Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-04T13:01:38.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Bringing change into the lives of the poor: entrepreneurship outside traditional boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

By
Ignasi Martí  and
Johanna Mair
Edited by
Thomas B. Lawrence ,
Roy Suddaby  and
Bernard Leca
Thomas B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Roy Suddaby
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Bernard Leca
Affiliation:
ESC Rouen
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The powerful imagery of entrepreneurship as a means to induce and explain institutional change is gaining momentum (Greenwood & Suddaby, 2006; Lawrence & Suddaby, 2006). In response to criticisms that institutional theory was chiefly being used to explain homogeneity and persistence, important efforts have been devoted to restoring human agency in explanations of endogenous institutional change (DiMaggio, 1988; Sewell, 1992; Emirbayer & Mische, 1998). However, the image of the entrepreneur as institutional change agent has also been a source of controversy among institutional theorists, especially when accompanied by voluntarist, un-embedded conceptions of individual action (Holm, 1995; Leca & Naccache, 2006). As a result we observe vivid scholarly discussions on how to solve the “paradox of embedded agency”– i.e. on explaining how institutional change is possible if actors are fully conditioned by the institutions that they wish to change (Holm, 1995; Seo & Creed, 2002; Greenwood & Suddaby, 2006).

The current debate is important and we welcome more agent-oriented views on institutions. The purpose of this chapter is to advance institutional theory by rethinking various aspects of institutional work (Lawrence & Suddaby, 2006; DiMaggio, 1988) and thereby to contribute new insights into the paradox of embedded agency. We do so by challenging and breaking dominant patterns in current empirical research. While previous research on institutional entrepreneurship has predominantly looked at elite and/or powerful actors (DiMaggio, 1988; Fligstein & Mara-Drita, 1996) who assume either peripheral (Leblebici, Salancik, Copay & King, 1991) or central (Greenwood & Suddaby, 2006) positions, we focus instead on institutional work carried out by actors with limited power and very few resources.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutional Work
Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations
 , pp. 92 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arendt, H. (1957) The Human Condition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, G. (2005) Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A. V. & He, R. (2004) Making aid work. MIT mimeo, February 10.
Barley, S. & Tolbert, P. S.. (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institutions. Organization Studies, 18(1): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, R. (1981) Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Battilana, J. (2006) Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals' social position. Organization, 13(5): 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979) Algeria 1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for Editions de la Sciences de l'Homme, Paris.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1993) Sociology in Question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. & Lindberg, L. N. (1990) Property rights and the organization of economic activity by the State. American Sociological Review, 55(October): 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, E. S. (1993) Organizational repertoires and institutional change: women's groups and the transformation of US politics, 1890–1920. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4): 755–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. & Rogers, J. (1995) Associations and Democracy. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Creed, W. E. D., Scully, M. A. & Austin, J. R. (2002) Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13(5): 475–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dacin, M. T. & Dacin, P. A. (2008) Traditions as institutionalized practices: implications for deinstitutionalization. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 327–351. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Certeau, M. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Soto, H. (1989) The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dees, G. (1998) The meaning of social entrepreneurship. www.fuqua.duke.edu/centers/case/documents/dees_SE.pdf. Accessed on February 2, 2009.
DiMaggio, J. (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Zucker, L. G. (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, pp. 3–22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. (1991) Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920–1940. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 267–292. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F. (2001) Why the economy reflects the polity: early rail policy in Britain, France, and the United States. In Granovetter, M. & Swedberg, R. (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life, 2nd edn., pp. 401–424. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. (2006a) The big push déjà vu: a review of Jeffrey Sachs's The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1): 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W. (2006b) The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. & Sutton, R. I. (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: a marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 699–738.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998) What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103: 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N. (1996) Markets as politics: a political cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4): 656–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N. (1997) Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40: 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N. (2001) Social skill and the theory of the fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2): 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, N. & Mara-Drita, I. (1996) How to make a market: reflections on the European Union's single market program. American Journal of Sociology, 102: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, vol. I. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Friedland, R. & Alford, R. R. (1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 232–263. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Jain, S. & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 196–214.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. (1982) Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1963) Peddlers and Princes: Social Development and Economic Change in Two Indonesian Towns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R. & Suddaby, R. (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. & Hinings, C. R. (2002) Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 58–80.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1973) Peasants and politics. Journal of Peasant Studies, 1(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, P. (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3): 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, D. & Shepherd, A. (2003) Conceptualizing chronic poverty. World Development, 31(3): 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepperson, R. L. (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalization. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 143–163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Khan, F. R., Munir, K. A. & Willmott, H. (2007) A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organization Studies, 28(7): 1055–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, T. & Palepu, K. (2000) The future of business groups in emerging markets: long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 268–285.Google Scholar
Kraatz, M. S. & Block, E. S. (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 243–275. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. (2008) Power, institutions and organizations. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 170–197. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C. & Phillips, N. (2002) Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: the emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Managament Journal, 45(1): 281–290.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. & Suddaby, R. (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S., Nord, W. R. & Lawrence, T. B. (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 215–254. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A. & King, T. (1991) Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: an organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3): 333–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leca, B. & Naccache, P. (2006) A critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship. Organization, 13(5): 627–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leff, N. (1978) Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: the economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26: 661–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1967) The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M. & Hirsch, P. M. (2003) Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1: 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, S., Hardy, C. & Lawrence, T. B. (2004) Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 657–679.Google Scholar
Mahbub, A. & Ahmed, S. M. (1997) Perspective of women about their own illness. Dhaka: BRAC-ICDDR, B Joint Research Project: Working paper number 16.
Mair, J. & Martí, I. (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41: 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, J. & Martí, I. (In press) Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: a case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing.
Mair, J., Martí, I. & Ganly, K. (2007) Social entrepreneurship: seeing institutional voids as spaces of opportunity. European Business Forum, 31(Winter): 34–39.Google Scholar
Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. P. (2003) Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. (1987) Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Narayan-Parker, D. (2000) Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us?New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. (1992) The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4): 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. L. (2005) Organizational scholarship and the eradication of global poverty. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 970–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peredo, A. M. & Chrisman, J. J. (2006) Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. W. (1991) Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 183–203. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. & Hart, S. L. (2002) The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, 26: 54–67.Google Scholar
Rao, H. (1998) Caveat emptor: the construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 103: 912–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, H., Monin, P. & Durand, R. (2005) Border crossing: bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. American Sociological Review, 70: 968–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Research and Evaluation Division (RED) (2004) Process documentation on the implementation aspects of the CFPR/TUP program. Available: www.bracresearch.org. Accessed April 10, 2008.
Riaz, A. (2005) Traditional institutions as tools of political Islam in Bangladesh. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(3): 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. (2005) The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1994) Conceptualizing institutional fields: linking organizations and societal systems. In Derlien, H.-U., Gerhardt, U. & Scharpf, F. W. (eds.), Systemrationalitat und Partialinteresse (Systems Rationality and Partial Interests), pp. 203–219. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, M. (2007) What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5: 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, E. F. (1999) Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered, 3rd edn. Vancouver: Hartley & Marks.Google Scholar
Seelos, C. & Mair, J. (2007) How social entrepreneurs enable human, social, and economic development. In Rangan, V., Quelch, J., Herrero, G. & Barton, B. (eds.), Business Solutions for the Global Poor: Creating Social and Economic Value, pp. 271–294. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Seo, M. & Creed, W. E. D. (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 3: 222–247.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H. (1992) A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, R. N. & Barley, S. R. (1996) Organizations and social systems: organization theory's neglected mandate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (eds.) (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suchman, M. (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, P. S. & Zucker, L. G. (1996) Institutionalization of institutional theory. In Clegg, S., Hardy, C. & Nord, W. (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 175–190. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wahed, T. & Bhuiya, A. (2007) Battered bodies & shattered minds: violence against women in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 126 (October): 341–354.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolford, W. (2003) Families, fields and fighting for land: the spatial dynamics of contention in rural Brazil. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 8(2): 157–172.Google Scholar
,World Bank (2001) Engendering Development: Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources, and Voice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×