Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T01:35:17.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - How could populations of neurons encode information?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2009

Christian Holscher
Affiliation:
University of Ulster
Matthias Munk
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik, Tübingen
Get access

Summary

Information representation in neuronal populations: what is the “machine language” of the brain?

Research in the area of neuroscience and brain functions has made extraordinary progress in the last 50 years, in particular with the advent of novel methods that enables us to look at the properties of neuroanatomy and neurophysiology in much finer detail, and even at the activity of living brains during the performance of tasks. However, the question of how information is actually represented and encoded by neurons is still one of the “final frontiers” of neuroscience, and surprisingly little progress has been made here. How information is encoded in the brain has captivated medics, scientists, and philosophers for centuries. Scholars such as Leonardo da Vinci or René Descartes had already an astonishingly detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the brain, and had made suggestions that it is the brain that processes information and even harbors the seat of the personality or of the soul. However, whenever suggestions are brought forward how information might be processed and represented in the brain, these often turn out to be simplistic and idealistic. These rarely add up to more than a kind of “homunculus” that somehow receives information that is received via the eyes or the ears. This model only transfers the problem of information representation from the brain to the homunculus.

One problem with the research of information encoding is that it is completely counter-intuitive.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Engel, A. K., Fries, P., and Singer, W. (2001). Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:704–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghose, G. M. and Maunsell, J. (1999). Specialized representations in visual cortex: a role for binding?Neuron 24:79–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hölscher, C. (2003). Time, space, and hippocampal functions. Rev Neurosci 14:253–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malsburg, C. von (1981). The Correlation Theory of Brain Function, Technical Report 81–2. Frankfurt, Germany: Biophysical Chemistry, Max Planck Institute.Google Scholar
Maunsell, J. H. and Cook, E. P. (2002). The role of attention in visual processing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:1063–1072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, J. H. and Desimone, R. (1999). The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem. Neuron 24:19–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riesenhuber, M. and Poggio, T. (1999). Are cortical models really bound by the “binding problem”?Neuron 24:87–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serre, T., Wolf, L., Bileschi, S., Riesenhuber, M., and Poggio, T. (2007). Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29:411–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shadlen, M. N. and Movshon, J. A. (1999). Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24:67–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, W. (1999). Striving for coherence. Nature 397:391–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsunoda, K., Yamane, Y., Nishizaki, M., and Tanifuji, M. (2001). Complex objects are represented in macaque inferotemporal cortex by the combination of feature columns. Nat Neurosci 4:832–838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. (1993). A Vision of the Brain. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×