Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Fundamentals
- 2 Theories and Their Conditional Implications
- 3 Interaction Model Specification
- 4 Interpreting Quantities of Interest
- 5 Three Substantive Applications
- Part II More Complex Forms of Conditionality
- 6 When We Have More Than One Modifying Variable
- 7 When an Independent Variable Interacts with Itself
- Part III Interactions and Limited Dependent Variables
- 8 Interactions and Dichotomous Dependent Variables
- 9 Interactions and Ordered Dependent Variables
- 10 Interactions and Unordered Dependent Variables
- Appendix A Basic Properties of Variances
- Appendix B Marginal Effects and Variances for Various Linear-Interactive Models
- Appendix C Calculating the Smallest Standard Error for the Marginal Effect of X on Y
- Appendix D Calculating the Values of the Modifying Variable Z at which the Bounds of the Confidence Interval for the Marginal Effect of X Equal 0
- References
- Solutions
- Alphabetical Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2023
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Fundamentals
- 2 Theories and Their Conditional Implications
- 3 Interaction Model Specification
- 4 Interpreting Quantities of Interest
- 5 Three Substantive Applications
- Part II More Complex Forms of Conditionality
- 6 When We Have More Than One Modifying Variable
- 7 When an Independent Variable Interacts with Itself
- Part III Interactions and Limited Dependent Variables
- 8 Interactions and Dichotomous Dependent Variables
- 9 Interactions and Ordered Dependent Variables
- 10 Interactions and Unordered Dependent Variables
- Appendix A Basic Properties of Variances
- Appendix B Marginal Effects and Variances for Various Linear-Interactive Models
- Appendix C Calculating the Smallest Standard Error for the Marginal Effect of X on Y
- Appendix D Calculating the Values of the Modifying Variable Z at which the Bounds of the Confidence Interval for the Marginal Effect of X Equal 0
- References
- Solutions
- Alphabetical Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interaction ModelsSpecification and Interpretation, pp. 506 - 523Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Adams, James F., Merrill, Samuel and Grofman, Bernard. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence and Glasgow, Garrett. 2006. “Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3):513–529.Google Scholar
Ai, Chunrong and Norton, Edward C.. 2003. “Interaction terms in logit and probit models.” Economic Letters 80(1):123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aidt, Toke S. and Dallal, Bianca. 2008. “Female voting power: The contribution of women’s suffrage to the growth of social spending in Western Europe (1869–1960).” Public Choice 134(3–4):132–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, Leona and West, Stephen. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ajrouch, Kristine J., Blandon, Alysia Y. and Antonucci, Toni C.. 2005. “Social networks among men and women: The effects of age and socioeconomic status.” Journal of Gerontology 60B(6):S313–S317.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Stan L., Chadwick, Bruce A. and Alcorn, David S.. 1977. “Religiosity and deviance: Application of an attitude-behavior contingent consistent model.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 16(3):263–274.Google Scholar
Alexander, Deborah and Andersen, Kristi. 1986. “Gender as a factor in the attribution of leadership traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46(3):527–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alilunas, Peter. 2011. “The (in)visible people in the room: Men in women’s studies.” Men and Masculinities 14(2):210–229.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “When politics and models collide: Estimating models of multiparty elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American National Election Studies. 2014. “User’s Guide and Codebook for the ANES 2012 Time Series Study.” Release Date: May 2016. Ann Arbor, MI and Palo Alto, CA: The University of Michigan and Stanford University.Google Scholar
American National Election Studies. 2019. “The American National Election Study (ANES) 2016 Time Series Study.” Release Date: September 2019. Version 20190904. Ann Arbor, MI: American National Election Studies.Google Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio and Cox, Gary W.. 1997. “Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41:149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Carol. 2018. One Person, No Vote: How Voter Suppression Is Destroying Our Democracy. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Snyder, James M.. 2000. “Valence politics and equilibrium in spatial election models.” Public Choice 103:327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann and Plutzer, Eric. 1993. “Contextual determinants of feminist attitudes: National and subnational influences in Western Europe.” American Political Science Review 87(1):145–157.Google Scholar
Banks, Antoine J. and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2012. “Emotional substrates of white racial attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 56(2):286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Raoul M. and Kenny, David A.. 1986. “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105(6):1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel and Jackman, Simon. 1998. “Beyond linearity by default: Generalized additive models.” American Journal of Political Science 42(2):596–627.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, King, Gary and Zeng, Langche. 2000. “Improving quantitative studies of international conflict: A conjecture.” American Political Science Review 94(1):21–35.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen and Baldez, Lisa. 2007. “Intersectionality.” Politics & Gender 3(2):229–232.Google Scholar
Bernard, Jessie. 1974. “Age, sex, and feminism.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 415:120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R. and Esarey, Justin. 2010. “Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential?” American Journal of Political Science 54(1):248–266.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Golder, Matt and Milton, Daniel. 2012. “Improving tests of theories positing interaction.” Journal of Politics 74(3):653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block, Ray and Golder, Matt. 2023. “Is there a substantive–descriptive representation trade-off?” Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Block, Ray, Golder, Matt and Golder, Sona. 2023. “Evaluating claims of intersectionality.” Journal of Politics 85(3):795–811.Google Scholar
Bock, Jarrod, Byrd-Craven, Jennifer and Burkley, Melissa. 2017. “The role of sexism in voting in the 2016 presidential election.” Personality and Individual Differences 119:189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine and Myers, Daniel J.. 2004. “Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces 83(2):759–790.Google Scholar
Bowen, Harry P. 2012. “Testing moderating hypotheses in limited dependent variable and other nonlinear models: Secondary versus total interactions.” Journal of Management 38(3):860–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Jones, Bradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., De Boef, Suzanna and Lin, Tse-Min. 2004. “The dynamics of the partisan gender gap.” American Political Science Review 98(3):515–528.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses.” Political Analysis 14(1):63–82.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear. 2004. “Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms.” International Organization 58:807–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo-Ortega, Claudio, Eterovic, Nicolas A. and Paredes, Valentina. 2018. “What do women want? Female suffrage and the size of government.” Economic Systems 42:132–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian and Farlie, Dennis J.. 1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith and Tanenbaum, Eric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burkett, Stephen R. and White, Mervin. 1974. “Hellfire and delinquency: Another look.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 13:455–462.Google Scholar
Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2000. “Aid, policies, and growth.” American Economic Review 90(4):847–868.Google Scholar
Cai, Weiyi and Clement, Scott. 2016. “What Americans think of feminism today.” The Washington Post, January 27.Google Scholar
Calasanti, Toni and Slevin, Kathleen F., eds. 2006. Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calasanti, Toni M. and Slevin, Kathleen F.. 2001. Gender, Social Inequalities, and Aging. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
Calasanti, Toni, Slevin, Kathleen F. and King, Neal. 2006. “Ageism and feminism: From ‘et cetera’ to center.” NWSA Journal 18(1):13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin and Trivedi, Pravin K.. 2004. Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin and Trivedi, Pravin K.. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Rosie. 2004. “Gender, ideology, and issue preference: Is there such a thing as a political women’s interest in Britain?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6:20–44.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C. 2017. “Why Donald Trump never really had a ‘woman’ problem among Republican voters.” LSE US Centre [blog], January 26.Google Scholar
Cassese, Erin C. and Barnes, Tiffany D.. 2019. “Reconciling sexism and women’s support for Republican candidates: A look at gender, class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 presidential races.” Political Behavior 41(3):677–700.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, Matias D., Idrobo, Nicolás and Titiunik, Rocío. 2020. A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, Tiago V. De V. and Tavares, José. 2011. “Women prefer larger governments: Growth, structural transformation, and government size.” Economic Inquiry 49(1):155–171.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna and Krook, Mona Lena. 2014. “Constituting women’s interests through representative claims.” Politics & Gender 10:149–174.Google Scholar
Chaney, Carole Kennedy, Alvarez, R. Michael and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “Explaining the gender gap in US presidential elections 1980–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51(2):311–339.Google Scholar
Cho, Sumi, Crenshaw, Kimberlé and McCall, Leslie. 2013. “Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38(4):785–810.Google Scholar
Clark, William Roberts. 2003. Capitalism, Not Globalism: Capital Mobility, Central Bank Independence, and the Political Control of the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Clark, William Roberts and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Rehabilitating Duverger’s theory: Testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws.” Comparative Political Studies 39:163–192.Google Scholar
Clark, William Roberts, Gilligan, Michael and Golder, Matt. 2006. “A simple multivariate test for asymmetric hypotheses.” Political Analysis 14(3):311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Dov, Shin, Faith, Liu, Xi, Ondish, Peter and Kraus, Michael W.. 2017. “Defining social class across time and between groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 43(11):1530–1545.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela J. and Sapiro, Virginia. 1993. “Gender, feminist consciousness, and war.” American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1079–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth A., Jelen, Ted G. and Wilcox, Clyde. 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, Charles, Golder, Matt, Gschwend, Thomas and Indriðason, Indriði H.. 2020. “It’s not only what you say, it’s also how you say it: The strategic use of campaign sentiment.” Journal of Politics 82(3): 1044–1060.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist policies.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1:139–167.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color.” Stanford Law Review 43(6):1241–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Lauren. 2018. Politics Beyond Black and White: Biracial Identity and Attitudes in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Lauren. 2020. “The fluidity of racial classifications.” Annual Review of Political Science 23:221–240.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathy and Zarkov, Dubravka. 2017. “EJWS retrospective on intersectionality.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 24(4):313–320.Google Scholar
Davis, Nancy J. and Robinson, Robert V.. 1991. “Men’s and women’s consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States.” American Sociological Review 56(1):72–84.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 1995. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 2001. Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African-American Political Ideologies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dhima, Kostanca. 2022. “Reexamining the supply and demand framework for explaining women’s legislative representation.” Unpublished manuscript, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Dhima, Kostanca. 2022. “Women’s legislative representation: Supply, mass and elite demand, and regime type.” Unpublished manuscript, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2016. “Watching election 2016 with a gender lens.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49(4):807–812.Google Scholar
D’Orazio, Vito, Landis, Steven T., Palmer, Glenn and Schrodt, Philip. 2014. “Separating the wheat from the chaff: Applications of automated document classification using support vector machines.” Political Analysis 22(2):224–242.Google Scholar
Döring, Holger and Manow, Philip. 2015. “Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections, and cabinets in modern democracies.” www.parlgov.org/.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (Edited by Lukes, Steven). 2003/1895. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. and Karau, Steven J.. 2002. “Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.” Psychological Review 109(3): 573–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, Alice H., Wood, Wendy and Diekman, Amanda B.. 2000. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, ed. Eckes, Thomas and Trautner, Hanns M.. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum pp. 123–174.Google Scholar
Edlund, Lena and Pande, Rohini. 2002. “Why have women become left-wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVII(3):917–961.Google Scholar
Efron, Bradley and Tibshirani, Robert J., eds. 1994. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard. 2003. “Gender differences in attitudes toward the use of force by the United States, 1990–2003.” International Security 28(1):10–141.Google Scholar
Epstein, David L., Bates, Robert, Goldstone, Jack, Kristensen, Ida and O’Halloran, Sharyn. 2006. “Democratic transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3):551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eviatar, Daphne. 2003. “Do aid studies govern policies or reflect them?” New York Times, July 26.Google Scholar
EVS. 2015. “European Values Survey Longitudinal Data File 1981–2018 (EVS 1981–2008).” GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4804 Data File Version 3.0.0.Google Scholar
Falk, Erika and Kenski, Kate. 2006. “Issue saliency and gender stereotypes: Support for women as presidents in times of war and terrorism.” Social Science Quarterly 87(1):1–18.Google Scholar
Fazio, Russell H. and Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R.. 1994. Acting as we feel: When and how attitudes guide behavior. In Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives, ed. Shavitt, Sharon and Brock, Timothy C.. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon pp. 71–147.Google Scholar
Ferland, Benjamin. 2018. “The alternative specification of interaction models with a discrete modifying variable.” The Political Methodologist, February 12. https://polmeth.orgGoogle Scholar
Ferland, Benjamin and Golder, Matt. 2021. Citizen representation and electoral systems. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press (online only).Google Scholar
Feuersänger, Christian. 2010. “Manual for Package PGFPLOTS.” http://pgfplots.sourceforge.net/.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. Marcus. 1962. “Domestic financial policies under fixed and floating exchange rates.” IMF Staff Papers 9(3):369–380.Google Scholar
Frasure-Yokley, Lorrie. 2018. “Choosing the velvet glove: Women voters, ambivalent sexism, and vote choice in 2016.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 3(1):3–25.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Robert. 1982. “In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 797–833.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer and Przeworski, Adam. 2006. “Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships.” Economics and Politics 18: 174–204.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and Stern, Hal. 2006. “The difference between ‘significant’ and ‘not significant’ is not itself statistically significant.” The American Statistician 60(4):328–331.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Andra and Brown, Nadia E.. 2019. “#BlackGirlMagic demystified: Black women as voters, partisans and political actors.” Phylon 56(2):37–58.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, ed. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glasgow, Garrett. 2001. “Mixed logit models for multiparty elections.” Political Analysis 9:116–136.Google Scholar
Glasgow, Garrett. 2022. Interpreting Discrete Choice Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, Garrett, Golder, Matt and Golder, Sona N.. 2011. “Who ‘wins’? Determining the party of the prime minister.” American Journal of Political Science 55(4):937–954.Google Scholar
Glasgow, Garrett, Golder, Matt and Golder, Sona N.. 2012. “New empirical strategies for the study of parliamentary government formation.” Political Analysis 20:248–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Matt. 2010. “Ideological congruence and electoral institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54(1):90–106.Google Scholar
Golder, Matt. 2016. “Far right parties in Europe.” Annual Review of Political Science 19:477–497.Google Scholar
Golder, Sona N. 2006 a. “Pre-electoral coalition formation in parliamentary democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 36:193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Sona N. 2006 b. The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Goldfeld, Stephen M. and Quandt, Richard E.. 1973. “The estimation of structural shifts by switching regressions.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 2(4):475–485.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Jessica, Grossman, Guy and Robinson, Amanda Lea. 2018. “Do men and women have different policy preferences in Africa? Determinants and implications of gender gaps in policy prioritization.” British Journal of Political Science 48(3):611–636.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Kern, Holger L.. 2012. “Modeling heterogenous treatment effects in survey experiments with Bayesian additive regression trees.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3):491–511.Google Scholar
Greene, William H., ed. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gross, S. J. and Niman, C. M.. 1975. “Attitude behavior consistency: A review.” Public Opinion Quarterly 39(3):358–368.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens and Hazlett, Chad. 2014. “Kernell regularized least squares: Reducing misspecification bias with a flexible and interpretable machine learning approach.” Political Analysis 22(2): 143–168.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Mummolo, Jonathan and Zu, Yiqing. 2019. “How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice.” Political Analysis 27(2): 679–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5(1):63–79.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2016. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanmer, Michael J. and Kalkan, Kerem Ozan. 2013. “Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1):263–277.Google Scholar
Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani, Robert. 1986. “Generalized additive models.” Statistical Science 1(3):297–318.Google Scholar
Hastie, Trevor, Tibshirani, Robert and Friedman, Jerome. 2017. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bernadette. 1997. “Gender, feminism, and electoral behavior in Britain.” Electoral Studies 16(2):203–216.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony Francis, Jowell, Roger, Curtice, John Kevin, Brand, A. and Mitchell, James C.. 1993. “British General Election Study 1992.” Cross-Section Survey [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], April 1993.Google Scholar
Higgins, Paul C. and Albrecht, Gary L.. 1977. “Hellfire and delinquency revisited.” Social Forces 55(4):952–958.Google Scholar
Hirschi, Travis and Stark, Rodney. 1969. “Hellfire and delinquency.” Social Problems 17(1):202–213.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Merolla, Jennifer L. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2016. “Terrorist threat, male stereotypes, and candidate evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly 69(1):134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Juliana Menasce and Fetterolf, Janell. 2020. “Worldwide optimism about future of gender equality, even as many see advantages for men.” Pew Research Center, April 30. www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/04/30/worldwide-optimism-about-future-of-gender-equality-even-as-many-see-advantages-for-men/Google Scholar
Huber, Joan and Spitze, Glenna. 1983. Sex Stratification: Children, Housework, and Jobs. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Huber, Lindsay Perez. 2016. “Make America great again: Donald Trump, racist nativism and the virulent adherence to White supremacy amid US demographic change.” Charleston Law Review 10:215–248.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office.” Political Research Quarterly 46(3):503–525.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Cassese, Erin and Lizotte, Mary-Kate. 2012. Gender, public opinion, and political reasoning. In Political Women and American Democracy, ed. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen and Baldez, Lisa. New York: Cambridge University Press pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., Paxton, Pamela, Clayton, Amanda and Zetterberg, Pär. 2017. “Quota Adoption and Reform Over Time (QAROT), 1947–2015.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017-08-16. https://doi.org/10.3886/E100918V1.Google Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., Paxton, Pamela, Clayton, Amanda and Zetterberg, Pär. 2019. “Global gender quota adoption, implementation, and reform.” Comparative Politics 51(2):219–238.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. “Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies.” American Political Science Review 105(4):765–789.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2000. “The developmental theory of the gender gap: Women’s and men’s voting behavior in global perspective.” International Political Science Review 21(4):441–463.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2019. “Women in National Parliaments.” Data available from World Bank Indicators at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SG.GEN.PARL.ZS.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torbern and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2006. “The political economy of gender: Explaining cross-national variation in the gender division of labor and the gender voting gap.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1):1–19.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted, Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. 1994. “The gender gap in comparative perspective: Gender differences in abstract ideology and concrete issues in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 25(2):171–186.Google Scholar
Jerolmack, Colin and Khan, Shamus. 2014. “Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy.” Sociological Methods & Research 43(2):178–209.Google Scholar
Jordan-Zachary, Julia. 2003. “The female bogeyman: Political implications of criminalizing black women.” Souls 5(2):42–62.Google Scholar
Junn, Jane. 2017. “The Trump majority: White womanhood and the making of female voters in the US.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5(2):343–352.Google Scholar
Junn, Jane and Masuoka, Natalie. 2020. “The gender gap is a race gap: Women voters in US presidential elections.” Perspectives on Politics 18(4):1135–1145.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. and Franzese, Robert J.. 2007. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert L., ed. 2019. Interaction Effects in Linear and Generalized Linear Models: Examples and Applications using Stata. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Karen M. and Petrocik, John R.. 1999. “The changing politics of American men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43(3):864–887.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke. 2008. Semiparametric Regression for the Social Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wily & Sons.Google Scholar
King, Gary, ed. 2001. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary and Zeng, Langche. 2006. “The dangers of extreme counterfactuals.” Political Analysis 14(2):131–159.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2):341–355.Google Scholar
Klein, Ethel. 1985. “The gender gap: Different issues, different answers.” The Brookings Review 3:33–37.Google Scholar
Koch, Michael T. and Fulton, Sarah A.. 2011. “In the defense of women: Gender, office holding, and national security policy in established democracies.” Journal of Politics 73(1):1–16.Google Scholar
Koenig, Anne M., Eagly, Alice H., Mitchell, Abigail A. and Ristikari, Riina. 2011. “Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms.” Psychological Bulletin 137(4):616–642.Google Scholar
Kramer, Betty J. and Thompson, Edward H., eds. 2002. Men as Caregivers: Theory, Research, and Service Implications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Krinsky, Itzhak and Robb, A. Leslie. 1986. “On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4):715–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era.” Political Research Quarterly 53(3):479–490.Google Scholar
Lewis, Angela K. 2013. Conservatism in the Black Community: To the Right and Misunderstood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, ed. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindh, Arvid and McCall, Leslie. 2020. “Class position and political opinion in rich democracies.” Annual Review of Sociology 46: 419–441.Google Scholar
Long, J. Scott, ed. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lott, John R. Jr. and Kenny, Lawrence W.. 1999. “Did women’s suffrage change the size and scope of government?” Journal of Political Economy 107(6):1163–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, David P. 2008. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1985. “Myth and reality: The ERA and the gender gap in the 1980 election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49:164–178.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. “Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’.” Journal of Politics 61:628–657.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev. 1998. “Realist and cultural critiques of the democratic peace: A theoretical and empirical re-assessment.” International Interactions 24(1):3–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert and Jaggers, Keith. 2019. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2018, Dataset Users’ Manual.” www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 2005. Enhancing women’s political representation: Legislative recruitment and electoral systems. In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, A Revised Edition, ed. Ballington, Julie and Karam, Azza. Stockholm: International IDEA Publications pp. 93–111.Google Scholar
Mayeri, Serena, Brown, Ryan, Persily, Nathaniel and Kim, Son-Ho. 2008. Gender equality. In Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy, ed. Persily, Nathaniel, Citrin, Jack and Egan, Patrick J.. New York: Oxford University Press pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie. 2005. “The complexity of intersectionality.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(3):1771–1800.Google Scholar
McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth. 2000. “Mixed MNL models of discrete response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 15:447–470.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jacob M. and Olivella, Santiago. 2018. “Tree-based models for political science data.” American Journal of Political Science 62(3):729–744.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mundell, Robert A. 1963. “Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates.” Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science 29(4):475–485.Google Scholar
Nagler, Jonathan. 1991. “The effect of registration laws and education on US voter turnout.” American Political Science Review 85(4): 1393–1405.Google Scholar
Nagler, Jonathan. 1994. “Scobit: An alternative estimator to logit and probit.” American Journal of Political Science 38(1):230–255.Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A. and Wedderburn, R. W. M.. 1972. “Generalized linear models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 135: 370–384.Google Scholar
Nellis, Ashley. 2016. “The color of justice: Racial and ethnic disparity in state prisons.” The Sentencing Project, October 13. www.sentencingproject.org/reports/the-color-of-justice-racial-and-ethnic-disparity-in-state-prisons-the-sentencing-project/.Google Scholar
Newman, Benjamin J., Shah, Sono and Collingwood, Loren. 2018. “Race, place, and building a base: Latino population growth and the nascent Trump campaign for president.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(1):122–134.Google Scholar
Newman, Benjamin, Merolla, Jennifer L., Shah, Sono, Lemi, Danielle Casarez, Collingwood, Loren and Ramakrishnan, S. Karthik. 2021. “The Trump effect: An experimental investigation of the emboldening effect of racially inflammatory communication.” British Journal of Political Science 51(3):1138–1159.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1996 a. “Mobilising the ‘women’s vote’: The gender-generation gap in voting behavior.” Parliamentary Affairs 49(2): 333–342.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1996 b. “Women politicians: Legislative recruitment in advanced democracies.” Parliamentary Affairs 49(1):89–102.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1999. Gender: A gender-generation gap? In Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective, ed. Evans, Geoffrey and Norris, Pippa. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2001. The gender gap: Old challenges, new approaches. In Women and American Politics: Agenda Setting for the 21st Century, ed. Carroll, Susan J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1989. “Women candidates for parliament: Transforming the agenda?” British Journal of Political Science 19(1):106–115.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1993. “‘If only more candidates came forward’: Supply-side explanations of candidate selection in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 23(3):373–408.Google Scholar
Norton, Edward C., Wang, Hua and Ai, Chunrong. 2004. “Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models.” The Stata Journal 4(2):154–167.Google Scholar
Oehlert, Gary W. 1992. “A note on the delta method.” The American Statistician 46(1):27–29.Google Scholar
Oneal, John R. and Russett, Bruce M.. 1997. “The classic liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2):267–294.Google Scholar
Pampel, Fred. 2011. “Cohort changes in the socio-demographic determinants of gender egalitarianism.” Social Forces 89(3):961–982.Google Scholar
Parker, Christopher. 2016. “Race and politics in the age of Obama.” Annual Review of Sociology 42:217–230.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Kunovich, Sheri and Hughes, Melanie M.. 2007. “Gender in politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 33:263–84.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, James W., Booth, Roger J. and Francis, Martha E.. 2007. “Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC [Computer software]. Austin, TX: [Operator’s manual].”Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1998. The Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity, and Race. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2014. The Price of the Ticket: Barack Obama and the Rise and Decline of Black Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 1988. “Work life, family life, and women’s support of feminism.” American Sociological Review 853(4):640–649.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quinlan, J. R. 1986. “Induction of decision trees.” Machine Learning 1(1):81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, Carlisle. 2016. “Compression and conditional effects: A product term is essential when using a logistic regression to test for interaction.” Political Science Research and Methods 4(3):621–639.Google Scholar
Regan, Patrick M. and Paskeviciute, Aida. 2003. “Women’s access to politics and peaceful states.” Journal of Peace Research 40(3): 287–302.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth and Swers, Michele. 2011. “An endogenous approach to women’s interests: When interests are interesting in and of themselves.” Politics & Gender 7(3):429–435.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth, Haynie, Kerry L. and Widner, Kirsten. 2020. Race, Gender, and Political Representation: Toward a More Intersectional Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodebeck, Laurie A. 1996. “The structure of men’s and women’s feminist orientations: Feminist identity and feminist opinion.” Gender & Society 10(4):386–403.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Albert Lewis and Reiss, Albert J.. 1970. “The ‘religious factor’ and delinquent behavior.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 7:83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigueur, Leah Wright. 2014. The Loneliness of the Black Republican: Pragmatic Politics and the Pursuit of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1982. “The two-party system and Duverger’s law: An essay on the history of political science.” American Political Science Review 76:752–766.Google Scholar
Saperstein, Aliya and Penner, Andrew M.. 2012. “Racial fluidity and inequality in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 118(3):676–727.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “Research frontier essay: When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women.” American Political Science Review 75:701–716.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F., MacWilliams, Matthew and Nteta, Tatishe. 2018. “Understanding White polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism.” Political Science Quarterly 133(1):9–34.Google Scholar
Schenker, Nathaniel and Gentleman, Jane F.. 2001. “On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals.” The American Statistician 55:182–186.Google Scholar
Schofield, Norman J. 2003. “Valence competition in the spatial stochastic model.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(4):371–383.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard and Johnson, Michael P.. 1976. “Attitudes and behavior.” Annual Review of Sociology 2:161–207.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Hermann. 1873. “Communication.” Archives des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles 48:38–44.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y. and Mahajan, Harpreet. 1986. “Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50(1):42–61.Google Scholar
Simon, Rita J. and Landis, Jean M.. 1989. “A report: Women’s and men’s attitudes about a woman’s role and place.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53(2):265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Preston H. 2018. “Self-help,” Black conservatives, and the reemergence of Black privatism. In Without Justice for All: The New Liberalism and Our Retreat from Racial Equality, ed. Reed, Adolph. London: Routledge pp. 257–289.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney. 1996. “Religion as context: Hellfire and delinquency one more time.” Sociology of Religion 57(2):163–173.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney, Kent, Lori and Doyle, Daniel P.. 1982. “Religion and delinquency: The ecology of a ‘lost’ relationship.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 19(1):4–24.Google Scholar
Stockemer, Daniel. 2011. “Women’s parliamentary representation in Africa: The impact of democracy and corruption on the number of female deputies in national parliaments.” Political Studies 59: 693–712.Google Scholar
Stolper, W. F. and Samuelson, Paul A.. 1941. “Protection and real wages.” Review of Economic Studies 9(1):58–73.Google Scholar
Subramanian, Ram, Riley, Kristi and Mai, Chris. 2018. “Divided Justice: Trends in Black and White jail incarceration 1990–2013.” Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Swain, Randall D. 2018. “Negative Black stereotypes, support for excessive use of force by police, and voter preference for Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential primary election cycle.” Journal of African American Studies 22:109–124.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L., ed. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein. 1998 a. “Effective magnitude and effective threshold.” Electoral Studies 17:393–404.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein. 1998 b. “Nationwide inclusion and exclusion thresholds of representation.” Electoral Studies 17:405–417.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M. and Geva, Nehemia. Forthcoming. Mental templates of leaders – do they include women? In Women in Government: An Experimental Study of Attitudes about Governing Ability, ed. Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M. and Geva, Nehemia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward H. 2000. Gendered caregiving of husbands and sons. In Intersections of Aging: Readings in Social Gerontology, ed. Markson, Elizabeth W. and Hollis-Sawyer, Lisa A.. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company pp. 333–344.Google Scholar
Tillery, Alvin B. 2019. Obama’s legacy for race relations. In The Obama Legacy, ed. Rockman, Bert A. and Rudalevige, Andrew. London: Routledge pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Barbara. 2013. “To tell the truth and not get trapped: Desire, distance, and intersectionality at the scene of argument.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38(4):993–1017.Google Scholar
Train, Kenneth E. 1998. “Recreation demand models with taste differences over people.” Land Economics 74:230–239.Google Scholar
Train, Kenneth E. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Second Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari and Kang, Alice. 2008. “The global impact of quotas on the fast track to increased female legislative representation.” Comparative Political Studies 41(3):338–361.Google Scholar
Valdini, Melody Eiils. 2019. The Inclusion Calculation: Why Men Appropriate Women’s Representation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valdini, Melody Ellis. 2012. “A deterrent to diversity: The conditional effect of electoral rules on the nomination of women candidates.” Electoral Studies 31:740–749.Google Scholar
Vapnik, Vladimir N. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ver Hoef, Jay M. 2012. “Who invented the delta method?” The American Statistician 66(2):124–127.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2000. “Testing the politics of presence: Women’s representation in the Swedish Riksdag.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23(1):67–91.Google Scholar
Warner, Leah H. 2007. “A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research.” Sex Roles 59:454–463.Google Scholar
Weaver, Vesla M. 2010. “Political consequences of the carceral state.” American Political Science Review 104(4):817–833.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. “The structure of intersectionality: A comparative politics of gender.” Sex Roles 2(2):235–248.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2011. “Perspective against interests: Sketch of a feminist political theory of women.” Politic & Gender 7(3):441–446.Google Scholar
Williams, Vanessa. 2017. “What’s wrong with White women voters? Here’s the problem with that question.” Washington Post, December 22.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2017. “World Development Indicators.” Washington, DC: The World Bank, https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald. 1976. “Linear models for evaluating conditional relationships.” American Journal of Political Science 2:349–373.Google Scholar
WVS. 2015. “World Values Survey 1981–2015 Official Aggregate v.20150418.” World Values Survey Association (www.worldvalues survey.org). Aggregate File Producer: JDSystems, Madrid.Google Scholar
Yoon, Mi Yung. 2004. “Explaining women’s legislative representation in sub-Saharan Africa.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(3):447–468.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Langche. 1999. “Prediction and classification with neural network models.” Sociological Methods and Research 27(4):499–524.Google Scholar
Zuberi, Tukufu. 2000. “Deracializing social statistics: Problems in the quantification of race.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 568:172–185.Google Scholar