Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: April 2017

7 - Flexible Physical Layer Design

from Part II - Physical Layer Communication Techniques
Export citation
Summary

Introduction

The role of software in mobile communication systems has increased over time. For the upcoming fifth generation (5G) mobile networks, the concept of software-defined networking (SDN) can ease network management by enabling anything as a service. Software-defined radio (SDR) enables radio virtualization, where several radio components are implemented in software. Cognitive radio (CR) goes one step further by using a software-based decision cycle to self-adapt the SDR parameters and consequently optimize the use of communication resources. This proposal leads to the possibility of having real-time communication functionalities at virtual machines in cloud computing data centers, instead of deploying specialized hardware. Network functions virtualization (NFV) claims to provide cloud-based virtualization of network functionalities. The perspective is that all these software-based concepts should converge while 5G networks are being designed. A new breakthrough will be achieved when all these software paradigms are applied to the physical layer (PHY), where its functionalities are defined and controlled by software as well.

A flexible PHY design is particularly beneficial considering the diverse applications proposed for 5G [1]. In fact, these applications typically have conflicting design objectives and face extreme requirements. Broadband communication will play an important role in, for instance, offering video streaming services with high resolution for TV and supporting high-density multimedia such as 4K and 3D videos in smartphones. Data rates up to 10 gigabits per second (Gbps) are therefore being targeted in 5G. The Tactile Internet [2] enables one to control virtual or real objects via wireless links with haptic feedback. This implies that the end-to-end latency constraint in 5G must be dropped by at least one order of magnitude compared with current fourth generation (4G) technologies. The Internet of Things (IoT) is aimed at connecting a massive amount of devices. Wireless sensor networks need to provide in-service monitoring at low cost and with a long battery life. Smart vehicles improve safety and actively avoid accidents by exchanging their driving status, such as position, breaking, acceleration, and speed, with surrounding vehicles and infrastructure via challenging doubly dispersive channels. Overall, this demands asynchronous multiple access, ultra-low latency, and ultra-high reliability.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Key Technologies for 5G Wireless Systems
  • Online ISBN: 9781316771655
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771655
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×
[1] G., Wunder, P., Jung, M., Kasparick, T., Wild, F., Schaich, Y., Chen, S., Brink, I., Gaspar, N., Michailow, A., Festag, L., Mendes, N., Cassiau, D., Ktenas, M., Dryjanski, S., Pietrzyk, B., Eged, P., Vago, and F., Wiedmann, “5GNOW: Non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 97–105, Feb. 2014.
[2] G., Fettweis, “The Tactile Internet: Applications and challenges,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 64–70, Mar. 2014.
[3] N., Tadayon and S., Aissa, “Modeling and analysis of cognitive radio based IEEE 802.22 wireless regional area networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 4363–4375, Sep. 2013.
[4] B., Hirosaki, “An orthogonally multiplexed QAM system using the discrete Fourier transform,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 982–989, Jul. 1981.
[5] G., Cariolaro and F. C., Vagliani, “An OFDM scheme with a half complexity,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1586–1599, Dec. 1995.
[6] E., Dahlman, S., Parkvall, and J., Skold, 4G: LTE/LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband, Elsevier Academic, 2011.
[7] X., Zhang, M., Jia, L., Chen, J., Ma, and J., Qiu, “Filtered-OFDM-enabler for flexible waveform in the 5th generation cellular networks,” in Proc. of IEEE Global Communnications Conf. (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2015.
[8] T., Wild, F., Schaich, and Y., Chen, “5G air interface design based on universal filtered (UF-)OFDM,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conf. on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Aug. 2014.
[9] M., Bellanger et al., “FBMC physical layer: A primer,” PHYDYAS project, Jan. 2010. Available at www.ict-phydyas.org/teamspace/internal-folder/FBMC-Primer_ 06-2010.pdf.
[10] N., Michailow, M., Matthé, I., Gaspar, A., Caldevilla, L., Mendes, A., Festag, and G., Fettweis, “Generalized frequency division multiplexing for 5th generation cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 3045–3061, Sep. 2014.
[11] I., Gaspar, L., Mendes, M., Matthé, N., Michailow, A., Festag, and G., Fettweis, “LTE-compatible 5G PHY based on generalized frequency division multiplexing,” in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communications Systems (ISWCS), Aug. 2014.
[12] D., Panaitopol, R., Datta, and G., Fettweis, “Cyclostationary detection of cognitive radio systems using GFDM modulation,” in Proc. of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. (WCNC), Apr. 2012.
[13] R., Datta, D., Panaitopol, and G., Fettweis, “Cyclostationary detection of 5G GFDM waveform in cognitive radio transmission,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conf. on Ultra-Wide Band (ICUWB), Sep. 2014.
[14] T., Kadur, I., Gaspar, N., Michailow, and G., Fettweis, “Non-data aided frequency synchronization exploiting ICI in non-orthogonal systems,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC-Fall), Sep. 2014.
[15] I., Gaspar, M., Matthé, N., Michailow, L. L., Mendes, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “Frequency-shift offset-QAM for GFDM,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1454–1457, Aug. 2015.
[16] M., Matthé and G., Fettweis, “Conjugate root offset-QAM for orthogonal multicarrier transmission,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., vol. 2016, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Apr. 2016.
[17] J. B., Anderson, F., Rusek, and V., Wall, “Faster-than-Nyquist signaling,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 1817–1830, Aug. 2013.
[18] I., Kanaras, A., Chorti, M. R. D., Rodrigues, and I., Darwazeh, “Spectrally efficient FDM signals: Bandwidth gain at the expense of receiver complexity,” in Proc. of IEEE International Conf. on Communications (ICC), Jun. 2009.
[19] I., Gaspar, N., Michailow, A., Navarro, E., Ohlmer, S., Krone, and G., Fettweis, “Low complexity GFDM receiver based on sparse frequency domain processing,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC-Spring), Jun. 2013.
[20] M., Danneberg, N., Michailow, I., Gaspar, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “Flexible GFDM implementation in FPGA with support to run-time reconfiguration,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC-Fall), Sep. 2015.
[21] H., Meyr, M., Moeneclaey, and S., Fechtel, Digital Communication Receivers: Synchronization, Channel Estimation, and Signal Processing, John Wiley, 1997.
[22] T. D., Chiueh and P. Y., Tsai, OFDM Baseband Receiver Design for Wireless Communications, Wiley, 2008.
[23] J. J., van de Beek, M., Sandell, and P. O., Borjesson, “ML estimation of time and frequency offset in OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1800–1805, Jul. 1997.
[24] T. M., Schmidl and D. C., Cox, “Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1613–1621, Dec. 1997.
[25] H., Minn, V. K., Bhargava, and K. B., Letaief, “A robust timing and frequency synchronization for OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 822–839, Jul. 2003.
[26] A. B., Awoseyila, C., Kasparis, and B. G., Evans, “Improved preamble-aided timing estimation for OFDM systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 825–827, Nov. 2008.
[27] I. S., Gaspar, L. L., Mendes, N., Michailow, and G., Fettweis, “A synchronization technique for generalized frequency division multiplexing,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., vol. 2014, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2014.
[28] I., Gaspar and G., Fettweis, “An embedded midamble synchronization approach for generalized frequency division multiplexing,” in Proc. of IEEE Global Communications Conf. (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2015.
[29] M. C., Necker and G. L., Stuber, “Totally blind channel estimation for OFDM on fast varying mobile radio channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1514–1525, Sep. 2004.
[30] M., Danneberg, N., Michailow, I., Gaspar, M., Matthé, D., Zhang, L. L., Mendes, and G., Fettweis, “Implementation of a 2 by 2 MIMO-GFDM transceiver for robust 5G networks,” in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communications Systems (ISWCS), Aug. 2015.
[31] A., Aghamohammadi, H., Meyr, and G., Ascheid, “Adaptive synchronization and channel parameter estimation using an extended Kalman filter,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1212–1219, Nov. 1989.
[32] D., Kong, D., Qu, and T., Jiang, “Time domain channel estimation for OQAM-OFDM systems: Algorithms and performance bounds,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 322–330, Jan. 2014.
[33] U., Vilaipornsawai and M., Jia, “Scattered-pilot channel estimation for GFDM,” in Proc. of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. (WCNC), Apr. 2014.
[34] S., Ehsanfar, M., Matthé, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “A study of pilot-aided channel estimation in MIMO-GFDM systems,” in Proc. of IEEE Workshop on Smart Antennas (WSA), Mar. 2016.
[35] S., Yang and L., Hanzo, “Fifty years of MIMO detection: The road to large-scale MIMOs,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1941–1988, Fourth Quarter 2015.
[36] L., Lu, G. Y., Li, A. L., Swindlehurst, A., Ashikhmin, and R., Zhang, “An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits and challenges,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 742–758, Oct. 2014.
[37] M., Matthé, L. L., Mendes, N., Michailow, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “Widely linear estimation for space-time-coded GFDM in low-latency applications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 4501–4509, Nov. 2015.
[38] M., Matthé, I., Gaspar, D., Zhang, and G., Fettweis, “Short paper: Near-ML detection for MIMO-GFDM,” in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC-Fall), Sep. 2015.
[39] D., Zhang, M., Matthé, L. L., Mendes, and G., Fettweis, “A Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for near-optimum detection of MIMO-GFDM signals,” in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Aug. 2015.
[40] D., Zhang, L. L., Mendes, M., Matthé, I. S., Gaspar, N., Michailow, and G. P., Fettweis, “Expectation propagation for near-optimum detection of MIMO-GFDM signals,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1045–1062, Feb. 2016.
Cancel
Confirm
×