Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law. Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R., and Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2016. ‘How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts’, Law and Contemporary Problems 79 (1):1–36.Google Scholar

Asamblea Nacional. 2009. Acta de las sesiones de la Asamblea Nacional de la República Dominicana. 54. October 19.Google Scholar

Barbosa Delgado, Francisco R. 2011. ‘Los límites a la doctrina del margen nacional de apreciación en el Tribunal Europeo y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos: intervención judicial en torno a ciertos derechos de las minorías étnicas y culturales’, Revista Derecho del Estado 26:107–135.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal. 1999. ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards’, International Law and Politics 31 (4):843–854.Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas. 1985. ‘The Advisory Practice of the Inter-American Human Rights Court’, The American Journal of International Law 79 (1):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Candia, Gonzalo. 2014. ‘Comparing Diverse Approaches to the Margin of Appreciation: The Case of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.’ Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2406705 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2406705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantón, Santiago A. 2013. ‘To Strengthen Human Rights, Change the OAS (Not the Commission)’, Human Rights Brief 20 (2):5–12.Google Scholar

Cardenas, Sonia. 2010. Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressure, Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Castillo, Pelegrín. 2011. Haití y los intereses nacionales. Santo Domingo: Editorial Santuario.Google Scholar

CEJIL. 2010. Summary of Initial Petition in the case of Emildo Bueno Oguis v. Dominican Republic. Presented to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on 1 June 2010: Open Society Justice Initiative and CEJIL.Google Scholar

Cerqueira, Daniel. 2015. ‘El Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos en los tiempos del cólera’, In Latin America Goes Global, edited by Sabatini, Christopher. http://latinamericagoesglobal.org/2015/10/el-sistema-interamericano-de-derechos-humanos-en-los-tiempos-del-colera/.Google Scholar

CIDH. 1984. Proposed Amendments to the Naturalization Provision of the Constitution of Costa Rica. In OC-4/84. San José, Costa Rica: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

CIDH. 2001. Caso Barrios Altos vs. Perú. In Serie C 75. San José, Costa Rica: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

CIDH. 2005. Caso de las Niñas Yean y Bosico vs. República Dominicana. In Serie C No. 130. San José Costa Rica: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

CIDH. 2011. Caso Gelman vs. Uruguay. In Serie C No. 221. San José, Costa Rica: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

CIDH. 2012a. Caso González Medina y familiares vs. República Dominicana. In Serie C No. 240. San José, Costa Rica: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

CIDH. 2012b. Caso Nadege Dorzema y otros vs. República Dominicana. In Serie C No. 251. San José, Costa Rica: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

CIDH. 2014. Caso de personas dominicanas y haitianas expulsadas vs. República Dominicana. In Series C No. 282. San José, Costa Rica: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

CIDH. 2015. Caso Granier y otros (Radio Caracas Televisión) vs. Venezuela. In Series C. No. 293. San José, Costa Rica: Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

Congreso. 2004. Ley No. 285–04 (Ley de Migración). El Congreso Nacional de la República Dominicana. Santo Domingo.Google Scholar

Congreso. 2014. Ley no. 169/14. El Congreso Nacional de la República Dominicana. Santo Domingo.Google Scholar

Constitución de la República Dominicana 2010. Santo Domingo.Google Scholar

Contesse, Jorge. In press. ‘Subsidiarity in Inter-American Human Rights Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems.Google Scholar

Culliton-González, Katherine. 2012. ‘Born in the Americas: Birthright Citizenship and Human Rights’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 25 (1):127–182.Google Scholar

Duhaime, Bernard. 2014. ‘Subsidiarity in the Americas. What Room Is There for Deference in the Inter-American System?’ In Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation, edited by Gruszcynski, Lukasz and Werner, Wouter, 290–316. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dulitzky, Ariel E. 2011. ‘The Inter-American Rights System Fifty Years Later: Time for Changes’, Quebec Journal of International Law (Special issue):127–164.Google Scholar

Dulitzky, Ariel E. 2015. ‘An Inter-American Constitutional Court? The Invention of the Conventionality Control by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, Texas International Law Journal 50 (1):45–93.Google Scholar

Dutrénit Bielous, Silvia. 2013. ‘Sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y reacciones estatales. México y Uruguay ante los delitos del pasado’, América Latina Hoy 61: 79–99.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, and O’Meara, Noreen. 2014. ‘Advisory Jurisdiction and the European Court of Human Rights: A Magic Bullet for Dialogue and Docket-Control?’, Legal Studies 34 (3):444–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farer, Tom J. 1997. ‘The Rise of the Inter-American Human Rights Regime: No Longer a Unicorn, Not Yet an Ox’, Human Rights Quarterly 19 (3):510–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

FH. 2015. Freedom in the World 2015, edited by Freedom House. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar

Gargarella, Roberto. 2013. Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810–2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gargarella, Roberto. 2015a. ‘Democracy and Rights in Gelman v. Uruguay’, AJIL Unbound 109:115–119.Google Scholar

Gargarella, Roberto. 2015b. ‘La democracia frente a los crimenes masivos: una reflexion a la luz del caso Gelman’, Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Internacional 1:1–15.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom. 2013. ‘Political Constraints on International Courts’, Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper 453:483–502.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Darren, and Jacoby, Wade. 2010. ‘Partial Compliance. A Comparison of the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights’, Journal of International Law and International Relations 6 (1):35–85.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. 2002. ‘Overlegalizing Human Rights: International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash against Human Rights Regimes’, Columbia Law Review 102 (7):1832–1911.Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2013. Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

HRW. 2013. ‘Ecuador: End Assault on Free Speech’, Human Rights Watch, June 17.Google Scholar

JCE. 2007. Resolución para la puesta en vigencia del libro registro del nacimiento de niño (a) de madre extranjera no residente en República Dominicana, edited by Junta Central Electoral. Santo Domingo: Junta Central Electoral.Google Scholar

Malarino, Ezequiel. 2012. ‘Judicial Activism, Punitivism and Supranationalisation: Illiberal and Antidemocratic Tendencies of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, International Criminal Law Review 12 (4):665–695.Google Scholar

Marsteintredet, Leiv. 2012. ‘Change and Continuity in Dominican Constitutions: The 2010 Reform Compared’, in New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices, edited by Nolte, Detlef and Schilling-Vacaflor, Almut, 223–242. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Marsteintredet, Leiv. 2014. ‘Mobilising against International Human Rights: Re-Domesticating the Dominican Citizenship Regime’, Iberoamericana. Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 44 (1–2):73–98.Google Scholar

Martínez, Samuel. 2014. ‘The Price of Confrontation: International Redistributive Justice and the Struggle for Haitian-Dominican Rights’, in The Uses and Misuses of Human Rights: A Critical Approach to Advocacy, edited by Andreopolous, George and Arat, Zehra, 89–115. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Neuman, Gerald L. 2008. ‘Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law 19 (1):101–123.Google Scholar

Panama. 2014. Request for an advisory opinion by the government of the republic of Panama. Government of the Republic of Panamá. Panamá.Google Scholar

Pasqualucci, Jo M. 2002. ‘Advisory Practice of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Contributing to the Evolution of International Human Rights Law’, Stanford Journal of International Law 38:241–288.Google Scholar

Pasqualucci, Jo M. 2014. The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Picq, Manuela. 2012. ‘Is the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights too progressive?’ Al Jazeera online, 09 June.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A. 2014. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric, and Yoo, John. 2005. ‘Judicial Independence in International Tribunals’, California Law Review 93 (1):1–72.Google Scholar

Sabatini, Christopher. 2015. ‘Ecuador, Argentina and the At-Risk Inter-American system’. In Latin America Goes Global, edited by Sabatini, Christopher. http://latinamericagoesglobal.org/2015/07/ecuador-argentina-and-the-at-risk-inter-american-system/.Google Scholar

Saul, Matthew. 2015. ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Margin of Appreciation and the Processes of National Parliaments’, Human Rights Law Review 15:745–774.Google Scholar

Schmid, Julie Calidonio. 2006. ‘Advisory Opinions on Human Rights: Moving beyond Pyrrhic Victory’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 16:415–455.Google Scholar

Tribunal Constitucional. 2013. Sentencia TC/0168/13. Santo Domingo.Google Scholar

Tribunal Constitucional. 2014. Sentencia TC/0256/14. Santo Domingo.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 1999. ‘Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis’, American Political Science Review 93 (3):591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vio Grossi, Eduardo. 2015. ‘Voto individual concurrente del juez Eduardo Vio Grossi’, Caso Granier y otros (Radio Caracas Televisión) vs. Venezuela. In Series C 293, CIDH. San José, Costa Rica.Google Scholar

Wooding, Bridget. 2014. ‘Upholding Birthright Citizenship in the Dominican Republic’, Iberoamericana 44 (1–2):99–121.Google Scholar