Skip to main content
×
×
Home
The Law of Consumer Redress in an Evolving Digital Market
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Law of Consumer Redress in an Evolving Digital Market
    • Online ISBN: 9781139940900
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139940900
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This book advances the emergence of a new sub-field of study, the law of consumer redress, which encompasses the various dispute resolution processes for consumers, their regulations, and best practices. The book argues that the institutionalisation of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) bodies are expanding their functions beyond dispute resolution, as they are increasingly providing a public service for consumers that complements, and often replaces, the role of the courts. Although the book focuses on ADR, it also analyses other redress methods, including public enforcement, court adjudication and business internal complaints systems. It proposes a more efficient rationalisation of certified redress bodies, which should be better co-ordinated and accessible through technological means. Accordingly, the book calls for greater integration amongst redress methods and offers recommendations to improve their process design to ensure that, inter alia, traders are encouraged to participate in redress schemes, settle early meritorious claims and comply with outcomes.

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union COM(2010) 573

  • Commission, Guidance on the Application of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive SWD(2016) 136

  • Commission, Impact Assessment of the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Small Claims Procedure SWD(2013) 460

  • Commission, Report on the Application of Regulation (EC) 861/2007 of the European Parliament and the Council Establishing a European Small Claims Procedure COM(2013) 795 final

  • Commission, Report on the Functioning of Regulation (EC) 2006/2004 on Cooperation between National Authorities Responsible for the Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws (CPC Regulation) COM(2014) 439 final

  • Commission Communication, ‘Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress’ COM(2013) 401

  • Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC of 4 April 2001 on the Principles for the Out-of-Court Bodies Involved in the Consensual Resolution of Consumer Disputes (OJ 2001, L109/56)

  • Commission Recommendation 98/257/EC of 30 March 1998 on the Principles Applicable to the Bodies Responsible for Out-of-Court Settlement of Consumer Disputes (OJ 1998, L115)

  • Commission Recommendation on Common Principles for Injunctive and Compensatory Collective Redress Mechanisms in the Member States Concerning Violations of Rights Granted Under Union Law (OJ 2013, L201)

  • Commission Staff Working Paper, Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document of the Proposal for a Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes and the Proposal for a Regulation on Online Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes SEC(2011) 1408 final

  • Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘A European Consumer Agenda – Boosting Confidence and Growth’ COM(2012) 225

  • Communication on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes in the Single Market COM(2011) 791

  • Decision 2007/76/EC Setting out the Details on the Cooperation (OJ L32/192)

  • Directive 84/450/EEC on Misleading Advertising (OJ L250)

  • Directive 93/13/EEC on Unfair Terms (OJ L95/29)

  • Directive 95/46/EC on Data Protection (OJ L281)

  • Directive 97/5/EC On Cross-Border Credit Transfers (OJ L43)

  • Directive 98/10/EC on the Application of Open Network Provision (ONP) to Voice Telephony and on Universal Service for Telecommunications in a Competitive Environment (OJ L101)

  • Directive 99/44/EC on Consumer Sales and Guarantee (OJ L171)

  • Directive 2000/31/EC on Electronic Commerce (OJ L178/1)

  • Directive 2002/65/EC on Distance Marketing of Financial Services (OJ L271)

  • Directive 2002/8/EC to Improve Access to Justice in Cross-Border Disputes by Establishing Minimum Common Rules Relating to Legal Aid for Such Disputes (OJ L26)

  • Directive 2002/92/EC on Insurance Mediation (OJ L009)

  • Directive 2005/29/EC Unfair Commercial Practice (OJ L149/22)

  • Directive 2006/114/EC Concerning Misleading and Comparative Advertising (OJ L376/21)

  • Directive 2007/64/EC on Payment Services in the Internal Market (OJ L319)

  • Directive 2008/6/EC with Regard to the Full Accomplishment of the Internal Market of Community Postal Services (OJ L52/3)

  • Directive 2008/48/EC on Credit Agreements For Consumers (OJ L133/66)

  • Directive 2008/52/EC on Civil and Commercial Mediation (OJ L136/3)

  • Directive 2008/122/EC on the Protection of Consumers in Respect of Certain Aspects of Timeshare (OJ L33/10)

  • Directive 2009/110/EC on Electronic Money (OJ L267/7)

  • Directive 2009/22 on Injunctions for the Protection of Consumers’ Interests (OJ L110/30)

  • Directive 2009/65/EC on Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (OJ L257/186)

  • Directive 2009/72/EC Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Electricity (OJ L211/55)

  • Directive 2009/73/EC Concerning Common Rules for the Internal Market in Natural Gas (OJ L211/94)

  • Directive 2011/83/EU on Consumer Rights (OJ L304/64)

  • Directive 2013/11/EU on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (OJ L165/63)

  • Directive 2014/104/EU on Antitrust Damages Actions (OJ L349/1)

  • Parliament Resolution on Alternative Dispute Resolution in Civil, Commercial and Family Matters (2011/2117(INI))

  • Parliament Resolution ‘Strategy for Strengthening the Rights of Vulnerable Consumers’ (2011/2272(INI))

  • Parliament Resolution ‘Towards A Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress’ (2011/2089(INI))

  • Proposal Amending the Regulation 261/2004 COM/2013/0130

  • Proposal for a Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Directive on Consumer ADR) COM(2011) 793

  • Proposal for a Directive on Certain Aspects Concerning Contracts for the Online and Other Distance Sales of Goods COM(2015) 635

  • Proposal for a Directive on Certain Aspects Concerning Contracts for the Supply of Digital Content COM(2015) 634

  • Proposal for a Regulation on a Common European Sales Law SEC(2011) 1165

  • Proposal for a Regulation on Addressing Geo-Blocking and Other Forms of Discrimination Based on Customers’ Nationality, Place of Residence or Place of Establishment Within the Internal Market COM(2016) 289

  • Proposal for a Regulation on Cooperation Between National Authorities Responsible for the Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws COM(2016) 283

  • Proposal for a Regulation on Cross-Border Parcel Delivery Services COM(2016) 285

  • Proposal for a Regulation on Online Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (Regulation on Consumer ODR) COM(2011) 794

  • Regulation (EC) 44/2001 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (OJ L12)

  • Regulation (EC) 261/2004 Complaints Related to Denied-Boarding, Delays and Cancellations (OJ L46)

  • Regulation (EC) 2006/2004 on Cooperation between National Authorities Responsible for the Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws (OJ L364)

  • Regulation (EC) 1107/2006 Concerning the Rights of Disabled Persons and Persons with Reduced Mobility when Travelling by Air (OJ L204/1)

  • Regulation (EC) 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 Establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ L1999/1)

  • Regulation (EC) 1393/2007 on the Service in the Member States of Judicial and Non-Judicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (OJ L324/79)

  • Regulation (EC) 1371/2007 on Rail Passengers’ Rights and Obligations (OJ L315/14)

  • Regulation (EC) 593/2008 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (OJ L177)

  • Regulation (EC) 1177/2010 Concerning the Rights of Passengers When Travelling by Sea and Inland Waterway (OJ L334/1)

  • Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (OJ L351/1)

  • Regulation (EU) 524/2013 on Online Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes (OJ L165/1)

  • Regulation (EU) 2015/2421 Creating a European Order For Payment Procedure (OJ 341/1)

  • (British Columbia) Civil Dispute Resolution Tribunal Act 44-2012

  • Consumer Act (Loi Hamon 423–17) of 13 February 2014

  • Aviation Sector Act 2013 (Gesetz zur Schlichtung im Luftverkehr)

  • European Convention of Human Rights 1950

  • Banking Act 262/2005

  • Investor Protection Act 262/2005

  • Regulation 206/2005

  • Regulation 28/2010

  • Regulation 130/2015

  • Regulation on the Procedure for Resolving Disputes between Communication Providers and Consumers 173/07/CONS

  • Mexico Servicio de Conciliación Previa en las Relaciones de Consumo in Act 2014

  • Civil and Commercial Mediation Act 5/2012

  • Civil Procedure Act 1/2000

  • Draft Bill on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers 2015

  • General Defence of Consumers and Users Act 1/2007

  • Reforming the Financial System Act 44/2002

  • Regulation 292/2004 Establishing a Public Trustmark for the Services of the Information Society and the Electronic Commerce

  • Regulation 231/2008 on Consumer Arbitration

  • Regulation 980/2013 on Civil and Commercial Mediation

  • Spanish Constitution 1978

  • ADR Regulations 2015

  • Arbitration Act 1996

  • Business Names (Sensitive Words and Expressions) Regulations 2014

  • Civil Procedure Rules 1999

  • Companies Act 2006

  • Consumer Credit Act 1974

  • Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008

  • Consumer Rights Act 2015

  • Cross-Border Mediation Regulations 2011/1133

  • Enterprise Act 2002

  • Estate Agents Act 1979

  • Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008

  • Sale of Goods Act 1979

  • Unfair Arbitration Agreements (Specified Amounts) Order 1999

  • Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1995 and 2000

  • UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules 1980

  • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation 2002

  • UNCITRAL Working Group III (Online Dispute Resolution) Report on the Work of Its Twenty-Second Session (Vienna, 13–17 December 2010)

  • UNCITRAL Working Group III (Online Dispute Resolution) Report on the Work of Its Twenty-Third Session (New York, 21 June–9 July 2010)

  • UNCITRAL Working Group III (Online Dispute Resolution) Report on the Work of Its Twenty-Fifth Session, ‘Online Dispute Resolution for Cross-Border Electronic Commerce Transactions: Draft Procedural Rules’ (New York, 21–15 May 2012)

  • UNCITRAL Working Group III (Online Dispute Resolution) Report on the Work of Its Twenty-Sixth Session (Vienna, 5–9 November 2012)

  • UNCITRAL Working Group III (Online Dispute Resolution) Report on the Work of Its Twenty-Seventh Session (New York, 20–24 May 2013)

  • UNCITRAL Working Group III (Online Dispute Resolution) Note by the Secretariat ‘Draft Outcome Document Reflecting Elements and Principles of an ODR Process’ (New York, 29 February–4 March 2016)

  • Federal Arbitration Act 1970

  • Communications Decency Act 1996

  • Federal Consumer Act 2004

  • Code of Federal Regulations 2015

  • Sté v. 2000 and Sté XJ 220 Ltd c M Meglio and M Renault Rev. Arb. 1997

  • Heather Moor & Edgecomb Ltd v. the United Kingdom Appl. no. 1550/09, Judgment of 14 June 2011

  • Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium Appl. 6878/75 and 7238/75, Judgment of 23 June 1981

  • Osmo Suovaniemi and others v. Finland, Appl. no. 31737/96, Judgment of 23 February 1999

  • Pfeifer and Plankl v. Autria, Appl. no. 10802/84, Judgment of 25 February 1992

  • Zumtobel v. Austria, Appl. no. 12235/86, Judgment of 21 September 1993

  • C-186/95 Landgericht Krefeld

  • C-168/05 Claro v. Centro Movil Milenium

  • C-489/07 Messner

  • C-511/08 Heinrich Heine

  • C-585/08 Peter Pammer

  • C-317/08 Rosalba Alassini and Others

  • C-40/08 Asturcom Telecomunicaciones

  • C-299/12 Green Swann

  • C-75/16 Livio Menini and Maria Antonia Rampanelli

  • Ulster Bank Investment Funds Ltd v. FSO [2006] IEHC 323

  • Molloy v. FSO [2010] IEHC 182

  • Constitutional Court Decision 272/2012

  • Allen Wilson v. Buckingham [2005] EWHC 1165 (TCC)

  • Binns v. Firstplus Financial Group Plc [2013] EWHC 2436 (QB)

  • Cable and Wireless [2002] 2 All ER (Comm) 1041

  • Fox v. Wellfair Ltd [1981] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 514

  • Halsey v. Milton EWCA Civ 576 (2004)

  • Heifer International v. Christiansen [2007] EWHC 3015

  • Jet2.com v. Huzar [2014] EWCA Civ 791

  • Mylcrist Builders Ltd v. Mrs G Buck [2008] EWHC 2172

  • Office of Fair Trade v. Abbey National plc & Others [2009] UKSC 6

  • ParkingEye Ltd (Respondent) v. Beavis (Appellant) [2015] UKSC 67

  • Picardi v. Cuniberti [2002] EWHC 2923

  • Westminster Building Company v. Beckingham [2004] BLR 508

  • AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 321 (2011)

  • Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc., 487 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E. D. Penn. 2007)

  • Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 S.Ct. 585 (1991)

  • In Re Facebook Privacy Litigation 791 F. Supp. 2d 705 (2011)

  • Zeran v. AOL, 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997)

Amazon to Sue Over 1,000 Fake Reviews’ Digital Journal (18 October 2015). Available at www.digitaljournal.com/internet/amazon-to-sue-over-1-000-fake-reviewers/article/446891
Abel, R., ‘The Contradictions of Informal Justice’ in Abel, R. (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice, vol. 1 (Academic Press, 1892)
Abernethy, S., ‘Building Large-Scale Online Dispute Resolution and Trustmark Systems’ in Katsh, E. & Choi, D. (eds.), Online Dispute Resolution: Technology as the ‘Fourth Party’ (International Conflict Resolution Centre, University of Melbourne, 2003)
ADICAE, Informe de ADICAE sobre el Anteproyecto de Ley de Resolución de Conflictos de Consumo (ADICAE, 2014)
ADICAE, Sistemas de Resolución Extrajudicial de Conflictos con los Consumidores (ADICAE, 2014)
Alberstein, M., ‘Judicial Conflict Resolution (JCR): A New Jurisprudence for an Emerging Judicial Practice’ (2015) 16 Cardozo Law J Confl Resol 886
Alleweldt, F. et al., ‘Cross-Border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union’ IMCO (June 2011) IP/A/IMCO/ST/2010-15
Anagnostaras, G., ‘The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in Context: From Legal Disparity to Legal Complexity?’ (2010) 47 CMLR 147
Anonymous authors, ‘Mandatory Mediation and Summary Jury Trial: Guidelines for Ensuring Fair and Effective Processes’ (1990) 103 Harv Law Rev 1086
Armstrong, M., ‘Interactions between Competition and Consumer Policy’ (2008) 4(1) Competition Policy Int 97147
Balboni, P., Trustmarks in E-Commerce (Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Balwin, J., ‘The Small Claims Procedure and the Consumer’ (London: Office of Fair Trading, 1995)
Banca d’Italia Eurosistema, ‘The Banking and Financial Ombudsman Annual Report’ (January 2016)
Barral-Viñals, I., ‘Consumer Complaints and Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods: Harmonisation of the European ADR System’ in Devenney, J. and Kenny, M. (eds.), The Transformation of European Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Barral Viñals, I., ‘Consumers, Online Dispute Resolution and Small Claims’ (2014) 10 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Electrônico 394
Barton, B. H., ‘The Lawyer’s Monopoly – What Goes and What Stays’ (2014) 82 Fordham Law Rev 3067
Better Business Bureau, ‘2014 Statistics: Sorted by Complaints’. Available at www.bbb.org/globalassets/local-bbbs/council-113/media/complaint-stats/2014/2014us-sorted-by-complaint.pdf
BIS, Guidance on Specific Points of Checklist for Attributes of ADR Entities (April 2014)
Blackwell, P., Satisfied Customers Tell Three Friends, Angry Customers Tell 3,000 (Tantor Media, 2008)
Black’s Law Dictionary (Thomson West, 2016)
Bordone, R., ‘Electronic Online Dispute Resolution: A System Approach – Potential, Problems, and a Proposal’ (1998) 3 Harv Negot Law Rev 175
Bradney, A. and Cownie, F., ‘Access to Justice?: The European Small Claims Procedure in the United Kingdom’ in Neuwahl, N. and Hammamoun, S. (eds.), The European Small Claims Procedure and the Philosophy of Small Change (Les Éditions Thémis, 2014) p. 118
Brand, R., ‘Analysis and Proposal for Incorporation of Substantive Principles for ODR Claims and Relief into Article 4 of the Draft Procedural Rules’ Note submitted by the Center for International Legal Education to UNCITRAL Working Group III Twenty-Fifth Session (New York, 21–25 May 2012)
British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association, Code of Conduct. Available at www.bvrla.co.uk/system/files/files/publication-order-forms/code_of_conduct_corporate_members.pdf
British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association, Response to the BIS Consultation Document on Implementing the ADR Directive and ODR Regulation (June 2014)
Bruni, A., ‘The Use and Practise of Mediation in Italy’ in Diedrich, F. (ed.), The Status Quo of Mediation in Europe and Overseas – Options for Countries in Transition (Verlag Dr Kovac, 2014)
Bucilla, J. II, ‘The Online Crossroads of Website Terms of Service Agreements and Consumer Protection: An Empirical Study of Arbitration Clauses in the Terms of Service Agreements for the Top 100 Websites Viewed in the United States’ (2014) 15 Wake Forest Law Rev 102
‘Buyers Beware as Fake Online Review Business Booms’ The Irish Times (25 June 2015)
Calliess, G-P., ‘Online Dispute Resolution: Consumer Redress in a Global Market Place’ (2006) 7(8) German Law J 647
Canto-Lopez, M., ‘Ofgem’s Recent Trends in Enforcement: Settlements, Redress and the Consumer’s Interest’ (2016) 21(2) Utilities Law Rev 6570
Capobianco, E., ‘Arbitrato e conciliazione. La risoluzione stragiudiziale delle controversie tra mediazione e procedura dinanzi all’Arbitro Bancario Finanziario’ (2010) 8(9) Obbl contr 571
Cappelletti, M., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes within the Framework of World-Wide Access-to-Justice Movement’ (1993) 56 Mod Law Rev 282
Cappelletti, M., ‘A World Survey’ in Cappelletti, M. and Garth, B. (eds.), Access to Justice vol. 1 (Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1978)
Ceeney, N., ‘Modernising Courts and Tribunals’ HM Courts and Tribunals Service (23 September 2015). Available at www.gov.uk/government/speeches/modernising-the-courts-and-tribunals
Centre for Consumer and Essential Services, University of Leicester ‘Complaint Handling by Airlines: Development of Best Practices’ Research Report for the Civil Aviation Authority (July 2014)
Centre for Retail Research, ‘Online Retailing: Britain, Europe and the US 2014’. Available at www.retailresearch.org/onlineretailing.php
Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Practice Guidelines 17: Guidelines for Arbitrators Dealing with Cases Involving Consumers and Parties with Significant Differences of Resources (2012)
Civic Consulting, European Parliament Study Cross-border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU (2011)
Civic Consulting Study for DG SANCO, ‘Study on the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU’ (2009)
Civil Aviation Authority, ‘Consumer Complaints Handling and ADR’ CAP 1286 (15 April 2015)
Civil Aviation Authority, Reforming Complaints Handling – Consultation on the CAA’s Draft Policy CAP 1257 (December 2014)
Civil Justice Council Advisory Group ‘Online Dispute Resolution for Low Value Civil Claims’ (February 2015)
Competition and Markets Authority, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers, Response to the Consultation on Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and the Online Dispute Resolution Regulation’ (3 June 2014)
Competition and Markets Authority, UK Presidency of ICPEN Report (30 June 2016)
Conley Tyler, M., ‘115 and Counting: The State of ODR 2004’, in Conley Tyler, M., Katsh, E. and Choi, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. International Conflict Resolution Centre in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP)
Conley Tyler, M. and Bornstein, J., ‘Accreditation of On-line Dispute Resolution Practitioners’ (2006) 23(3) Confl Resol Q 383
Consejo General de la Abogacía Española,‘Éxito Intermediación Hipotecaria en el CMICAV’ (13/08/2015)
Consumer Council of Northern Ireland, ‘Back to Business: Are Businesses Getting Consumers’ Rights Wrong?’ (December 2013)
Consumer Focus and DJS Research, ‘Dealing with Dissatisfaction: Complaint Handling in Energy, Water, Telecoms, Financial and Legal Services and Royal Mail’ (2012). Available at www.consumerfutures.org.uk/wpfb-file/dealing-with-dissatisfaction-pdf
Cooter, R. et al., ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior’ (1982) 11 Legal Stud 225
Cortés, P., ‘An Analysis of the UDRP Experience: Is It Time for Reform?’ (2008) 24(4) Comput Law Secur Rep 349
Cortés, P., ‘A Comparative Review of Offers to Settle – Would an Emerging Settlement Culture Pave the Way for Their Adoption in Continental Europe? (2013) 32(1) Civil Justice Q 4267
Cortés, P., ‘The Digitalisation of the Judicial System: Online Tribunals and Courts’ (2016) 22(6) Comput Telecommun Law Rev 141
Cortés, P., ‘Directive 2013/11/EU on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers and Regulation (EC) 524/2013 on Online Dispute Resolution’ in Lodder, A., Murray, A. and Wisman, T. (eds.), Commentary on the EU Regulation of Electronic Commerce and Information, 2nd edn (Edward Elgar, 2017)
Cortés, P., ‘Does the Proposed European Procedure Enhance the Resolution of Small Claims?’ (2008) 27(1) Civil Justice Q 8397
Cortés, P., ‘Enforcing EU Consumer Policy More Effectively: A Three-Pronged Approach’ in Drake, S. and Smith, M. (eds.), Effective Enforcement of EU Law and Policy (Edward Elgar, 2016)
Cortés, P., ‘A European Legal Perspective on Consumer ODR’ (2009) 15(4) Comput Telecommun Law Rev 92
Cortes, P., ‘European Small Claims Procedure and the Commission Proposal of 19 November 2013Report for the European Parliament (JURI, 2015) pp. 249279. Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/510003/IPOL_STUper cent282015per cent29510003_EN.pdf
Cortés, P., ‘The Impact of EU Law in the ADR Landscape in Italy, Spain and the UK: Time for Change or Missed Opportunity?’ (2015) 16(2) ERA Forum 125
Cortés, P., ‘Improving the EU’s Proposals for Extra-Judicial Consumer Redress’ (2012) 23(2) Comput Law 27
Cortés, P., ‘The Need for Synergies in Judicial Cooperation and Dispute Resolution: Changes in the European Small Claims Procedure’ in Kramer, X. and Hess, B. (eds.), From Common Rules to Best Practices in European Civil Procedure (Hart, 2017) forthcoming
Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016)
Cortés, P., ‘A New Regulatory Framework for Extra-Judicial Consumer Redress: Where We Are and How to Move Forward’ (2015) 35(1) Legal Stud, 114
Cortés, P., ‘Online Dispute Resolution for Businesses – Embedding Online Dispute Resolution in the Civil Justice System of the EU’ in Adamson, C. (ed.), Online Dispute Resolution: An International Business Approach to Solving Consumer Complaints (NetNeutrals, 2015) pp. 3646
Cortés, P., Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the European Union (Routledge, 2010)
Cortés, P., ‘Online Dispute Resolution Services: A Selected Number of Case Studies’ (2014) 20(6) Comput Telecommun Law Rev 172178
Cortés, P., ‘Small Claims in Ireland and the EU: The Need for Synergy between National Courts and Extrajudicial Redress’ in Neuwahl, N. and Hammamoun, S. (eds.), The European Small Claims Procedure and the Philosophy of Small Change (Les Éditions Thémis, 2014) pp. 125146
Cortés, P., ‘The UDRP Reviewed: The Need for a “Uniform” Policy’ (2008) 14(6) Comput Telecommun Law Rev 133
Cortés, P. and Esteban de la Rosa, F., ‘Building a Global Redress System for Low-Value Cross-Border Disputes’ (2013) 62(2) Int Comp Law Q 407
Cortés, P. and Lodder, A., ‘Consumer Dispute Resolution Goes Online: Reflections on the Evolution of European Law for Out-of-Court Redress’ (2014) 21(1) Maastricht J 14
Council of Europe Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination, ‘Equality and Non-Discrimination in the Access to Justice’ Report Doc 13740, Rapporteur: Mr V. Riceard Badea (31 March 2015)
Council of Europe Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, ‘Access to Justice through Online Instruments’ Draft Report, Rapporteur: Mr J. Xucla (2 November 2015)
Council of Europe Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, ‘Access to Justice through Online Instruments’ Introductory Memorandum, Rapporteur: Mr J. Xucla (23 September 2014)
Cownie, F. Bradney, A. and Burton, M., English Legal System in Context, 5th edn (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Creutzfeldt, N., ‘Ombudsman Schemes – Energy Sector in Germany, France and the UK’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016)
Creutzfeldt-Banda, N., ‘How Important Is Procedural Justice for Consumer Dispute Resolution? A Case Study of an Ombudsman Model for European Consumers’ (2014) 37(4) J Consumer Policy 527546
Cuenca García, A., ‘Los Principios de Transparencia, Eficacia, Equidad, Libertad y Legalidad en la Directiva 2013/11/EU del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 21 de Mayo de 2013, relativa a la Resolución Alternativa de Litigios en Materia de Consumo, y su Incidencia en el Sistema de Arbitraje de Consumo Español’ in Moreno, G. Palao (ed.), Los Nuevos Instrumentos Europeos en Materia de Conciliación, Mediación y Arbitraje de Consumo (Tirant, 2016) pp. 3780
Cunningham, A., ‘Caveat Consumer? Consumer Protection and Cloud Computing – Part I’ Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, n. 130, pp. 1–29 (January 2013)
Davies, J., ‘ADR/ODR: Too Much Optimism in the Promotion of Cross-Border Trade?’ in Hess, B., Bergstrom, M. and Storskrubb, E. (eds.), EU Civil Justice: Current Issues and Future Outlook (Hart, 2016) pp. 3556
Dávila González, F.J., ‘La Tramitación de la Resolución de Conflictos Sometidos a las Juntas Arbitrales de Consumo Mediante Medios Electrónicos. Problemas Prácticos y Propuestas de Lege Ferenda’ in de Castro, E. Vázquez (ed.), Estudios sobre la Justicia Online (Comares, 2013) pp. 4360
De Groote, B. and De Vulder, K., ‘European Framework for Unfair Commercial Practices: Analysis of Directive 2005/29’ (2007) JBL 16–42
Del Duca, L., Rule, C. and Loebl, Z., ‘Facilitating Expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce-Developing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System’ (2012) 1(1) Penn St J Law Int Aff 59
Del Duca, L., Rule, C. and Rimpfel, K., ‘eBay de Facto Low Value High Volume Resolution Process: Lessons and Best Practices for ODR Systems’ (2015) 4 Penn St J Law Int Aff 242
Del Duca, L., Rule, C. and Rogers, V., ‘Designing a Global Consumer Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) System for Cross-Border Small Value – High Volume Claims – OAS Developments’ (2010) 42(3) Uniform Commercial Code Law J 221
Deloitte, ‘An Assessment of the Socio-Economic Impacts of the Policy Options for the Future of the European Small Claims Regulation’ Final Report (19 July 2013)
Dennis, M., ‘Diseño de una Agencia Práctica para la Protección de los Consumidores en las Américas’ in Fernández Arroyo, D. and Rodríguez, J. Moreno (eds.) Trabajos de la CIDIP VII (Asunción, 2007) p. 219
Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers: Government Response to the Consultation on Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and the Online Dispute Resolution Regulation’ (November 2014)
Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers, Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and Online Dispute Resolution Regulation’ (March 2014)
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) ‘Checklist of Requirements for Providers of Alternative Dispute Resolution Services Who Wish to Become Certified “ADR Entities” for the Purposes of the ADR Directive’ (April 2014)
Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), ‘Civil Enforcement Remedies: Consultation on Extending the Range of Remedies Available to Public Enforcers of Consumer Law’ (November 2012)
Department for Business and Innovation Skills (BIS), Government Response to the Call for Evidence, EU Proposals on Alternative Dispute Resolution (May 2012)
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) ‘Guidance on Specific Points of Checklist for Attributes of ADR Entities’ (April 2014)
Department for Business and Innovation Skills (BIS) Report on ‘Consolidation and Simplification of UK Consumer Law’ (November 2010) and the Consumer Rights Bill 2013
Department for Transport – CAA, Changes to the CAA’s Policy on Consumer Complaint Handling and ADR (3 March 2016)
DG Justice and Consumers, European Commission, Consumer Conditions Scoreboard (2015)
DJS Report, ‘Understanding consumer experiences of complaints and redress’ Citizens Advice, (June 2016)
Doherty, M. and Leighton, P., ‘Research in Law: Who Funds It and What Is Funded? A Preliminary Investigation’ (2004) 38(2) Law Teach 182
Doktori, D. Karlik, E. and Perkins, L., ‘Stakeholder Analysis and Design Recommendations for an EU-Wide Online Dispute Resolution System’ Harvard Negotiation & Mediation Clinical Program (2 May 2012)
Donahey, S., ‘The UDRP Model Applied to Online Consumer Transactions’ (2003) 20(5) J Int Arb 475
Doyle, M., ‘Gazing at the ADR landscape – Is the EU Directive just a Mirage?’ (9 October 2013). Available at http://domarmediation.co.uk/2013/10/09/gazing-at-the-adr-landscape-is-the-eu-directive-just-a-mirage/
Doyle, M., Bondy, V. and Hirst, C., ‘The Use of Informal Resolution Approaches by Ombudsmen in the UK and Ireland: A Mapping Study’ (October 2014). Available at www.ombudsresearch.org.uk
Drahozal, C., ‘New Experiences of International Arbitration in the United States’ (2006) 54 Am J Comp Law 233
Duch-Brown, N. and Martens, B., ‘Barriers to Firms’ Cross-Border E-Commerce in the EU Digital Single Market’, JRC/IPTS Digital Economy Working Paper, 2015
eBay Business Equipment Protection. Available at http://pages.ebay.com/help/buy/business-protection.html
eBay Motors Vehicle Purchase Protection. Available at http://pages.motors.ebay.com/buy/purchase-protection/
Ebner, N. and Zeleznikow, J., ‘Fairness, Trust and Security in Online Dispute Resolution’ (2015) 36(2) Hamline Univ Sch Law J Pub Law Policy 143
Ebner, N. and Zeleznikow, J., ‘No Sheriff in Town: Governance for Online Dispute Resolution’ (2016) 32(4) Negot J 297
ECC Ireland, The Development of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Ireland – An Analysis of Complaints, Best Practices and Future Recommendations, 2008
ECC-Net, ‘Chargeback in the EU/EEA’ (2014)
ECC-Net, ‘Cross-Border Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Europe-Practical Reflections on the Need and Availability’ (2009)
ECC-Net, European Small Claims Procedure Report (September 2012). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/ecc/docs/small_claims_210992012_en.pdf
Economic Insight, ‘The Business Case for Good Complaints Handling in Legal Services’ Report for the Legal Ombudsman (November 2013).
Edwards, H., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema?’ (1985) 99 Harv Law Rev 668
Edwards, L. and Theunissen, A., ‘Creating Trust and Satisfaction Online: How Important Is ADR? The eBay Experience’ (2007) 5 Web J Curr Legal Issues
EESC, Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes, Rapporteur: Pegado Liz (CESE 803/2012 – INT/609)
Eidenmiller, H. and Engle, M., ‘Against False Settlement: Designing Efficient Consumer Rights Enforcement System in Europe29(2014) Ohio St J Disp Resol 261
Eidenmuller, H., Faust, F., Grigoleit, H.C., Jansen, N., Wagner, G. and Zimmerman, R., ‘Towards a Revision of the Consumer Acquis’ (2011) 48 Common Mark Law Rev 10771123
Eidenmullery, M. and Engel, H., ‘Against False Settlement: Designing Efficient Consumer Rights Enforcement Systems in Europe’ (2014) 29 Ohio St J Disp Resol 261
Eisenberg, M., ‘Private Ordering through Negotiation’ (1976) 89 Harv. Law Rev 637
El País, ‘Una Treintena de Empresas Pagarán por el Número de Quejas de Clientes’ (23 Febrero 2015)
Elliott, M. and Thomas, R., ‘Tribunal Justice and Proportionate Dispute Resolution’ (2012) 71(2) Camb Law J 279
Esteban de la Rosa, F., ‘Challenges for the Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive in Spain’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (OUP 2016) pp. 275296
Esteban de la Rosa, F., La protección del consumidor en dos espacios de integración: Europa y América (Tirant lo Blanch, 2015)
Esteban de la Rosa, F., ‘Principios De Protección Del Consumidor Para Una Iniciativa Europea En El Ámbito De La Resolución Electrónica De Diferencias (ODR) De Consumo Transfronterizas (2011) 25 Revista General de Derecho Europeo 1
EU Code of Conduct for Mediators 2014
European Commission, ‘Consumer Attitudes towards Cross-Border Trade and Consumer Protection. An Analytical Report’ Flash Eurobarometer 299 (March 2011)
European Commission, ‘The Consumer Conditions Scoreboard – Consumers at Home in the Single Market’ 9th edn (July 2013)
European Commission, EU Consumer Policy Strategy 2007–2013, COM(2007) 99 final
European Commission, ‘The Online Dispute Resolution PlatformExpert Group Meeting (Brussels, 12 December 2014)
European Consumer Centre – Ireland, Car Rental Contracts Business Practices, Contract Terms and Consumer Protection (2008). Available at www.eccireland.ie/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/ECC_Car_Rental_Contracts_Report_2008.pdf
European Consumer Centres Network, ‘10 Years Serving Europe’s Consumers Anniversary Report 2005–2015’. Available at http://tinyurl.com/zuxz4ch
European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) & Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) of Consumer Disputes’, BEUC Position Paper X/2012/010 (14 February 2012)
European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), ‘Improving Enforcement Cooperation – BEU Response to the Consultation on the Review of Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Regulation’ BEUC-X-2014-005 (3 February 2014)
European Parliament, Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Draft Report of 18 April 2012, 2011/0373(COD) Rapporteur L. Grech
European Parliament, Cross-Border ADR Final Report (2011) IP/A/IMCO/ST/2010-15
European Parliament Study Cross-Border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU (2011)
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, ‘Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)/Gross Domestic Product (GDP)’ (2013). Available at https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=hh3
Fernández Arroyo, D., ‘Current Approaches Towards Harmonisation of Consumer Private International Law in the Americas’ (2009) 58(2) ICLQ 420
Financial Conduct Authority, Consultation Paper, Improving Complaints Handling (December 2014)
Financial Ombudsman Service Annual Review 2014/15. Available at www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ar15/index.html#a2
Fisher, W. and Ury, M., Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Penguin, 1981)
Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B., Getting to Yes, Negotiating an Agreement without Giving In, 2nd edn (Random House, 1999)
Fiss, O., ‘Against Settlement93 (1984) Yale Law Rev 1073
Flash Eurobarometer Report Cross-Border and Consumer Protection (March 2011)
Fowlie, F., ‘Online Dispute Resolution and Ombudsmanship’ in Wahab, M., Katsh, E. and Rainey, D. (eds.), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012) pp. 313328
Froomkin, A., ‘ICANN Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy, Causes and (Practical) Cures’ (2002) 67 Brooklyn Law Rev 690
Fuller, L., ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harv Law Rev 353
Fuller, L., ‘Mediation – Its Forms and Functions’ (1971) 44 Calif Law Rev 305
Gabuthy, Y., ‘Online Dispute Resolution and Bargaining’ (2004) 17(3) Eur J Law Econ 353
Gascón Inchausti, F., ‘Algunas Reflexiones Acerca de la Oralidad y la Prueba en el Proceso de Escasa Cuantía’ (2006) VI Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional Privado 285308
Geist, M., ‘Fair.com? An Examination of the Allegations of Systematic Unfairness in the ICANN UDRP’ (2002) 27 Brooklyn J Int Law 903
Genn, H., ‘Civil Mediation: A Measured Approach?’ (2010) 32(2) J Soc Welf Fam Law 195
Genn, H., The Hamlyn Lectures 2008: Judging Civil Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2010)
Genn, H., ‘What Is Civil Justice for? Reform, ADR, and Access to Justice’ (2012) 24(1) Yale J Law Humanit 397417
GFK, Complaints to Ombudsman Services: Energy, Report for Ofgem Exploring Why Few Consumers Refer Their Complaint to Ombudsman Services: Energy (2013)
Gill, C. Williams, J. Brennan, C. and Hirst, C., ‘Designing Consumer Redress: A Dispute System Design (DSD) Model for Consumer-to-Business Disputes’ (2016) 36(3) Legal Stud 438
Gill, C. Williams, J. Brennan, C. and O’Brien, N., ‘The Future of Ombudsman Schemes: Drivers for Change and Strategic Responses’ (15 July 2013)
Glover, J. M., ‘Disappearing Claims and the Erosion of Substantive Law’ (2015) 125 Yale Law J 3
Goetzinger, L., Park, J.K. and Widdows, R., ‘E-Customers’ Third Party Complaining and Complementing Behavior (2006) 17(2) Int J Serv Ind Manag 193
Goodman, J., Strategic Customer Service: Managing the Customer Experience to Increase Positive Word of Mouth, Build Loyalty, and Maximize Profits (Amacon, 2009)
Gott, S., ‘BBB Offers Tips on When and How to File a Complaint’ Better Business Bureau (24 April 2013). Available at www.bbb.org/blog/2013/04/bbb-offers-tips-on-when-and-how-to-file-a-complaint/
Graham, C., ‘Collective Consumer Redress’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (OUP, 2016)
Grundmann, S., ‘Targeted Consumer Protection’ in Leczykiewicz, D. and Weatherill, S. (eds.), The Images of the Consumer in EU Law (Hart, 2015) pp. 223244
Halstead, D. and Page, T., ‘The Effects of Satisfaction and Complaining Behavior on Consumers Repurchase Behavior’ (1992) 5 J Satisf Dissatisf Complaining Behav 1
Hamilton, J. W., ‘Pre-Dispute Consumer Arbitration Clauses: Denying Access to Justice?’ (2006) 51 McGill Law J 693
Henry, R., ‘Med-Arb: An Alternative to Interest Arbitration in the Resolution of Contract Negotiation Disputes’ (1988) 3(2) Ohio St J Disp Resol 385
Hirschman, A., ‘Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States’ (Harvard University Press, 1970)
HMCTS, Civil Justice Statistics Quarterly, England and Wales (Incorporating Privacy Injunctions Statistics January to June 2015)
Hodges, C., ‘Collective Redress: A Breakthrough or a Damp Squib?’ (2014) 37 J Consum Policy 67
Hodges, C., ‘Collective Redress in Europe: The New Model’ (2010) 29(3) Civil Justice Q 373
Hodges, C., ‘Consumer Ombudsmen: Better Regulation and Dispute Resolution’ (2015) 16 ERA Forum 1
Hodges, C., ‘The Consumer as Regulator’ in Leczykiewicz, D. and Weatherill, S. (eds.), The Images of the Consumer in EU Law (Hart, 2015) pp. 245256
Hodges, C., ‘Ethical Business Regulation: Understanding the Evidence’ Better Regulation Delivery Office, Department for Business Innovation & Skills (February 2016)
Hodges, C., ‘The Need for a Holistic Review of the Dispute Resolution Landscape in England and Wales’ (2017) forthcoming
Hodges, C., ‘The Way Forward: Policy Principles on the Role of Law and Interests in ADR’ at the Fourth Annual Oxford Consumer ADR Conference (18–20 April 2016)
Hodges, C., Benohr, I. and Creutzfeldt-Banda, N., ‘Consumer-to-Business Dispute Resolution: The Power of CADR’ (2012) 13 ERA Forum 199225
Hodges, C., Benohr, I., Creutzfeldt-Banda, N., Consumer ADR in Europe (Civil Justice Systems) (Beck/Hart, 2012)
Hodges, C. Creutzfeldt, N. and Macleod, S., ‘Reforming the EU Consumer ADR Landscape: Implementation and Its Issues’ Third Oxford Consumer Conference Report (30–31 October 2014)
Hodges, C. and Stadler, A., Resolving Mass Disputes – ADR and Settlement of Mass Claims (Edward Elgar, 2013)
Hoofnagle, C. and Whittington, J., ‘Free: Accounting for the Costs of the Internet’s Most Popular Price’ (2014) 61 UCLA Law Rev 606
Hopt, K. and Steffek, F., Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press, 2012)
Horn, N., ‘Arbitraje de Consumo en el Derecho Alemán y Europeo’, in de la Rosa, F. Esteban and Pardo, G. Orozco (eds.), Mediación y Arbitraje de Consumo, una Perspectiva Española, Europea y Comparada (Tirant lo Blanch, 2010) pp. 221233
Hörnle, J., Cross-Border Internet Dispute Resolution (Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Hörnle, J., ‘Dispute Resolution: Digital Alternative’ Law Gazette (14 June 2014)
Hörnle, J., ‘Encouraging Online Dispute Resolution in the EU and Beyond-Keeping Costs Low or Standards High?’ Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 122/2012
Hörnle, J. and Cortés, P., ‘Draft Report for the ODR Advisory Group, Working Paper on Legal Issues in Online Dispute Resolution’ (July 2014)
Howells, G. and Weatherill, S., Consumer Protection Law, 2nd edn (Ashgate, 2005)
Hyde, J., ‘Ratings Website Moves into Law’ Law Society Gazette (4 August 2014)
Irvine, C., ‘Mind the Gap: Mediation and Justice’ Kluwer Mediation Blog (12 May 2014)
Jacquemin, H., ‘Optimal Integration European Dispute Resolution Platform’ European Parliament (13 April 2012). Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201204/20120413ATT42990/20120413ATT42990EN.pdf
Katsh, E. and Rabinovich-Einy, O., ‘Dispute Resolution in the Sharing Economy’ Internet Monitor 2014. Available at https://thenetmonitor.org/research/2014/
Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J., Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace (Jossey-Bass, 2001)
Katsh, E., Rifkin, J. and Gaitenby, A., ‘Ecommerce, E-disputes, and E-dispute Resolution: In the Shadow of “eBay Law”’ (2000) 15(3) Ohio St J Disp Resol 705
Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Schultz, T., Online Dispute Resolution (Kluwer Law International, 2004)
Kirkham, R., ‘Analysis: Richard Kirkham on the Government’s plans for consumer ADR: Innovation or more of the same’ (26 November 2014). Available at http://ukaji.org/2014/11/26/analysis-kirkham-the-governments-plans-for-consumer-adr-innovation-or-more-of-the-same/
Kirkham, R., ‘Regulating ADR: Lessons from the UK’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016)
Koulu, R., ‘Blockchains and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative to Enforcement’ (2016) 13(1) Scripted 41
Larson, D., ‘Technology Mediated Dispute Resolution (TMDR): A New Paradigm for ADR’ (2006) 21(3) Ohio St J Disp Resol 629
Le Sueur, A., ‘Designing Redress: Who Does It, How and Why? (2012) 20 Asia Pac Law Rev 17
Leczykiewicz, D. and Weatherill, S., ‘Images of the Consumer in EU Law’ in Leczykiewicz, D. and Weatherill, S. (eds.), The Images of the Consumer in EU Law (Hart, 2015)
Legal Ombudsman, Annual Report 2013–14
Legal Ombudsman News, View from Operations – Assessor. Issue 8 (2014). Available at www.legalombudsman.org.uk/leo-news/issue-8/view-assessor.html
Sir Leggatt, Andrew, Tribunals for Users: One System, One Service, Report of the Review of Tribunals (2011)
Leveson, B., ‘Security and Justice’ 13th Annual Isaiah Berlin Lecture (12 November 2015) Available at www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/berlin-lecture-nov-2015.pdf
Lincoln Law School, ‘Representative Actions and Restorative Justice’ (2008). Available at www.bis.gov.uk/files/file51559.pdf
Lodder, A. and Zeleznikow, J., Enhanced Dispute Resolution through the Use of Information Technology (Cambridge University Press, 2010)
Loos, M., ‘Consumer ADR After the Implementation of the ADR Directive: Enforcing European Consumer Rights at the Detriment of European Consumer Law’ Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015–42
Loos, M., ‘Individual Private Enforcement of Consumer Rights in Civil Courts in Europe’ Centre for the Study of European Contract Law Working Paper Series No. 2010/01
Lord Briggs, Justice, Civil Courts Structure Review Final Report (July 2016)
Lord Briggs, Justice, Civil Courts Structure Review, Interim Report (December 2015)
Lucerna Partners, Review of Ombudsman Services: Energy. A Report for Ofgem (London: Lucerna Partners, 2015)
Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., Reeves, D., ‘Pennies from eBay: the Determinants of Price in Online Auctions’ (2007) J Ind Econ 224
Luzak, J., ‘Online Consumer Contracts’ (2014) 15(3) ERA Forum 381
MacFarlane, J., ‘ADR and the Courts: Renewing our Commitment to Innovation’ (2012) 95(3) Marquette Law Rev 927
Madrid Parra, A., ‘El Uso de Medios Electrónicos en la Mediación Patrimonial’ (2013) 269 Derecho de los Negocios 2
Malbon, J., ‘Taking Fake Online Consumer Reviews Seriously’ (2013) 35 J Consum Policy 4
Manko, R., ‘European Small Claims Procedure: Commission Proposal to Remedy Weaknesses in the Current System’, EPRS In-depth analysis, PE 542.137 (November 2014)
Manko, R., ‘Europeanisation of Civil Procedure: Towards Common Minimum Standards?’ European Parlaimentary Research Service In-depth Analysis, PE 559.499 (June 2015)
Marchal Escalona, N., ‘La Protección del Consumidor en los Litigios Transfronterizos de Escasa Cuantía en la Unión Europea y en América Latina’ in de la Rosa, F. Esteban (ed.), La Resolución Alternativa de Litigios de Consumo en los Estados Miembros de la UE: Impacto del Nuevo Derecho Europeo (Tirant, 2015) pp. 10151054
Marques Cebola, C., ‘The Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive in Portugal: The Necessary Reform or Missed Opportunity?’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016) pp. 251274
Martic, D., ‘Redress for Free Internet Services Under the Scope of the EU and UNCITRAL’s ODR Regulations’ (2014) 10 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Electrônico 360
Martín Díz, F., ‘Mediacion en Derecho Privado: Nuevas Perspectivas Prácticas33 (2014) Revista General de Derecho Procesal 138
Matthews, J. M., ‘Consumer Arbitration: Is It Working Now and Will It Work in the Future?’ (2005) 79 Fl Bar J 1
Mayer-Schonberger, V. and Cukier, K., Big Data, a Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013)
McGill, S., ‘Consumer Arbitration after Seidel v TELUS’ (2011) 51 Can Bus Law J 187
McGregor, L., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution and Human Rights: Developing a Rights-Based Approach through the ECHR’ (2015) 26(3) Eur J Int Law 607634
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Are There Systematic Ethic Issues in Dispute System Design? And What We Should [Not] Do About It: Lessons from International and Domestic Fronts’ (Winter 2009) 14 Harv Negot Law Rev 202
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Do the “Haves” Come out Ahead in Alternative Judicial Systems? Repeat Players in ADR’ (1999) 15 Ohio St J Disp Resol 19
Menkel-Meadow, C., Love, L., Schneider, A. and Sternlight, J., Dispute Resolution: Beyond the Adversarial Model , 2nd edn (Aspen, 2011)
Micklitz, H.W., The Future of Consumer Law – Plea for a Movable System (2013) 2(1) J Eur Consum Mark Law 5
Micklitz, H. and Reich, N., ‘Crónica de una Muerte Anunciada: The Commission Proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights’ (2009) 46(2) Common Mark Law Rev 471
Micklitz, H. and Sartor, G., ‘Assessing the Scope of the Online Dispute Resolution Platform’ European Parliament (March 2012). Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201204/20120417ATT43146/20120417ATT43146EN.pdf
Mimica, N., EU Commissioner for Consumer Policy, ‘EU Consumer Summit 2014: Ensuring that Consumers Reap the Benefits of the Digital Economy’ Press Release IP/14/353 (1 April 2014)
Ministero della Giustizia, Dipartimento della Organizzazione Giudiziaria, del Personale e dei Servizi, Direzione Generale di Statistica ‘Mediazione Civile Ex DL 28/2010 Statistiche Relative al Priodo Gennaio – Settembre 2014
Ministry of Justice, ‘Caroline Dinenage responds to the launch of ‘Breaking up is Hard to Do’ report’ (17 December 2015). Available at www.gov.uk/government/speeches/caroline-dinenage-responds-to-the-launch-of-breaking-up-is-hard-to-do-report
Miquel Sala, R., El Proceso Europeo de Escasa Cuantía (Aranzadi, 2009) pp. 8185
Mnookin, R. and Korn Hauser, L., ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’ (1979) 88 Yale Law J 950
Moffitt, M., ‘Three Things to Be against (“Settlement Not Included”)’ (2009) 78 Ford Law Rev 1203
Morek, R., ‘The Regulatory Framework for Online Dispute Resolution: A Critical View’ (2006) 38 Univ Tol Law Rev 163
Mueller, M., ‘Rough Justice: An Analysis of ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy’ (2000) Syracuse University Convergence Centre http://dcc.syr.edu/PDF/roughjustice.pdf
Mullenix, L., ‘Ending Class Actions As We Know Them: Rethinking the American Class Action’ (2014) 64 Emory Law J 399
Nielsen, P.A., ‘The New Brussels I Regulation’ (2013) 50 Common Mark Law Rev 503528
Nordic Council of Ministers, ‘A Study on Alternative Dispute Resolution and Cross-border Complaints in Europe’ (TemaNord, 2002)
O’Brian, E., ‘The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments: The Way Forward’ (2003) 66(4) Mod Law Rev 491
OECD, Conference on Empowering E-consumers Strengthening Consumer Protection in the Internet Economy, Background Report DSTI/CP(2009)20/FINAL, Washington DC, (8–10 December 2009)
OECD, Economics Department Policy Notes ‘What Makes Civil Justice Effective’ (18 June 2013)
Ombudsman Services, Response to the Competition Markets Authority Energy Market Investigation ‘Issues Statement’ (14 August 2014)
Online Retail Monitor, British Retail Consortium (2016). Available at www.brc.org.uk/bis/default.asp?main_id=7
Organisation of American States, Draft [Model Law/Cooperative Framework] for Electronic Resolution of Cross-Border E-Commerce Consumer Disputes (2010)
Ortiz, J.C., ‘La Aplicación en España de los Procesos Europeos Monitorio y de Escasa Cuantía: La Reforma de la Legislación Española en Virtud de la Ley 4/2011, de 24 d Marzo’ (2011) 24 Revista General de Derecho Procesal 2
Ortolani, P., ‘Self-Enforcing Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons from Bitcoin’ (2016) 36(3) Oxf J Legal Stud 595629
Peretz, N., ‘The Single Euro Payment Area: A New Opportunity for Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union’ (2008) 16 Mich St J Int Law 573
Pérez Luño, A.E., La Seguridad Juridical (Ariel, 1994)
Petrucci, C., ‘Collective Redress and Competition Law’ in Drake, S. and Smith, M. (eds.), Effective Enforcement of EU Law and Policy (Edward Elgar, 2016)
Pilia, C., Cortés, P. and Vargiu, P., ‘The Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive in Italy’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016) pp. 209228
Ponte, L. and Cavenagh, T., Cyberjustice, Online Dispute Resolution for E-Commerce (Parson Prentice Hall, 2005)
Posner, R., ‘Conventionalism: The Key to Law as an Autonomous Discipline’ (1988) 38 Univ Tor Law J 333
Prince, S., ‘Mediating Small Claims: Are We on the Right Track?’ (2007) 26(2) Civil Justice Q 328340
Prisco, G., ‘Bitrated Unveils Reputation System and Multisig Escrow’ (24 February 2015). Available at https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitrated-unveils-reputation-system-multisig-escrow-1424750534
Rabinovich-Einy, O., ‘Technology’s Impact: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Accountability in Mediation’ (2006) 11 Harv Negot Law Rev 253
Rabinovich-Einy, O. and Katsh, E., ‘Lessons from Online Dispute Resolution for Dispute System Design’ in Wahab, M., Katsh, E. and Rainey, D. (eds.), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012) pp. 3960
Rabinovich-Einy, O. and Katsh, E., ‘Technology and the Future of Dispute System Design’ (2012) 17 Harv Negot Law Rev 175
Ramsay, I., Consumer Law and Policy, 3rd edn (Hart, 2012)
Reding, V., Vice-President of the European Commission and EU Commissioner for Justice ‘Towards a More Coherent Enforcement of EU Consumer Rules’ (19 March 2013). Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-237_en.htm
Reich, N., ‘Party Autonomy and Consumer Arbitration in Conflict: A “Trojan Horse” in the Access to Justice in the EU ADR Directive 2013/11?’ (2015) 4(1) Penn St J Law Int Aff 290
Reich, N., ‘A “Trojan Horse” in Access to Justice – Party Autonomy and Consumer Arbitration in Conflict in the ADR-Directive 2013/11/EU’ (2014) 10(2) Eur Rev Contract Law 258
Report of the Working Group on Consumer and Competition Policy for Scotland (October 2015)
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J. and Lockwood, K., ‘The Value of Reputation on eBay: a Controlled Experiment’ (2006) 9 Exp Econ 79
Reyes López, M.J., ‘La Reforma del TRLGDCU en Materia de Arbitraje’ in Moreno, G. Palao (ed.), Los Nuevos Instrumentos Europeos en Materia de Conciliación, Mediación y Arbitraje de Consumo (Tirant, 2016) pp. 231248
Riefa, C., Consumer Protection and Online Auction Platforms (Ashgate, 2015)
Roberts, S. and Palmer, M., Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making, 2nd ed (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Rogers, N. Bordone, R. Sander, F. and McEwen, C., Designing Systems and Processes for Managing Disputes (Kluwer, 2013)
Rogers, V., Institute of International Commercial Law (Pace Law School) Note on the Resolution Process Designated by the Draft ODR Rules Vienna, 14–18 November 2011
Rogers, V., ‘Managing Disputes in the Online Global Marketplace: Reviewing the Progress of UNCITRAL’s Working Group III on ODR’ (2013) 19 Disp Resol Mag 21
Ross, G., ‘The Possible Unintended Consequences of the European Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Regulation on Online Dispute Resolution’ (2014) 10 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Electrônico 206221
Rühl, G., ‘Alternative and Online Dispute Resolution for (Cross-Border) Consumer Contracts: A Critical Evaluation of the European Legislature’s Recent Efforts to Promote Competitiveness and Growth in the Internal Market’ (2015) 38 J Consum Policy 380
Rule, C., ‘AAA Chooses ODR for Its Largest Volume Case Load’ (2014) 1(1) Int J Online Disp Resol 97
Rule, C., ‘How the Internet Is Changing the Way Disputes Are Resolved’ Wire Innovation Insights (24 June 2014). Available at http://insights.wired.com/profiles/blogs/how-the-internet-is-changing-the-way-disputes-are-resolved#axzz39bcSIGVK
Rule, C., ‘Making Peace on eBay’, ACResolution (Fall 2008)
Rule, C., Online Dispute Resolution for Businesses. B2B, E-Commerce, Consumer, Employment, Insurance, and Other Commercial Conflicts (Jossey Bass, 2002)
Rule, C., ‘Quantifying the Economic Benefits of Effective Redress: Large E-Commerce Data Sets and the Cost-Benefit Case for Investing in Dispute Resolution’ (2012) 34 Univ of Ark Little Rock Law Rev 767
Rule, C. and Del Duca, L., ‘From Lex Mercatoria to Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons From History in Building Cross-Border Redress Systems’ (2011) 43(3) Uniform Commercial Code Law J 115
Rule, C. and Nagarajan, C., ‘Leveraging the Wisdom of Crowds: The eBay Community Court and the Future of Online Dispute Resolution’, AC Resolution (2010)
Rutherglen, G., ‘Wal-Mart, AT&T Mobility, and the Decline of the Deterrent Class Action’ (2012) 98 Virginia Law Rev 24
Samuel, A., ‘Consumer Financial Services in Britain: New Approaches to Dispute Resolution and Avoidance’ (2002) 3(3) Eur Bus Organ Law Rev 649694
Sander, F., ‘Varieties of Dispute Resolution’ National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice 7–9 April 1976 Pound Conference (1976) 79 FRD 111
Sander, F. and Goldberg, S., ‘Fitting the Forum to the Fuss: A User-Friendly Guide to Selecting an ADR Procedure’ (1994) 10(1) Negot J 4968
Sapp, W., ‘Creating an Online Property Guide and Resolution Center’ Fair and Equitable (April 2014)
Scannicchio, N., ‘L’Adeguamento dell’ Ordinamento Italiano alla Nuova Disciplina Europea sulla Risolutzione Alternativea Delle Controversie di Consumo’ in de la Rosa, F. Esteban (ed.), La Resolución Alternativa De Litigios De Consumo En Los Estados Miembros De La UE: Impacto Del Nuevo Derecho Europeo (Tirant, 2015)
Schmitz, A., ‘“Drive-Thru” Arbitration in the Digital Age: Empowering Consumers through Regulated ODR’ (2010) 62 Baylor Law Rev 178244
Schmitz, A., ‘Introducing the “New Handshake” to Expand Remedies and Revive Responsibility in eCommerce’ (2014) 26 St. Thomas Law Rev 522
Schmitz, A., ‘Legislating in the Light: Considering Empirical Data in Crafting Arbitration Reforms’ (2010) 15 Harv Negot Law Rev 194
Schoenberger, C., ‘Computers’ Reasoning Skills to Equal Humans by 2029’ (26 June 2012). Available at www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303640804577490681107864926
Schulte-Nölke, H., ‘EC Law on the Formation of – From Common Frame of Reference to the ‘Blue Button’’’ (2007) 3 Eur Rev Contract Law 332
Schultz, T., ‘Does Online Dispute Resolution Need Governmental Intervention? The Case for Architectures of Control and Trust’ (2004) 6 N C J Law Technol 71
Schultz, T., ‘Internet Disputes, Fairness in Arbitration and Transnationalism: A Reply to Julia Hörnle’ (2011) 19(2) Int J Law Inf Technol 156
Schultz, T., ‘Private Legal Systems: What Cyberspace Might Teach Legal Theorists’ (2007) 10 Yale J Law Techol 159
Schultz, T., ‘The Roles of Dispute Settlement and ODR’ in Ingen-Housz, (ed.), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures (Kluwer, 2011) p. 135
Sela, A., ‘The Effect of Online Technologies on Online Dispute Resolution System Design: Antecedents, Current Trends and Future Directions’ (2017) 21(3) Lewis Clark Law Rev 148
Shackelford, S. and Raymond, A., ‘Building the Virtual Courthouse: Ethical Considerations for Design, Implementation, and Regulation in the World of ODR’ (2014) Wis Law Rev 616
Síndic de Greuges de Catalunya, ‘The Catalan Ombudsman and General Interest Companies’ (February 2014)
Smith, S. and Martinez, J., ‘An Analytical Framework for Dispute System Design’ (2009) 14(4) Harv Negot Law Rev 1401
Sorkin, D. E., ‘Payment Methods for Consumer-to-Consumer Online Transactions’ (2001) 35(1) Akron Law Rev 1
Special Eurobarometer 381, E-Communication Household Survey (June 2012)
Special Eurobarometer 395, European Small Claims Procedure (April 2013). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_395_en.pdf
Speer, T.They Complain Because They Care’ (1996) 18 Am Demogr 13
Sternlight, J.In Defense of Mandatory Arbitration (If Imposed on the Company)’ (2007) 8 Nevada Law J 82
Sternlight, J.Is Alternative Dispute Resolution Consistent With the Rule of Law’ (2006) 56 DePaul Law Rev 569
Sternlight, J. and Jensen, E., ‘Using Economic Arbitration to Eliminate Consumer Class Actions: Efficient Business Practice or Unconscionable Abuse?’ (2004) 67 Law Contemp Probl 75
Stewart, K. and Matthews, J., ‘Online Arbitration of Cross-Border, Business to Consumer Disputes’ (2002) 56 Univ Miami Law Rev 1119
Stipanowich, T., ‘The Arbitration Penumbra: Arbitration Law and the Rapidly Changing Landscape of Dispute Resolution’ (2007) 8 Nevada Law J 427
Stone, M., ‘A Paradox in the Theory of Commercial Arbitration’ (1966) 21(3) Arbitration J 156163
Stuhmcke, A., ‘The Corporatisation and Privatisation of the Australian Telecommunications Industry: The Role of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman’ (1998) 21(3) Univ N S W Law J 807
Stürner, M., Gascón Inchausti, F. and Caponi, R., The Role of Consumer ADR in the Administration of Justice – New Trends in Access to Justice under EU Directive 2013/11 (Selp, 2015)
Stuyck, J., Terryn, E., Colaert, V., Van Dyck, T., Peretz, N., Hoekx, N. and Tereszkiewicz, P., Study on Alternative Means of Consumer Redress Other Than Redress through the Ordinary Judicial Proceedings (Catholic University of Lueven, 14 January 2007)
Susskind, R., The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Susskind, R., Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future (Oxford University Press, 2013)
The Economist, ‘The Truly Personal Computer’ (28 February 2015)
The Irish Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation ‘Consultation on the Implementation of the EU Directive on Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution and the EU Regulation on Consumer Online Dispute Resolution’ (June 2014)
Thompson, D., ‘Addressing Leveraging Technology in Civil Justice ODR’ Comput Law (6 October 2014)
Thompson, D., ‘Online Dispute Resolution Expansion in the EU’ (2012) Comput Law 31 (3 December 2011)
Tulibacka, M., ‘Europeanization of Civil Procedures: In Search of a Coherent Approach’ (2009) 46 Common Mark Law Rev 15271565
UK Office for National Statistics, ‘Statistical bulletin: Internet Access – Households and Individuals, 2013’. Available at www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/rdit2/internet-access–households-and-individuals/2013/stb-ia-2013.html
University of Lincoln, Lincoln Law School ‘Representative Actions and Restorative Justice’ (2008). Available at www.bis.gov.uk/files/file51559.pdf
Ury, W., Brett, J. and Goldberg, S., Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflicts (Jossey-Bass, 1988)
US Department of Health and Human Services, ‘Policy Issues Related to Patient Reported Data’ (8 June 2012) p. 8, available at http://tinyurl.com/jsc42oz
Van Boom, W. and Loos, M. (eds.), Collective Enforcement of Consumer Law: Securing Compliance in Europe through Private Group Action and Public Authority Intervention (Europa Law Publishing, 2007)
Vilalta, E., ‘ODR and E-Commerce’ in Wahab, M., Katsh, E. and Rainey, D. (eds.), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012) pp. 113138
Vilalta Nicuesa, A. E., Mediación y Arbitraje Electrónicos (Aranzadi, 2013)
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. and Lodder, A.R., ‘Gearbi: Towards an Online Arbitration Environment Based On The Design Principles Simplicity, Awareness, Orientation, And Timeliness’ (2005) 13(2) Artif Intell Law 297
Wagner, G., ‘Private Law Enforcement Through ADR: Wonder Drug Or Snake Oil?’ (2014) 51(1) Common Mark Law Rev 165194
Wahab, M., Katsh, E. and Rainey, D., Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012)
Weatherill, S., ‘The Consumer Rights Directive: How and Why a Quest for “Coherence” Has (Largely) Failed’ (2012) 49 Common Mark Law Rev 1279
Weatherill, S. EU Consumer Law and Policy (Edward Elgar, 2014)
Weatherill, S. and Bernitz, U. (eds.), The Regulation of Unfair Commercial Practices under Directive 2005/29: New Rules and New Techniques (Hart, 2007)
Webb, L.Brainstorming Meets Online Dispute Resolution’ (2004) 15 Am Rev Int Arb 337
Webb, L.International BBB Ratings á la eBay: A Proposal for an Improved Online Better Business Bureau to Facilitate International Business Transactions’ (2004) 35 Calif West Int Law J 127
Which?, ‘Millions experience problems with online purchases’ (7 March 2014)
Williams, J. and Gill, C., ‘A Dispute System Design Perspective on the Future Development of Consumer Dispute Resolution’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The European Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (OUP, 2016) pp. 371392
Winston, K., ‘Introduction to the Revised Edition’ in Winston, K. (ed.), The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller (Hart, 2001)
Yuthayotin, S., Access to Justice in Transnational B2C E-Commerce (Springer, 2015)
Zickuhr, K. ‘Who’s Not Online and Why’ Pew Research (25 September 2013)