Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Miscellaneous frontmatter
- Frontispiece
- Introduction
- CRITICISM
- CREATIVE WRITING
- CRITICAL MISCELLANY
- Poise
- Poise by J. D. Fergusson: A Rediscovered Portrait of Katherine Mansfield?
- Patriarchal Pink: Gender Signification in Katherine Mansfield's ‘The Little Governess’
- Apples and Pears: Symbolism and Influence in Daphne du Maurier's ‘The Apple Tree’ and Katherine Mansfield's ‘Bliss’
- REVIEW ESSAY
- Notes on Contributors
- Index
- Join the Katherine Mansfield Society
Apples and Pears: Symbolism and Influence in Daphne du Maurier's ‘The Apple Tree’ and Katherine Mansfield's ‘Bliss’
from CRITICAL MISCELLANY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Miscellaneous frontmatter
- Frontispiece
- Introduction
- CRITICISM
- CREATIVE WRITING
- CRITICAL MISCELLANY
- Poise
- Poise by J. D. Fergusson: A Rediscovered Portrait of Katherine Mansfield?
- Patriarchal Pink: Gender Signification in Katherine Mansfield's ‘The Little Governess’
- Apples and Pears: Symbolism and Influence in Daphne du Maurier's ‘The Apple Tree’ and Katherine Mansfield's ‘Bliss’
- REVIEW ESSAY
- Notes on Contributors
- Index
- Join the Katherine Mansfield Society
Summary
We discovered the cimetière on a hill. The gardien told us that she was first buried in the Fosse commune – the common grave for the poor – but her beau-frère had her moved and placed where she is now, with just a plain slab stone in memory. Her husband, Middleton Murry, had never been near it. I bought some flowers and put them on her grave. I wish I had the money to pay for it to be kept in order. I can't forget it.
This essay focuses on a comparative analysis of the short stories ‘Bliss’ (1918) by Katherine Mansfield and ‘The Apple Tree’ (1952) by Daphne du Maurier, two stories that illustrate key literary parallels: the use of dramatic irony, ‘organic unity’ and liminal spaces. In recent years, literary criticism has repositioned Mansfield as a vital contributor to the development of literary modernism. Her influence upon other writers is still being explored and the short stories of du Maurier, herself erroneously regarded as merely a popular novelist, indicate both Mansfield and modernism as primary influences. Clare Drewery argues that there are ‘few comparative discussions of modernist women's short stories’; this study attempts to redress such an imbalance by showing how a close reading of Mansfield and du Maurier's stories illuminates the current debate on genre and gender within shorter fiction.
Mansfield died in 1923, when du Maurier was only sixteen, but she was a significant influence on du Maurier, who commented that ‘[s]urely Katherine Mansfield would not have been so easily discouraged?’, when trying to overcome the difficulties of living as a writer. In this we see that du Maurier is not only taking literary inspiration from Mansfield, but also using her as a model for living, as well as for the development of her fiction. In a letter from du Maurier to her governess, Maud Waddell (known in the du Maurier family as Tod), the twenty-one- year-old fledgling writer comments:
I met someone who used to know Katherine Mansfield very well, and apparently K.M. used to live at Hampstead at one time and told this friend how terribly interested she was in the du Maurier children and that she longed to talk to us, and used to watch us for hours playing about on the heath. […]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Katherine Mansfield and Psychology , pp. 172 - 186Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2016