–31.Google Scholar
Barringer, M. W. and Sturman, M. C. (1998). The effects of variable work arrangements on the organizational commitment of contingent workers. Working paper, Cornell University.
Baruch, Y. and Hind, P. (1999). Perpetual motion in organizations: effective management and the impact of the new psychological contract on “survivor syndrome.”European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 8: 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, K. M. and Edwards, J. R. (1995). Employees at risk: contingent work and the psychological experience of contingent workers. In Cooper, C. I. and Rousseau, D. M. (eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (vol. 2, pp. 109–26). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bernhard, C. and Sverke, M. (2003). Work attitudes, role stress and health among different types of temporary workers in the Swedish health care sector. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management 11: 1–16.Google Scholar
Bernhard-Oettel, C., Sverke, M., and Witte, H. (2005). Comparing three alternative types of employment with permanent full-time work: how do employment contract and perceived job conditions relate to health complaints?Work and Stress 19: 301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berntson, E. and Marklund, S. (2006). The relationship between employability and subsequent health. Paper presented at the Sixth Conference on Psychology and Health, 8–10 May, Kerkrade, The Netherlands.
Cavanaugh, M. A. and Noe, R. A. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of relational components of the new psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20: 323–40.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambel, M. J. and Castanheira, F. (in press). They don't want to be temporaries: similarities between temps and core workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Cohany, S. R. (1996). Workers in alternative employment arrangements. Monthly Labor Review 119: 31–45.Google Scholar
Cohany, S. R.(1998). Workers in alternative employment arrangements. A second look. Monthly Labor Review 121: 3–21.Google Scholar
Connelly, C. E. and Gallagher, D. G. (2004). Emerging trends in contingent work research. Journal of Management 30: 959–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, N. and Briner, R. B. (2002). Full-time versus part-time employees: understanding the link between work status, the psychological contract and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior 61: 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. and Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies 37: 903–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. and Kessler, I.(2002). Contingent and non-contingent working in local government: contrasting psychological contracts. Public Administration 80: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis-Blake, A. and Uzzi, B. (1993). Determinants of employment externalization: a study of temporary workers and independent contractors. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuyper, N. and Witte, H. (2005). Job insecurity: mediator or moderator of the relationship between type of contract and various outcomes?South-African Journal of Industrial Psychology (special issue) 31: 79–86.Google Scholar
Cuyper, N. and Witte, H.(2006). The impact of job insecurity and contract type on attitudes, well-being and behavioural reports: a psychological contract perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 79: 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., and Isaksson, K. (2005). Temporary employment in Europe: conclusions. In Cuyper, N., Isaksson, K., and Witte, H. (eds.), Employment contracts and well-being among European workers (pp. 225–43). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gilder, D. (2003). Commitment, trust and work behavior. The case of contingent workers. Personnel Review 32: 588–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grip, A., Loo, J., and Sanders, J. (2004). The industry employability index: taking account of supply and demand characteristics. International Labour Review 143: 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsen, L. (1998). Zijn externe flexibiliteit en employability strijdig? [Do external flexibility and employability conflict?]. Tijdschrift voor HRM 1: 27–45.Google Scholar
Witte, H. (1999). Job insecurity and psychological well-being: review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 8: 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Witte, H., De Cuyper, N., Bernhard-Oettel, C., and Isaksson, K. (2005). The psychological contract of temporary workers. Paper presented at the 12th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology, Istanbul.
Witte, H. and Näswall, K. (2003). Objective versus subjective job insecurity: consequences of temporary work for job satisfaction and organizational commitment in four European countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy 24: 149–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiNatale, M. (2001). Characteristics of and preference for alternative work arrangements. Monthly Labor Review 124: 28–49.Google Scholar
Ellingson, J. E., Gruys, M. L., and Sackett, P. R. (1998). Factors related to the satisfaction and performance of temporary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 913–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. C. (1990). Reconceptualizing the nature and consequences of part-time work. Academy of Management Review 15: 103–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, D. C., Doerpinghaus, H. I., and Turnley, W. H. (1994). Managing temporary workers: a permanent HRM challenge. Organizational Dynamics 23: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrier, A. and Sels, L. (2003a). Temporary employment and employability: training opportunities and efforts of temporary and permanent employees in Belgium. Work, Employment and Society 17: 641–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrier, A. and Sels, L. (2003b). The concept employability: a complex mosaic. International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management 3: 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, C. and Schalk, R. (1996). Implications of differences in psychological contracts for human resource management. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 5: 501–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., and Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Employability: a psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior 65: 14–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, D. G. and Parks, McLean J. (2001). I pledge thee my troth … contingently: commitment and the contingent work relationship. Human Resource Management Review 11: 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, D. G. and Sverke, M. (2005). Contingent employment contracts: are existing employment theories still relevant?Economic and Industrial Democracy 26: 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudswaard, A. and Andries, F. (2002). Employment status and working conditions. Luxemburg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Goudswaard, A., Kraan, K. O., and Dhondt, S. (2000). Flexibiliteit in balans: flexibilisering en de gevolgen voor werkgever én werknemer [Flexibility in balance: flexibility of labor and the consequences for employer and employee]. Hoofddorp: TNO Arbeid.Google Scholar
Guest, D. (2004). Flexible employment contracts, the psychological contract and employee outcomes: an analysis and review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Review 5/6: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, D. and Clinton M. (2005). Contracting in the UK: current research evidence on the impact of flexible employment and the nature of psychological contracts. In Cuyper, N., Isaksson, K., and Witte, H. (eds.), Employment contracts and well-being among European workers (pp. 201–24). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Guest, D. and Conway, N. (2000). The psychological contract in the public sector. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
Guest, D., Mackenzie Davey, K., and Patch, A. (2003). The psychological contracts, attitudes and behaviour of workers on temporary and permanent contracts. Management Centre Working Paper 19. London: King's College.
Hall, D. T. and Chandler, D. E. (2005). Psychological success: when the career is a calling. Journal of Organizational Behavior 26: 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. T. and Moss, J. E. (1998). The new protean career contract: helping organizations and employees adapt. Organizational Dynamics 26: 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herriot, P. and Pemberton, C. (1995). New deals: the revolution in managerial careers. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hiltrop, J. M. (1995). The changing psychological contract: the human resource challenge of the 1990s. European Management Journal 13: 286–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoque, K. and Kirkpatrick, I. (2003). Non-standard employment in the management and the professional workforce: training, consultation, and gender implications. Work, Employment and Society 17: 667–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksson, K. S. and Bellaagh, K. (2002). Health problems and quitting among female “temps.”European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 11: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. L. and O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2003). The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: not all social exchange violations are created equal. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24: 627–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L., Reskin, B. F., and Hudson, K. (2000). Bad jobs in America: standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review 65: 256–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. E. (2000). White collar reactions to job insecurity and the role of the psychological contract: implications of human resource management. Human Resource Management 39: 79–92.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnunen, U. and Nätti, J. (1994). Job insecurity in Finland: antecedents and consequences. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 4: 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluytmans, F. and Ott, M. (1999). Management of employability in the Netherlands. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 8: 261–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, W. L. and Yer, L. K. (2000). The impact of employee–organization relationship on temporary employees’ performance and attitudes: testing a Singaporean sample. International Journal of Human Resource Management 11: 366–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, T. and Levin, H. (2001). Precarious footing: temporary employment as a stepping stone out of unemployment in Sweden. Work, Employment and Society 15: 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, M. (2000). Effects of short- and long-term preference for temporary work upon psychological outcomes. International Journal of Manpower 21: 635–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, M., Brandwein, T., and Fox, S. (1995). Work attitudes and emotional responses of permanent, voluntary, and involuntary temporary-help employees: an exploratory study. Applied Psychology: An International Review 44: 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, L., Edwards, J. R., and Cable, D. M. (2003). Breach and fulfillment of the psychological contract: a comparison of traditional and expanded views. Personnel Psychology 56: 895–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, J. H., Barringer, M. W., and Milkovich, G. T. (2002). Boundaryless and traditional contingent employees: worlds apart. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23: 425–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matusik, S. F. and Hill, C. W. (1998). The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23: 680–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., Mäkikangas, A., and Nätti, J. (2005). Psychological consequences of fixed-term employment and perceived job insecurity among health care staff. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 14: 209–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, D. J. and Makin, P. J. (2000). The psychological contract, organizational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal 21: 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, McLean J., Kidder, D. L., and Gallagher, D. G. (1998). Fitting square pegs into round holes: mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19: 697–730.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuaid, R. W. and Lindsay, C. (2005). The concept of employability. Urban Studies 42: 179–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, L. J. and Brewerton, P. M. (1999). Contractors and their psychological contract. British Journal of Management 10: 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, L. J. and Brewerton, P. M.(2000). Psychological contracts: employee relations for the twenty-first century? In Cooper, C. L. and Robertson, I. T. (eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 15, pp. 1–61). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Millward, L. J. and Hopkins, L. (1998). Psychological contracts, organizational and job commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28: 1530–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirvis, P. H. and Hall, D. T. (1994). Psychological success and the boundaryless career. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15: 365–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. D. S. and Vekker, A. (2001). An alternative look at temporary workers, their choices, and the growth in temporary employment. Journal of Labor Research 22: 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näswall, K. and Witte, H. (2003). Who feels insecure in Europe? Predicting job insecurity from background variables. Economic and Industrial Democracy 24: 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2005). Employment outlook. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Sprigg, C. A., and Wall, T. A. (2002). Effect of temporary contracts on perceived work characteristics and job strain: a longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology 55: 689–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. L. (1998). Job insecurity is important, but not for the reasons you might think: the example of contingent workers. In Cooper, C. L. and Rousseau, D. M. (eds.), Trends in organization behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 31–46). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Polivka, A. E. (1996). Into contingent and alternative employment: by choice?Monthly Labor Review 119: 55–74.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., and Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: a longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal 37: 137–52.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L. and Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: the effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 16: 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S. L. and Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15: 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J. K. (1995). Just a temp. Experience and structure of alienation in temporary clerical employment. Work and Occupations 22: 137–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: a study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior 11: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M.(1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. and Schalk, R. (2000). Psychological contracts in employment: cross cultural perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. and Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1995). Changing individual–organization attachments. A two-way street. In Howard, A. (ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 290–322). The Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Saloniemi, A., Virtanen, P., and Vahtera, J. (2004). The work environment in fixed-term jobs: are poor psychosocial conditions inevitable?Work, Employment and Society 18: 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, L. M. and Tetrick, L. E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. In Cooper, C. L. and Rousseau, D. M. (eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (pp. 91–109). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sverke, M., Gallagher, D. G., and Hellgren, J. (2000). Alternative work arrangements: job stress, well-being, and work attitudes among employees with different employment contracts. In Isaksson, K., Hogstedt, L., Eriksson, C., and Theorell, T. (eds.), Health effects of the new labour market (pp. 85–101). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Sverke, M. and Hellgren, J. (2002). The nature of job insecurity: understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium. Applied Psychology: An International Review 51: 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., and Näswall, K. (2002). No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 7: 242–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyne, , , L. and Ang, S. (1998), Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal 41: 692–703.Google Scholar
Virtanen, M., Kivimäki, M., Joensuu, M., Virtanen, P., Elovainio, M., and Vahtera, J. (2005). Temporary employment and health: a review. International Journal of Epidemiology 34: 610–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virtanen, M., Kivimäki, M., Virtanen, P., Elovainio, M., and Vahtera, J. (2003). Disparity in occupational training and career planning between contingent and permanent employees. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 12: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, P., Vahtera, J., Kivimäki, M., Pentti, J., and Ferrie, J. F. (2002). Employment security and health. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health 56: 569–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warr, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work and Stress 8: 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worth, S. (2002). Education and employability: school leavers’ attitudes to the prospect of non-standard work. Journal of Education and Work 15: 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×