Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-f9nfp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T07:58:15.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Kant and Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2025

Edited by
Claudia Brodsky
Claudia Brodsky
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant and Literary Studies , pp. 187 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bibliography

Alt, Peter-André. Schiller: Leben–Werk–Zeit. 2 Bde. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2000.Google Scholar
Behler, Constantin. “‘Eine unsichtbare und unbegreifliche Gewalt’? Kleist, Schiller, de Man und die Ideologie der Ästhetik.” Athenäum 2 (1992), 131–164.Google Scholar
Beil, Ulrich Johannes. “‘Kenosis’ der idealistischen Ästhetik. Kleists Über das Marionettentheater als Schiller-réécriture.” Kleist-Jahrbuch (2006), 75–99.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blamberger, Günter. Heinrich von Kleist: Biographie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
Brittnacher, Hans Richard. “Das Opfer der Anmut. Die schöne Seele und das Erhabene in Kleists Die Verlobung in St. Domingo.” Aurora: Jahrbuch der Eichendorff-Gesellschaft für die Klassisch-Romantische Zeit 54 (1994), 167–189.Google Scholar
Bronfen, Elisabeth. Die schöne Seele: Erzähltexte von Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Heinrich von Kleist, E. T. A. Hoffmann und anderen. Munich: Goldmann-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. Heinrich von Kleist und die Kantische Philosophie. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard, 1919.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul. “Aesthetic Formalization: Kleist’s Über das Marionettentheater.” In The Rhetoric of Romanticism, ed. de Man, P.. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Eckermann, Johann Peter. Gespräche mit Goethe in den letzten Jahren seines Lebens. Ed. Bergemann, Fritz. 2 vols. Munich: Insel Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
Ensberg, Peter. “Das Gefäß des Inhalts: Zum Verhältnis von Philosophie und Literatur am Beispiel der ‘Kantkrise’ Heinrich von Kleists.” In Beiträge zur Kleist-Forschung, ed. Barthel, Wolfgang and Marquardt, Hans-Jochen. Frankfurt an der Oder: Kleist-Gedenk- und Forschungsstätte, 1991.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred. “Unendliche Annäherung”: Die Anfänge der philosophischen Frühromantik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. London and New York: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Gall, Ulrich. Philosophie bei Heinrich von Kleist: Untersuchung zu Herkunft und Bestimmung des philosophischen Gehalts seiner Schriften. Bonn: Bouvier, 1977.Google Scholar
Greiner, Bernhard. Kleists Dramen und Erzählungen: Experimente zum “Fall der Kunst.” Tübingen und Basel: A. Francke, 2000.Google Scholar
Hart, Gail K. “Anmut’s Gender: The Marionettentheater and Kleist’s Revision of Anmut und Würde.” Women in German Yearbook: Feminist Studies in German Literature and Culture 10 (1995), 83–95.Google Scholar
Heine, Heinrich: Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland. Project Gutenberg. https://gutenberg.spiegel.de/buch/zur-geschichte-der-religion-und-philosophie-in-deutschland-378/1.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Werke in Sechs Bänden. Ed. Weischedel, Wilhelm. Reproduction of Insel Verlag edition of 1964. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1998.Google Scholar
Kleist, Heinrich von. Sämtliche Werke und Briefe. 2 vols. Ed. Helmut Sembdner. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1983.Google Scholar
Konersmann, Ralf. “Die Schöne Seele: Zu einer Gedankenfigur des Antimodernismus.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 36 (1993), 144–173.Google Scholar
Mehigan, Tim. Heinrich von Kleist: Writing after Kant. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2011.Google Scholar
Moser, Christian. Verfehlte Gefühle: Wissen–Darstellen–Begehren bei Kleist und Rousseau. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, 1993.Google Scholar
Muth, Ludwig. Kleist und Kant: Versuch einer neuen Interpretation. Cologne: Kölner Universitätsverlag, 1954.Google Scholar
Phillips, James. The Equivocation of Reason: Kleist Reading Kant. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Safranski, Rüdiger. Schiller oder Die Erfindung des Deutschen Idealismus. Munich and Vienna: Carl Hanser, 2004.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich. Sämtliche Werke. 5 Bde. Hrsg. Riedel, Wolfgang. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Ed. Frank, Manfred. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1977.Google Scholar
Schulz, Gerhard. Kleist: Eine Biographie. Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2007.Google Scholar
Weigel, Sigrid. “Der Körper am Kreuzpunkt von Liebesgeschichte und Rassendiskurs in Heinrich von Kleists Erzählung Die Verlobung in St. Domingo.” Kleist-Jahrbuch (1991), 202–217.Google Scholar
Wittkowski, Wolfgang. “Gerechtigkeit und Loyalität, Ethik und Politik. Kleists Verlobung in St. Domingo und Goethes teilweiser Widerspruch in der Belagerung von Mainz.” Kleist-Jahrbuch (1992), 152–171.Google Scholar
Xylander, Oskar. Heinrich von Kleist und J. J. Rousseau. Berlin: Matthiesen, 1937.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, Theodore. Das Wunderjahr in Jena: Geist und Gesellschaft 1794/95. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1998.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Adorno, Theodor A. Negative Dialectics. Trans. E. B. Ashton. New York and London: Continuum, 1983.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry W. Pickford. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Gesammelte Schriften, 7 Bde. Hrsg. Rolf Tiedemann and Hermann Schweppenhäuser in collaboration with Theodor W. Adorno and Gershom Scholem. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1972–1999.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Selected Writings. Ed. Jennings, Michael W., 4 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996–2006.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. The Linguistic Condition: Kant’s Critique of Judgment and the Poetics of Action. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, 9 Bde. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2004.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Of an Apocalyptic Tone Recently Adopted in Philosophy.” Semeia: An Experimental Journal for Biblical Criticism 23 (1982), 63–97.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Mochlos – ou le conflit des facultés.” In Du droit à la philosophie, Jacques Derrida. Paris: Galilée, 1990.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Psyche: Inventions of the Other. Ed. Kamuf, Peggy and Rottenberg, Elizabeth. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Foucault Reader. Ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon, 1984.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Hugo. Montaigne, 3rd ed. Tübingen and Basel: Francke, 1993.Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. Constituting Critique: Kant’s Writing as Critical Praxis. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. The Discipline of Philosophy and the Invention of Modern Jewish Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. “Kant and the Christo Effect: Grounding Aesthetics.” New German Critique 79 (2000), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. “Kritik und Frieden: Zur literarischen Strategie der Schrift Zum Ewigen Frieden.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress, ed. Robinson, Hoke. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. “Metakritik über den Purismus der reinen Vernnuft.” In Hamann’s Schriften, ed. Roth, Friedrich, Hrsg. Leipzig: Reimer, 1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Werke. 30 Bde. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. Identität und Objektivität: Eine Untersuchung über Kants transzendentale Deduktion. Heidelberg: Winter, 1976.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Die Beweisstruktur der transzendentalen Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe – eine Diskussion mit Dieter Henrich.” In Probleme der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft,” ed. Tuschling, Burkhard. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Leipzig: Hartknoch, 1799.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. “Traditional and Critical Theory.” In Horkheimer, Critical Theory: Selected Essays, Max Horkheimer. Trans. Matthew J. O’Connell. New York: Continuum, 1982, pp. 188–243.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” In What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, ed. Schmidt, James. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B.. Trans. Holly Wilson. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Briefwechsel, 3rd ed. Ed. Schöndörffer, Otto and Maler, Rudolf. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1986.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Rede und Gespräch. Ed. Malter, Rudolf. Hamburg: Meiner, 1990.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion and Rational Theology. Ed. Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George Di. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Trans. and ed. Walford, David in collaboration with Ralf Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Ed. Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens or Essay on the Constitution and the Mechanical Origin of the Whole Universe According to Newtonian Principles.” Trans. Olaf Reinhardt. In Natural Sciences, Immanuel Kant. Ed. Watson, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Werkausgabe, 12 Bde. Hrsg. Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1977.Google Scholar
Liebmann, Otto. Kant und die Epigonen: Eine kritische Untersuchung. Stuttgart: Schober, 1985.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. The Reality of the Mass Media. Trans. Kathleen Cross. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd ed. Ed. Tucker, Robert C.. New York and London: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. Werke, 44 Bde. Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus beim ZK der SED. Berlin: Dietz, 1956–1968.Google Scholar
Mbembe, Achille. Critique of Black Reason. Trans. Laurent Dubois. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Works: Essays, Travel Journal, Letters. Trans. Donald M. Frame. New York: Knopf, 2003.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. “Essais.” In Œuvres complètes, Montaigne, Michel de. Ed. Thibaudet, Albert and Rat, Maurice. Paris: Gallimard, 1962.Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter. Critique of Cynical Reason. Trans. Michael Eldred. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Sam. Benjamin’s Abilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Addison, Catherine. A Genealogy of the Verse Novel. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier. “Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13.2 (2005), 312.Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann. The Phantom Table: Woolf, Fry, Russell, and the Epistemology of Modernism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Barnes, Winston H. F. “The Myth of Sense-Data.” In Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing, ed. Robert J, Swartz. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Berrong, Richard M. “Modes of Literary Impressionism.” Genre 39.2 (2006), 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, Bernard. Virginia Woolf: A Commentary. London: Harcourt, 1949.Google Scholar
Bojesen, Emile. “The Education of Consciousness: Virginia Woolf’s The Waves.” Foro de Educación 16 (2018), 99–112.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. The Imposition of Form: Studies in Narrative Representation and Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. The Linguistic Condition: Kant’s Critique of Judgment and the Poetics of Action. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. Words’ Worth: What the Poet Does. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.Google Scholar
Canady, John. Mainstreams of Modern Art: David to Picasso. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1959.Google Scholar
Cascardi, Anthony J. The Bounds of Reason. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Cascardi, Anthony J. Consequences of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascardi, Anthony J. “The Novel.” In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature, ed. Richard Eldridge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. “Review of B. F. Skinner, ‘Verbal Behavior.’” Language 35.1 (1959), 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, James. “Why Kant Is Not a Kantian.” Philosophical Topics 44 (2016), 75–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copland, Sarah. “Conceptual Blending in The Waves.” In Blending and the Study of Narrative: Approaches and Applications, ed. Schneider, Ralph and Hartner, Marcus. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Dalgeron, Emily. “Reality and Perception: Philosophical Approaches to To the Lighthouse.” In The Cambridge Companion to To the Lighthouse, ed. Pease, Allison. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
DiBattista, Maria. Woolf’s Major Novels: The Fables of Anon. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Fernihough, Anne. “Consciousness as a Stream.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Modernist Novel, ed. Shiach, Morag. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1975.Google Scholar
Garrity, Jane. “Global Objects in The Waves.” In A Companion to Virginia Woolf, ed. Berman, Jessica. Miley, MA: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Kant and the Problem of Experience.” Philosophical Topics 34.1–2 (2006), 59–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Kant’s Perceiver,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (2013), 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Spontaneity without Rationality: A Kantian Approach to Self-consciousness and Perceptual Content.” In Perceptual Knowledge and Self-Awareness, ed. Giananti, Andrea, Roessler, Johannes, and Soldati, Gianfranco. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.Google Scholar
Graham, J. W. “Point of View in the Waves: Some Services of the Style.” University of Toronto Quarterly 39.3 (1970), 193–211.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, ed. Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd ed. Ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
James, William. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover, 1950. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan, 1929.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. “Guyer on the Value of Freedom.” In Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity, ed. Moran, Kate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. “A Kantian Critique of Transparency.” In Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason and the Self, ed. Gomes, Anil and Stephenson, Andrew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. Kant’s Thinker, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. “Kant on Self-consciousness.” The Philosophical Review 108.3 (1999), 345–386.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, Chana. On the Margins of Modernism: Decentering Literary Dynamics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, Maya. “The Philosopher’s Bass Drum: Adorno’s Jazz and the Politics of Rhythm.” Radical Philosophy 2.5 (2019), 34–47.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, Maya. “Structure in the Moment: Rhythm Section Responsivity.” Jazz and Culture 4.2, Special Issue, Jazz in the Present Tense (2021), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, Maya. “Toni Morrison’s Jazz as a Theory of Knowledge.” In Spontaneous Form: Consciousness and Philosophical Fiction, Maya Kronfeld (ms. in preparation).Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Land, Thomas. “Kant’s Spontaneity Thesis.” Philosophical Topics 34 (2006), 189–220.Google Scholar
Lodge, David. The Art of Fiction: Illustrated from Classic and Modern Texts. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Françoise. “Color as Cognition in Symboliste Verse.” Critical Inquiry 5.2 (1978), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Kate. “Introduction.” In Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity, ed. Moran, Kate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Parten, M. B. “Social Participation among Preschool Children.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 27.3 (1932), 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert. “Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind.” In Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations, Robert Pippin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. Kant’s Theory of Form: An Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Posnock, Ross. Renunciation: Acts of Abandonment by Writers, Philosophers and Artists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Norman Kemp. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. “Naturalism and Skepticism in the Philosophy of Hume.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hume, ed. Russell, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Warren, Daniel. Reality and Impenetrability in Kant’s Philosophy of Nature. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. Diary of Virginia Woolf. Ed. Bell, Ann Olivier. New York: Harcourt, 1985, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. The Letters of Virginia Woolf. Ed. Nicolson, Nigel and Trautmann, Joanne. New York: Harcourt, 1982. 4 vols.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. “Modern Fiction.” In The Essays of Virginia Woolf, ed. McNeillie, Andrew. London: Hogarth, 1994, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. Orlando: A Biography. New York: Harcourt, 1993.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. The Waves. New York: Harcourt, 1959.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. The Prose Works of William Wordsworth. Ed. Owen, W. J. B. and Smyser, Jane Worthington. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. 3 vols.Google Scholar
Zhang, Dora. “Feeling with Woolf.” In Strange Likeness: Description and the Modernist Novel, Dora Zhang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Agamben, Giorgio. Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience. Trans. Liz Heron. London and New York: Verso, 1993.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. “L’Appareil formel de l’énonciation.” Langage 17 (1970), 12–18.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. “The Formal Apparatus of Enunciation.” In The Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis, ed. Angermüller, Johannes, Maingueneau, Dominique, and Wodak, Ruth. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. “Subjectivity in Language.” In Problems in General Linguistics, Émile Benveniste. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press, 1971.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. “Kant and Schiller.” In Aesthetic Ideology, ed. Warminski, Andrzej. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. “Kant’s Materialism.” In Aesthetic Ideology, ed. Warminski, Andrzej. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Heine, Heinrich. Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag, 1966.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. “Ueber den transcendentalen Idealismus.” In Werke, Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. Leipzig: Gerhard Fleischer d. Jüng., 1815, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Guyer, Paul. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Critique of Practical Reason.” In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J. and Wood, Allen, trans. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and trans. Guyer, Paul and Allen W., Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (and later Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin). Berlin: Georg Reimer (and later Walter de Gruyter), 1902.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?” In Religion and Rational Theology, ed. and trans. Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George di. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Mock, Keren. “The Need to Believe and the Archive: Interview with Julia Kristeva.” Dibur Literary Journal 3 (2016), 77–94.Google Scholar
Normand, Claudine. “Les termes de l’énonciation de Benveniste.” Histoire Épistémologie Langage 8.2 (1986), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, Naoki. Translation and Subjectivity: On “Japan” and Cultural Nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Tawada, Yoko. Das Bad/うろこもち. German trans. Peter Pörtner. Tübingen: konkursbuch, 2010.Google Scholar
Tawada, Yoko/多和田葉子. Das Bad. Trans. Peter Pörtner. Tübingen: konkursbuch, 1989.Google Scholar
Tawada, Yoko/多和田葉子. “The Bath.” Trans. Yumi Selden. In Where Europe Begins, Yoko Tawada. New York: New Directions Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Terada, Rei. “Seeing Is Reading.” In Legacies of Paul de Man, ed. Redfield, Marc. New York: Fordham, 2007.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart, Berlin, and Leipzig: Union deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft, 1892, Vol. 2.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Basterra, Gabriela. The Subject of Freedom. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Reflections. Ed. Demetz, Peter. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1978.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Selected Writings, 4 vols. Ed. Jennings, M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Über Sprache überhaupt und die Sprache der Menschen.” In Gesammelte Schriften, Benjamin, Walter. 7 Bde; 14 Teilbde. Hrsg. R. Tiedemann and H. Schweppenhäuser. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989, Bd. 2.1.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. “Architecture and Architectonics: ‘The Art of Reason’ in Kant’s Critique.” In Canon: Thematic Studies in Architecture, ed. Mäkelä, Taisto. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press, 1986, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. “Architecture in the Discourse of Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to Nietzsche.” In Nietzsche and an “Architecture of Our Minds,” ed. Wohlfarth, Irving and Kostka, Alexandre, The Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities. Issues and Debates. Los Angeles: Getty Center, 1999.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. “Architecture in Kant and Heidegger: The ‘Building’ of Critique and the ‘House of Being.’” In Recht und Frieden in Kant, Claudia Brodsky. 6 Bde. Hrsg. V. Rohden, R. Terra, G. A. de Almeida, and M. Ruffling. Berlin: de Gruyter Verlag, 2008, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. The Imposition of Form: Studies in Narrative Representation and Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. “What Are the Signs of What? A Theory of Entitlement.” Anthropological Linguistics 4.6 (1962), 1–23.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Political Thought of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Ed. White, R. J.. Oxford: Foxcroft Press, 1936.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. L’écriture et la différence. Paris: Seuil, 1967.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “The Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority.’” In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, Jacques Derrida. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Problème de la genèse dans la philosophie de Husserl. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 1990; orig. ENS diplôme thesis, 1953–1954.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Humanities.” In The Structuralist Controversy, ed. Macksey, Richard and Donato, Eugene. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Werkausgabe. 12 Bde. Hrsg. Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1974.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Hrsg. Manfred Frank. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Kant and Literature
  • Edited by Claudia Brodsky, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Kant and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 16 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071611.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Kant and Literature
  • Edited by Claudia Brodsky, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Kant and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 16 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071611.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Kant and Literature
  • Edited by Claudia Brodsky, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: Kant and Literary Studies
  • Online publication: 16 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071611.011
Available formats
×