Artelt, C., Schiefele, U. & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 363–383.Google Scholar

Besch, W., Knoop, U., Putschke, W. & Wiegand, H. E. (1982). Dialektologie: Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, P. G. & Newby-Clark, E. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition. Reading and Writing, 15, 109–126.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M. & Landerl, K. (2010). The influences of syllable structure and reading ability on the development of phoneme awareness: A longitudinal, cross-linguistic study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 464–484.Google Scholar

Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Elsen, H. (1991). Erstspracherwerb: Der Erwerb des deutschen Lautsystems. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, A. V. (2006). Evidence from German-speaking children. In Hua, Z. & Dodd, B. (Eds.), Phonological development and disorders in children: A multilingual perspective (pp. 56–80). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Frith, U., Wimmer, H. & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31–54.Google Scholar

Grijzenhout, J. & Joppen, S. (1998). First steps in the acquisition of German phonology: A case study (SFB 282 Working Paper Nr. 110). Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität.Google Scholar

Holmes, V. M. & Castles, A. E. (2001). Unexpectedly poor spelling in university students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 319–350.Google Scholar

Kargl, R., Purgstaller, C., Weiss, S. & Fink, A. (2008). Effektivitätsüberprüfung eines morphemorientierten Grundwortschatz-Segmentierungstrainings (MORPHEUS) bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Heilpädagogische Forschung, 34, 147–156.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klicpera, C. (2000). Sind Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten Ausdruck einer phonologischen Störung? Die Entwicklung des orthographischen Wissens und der phonologischen Rekodierungsfähigkeit bei Schülern der 2. bis 4. Klasse Grundschule [Are spelling difficulties the expression of a phonological deficit? The development of orthographic knowledge and phonological recoding ability in the 2nd to 4th grade of the elementary school]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 32, 134–142.Google Scholar

Klicpera, C. & Schabmann, A. (1993). Do German-speaking children have a chance to overcome reading and spelling difficulties? A longitudinal survey from the second until the eighth grade. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, M. R. & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landerl, K. (2001). Word recognition deficits in German: More evidence from a representative sample. Dyslexia, 7, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Landerl, K., Ramus, F., Moll, K., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lohvansuu, K., … Schulte-Körne, G. (2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 686–694.Google Scholar

Landerl, K., Rau, A. & Moll, K. (2012, July). Development of eye-movement patterns in word and nonword reading in English and German. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Landerl, K. & Reiter, C. (2002). Lesegeschwindigkeit als Indikator für basale Lesefertigkeiten. In Wallner-Paschon, C. & Haider, G. (Eds.), PISA PLUS 2000: Thematische Analysen nationaler Projekte (S. 61–66). Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.Google Scholar

Landerl, K. & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and orthographic spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.Google Scholar

Landerl, K., Wimmer, H. & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. P. (Ed.) (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 16th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar

Lindner, K. & Kieferle, C. (2003, October). Ging, gehte or gang? What do children in third and fourth grade know about past tense forms of irregular verbs? International conference: Oral language of school children: Acquisition, teaching and remediation, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar

Lleó, C., Kuchenbrandt, I., Kehoe, M. & Trujillo, C. (2003). Syllable final consonants in Spanish and German monolingual and bilingual acquisition. In Müller, N. (Ed.), (In)vulnerable domains in multilingualism (pp. 191–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lleó, C. & Prinz, M. (1997). Syllable structure parameters and the acquisition of affricates. In Hannahs, S. J. & Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition (Language acquisition & language disorders) (pp. 143–163). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mann, V. & Wimmer, H. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653–682.Google Scholar

Moll, K., Fussenegger, B., Willburger, E. & Landerl, K. (2009). RAN is not a measure of orthographic processing: Evidence from the asymmetric German orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moll, K. & Landerl, K. (2009). Double dissociation between reading and spelling deficits. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 359–382.Google Scholar

Moll, K. & Landerl, K. (2010). Lese- und Rechtschreibtest (SLRT II) [Reading and spelling test SLRT II]. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 3–24.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.Google Scholar

Rau, A. K., Moeller, K. & Landerl, K. (2014). The transition from sublexical to lexical processing in a consistent orthography: An eye-tracking study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 224–233.Google Scholar

Richter, T., Isberner, M.-B., Naumann, J. & Neeb, Y. (2013). Lexical quality and reading comprehension in primary school children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 415–434.Google Scholar

Röhr-Sendlmeier, U. M. (1985). Zum sprachlichen Entwicklungsstand des Grundschulkindes. Linguistische Berichte, 98, 338–346.Google Scholar

Schabmann, A., Landerl, K., Bruneforth, M. & Schmidt, B. M. (2012). Lesekompetenz, Leseunterricht und Leseförderung im österreichischen Schulsystem: Analysen zur pädagogischen Förderung der Lesekompetenz. In Herzog-Punzenberger, B. (Ed.), Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2012. Band 2: Fokussierte Analysen bildungspolitischer Schwerpunktthemen (pp. 17–70). Graz: Leykam.Google Scholar

Schaefer, B., Fricke, S., Szczerbinski, M., Fox-Boyer, A.V., Stackhouse, J. & Wells, B. (2009). Development of a test battery for assessing phonological awareness in German-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 404–430.Google Scholar

Schneider, W., Roth, E. & Ennemoser, M. (2000). Training phonological skills and letter knowledge in children at risk for dyslexia: A comparison of three kindergarten intervention programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.Google Scholar

Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tallal, P. (1984). Temporal or phonetic processing deficit in dyslexia? That is the question. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 167–169.Google Scholar

Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K. & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing.Google Scholar

Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

van Kraayenoord, C. E. & Schneider, W. E. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 305–324.Google Scholar

Wiese, R. (1996). The phonology of German. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H. & Hummer, P. (1990). How German-speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H. & Landerl, K. (1997). How learning to spell German differs from learning to spell English. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L. & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 81–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R. & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219–249.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., Landerl, K. & Schneider, W. (1994). The role of rhyme awareness in learning to read a regular orthography. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 469–484.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H. & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 272–277.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H. & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.Google Scholar

Wolf, M. & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.Google Scholar