Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:30:32.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Scandinavian institutionalism – a case of institutional work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

By
Eva Boxenbaum  and
Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen
Edited by
Thomas B. Lawrence ,
Roy Suddaby  and
Bernard Leca
Thomas B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Roy Suddaby
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Bernard Leca
Affiliation:
ESC Rouen
Get access

Summary

Institutional theory has witnessed a fairly successful stream of research and has witnessed a renaissance within the social sciences over the last couple of decades. This has created a diffusion of institutional theory into a number of disciplines within the social sciences and resulted in the creation of a distinction between different types of institutionalisms like economical, sociological, and historical institutionalism (Scott, 1995, 2008). A widely used distinction within institutional theory has also been a division between “old institutionalism” and “new institutionalism” (see, for example, DiMaggio & Powell, 1991; Czarniawska & Sevón, 1996; Hirsch & Lounsbury, 1997). Lately it has also become customary to talk about a particular Scandinavian approach to organization studies (e.g. Engwall, 2003; Kreiner, 2007; Olsen, 2007) and about a “Scandinavian institutionalism” as a distinctive and identifiable variant of institutionalism (e.g. Czarniawska & Sevón, 1996, 2003; Lægreid, 2007; Røvik, 2007; Greenwood, Sahlin, Oliver & Suddaby, 2008; Sahlin & Wedlin, 2008). This chapter aims at identifying and presenting the origin of what could be termed Scandinavian institutionalism and at characterizing its main features and its emerging boundaries.

In a way it seems like a paradox to claim the existence of a Scandinavian brand of institutional theory. Institutional theory emphasizes processes of isomorphism, homology, and standardization in an ever more globalized world, hence it may seem paradoxical to claim that Scandinavia has been shielded from the isomorphic pressures of prevailing institutional theory. Yet, as we will argue, Scandinavian institutionalism highlights organizational variation and distinctiveness rather than isomorphism and standardization.

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutional Work
Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations
 , pp. 178 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, J. L., Mazza, C. & Strandgaard Pedersen, J. (2005) Editorial: the role of mass media in the consumption of management knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(2): 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J. L., Mazza, C., Strandgaard Pedersen, J. & Svejenova, S. (2005) Shielding idiosyncrasy from isomorphic pressures: towards optimal distinctiveness in European filmmaking. Organization, 12: 863–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. (2003) Beyond neo-positivists, romantics, and localists: a reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(1): 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amdam, R. P., Kvålshaugen, R. & Larsen, E. (eds.) (2003) Inside the Business Schools: The Content of European Business Education. Oslo: Abstrakt–Liber–Copenhagen Business School Press.
Becker-Ritterspach, F. A. A. (2006) The social constitution of knowledge integration in MNEs: a theoretical framework. Journal of International Management, 12(3): 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boons, F. & Strannegård, L. (2000) Organizations coping with their natural environment. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(3): 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borum, F. (2004) Means–end frames and the politics and myths of organizational fields. Organization Studies, 25: 897–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borum, F. & Westenholz, A. (1995) The incorporation of multiple institutional models: organizational field multiplicity and the role of actors. In Scott, R. W. & Christensen, S. (eds.), The Institutional Construction of Organizations – International and Longitudinal Studies, pp. 113–131. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Boxenbaum, E. (2006) Lost in translation? The making of Danish diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7): 939–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxenbaum, E. (2008) The process of legitimation. In Scheuer, S. & Scheuer, J. Damm (eds.), The Anatomy of Change, pp. 239–264. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Boxenbaum, E. & Battilana, J. (2005) Importation as innovation: transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 3(4): 355–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxenbaum, E. & Jonsson, S. (2008) Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 78–98. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, N. (1989) The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decision, and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. & Jacobsson, B. (2000) A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. & Olsen, J. P. (eds.) (1993) The Reforming Organization. London: Routledge.
Brunsson, N. & Olsen, J. P. (eds.) (1998) Organizing Organizations. Bergen-Sandviken: Fagbokvorlag.
Callon, M. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief, pp. 196–233. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Callon, M. & Latour, B. (1981) Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In Knorr-Cetina, K. & Cicourel, A. V. (eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology, pp. 277–303. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Christensen, S., Karnøe, P., Strandgaard Pedersen, J. & Dobbin, F. (eds.) (1997) Actors and institutions: editors' introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4): 392–396.CrossRef
Czarniawska, B. (2008) How to misuse institutions and get away with it: some reflections on institutional theory(ies). In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 769–782. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarniawska, B. & Joerges, B. (1996) Travels of ideas. In Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (eds.), Translating Organizational Change, pp. 13–47. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (eds.) (1996) Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRef
Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (eds.) (2003) The Northern Lights: Organization Theory in Scandinavia. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (2005) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Malmö: Liber; Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Dacin, T., Goodstein, J. & Scott, W. R. (2002) Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1991) Introduction. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Djelic, M.-L. & Quack, S. (2003) Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engwall, L. (1995) The Vikings vs. the world: an examination of Nordic business research. Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Business Studies, 1: 303–312.Google Scholar
Engwall, L. (2003) On the origin of the Northern Lights. In Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (eds.), The Northern Lights: Organization Theory in Scandinavia, pp. 395–411. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Forssell, A. & Jansson, D. (2000) Idéer som Fängslar. Recept för en Offentlig Reformation [Ideas that Imprison: A Recipe for Reform of Public Management]. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (2008) Introduction. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 1–46. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hallett, T. & Ventresca, M. (2006) How institutions form: loose coupling as mechanism in Gouldner's Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7): 908–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 183–202. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P. & Lounsbury, M. (1997) Ending the family quarrel: toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4): 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, P. (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, R. (2002) Nyinstitutionalismen inom Organisationsanalysen [New Institutionalism within Organizational Analysis]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Kreiner, K. (2007) A Scandinavian way in organization theory: what is the evidence, and does evidence matter?Nordiske Organisasjionsstudier 9(1): 83–92.Google Scholar
Lægreid, P. (2007) Organization theory – the Scandinavian way. Nordiske Organisasjionsstudier, 9(1): 77–82.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1986) The power of association. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief, pp. 164–280. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. & Suddaby, R. (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. & Nord, W. R. (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd edn., pp. 215–254. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leca, B., Battilana, J. & Boxenbaum, E. (2006) Taking stock on institutional entrepreneurship: what do we know? Where do we go? Online working paper at Copenhagen Business School. Available at http://ir.lib.cbs.dk/paper/ISBN/x65651767x.
Lervik, J. E., Hennestad, B. W., Amdam, R. P., Lunnan, R. & Nilsen, S. M. (2005) Implementing human resource development best practices: replication or re-creation?Human Resource Development International, 8(3): 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi, A. (2000) One theory, many practices: institutional allomorphism in the managerialist reorganization of Italian governments. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 16: 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1976; 1979) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions – The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mazza, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K. & Strandgaard Pedersen, J. (2005) European constructions of an American model. Journal of Management Learning, 36(4): 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R. (2008) New sociology of knowledge: historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 519–538. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. P. (2007) Organization theory, public administration, democratic governance. Nordiske Organisasjionsstudier, 9(1): 93–110.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (eds.) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Røvik, K. A. (1996) Deinstitutionalization and the logic of fashion. In Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (eds.), Translating Organizational Change, pp. 139–172. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Røvik, K. A. (1998) Moderne Organisasjoner: Trender i Organisasjonstenkningen ved Tusenårsskiftet [Modern organizations: trends in organizational research by millennium]. Bergen-Sandviken: Fakboklaget.Google Scholar
Røvik, K. A. (2007) Trender og Translasjoner – Ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon [Trends and translations – ideas that shape the organization of the 21st century]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Sahlin, K. & Wedlin, L. (2008) Circulating ideas: imitation, translation and editing. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 218–242. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996) Imitating by editing success: the construction of organizational fields and identities. In Czarniawska, B. & Sevón, G. (eds.), Translating Organizational Change, pp. 69–92. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2001) National, international and transnational constructions of new public management. In Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (eds.), New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, pp. 43–72. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sahlin-Andersson, K. & Engwall, L. (2002) The Expansion of Management Knowledge – Carriers, Flows and Sources. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlin-Andersson, K. & Söderholm, A. (2002) The Scandinavian school of studies. In Sahlin-Andersson, K. & Söderholm, A. (eds.), Beyond Project Management: New Perspectives on the Temporary–Permanent Dilemma. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1995/2001/2008) Institutions and Organizations, 1st, 2nd, 3rd edns. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. & Christensen, S. (1995) The Institutional Construction of Organizations – International and Longitudinal Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Strandgaard Pedersen, J. & Dobbin, F. (1997) The social invention of collective actors: on the rise of the organization. American Behavioral Scientist, 40: 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strandgaard Pedersen, J. & Dobbin, F. (2006) In search of identity and legitimation – bridging organizational culture and neo-institutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49: 897–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strandgaard Pedersen, J., Svejenova, S. & Jones, C. (2006) Editorial, special issue: Transforming creative industries: strategies of and structures around creative entrepreneurs. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(3): 221–223.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2001) Making Sense of the Organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Westenholz, A., Strandgaard Pedersen, J. & Dobbin, F. (2006) Introduction. Institutions in the making: identity, power, and the emergence of new organizational forums. American Behavioral Scientist, 49: 889–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×