A general framework for capturing interpersonal emotion dynamics

doi:10.1017/9781316822944.004

Chapter 2 - A general framework for capturing interpersonal emotion dynamics

Associations with psychological and relational adjustment

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 September 2018

Laura Sels ,

Eva Ceulemans and

Peter Kuppens

Edited by

Ashley K. Randall and

Dominik Schoebi

Show author details

Ashley K. Randall: Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Dominik Schoebi: Affiliation:
Université de Fribourg, Switzerland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

How emotions are connected, shared and exchanged between people over time signals important relationship processes and also impacts people’s individual wellbeing. To promote a better understanding of the involved processes and mechanisms, we propose a framework that captures four key characteristics of interpersonal emotion dynamics. We distinguish between characteristics that capture only the interpersonal emotional aspects versus characteristics that capture the interpersonal system as a whole (taking into account both intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional aspects), and between characteristics that capture the time-dependent versus time-independent aspects of emotion dynamics. Combined, this results in the following four characteristics of interpersonal emotion dynamics: (1) emotional covariation, or how emotions of different individuals covary across time, (2) emotional influencing, or how a change in one individual’s emotions predicts other people’s subsequent emotional change, (3) emotional variability, indicating the extent of fluctuations in the interpersonal emotion system, and (4) emotional inertia, representing the carryover of the emotional state of the interpersonal system over time. For each, we synthesize existing research on these characteristics, their relation with (mal)adjustment indicators, underlying processes, and current gaps in research.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Interpersonal Emotion Dynamics in Close Relationships , pp. 27 - 46

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822944.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1054–68.10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Anderson, C., Keltner, D., Tiedens, L. Z., & Leach, C. W. (2004). The emotional convergence hypothesis. In Tiedens, L. Z. & Leach, C. W. (Eds.), The Social Life of Emotions (pp. 144–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E., & Ammazzalorso, H. (2001). Emotional experience in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. & Clark, M. S. (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes (pp. 308–30). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar

Butler, E. A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: the “TIES” that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 367–93.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Butler, E. A. (2015). Interpersonal affect dynamics: it takes two (and time) to tango. Emotion Review, 7(4), 336–41.10.1177/1754073915590622CrossRef Google Scholar

Butler, E. A., & Randall, A. K. (2013). Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review, 5(2), 202–10.CrossRef Google Scholar

Butner, J., Amazeen, P. G., & Mulvey, G. M. (2005). Multilevel modeling of two cyclical processes: extending differential structural equation modeling to nonlinear coupled systems. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 159–77.10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.159CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Butner, J., Diamond, L. M., & Hicks, A. M. (2007). Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 14(3), 431–55.10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00164.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Chow, S.-M., Haltigan, J. D., & Messinger, D. S. (2010). Dynamic infant-parent affect coupling during the face-to-face/still-face. Emotion, 10(1), 101–14.10.1037/a0017824CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cook, J., Tyson, R., White, J., Rushe, R., Gottman, J., & Murray, J. (1995). Mathematics of marital conflict: qualitative dynamic mathematical modeling of marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(2), 110–30.10.1037/0893-3200.9.2.110CrossRef Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1995). The relation of young children's vicarious emotional responding to social competence, regulation, and emotionality. Cognition & Emotion, 9(2–3), 203–28.10.1080/02699939508409009CrossRef Google Scholar

Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Trull, T. J. (2009). Ecological momentary assessment of mood disorders and mood dysregulation. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 463–75.10.1037/a0017075CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Erber, R., Wegner, D. M., & Therriault, N. (1996). On being cool and collected: mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 757–66.10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.757CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Feldman, R. (2003). Development across the Life Span. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Feldman, R. (2007). Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(3–4), 329–54.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Feldman, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1997). Affect regulation and synchrony in mother-infant play as precursors to the development of symbolic competence. Infant Mental Health Journal, 18(1), 4–23.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199721)18:1<4::AID-IMHJ2>3.0.CO;2-R3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRef Google Scholar

Feldman, R., Greenbaum, C. W., & Yirmiya, N. (1999). Mother-infant affect synchrony as an antecedent of the emergence of self-control. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 223–31.10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.223CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferrer, E. (2016). Exploratory approaches for studying social interactions, dynamics, and multivariate processes in psychological science. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 240–56.10.1080/00273171.2016.1140629CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ferrer, E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Modeling affective processes in dyadic relations via dynamic factor analysis. Emotion, 3(4), 344–60.10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.344CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Field, T. (1985). Attachment as psychobiological attunement: being on the same wavelength. In Reite, M. & Field, T. (Eds.), The psychobiology of attachment and separation (pp. 415–54). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-586780-1.50020-3CrossRef Google Scholar

Fischer, A. H., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2010). Where have all the people gone? A plea for including social interaction in emotion research. Emotion Review, 2(3), 208–11.10.1177/1754073910361980CrossRef Google Scholar

Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & Vandellen, M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122(4), 648–73.10.1037/a0039654CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In Kitayama, S. & Markus, H. R. (Eds.), Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence (pp. 51–87). Washington, DC: Americal Psychological Association.10.1037/10152-002CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbons, F. X. (1986). Social comparison and depression: company's effect on misery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 140–8.10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.140CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2012). Family Therapy: An Overview. Canada: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 34–48.10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.34CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 169–97.10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.169CrossRef Google Scholar

Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Murray, J. (1999). The mathematics of marital conflict: dynamic mathematical nonlinear modeling of newlywed marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(1), 3–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Swanson, K. (2002). A general systems theory of marriage: nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 326–40.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_07CrossRef Google Scholar

Granic, I., & Lamey, A. V. (2002). Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 30(3), 265–83.Google Scholar PubMed

Hamaker, E. L., Zhang, Z., & Van der Maas, H. L. (2009). Using threshold autoregressive models to study dyadic interactions. Psychometrika, 74(4), 727–45.10.1007/s11336-009-9113-4CrossRef Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional Contagion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hollenstein, T. (2013). State Space Grids (pp. 11–33). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-5007-8_2CrossRef Google Scholar

Hollenstein, T. (2015). This time, it's real: affective flexibility, time scales, feedback loops, and the regulation of emotion. Emotion Review, 7(4), 308–15.10.1177/1754073915590621CrossRef Google Scholar

Hollenstein, T., Granic, I., Stoolmiller, M., & Snyder, J. (2004). Rigidity in parent-child interactions and the development of externalizing and internalizing behavior in early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(6), 595–607.10.1023/B:JACP.0000047209.37650.41CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hollenstein, T., & Lewis, M. D. (2006). A state space analysis of emotion and flexibility in parent-child interactions. Emotion, 6(4), 656–62.10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.656CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hollenstein, T., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., & Potworowski, G. (2013). A model of socioemotional flexibility at three time scales. Emotion Review, 5(4), 397–405.10.1177/1754073913484181CrossRef Google Scholar

Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901–30.10.1037/a0038822CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Huntsinger, J. R., Lun, J., Sinclair, S., & Clore, G. L. (2009). Contagion without contact: anticipatory mood matching in response to affiliative motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(7), 909–22.10.1177/0146167209335299CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Kelley, H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., et al. (1983). Close Relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar

Kim, K. J., Conger, R. D., Lorenz, F. O., & Elder, H. G. Jr. (2001). Parent-adolescent reciprocity in negative affect and its relation to early adult social development. Developmental Psychology, 37(6), 775–90.10.1037/0012-1649.37.6.775CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koval, P., Pe, M. L., Meers, K., & Kuppens, P. (2013). Affective dynamics in relation to depressive symptoms: variable, unstable, or inert? Emotion, 13(6), 1132–41.10.1037/a0033579CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kuppens, P. (2015). It's about time: a special section on affect dynamics. Emotion Review, 7(4), 297–300.10.1177/1754073915590947CrossRef Google Scholar

Kuppens, P., Sheeber, L. B., Yap, M. B., et al. (2012). Emotional inertia prospectively predicts the onset of depressive disorder in adolescence. Emotion, 12(2), 283–9.10.1037/a0025046CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kuppens, P., & Verduyn, P. (2015). Looking at emotion regulation through the window of emotion dynamics. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 72–9.10.1080/1047840X.2015.960505CrossRef Google Scholar

Larson, R. W., & Almeida, D. M. (1999). Emotional transmission in the daily lives of families: a new paradigm for studying family process. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 5–20.10.2307/353879CrossRef Google Scholar

Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). The common fate model for dyadic data: variations of a theoretically important but underutilized model. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(1), 140–8.10.1037/a0026624CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ledermann, T., & Macho, S. (2014). Analyzing change at the dyadic level: the common fate growth model. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(2), 204–13.10.1037/a0036051CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Levenson, W. R., & Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 587–97.10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.587CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lewis, M. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approach for an integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71(1), 36–43.10.1111/1467-8624.00116CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, M. L., Lamey, A. V., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2(4), 457–75.10.1111/1467-7687.00090CrossRef Google Scholar

Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Kunnen, S. E., & van Geert, P. L. (2009). Here we go again: a dynamic systems perspective on emotional rigidity across parent-adolescent conflicts. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1364–75.10.1037/a0016713CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Locke, K. D., & Horowitz, L. M. (1990). Satisfaction in interpersonal interactions as a function of similarity in level of dysphoria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 823–31.10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.823CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mancini, K. J., & Luebbe, A. M. (2016). Dyadic affective flexibility and emotional inertia in relation to youth psychopathology: an integrated model at two timescales. Clinical child and family psychology Review, 19(2) 117–33.10.1007/s10567-016-0200-7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674041127CrossRef Google Scholar

Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56(2), 289–302.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Flux, pulse, and spin: dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 880–93.10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.880CrossRef Google Scholar

Papp, L. M., Pendry, P., Simon, C. D., & Adam, E. K. (2013). Spouses’ cortisol associations and moderators: testing physiological synchrony and connectedness in everyday life. Family Process, 52(2), 284–98.10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01413.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Parkinson, B. (2011), Interpersonal emotion transfer: contagion and social appraisal. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 428–39. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00365.x.CrossRef Google Scholar

Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. (2015). Current emotion research in social psychology: thinking about emotions and other people. Emotion Review, 7(4), 371–80.10.1177/1754073915590624CrossRef Google Scholar

Parkinson, B., & Simons, G. (2009). Affecting others: social appraisal and emotion contagion in everyday decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1071–84.10.1177/0146167209336611CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pe, M. L., Kircanski, K., Thompson, R. J., Bringmann, L. F., Tuerlinckx, F., Mestdagh, M., … Kuppens, P., (2015). Emotion-network density in major depressive disorder. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(2), 292–300.10.1177/2167702614540645CrossRef Google Scholar

Pe, M. L., & Kuppens, P. (2012). The dynamic interplay between emotions in daily life: augmentation, blunting, and the role of appraisal overlap. Emotion, 12(6), 1320–328.10.1037/a0028262CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Randall, A. K., Post, J. H., Reed, R. G., & Butler, E. A. (2013). Cooperating with your romantic partner: associations with interpersonal emotion coordination. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(8), 1072–95.10.1177/0265407513481864CrossRef Google Scholar

Randall, A. K., & Schoebi, D. (2015). Lean on me: susceptibility to partner affect attenuates psychological distress over a 12-month period. Emotion, 15(2), 201–10.10.1037/emo0000043CrossRef Google Scholar

Reed, R. G., Barnard, K., & Butler, E. A. (2015). Distinguishing emotional coregulation from codysregulation: an investigation of emotional dynamics and body weight in romantic couples. Emotion, 15(1), 45–60.10.1037/a0038561CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 844–72.10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.844CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85.10.1177/1754073908097189CrossRef Google Scholar

Saxbe, D., & Repetti, R. L. (2010). For better or worse? Coregulation of couples’ cortisol levels and mood states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 92–103.10.1037/a0016959CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sbarra, D. A., & Hazan, C. (2008). Coregulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: an integrative analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(141), 141–67.10.1177/1088868308315702CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1307–51.10.1080/02699930902928969CrossRef Google Scholar

Schoebi, D. (2008). The coregulation of daily affect in marital relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 595–604.10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.595CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schoebi, D., & Randall, A. K. (2015). Emotional dynamics in intimate relationships. Emotion Review, 7(4), 342–48.10.1177/1754073915590620CrossRef Google Scholar

Sels, L., Ceulemans, E., Bulteel, K., & Kuppens, P. (2016). Emotional interdependence and well-being in close relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(283).10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00283CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Steenbeek, H., & van Geert, P. (2005). A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction during play of two children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 105–45.10.1080/17405620544000020CrossRef Google Scholar

Tiedens, L., & Leach, C. (2004). The Social Life of Emotions (Volume 2). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819568CrossRef Google Scholar

Timmons, A. C., Margolin, G., & Saxbe, D. E. (2015). Physiological linkage in couples and its implications for individual and interpersonal functioning: a literature review. Journal of Family Psychology. doi:10.1037/fam0000115CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Townsend, S. S., Kim, H. S., & Mesquita, B. (2014). Are you feeling what I'm feeling? Emotional similarity buffers stress. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(5), 526–33.10.1177/1948550613511499CrossRef Google Scholar

Tronick, E. Z. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist, 44(2), 112–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.112.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A., & Zochowski, M. (2005). Dynamics of social coordination: the synchronization of internal states in close relationships. Interaction Studies, 6(1), 35–52.CrossRef Google Scholar

Van der Giessen, D., Branje, S. J., Frijns, T., & Meeus, W. H. (2013). Dyadic variability in mother-adolescent interactions: developmental trajectories and associations with psychosocial functioning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 96–108.10.1007/s10964-012-9790-7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Van der Giessen, D., Hollenstein, T., Hale, W. W. III, et al. (2014). Emotional variability in mother-adolescent conflict interactions and internalizing problems of mothers and adolescents: dyadic and individual processes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(2), 339–53.Google Scholar

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar

Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In Ickes, W. J. (Ed.), Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 253–76). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Westman, M. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54(6), 717–51.10.1177/0018726701546002CrossRef Google Scholar

Wichers, M., Wigman, J. T., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2015). Micro-level affect dynamics in psychopathology viewed from complex dynamical system theory. Emotion Review, 7(4), 362–7.10.1177/1754073915590623CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilks, S. S. (1932). Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 24(3/4), 471–94.10.1093/biomet/24.3-4.471CrossRef Google Scholar

Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13(5), 803–10.10.1037/a0033839CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.