Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- List of figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 A clash over equality
- 2 A worldwide value divide
- 3 Two tales of globalization
- 4 The rise of the modern state system (1776–1945)
- 5 The age of universality (1945–1980)
- 6 The triumph of market democracy (1980–2007)
- 7 Twenty-first-century rapprochement
- 8 The core currency of political exchange
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
2 - A worldwide value divide
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- List of figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 A clash over equality
- 2 A worldwide value divide
- 3 Two tales of globalization
- 4 The rise of the modern state system (1776–1945)
- 5 The age of universality (1945–1980)
- 6 The triumph of market democracy (1980–2007)
- 7 Twenty-first-century rapprochement
- 8 The core currency of political exchange
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
How widespread really is the language of left and right? One could recognize the clash about equality just described, but consider it largely a concern for experts and politicians, at a distance from the preoccupations and views of most people around the world. Outside the Western world, in particular, the left–right dichotomy may seem less relevant as a heuristic tool. This chapter uses global public opinion trends to demonstrate, on the contrary, that practically everywhere citizens understand this representation and position themselves along an axis going from left to right. The left–right cleavage is neither Western, nor passé. It is ubiquitous and very much contemporary.
This chapter presents worldwide survey results that establish the near-universal relevance of the left–right division and its coherence for most people, who associate the two sides with the expected attitudes about equality, redistribution, and the role of the state. Country-specific data also confirms that these findings hold across very different regions and cultures of the world. The left–right debate is truly global. Indeed, in both national and comparative studies of public opinion, no cognitive instrument, no scale measuring personal values is more powerful than the way respondents locate themselves on the left–right continuum. Even scholars who claim that the left–right cleavage is in decline or in transformation cannot but conclude that it still incorporates most of the other attitude differences they seek to explain. This opposition is the most central value divide that political parties built as they struggled for, and about, democracy.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Left and Right in Global Politics , pp. 32 - 55Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
, Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton University Press, 1997, p. 319.Google Scholar
and , “The Vietnamese Public in Transition: The 2001 World Values Survey,” Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine, 2001 (www.democ.uci.edu).
, “Grassroots Democracy in Vietnamese Communes,” Centre for Democratic Institutions, Australian National University, 2004, p. 29 (www.cdi.anu.edu.au).
, Right Hand, Left Hand: The Origins of Asymmetry in Brains, Bodies, Atoms and Cultures, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2002, pp. 261–64.Google Scholar
, , , and , Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation, Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 104–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton University Press, 1989, pp. 292–93;Google Scholar
, Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, third edition, Chatham, NJ, Chatham House, 2002, pp. 201–03;Google Scholar
and , Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.Google Scholar
, , , and , Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Introduction: The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America,” in and (eds.), The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
, , and , Capitalist Development and Democracy, University of Chicago Press, 1992, p. 293.Google Scholar
, Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 13, 187, and 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Dilemmas of Democracy in the Open Economy: Lessons from Latin America,” World Politics, vol. 56, no. 2, January 2004, 262–302, p. 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Neoliberalism and Democracy in Latin America: A Mixed Record,” Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 46, no. 1, Spring 2004, 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America, Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Democracy and Political Representation in Latin America: Pause, Reorganization, or Decline?,” in and (eds.), Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America, Miami, North-South Center Press at the University of Miami, 1998, pp. 112–13;Google Scholar
, “Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America: Taking Stock of the 1990s,” in and (eds.), Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, second edition, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003, pp. 358–66.Google Scholar
, “Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe,” Comparative Politics, vol. 31, no. 4, July 1999, 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World,” World Politics, vol. 54, no. 3, April 2002, 308–37, pp. 312–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Iran's Crumbling Revolution,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 82, no. 1, January/February 2003, 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “From Social Democracy to Social Democracy: The Twentieth-Century Odyssey of the Iranian Left,” in (ed.), Reformers and Revolutionaries in Modern Iran: New Perspectives on the Iranian Left, London, Routledge, 2004, p. 50.Google Scholar
and , “The True Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Policy, no. 135, March/April 2003, 67–74.Google Scholar
, “Freedom in the World 2006: Selected Data from Freedom House's Annual Global Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties,” New York, Freedom House, 2006 (www.freedomhouse.org).
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.