Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction: legacies of empire
- Part I Incomplete transitions from empires to nation states
- Part II Legacies of non-European empires in today's world
- 5 The legacy of Eurasian nomadic empires: remnants of the Mongol imperial tradition
- 6 The modern roots of feudal empires: the donatary captaincies and the legacies of the Portuguese Empire in Brazil
- 7 Imperial legacies in the UN Development Programme and the UN development system
- Part III The future legacies of the American Empire
- Index
- References
6 - The modern roots of feudal empires: the donatary captaincies and the legacies of the Portuguese Empire in Brazil
from Part II - Legacies of non-European empires in today's world
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction: legacies of empire
- Part I Incomplete transitions from empires to nation states
- Part II Legacies of non-European empires in today's world
- 5 The legacy of Eurasian nomadic empires: remnants of the Mongol imperial tradition
- 6 The modern roots of feudal empires: the donatary captaincies and the legacies of the Portuguese Empire in Brazil
- 7 Imperial legacies in the UN Development Programme and the UN development system
- Part III The future legacies of the American Empire
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The history of the Portuguese Empire in Brazil and its influence on contemporary Brazil is a story of multiple legacies. In this chapter I explore these through a study of the initial Portuguese policy of settlement of the Brazilian colony.
Eager to defend its colonial lands in Brazil from foreign powers, between 1534 and 1536 the Portuguese Crown divided the land of the colony in longitudinal tracks, or slices, going from the coast to the imaginary line set by the Treaty of Tordesillas. Brazil was thus subdivided into 15 units that became known as capitanias hereditarias – hereditary captaincies. The system of hereditary captaincies would formally last only a little more than a decade, being abolished in 1549. Nevertheless, its impact on social, economic and political affairs in Brazil has been important. Each of these captaincies was given to donatários – members of the Portuguese lower nobility or bureaucrats close to João III – whose duty it became to administer the land, colonize it and protect it against foreign invasions (see Burns 1970; Skidmore 2010: 9–18). The donatários were in turn given the right to exploit most of the natural resources of their captaincy.
While this mode of imperial expansion and consolidation was officially abandoned in 1549, it continued in practice, albeit in more of a hybrid form, until 1753 when the last captaincies were subsumed into the public administration of the crown.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Legacies of EmpireImperial Roots of the Contemporary Global Order, pp. 128 - 148Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
and (2002) ‘Creating Colonial Brazil: The First Donatary Captaincies, or the System of Private Exclusivity, 1534–1549’. In and (eds.) Constructing Early Modern Empires: Proprietary Ventures in the Atlantic World, 1500–1750. Leiden: Brill, 21–55.Google Scholar
(1997) Chapters of Brazil's Colonial History, 1500–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014) ‘The Confessional State in International Politics: Tudor England, Religion, and the Eclipse of Dynasticism’. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 25(3), 407–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2014) ‘Sovereignty and Solidarity: Moral Obligation, Confessional England, and the Huguenots’. The International History Review. Published online 13 February. DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2013.879912CrossRef
, and (2011) ‘The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths That Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1648 and 1919’. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 735–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977) Foundations of the Portuguese Empire, 1415–1580. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1979) Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
, and (2012) Land Governance in Brazil: A Geo-Historical Review of Land Governance in Brazil. Framing the Debate Series No. 2. Rome: International Land Coalition. Available at: http://www.americalatina.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/FramingtheDebateBrazil_0.pdf.Google Scholar
(1987) ‘Coffee Planters, Politics and Development in Brazil’. Latin American Research Review, 22(3), 69–90.Google Scholar
(1999) ‘Aventuras y desventuras del gobierno señorial en Brasil’. In , and (eds.) Localización: Para una historia de América, Vol. II. Mexico: El Colegio de México, 198–265.Google Scholar
and (1968) A History of Latin America, From the Beginnings to the Present. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
(1972) ‘The Donatary Captaincy in Perspective: Portuguese Backgrounds to the Settlement of Brazil’. The Hispanic American Historical Review, 52(2), 203–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987) ‘Portuguese Settlement, 1500–1580’. In (ed.) Colonial Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–38.Google Scholar
(2009) Revolution! South America and the Rise of the New Left. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2011) ‘WikiLeaks: Feudal Social Relations in the Brazilian Countryside’. Huffington Post, 3 March. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nikolas-kozloff/wikileaks-feudal-social-r_b_830400.html
(2007) ‘At the Crossroads: Justus Lipsius and the Early Modern Development of International Law’. Leiden Journal of International Law, 20(1), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2010) ‘Privateers of the North Sea: At World's End’. In and (eds.) Mercenaries, Pirates, Bandits and Empires: Private Violence in Historical Context. New York: Columbia University Press, 55–82.Google Scholar
and (1983) Early Latin America: A History of Colonial Spanish America and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1971) ‘Existence et persistance d'un régime féodal ou seigneurial au Brésil’. In L'abolition de la “féodalité” dans le monde occidental [actes du colloque international], Toulouse, 12–16 November 1968. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
(2009) Direito à terra no Brasil: a gestação do conflito 1795–1824. São Paulo: Alameda Casa Editorial.Google Scholar
(2013) ‘Classic Works of Brazil's New Rural History: Feudalism and the Latifundio in the Interpretations of the Left (1940/1964)’. Historia Critica, 51, 121–44.Google Scholar
and (2011) The European Struggle to Settle North America: Colonizing Attempts by England, France and Spain, 1521–1608. Jefferson: McFarland.Google Scholar
(1969) The Colonial Background of Modern Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1969) ‘Land Tenure in Sicily in the First Century BC’. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 18(5), 545–56.Google Scholar
(1946) ‘Sesmarias medievais portuguesas’. Dissertation, University of Lisbon.
(2008) ‘Neofeudal Aspects of Brazil's Public Security’. In and (eds.) Comparative Policing: The Struggle for Democratization. London: Sage, 61–96.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Four Main Theories of Development: Modernization, Dependency, World-System, and Globalization’. Nómadas: Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas, 4(2), 109–24.Google Scholar
and (2007) ‘Liberal Hubris? Virtual Peace in Cambodia’. Security Dialogue, 38(1), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) ‘Introduction’. In and (eds.) Constructing Early Modern Empires: Proprietary Ventures in the Atlantic World, 1500–1750. Leiden: Brill, 1–20.Google Scholar
(1998) The Portuguese Empire, 1415–1808: A World on the Move. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) ‘Avatars of Eurocentrism in the Critique of the Liberal Peace’. Security Dialogue, 44(3), 259–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) As capitanias do Brasil. Antecedentes, desenvolvimento, e extinção de un fenomeno atlantico. Lisbon: Comissão Nacional para as Comemorações dos Descobrimentos Portugueses.Google Scholar
(1996) Terras devolutas e latifundio: efeitos da lei de 1850. Campinas: Editoria da Unicamp.Google Scholar
(1954) Précédents mediévaux de la colonisation en Amérique. Mexico: Instituto Panamericano de geografía e historia.Google Scholar
(2011) ‘Rural Heritage of Early Brazilian Industrialists: its Impact on Managerial Orientation’. Brazilian Administration Review, 8(1), 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967) ‘Latifundia: A Critical Review of the Evidence on Large Estates in Italy and Sicily up to the End of the First Century AD’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 14, 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by