Permission and Consent

Terry L. Price

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809972.006

5 - Permission and Consent

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Terry L. Price

Show author details

Terry L. Price: Affiliation:
University of Richmond

Book contents

Get access

Summary

ALLOWING EXCEPTIONS

The argument of the previous chapter challenged one familiar way of grounding the special moral status of leaders. Trait views of leadership, as well as virtue theories of ethics with which they are associated, ignore the tendency of leaders to exaggerate how special they are in terms of their personal characteristics. Because of these tendencies, we should be especially wary of leaders who appeal to particular traits and virtues to justify their rule-breaking behavior.

To the student of leadership, it will come as little surprise to learn that if leaders do have special moral status, then this status cannot be derived simply from the qualities of leaders themselves. Moral and political analyses of leadership long ago turned their attention to the nature of the relationships between leaders and followers – for example, to the ethical importance of “the consent of the governed.” Leader-centric approaches to the empirical study of leadership have also gone out of favor, at least in part because of their failure to attend to the role of followers in the leadership process. Whether prescriptive or descriptive in nature, most contemporary work on leadership recognizes that leadership is a complex phenomenon, one that involves more than individual leaders and their personal characteristics.

The search for an answer to the central question of leadership ethics – Do the distinctive features of leadership justify rule-breaking behavior? – must therefore expand the potential grounds of justification for rule-breaking behavior by leaders and consider group-centric approaches.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Leadership Ethics
An Introduction
, pp. 119 - 141

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809972.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E., The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law[Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998], 240)Google Scholar

Martz, Michael, “Judge faults Wilder on eviction; ruling lets school board sue over aborted move, validates City Hall lease,” Richmond Times-Dispatch [November 6, 2007]

Hollander, , Leaders, Groups, and Influence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964), 16Google Scholar

Plato, , Republic, trans. Grube, G. M. A. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1992), 35 [359c]Google Scholar

Buchanan, “Justice as Reciprocity versus Subject-Centered Justice,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1990): 228Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, Brock, Dan W., Daniels, Norman, and Wickler, Daniel, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), ch. 7CrossRef Google Scholar

Hicks, Douglas A., Religion and the Workplace: Pluralism, Spirituality, Leadership[Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003], 168–173)CrossRef Google Scholar

Yukl, Gary, Leadership in Organizations, 6th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2006), 129Google Scholar

Rawls, , A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter, The Animals Issue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)CrossRef Google Scholar

Price, Terry L. and Hicks, Douglas A., “A Framework for a General Theory of Leadership,” in The Quest for a General Theory of Leadership, eds. Goethals, George R. and Sorenson, Georgia L. J. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2006), 123–151Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E., “Servility and Self-Respect,” in his Autonomy and Self-Respect (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 4–18CrossRef Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. Paton, H. J. (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1964), 89–91, 96–98Google Scholar

Hermanson, Dana, “Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance,” Internal Auditing 21, 2 (2006): 36–37Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. and Grinstein, Y., “The Growth of Executive Pay,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 21 (2005): 285–303CrossRef Google Scholar

Conger, Jay A., “Oh Lord, Won't You Buy Me a Mercedes-Benz: How Compensation Practices Are Undermining the Credibility of Leaders,” in The Quest for Moral Leaders: Essays in Leadership Ethics, eds. Ciulla, Joanne B., Price, Terry L., and Murphy, Susan E. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005), 83–84Google Scholar

Kleinfield, N. R., “Life, liberty and the pursuit of free box seats: One man's perks anger many, but to New Yorkers, corporate goodies are a right,” New York Times (September 22, 2002)

Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 375CrossRef Google Scholar

Hume, David, “Of the Original Contract,” in Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1987), 465–487Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.