Abaci, Uygar. 2008. “Kant’s theses on existence.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16(3): 559–93.Google Scholar

Abaci, Uygar. 2014. “Kant’s only possible argument and Chignell’s real harmony.” Kantian Review, 19(1): 1–5.Google Scholar

Adler, Hans. 1988. “Fundus animae – der Grund der Seele: Zur Gnoseologie des Dunklen in der Aufklärung.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, 62: 197–220.Google Scholar

Adler, Hans. 1990. Die Prägnanz des Dunklen: Gnoseologie, Ästhetik, Geschichtsphilosophie bei Herder. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Aertsen, Jan A. 2005. “Metaphysics as a transcendental science.” Questio, 5: 376–89.Google Scholar

Aertsen, Jan A. 2012. Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Alexander, H. G. (ed.) The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. 1982. Kant’s Theory of Mind. 2nd edition 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. 1992. “The critique of metaphysics: Kant and traditional ontology.” In: Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–79.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. Lanier. 2005. “The Wolffian paradigm and its discontents: Kant’s containment definition of analyticity in historical context.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 87: 22–74.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. Lanier. 2015. The Poverty of Conceptual Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Anselm, . 2000. Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises. Translated by Hopkins, Jasper and Richardson, Herbert. Minneapolis: Arthur J. Banning Press.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1997. The Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Vol. 1. Edited and annotated with an Introduction by Pegis, Anton C. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Arnoldt, Emil. 1892. “Characteristik von Kant’s Vorlesungen über Metaphysik und möglichst vollständiges Verzeichniss aller von ihm gehaltener oder auch nur angekündigter Vorlesungen.” Altpreussische Monatsschrift neue Folge, 29: 400–46, 465–564.Google Scholar

Audi, Paul. 2012. “Grounding: Toward a theory of the in-virtue-of relation.” Journal of Philosophy, 109(12): 685–711.Google Scholar

Augustine, . 1998. The City of God against the Pagans. Translated by Dyson, R. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baum, Manfred. 1987. “Herder’s essay on being.” In: Herder Today. Edited by Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt. Berlin: De Gruyter, 126–37.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1757. Metaphysica. 4th edition. Halle.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1773. Acroasis logica. Edited by Tollnero, Joanne Gottlieb. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1964. Reflections on Aesthetics. Translated by Aschenbrenner, Karl and Holther, H.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 1983. Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poem pertinentibus. Edited by Heinz Paetzold. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2007. Aesthetica/Ästhetik. Translated and edited by Mirbach, Dagmar, 2 vols. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2011. Metaphysica/Metaphysik. Translated and edited by Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2013. Metaphysics. A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials. Translated and edited with an Introduction by Courtney, D. Fugate and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White. 1969. Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White. 1978. “Lambert and Hume on Kant’s Development.” In: Beck, Lewis White. Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven: Yale University Press, 101–10.Google Scholar

Birken-Bertsch, Hanno. 2006. Subreption und Dialektik bei Kant: Der Begriff des Fehlers der Erschleichung in der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Blackwell, Richard. 1961. “Christian Wolff’s doctrine of the soul.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 22: 339–54.Google Scholar

Bliss, R. and Trogdon, K. 2014. “Metaphysical Grounding.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, E. N.. URL= https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/grounding/.Google Scholar

Bock., 1846. “Was mir von dem Anfange der literarischen Laufbahn des verewigten Herder bekannt ist.” In: Herder, Emil Gottfried von (ed.) Johann Gottfried Herder’s Lebensbild. Erlangen: Bläsing, vol. 1, 133–6.Google Scholar

Boehm, Omri. 2014. Kant’s Critique of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boehm, Omri. 2016. “The principle of sufficient reason, the ontological argument and the is/ought distinction.” European Journal of Philosophy, 24(3): 556–79.Google Scholar

Bonaccini, Juan A. 2015. “Kant’s account of miracles in his Lectures on Metaphysics.” In: Kant’s Lectures/Kant’s Vorlesungen. Edited by Dörflinger, Bernd, La Rocca, Claudio, Louden, Robert and Racan de Azevedo Marques, Ubirajara. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Borowski, L. E. 1912. Darstellung des Lebens und Charakters Immanuel Kants. In: Groß, Felix (ed.) Immanuel Kant: Sein Leben in Darstellungen von Zeitgenossen/ Die Biographien von L. E. Borowski, R. B. Jachmann und A. Ch. Wasianski. Berlin: Deutsche Bibliothek, 93ff.Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard. 1994. “Rousseau und Kants ‘Ich denke.’” In: Brandt, Reinhard, and Stark, Werner (eds.) Autographen, Dokumente und Berichte. Zu Edition, Amtsgeschäften und Werk Immanuel Kants, Hamburg: Meiner, 1–18.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. 1981. Kant’s Life and Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chance, Brian A. 2018a. “Pure Understanding, the Categories, and Kant’s Critique of Wolff.” In: Moran, Kate (ed.) Freedom and Spontaneity in Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30–47.Google Scholar

Chance, Brian A. 2018b. “Wolff’s Empirical Psychology and the Structure of the Transcendental Logic.” In: Dyck, C. and Wunderlich, F. (eds.) Kant and His German Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–34.Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew. 2009. “Kant, modality, and the most real being.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 91(2): 157–92.Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew. 2014. “Can Kantian laws be broken?” Res Philosophica, 91: 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chignell, Andrew. Forthcoming. “Leibniz and Kant on miracles: Rationalism, religion and the laws.” In: Look, Brandon (ed.) Leibniz and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clewis, Robert R. (ed.) 2015. Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cohen, Alix. 2012. “Kant’s ‘curious catalogue of human frailties’ and the great portrait of nature.” In: Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 144–62.Google Scholar

Corr, Charles. 1972. “Christian Wolff’s treatment of scientific discovery.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 10: 323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correia, Fabrice, and Schnieder, Benjamin (eds.) 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Correia, Fabrice. 2014. “Logical grounds.” The Review of Symbolic Logic, 7: 31–59.Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August. 1744. Ausführliche Abhandlung von dem rechten Gebrauche und der Einschränkung des sogenannten Satzes vom zureichenden oder besser determinierenden Grunde. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August. 1745. Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten. Reprinted in: Crusius, Christian August. 1964. Die philosophischen Hauptwerke. Edited by Tonelli, Giorgio. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, vol. 2.Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August. 1747 . Weg zur Gewißheit und Zuverläßigkeit der menschlichen Erkenntniß. Reprinted in: Crusius, Christian August. 1964. Die philosophischen Hauptwerke. Edited by Tonelli, Giorgio. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, vol. 3.Google Scholar

Crusius, Christian August. 1766. Entwurf der notwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten, wiefern sie den Zufälligen entgegen gesetzet werden. Leipzig.Google Scholar

De Boer, Karin, 2011. “Transformations of transcendental philosophy: Wolff, Kant, and Hegel.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 32 (1–2): 50–79.Google Scholar

De Boer, Karin, 2018. “Kant’s account of sensible concepts in the Inaugural Dissertation and the Critique of Pure Reason.” In: Waibel, Violetta and Ruffing, Margit (eds.) Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin: De Gruyter, 247–60.Google Scholar

Devaux, Michaël, and Lamanna, Marco. 2009. “The rise and early history of the term ontology (1606–1730).” Questio 9: 173–208.Google Scholar

Dobbek, Wilhelm. 1961. Herders Jugendzeit in Mohrungen und Königsberg 1744–1764. Würzburg: Holzner.Google Scholar

Dörflinger, Bernd, et al. (eds.) 2015. Kant’s Lectures/Kants Vorlesungen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dyck, Corey. 2014. Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dyck, Corey. 2015. “Beyond the Parologisms: The proofs of immortality in the Lectures on Metaphysics.” In: Clewis, Robert R. (ed.) Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter, 115–34.Google Scholar

Dyck, Corey. 2016. “Spontaneity before the Critical turn: The spontaneity of the mind in Crusius, the Pre-Critical Kant, and Tetens.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54: 625–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eberhard, Johann August, and Kant, Immanuel. 2016. Preparation for Natural Theology: With Kant’s Notes and the Danzig Rational Theology Transcript. Edited and translated with an introduction by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Ficara, Elena. 2006. Die Ontologie in der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit. 1994. “Essence and modality.” Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 1–16.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit. 2001. “The question of realism.” Philosophers’ Imprint, 1(2): 1–30.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit. 2012. “Guide to ground.” In: Fabrice, Correia and Schnieder, Benjamin (eds.) 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–80.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. 2013. Kant’s Construction of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fugate, Courtney D. 2014a. “Alexander Baumgarten on the principle of sufficient reason.” Philosophica – Revista Do Departamento de Filosofia da Faculdade de Letras de Lisboa, 44: 127–47.Google Scholar

Fugate, Courtney D. 2014b. The Teleology of Reason: A Study of the Structure of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fugate, Courtney. 2015. “The unity of metaphysics in Kant’s lectures.” In: Clewis, Robert R. (ed.) Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter, 64–87.Google Scholar

Fugate, Courtney. 2019. “Kant’s world concept of philosophy and cosmopolitanism.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fugate, Courtney and Hymers, John (eds.) 2018. Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gaier, Ulrich. 1985. “Commentary.” In: Gaier, Ulrich (ed.) Johann Gottfried Herder: Frühe Schriften 1764–1772. Frankfurt: Deutsche Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar

Gawlick, Günter. 1983. “Christian Wolff und der Deismus.” In: Schneiders, Werner (ed.). Christian Wolff: 1679–1754. Interpretationen zu seiner Philosophie und deren Wirkung. Studien zum achtzehnten Jahrhundert, vol. 4. Hamburg: Meiner, 139–47.Google Scholar

Goclenius, Rudolph. 1613. Lexicon philosophicum. Frankfurt. Reprint 1964. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Gottsched, Johann Christoph. 1733. Erste Gründe der Gesamten Weltweisheit. Leipzig: Breitkopfen.Google Scholar

Grier, Michelle. 2001. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gulyga, Arsenji. 1987. Immanuel Kant: His Life and Thought. Boston: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul. 1991. “Mendelssohn and Kant: One source of the critical philosophy.” Philosophical Topic, 19: 119–52.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Original publication 1979: Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. 2003. “Beauty, freedom and morality: Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology and the development of his aesthetic theory.” In: Jacobs, Brian, and Kain, Patrick (eds.) Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135–63. Reprinted in:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul. 2018. “Baumgarten, Kant, and the refutation of idealism.” In: Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hahmann, A. Forthcoming. Crusius’ Critique of Wolffian Ontology and Cosmology. In: Hahmann, A. and Grunert, F. (eds.) Christian August Crusius (1715–1775). Philosophy between Reason and Revelation. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haym, Rudolf. 1954. Herder. 2 vols. Berlin: Aufbau.Google Scholar

Heimsoeth, H. 1966–1971. Transzendentale Dialektik. Ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. 4 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion. 1994. Sensualistischer Idealismus: Untersuchungen zur Erkenntnistheorie des jungen Herder. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. 1967. “Kants Denken 1762/3: Über den Ursprung der Unterscheidung analytischer und synthetischer Urteile.” In: Heimsoeth, Heinz, Henrich, Dieter and Tonelli, Giorgio (eds.) Studien zu Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Hildesheim: Olms, 9–38.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . 1877–1913. Sämtliche Werke. 33 vols. Edited by Suphan, Bernhard. Berlin: Weidmann. Reprinted 1994. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . 1985. “Versuch über das Sein.” In: Gaier, Ulrich (ed.) Johann Gottfried Herder: Frühe Schriften 1764–1772. Frankfurt: Deutsche Klassiker Verlag, 9–21.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . 1977–1996. Briefe: Gesamtausgabe. 10 vols. Edited by Dobbek, Wilhelm and Arnold, Günter. Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . 2002. “On the cognition and the sensation of the human soul.” In: Herder, Johann Gottfried von, . Herder: Philosophical Writings. Edited and translated by Forster, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–243.Google Scholar

Herz, Markus. 1773. “Ernst Platners Anthropologie für Ärzte und Weltweise. Leipzig, 1772.” Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek, 20: 25–51.Google Scholar

Heßbruggen-Walter, Stefan. 2014. “Putting our soul in place.” Kant Yearbook 6, 23–42.Google Scholar

Hettche, Matt. 2016. “Christian Wolff.” In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/wolff-christian/>..>Google Scholar

Hinske, Norbert. 1970. Kants Weg zur Transzendentalphilosophie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Hinske, Norbert. 1990. “Die tragende Grundideen der deutschen Aufkärung.” In: Ciafardone, Raffaele (ed.) Die Philosophie der deutschen Aufkärung. Stuttgart: Reclam, 407–58.Google Scholar

Hinske, Norbert. 1998. Zwischen Aufklärung und Vernunftkritik: Studien zum Kantischen Logikcorpus. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Hinske, Norbert. 2009. “Ontologie oder Analytik des Verstandes? Kants langer Abschied von der Ontologie.” Questio, 9: 303–9.Google Scholar

Hogan, Desmond. 2010. “Kant’s Copernican Turn and the Rationalist Tradition.” In: Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hollmann, Samuel Christian. 1776. Zufällige Gedanken über verschiedene wichtige Materien. Sechste und Letzte Sammlung. Frankfurt, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Honnefelder, Ludger. 2003. “Metaphysics as a discipline: From the ‘Transcendental Philosophy of the Ancients’ to Kant’s notion of transcendental philosophy.” In: Friedman, Russell and Nielsen, Lauge (eds.) The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 53–74.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. 2002. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense. Edited, with an introduction by Garrett, Aaron. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Jenkins, C. 2011. “Is metaphysical grounding irreflexive?” The Monist, 94: 267–76.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1902–. Kants gesammelte Schriften. 29 vols. Issued by the Preuβischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (vols. 1–21), the deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften (vol. 23) and the Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (vols. 24–9). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1991. Bemerkungen in den “Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen. Edited by Rischmüller, Marie. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770. Translated and edited by Walford, Daniel and Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Religion and Rational Theology. Translated and edited by Wood, Allen W and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Lectures on Metaphysics. Edited by Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve. Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood., Allen Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kanzian, Christian, 1993. “Kant und Crusius 1763.” Kant-Studien, 84(4): 399–407.Google Scholar

Kawamura, Katsutoshi. 1996. Spontaneität und Willkür. Der Freiheitsbegriff in Kants Antinomielehre und seine historischen Wurzeln. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Kim, Chan Won. 2004 . Der Begriff der Welt bei Wolff, Baumgarten, Crusius und Kant. Studien zur Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, Band 10. Edited by Hinske, Norbert. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Klemme, Heiner F. 1996. Kants Philosophie des Subjekts. Systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Selbstbewußtsein und Selbsterkenntnis. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Klemme, Heiner F. 1999. “Kants Wende zum Ich. Zum Einfluß von Herz und Mendelssohn auf die Entwicklung der kritischen Subjekttheorie.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 53: 507–29.Google Scholar

Klemme, Heiner F. 2018. “How is moral obligation possible? Kant’s principle of autonomy in historical context.” In: Bacin, Stefano and Sensen, Oliver (eds.) The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Korcz, Keith. 2015. “The epistemic basing relation.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, E. N.. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/basing-epistemic/.Google Scholar

Krouglov, Alexei N. 2004. “Der Begriff transzendental bei J.N. Tetens. Historischer Kontext und Hintergründe.” Aufklärung. Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte, 16: 35–75.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. 1987. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Lamanna, Marco. 2014. “Ontology between Goclenius and Suárez.” In: Novák, Lukáš (ed.) Suárez’s Metaphysics in Its Historical and Systematic Context. Berlin: De Gruyter, 135–51.Google Scholar

Laywine, Alison. 1993, Kant’s Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Gerhard. 1967. “Kants Entwicklung im Spiegel der Vorlesungen.” In: Heimsoeth, Heinz, Henrich, Dieter and Tonelli, Giorgio (eds.) Studien zu Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Hildesheim: Olms, 144–58.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1990. Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and The Origin of Evil. Edited with an introduction by Farrer, Austin and translated by Huggard, E. M.. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar

Litland, Jon. 2013. “On Some counterexamples to the transitivity of grounding.” Essays in Philosophy, 14: 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locke, John. 1998. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Woolhouse, Roger. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. 2001. “Kant’s deconstruction of the principle of sufficient reason.” The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 9(1): 67–87.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. 2007. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Translated by Simek, Nicole J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lorini, Gualtiero, 2013. “Die Rolle der Vorlesungen über Metaphysik in Kants stillem Jahrzehnt (1770–1781): Der Begriff Ontologie.” Estudos Kantianos, 1: 105–24.Google Scholar

Lorini, Gualtiero, 2015. “The contribution of Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics to a better comprehension of the architectonic.” In: Dörflinger, Bernd, et al. (eds.) Kant’s Lectures/Kants Vorlesungen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 233–46.Google Scholar

Lorini, Gualtiero. 2015. “Kant’s metaphor by analogy between ontology and transcendental philosophy.” In: Kauark-Leite, Patricia, et al. (eds.) Kant and the Metaphors of Reason. Hildesheim: Olms, 71–85.Google Scholar

Louden, Robert. 2000. Kant’s Impure Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Louden, Robert. 2012. “National character via the beautiful and sublime?” In: Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 198–216.Google Scholar

Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1752. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar

Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1755. Metaphysik. Vol. 1. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar

Melamedoff, Damian. (Manuscript). “Ground in Kant’s New Elucidation.”Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. 1971–. Gesammelte Schriften: Jubiläumsausgabe. 35 vols. Edited by Altmann, Alexander, Brocke, Michael, Engel, Eva J. and Krochmalnik, Daniel. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. 2012. Morning Hours. In: Mendelssohn, Moses. Last Works. Translated by Rosenstock, Bruce. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Mensch, Jennifer. 2013. Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mensch, Jennifer. 2017. “Caught between character and race: ‘Temperament’ in Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology.” Australian Feminist Law Journal, 43: 125–44.Google Scholar

Mensch, Jennifer. 2018. “Kant and the skull collectors: German anthropology from Blumenbach to Kant.” In: Dyck, Corey and Wunderlich, Falk (eds.) Kant and his German Contemporaries, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 192–210.Google Scholar

Milz, Bernhard. 2014. “Kants Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs in entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Perspektive.” In: Puls, Heiko von (ed.) Kants Rechtfertigung des Sittengesetzes in Grundlegung III. Deduktion oder Faktum? Berlin: De Gruyter, 133–65.Google Scholar

Moledo, Fernando. 2016. “Die neue Auffassung der Metaphysik als reine Philosophie in der Inauguraldissertation und ihre propädeutische Bedeutung im Rahmen der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” Kant-Studien, 107(3): 485–95.Google Scholar

Mora, José Ferrater. 1963. “On the early history of ‘ontology’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 24: 36–47.Google Scholar

Naragon, Steve. 2000. “The metaphysics lectures in the Academy Edition of Kants Gesammelte Schriften.” In: Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner (eds.) Zustand und Zukunft der Akademie-Ausgabe von Kants Gesammelten Schriften. Berlin: de Gruyter, 189–215.Google Scholar

Naragon, Steve. 2015. “Reading Kant in Herder’s lecture notes.” In: Clewis, Robert R. Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: De Gruyter, 37–62.Google Scholar

Naragon, Steve. 2018. Kant in the Classroom. URL = <http://users.manchester.edu/kant>..>Google Scholar

Parsons, Charles. 1992. “The transcendental aesthetic.” In: Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perin, Adriano. 2015. “The proof of the principle of sufficient reason: Wolff, Crusius and the Early Kant on the search for a foundation of metaphysics.” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 71(2/3): 515–29.Google Scholar

Platner, Ernst. 2000. Anthropologie für Ärzte und Weltweise. Originally published 1772. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Raven, Michael J. 2012. “In defence of ground.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90: 687–701.Google Scholar

Raven, Michael. J. 2015. “Ground.” Philosophy Compass, 10(5): 322–33.Google Scholar

Richards, Robert J. 1980. “Christian Wolff’s prolegomena to empirical and rational psychology: Translation and commentary.” American Philosophical Society, 124: 22–239.Google Scholar

Rosen, Gideon. 2010. “Metaphysical dependence: Grounding and reduction.” In: Hale, Bob, and Hoffman, Aviv (eds.) Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–36.Google Scholar

Rosenkoetter, Timothy. 2010. “Absolute positing, the Frege anticipation thesis, and Kant’s definitions of judgment.” European Journal of Philosophy, 18(4): 539–66.Google Scholar

Sallis, John. 2005. The Gathering of Reason. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Jonathan. 2009. “On what grounds what.” In: Chalmers, David, Manley, David and Wasserman, Ryan (eds.) Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–83.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Jonathan. 2012. “Grounding, transitivity, and contrastivity.” In: Correia, Fabrice, and Schnieder, Benjamin (eds.) 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 122–38.Google Scholar

Schönecker, Dieter. 2005. Kants Begriff transzendentaler und praktischer Freiheit. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Schwaiger, Clemens. 1999. Kategorische und andere Imperative. Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Schwaiger, Clemens. 2011. Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten – Ein Intellektuelles Porträt. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Scotus, John Duns. 1997. Questions on the Metaphysics of Aristotle by John Duns Scotus, Volume I: Books One–Five. Translated by Etzkorn, Girard J and Wolter, Allan B, OFM. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar

Shell, Susan and Velkley, Richard (eds.) 2012. Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smit, Houston. 2009. “Kant on a priority and the spontaneity of cognition.” In: Newlands, Samuel, and Jorgenson, Larry (eds.) Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 188–251.Google Scholar

Stang, Nicholas. 2016. Kant’s Modal Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner. 1984. “Kritische Fragen und Anmerkungen zu einem neuen Band der Akademie-Ausgabe von Kant’s Vorlesungen.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 38: 292–310.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner. 1985. “Antwort auf die Erwiderung ‘Zum Streit um die Akademie-Ausgabe Kants’ von G. Lehmann.” Zeitschrift für philosophisches Forschung, 39: 630–3.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner. 1995. “Kant als akademischer Lehrer.” In: Königsberg und Riga. Edited by Ischreyt, Heinz. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 51–68.Google Scholar

Sturm, Thomas. 2009. Kant und die Wissenschaften vom Menschen. Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar

Suphan, Bernhard. 1872. “Herder als Schüler Kants.” Zeitschrift für deutsche Philosophie, 4: 225–37.Google Scholar

Tahko, Tuomas. 2013. “Truth-grounding and transitivity.” Thought, 2: 332–40.Google Scholar

Tetens, Johann Nikolaus. 1775. Über die allgemeine spekulativische Philosophie. Bützow:, Berger und Boednerschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Tetens, Johann Nikolaus. 1775. Über die allgemeine spekulativische Philosophie. Bützow:, Berger und Boednerschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Tetens, Johann Nikolaus. 1777. Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung. 2 vols. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erben und Reich.Google Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio. 1966. “Die Anfänge von Kants Kritik der Kausalbeziehungen und ihre Voraussetzungen im 18. Jahrhundert.” Kant-Studien, 57: 417–60.Google Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio. 1976. “Analysis and synthesis in XVIIIth century philosophy prior to Kant.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 20: 178–213.Google Scholar

Uebele, Wilhelm. 1911. Johann Nicolaus Tetens nach seiner Gesamtentwicklung betrachtet, mit besonderer Berücksichtingung des Verhältnisses zu Kant. Berlin: Reuther and Reichard.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. 1995. “Kant’s theory of physical influx.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 77: 286–324.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. 2001. “Kant on rational cosmology.” In: Watkins, Eric (ed.) Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 70–91.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. 2004. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. 2006. “On the necessity and nature of simples: Leibniz, Wolff and Baumgarten, and the Pre-Critical Kant.” In: Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven (eds.) Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy. Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 261–314.Google Scholar

Westlinning, Margot. 1995. “Der junge Herder in Königsberg.” In: Ischreyt, Heinz (ed.) Königsberg und Riga. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 69–86.Google Scholar

Wilson, Holly. 2006. Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology: Its Origin, Meaning, and Critical Significance. Albany: SUNY University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Jessica M. 2014. “No work for a theory of grounding.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 57(5–6): 535–79.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1710. Anfangs-Gründe aller mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 1. Halle: Rengerische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1719. Vernunftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt, und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1728. Philosophia rationalis sive logica. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1736. Philosophia prima sive ontologia. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1737a. Cosmologia generalis. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1737b. Theologia naturalis. Vol. 2. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1740. Philosophia rationalis sive logica. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1741. Vernünfftige Gedancken von den Absichten der natürlichen Dinge. Halle: Rengerischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1744. Natürliche Gottesgelahrheit nach beweisender Lehrart abgefasset. Part 2, vol. 1. Translated by Hagen, Gottlieb Friedrich. Halle (Saale): Rengerischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1747. Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle: Rengerischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1754. Vernünfftige Gedancken von den Kräfften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkäntnis der Wahrheit. Halle: Rengerischen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1770. Logic, or Rational Thoughts on the Powers of the Human Understanding; with Their Use and Application in the Knowledge and Search of Truth. London: Printed for Hawes, Clarke, and Collins.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1936. Philosophia prima sive ontologia, methodo scientifica pertractata qua omnis cognitionis humanae principia continentur. Revised edition. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Renger.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1963. Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General. Translated by Blackwell, Richard. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 1996. Discursus praeliminaris de philosophia in genere. Einleitende Abhandlung über Philosophie im allgemeinen. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe. Edited by Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. 2005. Erste Philosophie oder Ontologie: Lateinisch-Deutsch. Translated and edited by Effertz, Dirk. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen. 1991a. “Kant’s Deism.” In: Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered. Edited by Rossi, Philip J and Wreen, Michael J. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–21.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen. 1991b. “Unsocial sociability: The anthropological basis of Kantian ethics.” Philosophical Topics, 19: 325–51.Google Scholar

Wuerth, Julian. 2010. “The paralogisms of pure reason.” In: Guyer, Paul (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210–44.Google Scholar

Wuerth, Julian. 2014. Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Young, J. Michael. 1992. “Translator’s introduction.” In: Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by Young, J. Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, xv–xxxii.Google Scholar

Zammito, John. 2002. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 127–46.Google Scholar

Zammito, John. 2017. “Herder between Reimarus and Tetens.” In Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology. Edited by Waldow, Anik and Nigel, DeSouza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zammito, John. 2018. The Gestation of German Biology: Philosophy and Physiology from Stahl to Schelling. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Zelanzy, Miroslaw, and Stark, Werner. 1987. “Zu Kryzstof Celestyn Mrongovius und seinen Kollegheften nach Kant’s Vorlesungen.” Kant-Forschungen, 1: 279–92.Google Scholar

Zöller, Günther. 2001. “‘Die Seele des Systems’: Systembegriff und Begriffssystem in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie.” In: Fulda, Hans Friedrich and Stolzenberg, Jürgen (eds.) Architektonik und System in der Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner, 54–72.Google Scholar