[Abridgement] = Averroes, . 2015. Averroès: Le philosophe et la Loi; Edition, traduction, et commentaire de l’Abrégé du Mustaṣfāʾ, ed. and tr. Bou Akl, Z.. Berlin.Google Scholar

[Appendix] = Averroes, . 1959. Ḍamīma, ed. Hourani, G. F.. Leiden.Google Scholar

[Comm. Medical Poem] = Averroes, . 2010. Avicennae Cantica, ed. and tr. Coullaut Cordero, J., Fernández Vallina, E., and Vázquez de Benito, C.. Salamanca.Google Scholar

[Comm. Parva Naturalia] = Averroes, . 1961. Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-Ḥiss wa-l-maḥsūs, ed. Gätje, H.. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

[Decisive Treatise] = Averroes, . 1959. Kitāb Faṣl al-maqāl, ed. Hourani, G. F.. Leiden.Google Scholar

[Ep. Metaphysics] = Averroes, . 1919. Compendio de Metafisica, ed. and tr. Quirós Rodríguez, C.. Madrid.Google Scholar

[Ep. On the Soul] = Averroes, . 1950. Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-Nafs, ed. al-Ahwānī, A. F.. Cairo.Google Scholar

[Ep. Physics] = Averroes, . 1983. Epitome in physicorum libros, ed. Puig Montada, J.. Madrid.Google Scholar

[Ep. Rhetoric] = Averroes, . 1977. Three Short Commentaries on Aristotle’s Topics, Rhetoric, and Poetics, ed. and tr. Butterworth, C. E.. Albany, NY: 167–99.Google Scholar

[Ep. Topics] = Averroes, . 1977. Three Short Commentaries on Aristotle’s Topics, Rhetoric, and Poetics, ed. and tr. Butterworth, C. E.. Albany, NY: 151–66.Google Scholar

[Exposition] = Averroes, . 1964. Al-Kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla fī ʿaqāʾid al-milla li-Ibn Rushd, ed. Qāsim, M.. Cairo.Google Scholar

[General Principles of Medicine] = Averroes, . 1987. Kitāb al-Kulliyyāt fī-l-ṭibb, vol. 1, ed. Besteiro, J. M. F. and de Morales, C. Á.. Madrid.Google Scholar

[Incoherence of the Incoherence] = Averroes, . 1930. Tahafot al-Tahafot, ed. Bouyges, M.. Beirut.Google Scholar

[Jurist’s Primer] = Averroes, . 2007. Bidāyat al-mujtahid wa-nihāyat al-muqtaṣid, vol. 6, ed. Muʿawwaḍ, ʿA. M.. Beirut.Google Scholar

[LC Metaphysics] = Averroes, . 1990–91. Tafsīr Mā baʿd aṭ-ṭabīʿat, 4 vols., ed. Bouyges, M.. Beirut.Google Scholar

[LC On the Heavens] = Averroes, . 2003. Averrois Cordubensis Commentum magnum super libro De celo et mundo Aristotelis, 2 vols., ed. Arnzen, R.. Leuven.Google Scholar

[LC On the Soul] = Averroes, . 1953. Averrois Cordubensis Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima libros, ed. Crawford, F. S.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

[LC Physics] = Averroes, . 1962. Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentariis, vol. 4. Frankfurt am Main. (Reprint of Averroes. 1562. Aristotelis omnia quae extant opera … Averrois Cordubensis in ea opera omnes qui ad haec usque tempora pervenere commentarii, vol. 4. Venetiis.)Google Scholar

[LC Posterior Analytics] = Averroes, . 1984. Sharḥ al-Burhān li-Arisṭū wa-Talkhīṣ al-Burhān, ed. Badawī, ʿA.. Kuwait.Google Scholar

[Paraph. On Generation and Corruption] = Averroes, . 2005. Mittlerer Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De generatione et corruptione, ed. Eichner, H.. Paderborn.Google Scholar

[Paraph. On the Soul] = Averroes, . 2002. Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima, ed. and tr. Ivry, A. L.. Provo, UT.Google Scholar

[Paraph. Republic] = Averroes, . 1956. Commentary on Plato’s Republic, ed. Rosenthal, E. I. J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

[Paraph. Rhetoric] = Averroes, . 2002. Commentaire moyen à la Rhétorique d’Aristote, 3 vols., ed. and tr. Aouad, M.. Paris.Google Scholar

[Paraph. Topics] = Averroes, . 1979. Commentarium Medium in Aristotelis Topica, ed. Butterworth, C. E. and Harīdī, A. ʿA.. Cairo.Google Scholar

[Questions on Logic] = Averroes, . 1983. Maqālāt fī l-manṭiq wa-l-ʿilm al-ṭabīʿī, ed. al-ʿAlawī, J.. Casablanca: 71–221.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1524. De venenis. Paris.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1877. Al-Qanūn fī l-Ṭibb, 3 vols. Cairo.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1949. Averrois Cordubensis Compendia librorum Aristotelis qui Parva naturalia vocantur, ed. Shields, A. L. and Blumberg, H.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1954a. Arisṭūṭālīs fī l-Nafs, al-ārāʾ al-ṭabīʿiyya al-mansūb ilā Flūṭarkhus, al-Ḥāss wa-l-maḥsūs li-Ibn Rushd, al-Nabāt al-mansūb ilā Arisṭūṭālīs, ed. Badawī, ʿA.. Cairo.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1954b. Tahafut Al-Tahafut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence), tr. van den Bergh, S.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1958. On Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione: Middle Commentary and Epitome, tr. Kurland, S.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1961. Epitome of “Parva naturalia”, tr. Blumberg, H.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1962. Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentariis, 12 vols. Frankfurt am Main. Originally published Venice, 1562–74.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1967. Averroes on the Harmony of Religion and Philosophy: A Translation, with Introduction and Notes, of Ibn Rushd’s Kitāb faṣl al-maqāl, with its Appendix (Ḍamīma) and an Extract from Kitāb al-kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla. Hourani, G. F.. London.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1972a. Ḍamīmat al-ʿilm al-ilāhī, ed. ʿImāra, M.. Cairo.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1972b. Faṣl al-maqāl fī-mā bayna l-ḥikma wa-l-sharīʿa min al-ittiṣāl, ed. ʿImāra, M.. Cairo.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1972c. Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-Ḥiss wa-l-maḥsūs, ed. Blumberg, H.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1974. Averroes on Plato’s “Republic”, tr. Lerner, R.. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1977. Three Short Commentaries on Aristotle’s Topics, Rhetoric, and Poetics, ed. and tr. Butterworth, C. E.. Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1982a. Bidāyat al-mujtahid wa-nihāyat al-muqtaṣib. Cairo.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1982b. The Epistle on the Possibility of Conjunction with the Active Intellect by Ibn Rushd with the Commentary of Moses Narboni, tr. Bland, K.. New York.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1984a. Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi. Averrois Opera. Commentaria Averrois in Galenum, ed. Vázquez de Benito, M. C.. Madrid.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1984b. Ibn Rushd’s Metaphysics: A Translation with Introduction of Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Book Lām, tr. Genequand, C.. Leiden.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1985. Epitome de Anima, ed. Nogales, S. Gómez. Madrid.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1986. Averroes’ De Substantia Orbis: Critical Edition of the Hebrew Text with English Translation and Commentary, ed. and tr. Hyman, A.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1987. La medicina de Averroes: Comentarios a Galeno, tr. Vázquez de Benito, M. C.. Zamora.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1994a. Al-Ḍarūrī fī uṣūl al-fiqh aw Mukhtaṣar al-Mustaṣfā, ed. al-ʿAlawī, J.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1994b. Risālat Mā baʿda l-ṭabīʿa, ed. Jihāmī, J.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1996. Commentum medium super libro Peri hermeneias Aristotelis translatio Wilhelmi de Luna attributa, ed. Hissette, R.. Leuven.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1998a. Al-Kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla fī ʿaqā’id al-milla, ed. al-Jābirī, M. ʿĀ.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1998b. L’intelligence et la pensée. Grand commentaire du De anima, livre III (429a10–435b25), 2nd edition, tr. de Libera, A.. Paris.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2001a. La Béatitude de l’âme: Éditions, traductions et études, ed. and tr. Geoffroy, M. and Steel, C.. Paris.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2001b. Decisive Treatise and Epistle Dedicatory, ed. and tr. Butterworth, C. E., Provo, UT.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2001c. Faith and Reason in Islam: Averroes’ Exposition of Religious Arguments, tr. Najjar, I.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2003a. Averrois Cordubensis Commentum magnum super libro De caelo et mundo Aristotelis, 2 vols., ed. Arnzen, R.. Louvain.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2003b. El libro de las generalidades de la medicina, tr. Vázquez de Benito, M. C.. Madrid.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2005. L’original arabe du grand commentaire d'Averroès au “De anima” d’Aristote, ed. Sirat, C. and Geoffroy, M.. Paris.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2006. The Distinguished Jurist’s Primer, 2 vols., tr. Nyazee, I. A. K., reviewed by M. Rauf, Abdul. Reading.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2008a. Al-Kulliyyāt fī l-ṭibb, 2nd edition, ed. ʿĀ. al-Jābirī, M.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2008b. Über den Intellekt: Auszüge aus seinen drei Kommentaren zu Aristoteles’ De anima. Arabisch–Lateinisch–Deutsch, ed. and tr. Wirmer, D.. Freiburg.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2009. Long Commentary on the De anima of Aristotle, tr. Taylor, R. C. and Druart, T.-A.. New Haven.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2010. Averroes on Aristotle’s Metaphysics: An Annotated Translation of the So-Called “Epitome,” tr. Arnzen, R.. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 1885. Die durch Averroes erhaltenen Fragmente Alexanders zur Metaphysik des Aristoteles, ed. and tr. Freudenthal, J.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 1887. Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora: De anima liber cum mantissa, ed. Bruns, I.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1900. Traité de l’âme, tr. Rodier, G.. Paris.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1907. De Anima, tr. Hicks, R. D.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1936. Aristotle’s Physics, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1949. Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1961. De Anima, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1963. Categories and De Interpretatione, tr. Ackrill, J. L.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1965. Aristote: Du ciel, ed. and tr. Moraux, P.. Paris.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1979. Al-Akhlāq: Taʾlīf Arisṭūṭālīs; Tarjamat Isḥāq ibn Ḥunayn, ed. Badawī, ʿA.. Kuwait.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1980. Manṭiq Arisṭū, 3 vols., ed. Badawī, ʿA.. Kuwait.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1984a. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1984b. Al-Ṭabīʿa: Tarjamat Isḥāq ibn Ḥunayn maʿa shurūḥ Ibn al-Samḥ wa-Ibn ʿAdī wa-Mattā ibn Yūnus wa-Abī l-Faraj ibn al-Ṭayyib, 2 vols. Cairo.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1992. Aristotle’s Physics: Books I and II, tr. Charlton, W.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1993a. De Anima: Books II and III (with Passages from Book I), tr. Hamlyn, D. W., with a report on recent work and a revised bibliography by Shields, C.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1993b. Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, tr. Barnes, J.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1994. Aristotle’s De anima Translated into Hebrew by Zeraḥyah ben Isaac ben Shealtiel Ḥen, ed. Bos, G.. Leiden.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1999. Al-Naṣṣ al-kāmil li-manṭiq Arisṭū, ed. Jabr, F.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2000. Physique, tr. Pellegrin, P.. Paris.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2004. On Memory, tr. Sorabji, R.. London.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2005. The Arabic Version of the Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Akasoy, A. and Fidora, A., tr. Dunlop, D. M.. Leiden.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2016. De Anima, tr. Shields, C.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Arnald of Villanova. 1975. Aphorismi de gradibus. In Arnaldi de Villanova Opera medica omnia, vol. II, ed. McVaugh, M.. Granada.Google Scholar

Arnald of Villanova. 2000. Tractatus de intentione medicorum. In Arnaldi de Villanova Opera medica omnia, vol. V.1, ed. McVaugh, M. R.. Granada.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1877. Al-Qānūn fī l-ṭibb, 3 vols. Cairo.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1892. Al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, ed. Forget, J.. Leiden.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1952. Avicenna’s Psychology: An English Translation of Kitāb al-Najāt, Book II, Chapter VI, tr. Rahman, F.. London.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1956. Al-Shifāʾ: Al-Burhān, ed. Afīfī, A. ʿ and Madkūr, I.. Cairo.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1959. Avicenna’s De Anima, Being the Psychological Part of Kitāb al-Shifāʾ, ed. Rahman, F.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1960. Al-Shifāʾ: Al-Ilāhiyyāt, ed. Qanawātī, J. Sh. and Zāyid, S.. Cairo.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1984a. Al-Aḍḥawiyya fī l-maʿād, ed. ʿĀṣī, Ḥ.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1984b. Avicenna: Remarks and Admonitions Part One: Logic, tr. Inati, S. C.. Toronto.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1985. Kitāb al-Najāt fī l-ḥikma al-manṭiqiyya wa-l-ṭabīʿiyya wa-l-ilāhiyya, ed. Fakhry, M.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1991. Risāla fī Ithbāt al-nubuwwāt, ed. Marmura, M. E.. Cairo.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2010. Avicennae Cantica: Texto árabe, versión latina y traducción española, ed. and tr. Cordero, J. C., Fernández Vallina, E., and Vázquez de Benito, M. C.. Salamanca.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2011. Avicenna’s Deliverance: Logic, tr. Ahmed, A. Q.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2013. Al-ʿIbāra: Avicenna’s Commentary on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione, Part One and Part Two, tr. Bäck, A.. Munich.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2014. Commentaire sur le livre Lambda de la Métaphysique d’Aristote, ed. and tr. Sebti, M., Geoffroy, M., and Janssens, J.. Paris.Google Scholar

Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis. 1889–97. Paris.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1926. Rasāʾil al-Fārābī. Hyderabad.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1938. Risalat fī’l-ʿAql, ed. Bouyges, M.. Beirut.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1948. Iḥṣāʾ al-ʿulūm, ed. Amīn, ʿU.. Cairo.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1964. Risāla fī Ārāʾ ahl al-madīna al-fāḍila, ed. Dieterici, F.. Leiden.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1969. Alfarabi’s Book of Letters, ed. Mahdi, M.. Beirut.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1971. Deux ouvrages inédits sur la rhétorique, ed. Langhade, J. and Grignaschi, M.. Beirut.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1981. Al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione, tr. Zimmermann, F. W.. London.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1985. Al-Farabi on the Perfect State, tr. Walzer, R.. Oxford.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1986. “Kitāb al-Qiyās,” in al-Manṭiq ʿinda l-Fārābī, ed. al-ʿAjam, R., vol. 2. Beirut. 11–64.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1986–87. Kitāb al-Burhān wa-Kitāb Sharāʾiṭ al-yaqīn, ed. Fakhry, M. and al-ʿAjam, R., in Al-Manṭiq ʿinda l-Fārābī, vol. 4. Beirut.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 1987. Al-Manṭiqiyyāt li-l-Fārābī, ed. Dānis Pažūh, M. T.. Qom.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 2001. Alfarabi: The Political Writings, Selected Aphorisms, and Other Texts, tr. Butterworth, C. E.. Ithaca.Google Scholar

al-Fārābī, . 2008. L’armonia delle opinioni dei due sapienti, il divino Platone e Aristotele, ed. and tr. Martini Bonadeo, C.. Pisa.Google Scholar

al-Ghazālī, . 1904–6. Al-mustaṣfā min ʿilm al-uṣūl. Būlāq.Google Scholar

al-Ghazālī, . 1959. Al-Munqid min aḍālal [sic] (Erreur et délivrance), ed. and tr. Jabre, F.. Beirut.Google Scholar

al-Ghazālī, . 1997. Al-Mustaṣfā min ʿilm al-uṣūl, 2 vols., ed. al-Ashqar, M. S.. Beirut.Google Scholar

al-Kindī, . 2012. The Philosophical Works of al-Kindī, tr. Adamson, P. and Pormann, P. E.. Karachi.Google Scholar

al-Marrākushī, ʿAbd al-Wāḥid. 1847. The History of the Almohades, ed. Dozy, R. P. A.. Leiden.Google Scholar

al-Ṭabarī, ʿAlī b. Sahl Rabbān. 1928. Firdaws al-ḥikma, ed. Ṣiddīqī, M. Z.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Ibn al-Abbār, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad. 1887. Complementum Libri as-Sila (Kitāb al-Takmila li-Kitāb al-Ṣila), 2 vols., ed. Codera y Zaydin, F.. Madrid.Google Scholar

Ibn Abī Uṣaybiʿa, . 1882. ʿUyūn al-anbāʾ fī ṭabaqāt al-aṭibbāʾ, 2 vols., ed. Müller, A.. Cairo. (Repr. 1995. Frankfurt am Main.)Google Scholar

Ibn Bājja, . 1973. Rasāʾil falsafiyya li-l-Kindī wa-l-Fārābī wa-Ibn Bājja wa-Ibn ʿAdī, ed. Badawī, ʿA.. Benghazi.Google Scholar

Ibn Bājja, . 1983. Rasāʾil falsafiyya: Nuṣūṣ falsafiyya ghayr manshūra, ed. al-ʿAlawī, J.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Ibn Bājja, . 2010. Tadbīr al-mutawaḥḥid. In La conduite de l’isolé et deux autres épîtres, ed. and tr. Genequand, C.. Paris.Google Scholar

Ibn Khaldūn, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. 1971. Taʾrīkh Ibn Khaldūn al-musammā bi-Kitāb al-ʿIbar wa-dīwān al-mubtadaʾ wa-l-khabar fī ayyām al-ʿArab wa-l-ʿAjam wa-l-Barbar wa-man ʿāṣarahum min dhawī l-sulṭān al-akbar. Beirut.Google Scholar

Ibn Khallikān, . 1868. Ibn Khallikan’s Biographical Dictionary, vol. 3, tr. de Slane, W. Mac Guckin. Paris.Google Scholar

Ibn Khallikān, . 1977. Wafayāt al-aʿyān wa-anbāʾ abnāʾ al-zamān, vol. 5, ed. Abbās, I.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Ibn al-Qalānisī, Abū Yaʿlā. 1908. Taʾrīkh Abī Yaʿlā Ḥamza ibn al-Qalānisī l-maʿrūf bi-Dhayl taʾrīkh Dimashq tatlūhu nukhab min tawārīkh Ibn al-Azraq al-Fāriqī wa-Sibṭ ibn al-Jawzī wa-l-Ḥāfiẓ al-Dhahabī. Beirut.Google Scholar

Ibn al-Qaṭṭān, Ḥasan ibn ʿAlī. 1990. Nuẓum al-jumān li-tartīb mā salafa min akhbār al-zamān, ed. ʿAlī Makkī, Maḥmūd. Beirut.Google Scholar

Ibn Tūmart, Muḥammad. 1903. Le livre de Mohammed ibn Toumert Mahdi des Almohades, ed. Luciani, J. D. and al-Kamāl, M.. Algiers.Google Scholar

Ibn Zuhr, Abū Marwān ʿAbd al-Malik. 1991. Kitāb al-Taysīr fī l-mudāwā wa-l-tadbīr. Rabat.Google Scholar

Ibn Zuhr, Abū Marwān ʿAbd al-Malik. 2010. Le traité médical (Kitāb al-Taysīr), ed. Bouamrane, F.. Paris.Google Scholar

Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʾ, . 1957. Rasāʾil Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʾ wa-khillān al-wafāʾ, 4 vols., ed. Ghālib, M., Beirut.Google Scholar

Nifo, Agostino. 1554. Commentaria in Aristotelis Priora Analytica. Venice.Google Scholar

Philoponus, John. 1887. Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Physicorum libros tres priores commentaria, ed. Vitelli, H.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Pietro d’Abano, . 1483. Conciliator. Venice.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Apollonius. 1979. Sirr al-khalīqa, ed. Weisser, U.. Aleppo.Google Scholar

(Pseudo-)Simplicius. 1882. Simplicii in libros Aristotelis De anima commentaria, ed. Hayduck, M.. Berlin.Google Scholar

(Pseudo-)Simplicius. 2000. On Aristotle’s On the Soul 3.1–5, tr. Blumenthal, H. J.. London.Google Scholar

Simplicius. 1882. Simplicii in Aristotelis Physicorum libros quattuor priores commentaria, ed. Diels, H.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Simplicius. 1894. Simplicii in Aristotelis De caelo commentaria, ed. Heiberg, I. L., Berlin.Google Scholar

Simplicius. 1991. Commentaire sur les Catégories d’Aristote: Chapters 2–4, tr. Hoffmann, P. with Hadot, I. and commentary by Luna, C.. Paris.Google Scholar

Themistius. 1899. Themistii in libros Aristotelis De anima paraphrasis, ed. Heinze, R.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Themistius. 1973. An Arabic Translation of Themistius’ Commentary on Aristoteles De Anima, ed. Lyons, M. C.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Themistius. 1996. On Aristotle on the Soul, tr. Todd, R. B.. London.Google Scholar

Zabarella, Jacopo. 1609. Commentarii Jac. Zabarellae Patavini, In III. Aristot. Libros de Anima. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Abrahamov, B. 2011. “Ibn Rushd and the Kalām.” In La lumière de l’intellect. La pensée scientifique et philosophique d’Averroès dans son temps, ed. Hasnawi, A., 481–86. Leuven.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2007. Al-Kindī. New York.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2010. “Yaḥyā Ibn ʿAdī and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton.” Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 21: 343–74.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2013a. “From the Necessary Existent to God.” In Adamson 2013b: 170–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamson, P. 2013b. Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays, ed. Adamson, P.. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamson, P. 2018. “Health in Arabic Ethical Works.” In Health: A History, 103–135. New York.Google Scholar

Adamson, P., and Taylor, R. C. 2005. The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Al-ʿAlawī, Jamāl al-Dīn. 1986. Al-Matn al-rushdī: Madkhal li-qirāʾa jadīda. Casablanca.Google Scholar

Ansari, A. S. 2012. “Ḥisba.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition [EI2], ed. Bearman, P. J., Bianquis, T., et al. Leiden.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1992. “Les fondements de la Rhétorique d’Aristote reconsidérés par Fārābī, ou le concept de point de vue immédiat et commun.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 2: 133–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aouad, M. 2007a. Le Livre de la Rhétorique du philosophe et medecin Ibn Ṭumlūs. Paris.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 2007b. “La critique radicale du témoignage, de la loi positive et du consensus par Averroès.” In Averroès et les averroïsmes juif et latin, ed. Brenet, J.-B., 161–81. Turnhout.Google Scholar

Aouad, M., and Woerther, F. 2009. “Le Commentaire par Averroès du chapitre 9 du livre X de l’Éthique à Nicomaque: Pédagogie de la contrainte, habitudes et lois.” Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 67: 353–80.Google Scholar

Arfa-Mensia, M. 1999. “Malāmiḥ min naẓariyya Ibn Rushd fī-l-nubuwwa.” In Ibn Rushd faylasūf al-sharq wa-l-gharb, vol. 1: 219–57. Tunis.Google Scholar

Arfa-Mensia, M. 2011. “Ibn Rushd et le ẓāhirisme pratique.” In La lumière de l’intellect: La pensée scientifique et philosophique d’Averroès dans son temps, ed. Hasnawi, A., 457–70. Leuven.Google Scholar

Arfa-Mensia, M. 2012. “Regards d’Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwaynī.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 22: 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnaldez, R. 1956. Grammaire et théologie chez Ibn Ḥazm de Cordoue. Paris.Google Scholar

Arnzen, R. 2010. “Averroes on the Structure of Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 21: 375–410.Google Scholar

ʿArshī, I. ʿA. 1971. Catalogue of the Arabic Manuscripts in Raza Library, Rampur, vol. 4: Sufism, Holy Scriptures, Logic and Philosophy. Rampur.Google Scholar

Baffioni, C. 2004. “Further Notes on Averroes’ Embryology and the Question of the ‘Female Sperm.’” In Averroes and the Aristotelian Heritage, ed. Baffioni, C., 159–72. Napoli.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1993. “Commentary.” In Aristotle: Posterior Analytics, tr. with a commentary by Barnes, J.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Berman, L. V. 1967a. “Greek into Hebrew: Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles, Fourteenth-Century Philosopher and Translator.” In Jewish Medieval and Renaissance Studies, ed. Altmann, A., 289–320. Cambridge. MA.Google Scholar

Berman, L. V. 1967b. “Revised Hebrew Translation of Averroes’ Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics.” Seventy-Fifth Anniversary Volume of the Jewish Quarterly Review 57: 104–20.Google Scholar

Berman, L. V. 1967c. “Excerpts from the Lost Arabic Original of Ibn Rushd’s Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics.” Oriens 20: 31–59.Google Scholar

Berman, L. V. 1978. “Ibn Rushd’s Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics in the Medieval Hebrew Literature.” In Multiple Averroès, ed. Jolivet, J., 287–322. Paris.Google Scholar

Berman, L. V. 1999. Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics in the Hebrew Version of Samuel ben Judah. Jerusalem.Google Scholar

Bin Sharīfa, M. 1999. Ibn Rushd al-Ḥafīd: Sīra wathāʾiqiyya. Casablanca.Google Scholar

Berti, E. 1991. “Les méthodes d’argumentation et de démonstration dans la Physique.” In La Physique d’Aristote et les conditions d’une science de la nature, ed. de Gandt, F. and Souffrin, P., 53–72. Paris.Google Scholar

Berti, E. 2000. “Unmoved Mover(s) as Efficient Cause(s) in Metaphysics Λ 6.” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda, ed. Frede, M. and Charles, D., 181–206. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertolacci, A. 2007. “Avicenna and Averroes on the Proof of God’s Existence and the Subject-Matter of Metaphysics.” Medioevo 32: 61–98.Google Scholar

Bertolacci, A. 2013. “Averroes against Avicenna on Human Spontaneous Generation: The Starting-Point of a Lasting Debate.” In Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, ed. Akasoy, A. and Giglioni, G., 37–54. Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Bertolacci, A. Forthcoming. “The Andalusian Revolt against Avicennian Metaphysics: Averroes’ Criticisms of Avicenna in the Commentaries on Aristotle.” In Wirmer forthcoming.Google Scholar

Black, D. L. 1990. Logic and Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, D. L. 1993. “Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions.” Dialogue 32: 219–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, D. L. 1996. “Memory, Individuals, and the Past in Averroes’ Psychology.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5: 161–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, D. L. 2005. “Psychology: Soul and Intellect.” In Adamson and Taylor 2005: 308–26.Google Scholar

Black, D. L. 2006. “Knowledge (ʿilm) and Certitude (yaqīn) in al-Fārābī’s Epistemology.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16: 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, D. L. 2008. “Al-Fārābī on Meno’s Paradox.” In In the Age of al-Fārābī: Arabic Philosophy in the Fourth/Tenth Century, ed. Adamson, P., 15–34. London.Google Scholar

Black, D. L. 2013. “Certitude, Justification, and the Principles of Knowledge in Avicenna’s Epistemology.” In Adamson 2013b: 120–42.Google Scholar

Bodéüs, R. 1982. Le philosophe et la cité: Recherches sur les rapports entre morale et politique dans la pensée d’Aristote. Paris.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle Biology, ed. Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G., 120–66. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 1991. “Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science: Physics I.” In Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, ed. Judson, L., 1–29. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 1999. “The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic.” In From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, ed. Sim, M., 57–105. Lanham.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 2009. “Two Standards for Inquiry in Aristotle’s De Caelo.” In A Companion to Aristotle’s Cosmology: Collected Papers on De Caelo, ed. Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C., 51–82. Leiden.Google Scholar

Bosworth, C. E. 1970. “An Early Arabic Mirror for Princes: Ṭāhir Dhū al-Yamīnain’s Epistle to His Son ʿAbdallāh (206/821).” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 29.1: 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bou Akl, Z. 2016. “La philosophie comme pratique: erreur et droit à l’erreur dans la pensée d’Averroès.” Les Études philosophiques 2: 269–82.Google Scholar

Bouhafa, F. 2016. “Natural Justice under the Scope of Rhetoric: The Written and Unwritten Law in Ibn Rushd’s Legal and Political Philosophy.” PhD diss., Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Brunschvig, R. 1970. “Logic and Law in Classical Islam.” In Logic and Classical Islamic Culture, ed. von Grunebaum, G., 9–20. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Bürgel, J. 1967. “Averroes ‘contra Galenum’. Das Kapitel von der Atmung im Colliget des Averroes als ein Zeugnis mittelalterlich-islamischer Kritik an Galen.” Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, philosophisch-historische Klasse 9: 265–340.Google Scholar

Butterworth, C. 1966. “Rhetoric and Reason: A Study of Averroes’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” PhD diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Butterworth, C. 1972. “Rhetoric and Islamic Political Philosophy.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 3.2: 187–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butterworth, C. 1984. “The Rhetorician and His Relationship to the Community: Three Accounts of Aristotle’s Rhetoric.” In Islamic Theology and Philosophy, ed. Marmura, M. E., 111–36. Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Butterworth, C. 1985. “Ethics and Classical Islamic Philosophy: A Study of Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic.” In Ethics in Islam, ed. Hovannisian, R. G., 17–45. Malibu.Google Scholar

Butterworth, C. 1997. “Twelve Treatises in Search of a Title: Averroes’ Short Commentaries on Aristotle’s Logic.” In Langages et Philosophie: hommage à Jean Jolivet, ed. de Libera, A., Elamrani-Jamal, A., and Gallonier, A., 99–108. Paris.Google Scholar

Butterworth, C. 1998. “Averroës’ Platonization of Aristotle’s Art of Rhetoric.” In La Rhétorique d’Aristote: traditions et commentaires de l’Antiquité au XVIIe siècle, ed. Dahan, G. and Rosier-Catach, I., 227–40. Paris.Google Scholar

Butterworth, C. 2007. “Philosophy of Law in Medieval Judaism and Islam.” In A History of Philosophy of Law from Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics, ed. Miller, F., vol. 6: 219–42. Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Calmard, J. 2012. “Mudjtahid.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition [EI2], ed. Bearman, P. J., Bianquis, T., et al. Leiden.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. 2013. “La substance première d’Averroès entre logique et métaphysique.” In Aristotle’s Categories in the Byzantine, Arabic and Latin traditions, ed. Ebbesen, S., Marenbon, J., and Thom, P., 87–138. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. 2014. “Signe physique, signe métaphysique: Averroès contre Avicenne sur le statut épistémologique des sciences.” In Nature et sagesse: Les rapports entre physique et métaphysique dans la tradition aristotélicienne, ed. Cerami, C., 429–74. Louvain.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. 2015a. Génération et substance. Aristote et Averroès entre physique et métaphysique. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerami, C. 2015b. “Induction et certitude dans le Grand Commentaire d’Averroès aux Seconds Analytiques.” In Raison et démonstration: Les commentaires médiévaux sur les Seconds Analytiques, ed. Biard, J., 47–69. Turnhout.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerami, C. 2015c. “L’éternel par soi. Averroès contre al-Fārābī sur les enjeux épistémologiques de Phys. VIII 1.” In Averroes’ Natural Philosophy and Its Reception in the Latin West, ed. Bakker, P., 1–36. Leuven.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. 2016a. “Essence, accident et nécessité: La notion de par soi chez Averroès.” Les Études philosophiques 162.2: 217–41.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. 2016b. “Le plaisir des femmes selon Aristote: Averroès contre Galien sur Natura nihil facit frustra.” Philosophie Antique 16: 63–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerami, C. Forthcoming (a). “A Map of Averroes’ Criticisms against Avicenna: Natural Philosophy I.” In Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Natural Philosophy, ed. A. Bertolacci and D. N. Hasse.Google Scholar

Cerami, C. Forthcoming (b). “Le commun avant le propre. Le rôle de Seconds Analytiques I 4–5 dans l’organisation du corpus de philosophie naturelle d’après Averroès.” In Wirmer forthcoming.Google Scholar

Chandelier, J. 2010. “Théorie et définition des poisons à la fin du Moyen Âge.” Cahiers de Recherches Médiévales 17: 23–38.Google Scholar

Cruz Hernández, M. 1997. Abū-l-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Ruŝd (Averroes): Vida, Obra, Pensamiento, Influencia. Madrid.Google Scholar

Daiber, H., 1986a. “New Manuscript Findings from Indian Libraries.” Manuscripts of the Middle East 1: 26–48.Google Scholar

Daiber, H., 1986b. “Semitische Sprachen als Kulturvermittler zwischen Antike und Mittelalter: Stand und Aufgaben der Forschung.” Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 136: 292–313.Google Scholar

Daiber, H., 1997. “Salient Trends of the Arabic Aristotle.” In The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism, ed. Endress, G. and Kruk, R., 29–41. Leiden.Google Scholar

Dales, R. C. 1984. “The Origin of the Doctrine of the Double Truth.” Viator 15: 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalimier, C. 1998. “La saisie des principes physiques chez Aristote: Simplicius contre Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” Oriens-Occidens 2: 77–94.Google Scholar

Davidson, H. A. 1987. Proofs for Eternity, Creation and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. New York.Google Scholar

Davidson, H. A. 1992. Alfarabi, Avicenna and Averroes, on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Libera, A. 1997. “Preface.” In E. Renan, Averroes et l’Averroisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, M. 2003. “La definizione delle sostanze sensibili nel Commento Grande (Tafsīr) di Averroè a Metafisica Z 10.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 14: 27–63.Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, M. 2006. “Averroes on the Species of Celestial Bodies.” Miscellanea mediaevalia 33: 438–64.Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, M. 2007. “Individuation by Matter in Averroes’ Metaphysics.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18: 187–210.Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, M. 2009. “Demonstration and First Philosophy: Averroes on Met. Zeta as a Demonstrative Examination (al-faḥṣ al-burhānī).” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 20: 95–126.Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, M. 2014. “The Commentator: Averroes’ Reading of the Metaphysics.” In A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Metaphysics, ed. Amerini, F. and Galluzzo, G., 59–94. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Giovanni, M. 2017. Averroè. Rome.Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, M., and Primavesi, O. 2016. “Who Wrote Alexander’s Commentary on Metaphysics Λ? New Light on the Syro-Arabic Tradition.” In Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda: New Essays, ed. Horn, C., 11–66. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donati, S. 1988. “La dottrina delle dimensioni indeterminate in Egidio Romano.” Medioevo 14: 149–234.Google Scholar

Druart, T.-A. 1993. “Averroes on God’s Knowledge of Being qua Being.” Anaquel de Estudios Árabes 4: 39–57.Google Scholar

Dutton, Y. 1994. “The Introduction to Ibn Rushd’s Bidāyat al-Mujtahid.” Islamic Law and Society 1.2: 188–205.Google Scholar

Elamrani-Jamal, A. 1995. “Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d’Aristote.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 5: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elamrani-Jamal, A. 2000. “La demonstration du signe (burhān al-dalīl) selon Ibn Rushd (Averroès).” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11: 113–31.Google Scholar

Elamrani-Jamal, A. 2003. “De anima. Tradition arabe.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques: Supplément, ed. Goulet, Richard, 346–58. Paris.Google Scholar

El-Shamsy, A. 2015. “Fiqh, faqīh, fuqahāʾ.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 3rd edition [EI3], ed. Fleet, K., Krämer, G., et al. Leiden.Google Scholar

Emon, A. 2010. Islamic Natural Law Theories. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endress, G. 1997. “L’Aristote arabe: Réception, autorité et transformation du premier maitre.” Medioevo 23: 1–42.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1999. “Averrois Opera: A Bibliography of Editions and Contributions to the Text.” In Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition, ed. Endress, G. and Aertsen, J. A. with Braub, K., 339–81. Leiden.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 2006. “The Cycle of Knowledge: Intellectual Traditions and Encyclopaedias of the Rational Sciences in Arabic Islamic Hellenism.” In Organizing Knowledge: Encyclopaedic Activities in the Pre-Eighteenth Century Islamic World, ed. Endress, G. and Filali-Ansary, A., 103–33. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endress, G. 2012. “Platonizing Aristotle: The Concept of ‘Spiritual’ (rūḥānī) as a Keyword of the Neoplatonic Strand in Early Arabic Aristotelianism.” Studia graeco-arabica 2: 265–79.Google Scholar

Feldman, N. R. 1994. “Reading the Nicomachean Ethics with Ibn Rushd.” DPhil. thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar

Fierro, M. 1999. “The Legal Policies of the Almohad Caliphs and Ibn Rushd’s Bidāyat al-mujtahid.” Journal of Islamic Studies 10.3: 226–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, M. 1997. “Ibn Tūmart’s Teachers: The Relationship with al-Ghazālī.” Al-Qanṭara 18: 305–29.Google Scholar

Fletcher, M. 2012. “The Doctrine of Divine Unity: The Almohad Creed.” In Medieval Iberia: Readings from Christian, Muslim, and Jewish Sources, ed. Constable, O. R., 190–97. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Frank, R. M. 1992. “The Science of Kalām.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 2: 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fromherz, A. J. 2010. The Almohads: The Rise of an Islamic Empire. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardet, L., and Anawati, M.-M. 1970. Introduction à la théologie musulmane. Essai de théologie comparée. Paris.Google Scholar

Gätje, H. 1964. “Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator.” Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 114: 59–65.Google Scholar

Gätje, H. 1965. “Die ‘inneren Sinne’ bei Averroes.” Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 115: 255–93.Google Scholar

Gätje, H. 1977. “Bemerkungen zur arabischen Fassung der Paraphrase der aristotelischen Schrift über die Seele durch Themistios.” Der Islam 54: 272–91.Google Scholar

Gätje, H. 1980. “Probleme der Colliget-Forschung.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 130: 278–303.Google Scholar

Gätje, H. 1986. “Die Vorworte zum Colliget des Averroes.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 136: 402–27.Google Scholar

Gauthier, L. 1909. La Théorie d’Ibn Rochd (Averroès) sur les rapports de la religion et de la philosophie. Paris.Google Scholar

Gauthier, R. A., and Jolif, J.-Y. 1970. L’Éthique à Nicomaque: Introduction, Louvain.Google Scholar

Genequand, C. 2012. “Théologie et philosophie. La providence chez al-Fārābī et l’authenticité de l’Harmonie des opinions des deux sages.” Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 64: 195–211.Google Scholar

Geoffroy, M. 1999. “L’Almohadisme théologique d’Averroès (Ibn Rušd).” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 66: 9–47.Google Scholar

Geoffroy, M. 2005a. “À propos de l’almohadisme d’Averroès: L’anthropomorphisme (taǧsīm) dans la seconde version du Kitāb al-Kašf ʿan manāhiǧ al-adilla.” In Los Almohades: Problemas y perspectivas, ed. Cressier, P., Fierro, M., and Molina, L., vol. 2: 853–94. Madrid.Google Scholar

Geoffroy, M. 2005b. “Averroè.” In Storia della filosofia nell’Islam medievale, ed. D’Ancona, C., vol. 2: 723–82. Torino.Google Scholar

Geoffroy, M., and Steel, C. 2001. “À la recherche de la Béatitude.” Introduction to Averroes 2001a.Google Scholar

Gersh, S. E. 1978. From Iamblichus to Eriugena: An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibb, H. 1962. Mohammedanism: A Historical Survey. New York.Google Scholar

Griffel, F. 2002. “The Relationship between Averroes and al-Ghazālī as It Presents Itself in Averroes’ Early Writings, Especially in His Commentary on al-Ghazālī’s al-Mustaṣfā.” In Medieval Philosophy and the Classical Tradition In Islam, Judaism, and Christianity, ed. Inglis, J., 51–63. Richmond, UK.Google Scholar

Griffel, F. 2005. “Ibn Tūmart’s Rational Proof for God’s Existence and Unity, and His Connection to the Niẓāmiyya Madrasa in Baghdad.” In Los Almohades: Problemas y perspectivas, ed. Cressier, P., Fierro, M., and Molina, L., vol. 2: 753–813. Madrid.Google Scholar

Griffel, F. 2009. Al-Ghazālī’s Philosophical Theology. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutas, D. 1988. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutas, D. 1993. “Aspects of Literary Form and Genre in Arabic Logical Works.” In Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts: The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions, ed. Burnett, C., 29–76. London.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 2002. “The Study of Arabic Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: An Essay on the Historiography of Arabic Philosophy.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 29.1: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutas, D. 2003. “Medical Theory and Scientific Method in the Age of Avicenna.” In Before and after Avicenna, ed. Reisman, D. C. and al-Rahim, A. H., 145–62. Leiden.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 2012. “The Empiricism of Avicenna.” Oriens 40: 391–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutas, D. 2014. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works, 2nd edition. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gyekye, K. 1989. “Al-Fārābī on the Logic of the Arguments of the Muslim Philosophical Theologians.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27.1: 135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallaq, W. B. 1984. “Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?” International Journal of Middle East Studies 16.1: 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallaq, W. B. 1989. “Non-Analogical Arguments in Sunni Juridical Qiyās.” Arabica 36: 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallaq, W. B. 1990. “On Inductive Corroboration, Probability and Certainty in Sunni Legal Thought.” In Islamic Law and Jurisprudence, ed. Heer, N., 3–31. Seattle.Google Scholar

Hallaq, W. B. 1999. “The Authenticity of Prophetic Ḥadīth: A Pseudo-Problem.” Studia Islamica 89: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallaq, W. B. 2009a. Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallaq, W. B. 2009b. Sharīʿa: Theory, Practice, and Modern Transformations. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansberger, R. 2007. “The Transmission of Aristotle’s Parva Naturalia in Arabic.” DPhil. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Hansberger, R. 2008. “How Aristotle Came to Believe in God-Given Dreams: The Arabic Version of De divinatione per somnum.” In Dreaming across Boundaries: The Interpretation of Dreams in Islamic Lands, ed. Ashtiany, M., 50–77. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Hansberger, R. 2010. “Kitāb al-Ḥiss wa-l-maḥsūs: Aristotle’s Parva naturalia in Arabic Guise.” In Les Parva naturalia d’Aristote: Fortune antique et médiévale, ed. Grellard, C. and Morel, P.-M, 143–62. Paris.Google Scholar

Hansberger, R. 2014. “The Arabic Adaptation of the Parva Naturalia (Kitāb al-Ḥiss wa-l-maḥsūs).” Studia Graeco-Arabica 4: 301–14.Google Scholar

Hansberger, R. 2017. “Length and Shortness of Life between Philosophy and Medicine: The Arabic Aristotle and His Medical Readers.” In Philosophy and Medicine in the Formative Period of Islam, ed. Adamson, P. and Pormann, P. E., 48–74. London.Google Scholar

Hansberger, R. Forthcoming (a). “The Arabic Parva Naturalia.” In Noétique et théorie de la connaissance dans la philosophie arabo-musulmane des IXe–XVIIe siècles, ed. M. Sebti and D. De Smet.Google Scholar

Hansberger, R. Forthcoming (b). “Representation of Which Reality? ‘Spiritual Forms’ and ‘Maʿānī’ in the Arabic Adaptation of Aristotle’s Parva Naturalia.” In The Parva Naturalia in Greek, Arabic, Latin and Hebrew Texts: Supplementing the Science of the Soul, ed. B. Bydén and F. Radovic.Google Scholar

Harvey, S. 1983. “Hebrew Translation of Averroes’ Prooemium to His Long Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 52: 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, S. 1991. “Averroes’ Use of Examples in His Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics, and Some Remarks on His Role as Commentator.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7: 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, S. 2004. “The Author’s Introduction as a Key to Understanding Trends in Islamic Philosophy.” In Words, Texts and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea: Studies on the Sources, Contents and Influences of Islamic Civilization and Arabic Philosophy and Science, ed. Arnzen, R. and Thielmann, J., 15–32. Louvain.Google Scholar

Harvey, S. 2007. “The Nature and Importance of Averroes’ Middle Commentary on the Ethics and the Extent of Its Influence on Medieval Jewish Thought.” In Averroès et les averroïsmes juif et latin, ed. Brenet, J.-B., 257–73. Turnhout.Google Scholar

Harvey, S. Forthcoming. “Unfounded Assumptions: Reassessing the Differences between the Short and Middle Commentaries and Their Chronology.” In Wirmer forthcoming.Google Scholar

Harvey, S., and Woerther, F. 2014. “Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics.” Oriens 42: 254–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasnawi, A. 1991. “Aspects de la synthèse avicennienne.” In Penser avec Aristote, ed. Sinaceur, M. A., 227–44. Toulouse.Google Scholar

Hasnawi, A. 2001. “Topic and Analysis: The Arabic Tradition.” In Whose Aristotle? Whose Aristotelianism?, ed. Sharples, R. W., 28–62. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Hasnawi, A. 2002. “La physique du Šifā’: aperçus sur sa structure et son contenu.” In Avicenna and His Heritage, ed. Janssens, J. and De Smet, D., 67–80. Leuven.Google Scholar

Hasnawi, A. 2009. “Topique et syllogistique: La tradition arabe (al-Fārābī et Averroès).” In Les lieux de l’argumentation: Histoire du syllogisme topique d’Aristote à Leibniz, ed. Biard, J. and Mariani-Zini, F., 191–226. Turnhout.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasnawi, A. 2013. “L’âge de la demonstration: Logique, science et histoire; Al-Fārābī, Avicenne, Avempace, Averroès.” In Circulation des savoirs autour de la Méditerranée: Philosophie et sciences (IXe–XVIIe siècle), ed. Vescovini, G. Federici and Hasnawi, A., 257–81. Fiesole.Google Scholar

Hasnawi, A., and Hodges, W. 2016. “Arabic Logic up to Avicenna.” In Novaes and Read 2016, 45–66.Google Scholar

Hasse, D. N. 2007. “Spontaneous Generation and the Ontology of Forms in Greek, Arabic, and Medieval Latin Sources.” In Classical Arabic Philosophy: Sources and Reception, ed. Adamson, P., 150–75. London.Google Scholar

Hasse, D. N. 2010. “The Soul’s Faculties.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Pasnau, R. with van Dyke, C., vol. 1: 305–19. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hasse, D. N. 2015. “Averroes’ Critique of Ptolemy and Its Reception by John of Jandun and Agostino Nifo.” In Averroes’ Natural Philosophy and Its Reception in the Latin West, ed. Bakker, P. J. J. M., 69–88. Leuven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hintikka, J. 1973. Time and Modality: Studies in Aristotle’s Theory of Modality. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hissette, R. 1977. Enquête sur les 219 articles condamnés à Paris le 7 mars 1277. Louvain.Google Scholar

Hourani, G. 1976. “Ghazali’s Ethics of Action.” Journal of American Oriental Society 96.1: 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 2000. “La formulation logique de l’argumentation dans les commentaires d’Averroès au De Caelo.” In Le commentaire entre tradition et innovation, ed. Goulet, M.-O., 386–95. Paris.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 2002. “Logique et physique: la théorie aristotélicienne de la science interprétée par Averroès.” Medioevo 27: 141–64.Google Scholar

Huici Miranda, A. 1956. Historia política del imperio almohade, vol. 1. Tetuán.Google Scholar

Imbach, R. 1991. “L’Averroïsme Latin du XIIIe siècle.” In Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novocento, ed. Imbach, R. and Maierù, A., 191–208. Rome.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford.Google Scholar

Iskandar, A. Z. 1976. “An Attempted Reconstruction of the Late Alexandrian Medical Curriculum.” Medical History 20: 235–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ivry, A. L. 2001. “The Arabic Text of Aristotle’s De Anima and Its Translator.” Oriens 36: 59–77.Google Scholar

Jacquart, D. 1998. La médecine médiévale dans le cadre parisien. Paris.Google Scholar

Jacquart, D., and Micheau, F. 1990. La médecine arabe et l’Occident médiéval. Paris.Google Scholar

Janos, D. 2015. “‘Active Nature’ and Other Striking Features of Abū Bishr Mattā ibn Yūnus’s Cosmology as Reconstructed from His Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics.” In Ideas in Motion in Baghdad and Beyond: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges between Christians and Muslims in the Third/Ninth and Fourth/Tenth Centuries, ed. Janos, D., 135–77. Leiden.Google Scholar

Janssens, J. 2004. “‘Experience’ (tajriba) in Classical Arabic Philosophy (al-Fārābī-Avicenna).” Quaestio 4: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, B. 1999. Contingency in a Sacred Law: Legal and Ethical Norms in Muslim Fiqh. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, B. 2002. “Signs as Evidence: The Doctrine of Ibn Taymiyya (1263–1328) and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (d.1351) on Proof.” Islamic Law and Society 9.2: 168–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, B. 2007. “The Changing Limits of Contingency in the History of Muslim Law.” Paper presented at the Nehemia Levtzion Center for Islamic Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Online.Google Scholar

Johansen, B. 2013. “Dissent and Uncertainty in the Process of Legal Norm Construction in Muslim Sunni Law.” In Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought, ed. Cook, M. and Haidar, N., 127–44. New York.Google Scholar

Juynboll, T. 2012. “Farḍ.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition [EI2], ed. Bearman, P. J., Bianquis, T., et al. Leiden.Google Scholar

Kamali, M. 2006. “Legal Maxims and Other Genres of Literature in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Arab Law Quarterly 20: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knuuttila, S. 2012. “Modality.” In The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Marenbon, J., 312–41. New York.Google Scholar

Kogan, B. S. 1985. Averroes and the Metaphysics of Causation. Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Korolec, J. B. 1992. “Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles.” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 31: 61–118.Google Scholar

Kruk, R. 1990. “A Frothy Bubble: Spontaneous Generation in the Medieval Islamic Tradition.” Journal of Semitic Studies 35: 265–82.Google Scholar

Lameer, J. 1994. Al-Fārābī and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, E. W. 1968. An Arabic-English Lexicon. In Eight Parts. Beirut. (Orig. pub. 1867.)Google Scholar

Langermann, T. Y. 2003. “Another Andalusian Revolt? Ibn Rushd’s Critique of al-Kindī’s Pharmacological Computus.” In The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives, ed. Hogendijk, J. P. and Sabra, A. I., 351–72. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Langhade, J., and Mallet, D. 1985. “Droit et philosophie au XIIe siècle dans al-Andalus: Averroes (Ibn Rušd).” Revue de l’Occident musulman et de la Méditerranée 40: 103–21.Google Scholar

Linant de Bellefonds, Y. 1974. “Ḳadhf.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition [EI2], vol. 4: 389‒90. Leiden.Google Scholar

Lizzini, O. 2012. Avicenna. Rome.Google Scholar

Lomba, J. 1997 . Introduction to Ibn Bāŷŷa (Avempace): El régimen del solitario (Tadbīr al-mutawaḥḥid), tr. Lomba, Joaquín. Madrid.Google Scholar

Lowe, M. F. 1983. “Aristotle on Kinds of Thinking.” Phronesis 28: 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowry, J. “Al-ʿĀmm wa-l-khāṣṣ.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 3rd edition [EI3], ed. Fleet, K., Krämer, G., et al. Leiden.Google Scholar

Mahdi, M. 1964. “Averroës on Divine Law and Human Wisdom.” In Ancients and Moderns: Essays on the Tradition of Political Philosophy in Honor of Leo Strauss, ed. Cropsey, J., 114–31. New York.Google Scholar

Makdisi, G. 1997. Ibn ʿAqil: Religion and Culture in Classical Islam. Edinburgh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malink, M. 2013. Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manekin, C. H. 1992. The Logic of Gersonides: A Translation of Sefer ha-Heqqesh ha-Yashar (The Book of the Correct Syllogism) of Rabbi Levi ben Gershom with Introduction, Commentary, and Analytical Glossary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansion, A. 1946. Introduction à la Physique aristotélicienne. Paris.Google Scholar

March, A. 2016. “Falsafa and Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law, ed. A. Emon and R. Ahmed. Online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marenbon, J. 2007. “Latin Averroism.” In Islamic Crosspollinations: Interactions in the Medieval Middle East, ed. Akasoy, A., Montgomery, J., and Pormann, P. E., 135–47. Exeter.Google Scholar

Marmura, M. E. 1980. “Avicenna’s Proof from Contingency for God’s Existence in the Metaphysics of the Shifāʾ.” Medieval Studies 42: 337–52.Google Scholar

Mayer, T. 2001. “Avicenna’s Burhān al-Ṣiddiqīn.” Journal of Islamic Studies 12: 18–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinnis, J. 2003. “Scientific Methodologies in Medieval Islam.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41.3: 307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinnis, J. 2010. Avicenna. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinnis, J., and Reisman, D., eds. 2007. Classical Arabic Philosophy: An Anthology of Sources. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

McVaugh, M. R. 1975. “The Development of Medieval Pharmaceutical Theory.” In Arnald of Villanova 1975: 1–136.Google Scholar

McVaugh, M. R. 2000. “Introduction.” In Arnald of Villanova 2000: 127–97.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2012. “Self-Motion and Reflection: Hermeias and Proclus on the Harmony of Plato and Aristotle on the Soul.” In Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature, ed. Wilberding, J. and Horn, C., 44–67. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mignucci, M. 1975. L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele: Commento agli Analitici secondi. Padova.Google Scholar

Morrison, D. . 1997. “Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof.” In Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, ed. Liscia, D. A., Kessler, E., and Methuen, C., 1–22. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Natali, C. 2003. “Aristote.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques: Supplément, 174–90. Paris.Google Scholar

Normore, C. 2015. “Metaphysics in the Orbit of Islam.” In Aristotle and the Arabic Tradition, ed. Alwishah, A. and Hayes, J., 177–99. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Novaes, C. D., and Read, S., eds. 2016. The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opwis, F. 2005. “Maṣlaḥa in Contemporary Islamic Legal Theory.” Islamic Law and Society 12.2: 182–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opwis, F. 2010. Maṣlaḥa and the Purpose of the Law: Islamic Discourse on Legal Change from the 4th/10th to 8th/14th Century. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1961. “Τιθέναι τὰ φαινόμενα (Tithenai ta phainomena).” In Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, ed. Mansion, S., 83–103. Paris-Louvain.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1970. “Aristotle: Method, Physics, and Cosmology.” In Dictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. Gillespie, C. C., 50–258. New York.Google Scholar

Pellat, C. 2012. “Ḥilm.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition [EI2], ed. Bearman, P. J., Bianquis, T., et al. Leiden.Google Scholar

Peters, R. 2012. “Shāhid.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition [EI2], ed. Bearman, P. J., Bianquis, T., et al. Leiden.Google Scholar

Pines, S. 1974. “The Arabic Recension of Parva naturalia and the Philosophical Doctrine Concerning Veridical Dreams.” Israel Oriental Studies 4: 104–53.Google Scholar

Polansky, R. 2007. Aristotle’s De Anima. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabb, I. 2015. Doubt in Islamic Law. New York.Google Scholar

Rashed, M. 2000. “Alexandre d’Aphrodise lecteur du Protreptique.” In Les prologues médiévaux, ed. Hamesse, J., 1–37. Turnhout.Google Scholar

Rashed, M. 2009. “On the Authorship of the Treatise On the Harmonization of the Opinions of the Two Sages Attributed to al-Fārābī.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 19: 43–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renan, E. 1861. Averroes et l’Averroisme. Paris. (Orig. pub. 1852.)Google Scholar

Rescher, N. 1963. “Averroes’ Quaesitum on Assertoric (Absolute) Propositions.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 1: 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudolph, U., ed. 2012. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie: Philosophie in der islamischen Welt, Band 1: 8.–10. Jahrhundert. Basel.Google Scholar

Savage-Smith, E. 1997. “Médecine.” In Histoire des sciences arabes, ed. Rashed, R., vol. 3: 155–212. Paris.Google Scholar

Schacht, J. 1964. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford.Google Scholar

Serrano, D. 2005. “Por qué llamaron los Almohades antropomorfistas a los Almorávides?” In Los Almohades: Problemas y perspectivas, ed. Cressier, P., Fierro, M., and Molina, L., vol. 2: 815–52. Madrid.Google Scholar

Shields, C. 2007. Aristotle. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shihadeh, A. 2014. “Theories of Ethical Value in Kalām: A New Interpretation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. Schmidtke, S., 384–407. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 2005. The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook, vol. 2: Physics. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Steel, C. 1987. “Proclus et Aristote sur la causalité de l’intellect divine.” In Proclus, lecteur et interprète des anciens, ed. Pepin, J. and Saffrey, H. D., 213–25. Paris.Google Scholar

Steinschneider, M. 1893. Die hebräischen Übersetzungen des Mittelalters und die Juden als Dolmetscher. Berlin.Google Scholar

Stone, A. D. 2008. “Avicenna’s Theory of Primary Mixture.” Arabic Science and Philosophy 18: 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, L. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago.Google Scholar

Strauss, L. 1965. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago.Google Scholar

Strauss, L. 1995. Philosophy and Law, tr. Adler, E.. New York.Google Scholar

Street, T. 2013. “Avicenna on the Syllogism.” In Adamson 2013b: 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Street, T. 2015. “Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Language and Logic.” In Online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2015 edition, ed. E. N. Zalta. Online.Google Scholar

Striker, G. 1996. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroumsa, S. 1993. “Al-Fārābī and Maimonides on Medicine as a Science.” Arabic Science and Philosophy 3: 235–49.Google Scholar

Tamani, G. 1994. “Le generalità della medicina di Averroè.” Medicina nei secoli 6.2: 407–23.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. C. 1999. “Remarks on Cogitatio in Averroes’ Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De Anima Libros.” In Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition, ed. Endress, G. and Aertsen, J. A., 217–55. Leiden.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. C. 2000a. “Cogitatio, Cogitativus and Cogitare: Remarks on the Cogitative Power in Averroes.” In L’Élaboration du vocabulaire philosophique au moyen âge, ed. Hamesse, J. and Steel, C., 111–46. Turnhout.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. C. 2000b. “‘Truth Does not Contradict Truth’: Averroes and the Unity of Truth.” Topoi 19: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, R. C. 2005. “Averroes: Religious Dialectic and Aristotelian Philosophical Thought.” In Adamson and Taylor 2005: 180–200.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. C. 2009. “Ibn Rushd/Averroes and ‘Islamic’ Rationalism.” In Medieval Encounters, ed. Curfis, I., vol. 15: 125–35. Leiden.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. C. 2012. “Averroes on the Sharīʿah of the Philosophers.” In The Muslim, Christian, and Jewish Heritage: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives in the Abrahamic Traditions, ed. Taylor, R. C. and Omar, I., 283–304. Milwaukee.Google Scholar

Thom, P. 2001. “An Avicennan Extension of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic.” In Islam-West Philosophical Dialogue: The Papers Presented at the World Congress on Mullā Ṣadrā, vol. 8: 17–42. Tehran.Google Scholar

Thom, P. 2003. Medieval Modal Systems. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Thom, P. 2016a. “The Syllogism and Its Transformations.” In Novaes and Read 2016: 290–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thom, P. 2016b. “Necessity in Avicenna and the Arabic Tradition.” In Logical Modalities from Aristotle to Carnap: The Story of Necessity, ed. Cresswell, M. et al. 91–112. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torre, E. 1974. Averroes y la ciencia médica. Madrid.Google Scholar

Touwaide, A. 1994, “Galien et la toxicologie.” In Aufsteig und Niedergang der Romischen Welt 37: 2, ed. Haase, W., 1887–986. Berlin.Google Scholar

Twetten, D. B. 1995. “Averroes on the Prime Mover Proved in the Physics.” Viator 26: 107–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Twetten, D. B. 2007. “Averroes’ Prime Mover Argument.” In Averroès et les Averroïsmes juif et latin, ed. Brenet, J.-B., 9–75. Turnhout.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Twetten, D. B. 2015. “Aristotelian Cosmology and Causality in Classical Arabic Philosophy and Its Greek Background.” In Ideas in Motion in Baghdad and Beyond: Philosophical and Theological Exchanges between Christians and Muslims in the Third/Ninth and Fourth/Tenth Centuries, ed. Janos, D., 312–433. Leiden.Google Scholar

Uckelman, S., and Lagerlund, H. 2016. “Logic in the Latin Thirteenth Century.” In Novaes and Read 2016: 142–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urvoy, D. 1978. “La pensée almohade dans l’oeuvre d’Averroès.” In Multiple Averroès, ed. Jolivet, J., 45–54. Paris.Google Scholar

Urvoy, D. 1992. “The ʿulamāʾ of al-Andalus.” In The Legacy of Muslim Spain, ed. Jayyusi, S. K.. Leiden.Google Scholar

Urvoy, D. 1998. Averroès: Les ambitions d’un intellectuel musulman. Paris.Google Scholar

Urvoy, D. 2005. “Ibn Rushd et le pouvoir almohade.” In Averroès et l’averroïsme (XIIe–XVe siècle): Un itinéraire historique du Haut Atlas à Paris et à Padoue, ed. Bazzana, A., Bériou, N., and Guichard, P., 121–30. Lyon.Google Scholar

Vázquez de Benito, M.C. 1999. “La triaca o antidoto universal: La triaca de Averroes.” In La medicina en al-Andalus, 255–64. Granada.Google Scholar

von Kügelgen, A. 1994. Averroes und die arabische Moderne: Ansätze zu einer Neubegründung des Rationalismus im Islam. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weill-Parot, N. 2013. Points aveugles de la nature: La rationalité scientifique médiévale face à l’occulte, l’attraction magnétique et l’horreur du vide (XIIIe-milieu du XVe siècle). Paris.Google Scholar

Weiss, B. 1985. “Knowledge of the Past: The Theory of Tawātur According to Ghazālī.” Studia Islamica 65: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wensinck, J., and Heinrichs, W. 2012. “Mutawātir.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition [EI2], ed. Bearman, P. J., Bianquis, T., et al. Leiden.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G. 1990. “The Alexandrian Commentators and the Introductions to Their Commentaries.” In Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, ed. Sorabji, R., 325–48. London.Google Scholar

Wieland, W. 1962. Die aristotelische Physik: Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristoteles. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Williams, J. A. 1971. Themes of Islamic Civilization. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Wirmer, D. 2004. “Der Begriff der Intention und seine erkenntnistheoretische Funktion in den De-anima-Kommentaren des Averroes.” In Erkenntnis und Wissenschaft: Probleme der Epistemologie in der Philosophie des Mittelalters, ed. Lutz-Bachmann, M., Fidora, A., and Antolic, P., 35–67. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wirmer, D. 2006. “Avempace – ‘ratio de quiditate’: Thomas Aquinas’s Critique of an Argument for the Natural Knowability of Separate Substances.” In Wissen über Grenzen: Arabisches Wissen und lateinisches Mittelalter, ed. Speer, A. and Wegener, L., 569–90. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wirmer, D. 2008. “Nachwort: Einführung in die Psychologie des Averroes.” In Averroes 2008b: 287–409.Google Scholar

Wirmer, D. 2013. “Metaphysik und Intellektlehre: philosophische Hauptthemen des Ibn Rušd (Averroes).” In Kleines Handbuch der islamischen Philosophie, ed. Eichner, H., Perkams, M., and Schäfer, C., 341–65. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Wirmer, D. 2014. Vom Denken der Natur zur Natur des Denkens: Ibn Bāǧǧas Theorie der Potenz als Grundlegung der Psychologie. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wirmer, D. Forthcoming. Proceedings of the Conference “From Cordoba to Cologne: Transformation and Translation, Transmission and Edition of Averroes’ Works (Cologne 2011),” ed. D. Wirmer.Google Scholar

Woerther, F. 2018. Le plaisir, le bonheur, et lʼacquisition des vertus: Édition et traduction annotée du Livre X du Commentaire moyen à lʼÉthique à Nicomaque dʼAverroès, précédée de deux études générales sur le Commentaire moyen à lʼÉthique à Nicomaque dʼAverroès. Leiden.Google Scholar

Wolfson, H. A. R. 1935. “The Internal Senses in Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew Philosophic Texts.” Harvard Theological Review 28: 69–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfson, H. A. R. 1976. The Philosophy of the Kalam. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Zonta, M. 2001. “La tradizione giudeo-araba ed ebraica del De intellectu di Alessandro di Afrodisia e il testo originale del Commento di Averroè.” Annali di Ca’ Foscari 40.3: 17–35.Google Scholar

Zonta, M. 2003. “Aristote: Les éthiques, tradition syriaque et arabe.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Supplément, ed. Goulet, R., 191–98. Paris.Google Scholar

Zouggar, N. 2012. “La prophétologie d’Averroès dans le Kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla.” Annales Islamologiques 46: 387–408.Google Scholar

Zysow, A. 1984. “The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory.” PhD diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar

Zysow, A. 2013. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory. Atlanta, GA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar