Language and Cognition

doi:10.1017/9781108643719.008

6 - Language and Cognition

from Part One - Factors Influencing Language Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2022

Sabine Weinert

Edited by

James Law ,

Sheena Reilly and

Cristina McKean

Show author details

James Law: Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Sheena Reilly: Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Cristina McKean: Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The development of language and cognition is key to human development. Language is an important means to communicate and code information; it is relevant to knowledge and concept acquisition, to memory performance and development, to problem solving, learning and self-regulation. At the same time, language development draws on cognitive and socio-cognitive abilities. Analysing the developmental interrelations between language and cognition is relevant for a better understanding of developmental trajectories in typical development and developmental disorders as well as for the promotion of child development. Contrary to some overarching theories, it is widely documented that developmental profiles can be quite heterogeneous: the developmental tasks the child is facing in the various domains of development, the trajectories, and phenomena are specific to the respective developmental domain or even subdomain. Yet there are significant and dynamic interrelationships between the acquisition of language structures, meanings, and use and various cognitive abilities and their development. This chapter introduces the reader to a variety of dynamic interrelationships between the acquisition of language and various facets of cognitive and sociocognitive development (e.g., information processing, learning and memory; conceptual development; development of metacognition, theory of mind and self-regulation).

Keywords

language development cognitive development working memory conceptual development metacognition self-regulation theory of mind

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Language Development
Individual Differences in a Social Context
, pp. 122 - 143

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643719.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, A. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Phonological working memory and speech production in preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 403–414.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2007). Nonword repetition in specific language impairment: More than a phonological short-term memory deficit. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 919–924.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1311–1320.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 90–197). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baillargeon, R., & Carey, S. (2012). Core cognition and beyond: The acquisition of physical and numerical knowledge. In Pauen, S. (Ed.), Early childhood development and later outcome (pp. 33–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 131–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bates, E. (1994). Modularity, domain specificity and the development of language. Discussions in neuroscience, 10, 136–149.Google Scholar

Bivens, J. A., & Berk, L. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the development of elementary school children’s private speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 443–463.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In Day, J. D. & Borkowski, J. G. (Eds.), Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practices (pp. 81–132). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1976). Reference in memorial tribute to Eric Lenneberg. Cognition, 4, 125–153.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRef Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.Google Scholar

de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117, 1858–1878.Google Scholar

Dorn, K., Weinert, S., & Falck-Ytter, T. (2018). Watch and listen: A cross-cultural study of audio-visual-matching behavior in 4.5-month-old infants in German and Swedish talking faces. Infant Behavior and Development, 52, 121–129.Google Scholar

Ebert, S. (2011). Was Kinder über die mentale Welt wissen – Die Entwicklung von deklarativem Metagedächtnis aus der Sicht der ‘Theory of Mind’. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar

Ebert, S. (2015). Longitudinal relations between theory of mind and metacognition and the impact of language. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 559–586.Google Scholar

Ebert, S., Lockl, K., Weinert, S., Anders, Y., Kluczniok, K., & Rossbach, H.-G. (2013). Internal and external influences on vocabulary development in preschool children. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 24, 138–154.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71–99.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L., Bates, E., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: Connectionism in a developmental framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Furth, H. G. (1966). Thinking without language: Psychological implications of deafness. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory and Cognition, 23, 83–94.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336–360.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gathercole, V. C. M., & Min, H. (1997). Word meaning biases or language-specific effects? Evidence from English, Spanish and Korean. First Language, 17, 31–56.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Emslie, H., & Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Phonological memory and vocabulary development during early school years: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 28, 887–898.Google Scholar

Gopnik, A., Choi, S., & Baumberger, T. (1996). Cross-linguistic differences in early semantic and cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 11, 197–227.Google Scholar

Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grosse Wiesmann, C., Friederici, A. D., Singer, T., & Steinbeis, N. (2017). Implicit and explicit false belief development in preschool children. Developmental Science, 20, e12445.Google Scholar

Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S., Schaafstal, A. M., & Heffernan, T. M. (1991). Speech, ‘inner speech’, and the development of short-term memory: Effects of picture-labeling on recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 220–234.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2015). An alternative to domain-general or domain-specific frameworks for theorizing about human evolution and ontogenesis. Neuroscience, 19, 91–104.Google Scholar

Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Leonard, L. B. (1998). Language, speech, and communication. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In Hirschfeld, L. A. & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119–148). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74, 1130–1144.Google Scholar

Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children. Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Maurer, D., & Werker, J. F. (2014). Perceptual narrowing during infancy: A comparison of language and faces. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 154–178.Google Scholar

Morris, C. A., Lenhoff, H. M., & Wang, P. P. (Eds.). (2006). Williams-Beuren Syndrome. Research, evaluation, and treatment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Neubauer, C. (2009). Funktionale Relevanz und Mikrogenese selbstbezogener Sprache im Vorschulalter. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar

Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28.Google Scholar

Nilsson, K. K., & de López, K. J. (2016). Theory of mind in children with specific language impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 87, 143–153.Google Scholar

Oléron, P. (1977). Language and mental development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125–137.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 703–732). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rivera-Flores, G. W. (2015). Self-instructional cognitive training to reduce impulsive cognitive style in children with attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13, 27–46.Google Scholar

Rose, E., Lehrl, S., Ebert, S., & Weinert, S. (2018). Long-term relations between children’s language, the home literacy environment, and socioemotional development from ages 3 to 8. Early Education and Development, 29, 342–356.Google Scholar

Rose, E., Weinert, S., & Ebert, S. (2018). The roles of receptive and productive language in children’s socioemotional development. Social Development, 27, 777–792.Google Scholar

Saffran, J. R., Werker, J. F., & Werner, L. A. (2006). The infant’s auditory world: Hearing, speech, and the beginnings of language. In Damon, W. & Learner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 58–108). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Schick, B., de Villiers, P., de Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78, 376–396.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. (2015). Memory development from early childhood through emerging adulthood. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Schuth, E., Köhne, J., & Weinert, S. (2017). The influence of academic vocabulary knowledge on school performance. Learning & Instruction, 49, 157–165.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. (1985). The cross linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data; Vol. 2. Theoretical issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Smith, L. B. (2001). How domain-general processes may create domain-specific biases. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 45–70). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89–96.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2001). Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life. In Tomasello, M. & Bates, E. (Eds.), Language development (pp. 111–128). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

van der Lely, J. K. J., & Pinker, S. (2014). The biological basis of language: Insights from developmental grammatical impairments. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 586–595.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Waxman, S. R., & Leddon, E. M. (2011). Early word-learning and conceptual development. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, 2nd ed. (pp. 180–208). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Weinert, F. E. (1996). Cognitive development: Individual differences. In DeCorte, E. & Weinert, F. E. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 268–272). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Weinert, S. (1992). Deficits in acquiring language structure: The importance of using prosodic cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 545–571.Google Scholar

Weinert, S. (2000). Sprach- und Gedächtnisprobleme dysphasisch-sprachgestörter Kinder: Sind rhythmisch-prosodische Defizite eine Ursache? In Müller, K. & Aschersleben, G. (Eds.), Rhythmus. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (pp. 255–283). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar

Weinert, S. (2003). Entwicklung von Sprache und Denken. In Schneider, W. & Knopf, M. (Eds.), Entwicklung, Lehren und Lernen (pp. 93–108). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Weinert, S. (2009). Implicit and explicit modes of learning: Similarities and differences from a developmental perspective. Linguistics, 47, 241–271.Google Scholar

Weinert, S. (2010). Beziehungen zwischen Sprachentwicklung und Gedächtnisentwicklung. In Trolldenier, H.-P., Lenhard, W., & Marx, P. (Eds.), Brennpunkte der Gedächtnisforschung: Entwicklungs- und pädagogisch-psychologische Perspektiven (pp. 147–170). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Weinert, S., & Artelt, C. (2019). Measurement of skills and achievement – A critical assessment of theoretical and methodological concepts. In Becker, R. (Ed.), Research handbook on the sociology of education (pp. 106–131). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Weinert, S., Ebert, S., Lockl, K., & Kuger, S. (2012). Disparitäten im Wortschatzerwerb: Zum Einfluss des Arbeitsgedächtnisses und der Anregungsqualität in Kindergarten und Familie auf den Erwerb lexikalischen Wissens. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 40, 4–25.Google Scholar

Weismer, E. S., Evans, J., & Hesketh, L. (1999). An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1249–1260.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.