Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-12T20:54:35.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - International Judicial Independence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

By
Erik Voeten
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Dunoff  and
Mark A. Pollack
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Mark A. Pollack
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Judicial independence strikes at the heart of what is different about a world with international courts (ICs). International courts have issued more than thirty thousand legally binding judgments (Alter 2013). Yet, if international judges were simply “diplomats in robes,” then these judgments would be unlikely to result in noticeable changes in the policies and practices of states, even if compliance were perfect.

There is a scholarly consensus that most international courts enjoy a degree of autonomy within a defined sphere. The literature refers to this alternately as “constrained independence” (Helfer and Slaughter 2005), “bounded discretion” (Ginsburg 2005), or the “strategic space” (Steinberg 2004) within which international judges can freely operate. There is, however, little agreement on who or what defines the bounds of this sphere or how wide it is or should be. Some argue that the effective control that states exercise over judges is so minute that international judges should properly be considered “trustees” (Majone 2001; Alter 2008). Others question the degree to which ICs do or should enjoy independence (Posner and Yoo 2005; Carrubba, Gabel, and Hankla 2008). Moreover, there are theoretical debates about why ICs acquired the independence that they did.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations
The State of the Art
 , pp. 421 - 444
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allee, Todd, and Peinhardt, Clint (2011). “Contingent Credibility: The Impact of Investment Treaty Violations on Foreign Direct Investment,” International Organization, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 401–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. (1998) “Who Are the Masters of the Treaty? European Governments and the European Court of Justice,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 125–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J (2006). “Private Litigants and the New International Courts,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J (2008). “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J (2010). “Tipping the Balance: International Courts and the Construction of International and Domestic Politics,” Working Paper No. 10–003 (Northwestern University Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies).
Alter, Karen J (2013). “The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 345–70.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Helfer, Laurence R. (2010). “Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice,” International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 563–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., Hofmann, Tobias, and Panke, Diana (2009). “Opinions, Referrals, and Judgments. Analyzing Longitudinal Patterns of Non-compliance,” Berlin Working Paper on European Integration No. 13 (Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Centre for European Integration).
Bradley, Curtis A., and Kelley, Judith G. (2008). “The Concept of International Delegation,” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter (1993). “Europe before the Court” A Political Theory of Legal Integration,” International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L. (2007). “Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade,”International Organization, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Pelc, Krzysztof J. (2010). “The Politics of Judicial Economy at the World Trade Organization,” International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L. (1995). “The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 356–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford James (2005). “Courts and Compliance in International Regulatory Regimes,” Journal of Politics, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 669–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford James (2009). “A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., Gabel, Matthew, and Hankla, Charles (2008). “Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallaro, James L., and Brewer, Stephanie Erin (2008). “Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 768–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. (2004). “Women's Rights, the European Court and Supranational Constitutionalism,” Law and Society Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. (2010). “International Courts and Democracy,” Paper prepared for presentation at the Center for Research on International and Global Studies Research Seminar, May 21, 2010 (Irvine: University of California, Irvine).
Clark, , , Tom S. (2009). “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 971–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogan, Jacob Katz (2008). “Competition and Control in International Adjudication,” Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 411–50.Google Scholar
Danner, Allison Marston (2003). “Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 510–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner, Allison Marston 2006. “When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War,” Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
Danner, Allison, and Voeten, Erik (2010). “Who Is Running the International Criminal Justice System?,” in Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K. (eds.), Who Governs the Globe? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 35–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, Shai, Levav, Jonathan, and Avnaim-Pesso, Liora (2011). “Extraneous factors in judicial decisions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Vol. 108, No. 17, pp. 6889–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dothan, Shai (2011). “Judicial Tactics on the European Court of Human Rights,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 115–42.Google Scholar
Drzemczewski, Andrew (1995). “A Major Overhaul of the European Human Rights Convention Control Mechanism: Protocol No. 11,” in Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, The Protection of Human Rights in Europe, Vol. VI, Book 2 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International), pp. 121–244.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. (2004). “Public Participation in the Trade Regime: Of Litigation, Frustration, Agitation and Legitimation,” Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 961–70.Google Scholar
Elsig, Manfred, and Pollack, Mark A. (2011). “Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: Nomination and Appointment of Judicial Candidates in the WTO Appellate Body,” Paper prepared for presentation at the 4th Annual Conference on the Political Economy of International Organizations (Zurich).
Farber, Daniel A. 2002. “Rights as Signals,” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Lars P., and Voigt, Stefan (2003). “Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross-Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators,” European Journal of Political Economy,” Vol. 19, No. 3, 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John (2002). “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law,” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1995). “The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support, and the European Court of Justice,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1998). “Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis,” British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Michael, Johns, Leslie, and Rosendorff, B. Peter (2010). “Strengthening International Courts and the Early Settlement of Disputes,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom (2005). “Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking,” Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 631–74.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. and Posner, Eric A. (2005). The Limits of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek (2004). “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law,” Duke Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 621–704.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Victor, David G., and Lupu, Yonatan (2011). “Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Haftel, Yoram Z., and Thompson, Alexander (2006). “The Independence of International Organizations: Concept and Applications,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 253–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanssen, F. Andrew (2004). “Is There a Politically Optimal Level of Judicial Independence?,” American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No, 3, pp. 712–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, and Jacoby, Wade (2010). “Partial Complaince: A Comparision of the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights,” Journal of International Law and International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 35–85.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. (2002). “Overlegalizing Human Rights: International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash against Human Rights Regimes,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 102, No. 7, pp. 1832–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. (2006). “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Theory of Constrained Independence,” in Voigt, Stefan, Albert, Max, and Schmidtchen, Dieter (eds.), International Conflict Resolution (Tubingen: Mort Siebeck), pp. 255–76.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1997). “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication,” The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 273–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2005). “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo,” California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 889–956.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney (2010). “The European Court of Human Rights, Domestic Politics and the Ties That Bind: Explaining Compliance with International Human Rights Tribunals,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, LA, February 2010.
Ikenberry, G. John (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Interights (2003). Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights, available at .
International Law Association (2004). The Burgh House Principles on the Independence of the International Judiciary, Study Group on the Practice and Procedures of International Courts and Tribunals (London: International Law Association).Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. (2004). “International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to ‘Buy Out’?” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No.1, pp. 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel (2001). “The Limits of Judicial Power: Trade-Environment Disputes in the GATT/WTO and the EU,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 622–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith (2007). “Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 573–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2000). “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 457–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict (2012). “International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order,” in James Crawford and Martti Koskenniemi (eds.), Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju (2004). “International Law as Part of Our Law,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 43–57.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Ruth, and Sands, Philippe (2003). “International Courts and Tribunals and the Independence of the International Judge,” Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 271–85.Google Scholar
Maduro, Miguel Poiares (1998). We the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico (2001). “Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance,” European Union Politics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malecki, Michael (2009). “The Politics of Constitutional Review: Evidence from the European Court of Justice,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Mancini, G. Federico (1989). “The Making of a Constitution for Europe,” Common Market Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 595–614.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1998). “Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett,” International Organization, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor (2005). “Judicial Independence and Impartiality in International Criminal Tribunals,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Powell, Emilia Justyna (2011). Domestic Law Goes Global: Legal Traditions and International Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2000). “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 217–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2013). “Liberal Theories of International Law,” in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 83–118.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L. (2008). “Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, Colter (2004). “Compliance with Final Judgments of the International Court of Justice since 1987,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 434–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2001). “The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 535–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. (1997). “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community,” International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A. (2006). “The Decline of the International Court of Justice,” in Voigt, Stefan, Albert, Max, and Schmidtchen, Dieter (eds.), International Conflict Resolution (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), pp. 111–42.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and de Figueiredo, Miguel F. P. (2005). “Is the International Court of Justice Biased?,” Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 599–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Yoo, John C. (2005). “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals,” California Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1993). “What Do Judges and Justices Maximze? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does),” Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 3, pp. 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, Eric (2002). “Tying Hands without a Rope: Rational Domestic Response to International Institutional Constraints,” in Drezner, Daniel W. (ed.), Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 77–104.Google Scholar
Romano, Cesare P. R. (1999). “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 709–51.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, and Horovitz, Sigall (2008). “Judicial Independence in The Hague and Freetown: A Tale of Two Cities,” Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Danner, Allision (2010). “Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court,” International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 225–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slack, James (2011). “Named and Shamed: The European Human Rights Judges Wrecking British Law,” Daily Mail, Mail Online, February 5.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1994). “A Typology of Transjudicial Communication,” University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 99–138.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2003). “A Global Community of Courts,” Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 191–220.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2004). A New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, James McCall (2003). “WTO Dispute Settlement: The Politics of Procedure in Appellate Body Rulings,” World Trade Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Vanberg, Georg (2008). “The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 504–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Moore, Will H. (2011). “Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. (2004). “Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 247–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Brunell, Thomas (1998). “Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Brunell, Thomas (2012). “The European Court of Justice, State Non-compliance, and the Politics of Override: Reply to Carruba, Gabel, and Hankla,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 204-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terris, Daniel, Romano, Cesare P. R., and Swigart, Leigh (2007). The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who Decide the World's Cases (Lebanon, NH: Brandeis University Press).Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg (2005). The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik (2007). “The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights,” International Organization, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik (2008). “The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 417–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik (2009). “The Politics of International Judicial Appointments,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 387–406.Google Scholar
Von Staden, Andreas (2009). Shaping Human Rights Policy in Liberal Democracies: Assessing and Explaining Compliance with the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). “The Transformation of Europe,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 100, No. 8, pp. 2403–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ADF Group v. United States of American, 18 ICSID Rev. 195 (2003).

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×