Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-06T17:40:00.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Concluding Reflections:

Evolving Cultural Models in Global and National Society

from Part V - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2021

Ronald L. Jepperson
Affiliation:
University of Tulsa
John W. Meyer
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

The cultural frameworks organizing social activity in three distinct periods within the postwar era:embedded liberalism, neoliberalism, and now an emergent postliberal period. As institutional theories were useful in analyzing the effects of liberal models, they are likely to be useful in understanding waves of postliberalism.

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutional Theory
The Cultural Construction of Organizations, States, and Identities
, pp. 297 - 321
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G. & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture, Boston, MA: Little, Brown, & Co.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. (2009). The New Old World, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, B. (2019). The Economists’ Hour, New York, NY: Little, Brown, & Co.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1996). Jihad vs. McWorld, New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boli, J. & Lechner, F. J. (2015). Globalization and World Culture. In Wright, J. D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 225–32.Google Scholar
Boli, J. & Thomas, G. (1999). Constructing World Culture: International Non-Governmental Organizations Since 1875, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, E. & Meyer, J. W. (1998). Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law. Soziale Welt, 49(3), 213–32.Google Scholar
Bromley, P. & Meyer, J. W. (2015). Hyper-Organization: Global Organizational Expansion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bromley, P., Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2011). Student-Centeredness in Social Science Textbooks: Cross-National Analyses, 1970–2005. Social Forces, 90(2), 547–70.Google Scholar
Bromley, P. & Powell, W. W. (2012). From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, P., Schofer, E., & Longhofer, W. (2019). Contentions over World Culture: The Rise of Legal Restrictions on Foreign Funding to NGOs, 1994–2015. Social Forces, soz138: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, H. & Watson, A., eds. (1985). The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Z. D. (2020). The Price of Peace, New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1966). The Myth of the State, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chirot, D. (2011). Contentious Identities, New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cole, W. M. & Ramirez, F. O. (2013). Conditional Decoupling: Assessing the Impact of National Human Rights Institutions, 1981 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 702–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C. (1999). Social Change in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy, London: Polity.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. W. (1970). The Higher Circles, New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Drori, G., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H., eds. (2006). Globalization and Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drori, G., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Drori, G. & Moon, H. (2006). The Changing Nature of Tertiary Education: Cross-national Trends in Disciplinary Enrollment, 1965–1995. In Baker, D. & Wiseman, A., eds., The Impact of Comparative Education Research on Institutional Theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 15786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1968). The Active Society, New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Frank, D., Camp, B., & Boutcher, S. (2010). Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 867–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. J. & Gabler, J. (2006). Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Changes in Academic Emphases over the Twentieth Century, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, D. J. & Meyer, J. W. (2002). The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Postwar Period. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 86105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay, New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1958). The Affluent Society, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gitlin, T. (1995). The Twilight of Common Dreams, New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Goodhart, D. (2017). The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics, London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Guilluy, C. (2019). Twilight of the Elites. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Halsey, A. H. (1978). Change in British Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hironaka, A. (2005). Neverending Wars, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hironaka, A. (2014). Greening the Globe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1999). On the Edge of the New Century, New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, R. (1962). Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
Hwang, H. (2006). Planning Development: Globalization and the Shifting Locus of Planning. In Drori, G., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H., eds., Globalization and Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.6990.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). Postmaterialist Values and the Erosion of Institutional Authority. In Nye, J. S., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. C., eds., Why People Don’t Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ionescu, G. & Gellner, E. (1969). Populism, New York, NY: Macmillan Publishers.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. (2019). Democracy and Prosperity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, D. (1995). Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Judis, J. (2016). The Populist Explosion, New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar
Judt, T. (2005). Postwar, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kakutani, M. (2018). The Death of Truth, New York, NY: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
Kurtz, L. (2007). Gods in the Global Village, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Kuttner, R. (2018). Can Democracy Survive Global Capitalism? New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lauren, P. G. (2003). The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lechner, F. & Boli, J. (2005). World Culture, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindvall, J. & Sebring, J. (2005). Policy Reform and the Decline of Corporatism in Sweden. West European Politics, 28(5), 1057–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. & Rokkan, S. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments, New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. & Schneider, W. (1983). The Confidence Gap, New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Luttwak, E. (1998). Turbo-Capitalism, London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (2013). The Sources of Social Power, vol. 4: Globalizations, 1945–2011, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marwick, A. (1986). The Upper Class in Britain, France, and the U.S. Since the First World War. In Marwick, A., ed., Class in the Twentieth Century. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Pope, S., & Isaacson, A. (2015). Legitimating the Transnational Corporation in a Stateless World Society. In Tsutsui, K. & Lim, A., eds., Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Soysal, Y. (1992). World Expansion of Mass Education, 1870–1970. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 128–49.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism Alone, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. (1956). The Power Elite, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, T. (2018). The Death of Expertise, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reich, R. (1992). The Work of Nations, New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Reich, R. (2007). Supercapitalism, New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Reich, R. (2020). The System, New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization, 36(2), 379415.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. (1998). Globalization and the Embedded Liberalism Compromise: The End of an Era? In Streeck, W., ed., Internationale Wirtschaft, Nationale Demokratie: Herausforderungen für die Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 7997.Google Scholar
Schofer, E., Lerch, J., & Meyer, J. W. (2019). Illiberal Reactions to the University in the 21st Century, New York, NY: Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Schofer, E. & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The World-Wide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898920.Google Scholar
Shils, E. (1982). The Constitution of Society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, T. (2018). The Road to Unfreedom, New York, NY: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of Citizenship, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stacy, H. M. (2009). Human Rights for the 21st Century: Sovereignty, Civil Society, Culture, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Steger, M. B. & Roy, R. K. (2010). Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. (1997). On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 118.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2010). Re-Forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, M., ed. (1966). Modernization, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×