Intelligence – Theory, Research, and Testing in the Nordic Countries

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511616648.003

2 - Intelligence – Theory, Research, and Testing in the Nordic Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Berit Carlstedt ,

Jan-Eric Gustafsson and

Jarkko Hautamäki

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg

Show author details

Berit Carlstedt: Affiliation:
National Defence College, Sweden
Jan-Eric Gustafsson: Affiliation:
Göteborg University, Sweden
Jarkko Hautamäki: Affiliation:
Helsinki University
Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This chapter describes research on intelligence and practices of assessment in the Nordic countries. For the purposes of this chapter, the Nordic group of countries is taken to comprise Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. These four small (between 4 and 9 million persons) countries, share many characteristics. Three of the countries (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden) have highly similar languages, which are typically understood across countries. The fourth country (Finland) has a Swedish-speaking minority, while the main language (Finnish) is a quite different language than the other languages. All countries also have a high standard of living and are what is often referred to as “welfare states,” with societal solutions to problems such as medicine, health care, unemployment, and education. From a cultural point of view, there are also are many similarities among the four countries, which go far back in history.

DEFINITIONS AND MEASUREMENT OF INTELLIGENCE IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES

Conceptions of intelligence in the Nordic countries have been very strongly influenced by the psychometric research traditions that were developed in Britain, the United States, and elsewhere. There has, thus, been a strong focus on development and adaptation of tools for measuring intelligence and on empirical approaches in research on intelligence.

DEVELOPMENT OF TESTING

As was observed by Carroll (1982), the fundamental principles of the technology of intelligence testing were well established by the 1930s, whereas the development after this time may be described as elaborations, extensions, and refinements of these basic principles.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: International Handbook of Intelligence , pp. 49 - 78

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616648.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Åberg-Bengtsson, L. (1999). Dimensions of performance in the interpretation of diagrams, tables, and maps: Some gender differences in the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 565–5823.0.CO;2-L>CrossRef Google Scholar

Ahmavaara, Y. (1954). Transformation analysis of factorial data and other new analytical methods of differential psychology with their application to Thurstone's basic studies. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, B 88.2

Ahmavaava, Y. (1957a). On the unified factor theory of mind. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, B 106

Ahmavaara, Y. (1957b). The structure of mental abilities. Helsinki: WSOY (In Finnish)

Ahmavaara, Y. (1963). On the mathematical theory of transformation analysis. Publication of the Finnish Foundation of Alcohol Studies, No. 1/63

AVO (1981). The Great Study 1948. Publication of the Office of Vocational Guidance, No. 33. Helsinki: Office of Vocational Guidance

Balke-Aurell, G. (1982). Changes in ability as related to educational and occupational experience. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis

Beverfelt, E., Nordvik, H., & Nygård, A. (1967). WAIShåndbog, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. [WAIS handbook, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale]. Oslo: Norsk Psykologforening

Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux [New methods for diagnosing the intellectual level of abnormals]. L' Année Psychologique, 11, 191–336CrossRef Google Scholar

Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1908). Le développment de l'intelligence chez les enfants [The development of intelligence in children]. Année Psychologique, 14, 1–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Björsjö, M. (1951). Om spatial, teknisk och praktisk begåvning. [On spatial, technical, and practical abilities]. Göteborg: Elanders

Carlstedt, B. (2000). Cognitive abilities – aspects of structure, process, and measurement. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis

Carlstedt, B.(2001). Differentiation of cognitive abilities as a function of level of general intelligence: A latent variable approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 589–609CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Carlstedt, B., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Ullstadius, E. (2000). Item sequencing effects on the measurement of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28(2), 145–160CrossRef Google Scholar

Carlstedt, L., & Widén, H. (1999). Militärhögskoleprovet – manual [The officer selection test – manual]. Report LI-T:22. Karlstad, Sweden: National Defence College

Carroll, J. B. (1982). The measurement of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 29–120). New York: Cambridge University Press

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Carroll, J. B. (2003). The higher-stratum structure of cognitive abilities: There is a G, but no Gf. In H. Nyborg (Ed.) The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen. Elsevier Science/Pergamon PressCrossRef

Dureman, I., & Sälde, H. (1959). Psykometriska och experientalpsykologiska metoder för klinisk tillämpning [Psychometric and experimental methods for the clinical evaluation of mental functioning]. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell

Eckhoff, R. (1978). Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices. Rapport fra Normeringsarbeid. Unpublished manuscript. Arbeidspsykologisk Institutt, Oslo

Elonen, A. S., Takala, M., & Ruoppila, I. (1963). A study of intellectual functions in children by means of theKTKperformance scales. Jyväskylä studies in Education, Psychology, and Social research, 3

Emanuelsson, I., Reuterberg, S.-E., & Svensson, A. (1993). Changing differences in intelligence. Comparisons between groups of 13-year-olds tested from 1960 to 1990. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 37, 259–277CrossRef Google Scholar

Engvik, H., Hjerkin, O., & Seim, S. (1980). HåndbogWAIS. Norsk utgave. [WAIS handbook. Norwegian edition]. Oslo: Norsk Psykologförening

Ensiö, A. (1917). Oppikoulujen pohjakoulukysymys Suomessa [The Basic Educational Requirements for Gymnasia]. Turku: Author

Finkel, D., Pedersen, N. L., McGue, M., & McClearn, G. E. (1995). Heritability of cognitive abilities in adult twins: Comparison of Minnesota and Swedish data. Behavior Genetics, 25, 421–431CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29–51CrossRef Google Scholar

Furu, M. (2000). The Malmo Study. In C.-G. Jansson (Ed.), Seven Swedish longitudinal studies in the behavioral sciences. Stockhom, Sweden: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research

Gagnerud, S., & Haglund, B. (2000). Begåvningsstruktur och prognosvärde. [Structure of abilities and predictive validity]. Rapport till Styrgruppen för APU, National Labour Market Board

Gjessing, H. J., Nygaard, H. D., & Solheim, R. (1975). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Handbok med instruktioner og normer [Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Handbook with instructions and norms] Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget

Gustafsson, J.-E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203CrossRef Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J.-E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 35–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Gustafsson, J.-E. (2001). Schooling and intelligence: Effects of track of study on level and profile of cognitive abilities. Paper presented at the Spearman Conference, Sydney, Nov 28–30, 2001

Gustafsson, J.-E., & Balke, G. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28(4), 407–434CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gustafsson, J.-E., & Westerlund, A. (1994). Socialgruppsskillnader i prestationer på Högskoleprovet [Differences between socio-economic groups in performance on the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test]. In R. Eriksson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Sorteringen i skolan. Studier av snedrekrytering och utbildningens konsekvenser. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlsson Bokförlag

Gustafsson, J.-E., & Reuterberg, S.-E. (2000). Metodproblem vid studier av Högskoleprovets prognosförmåga – och deras lösning! [Methodological problems when studying the predictive validity of the SWE-SAT – and the solution!]Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 5(4), 273–283Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1992). Stability and change in broad and narrow factors of intelligence from ages 12 to 15 years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 141–149CrossRef Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). New York: Macmillan

Gustafsson, J.-E., Wedman, I., & Westerlund, A. (1992). The dimensionality of the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 36(1), 21–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Haavisto, M.-L., & Oksama, L. (1997). F/A 18 tutkatorjuntatehtävän tehtä-väanalyysi [The task analysis of F/A 18 radar attack missions]. Unpublished manuscript

Haavisto, M.-L., & Lehto, J. (2003). Fluid and crystallized intelligence in relation to domain-specific Working Memory: A latent-variable approach. Submitted

Hagtvet, K. A., & Undheim, J.-O. (1988). The Norwegian experience of test use: A selective review of Norwegian tests and measurements in cultural context. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human abilities in cultural context. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Härnqvist, K. (1960). Manual till DBA – differentiell begåvningsanalys [Manual for DBA – Differential Aptitudes Battery]. Stockholm, Sweden: Skandinaviska Testförlaget

Härnqvist, K. (1968a). Relative changes in intelligence from 13–18. I. Background and methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 9, 50–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Härnqvist, K. (1968b). Relative changes in intelligence from 13–18. II. Results. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 9, 65–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Härnqvist, K. (2000). Evaluation through follow-up: A longitudinal program for studying education and career development. In C.-G. Jansson (Ed.), Seven Swedish longitudinal studies in the behavioral sciences. Stockhom, Sweden: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research

Härnqvist, K., & Stahle, G. (1977). An ecological analysis of test score changes over time. Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg, Report No. 64

Hautamäki, J. (1989). The application of a Rasch model on Piagetian measures of thinking. In P. Adey, J. Bliss, J. Head, & M. Shayer (Eds.), Adolescent development and school science. London: Falmers

Hautamäki, J. (1999). Epidemiology of Excellence – an assessment of the commitment to thinking with Sternberg triarchic ability test. In Potential into performance, (pp. 20–23). QCA Ref: QCA/99/400. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA)

Hautamäki, J. Arinen, P., Bergholm, B., Hautamäki, A., Kupiainen, S., Kuusela, J., Lehto, J., Niemivirta, M., & Scheinin, P. (1999). Learning-to-learn: The 6th graders (in Finnish). Publications 3/1999. Helsinki: National Board of Education

Hautamäki, J. Arinen, P., Hautamäki, A., Ikonen-Varila, M., Kupiainen, S., Lindblom, B., Niemivirta, M., Rantanen, P., Ruuth, M., & Scheinin, P. (2000). Learning-to-learn: The 9th graders (in Finnish). Publications 7/2000. Helsinki: National Board of Education

Hellesnes, T., Raaheim, K., & Bengtsson, G. (1982). Attempts to predict intelligent behavior: III. The relative importance of divergent and convergent production. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23(4), 263–266CrossRef Google Scholar

Hellström, A. (1960). Intelligensmätning (Lewis M. Terman and Maud A. Merrill). Stockholm, Sweden: Föreningen Sävstaholmsskolorna

Henrysson, S. (1962). The relation between factor loadings and biserial correlations in item analysis. Psychometrika, 27, 419–424CrossRef Google Scholar

Husén, T. (1948). Konstruktion och standardisering av svenska krigsmaktens inskrivningsprov. 1948 års version [Construction and standardization of the Swedish Armed Forces' Enlistment battery, 1948 version]. Lund, Sweden: Håkan Ohlssons Boktryckeri

Husén, T. (1950). Testresultatens prognosvärde [The predictive validity of test results]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell

Husén, T. (1951). The influence of schooling upon IQ. Theoria, 17, 61–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Husén, T., & Tuijnman, A. (1991). The contribution of formal schooling to the increase in intellectual capital. Educational Researcher, 20(1), 17–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Jaederholm, G. (1914). Undersökningar över intelligensmätningarnas teori och praxis [Investigations concerning the theory and practice of measurement of intelligence]. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wikzell

Jansson, C.-G. (2000). Seven Swedish longitudinal studies in the behavioral sciences. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research

Jöreskog, K. G. (1967). Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32(4), 443–482CrossRef Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202CrossRef Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika, 57, 239–251CrossRef Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simulatenous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426CrossRef Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In: O. D. Duncan & A. S. Goldberger (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85–112). New York: Seminar Press

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1973). LISRELIII – Estimation of linear structu-ral equation systems by maximum likelihood methods. AFORTRANIV program

Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D., Du Toit, S., & Du Toit, M. (2001). LISREL8: New statistical features (Third printing with revisions). Chicago: Scientific Software International

Kebbon, L. (1968). Manual tillUS-batteriet [Manual for the US-battery]. Stockholm: Skandinaviska Testförlaget

Korkiakangas, M. (1977). Factor analytic methodology in Finnish psychological studies in the 40's and 50's. Psykologia, 12(1), 3–12Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. (1938). Älykkyystutkimuksen menetelmät [Methods of Intelligence Research]. Porvoo: WSOY

Kuusinen, J., & Blåfield, L. (1972). ITPA– theory, characteristics, and use (in Finnish). Publications 156/72. Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä

Kuusinen, J., & Leskinen, E. (1988). Latent structure analysis of longitudinal data on relations between intellectual abilities and school achievement. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 103–188CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Langset, M. (1984). Håndbok forWPPSI. Norsk utgave. [WPPSI handbook. Norwegian edition]. Oslo, Norway: Norsk Psykologforening

Lehtovaara, A. (1960). Stanford-Binet type of tests for the assessment of intelligence of children and adults (standardized for Finnish circumstances). Publications 7/1960. The Central Union for the Protection of Children

Lilius, A. (1913). Något om intelligensundersökningar [Measuring intelligence]. Tidskrift utg. Af Pedagogiska föreningen i Finland

Lilius, A. (1916). Skolålderns själsliv [The intellectual life of school-aged children]. Borgå: Holger Schildts Förlag

Lofthus, J. (1931). Intelligensmåling [Measurement of intelligence]. Oslo

Looft, C. (1913). Intelligensundersökelser av skolbarn [Investigations of intelligence among school children]. Medicinsk Revue, 569–585Google Scholar

Lund, T., & Thrane, V. C. (1983). Schooling and intelligence: A methodological and longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 161–173CrossRef Google Scholar

Magnusson, D. (1961). Testteori [Test theory]. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist och Wiksell/Gebers Förlag

Mårdberg, B., & Carlstedt, B. (1998). Swedish Enlistment Battery (SEB): Construct validity and latent variable estimation of cognitive abilities by the CAT-SEB. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(2), 107–114CrossRef Google Scholar

Mårdberg, B., Sjöberg, A., & Henrysson Eidvall, S. (2000). BasIQ begåvningstest. Manual [BasIQ test of cognitive abilities. Manual]. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB

McClearn, G. E., Johansson, B., Berg, S., Pedersen, N. L., Ahern, F., Perrill, S. A., & Plomin, R. (1997). Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. Science, 276, 1560–1563CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). New York: MacMillan

Mönnesland, K. (1948). Intelligenspröver for voksne. [Intelligence tests for adults]. Oslo, Norway: Norli

Mortensen, E. L., Reinisch, J. M., & Teasdale, T. W. (1989). Intelligence as measured by the WAIS and a military draft board group test. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 30, 315–318CrossRef Google Scholar

Partanen, J., Bruun, K., & Markkanen, T. (1966). Inheritance of drinking behavior. A study on intelligence, personality, and use of alcohol of adult twins. Alcohol research in the Northern countries, Studies 14. Helsinki: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies

Pedersen, N. L., Plomin, R., Nesselroade, J. R., & McClearn, G. E. (1992). A quantitative genetic analysis of cognitive abilities during the second half of the life span. Psychological Science, 3, 346–353CrossRef Google Scholar

Pedersen, N., & Lichtenstein, P. (2000). The Swedish Twin Registry. A presentation. In B. Smedby, I. Lundberg, & T. Sörensen (Eds.) Scientific evaluation of the Swedish Twin Registry. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research, report 2000:10

Psykotekniska Institutet (1970). DELTA batteriet [The DELTA-battery]. Stockholm, Sweden: Psykologiförlaget

Raaheim, K. (1988). Intelligence and task novelty. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, (Vol. 4, pp. 73–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Raaheim, K. (1991). Is the high IQ person really in trouble? Why? In H. A. H. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence, reconceptualization and measurement (pp. 35–46). Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research, Ltd

Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research

Rasch, G. (1966). An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 49–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Räty, H., Pölönen, K., Pölönen, P., & Snellman, L. (1995). Student assessment and definition of intelligence: A historical perspective. Psykologia, 30, 179–185Google Scholar

Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1992). Does gender make any difference? Common sense conceptions of intelligence. Social Behavior and Personality, 20, 23–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1998). Social representation of educability. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 359–373CrossRef Google Scholar

Reuterberg, S.-E. (1998). On differential selection in the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude test. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 81–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Ribsskog, B. (1941). Evnepröver for 1. klasse i folkeskolen. Standardisert på grunnlag av Kuhlmann-Andersons gruppepröver [Ability tests for grade 1 of compulsory school. Standardized on the basis of the Kuhlmann-Anderson group test]. Oslo

Riis, E. (1988). Militaerpsykologin I Norge [Military psychology in Norway]. Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening, 23, 21–37Google Scholar

Rist, T. (1982). Det intellektuelle prestationsnivået I befolkningen sett i lys av den samfunnsmessiga utvecklinga. En unders⊘kelse av norske rekrutters prestationer på psykologiske sesjonspr⊘ver [The intellectual level in the population seen in the light of the development of society. Norwegian recruits' results on the draft board tests]. Forsvarets Psykologitjeneste, Oslo

Rosén, M. (1998). Gender differences in patterns of knowledge. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis

Rosenqvist, A. (1919). Kasvatus ja koulu [How to take into account the giftedness of pupils at school.]Education and School (in Finnish), 5, 56–65Google Scholar

Sandven, J. (1954). Norsk standard av Terman-Merrill Stanford-revisjon av Binet-prövene [Norwegian standardization of the Terman-Merrill revision of the Binet tests]. Oslo, Norway: Cappelen

Salomaa, J. E. (1938). Älykkyyden mittaaminen [The measurement of intelligence]. Porvoo: WSOY

Scheinin, P., & Mehtäläinen, J. (1999). Applying the theory of knowledge to teaching thinking. In J. H. M. Hamers, J. E. H. van Luit, & B. Csapo, (Eds.), Teaching and learning thinking skills. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger

Siegvald, H. (1944). Experimentella undersökningar rörande intellektuella könsdifferenser [Experimental investigations concerning intellectual sex differences]. Lund, Sweden: Håkan Olssons Boktryckeri

Sinivou, J. (1977). Ilmavoimien varusmiesohjaaja- ja lentokadettikurssilla menestymisen ennustamisesta: Sotilasohjaajan ammattianalyysi ja valintajärjestelmän kehittämismahdollisuudet [The predictors of success in the training of Finnish Air Force conscripts and cadets: The occupational analysis and the future scenarios of developing the selection system]. Military Psychological Series of Publications, 9/A/77. Helsinki: Pääesikunta

Spearman, C. (1904a). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101CrossRef Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1904b). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293CrossRef Google Scholar

Spelling, K. (1999). Danish Ability Test. Psykologisk paedagogisk Radgivning, 29(2), 127–132Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Castejon, J. L., Prieto, M. D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg Triarchic Ability Test (multiple-choice items) in three international samples: An empirical test of the triarchic theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 1–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Sundet, J. M., Tambs, K., & Magnus, P. (1981). Heritability analysis as a means of analyzing the effects of social changes on psychological variables. An empirical study of IQ-scores. Psychiatry and Social Sciences, 1, 241–248Google Scholar

Takala, M. (1953). Studies of psychomotor personality tests. Helsinki: Institute of Occupational Health

Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1984). Heredity and familial environment in intelligence and educational level: A sibling study. Nature, 309, 620–622CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1987). National secular trends in intelligence and education: A 20-year cross sectional study. Nature, 325, 119–121CrossRef Google Scholar

Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1989). Continuing secular increases in intelligence and a stable prevalence of high intelligence levels. Intelligence, 13, 255–262CrossRef Google Scholar

Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (1994). Thirty-year secular trends in the cognitive abilities of Danish male school leavers at a high educational level. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 35, 328–335CrossRef Google Scholar

Teasdale, T. W., & Owen, D. R. (2000). Forty-year secular trends in cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 28, 115–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 406–427CrossRef Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, No. 1Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Torjussen, T. M., & Hansen, I. (1999). Forsvaret best i test? Bruk av psykologiske tester i forsvaret, med speciell vekt på flygerseleksjon [Is the Defense best in test? Use of psychological tests in the Defense with special weight on pilot selection.]Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologförening, 36(8), 772–779Google Scholar

Ullstadius, E., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Carlstedt, B. (2002). Influence of general and crystallized intelligence on vocabulary test performance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 78–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Undheim, J. O. (1978a). WISC-R håndbog. Norsk utgave [WISC-R handbook. Norwegian edition]. Oslo, Norway: Norsk Psykologforening

Undheim, J. O. (1978b). Broad ability factors in 12- to 13-year-old children, the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(3), 433–443CrossRef Google Scholar

Undheim, J. O. (1979). Capitalization on chance: The case of Guilford's memory abilities. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 71–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Undheim, J. O. (1981a). On intelligence: II. A neo-Spearman model to replace Cattell's theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22(3), 181–187CrossRef Google Scholar

Undheim, J. O. (1981b). On intelligence IV: Toward a restoration of general intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 251–265CrossRef Google Scholar

Undheim, J. O., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (1987). The hierarchical organization of cognitive abilities: Restoring general intelligence through the use of linear structural relations (LISREL). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 149–171CrossRef Google Scholar

Undheim, J. O., & Horn, J. L. (1977). Critical evaluation of Guilford's structure-of-intellect theory. Intelligence, 1, 65–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Vainikainen, A. (1998). Varusmiesten johtajavalintatutkimus 1995. [Study of leader selection (among conscripts) in 1995]. Finnish Defence Forces, Education Development Centre, Separate Reports, 1/1998. Pieksämäki, Finland: RT-Print OY

Werdelin, I. (1961). Geometrical ability and the space factors in boys and girls. Lund: Gleerups

Werdelin, I., & Stjernberg, G. (1971). The relationship between difficulty and factor loadings of some visual-perceptual tests. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 12, 21–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Westrin, P. A. (1967). WIT III Manual [Manual of WIT III]. Stockholm, Sweden: Psykologiförlaget

White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481CrossRef Google Scholar

Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.