Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:40:07.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Development of the linguistic relativity hypothesis in America: Boas and Sapir

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John A. Lucy
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Although many scholars have concerned themselves with the questions of whether and how diverse languages influence thought, contemporary social science research centers on the claims of Benjamin Lee Whorf, a student of native American Indian languages. Whorf drew extensively upon the prior work of anthropologists Franz Boas and Edward Sapir in his formulation of the problem, so it will be useful to examine their contributions first. The discussion will be relatively detailed, since an understanding of Whorf's position and an evaluation of his contribution depend on a comparison with these two predecessors.

Language as the reflection of culture: Boas

Franz Boas (1858–1942) was born and educated in Germany. He later emigrated to the United States, where he was the person primarily responsible for building anthropology into a professional discipline. He made contributions to most of the subfields of anthropology, including physical anthropology, social and cultural anthropology, and linguistic anthropology. His primary concerns were to break away from racial and evolutionary conceptions of culture by arguing on the one hand for the psychic unity of mankind and on the other hand for a notion of distinct cultures and culture areas, each to be studied on its own terms. In this chapter only his work on language will be discussed, although his broader agenda shapes his argument at several points.

The linguistic analysis of experience

Boas made three arguments about the nature of language that are important for the eventual development of the view that language plays a role in shaping thought.

Type
Chapter
Information
Language Diversity and Thought
A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis
, pp. 11 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×