[GS] Gesammelte Schriften (1914–2006). Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner (previous publisher); Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht (current publisher).Google Scholar

GS 1: 1959. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften: Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, ed. Groethuysen, B.. 4th edn.Google Scholar

GS 2: 1957. Weltanschauung und Analyse des Menschen seit Renaissance und Reformation, ed. Misch, G.. 5th edn.Google Scholar

GS 3: 1959. Studien zur Geschichte des Deutschen Geistes: Leibniz und sein Zeitalter. Friedrich der Grosse und die Deutschen Aufklärung. Das achtzehnte Jahrhundert und die geschichtliche Welt, ed. Ritter, P.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

GS 4: 1959. Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels und andere Abhandlungen zur Geschichte des deutschen Idealismus, ed. Nohl, H.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

GS 5: 1957. Die Geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Erste Hälfte: Abhandlungen zur Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften, ed. Misch, G.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

GS 6: 1958. Die Geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens. Zweite Hälfte: Abhandlungen zur Poetik, Ethik und Pädagogik, ed. Misch, G.. 3rd edn.Google Scholar

GS 7: 1956. Der Aufbau der Geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften, ed. Groethuysen, B.. 2nd edn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

GS 8: 1960. Weltanschauungslehre: Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Philosophie, ed. Groethuysen, B.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

GS 9: 1960. Pädagogik: Geschichte und Grundlinien des Systems, ed. Bollnow, O.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

GS 10: 1958. System der Ethik, ed. Nohl, H..Google Scholar

GS 11: 1960. Vom Aufgang des geschichtlichen Bewußtseins: Jugendaufsätze und Erinnerungen, ed. Weniger, E.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

GS 12: 1960. Zur Preussischen Geschichte: Schleiermachers politische Gesinnung und Wirksamkeit. Die Reorganisatoran des preussischen Staates. Das allgemeine Landrecht, ed. Weniger, E.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

GS 13: 1970. Leben Schleiermachers: Auf Grund des Textes der 1. Auflage von 1870 und der Zusätze aus dem Nachlaß, ed. Redeker, M..Google Scholar

GS 14: 1966. Leben Schleiermachers. Zweiter Band: Schleiermachers System als Philosophie und Theologie, ed. Redeker, M..Google Scholar

GS 15: 1970. Zur Geistesgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts: Portraits und biographische Skizzen. Quellenstudien und Literatur-Berichte zur Theologie und Philosophie, ed. Herrmann, U..Google Scholar

GS 16: 1972. Zur Geistesgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts: Aufsätze und Rezensionen aus Zeitungen und Zeitschriften 1859–1874, ed. Herrmann, U..Google Scholar

GS 17: 1974. Zur Geistesgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts: Aus “Westermanns Monatsheften”: Literaturbriefe, Berichte zur Kunstgeschichte, Verstreute Rezensionen 1867–1884, ed. Herrmann, U..Google Scholar

GS 18: 1977. Die Wissenschaften vom Menschen, der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte: Vorarbeiten zur Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften (1865–1880), ed. Johach, H. and Rodi, F..Google Scholar

GS 19: 1997. Grundlegung der Wissenschaften vom Menschen, der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, ed. Johach, H. and Rodi, F.. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

GS 20: 1990. Logik und System der Philosophischen Wissenschaften: Vorlesungen zur erkenntnistheoretischen Logik und Methodologie, ed. Lessing, H. and Rodi, F..Google Scholar

GS 21: 1997. Psychologie als Erfahrungswissenschaft. Erster Teil: Vorlesungen zur Psychologie und Anthropologie (1875–1894), ed. Kerckhoven, G. and Lessing, H.-U..Google Scholar

GS 22: 2005. Psychologie als Erfahrungswissenschaft. Zweiter Teil: Manuskripte zur Genese der deskriptiven Psychologie (ca. 1880–1896), ed. Lessing, H.-U. and van Kerckhoven, G..Google Scholar

GS 23: 2000. Allgemeine Geschichte der Philosophie. Vorlesungen 1900–1905, ed. Gebhardt, G. and Lessing, H.-U..Google Scholar

GS 24: 2004. Logik und Wert. Späte Vorlesungen, Entwürfe und Fragmente zur Strukturpsychologie, Logik und Wertlehre (ca. 1904–1911), ed. Kühne-Bertram, G..Google Scholar

GS 25: 2006. Dichter als Seher der Menschheit. Die geplante Sammlung literarhistorischer Aufsätze von 1895, ed. Malsch, G..Google Scholar

GS 26: 2005. Das Erlebnis und die Dichtung. Lessing – Goethe – Novalis – Hölderlin, ed. Malsch, G..Google Scholar

[B] Briefwechsel (2011–ongoing). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar

B I: 2011. Wilhelm Dilthey: Briefwechsel. Band I: 1852–1882, ed. Kühne-Bertram, G. and Lessing, H.-U..Google Scholar

B II: 2014. Wilhelm Dilthey: Briefwechsel. Band II: 1882–1896, ed. Kühne-Bertram, G. and Lessing, H.-U..Google Scholar

1865. Grundriss der Logik und des Systems der philosophischen Wissenschaften. Berlin: Mittler. Republished in GS 20: 19–32.Google Scholar

1875. “Über das Studium der Geschichte der Wissenschaften vom Menschen, der Gesellschaft und den Staat.” Philosophische Monatsheften XI: 118–132. Republished in GS 5: 31–89.Google Scholar

1898. “Die drei Grundformen der Systeme in der ersten Hӓlfte des 19. Jahrhunderts.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie XI: 551–586. Republished in GS 4: 528–554.Google Scholar

1923. Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm Dilthey und dem Grafen Paul Yorck von Wartenburg, 1877–97, ed. Sigrid von der Schulenburg. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

1954. Die Große Phantasiedichtung und andere Studien zur vergleichenden Literaturgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar

1957a. Von Deutscher Dichtung und Musik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. 2nd edn.Google Scholar

1957b. Das Erlebnis und die Dichtung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. Republished in GS 26.Google Scholar

1960. Der junge Dilthey: Ein Lebensbild in Briefen und Tagebüchern, 1852–187, ed. Misch, Clara. 2nd edn. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar

1968. “Der Briefwechsel Dilthey und Husserl,” ed. Biemel, Walter. Man and World 3, 1: 428–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[SW] Selected Works, ed. Makkreel, Rudolf and Rodi, Frithjof. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

SW I: 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences.Google Scholar

SW II: 2010. Understanding the Human World.Google Scholar

SW III: 2002. The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences.Google Scholar

SW IV: 1996. Hermeneutics and the Study of History.Google Scholar

SW V: 1985. Poetry and Experience.Google Scholar

SW VI: in press. Ethical and World-View Philosophy.Google Scholar

1961. Pattern and Meaning in History: Thoughts on History and Society, ed. Rickman, Hans Peter. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar

1976. Dilthey: Selected Writings, trans. Rickman, Hans Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

1977. Descriptive Psychology and Historical Understanding, trans. Zaner, R. M. and Heiges, K. I.. Intro. Makkreel, R.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W. 2017. Aesthetics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Amaral, Nazaré de Camargo Pacheco. 1996. “Sozialethik bei Dilthey und Schleiermacher.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 10: 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto. 1984. Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto. 1998. Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Arthos, J. 2000. “To Be Alive When Something Happens: Retrieving Dilthey’s Erlebnis.” Janus Head 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, J. I. (Hans). 1999. “Wilhelm Dilthey: Classical Sociological Theorist.” Quarterly Journal of Ideology 22, 1: 43–82.Google Scholar

Bambach, Charles. 1995. Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, Frederick. 2011. The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bermes, Christian. 2004. “Welt” als Thema der Philosophie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berner, Christian. 2014. “Wir verstehen nur Zusammenhang. A propos de la théorie des conceptions du monde chez Dilthey.” Lo Sguardo. Rivista di Filosofia 14: 35–45.Google Scholar

Bernhardi, Friedrich von. 1912. Germany and the Next War, trans. Powles, A.. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Bloom, Paul. 2014. “Against Empathy.” The Boston Review, September 10.Google Scholar

Bollnow, Otto. 1967. Dilthey: Eine Einführung in seine Philosophie. 3rd edn. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.Google Scholar

Bouwsma, O. K. 1986. Wittgenstein: Conversations 1949–1951, ed. Craft, J. L. and Hustwit, Ronald E.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. J. 1976. “Malthus, Darwin, and the Concept of Struggle.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37, 4: 631–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Braver, Lee. 2012. Groundless Grounds: A Study of Wittgenstein and Heidegger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braver, Lee. 2014. “Hermeneutics and Language Philosophy,” in Routledge Companion to Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. Gander, Hans-Helmuth and Malpas, Jeff. New York: Routledge, 634–643.Google Scholar

Bruch, Rüdiger Vom, Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm, and Hübinger, Gangolf. 1989. Kultur und Kulturwissenschaften um 1900: Krise der Moderne und Glaube an die Wissenschaft. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Bruhn, Nils. 2007. Vom Kulturkritiker zum “Kulturkrieger.” Paul Natorps Weg in den “Krieg der Geister.” Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin. 1997. Israel and the World: Essays in a Time of Crisis. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin. 2001. Frühe kulturkritische und philosophische Schriften 1891–1924, ed. Mendes-Flohr, Paul and Treml, Martin. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlag-Haus.Google Scholar

Bulhof, Ilse Nina. 1980. Wilhelm Dilthey: A Hermeneutic Approach to the Study of History and Culture. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, Edmund. 2015. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Guyer, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. 1976. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chenari, Mahin. 2009. “Hermeneutics and Theory of Mind.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8, 1: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chladenius, Johann Martin. 1752. Allgemeine Geschichtswissenschaft. Leipzig: Friedrich Lanckischen.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1938. The Principles of Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1994. The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corngold, Stanley. 1981. “Dilthey’s Essay The Poetic Imagination: A Poetics of Force.” Interpretation 9, 2–3: 301–337.Google Scholar

Corngold, Stanley. 1994. The Fate of the Self: German Writers and French Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Crowe, Benjamin. 2005. “Dilthey’s Philosophy of Religion in the ‘Critique of Historical Reason’: 1880–1910.” Journal of the History of Ideas 66: 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damböck, Christian. 2012. “Wilhelm Dilthey’s Empirische Philosophie und der rezente Methodenstreit in der analytischen Philosophie.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 85, 1: 151–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damböck, Christian. 2017. Deutscher Empirismus: Studien zur Philosophie im deutschsprachigen Raum 1830–1930. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Anna, Giuseppe, Johach, Helmut, and Nelson, Eric S., eds. 2013. Anthropologie und Geschichte: Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100 Todestages. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1873. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar

de Mul, Jos. 1997. “Structuralist and Hermeneutic Approaches to Development,” in Philosophy of Development: Reconstructing the Foundations of Human Development and Education, ed. van Haaften, A. W., Korthals, M., and Wren, T.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Mul, Jos. 2004. The Tragedy of Finitude: Dilthey’s Hermeneutics of Life, trans. Burrett, Tony. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

de Mul, Jos. 2010. Cyberspace Odyssey: Towards a Virtual Ontology and Anthropology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

de Mul, Jos. 2013. “Understanding Nature: Dilthey, Plessner and Biohermeneutics,” in Anthropologie und Geschichte: Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100. Todestages̈, ed. D’Anna, Johach, and Nelson, 459–478.Google Scholar

de Vignemont, F. and Singer, T.. 2006. “The Empathic Brain: How, When and Why?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 435–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dilthey, Katharina. 1922. “Eine Erinnerung an Henrik Ibsen.” Westermanns illustrierte deutsche Monatshefte (December): 362–364.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johann Gustav. 1977. Historik: Die Vorlesungen von 1857, ed. Leyh, Peter. Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Dvash, J. and Shamay-Tsoory, S. G.. 2014. “Theory of Mind and Empathy as Multidimensional Constructs: Neurological Foundations.” Topics in Language Disorders 34, 4: 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ermarth, Michael. 1978. Wilhelm Dilthey: The Critique of Historical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fechner, G. T. 1907. Über die Seelenfrage. Hamburg und Leipzig: L. Voss.Google Scholar

Fischer-Tiné, Harald. 2015. “The Other Side of Internationalism: Switzerland as a Hub of Militant Anti-Colonialism 1910–1920,” in Colonial Switzerland: Rethinking Colonialism from the Margins, ed. Purtschert, P. and Fischer-Tiné, H.. London: Palgrave, 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flasch, Kurt. 1991. “Abschied von Dilthey. Historisches Wissen ohne Verstehen,” in Filosofía e cultura: Per Eugenio Garin, vol. II, ed. Ciliberto, M. and Vasoli, C.. Rome: Riuniti, 625–645.Google Scholar

Flasch, Kurt. 2000. Die geistige Mobilmachung. Die deutschen Intellektuellen und der Erste Weltkrieg. Berlin: Alexander Fest Verlag.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2010. After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2011a. “Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Critical Appraisal.” Mythos-Magazin, July 2011. www.mythos-magazin.de/erklaerendehermeneutik/mf_gadamer.htm.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2011b. German Philosophy of Language: From Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2012. “Dilthey’s Significance for Hermeneutics.” Mythos-Magazin, May 2012. www.mythos-magazin.de/erklaerendehermeneutik/mf_dilthey.pdf.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2013. “Hypothesis in Natural Science and Interpretation,” in Naturalistische Hermeneutik: Ein neues Paradigma des Verstehens und Interpretierens, ed. Madonna, L. C.. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended, trans. Macey, D.. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Frischeisen-Köhler, Max. 1911. Weltanschauung: Philosophie und Religion in Darstellung. Berlin: Verlag Reichl and Co.Google Scholar

Frischeisen-Köhler, Max. 1915. Das Problem des ewigen Friedens: Betrachtungen über das Wesen und die Bedeutung des Krieges. Berlin: Mittler und Sohn.Google Scholar

Frischeisen-Köhler, Max. 1917. “Philosophie und Pädagogik.” Kant-Studien 22, 1–2: 27–80.Google Scholar

Frischeisen-Köhler, Max. 1921. Bildung und Weltanschauung: eine Einführung in die pädagogischen Theorien. Charlottenburg: Mundus-Verl.-Anst.Google Scholar

Fulsås, Narve and Kühne-Bertram, Gudrun. 2009. “Ibsen and Dilthey: Evidence of a Forgotten Acquaintance.” Ibsen Studies 9, 1: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. “The Problem of Historical Consciousness.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 5, 1: 8–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1985–1995. Gesammelte Werke, 10 Bänden. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1986a. Gesammelte Werke, vol. I (Wahrheit und Methode). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1986b. “Das Problem der Geschichte in der neueren deutschen Philosophie” (1943), in Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, vol. II (Wahrheit und Methode: Ergänzungen). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 27–36.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1987. “Das Problem Diltheys: Zwischen Romantik und Positivismus,” in Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, vol. IV (Neuere Philosophie II). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 406–424.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1993. “Die Aktualität des Schönen” [1974], in Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Gesammelte Werke, vol. VIII (Ästhetik und Poetik: Kunst als Aussage). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 94–142.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1995. Gesammelte Werke, vol. X (Hermeneutik in Rückblick). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2001. Das Problem des historischen Bewusstseins. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method, trans. Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2007. Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings, ed. Palmer, Richard. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun. 2012. “Neurons, Neonates and Narrative: From Embodied Resonance to Empathic Understanding,” in Moving Ourselves, Moving Others, ed. Foolen, A., Lüdtke, U., Zlatev, J., and Racine, T.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–196.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun. 2013a. “Empathy, Simulation and Narrative.” Science in Context 25, 3: 301–327.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun. 2013b. “The Socially Extended Mind.” Cognitive Systems Research 25–26: 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, Shaun and Hutto, Daniel. 2008. “Understanding Others through Primary Interaction and Narrative Practice,” in The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, ed. Zlatev, J., Racine, T., Sinha, C., and Itkonen, E.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallese, Vittorio. 2001. “The ‘Shared Manifold’ Hypothesis: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 33–50.Google Scholar

Garber, Marjorie. 2001. Academic Instincts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Geiger, M. 2010/2011. “Über das Wesen und die Bedeutung der Einfühlung,” in Kongress für experimentelle Psychologie, ed. Schumann, F.. Leipzig: Verlag J. A. Barth, 29–73.Google Scholar

Geiger, M. 2015. “On the Essence and Meaning of Empathy Parts I and II.” trans. Gödel, F. and Aragonaas, M.. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neurosciences 8, 1: 19–31.Google Scholar

Gier, Nicholas F. 1981. Wittgenstein and Phenomenology: A Comparative Study of the Later Wittgenstein, Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, Kristin. 2013. “Enlightenment, History, and the Anthropological Turn: The Hermeneutical Challenge of Dilthey’s Schleiermacher Studies,” in D’Anna, Johach, and Nelson, eds., 323–355.Google Scholar

Glatz, Uwe B. 2001. Emil Lask: Philosophie im Verhältnis zu Weltanschauung, Leben und Erkenntnis. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang Von. 1961. Faust, trans. Kaufmann, Walter. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin. 2006. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, Alvin. 2011. “Two Routes to Empathy,” in Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, ed. Coplan, A. and Goldie., P. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grondin, Jean. 2009. Hermeneutik. Göttingen: UTB-Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Grondin, Jean. 2011. L’herméneutique, 3rd edn. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Grondin, Jean. 2014. “Do Gadamer and Ricoeur Have the Same Understanding of Hermeneutics?” in The Agon of Interpretations: Towards a Critical Intercultural Hermeneutics, ed. Xie, M.. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grondin, Jean. 2016. Paul Ricoeur, 2nd edn. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1968. Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. Shapiro, Jeremy J.. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Harrington, A. 2001. “Dilthey, Empathy and Verstehen: A Contemporary Reappraisal.” European Journal of Social Theory 4, 3: 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heal, Jane. 1995. “How to Think about Thinking,” in Mental Simulation: Evaluations and Applications, ed. Davies, M. and Stone, T.. Oxford: Blackwell, 33–52.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1970. Werke in 20 Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1975. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, vol. I and vol. II, trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2014. Lectures on the Philosophy of Art: The Hotho Transcript of the 1823 Berlin Lectures, ed. and trans. Brown, Robert F.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. London: SCM Press/New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1974–ongoing. Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1985. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena, trans. Kisiel, Theodore. J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1992/1993. “Wilhelm Dilthey’s Forschungsarbeit und der gegenwärtige Kampf um eine historische Weltanschauung: 10 Vorträge, gehalten in Kassel April 16–21, 1925.” Ed. Rodi, F.. Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 8: 143–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1993. Phänomenologie der Anschauung und des Ausdrucks: Theorie der philosophischen Begriffsbildung. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1999. Ontology: Hermeneutics of Facticity, trans. van Buren, John. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2001. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research, trans. Rojcewicz, Richard. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2002. Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond, ed. van Buren, John. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2004. Der Begriff der Zeit (1924), Gesamtausgabe, vol. 64, ed. Friedrich‐Wilhelm von Herrmann. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2006. Sein und Zeit. 19th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2010. Phenomenology of Intuition and Expression: Theory of Philosophical Concept Formation, trans. Colony, Tracy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2011. The Concept of Time: The First Draft of “Being and Time,” trans. Farin, Ingo. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1833. The Spirit of Hebrew Poetry, vols. I–II, trans. Marsh, James. Burlington, VA: Edward Smith.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1877. Sämmtliche Werke, vol. I, ed. Suphan, Bernhard Ludwig et al. Berlin: Weidmannsche Verlag.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1985–1998. Werke in zehn Bänden, vol. II, ed. Bollacher, Martin et al. Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2006. Selected Writings on Aesthetics, ed. and trans. Moore, Gregory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2008. Shakespeare, ed. and trans. Moore, Gregory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Herfurth, Thomas. 1991. Diltheys Schriften zur Ethik: Der Aufbau der moralischen Welt als Resultat einer Kritik der introspektiven Vernunft. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar

Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von. 2000. Hermeneutik und Reflexion. Der Begriff der Phänomenologie bei Heidegger und Husserl. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Hinrichs, Carl. 1954. Ranke und die Geschichtstheologie der Goethezeit. Göttingen: Musterschmidt.Google Scholar

Hodges, Herbert A. 1974. The Philosophy of Wilhelm Dilthey. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Hoeres, Peter. 2009. Krieg der Philosophen: Die deutsche und die britische Philosophie im Ersten Weltkrieg. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max. 1939. “The Relation between Psychology and Sociology in the Work of Wilhelm Dilthey.” Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 8, 3: 430–443.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1904. “Über die Aufgabe des Geschichtsschreibers” (1821), in Gesammelte Schriften, vol. IV. Berlin: Behr’s Verlag.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, Husserliana 4. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität I, Husserliana 13. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1977. Phenomenological Psychology: Summer Semester 1925, trans. Scanlon, John. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hvattum, Mari. 2004. Gottfried Semper and the Problem of Historicism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, William. 1981. The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jean Paul, . 1963. Werke, vol. V5, ed. Miller, Norbert. München: Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar

Joël, Karl. 1915. Neue Weltkultur. Leipzig: Kurt Wolff Verlag.Google Scholar

Juarrero-Roque, Alicia. 1985. “Self Organization: Kant’s Conception of Teleology and Modern Chemistry.” Review of Metaphysics 39, 1: 107–135.Google Scholar

Jung, Matthias. 2003/2004. “‘Das Leben artikuliert sich’: Diltheys performativer Begriff der Bedeutung Artikulation als Fokus hermeneutischen Denkens.” Revue international de philosophie 226, 3: 439–454.Google Scholar

Jung, Matthias. 2009. Der Bewusste Ausdruck: Anthropologie der Artikulation. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jung, Matthias. 2014. Wilhelm Dilthey zur Einführung, 2nd edn. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1902–1997. Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften, ed. The Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences, 29 volumes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Often cited as AA (Akademie Ausgabe).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgment, trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. and trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 2011. “Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime (1764).” trans. Guyer, Paul. In Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings, ed. Frierson, Patrick and Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kerckhoven, Guy Van and Strube, Claudius. 1999/2000. “Lesespuren: Husserls und Heideggers Randbemerkungen zu Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie Georg Mischs Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 12 (1999/2000): 144–214.Google Scholar

Kimmerle, Heinz. 1957. “Die Hermeneutik Schleiermachers im Zusammenhang seines spekulativen Denkens.” Dissertation, Universität Heidelberg, Philosophische Fakultät.Google Scholar

Klemperer, Victor. 2013. The Language of the Third Reich, trans. Brady, M.. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Krell, David F. 1992. Daimon Life: Heidegger and Life-Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Kross, Matthias. 1995. “‘Kritik der ethischen Vernunft.’ Zu Wilhelm Diltheys Vorlesung ‘System der Ethik’ aus dem Jahre 1890.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 9: 235–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. 1987. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

La Vergata, Antonello. 1990. L’equilibrio e la guerra della natura. Dalla Teologia Naturale al Darwinismo. Naples: Morano.Google Scholar

Lange, Helene. 2000. Helene Lange und Gertrud Bäumer: Eine politische Lebensgemeinschaft. Köln: Böhlau Köln.Google Scholar

Lederer, Emil. 1979. Kapitalismus, Klassenstruktur und Probleme der Demokratie in Deutschland 1919–1940. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonhard, Jörn. 2008. Bellizismus und Nation: Kriegsdeutung und Nationsbestimmung in Europa und den Vereinigten Staaten 1750–1914. Munich: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold E. 1962. Hamburg Dramaturgy, trans. Zimmern, Helen. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold E. 1984. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry, trans. McCormick, Edward Allen. Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold E. 1985. Werke und Briefe in Zwölf Bänden, ed. Barner, Wilfried et al. Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar

Lessing, Hans-Ulrich. 1984. Die Idee einer Kritik der Historischen Vernunft: Wilhelm Diltheys Erkenntnistheoretisch-Logisch-Methodologische Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften. Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar

Lessing, Hans-Ulrich. 2003. “Historische Aufklärung und Geschichtlichkeit: Zur Rezeption von Diltheys Begriffswelt in Gadamers philosophischer Hermeneutik.” Archiv für Begreiffsgeschichte 45: 21–43.Google Scholar

Lessing, Hans-Ulrich. 2011. Wilhelm Dilthey: Eine Einführung. Köln: UTB-Böhlau Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessnoff, Michael. 1994. “Dilthey,” in Routledge History of Philosophy: The Nineteenth Century, ed. Ten, C. L.. London: Routledge, 206–242.Google Scholar

Lipps, Theodor. 1905. Die ethischen Grundfragen. Hamburg: Leopold Voss Verlag.Google Scholar

Lipps, Theodor. 1906. Ästhetik. Leipzig: Verlag.Google Scholar

Lipps, Theodor. 1907. “Das Wissen von fremden Ichen,” in Lipps, Theodor, Psychologische Untersuchungen I. Leipzig: Engelmann, 694–722.Google Scholar

Lipps, Theodor. 1909. Leitfaden der Psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Lotze, Rudolf H. 1858. Mikrokosmus, vol. II. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl. 1981. Mensch und Menschenwelt: Beitrage zur Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg. 1965. Die Theorie des Romans. Ein geschichtsphilosophischer Versuch über die Formen der großen Epik. Munich: Luchterhand Verlag.Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg. 1978. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature, trans. Bostock, Anna. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar

Madzia, Roman and Jung, Matthias. 2015. “Wilhelm Dilthey’s Philosophie der Verkörperung.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 63, 6: 1001–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1969. “Wilhelm Dilthey and the Neo-Kantians: The Distinction of the Geisteswissenschaften and the Kulturwissenschaften.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7, 4: 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1990a. “The Genesis of Heidegger’s Phenomenological Hermeneutics and the Rediscovered ‘Aristotle Introduction’ of 1922.” Man and World 23, 3: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1990b. “Traditional Historicism, Contemporary Interpretations of Historicity, and the History of Philosophy.” New Literary History 21, 4: 977–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1992. Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1994. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 1996. “How Is Empathy Related to Understanding?” In Issues in Husserl’s Ideas II, ed. Nenon, Thomas and Embree, Lester, 199–212. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2000. “From Simulation to Structural Transposition: A Diltheyan Critique of Empathy and Defense of Verstehen,” in Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences, ed. Kügler, Hans Herbert and Stueber, Karsten R., 181–193. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2003. “The Cognition-Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34, 1: 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2013. “The Anthropological Import of Dilthey’s System of Ethics,” in Anthropologie und Geschichte: Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100. Todestages̈, ed. D’Anna, Johach, and Nelson, 127–139.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2015. Orientation and Judgment in Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Scanlon, John, eds. 1987. Dilthey and Phenomenology. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. 1932. Hegels Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. 1987. Hegel’s Ontology and the Theory of Historicity, trans. Benhabib, Seyla. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marquard, Odo. 1973. Schwierigkeiten mit der Geschichtsphilosophie: Aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Masson, Scott. 2004. Romanticism, Hermeneutics, and the Crisis of the Human Sciences. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Mauthner, Fritz. 1923. Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. III. Leipzig: Meiner.Google Scholar

McGuinness, Brian. 2005. Young Ludwig: Wittgenstein’s Life 1889–1921. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medina, José. 2002. The Unity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy: Necessity, Intelligibility, and Normativity. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meinong, Alexius. 1968. Abhandlungen zur Werttheorie (Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe, vol. III), ed. Haller, Rudolf et al. Graz: Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar

Menary, Richard A. 2010. “Introduction to the Special Issue on 4E Cognition.” Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 9, 4: 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Hermann Julius, ed. 1897. Meyers Konversations-Lexikon, vol. XVII. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar

Misch, Georg. 1914. Vom Geist des Krieges und des deutschen Volkes barbarei; Rede gehalten in der aula der Universität Marburg. Jena: E. Diederichs.Google Scholar

Müller-Vollmer, Kurt. 1963. Towards a Phenomenological Theory of Literature: A Study of Wilhelm Dilthey’s “Poetik.”’ The Hague: Mounton and Co.Google Scholar

Murphey, Murray G. 2012. The Development of Quine’s Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1974. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review 83, 4: 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Natorp, Paul. 1912. Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritische Methode, vol. I: Objekt und Methode der Psychologie. Tübingen: Siebeck.Google Scholar

Natorp, Paul. 1918. “Bruno Bauchs Immanuel Kant und die Fortbildung des Systems des Kritischen Idealismus.” Kant-Studien 22, 1–2: 426–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naugle, David K. 2002. Worldview: The History of a Concept. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2007. “Empiricism, Facticity, and the Immanence of Life in Dilthey.” Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy 18: 108–128.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2008. “Interpreting Practice: Dilthey, Epistemology, and the Hermeneutics of Historical Life.” Idealistic Studies 38, 1–2: 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2010. “Impure Phenomenology: Dilthey, Epistemology, and Interpretive Psychology.” Studia Phenomenologica 10: 1–26.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2011a. “Self-Reflection, Interpretation, and Historical Life in Dilthey,” in Recent Contributions to Dilthey’s Philosophy of the Human Sciences, ed. Lessing, Hans-Ulrich, Makkreel, Rudolf A., and Pozzo, Riccardo. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2011b. “The World Picture and Its Conflict in Dilthey and Heidegger.” Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 18, 1: 19–38.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2013a. “Between Nature and Spirit: Naturalism and Anti-Naturalism in Dilthey,” in Anthropologie und Geschichte: Studien zu Wilhelm Dilthey aus Anlass seines 100. Todestages̈, ed. D’Anna, Johach, and Nelson, 141–160.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2013b. “Dilthey, Heidegger und die Hermeneutik des faktischen Lebens,” in Diltheys Werk und seine Wirkung, ed. Scholtz, Gunter. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 97–109.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2014. “Language, Psychology, and the Feeling of Life in Kant and Dilthey,” in The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought: Historical and Critical Essays, ed. Schalow, Frank and Velkley, Richard. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2015a. “Heidegger and Dilthey: Language, History and Hermeneutics,” in Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology, ed. Pedersen, Hans and Altman, Megan. Dordrecht: Springer, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2015b. “Life and World,” in Routledge Companion to Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. Malpas, Jeff and Gander, Hans-Helmuth. London: Routledge, 378–389.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2016a. “Heidegger and Dilthey: A Difference in Interpretation,” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, ed. Raffoul, Francois and Nelson, Eric S.. London: Bloomsbury Press, 129–134.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2016b. “Heidegger’s Black Notebooks: National Socialism, Antisemitism, and the History of Being,” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger, ed. Raffoul, Francois and Nelson, Eric S.. London: Bloomsbury Press, 484–493.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2017. Chinese and Buddhist Philosophy in Early Twentieth-Century German Thought. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2018a. “Dilthey and Carnap: The Feeling of Life, the Scientific Worldview, and Eliminating Metaphysics,” in The Worlds of Positivism: A Global Intellectual History, 1770–1930, ed. Feichtinger, Johannes, Fillafer, Franz L., and Surman, Jan. New York: Palgrave, 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. 2018b. “Wilhelm Dilthey and the Formative-Generative Imagination,” in Stretching the Limits of Productive Imagination, ed. Geniusas, Saulius. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 23–46.Google Scholar

Nenon, Tom. 1995. “Hermeneutical Truth and the Structure of Human Experience: Gadamer’s Critique of Dilthey,” in The Specter of Relativism: Truth, Dialogue, and “Phronesis” in Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. Schmidt, Lawrence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 39–55.Google Scholar

Neurath, Marie, ed. 1973. Empiricism and Sociology: The Life and Work of Otto Neurath. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1874. Unzeitgemӓsses Betrachtungen. Zweites Stück: Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie fϋr das Leben. Leipzig: Fritzsch.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1980. Sӓmtliche Werke, Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. Colli, Giorgo and Montinari, Mazzino. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2007. On the Genealogy of Morality, ed. Answell-Pearson, Keith and trans. Diethe, Carol, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Norris, Christopher. 2000. Minding the Gap: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science in the Two Traditions. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset, José. 1946. Concord and Liberty, trans. Weyl, Helene. New York: Norton Books.Google Scholar

Owensby, Jacob. 1994. Dilthey and the Narrative of History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pick, Daniel. 1993. War Machine: The Rationalisation of Slaughter in the Modern Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Plessner, Helmuth. 1976. Die Frage nach der Conditio Humana. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Michael. 1967. The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Prinz, Jesse. 2011. “Against Empathy.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49, Sup. 1: 214–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1992. Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W.V. 1976. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Revised edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ranke, Leopold von. 1824. Zur Kritik neuerer Geschichtsschreiber: Eine Beylage zu desselben romanischen und germanischen Geschichten. Leipzig: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ranke, Leopold von. [1824] 1874. Geschichte der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1514, in Sӓmtliche Werke, vol. XXXIII/XXXIV, ed. Dove, Alfred. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Ranke, Leopold von. 1975. Aus Werk und Nachlaβ, ed. Dotterweich, Volker and Fuchs, Walther Peter. Munich: Oldenbourgh.Google Scholar

Reid, James. 2001. “Dilthey’s Epistemology of the Geisteswissenschaften: Between Lebensphilosophie and Wissenschaftstheorie.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39, 3: 407–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rickert, Heinrich. 1920. Die Philosophie des Lebens: Darstellung und Kritik der philosophischen Modeströmungen unserer Zeit. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar

Rickman, Hans Peter. 1979. Wilhelm Dilthey: Pioneer of the Human Studies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. 1969. Le conflit des interpretations. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. 1973. The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, ed. Ihde., Don Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Rodi, Frithjof. 1986/1987. “Die Bedeutung Diltheys für die Konzeption von Sein und Zeit.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 4: 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodi, Frithjof. 1990. Erkenntnis des Erkannten. Zur Hermeneutik des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Rodi, Frithjof. 2003. “Drei Bemerkungen zu Diltheys Aufsatz ‘Die Entstehung der Hermeneutik’.” Revue international de philosophie 57, 226 (4): 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodi, Frithjof. 2015. Über die Erfahrung von Bedeutsamkeit. Freiburg: Karl Alber Verlag.Google Scholar

Rohbeck, Johannes. 2004. Geschichtsphilosophie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alex. 2001. “How Is Biological Explanation Possible?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52, 4: 735–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Rouse, Joseph. 1991. “Interpretation in Natural and Human Science,” in The Interpretive Turn, ed. Hiley, David R. et al. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 42–56.Google Scholar

Rouse, Joseph, ed. 1996. Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, Joseph. 2002. “Quinean Indeterminacy and Its Implications for Naturalism,” in How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 106–134.Google Scholar

Rouse, Joseph. 2015. Articulating the World: Conceptual Understanding and the Scientific Image. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1937. “Preface to the Second Edition,” in Russell, Bertrand, A Critical Exposition to the Philosophy of Leibniz. London: Georg Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Rutter, Benjamin. 2010. Hegel on the Modern Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santayana, George. 1896/1955. The Sense of Beauty: Being an Outline of Aesthetic Theory. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons/Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Schaser, Angelika. 2000. Helene Lange und Gertrud Bäumer: Eine Politische Lebensgemeinschaft. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Scharff, Robert. 2011. “Displacing Epistemology: Being in the Midst of Technoscientific Practice.” Foundations of Science 16, 2: 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharff, Robert. 2013. “Becoming a Philosopher: What Heidegger Learned from Dilthey, 1919–25.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21, 1: 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharff, Robert. 2014. How History Matters to Philosophy: Reconsidering Philosophy’s Past after Positivism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharff, Robert. 2018. Heidegger Becoming Phenomenological: Interpreting Husserl through Dilthey, 1916–1925. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Schilbach, Leonhard, Timmermans, Bert, Reddy, Vasudevi, Costall, Alan, Bente, Gary, Schlicht, Tobias, and Vogeley, Kai. 2013. “Toward a Second-Person Neuroscience.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 4: 393–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. 1967. Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, vol. II, ed. Behler, Ernst. München: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. 2003. “Letter about the Novel (1799),” in Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics, ed. Bernstein, J[ay]. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. 1982. “On the Different Methods of Translation,” in German Romantic Criticism, ed. Willson, A. Leslie. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. 1986. Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts, ed. Kimmerle, H. and trans. Duke, J. and Forstmann, J.. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. 1998. Hermeneutics and Criticism, ed. Bowie, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Schnädelbach, Herbert. 1974. Geschichtsphilosophie nach Hegel. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar

Schnädelbach, Herbert. 1984. Philosophie in Deutschland 1831–1933. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Schnitzler, Arthur. 1908. Der Weg ins Freie. Berlin: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1844. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar

Simmel, George. 1999. “Deutschlands innere Wandlung,” Der Krieg und die geistigen Entscheidungen. In Simmel, George, Gesamtausgabe, vol. XVI. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 7–58.Google Scholar

Simpson, Christopher. 1994. Science of Coercion: Communication Research and Psychological Warfare, 1945–1960. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Soames, Scott. 2014. “The Place of Quine in Analytic Philosophy,” in A Companion to W. V. O. Quine, ed. Harman, Gilbert and Lepore, Ernest. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 432–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sombart, Werner. 1915. Händler und Helden. Munich and Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Stegmaier, Werner. 1992. Philosophie der Fluktuanz. Dilthey und Nietzsche. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, Edith. 2012. On the Problem of Empathy, trans. Stein, Waltraut. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Stern, Paul. 1897. Einfühlung und Assoziation in der neueren Ästhetik. Hamburg: L. Voss.Google Scholar

Stöcker, Helene. 2015. Lebenserinnerungen: Die unvollendete Autobiographie einer frauenbewegten Pazifistin. Köln: Böhlau Köln.Google Scholar

Strock, Joachim W. and Kisiel, Theodore. 1992/1993. “Martin Heidegger und die Anfänge der Deutschen Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte. Eine Dokumentation.” Dilthey-Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Geschichte der Geisteswissenschaften 8: 181–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stueber, Karsten R. 2006. Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk-Psychology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stueber, Karsten R. 2008. “Reasons, Generalizations, Empathy, and Narratives: The Epistemic Structure of Action Explanation.” History and Theory 47, 1: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stueber, Karsten R. 2012. “Varieties of Empathy, Neuroscience and the Narrativist Challenge to the Contemporary Theory of Mind Debate.” Emotion Review 4, 1: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 1980. “Understanding in Human Science.” Review of Metaphysics 34, 1: 25–38.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 1985a. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 1985b. Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Throop, C. J. 2008. “On the Problem of Empathy: The Case of Yap, Federated States of Micronesia.” Ethos 36, 4: 402–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titchener, Edward B. 1909. Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of Thought-Processes. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1979. “Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy: A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity,” in Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication, ed. Bullowa, Margaret. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 321–347.Google Scholar

Trevarthen, Colwyn and Hubley, Penelope. 1978. “Secondary Intersubjectivity: Confidence, Confiding and Acts of Meaning in the First Year,” in Action, Gesture, and Symbol: The Emergence of Language, ed. Lock, Andrew. London: Academic Press, 183–229.Google Scholar

Troeltsch, Ernst. 1915. “Der Kulturkrieg. Rede am 1. Juli 1915,” in Deutsche Reden in schwerer Zeit, vol. III. Berlin: Carl Heymanns, 207–249.Google Scholar

Uebel, Thomas. 2010. “Opposition to Verstehen in Orthodox Logical Empiricism,” in Historical Perspectives on Erklären and Verstehen, ed. Feest, Uljana. Dordrecht: Springer, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan, and Ross, Eleanor. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vischer, Robert. 1893. Über ästhetische Naturbetrachtung. Leipzig: Deutsche Rundschau.Google Scholar

Volkelt, Johannes. 1905. System der Ästhetik. München: Beck.Google Scholar

Wagner, Klaus. 1906. Krieg: eine politisch-entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Jena: Costenoble.Google Scholar

Weingart, Peter. 1995. “‘Struggle for Existence’: Selection and Retention of a Metaphor,” in Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors, ed. Maasen, Sabine, Mendelsohn, Everett, and Weingart, Peter. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Gail. 1991. “Dilthey’s Conception of Objectivity in the Human Studies: A Reply to Gadamer.” Man and the World 24, 4: 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wellek, René. 1966. A History of Modern Criticism 1750–1950, vols. I–V. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. 1765. Reflections on the Painting and Sculpture of the Greeks, trans. Fuseli, Henry. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969a. On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. and trans. Paul, Denis and Anscombe, G. E. M.. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969b. The Blue and Brown Books: Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations.” New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1970. Zettel, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. and trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1975. Philosophical Remarks, ed. Rhees, Rush. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1978. Remarks on Colour, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and trans. McAlister, Linda L. and Schättle, Margarete. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980a. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. II, ed. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki and trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980b. Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge, 1930–1932, ed. Lee, Desmond. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1982. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. I: Preliminary Studies for Part 2 of “Philosophical Investigations,” ed. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki and trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1983. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1992. Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. II: The Inner and the Outer, ed. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, Heikki and trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, Maximilian A. E.. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1993. Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951, ed. Klagge, James and Nordmann, Alfred. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001a. Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001b. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001c. Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge, 1932–1935, ed. Ambrose, Alice. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2005. Philosophical Grammar, ed. Rhees, Rush and trans. Kenney, Anthony. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Zahavi, Dan. 2005. Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zahavi, Dan. 2009. “Review of Evan Thompson. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind.” Husserl Studies 25: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zahavi, Dan. 2010. “Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz.” Inquiry 53, 3: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zahavi, Dan. 2014a. “Empathy and Other-Directed Intentionality.” Topoi 33, 1: 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zahavi, Dan. 2014b. Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zöckler, Christofer. 1975. Dilthey und die Hermeneutik: Diltheys Begründungen der Hermeneutik als Praxiswissenschaft und die Geschichte ihrer Rezeption. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar