Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5f7774ffb-6nplr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-19T10:49:21.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2025

John N. Parker
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Island Time
Theory Groups and the Social Production of Scientific Knowledge
, pp. 229 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abend, Gabriel. 2008. “The Meaning of ‘Theory.’Sociological Theory 26(2):173199.10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamson, Eric. 2009. “Necessary Conditions for the Study of Fads and Fashions in Science.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 25(2):235239.10.1016/j.scaman.2009.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aczel, Amir D. 2009. The Artist and the Mathematician. Hachette UK.Google Scholar
Adger, W. Neil. 2006. “Vulnerability.” Global Environmental Change 16(3):268281.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. Neil, and Brown, Katrina. 2009. “Vulnerability and Resilience to Environmental Change: Ecological and Social Perspectives.” Pp. 109122 in A Companion to Environmental Geography. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. Neil, Hughes, Terence, Folke, Carl, Carpenter, Stephen, and Rockström, Johan. 2005. “Social-Ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 309(5737):10361039.10.1126/science.1112122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahl, Valerie, and Allen, T. F. H.. 1996. Hierarchy Theory. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Albarrán, Pedro, Crespo, Juan A., Ortuño, Ignacio, and Ruiz-Castillo, Javier. 2011. “The Skewness of Science in 219 Sub-Fields and a Number of Aggregates.” Scientometrics 88(2):385397.10.1007/s11192-011-0407-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Mathieu, Laberge, Suzanne, Hodges, Brian D., Regehr, Glenn, and Lingard, Lorelei. 2008. “Biomedical Scientists’ Perception of the Social Sciences in Health Research.” Social Science & Medicine 66(12):25202531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, D. E. 2013. “Resilience and Disaster Risk Reduction: An Etymological Journey.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13(11):27072716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. F. H., and Starr, Thomas B.. 2017. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226489711.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsterdamska, Olga. 2008. “Practices, Places, and People.” Pp. 205210 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., and Wajcman, J.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Anderies, John M., and Janssen, Marco A.. 2013. “Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems: Implications for Public Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 41(3):513536.10.1111/psj.12027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderies, John M., Janssen, Marco A., and Ostrom, Elinor. 2004. “A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective.” Ecology and Society 9(1):18.10.5751/ES-00610-090118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon, . 2012. “United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio+20: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform.” Retrieved April 14, 2024 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/rio20.Google Scholar
Arrow, Holly, McGrath, Joseph, and Berdahl, Jennifer. 2000. Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation. Sage Publishing.10.4135/9781452204666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, Alexander. 1855. The Senses and the Intellect. J. W. Parker.10.1037/12115-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, Robert Freed. 1950. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
Barbalet, J. M. 1999. “Boredom and Social Meaning.” The British Journal of Sociology 50(4):631646.10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00631.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbalet, Jack, ed. 2002. Emotions and Sociology. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barbalet, Jack. 2006. “Emotional Payoffs of Ritual.” European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv Für Soziologie 47(3):446451.10.1017/S0003975606000191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Sarah J., Harris, Celia B., and Rajaram, Suparna. 2015. “Why Two Heads Apart Are Better Than Two Heads Together: Multiple Mechanisms Underlie the Collaborative Inhibition Effect in Memory.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41(2):559566.Google Scholar
Barnier, Amanda, Klein, Louis, and Harris, Celia. 2017. “Transactive Memory in Small, Intimate Groups: More Than the Sum of Their Parts.” Small Group Research 49(1):6297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Jill S., Specht, Alison, Garnier, Eric, Bishop, Pamela, Campbell, C. Andrew, Davis, Frank W., Fady, Bruno, Field, Dawn, Gross, Louis J., Guru, Siddeswara M., Halpern, Benjamin S., Hampton, Stephanie E., Leavitt, Peter R., Meagher, Thomas R., Ometto, Jean, Parker, John N., Price, Richard, Rawson, Casey H., Rodrigo, Allen, Sheble, Laura A., and Winter, Marten. 2017. “Synthesis Centers as Critical Research Infrastructure.” BioScience 67(8):750759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, Daniel J., Cohen, Robin R., Burke, Michael J., and McLendon, Christy L.. 2003. “Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88(6):9891004.10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becher, Tony and Trowler, Paul. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Discipline. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. 2012. Integrating Scientific Disciplines: Case Studies from the Life Sciences. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Hunt, Scott A.. 1992. “Dramaturgy and Social Movements: The Social Construction and Communication of Power.” Sociological Inquiry 62(1):3655.10.1111/j.1475-682X.1992.tb00182.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, Jan, Angelstam, Per, Elmqvist, Thomas, Emanuelsson, Urban, Folke, Carl, Ihse, Margareta, Moberg, Fredrik, and Nyström, Magnus. 2003. “Reserves, Resilience and Dynamic Landscapes.” Ambio 32:389396.10.1579/0044-7447-32.6.389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkes, Fikret, Folke, Carl, and Colding, Johan. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berkes, Fikret, Colding, Johan, and Folke, Carl, eds. 2002a. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berkes, Fikret, Colding, Johan, and Folke, Carl. 2002b. “Synthesis: Building Resilience and Adaptive Capacity in Social-Ecological Systems.” Pp. 352387 in Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, edited by Berkes, Fikret, Colding, Johan, and Folke, Carl. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Besbris, Max, and Khan, Shamus. 2017. “Less Theory. More Description.” Sociological Theory 35(2):147153.10.1177/0735275117709776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettencourt, Luís M. A., and Kaur, Jasleen. 2011. “Evolution and Structure of Sustainability Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(49):1954019545.10.1073/pnas.1102712108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biermann, Maureen, Hillmer-Pegram, Kevin, Knapp, Corrine, and Hum, Richard. 2016. “Approaching a Critical Turn? A Content Analysis of the Politics of Resilience in Key Bodies of Resilience Literature.” Resilience 4(2):5978.10.1080/21693293.2015.1094170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, Reinette, Schlüter, Maja, Bohensky, Erin, BurnSilver, Shauna, Cundill, Georgina, Dakos, Vasilis, Daw, Tim, Evans, Kotschy, Leitch, Anne, Meek, Chanda, Quinlan, Allyson, Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara, Robards, Martin, Schoon, Michael, Schultz, Lisen, and West, Paul. 2012. “Towards Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37(10):421448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, Reinette, Schlüter, Maja, and Schoon, Michael L.. 2015. Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316014240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Charlotte. 2002. “Managing the Emotions of Competition and Recognition in Academia.” The Sociological Review 50(S2):113131.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2002.tb03594.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Charlotte. 2012. Passion and Paranoia: Emotions and the Culture of Emotion in Academia. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boix Mansilla, Veronica, Lamont, Michèle, and Sato, Kyoko. 2016. “Shared Cognitive–Emotional–Interactional Platforms: Markers and Conditions for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(4):571612.10.1177/0162243915614103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boncourt, Thibaud, Koch, Susanne, and Matviichuk, Elena. 2023. “International Scientific Associations and Conferences as Agents in the Unequal Circulation of Knowledge.” Pp. 169181 in Routledge Handbook of Academic Knowledge Circulation, edited by Keim, Weibke et al. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Barry, and Youtie, Jan. 2017. The Strength in Numbers: The New Science of Team Science. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, Fridolin Simon, and Jax, Kurt. 2007. “Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object.” Ecology and Society 12(1):23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, Gordon. 2022. “Dueling with Dual-Process Models: Cognition, Creativity, and Context.” Sociological Theory 40(2):179201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Katrina. 2012. “Policy Discourses of Resilience.” Pp. 3750 in Climate Change and the Crisis of Capitalism, edited by Pelling, Mark, Manuel-Navarrete, David, and Redclift, Michael. Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Katrina. 2015. Resilience, Development and Global Change. Routledge.10.4324/9780203498095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Katrina, and Westaway, Elizabeth. 2011. “Agency, Capacity, and Resilience to Environmental Change: Lessons from Human Development, Well-Being, and Disasters.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36(1):321–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet, Lucas. 2024. “Transposing Emotions to Conserve Nature? The Positive Politics of the Metrics of Ecosystem Services.” Science as Culture 33(1):1640.10.1080/09505431.2022.2151426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet, Lucas, and Müller, Ruth. 2023. “The Feeling Rules of Peer Review: Defining, Displaying, and Managing Emotions in Evaluation for Research Funding.” Minerva 62:167192.10.1007/s11024-023-09518-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burri, Regula, and Dumit, Joseph. 2008. “Social Studies of Scientific Imaging and Visualization.” Pp. 297317 in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Hackett, Edward J., Amsterdamska, Olga, Lynch, Michael, and Wajcman, Judith. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 2007. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cairns, John, Stent, Gunther S., and Watson, James. 1966. Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Cold Springs Harbor Lab.Google Scholar
Cameron, Laura, and Forrester, John. 2000. “Tansley’s Psychoanalytic Network: An Episode out of the Early History of Psychoanalysis in England.” Psychoanalysis and History 2(2):189256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles. 2020. Veblen. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles, and Gross, Neil. 2004. “The New Sociology of Ideas.” Pp. 236249 in The Blackwell Companion to Sociology, edited by Blau, Judith R.. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470693452.ch17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil, and Lamont, Michèle. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Stephen R., Walker, Brian, Anderies, J. Marty, and Abel, Nick. 2001. “From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What?Ecosystems 4(8):765781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Stephen R., Ludwig, D., and Brock, W. A.. 1999. “Management of Eutrophication for Lakes Subject to Potentially Irreversible Change.” Ecological Applications 9(3):751771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Stephen R., and Peterson, Garry D.. 2019. “C. S. ‘Buzz’ Holling, 6 December 1930 – 16 August 2019.” Nature Sustainability 2(11):997998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrigan, Coleen, Tanguay, Saejin Kwak, Yen, Joyce, Ivy, Julie Simmons, Margherio, Cara, Horner-Devine, M. Claire, Riskin, Eve A., and Grant, Christine S.. 2023. “Negotiating Boundaries: An Intersectional Collaboration to Advance Women Academics in Engineering.” Engineering Studies 15(1):121.10.1080/19378629.2023.2169613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Johan S. G., and Evans, James A.. 2021. “Slowed Canonical Progress in Large Fields of Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(41):e2021636118.10.1073/pnas.2021636118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chubin, Daryl E. 1976. “State of the Field: The Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties.” The Sociological Quarterly 17(4):448476.10.1111/j.1533-8525.1976.tb01715.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubin, Daryl E., and Hackett, Edward J.. 1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U. S. Science Policy. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Clark, William C. 2007. “Sustainability Science: A Room of Its Own.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(6):17371738.10.1073/pnas.0611291104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, William C., and Harley, Alicia G.. 2020. “Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 45:331386.10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-043621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, Frederic E. 1936. “Nature and Structure of the Climax.” Journal of Ecology 24(1):252284.10.2307/2256278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colding, Johan, and Barthel, Stephan. 2019. “Exploring the Social-Ecological Systems Discourse 20 Years Later.” Ecology and Society 24(1):2.10.5751/ES-10598-240102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1968. “Review of Studies in Ethnomethodology.” American Sociological Review 33(1):126130.10.2307/2092246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahon, James E.. 1993. “Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87(4):845855.10.2307/2938818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry. 2019. Gravity’s Shadow: The Search for Gravitational Waves. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. 2001. “Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire.” Social Studies of Science 31(1):7185.10.1177/030631201031001004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1981. “On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology.” American Journal of Sociology 86(5):9841014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2000. “Situational Stratification: A Micro-Macro Theory of Inequality.” Sociological Theory 18(1):1743.10.1111/0735-2751.00086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2002. “On the Acrimoniousness of Intellectual Disputes.” Common Knowledge 8(1):4770.10.1215/0961754X-8-1-47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004a. “Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work.” Social Forces 83(1):433436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004b. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004c. “Rituals of Solidarity and Security in the Wake of Terrorist Attack.” Sociological Theory 22(1):5387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2008. Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2020. Charisma: Micro-Sociology of Power and Influence. Routledge & CRC Press.10.4324/9780429353314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall, and Guillén, Mauro F.. 2012. “Mutual Halo Effects in Cultural Production: The Case of Modernist Architecture.” Theory and Society 41(6):527556.10.1007/s11186-012-9181-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, Joseph H., and Sousa, Wayne P.. 1983. “On the Evidence Needed to Judge Ecological Stability or Persistence.” The American Naturalist 121(6):789824.10.1086/284105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corte, Ugo. 2012. Subcultures and Small Groups: A Social Movement Theory Approach. Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Corte, Ugo. 2013. “A Refinement of Collaborative Circles Theory: Resource Mobilization and Innovation in an Emerging Sport.” Social Psychology Quarterly 76(1):2551.10.1177/0190272512470147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corte, Ugo. 2022. Dangerous Fun: The Social Lives of Big Wave Surfers. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226820446.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corte, Ugo, Parker, John N., and Fine, Gary Alan. 2019. “The Microsociology of Creativity and Creative Work.” Social Psychology Quarterly 82(4):333339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1957. “Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change.” The British Journal of Sociology 8(3):197207.10.2307/586859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1974. Greedy Institutions; Patterns of Undivided Commitment. Free Press.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1975. “Presidential Address: Two Methods in Search of a Substance.” American Sociological Review 40(6):691700.10.2307/2094174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, Marci D. 2012. “Interaction Ritual Theory and Sports Fans: Emotion, Symbols, and Solidarity.” Sociology of Sport Journal 29(2):168185.10.1123/ssj.29.2.168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, Marci D. 2022. Practical Feelings: Emotions as Resources in a Dynamic World. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197613689.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Amanda Barrett. 2016. “Mechanisms of Organizational Commitment: Adding Frames to Greedy Institution Theory.” Sociological Forum 31(3):685708.10.1111/socf.12269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana. 1969a. “Fashion in Science: Does It Exist?Social Problems 16(4):433441.10.2307/799952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana. 1969b. “Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the ‘Invisible College’ Hypothesis.” American Sociological Review 34(3):335352.10.2307/2092499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Diana. 1972. Invisible Colleges; Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crow, Michael M., and Dabars, William B.. 2020. The Fifth Wave. Johns Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.73164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 2008. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 2014. “Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity.” Pp. 4761 in The Systems Model of Creativity: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, edited by Csikszentmihalyi, M.. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Jonathon N., and Kiesler, Sara. 2007. “Coordination Costs and Project Outcomes in Multi-University Collaborations.” Research Policy 36(10):16201634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha, and Mäler, Karl-Göran, eds. 2004. The Economics of Non-Convex Ecosystems. Springer.10.1007/1-4020-2515-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, James R. 1982. Street Gangs: Youth, Biker and Prison Groups. Kendall Hunt Pub Co.Google Scholar
De Dreu, Carsten K. W., and West, Michael A.. 2001. “Minority Dissent and Team Innovation: The Importance of Participation in Decision Making.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86(6):11911201.10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Solla Price, Derek J., and Beaver, Donald. 1966. “Collaboration in an Invisible College.” American Psychologist 21(11):10111018.10.1037/h0024051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Bregje, and Pieters, Jules. 2007. “Knowledge Sharing at Conferences.” Educational Research and Evaluation 13(3):237247.10.1080/13803610701626168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dentler, Robert A., and Erikson, Kai T.. 1959. “The Functions of Deviance in Groups.” Social Problems 7(2):98107.10.2307/799160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desjardins, Eric, Barker, Gillian, Lindo, Zoë, Dieleman, Catherine, and Dussault, Antoine C.. 2015. “Promoting Resilience.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 90(2):147165.10.1086/681439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewey, J. 1938/2013. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Read Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Douglas, Jack D., and Johnson, John M., eds. 1977. Existential Sociology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Draper, Scott. 2019. Religious Interaction Ritual: The Microsociology of the Spirit. Rowman & Littlefield.10.5040/9781978730441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duit, Andreas, Galaz, Victor, Eckerberg, Katarina, and Ebbesson, Jonas. 2010. “Governance, Complexity, and Resilience.” Global Environmental Change 20(3):363368.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1951. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edge, David O. 1976. Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain. Wiley.Google Scholar
Egbert, Henrik. 2018. “The Gift and Open Science.” Bulgarian Economic Papers 4:120.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. University of California Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Erard, Michael. 2004. “THINK TANK; Where to Get a Good Idea: Steal It outside Your Group.” The New York Times, May 22.Google Scholar
Erikson, Kai. 1966. Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance. Wiley.Google Scholar
Farrell, Michael. 2003. Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, Michael, Schmidt, Madeline, and Heinemann, Gloria. 2001. “Informal Roles and the Stages of Interdisciplinary Team Development.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 15(3):281295.10.1080/13561820120068980CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farzin, Sina, Guggenheim, Michael, and Krause, Monika. 2024. “Special Issue: The Elements of Theorizing.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 25(2):135144.10.1080/1600910X.2024.2388530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1962. “Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism.” Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science 3:2893.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1979. “Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little League Baseball Teams.” American Sociological Review 44(5):733745.10.2307/2094525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 2005. “Interaction Ritual Chains.” Social Forces 83(3):12871288.10.1353/sof.2005.0029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 2012. Tiny Publics: A Theory of Group Action and Culture. Russell SAGE Foundation.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 2014. “The Hinge: Civil Society, Group Culture, and the Interaction Order.” Social Psychology Quarterly 77(1):526.10.1177/0190272514522769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 2021. The Hinge: Civil Society, Group Cultures, and the Power of Local Commitments. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226745831.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Corte, Ugo. 2017. “Group Pleasures: Collaborative Commitments, Shared Narrative, and the Sociology of Fun.” Sociological Theory 35(1):6486.10.1177/0735275117692836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Hallett, Tim. 2022. Group Life: An Invitation to Local Sociology. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Harrington, Brooke. 2004. “Tiny Publics: Small Groups and Civil Society.” Sociological Theory 22(3):341356.10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00223.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fireman, Bruce, and Gamson, William A.. 1979. “Utilitarian Logic in the Resource Mobilization Perspective.” Pp. 844 in The Dynamics of Social Movements: Resource Mobilization, Social Control, and Tactics, edited by Zald, M. and McCarthy, J.. Winthrop Publishing.Google Scholar
Fisher, Charles S. 1966. “The Death of a Mathematical Theory: A Study in the Sociology of Knowledge.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 3(2):137159.10.1007/BF00357267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Charles S. 1967. “The Last Invariant Theorists A Sociological Study of the Collećtive Biographies of Mathematical Specialiśts.” European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie 8(2):216244.10.1017/S0003975600001521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Ludwik. 1981. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226190341.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Ludwik. 1986. “Scientific Observation and Perception in General.” Pp. 5978 in Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, edited by Cohen, R. S. and Schnelle, T.. Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-4498-5_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, Carl. 2006. “Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social–Ecological Systems Analyses.” Global Environmental Change 16(3):253267.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, Carl, Carpenter, Stephen R., Walker, Brian, Scheffer, Marten, Chapin, Terry, and Rockström, Johan. 2010. “Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability.” Ecology and Society 15(4):20.10.5751/ES-03610-150420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, Carl, Carpenter, Steve, Walker, Brian, Scheffer, Marten, Elmqvist, Thomas, Gunderson, Lance, and Holling, C. S.. 2004. “Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35(1):557581.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, Donelson R. 2018. Group Dynamics. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Fragouli, Evangelia. 2018. “The Dark-Side of Charisma and Charismatic Leadership.” The Business & Management Review 9(4):298307.Google Scholar
Frank, David John, and Meyer, John W.. 2020. The University and the Global Knowledge Society. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freeth, Rebecca, and Caniglia, Guido. 2020. “Learning to Collaborate While Collaborating: Advancing Interdisciplinary Sustainability Research.” Sustainability Science 15(1):247261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenette, Alexandre. 2017. “The Rise of Creative Placemaking: Cross-Sector Collaboration as Cultural Policy in the United States.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 47(5):333345.10.1080/10632921.2017.1391727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frickel, Scott, and Gross, Neil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review 70(2):204232.10.1177/000312240507000202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frickel, Scott, and Moore, Kelly. 2006. The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Joan H. 1987. “Constructing ‘Do-Able’ Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment.” Social Studies of Science 17(2):257293.10.1177/030631287017002003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, Joan H. 1992. “Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects, and ‘Translation.’” Pp. 168211 in Science as Practice, edited by Pickering, Andrew. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1989. Cults: Faith, Healing, and Coercion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 2013. “Charismatic Groups and Cults: A Psychological and Social Analysis.” Pp. 729740 in APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality (Vol 1): Context, Theory, and Research, edited by Pargament, K. I., Exline, J. J., and Jones, J. W.. American Psychological Association.10.1037/14045-041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, Lynch, Michael, and Livingston, Eric. 1981. “The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(2):131158.10.1177/004839318101100202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Robert, Okuleye, Yewande, Garner, Robert, and Okuleye, Yewande. 2020. The Oxford Group and the Emergence of Animal Rights: An Intellectual History. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197508497.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Hannah. 2013. Silwood Circle: A History of Ecology and the Making of Scientific Careers in Late Twentieth-Century Britain. Imperial College Press.10.1142/p879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 2013. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 2006. “City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies.” Social Studies of Science 36(1):538.10.1177/0306312705054526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godart, Frédéric, Seong, Sorah, and Phillips, Damon J.. 2020. “The Sociology of Creativity: Elements, Structures, and Audiences.” Annual Review of Sociology 46(1):489510.10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Alice. 2019. “Go to More Parties? Social Occasions as Home to Unexpected Turning Points in Life Trajectories.” Social Psychology Quarterly 82(1):5174.10.1177/0190272518812010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 2013. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Martino Fine Books.Google Scholar
Golden, Gloria Y. 1994. “On the Way to Jupiter: Psychological Dimensions of the Galileo Mission.” Social Studies of Science 24(3):463511.10.1177/030631279402400302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodstein, David. 2001. “In Defense of Robert Andrews Millikan: The Creator of the Famous Oil-Drop Experiment for Measuring the Electron’s Charge Has Been Criticized for His Treatment of Students, Women, Jews – and Even Data.” American Scientist 89(1):5460.10.1511/2001.14.54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1966. Enter Plato. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1967. Enter Plato: Classical Greece and the Origins of Social Theory. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gratzer, Walter. 2004. Eurekas and Euphorias: The Oxford Book of Scientific Anecdotes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Shane, and Zhu, Feng. 2014. “Do Experts or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia.” Harvard Business School Working Paper 15-023.Google Scholar
Griffith, Belver C., and Mullins, Nicholas C.. 1972. “Coherent Social Groups in Scientific Change.” Science 177(4053):959964.10.1126/science.177.4053.959CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, Neil. 2002. “Becoming a Pragmatist Philosopher: Status, Self-Concept, and Intellectual Choice.” American Sociological Review 67(1):5286.10.1177/000312240206700103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2003. “Richard Rorty’s Pragmatism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Ideas.” Theory and Society 32(1):93148.10.1023/A:1023018131572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2008a. “Comment on Neil McLaughlin/3.” Sociologica (2/2008).Google Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2008b. Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226309910.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil, and Fleming, Crystal. 2012. “Academic Conferences and the Making of Philosophical Knowledge.” Pp. 151180 in Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil, and Lamont, Michele. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grosskurth, Phyllis. 1993. The Secret Ring: Freud’s Inner Circle and the Politics of Psychoanalysis. MacFarlane Walter & Ross.Google Scholar
Gruber, Howard E. 1981. “On the Relation between AHA Experiences’ and the Construction of Ideas.” History of Science 19(1):4159.10.1177/007327538101900104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, Lance H., Allen, Craig Reece, and Holling, C. S. 2009. Foundations of Ecological Resilience. Island Press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Lance H., and Holling, C. S.. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Lance H., and Pritchard, Lowell. 2002. Resilience and the Behavior of Large-Scale Systems. Island Press.Google Scholar
Hackett, Edward J. 2005. “Essential Tensions: Identity, Control, and Risk in Research.” Social Studies of Science 35(5):787826.10.1177/0306312705056045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, Edward J., Conz, David, Parker, John, Bashford, Jonathon, and DeLay, Susan. 2004. “Tokamaks and Turbulence: Research Ensembles, Policy, and Technoscientific Work.” Research Policy 33(5):747767.10.1016/j.respol.2003.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, Edward J., Leahey, Erin, Parker, John N., Rafols, Ismael, Hampton, Stephanie E., Corte, Ugo, Chavarro, Diego, Drake, John M., Penders, Bart, Sheble, Laura, Vermeulen, Niki, and Vision, Todd J.. 2021. “Do Synthesis Centers Synthesize? A Semantic Analysis of Topical Diversity in Research.” Research Policy 50(1):104069.10.1016/j.respol.2020.104069CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackett, Edward J., and Parker, John N.. 2011. “Leadership of Scientific Groups.” Pp. 165175 in Leadership in Science and Technology: A Reference Handbook, edited by Bainbridge, W. S.. SAGE.Google Scholar
Hackett, Edward J., and Parker, John N.. 2016. “From Salomon’s House to Synthesis Centers.” Pp. 5387 in Institutional and Organizational Innovation in Science, edited by Heinze, T. and Münch, R.. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hackett, Edward J., Parker, John N., Conz, David, Rhoten, Diana, and Parker, Andrew. 2008. “Ecology Transformed: The National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis and the Changing Patterns of Ecological Research.” Pp. 277296 in Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, edited by Olson, G. M., Zimmerma, A., and Bos, N.. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7482.003.0023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrom, Warren O. 1965. The Scientific Community. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Halmos, Paul R. 1957. “Nicolas Bourbaki.” Scientific American 196(5):88102.10.1038/scientificamerican0557-88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Stephanie E., and Parker, John N.. 2011. “Collaboration and Productivity in Scientific Synthesis.” BioScience 61(11):900910.10.1525/bio.2011.61.11.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Jerry B. 1974. “The Abilene Paradox: The Management of Agreement.” Organizational Dynamics 3(1):6380.10.1016/0090-2616(74)90005-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Sarah. 2013. “A Different Perspective: The Multiple Effects of Deep Level Diversity on Group Creativity.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(5):822832.10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Sarah. 2014. “Creative Synthesis: Exploring the Process of Extraordinary Group Creativity.” Academy of Management Review 39(3):324343.10.5465/amr.2012.0224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawlina, Hana, Gillespie, Alex, and Zittoun, Tania. 2019. “Difficult Differences: A Socio-Cultural Analysis of How Diversity Can Enable and Inhibit Creativity.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 53(2):133144.10.1002/jocb.182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbron, Johan. 2012. “Practical Foundations of Theorizing in Sociology: The Case of Pierre Bourdieu.” Pp. 181206 in Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil, and Lamont, Michele. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Lasse Folke, Seabrooke, Leonard, and Young, Kevin L.. 2022. “Intellectual Rivalry in American Economics: Intergenerational Social Cohesion and the Rise of the Chicago School.” Socio-Economic Review 20(3):9891013.10.1093/ser/mwac024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermanowicz, Joseph C. 1998. The Stars Are Not Enough: Scientists – Their Passions and Professions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hermanowicz, Joseph C. 2012. Lives in Science: How Institutions Affect Academic Careers. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hermanowicz, Joseph C. 2013. “The Longitudinal Qualitative Interview.” Qualitative Sociology 36(2):189208.10.1007/s11133-013-9247-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesjedal, Maria Bårdsen. 2023. “Socializing Scientists into Interdisciplinarity by Placemaking in a Multi-Sited Research Center.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 48(5):11101137.10.1177/01622439221100867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Eric L. 1986. “The Creation of Political Solidarity in Social Movement Organizations.” The Sociological Quarterly 27(3):373387.10.1111/j.1533-8525.1986.tb00267.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodbod, Jennifer, and Adger, W. Neil. 2014. “Integrating Social-Ecological Dynamics and Resilience into Energy Systems Research.” Energy Research & Social Science 1:226231.10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1959. “Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism.” The Canadian Entomologist 91(7):385398.10.4039/Ent91385-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1973. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:123.10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1986. “Resilience of Ecosystems: Local Surprise and Global Change.” Pp. 228269 in Global Change, edited by Roederer, J. G. and Malone, T. F.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1996. “Engineering Resilience Versus Ecological Resilience.” Pp. 3143 in Engineering within Ecological Constraints, edited by Schulze, P.. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 2017. Bubbles and Spirals: The Memoirs of CS Buzz Holling. The Resilience Alliance.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S., and Chambers, A. D.. 1973. “Resource Science: The Nurture of an Infant.” BioScience 23(1):1320.10.2307/1296362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, Ernest B. 2002. Prematurity in Scientific Discovery: On Resistance and Neglect. University of California Press.10.1525/9780520927735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, Alf. 2009. “Zero-Sum World: Challenges in Conceptualizing Environmental Load Displacement and Ecologically Unequal Exchange in the World-System.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(3–4):237262.10.1177/0020715209105141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, Alf. 2013. “Revelations of Resilience: From the Ideological Disarmament of Disaster to the Revolutionary Implications of (P)anarchy.” Resilience 1(2):116129.10.1080/21693293.2013.797661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huizenga, John R. 1993. Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century. University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226360492.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurston, Karen. 1994. Growing the World’s Largest Church. Gospel Publishing House.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2007. “Fourth Assessment Report.”Google Scholar
Jaccard, James, and Jacoby, Jacob. 2020. Theory Construction and Model-Building Skills: A Practical Guide for Social Scientists. Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
James, William. 1880. “Great Men, Great Thoughts, and the Environment.” The Atlantic October.Google Scholar
Janis, Irving L. 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Janssen, Marco A. 2007. “An Update on the Scholarly Networks on Resilience, Vulnerability, and Adaptation within the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change.” Ecology and Society 12(2):9.10.5751/ES-02099-120209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Marco A., and Anderies, John M.. 2007. “Robustness Trade-Offs in Social-Ecological Systems.” International Journal of the Commons 1(1):4365.10.18352/ijc.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Marco A., Anderies, John M., and Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. “Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems to Spatial and Temporal Variability.” Society and Natural Resources 20(4):307322.10.1080/08941920601161320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Marco A., Schoon, Michael, Ke, Weimao, and Borner, Katy. 2006. “Scholarly Networks on Resilience, Vulnerability and Adaptation within the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change.” Global Environmental Change 16:240252.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, James M. 2004. “A Strategic Approach to Collective Action: Looking for Agency in Social-Movement Choices.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 9(1):1.10.17813/maiq.9.1.m112677546p63361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, James M. 2014. “Feeling-Thinking: Emotions as Central to Culture.” Pp. 2344 in Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research, edited by Baumgarten, B., Daphi, P., and Ullrich, P.. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, David R. 2017. A Fractured Profession. Johns Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.56357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, John M. 1975. Doing Field Research. Free Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, John M. 2013. “The Contributions of the California Sociologies to the Diversity and Development of Symbolic Interaction.” Pp. 307316 in 40th Anniversary of Studies in Symbolic Interaction, edited by Denzin, N. K.. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1108/S0163-2396(2013)0000040016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanigel, Robert. 1993. Apprentice to Genius. Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801847578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastenhofer, Karen, and Vermeulen, Niki. 2024. “‘Should We Stay or Should We Go Now?’: Dis/Engaging with Emerging Technosciences.” Science & Technology Studies 37(1):2143.Google Scholar
Kaufman, James C., and Beghetto, Ronald A.. 2009. “Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity.” Review of General Psychology 13(1):112.10.1037/a0013688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1984. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Kelman, I. 2008. “Critique of Some Vulnerability and Resilience Papers.” Retrieved April 14, 2024 (www.islandvulnerability.org/docs/vulnrescritique.pdf).Google Scholar
Kelman, I., Gaillard, J. C., Lewis, James, and Mercer, Jessica. 2016. “Learning from the History of Disaster Vulnerability and Resilience Research and Practice for Climate Change.” Natural Hazards 82(S1):129143.10.1007/s11069-016-2294-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, I., Gaillard, J. C., and Mercer, Jessica. 2015. “Climate Change’s Role in Disaster Risk Reduction’s Future: Beyond Vulnerability and Resilience.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6(1):2127.10.1007/s13753-015-0038-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsland, Sharon E. E. 2008. The Evolution of American Ecology, 1890–2000. Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801881718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, Thomas, Brand, Fridolin S., Hoheisel, Deborah, and Grimm, Volker. 2010. “The One-Sidedness and Cultural Bias of the Resilience Approach.” GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 19(1):2532.10.14512/gaia.19.1.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemsdal, Lars, and Clegg, Stewart. 2022. “Defining the Work Situation in Organization Theory: Bringing Goffman Back In.” Culture and Organization 28(6):471484.10.1080/14759551.2022.2090563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemsdal, Lars, Andreassen, Tone Alm, and Breit, Eric. 2022. “Resisting or Facilitating Change? How Street-Level Managers’ Situational Work Contributes to the Implementation of Public Reforms.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 32(4):736749.10.1093/jopart/muac004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karen. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674039681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Robert E. 2002. Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226450117.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojevnikov, Alexei. 2020. The Copenhagen Network: The Birth of Quantum Mechanics from a Postdoctoral Perspective. Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-59188-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krantz, David L. 1971. “The Separate Worlds of Operant and Non-Operant Psychology.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 4(1):6170.10.1901/jaba.1971.4-61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krantz, David L. 1972. “Schools and Systems: The Mutual Isolation of Operant and Non-Operant Psychology as a Case Study.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 8:86102.10.1002/1520-6696(197201)8:1<86::AID-JHBS2300080104>3.0.CO;2-B3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, Monika. 2016. “The Meanings of Theorizing.” The British Journal of Sociology 67(1):2329.10.1111/1468-4446.12187_4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, Monika. 2021. Model Cases: On Canonical Research Objects and Sites. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226780979.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, Charles J. 2022. “Some Historical Thoughts on the Functional Responses of Predators to Prey Density.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10:15.10.3389/fevo.2022.1052289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1974. “Second Thoughts on Paradigms.” Pp. 459482 in The Structure of Scientific Theory, edited by Suppe, F.. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. 2001. “Three Questions for a Big Book: Collins’s The Sociology of Philosophies.” Sociological Theory 19(1):8691.10.1111/0735-2751.00129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674054158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michele, and Lareau, Annette. 1988. “Cultural Capital: Allusions, Gaps and Glissandos in Recent Theoretical Developments.” Sociological Theory 6(2):153168.10.2307/202113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latané, Bibb, Williams, Kipling, and Harkins, Stephen. 1979. “Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(6):822832.10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Leach, Melissa. 2008. “Re-Framing Resilience: Trans-Disciplinarity, Reflexivity and Progressive Sustainability – A Symposium Report.” Brighton, STEPS Centre.Google Scholar
Leach, Melissa, Raworth, Kate, and Rockström, Johan. 2013. “Entre Les Limites Sociales et Planétaires: Évoluer Dans Un Espace Sûr et Juste Pour l’humanité.” Pp. 99104 in Rapport Mondial Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 2013: Changements Environnementaux Globaux. UNESCO.Google Scholar
Leahey, Erin. 2016. “From Sole Investigator to Team Scientist: Trends in the Practice and Study of Research Collaboration.” Annual Review of Sociology 42:81100.10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jooyoung. 2016. Blowin’ Up: Rap Dreams in South Central. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226348926.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, You-Na, and Walsh, John P.. 2022. “Rethinking Science as a Vocation: One Hundred Years of Bureaucratization of Academic Science.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47(5):10571085.10.1177/01622439211026020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leschziner, Vanina, and Brett, Gordon. 2019. “Beyond Two Minds: Cognitive, Embodied, and Evaluative Processes in Creativity.” Social Psychology Quarterly 82(4):340366.10.1177/0190272519851791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Daniel J. 1986. The Seasons of a Man’s Life. Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Lin, Zihang, Yin, Yian, Liu, Lu, and Wang, Dashun. 2023. “SciSciNet: A Large-Scale Open Data Lake for the Science of Science Research.” Scientific Data 10(1):315.10.1038/s41597-023-02198-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingstone, David N. 2013. Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lizardo, Omar. 2014. “The End of Theorists?: The Relevance, Opportunities, and Pitfalls of Theorizing in Sociology Today” Pamphlet based on the Lewis Coser Memorial Lecture, delivered at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association in San Francisco.Google Scholar
Lorimer, Jamie. 2008. “Counting Corncrakes: The Affective Science of the UK Corncrake Census.” Social Studies of Science 38(3):377405.10.1177/0306312707084396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotka, Alfred J. 1926. “The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity.” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16(12):317323.Google Scholar
Ludwig, D., Jones, D. D., and Holling, C. S.. 1978. “Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest.” Journal of Animal Ecology 47(1):315332.10.2307/3939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynam, Timothy, and Brown, Katrina. 2012. “Mental Models in Human–Environment Interactions: Theory, Policy Implications, and Methodological Explorations.” Ecology and Society 17(3):24.10.5751/ES-04257-170324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1985. Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ma, Yifang, Mukherjee, Satyam, and Uzzi, Brian. 2020. “Mentorship and Protégé Success in STEM Fields.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(25):1407714083.10.1073/pnas.1915516117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKinnon, Danny, and Derickson, Kate Driscoll. 2013. “From Resilience to Resourcefulness: A Critique of Resilience Policy and Activism.” Progress in Human Geography 37(2):253270.10.1177/0309132512454775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäki, Uskali, Walsh, Adrian, and Pinto, Manuela Fernández. 2018. Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge.Google Scholar
Manyani, Amanda, Biggs, Reinette, Hill, Lloyd, and Preiser, Rika. 2024. “The Evolution of Social-Ecological Systems (SES) Research: A Co-Authorship and Co-Citation Network Analysis.” Ecology and Society 29(1):33.10.5751/ES-14694-290133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, R. 1963. “On Certain Unifying Principles in Ecology.” The American Naturalist 97(897):357374.10.1086/282286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Margalef, R. 1969. “Diversity and Stability: A Practical Proposal and a Model of Interdependence.” Brookhaven Symposium on Biology 22:2537.Google Scholar
Mashaal, Maurice. 2006. Bourbaki: A Secret Society of Mathematicians. American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
McCracken, Grant. 1988. The Long Interview. SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412986229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Joseph E., Arrow, Holly, and Berdahl, Jennifer L.. 2000. “The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(1):95105.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Robert P. 1986. The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Neil. 2008. “Collaborative Circles and Their Discontents. Revisiting Conflict and Creativity in Frankfurt School Critical Theory.” Sociologica (2/2008).Google Scholar
Meadows, . 1975. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New American Library.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure: Toward the Codification of Theory and Research. Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1957. “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science.” American Sociological Review 22(6):635659.10.2307/2089193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1969. “Behavior Patterns of Scientists.” American Scientist 57(1):123.Google ScholarPubMed
Merton, Robert K. 1970. Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England. Howard Fertig Pub.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1972. “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 78(1):947.10.1086/225294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1987. “Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials.” Annual Review of Sociology 13:129.10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.000245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Thaddeus. 2014. Reconstructing Sustainability Science. Routledge.10.4324/9780203383902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitroff, Ian I. 1974. “Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 39(4):579595.10.2307/2094423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michele-Lee, Tjornbo, Ola, Enfors, Elin, Knapp, Corrie, Hodbod, Jennifer, Baggio, Jacopo A., Norström, Albert, Olsson, Per, and Biggs, Duan. 2014. “Studying the Complexity of Change: Toward an Analytical Framework for Understanding Deliberate Social-Ecological Transformations.” Ecology and Society 19(4):54.10.5751/ES-06966-190454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, Serge. 1976. Social Influence and Social Change. Academic.Google Scholar
Moscovici, Serge, and Zavalloni, Marisa. 1969. “The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12(2):125135.10.1037/h0027568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, Brian, and Copper, Carolyn. 1994. “The Relation between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration.” Psychological Bulletin 115(2):210227.10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, Nicholas C. 1968. “The Distribution of Social and Cultural Properties in Informal Communication Networks among Biological Scientists.” American Sociological Review 33(5):786797.10.2307/2092888CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullins, Nicholas C. 1972. “The Development of a Scientific Specialty: The Phage Group and the Origins of Molecular Biology.” Minerva 10(1):5182.10.1007/BF01881390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, Nicholas C. 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mullins, Nicholas C. 1983. “Theories and Theory Groups Revisited.” Sociological Theory 1:319337.10.2307/202056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murayama, Kota, Nirei, Makoto, and Shimizu, Hiroshi. 2015. “Management of Science, Serendipity, and Research Performance: Evidence from a Survey of Scientists in Japan and the U.S.” Research Policy 44(4):862873.10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen. 1994. Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A Social History. John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/sihols.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen. 1998. American Sociolinguistics: Theorists and Theory Groups. John Benjamins.10.1075/z.86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadasdy, Paul. 2007. “Adaptive Co-Management and the Gospel of Resilience.” Pp. 147179 in Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning and Multilevel Governance, edited by Armitage, D., Berkes, F., and Doubleday, N.. University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Nassauer, Anne. 2019. Situational Breakdowns: Understanding Protest Violence and Other Surprising Outcomes. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190922061.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassauer, Anne, and Legewie, Nicolas M.. 2022. Video Data Analysis: How to Use 21st Century Video in the Social Sciences. SAGE.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council, and Committee on the Science of Team Science. 2015. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Navon, Daniel. 2024. “Reiterated Fact-Making: Explaining Transformation and Continuity in Scientific Facts.” American Sociological Review 89(5):849875.10.1177/00031224241271100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolazzo, Z., and Jourian, T. J.. 2020. “‘I’m Looking for People Who Want to Do Disruption Work’: Trans* Academics and Power Discourses in Academic Conferences.” Gender and Education 32(1):5669.10.1080/09540253.2019.1633461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, Malcolm, McIntosh, Robert, and Nicholson, M.. 2002. “H. A. Gleason and the Individualistic Hypothesis Revisited.” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 83:133142.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, H. Richard. 2016. The Social Sources of Denominationalism. Facsimile Publisher.Google Scholar
Norton, Bryan. 1996. “Change, Constancy, and Creativity: The New Ecology and Some Old Problems.” Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 7:4970.Google Scholar
Nuwer, Hank. 2001. Wrongs of Passage: Fraternities, Sororities, Hazing, and Binge Drinking. Indiana University Press.10.2979/3438.0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Pamela, and Johnston, Hank. 2006. “What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 5(1):3754.10.17813/maiq.5.1.g54k222086346251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Gary M., Zimmerman, Ann, and Bos, Nathan. 2008. Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262151207.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, with a New Preface and Appendix. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674041660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, Lennart, Jerneck, Anne, Thoren, Henrik, Persson, Johannes, and O’Byrne, David. 2015. “Why Resilience Is Unappealing to Social Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations of the Scientific Use of Resilience.” Science Advances 1(4):e1400217.10.1126/sciadv.1400217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsson, Per. 2012. “Transitions, Resilience and Governance: Linking Technological, Ecological and Political Systems – Ecology & Society Special Issue.” Retrieved March 18, 2024 (https://ecologyandsociety.org/feature/51/).Google Scholar
Olsson, Per, Galaz, Victor, and Boonstra, Wiebren J.. 2014. “Sustainability Transformations: A Resilience Perspective.” Ecology and Society 19(4).10.5751/ES-06799-190401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, R. V., Deangelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., and Allen, T. F. H.. 1986. A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, John N. 2006. “Organizational Collaborations and Scientific Integration: The Case of Ecology and the Social Sciences.” Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Parker, John N. 2010. “Integrating the Social into the Ecological: Organizational and Research Group Challenges.” Pp. 85110 in Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, edited by Parker, J. N., Vermeulen, N., and Penders, B.. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Parker, John N., and Corte, Ugo. 2017. “Placing Collaborative Circles in Strategic Action Fields: Explaining Differences between Highly Creative Groups.” Sociological Theory 35(4):261287.10.1177/0735275117740400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, John N., and Crona, Beatrice. 2012. “On Being All Things to All People: Boundary Organizations and the Contemporary Research University.” Social Studies of Science 42(2):262289.10.1177/0306312711435833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, John N., and Hackett, Edward J.. 2012. “Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Scientific Collaborations and Social Movements.” American Sociological Review 77(1):2144.10.1177/0003122411433763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, John N., and Hackett, Edward J.. 2014. “The Sociology of Science and Emotions.” Pp. 549572 in Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions: Volume II, edited by Stets, J. E. and Turner, J. H.. Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-9130-4_26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parolo, Pietro Della Briotta, Pan, Raj Kumar, Ghosh, Rumi, Huberman, Bernardo A., Kaski, Kimmo, and Fortunato, Santo. 2015. “Attention Decay in Science.” Journal of Informetrics 9(4):734745.10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, Paul B., Kohn, Nicholas W., Arditti, Lauren E., and Korde, Runa M.. 2013. “Understanding the Group Size Effect in Electronic Brainstorming.” Small Group Research 44(3):332352.10.1177/1046496413479674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1960. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss: Principles of Philosophy and Elements of Logic. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pelz, Donald Campbell, and Andrews, Frank M.. 1976. Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Penders, Bart, and Nelis, Annemiek P.. 2011. “Credibility Engineering in the Food Industry: Linking Science, Regulation, and Marketing in a Corporate Context.” Science in Context 24(4):487515.10.1017/S0269889711000202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Garry, Allen, Craig R., and Holling, C. S.. 1998. “Ecological Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale.” Ecosystems 1(1):618.10.1007/s100219900002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, Rémy J., Aguinagalde, Itziar, de Beaulieu, Jacques-Louis, Bittkau, Christiane, Brewer, Simon, Cheddadi, Rachid, Ennos, Richard, Fineschi, Silvia, Grivet, Delphine, Lascoux, Martin, Mohanty, Aparajita, Müller-Starck, Gerhard, Demesure-Musch, Brigitte, Palmé, Anna, Martín, Juan Pedro, Rendell, Sarah, and Vendramin, Giovanni G.. 2003. “Glacial Refugia: Hotspots But Not Melting Pots of Genetic Diversity.” Science 300(5625):15631565.10.1126/science.1083264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, Katherine W., and Loyd, Denise Lewin. 2006. “When Surface and Deep-Level Diversity Collide: The Effects on Dissenting Group Members.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99(2):143160.10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226668208.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Steward T. A., and Ostfeld, Richard S.. 1995. “The Shifting Paradigm in Ecology.” Pp. 261–178 in A New Century for Natural Resources Management, edited by Constanza, Robert, Knight, Richard L., Bates, Sarah F., Meine, Curt, and Jacobson, Susan Kay. Island Press.Google Scholar
Pickett, Steward T. A., Burch, William R., Dalton, Shawn E., Foresman, Timothy W., Morgan Grove, J., and Rowntree, Rowan. 1997. “A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Human Ecosystems in Urban Areas.” Urban Ecosystems 1(4):185199.10.1023/A:1018531712889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 2015. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.10.4324/9781315694658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polillo, Simone. 2020. The Ascent of Market Efficiency: Finance That Cannot Be Proven. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca, and Jasper, James M.. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:283305.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Price, D. De Solla. 1986. Little Science, Big Science…and Beyond. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Puddephatt, Antony J. 2008. “Incorporating Ritual into Greedy Institution Theory: The Case of Devotion in Amateur Chess.” The Sociological Quarterly 49(1):155180.10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00110.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Erik Børve, and Johannessen, Lars Emil Fagernes. 2023. “Theorizing Theory: Invitation to a Broader Conversation about ‘Theory’ in Sociology.” Sociology Compass 17(6):e13085.10.1111/soc4.13085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5(2):243263.10.1177/13684310222225432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1938. Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1951. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. University of California Press.10.1525/9780520341760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Walter V. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Island Press.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 1983. The Dynamics of Small Groups. St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Ringelmann, M. 1913. “Recherches Sur Les Moteurs Animés: Travail de l’homme.” Annales de l’Institut National Agronomique 2:140.Google Scholar
Robards, Martin D., Schoon, Michael L., Meek, Chanda L., and Engle, Nathan L.. 2011. “The Importance of Social Drivers in the Resilient Provision of Ecosystem Services.” Global Environmental Change 21(2):522529.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, J., Yletyinen, J., Biggs, R., Blenckner, T., and Peterson, G.. 2015a. “Marine Regime Shifts: Drivers and Impacts on Ecosystems Services.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370(1659):20130273.10.1098/rstb.2013.0273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, Juan Carlos, Peterson, Garry D., and Biggs, Reinette. 2015b. “Regime Shifts in the Anthropocene: Drivers, Risks, and Resilience.” PLoS One 10(8):e0134639.10.1371/journal.pone.0134639CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochon, Thomas R. 1998. Culture Moves: Ideas, Activism, and Changing Values. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691186719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, Johan, Steffen, Will, Noone, Kevin, Persson, Åsa, Chapin, F. Stuart, Lambin, Eric F., Lenton, Timothy M., Scheffer, Marten, Folke, Carl, Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, Nykvist, Björn, de Wit, Cynthia A., Hughes, Terry, van der Leeuw, Sander, Rodhe, Henning, Sörlin, Sverker, Snyder, Peter K., Costanza, Robert, Svedin, Uno, Falkenmark, Malin, Karlberg, Louise, Corell, Robert W., Fabry, Victoria J., Hansen, James, Walker, Brian, Liverman, Diana, Richardson, Katherine, Crutzen, Paul, and Foley, Jonathan A.. 2009. “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature 461(7263):472475.10.1038/461472aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelfs, David J. 2012. “Conflict, Incommensurability, and Theory Groups: A Longitudinal Investigation of Citations in the Organization-Environment Literature.” Journal of Management Inquiry 21(2):199215.10.1177/1056492611403485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. 2011. The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruef, Martin. 2010. The Entrepreneurial Group: Social Identities, Relations, and Collective Action. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salmela, Mikko Erkki Matias, and Mäki, Ismo Uskali. 2018. “Disciplinary Emotions in Imperialistic Interdisciplinarity.” Pp. 3150 in Scientific Imperialism, Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society, edited by Mäki, U., Walsh, A., and Fernández Pinto, M.. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” The American Political Science Review 64(4):10331053.10.2307/1958356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1984. Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Sassatelli, Roberta. 2007. “When Coleman Read Garfinkel.” Sociologica 1:124.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Keith. 2007. Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith. 2004. “The Mechanisms of Emergence.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34(2):260282.10.1177/0048393103262553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, S. 1951. “Deviation, Rejection, and Communication.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 46(2):190207.10.1037/h0062326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schachter, Stanley, and Singer, Jerome. 1962. “Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State.” Psychological Review 69(5):379399.10.1037/h0046234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheff, Thomas J. 1988. “Shame and Conformity: The Deference-Emotion System.” American Sociological Review 53(3):395406.10.2307/2095647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. 1995. “Academic Gangs.” Crime, Law and Social Change 23(2):157162.10.1007/BF01298529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, Marten. 2014. “The Forgotten Half of Scientific Thinking.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(17):6119.10.1073/pnas.1404649111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffer, Marten, Bascompte, Jordi, Bjordam, Tone K., Carpenter, Stephen R., Clarke, Laurie B., Folke, Carl, Marquet, Pablo, Mazzeo, Nestor, Meerhoff, Mariana, Sala, Osvaldo, and Westley, Frances R.. 2015. “Dual Thinking for Scientists.” Ecology and Society 20(2):3.10.5751/ES-07434-200203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, Marten, Brock, William, and Westley, Frances. 2000. “Socioeconomic Mechanisms Preventing Optimum Use of Ecosystem Services: An Interdisciplinary Theoretical Analysis.” Ecosystems 3(5):451471.10.1007/s100210000040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, Marten, Carpenter, Steve, Foley, Jonathan A., Folke, Carl, and Walker, Brian. 2001. “Catastrophic Shifts in Ecosystems.” Nature 413(6856):591596.10.1038/35098000CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, Oswald J. 2017. The New Ecology: Rethinking a Science for the Anthropocene. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400883462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönbauer, Sarah M. 2021. “A Passion for Science: Addressing the Role of Emotions in Identities of Biologists.” Pp. 283301 in Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences, edited by Kastenhofer, K. and Molyneux-Hodgson, S.. Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoon, Michael, Fabricius, Christo, Anderies, John M., and Nelson, Margaret. 2011. “Synthesis: Vulnerability, Traps, and Transformations: Long-Term Perspectives from Archaeology.” Ecology and Society 16(2):24.10.5751/ES-04184-160224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schurman, Rachel, and Munro, William. 2006. “Ideas, Thinkers, and Social Networks: The Process of Grievance Construction in the Anti-Genetic Engineering Movement.” Theory and Society 35(1):138.10.1007/s11186-006-6779-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoones, I. 1999. “New Ecology and the Social Sciences: What Prospects for a Fruitful Engagement?Annual Review of Anthropology 28(1):479507.10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seglen, Per O. 1992. “The Skewness of Science.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(9):628638.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-03.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segre, Gino. 2008. Faust in Copenhagen: A Struggle for the Soul of Physics. Penguin Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Senechal, Marjorie. 1998. “The Continuing Silence of Bourbaki.” The Mathematical Intelligencer 1:2228.10.1007/BF03024395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 2009. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shenk, Joshua Wolf. 2015. Powers of Two: How Relationships Drive Creativity. Harper One.Google Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer, and Sherif, Carolyn. 1953. Groups in Harmony and Tension. Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
Shove, Elizabeth, Pantzar, Mika, and Watson, Matt. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. SAGE.10.4135/9781446250655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shreeve, James. 2005. The Genome War: How Craig Venter Tried to Capture the Code of Life and Save the World. Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Shrum, Wesley. 1984. “Scientific Specialties and Technical Systems.” Social Studies of Science 14(1):6390.10.1177/030631284014001005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrum, Wesley, Chompalov, Ivan, and Genuth, Joel. 2001. “Trust, Conflict and Performance in Scientific Collaborations.” Social Studies of Science 31(5):681730.10.1177/030631201031005002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1964. Conflict / The Web of Group Affiliations. Free Press.Google Scholar
Simms, A., and Nichols, Tommy. 2014. “Social Loafing: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Management 15(1):5867.Google Scholar
Simonton, Dean Keith. 2004. Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. 1993. “A World of Our Own.” Behaviorology 1:115.Google Scholar
Small, Mario Luis, and Calarco, Jessica McCrory. 2022. Qualitative Literacy: A Guide to Evaluating Ethnographic and Interview Research. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Vera, Lawrence, Jennifer L., and Bohland, James. 2021. “The Critical Turn of Resilience: Mapping Thematic Communities and Modes of Critical Scholarship.” The Geographical Journal 187(1):1627.10.1111/geoj.12370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A., Zurcher, Louis A., and Sjoberg, Gideon. 1982. “Interviewing by Comment: An Adjunct to the Direct Question.” Qualitative Sociology 5(4):285311.10.1007/BF00986755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, R. 1947. “The Old Sergeant Syndrome.” Psychiatry 10(3):315321.10.1080/00332747.1947.11022649CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sørensen, Knut H., and Traweek, Sharon. 2021. Questing Excellence in Academia: A Tale of Two Universities. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1956. Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences. Regnery.Google Scholar
Stahl, Frank W. 2001. “Alfred Day Hershey.” National Academy of Sciences 80:142159.Google ScholarPubMed
Stamm, Isabell, Cruz, Allan Discua, and Cailluet, Ludovic. 2019. “Entrepreneurial Groups: Definition, Forms, and Historic Change.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 44(4):741.Google Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(5):601617.10.1177/0162243910377624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starbuck, William H. 2009. “The Constant Causes of Never-Ending Faddishness in the Behavioral and Social Sciences.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 25(1):108116.10.1016/j.scaman.2008.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and Finke, Roger. 2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Steffen, Will, Richardson, Katherine, Rockström, Johan, Cornell, Sarah E., Fetzer, Ingo, Bennett, Elena M., Biggs, Reinette, Carpenter, Stephen R., de Vries, Wim, de Wit, Cynthia A., Folke, Carl, Gerten, Dieter, Heinke, Jens, Mace, Georgina M., Persson, Linn M., Ramanathan, Veerabhadran, Reyers, Belinda, and Sörlin, Sverker. 2015. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.” Science 347(6223):1259855.10.1126/science.1259855CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stent, Gunther S. 1972. “Prematurity and Uniqueness in Scientific Discovery.” Scientific American 227(6):8493.10.1038/scientificamerican1272-84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, N. 2006. Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokols, Daniel, Hall, Kara L., Taylor, Brandie K., and Moser, Richard P.. 2008. “The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(2):7789.10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm. 1988. “The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process.” The Sociological Quarterly 29(2):163178.10.1111/j.1533-8525.1988.tb01249.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strouk, Mayline, and Maisonobe, Marion. 2024. “Field Science and Scientific Collaboration in the Svalbard Archipelago: Beyond Science Diplomacy.” Science and Public Policy 51(5):780794.10.1093/scipol/scae012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers-Effler, Erika Summers-Effler. 2010. Laughing Saints and Righteous Heroes: Emotional Rhythms in Social Movement Groups. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226188676.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Hastie, Reid. 2014. Wiser: Getting beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter. Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 2012. “Theorizing in Sociology and Social Science: Turning to the Context of Discovery.” Theory and Society 41(1):140.10.1007/s11186-011-9161-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 2014a. The Art of Social Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 2014b. Theorizing in Social Science: The Context of Discovery. Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804791199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansley, A. G. 1935. “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms.” Ecology 16(3):284307.10.2307/1930070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepper, Steven Jay. 2002. “Creative Assets and the Changing Economy.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 32(2):159168.10.1080/10632920209596971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Travis. 2017. “Fort Skinner in the Desert: The Emergence and Dissolution of Arizona State University’s Behavior Analysis Program 1955–1970.” Behavior and Social Issues 26:2750.10.5210/bsi.v26i0.7107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, Stefan, and Tavory, Iddo. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory 30(3):167186.10.1177/0735275112457914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, Stefan, and Tavory, Iddo. 2022. Data Analysis in Qualitative Research: Theorizing with Abductive Analysis. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226817729.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tormos-Aponte, Fernando, Brown, Phil, Dosemagen, Shannon, Fisher, Dana R., Frickel, Scott, MacKendrick, Norah, Meyer, David S., and Parker, John N.. 2023. “Pathways for Diversifying and Enhancing Science Advocacy.” Science Advances 9(20):eabq4899.10.1126/sciadv.abq4899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traweek, Sharon. 1992. Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv260711bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troeltsch, E. 1931. The Social Teachings of the Christian Church. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Trueheart, Charles. 1996. “The Next Church.” The Atlantic, August 1.Google Scholar
Tuckman, Bruce W. 1965. “Developmental Sequence in Small Groups.” Psychological Bulletin 63(6):384399.10.1037/h0022100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuckman, Bruce W., and Jensen, Mary Ann C.. 1977. “Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited.” Group & Organization Studies 2(4):419427.10.1177/105960117700200404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B. L. II 2010. “Vulnerability and Resilience: Coalescing or Paralleling Approaches for Sustainability Science?Global Environmental Change 20(4):570576.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Jonathan. 2005. “A New Approach for Theoretically Integrating Micro and Macro Analysis.” Pp. 230260 in The Sage Handbook of Sociology, edited by Calhoun, C. J., Rojek, C., and Turner, B. S.. Sage.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P., and Chubin, Daryl E.. 2020. “The Changing Temptations of Science.” Issues in Science and Technology 36(3):4046.Google Scholar
UNEP. 1980. World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development. Prepared by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
United Nations Panel on Global Sustainability. 2012. “Resilient People, Resilient Planet: A Future Worth Choosing.”Google Scholar
Uttal, William R. 2010. The Immeasurable Mind: The Real Science of Psychology. Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, Niki. 2009. Supersizing Science: On Building Large-Scale Research Projects in Biology. University of Maastricht.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, Niki. 2018. “The Choreography of a New Research Field: Aggregation, Circulation and Oscillation.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50(8):17641784.10.1177/0308518X17725317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertesi, Janet. 2020. Shaping Science: Organizations, Decisions, and Culture on NASA’s Teams. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vitousek, Peter, Mooney, Harold, Lubchenco, Jane, and Melillo, Jerry. 1997. “Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems.” Science 277:494499.10.1126/science.277.5325.494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Brian, Holling, C. S., Carpenter, Stephen R., and Kinzig, Ann. 2004. “Resilience, Adaptability, and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 9(2):5.10.5751/ES-00650-090205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Brian, and Meyers, Jacqueline A.. 2004. “Thresholds in Ecological and Social–Ecological Systems: A Developing Database.” Ecology and Society 9(2):3.10.5751/ES-00664-090203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jeremy, and Cooper, Melinda. 2011. “Genealogies of Resilience: From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation.” Security Dialogue 42(2):143160.10.1177/0967010611399616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, John P., and Lee, You-Na. 2015. “The Bureaucratization of Science.” Research Policy 44(8):15841600.10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Dashun, and Barabási, Albert-László. 2021. The Science of Science. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108610834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, Daniel M. 1987. “Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind.” Pp. 185208 in Theories of Group Behavior, Springer Series in Social Psychology, edited by Mullen, B. and Goethals, G. R.. Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, James K., Corcoran, Katie E., and Stockly, Kate J.. 2021. High on God: How Megachurches Won the Heart of America. Highbridge Audio and Blackstone Publishing.Google Scholar
Wellman, James K., Corcoran, Katie E., and Stockly-Meyerdirk, Kate. 2014. “‘God Is Like a Drug…’: Explaining Interaction Ritual Chains in American Megachurches.” Sociological Forum 29(3):650672.10.1111/socf.12108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, G. R. 1949. “The Development of a Psychological Cult.” American Psychologist 4(10):426426.10.1037/h0058923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werron, T., Brankovic, J., and Ringel, L. 2024. “Theorizing Together.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 25(2):228249.10.1080/1600910X.2023.2259288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westley, Frances R., Tjornbo, Ola, Schultz, Lisen, Olsson, Per, Folke, Carl, Crona, Beatrice, and Bodin, Örjan. 2013. “A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 18(3):27.10.5751/ES-05072-180327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Amanda, Perego, Paolo, and Whiteman, Gail. 2024. “Boundary Conditions for Organizations in the Anthropocene: A Review of the Planetary Boundaries Framework 10 Years On.” Journal of Management Studies 62(4):18111846.10.1111/joms.13150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, Hannah. 2022. “Innovation and Creativity in Creative Industries.” Sociology Compass 16(2):e12956.10.1111/soc4.12956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollschleger, Jason. 2012. “Interaction Ritual Chains and Religious Participation.” Sociological Forum 27(4):896912.10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01361.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. W. 1904. “The N-Rays.” Nature 70(1822):530531.10.1038/070530a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, Anita Williams, Aggarwal, Ishani, and Malone, Thomas W.. 2015. “Collective Intelligence and Group Performance.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 24(6):420424.10.1177/0963721415599543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. “Our Common Future.” Brundtland Commission.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. 2013. “WEF Global Risks Report.”Google Scholar
Worster, Donald. 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Lingfei, Wang, Dashun, and Evans, James A.. 2019. “Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology.” Nature 566(7744):378382.10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Fengli, Lingfei, Wu, and Evans, James. 2022. “Flat Teams Drive Scientific Innovation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119(23):e2200927119.10.1073/pnas.2200927119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Li, and Marinova, Dora. 2013. “Resilience Thinking: A Bibliometric Analysis of Socio-Ecological Research.” Scientometrics 96(3):911927.10.1007/s11192-013-0957-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Li, Marinova, Dora, and Guo, Xiumei. 2015. “Resilience Thinking: A Renewed System Approach for Sustainability Science.” Sustainability Science 10(1):123138.10.1007/s11625-014-0274-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, Xiaolong, Wang, Liang, and Yang, Rebecca J.. 2018. “Exploring the Science of Resilience: Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis.” Natural Hazards 90(1):477510.10.1007/s11069-017-3040-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Truman P., Chase, Jonathan M., and Huddleston, Russell T.. 2001. “Community Succession and Assembly: Comparing, Contrasting and Combining Paradigms in the Context of Ecological Restoration.” Ecological Restoration 19(1):518.10.3368/er.19.1.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanotti, Laura, Ma, Zhao, Johnson, Jennifer, Johnson, David, Yu, David J., Burnham, Morey, and Carothers, Courtney. 2020. “Sustainability, Resilience, Adaptation, and Transformation: Tensions and Plural Approaches.” Ecology and Society 25(3):4.10.5751/ES-11642-250304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriett. 1977. Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • John N. Parker, University of Oslo
  • Book: Island Time
  • Online publication: 05 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222518.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • John N. Parker, University of Oslo
  • Book: Island Time
  • Online publication: 05 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222518.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • John N. Parker, University of Oslo
  • Book: Island Time
  • Online publication: 05 December 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222518.011
Available formats
×