Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:41:29.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Other major issues relating to belligerent occupation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2011

Yoram Dinstein
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Get access

Summary

Settlements

Geneva Convention (IV)

570. Article 49 (sixth paragraph) of Geneva Convention (IV) promulgates:

The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

Although this prohibition is not enumerated as a grave breach in the Convention itself, Article 85(4)(a) of Protocol I appends it to the list of grave breaches. Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court stigmatizes as a war crime the ‘transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies’. The words ‘directly or indirectly’ appear neither in the original Geneva text nor in the Protocol. They were inserted in the Rome Statute as a reminder that not only a compulsory transfer into the occupied territories counts, but also one based on acts of ‘inducement and facilitation’. The reminder was intended ‘as a snub to Israel’. In the Elements of Crime, a footnote was appended, whereby ‘[t]he term “transfer” needs to be interpreted in accordance with the relevant provisions of international humanitarian law’.

571. The use of the verbs ‘deport’ and ‘transfer’ in the sixth paragraph of Article 49 (in relation to the Occupying Power's own population) – the same key words employed in the first paragraph of the Article (having to do with protected persons in an occupied territory) (see supra 376) – may cause some confusion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cryer, R., Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime274 (2005)
Henckaerts, J.-M., ‘Deportation and Transfer of Civilians in Time of War’, 26 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law469, 478 (1993–4)Google Scholar
Kerber, N.M., Les Droits de l'Homme dans les Territoires Administrés par Israël 91 n. 104 (1978)
Pertile, M., ‘Beit Sourik Village Council v. The Government of Israel: A Matter of Principle (and Neglected Rules)’, 65 Heidelberg Journal of International Law677, 697 (2005)Google Scholar
Shany, Y., ‘Capacities and Inadequacies: A Look at the Two Separation Barrier Cases’, 38 Israel Law Review230, 246 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keidar, N., ‘An Examination of the Authority of the Military Commander to Requisition Privately Owned Land for the Construction of the Separation Barrier’, 38 Israel Law Review247, 251–3 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerance, M., ‘A Court of “UN Law”’, 38 Israel Law Review134, 147–50 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmer, D., ‘The Advisory Opinion: The Light Treatment of International Humanitarian Law’, 99 American Journal of International Law88, 96 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, K., ‘Article 96 UN Charter’, The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary181, 182 (Zimmermann, A., Tomuschat, C. and Oellers-Frahm, K. eds., 2006)Google Scholar
Gross, A.M., ‘Human Proportions: Are Human Rights the Emperor's New Clothes of the International Law of Occupation?’, 18 European Journal of International Law1, 13–26 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quigley, J., ‘Mass Displacement and the Individual Right of Return’, 68 British Year Book of International Law65, 71 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Y., ‘The Israel Supreme Court and the Law of Belligerent Occupation: Reunification of Families’, 18 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights173–88 (1988)Google Scholar
Singer, J., ‘The Emerging Palestinian Democracy under the West Bank and Gaza Strip Self-Government Arrangements’, 26 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights313, 317–18 (1996)Google Scholar
Fairman, C., ‘Some Observations on Military Occupation’, 32 Minnesota Law Review319, 329 (1947–8)Google Scholar
Zamir, I., ‘Media Coverage of Military Operations’, 18 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights61, 64 (1988)Google Scholar
MacCoubrey, H., ‘The Protection of Creed and Opinion in the Laws of Armed Conflict’, 5 Journal of Conflict and Security Law135, 150 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×