Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: January 2013

2 - A rather dull person: personality as traits and factors

from Part I - The surface
Summary

He was a bit slow and not very alert. He seemed quite shy and not very confident.

Lazy. Easily dominated. Apathetic.

Pleasant though careless. Untidy. Little personal pride. Tendency towards under-achievement. Dull voice, dull personality.

These comments were made by college students after they had all watched the same video recording of an unemployed teenager. The great majority, more than nine out of 10, used words like ‘dull’, ‘pleasant’, ‘weak-willed’ to describe him, often qualified by ‘fairly’, ‘rather’, ‘not very’, etc. A few restricted themselves to superficial comments like ‘untidy’, ‘good looking’, ‘interested in fishing’, while a few tried to draw together different aspects: ‘A lost person, with no ambition, because he has never been directed’ or ‘fairly cheerful, but hides an underlying nervousness’.

Personality Traits

Words that attribute dispositions to people are trait names, and have been used to describe personality for thousands of years. Some derive from classical Greek – athletic, barbarous – or Latin – cautious, devious. Some refer to heavenly bodies supposed to direct behaviour – saturnine, jovial, or lunatic. Some traits immortalise individuals whose behaviour was particularly striking – napoleonic, sadistic, or chauvinist. Some traits’ meanings have changed over time. For example, effete originally meant having just borne young, then worn out by bearing young, and now means simply lacking in vigour and energy.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Levels of Personality
  • Online ISBN: 9781139108140
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108140
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Key references
Allport (1928) describes a very early questionnaire measure of personality.
Allport (1961) sets out his trait account of personality.
Block (1995) questions the contribution of factor analysis, and offers a critical alternative account of the history and value of the FFM.
Burton (1963) factor-analyses the data of Hartshorne and May honesty test data.
Cattell (1946) Cattell's account of the first discovery of his 16-factor model.
Raad, De et al. (2010) describes lexical analysis of personality terms in 10 languages.
Hartshorne and May (1928) describe the honesty test battery of the Character Education Inquiry.
Lykken (1971) questions the ability of factor analysis to discover the true structure of personality, and presents his factor analysis of road tests for cars.
McAdams (1991) criticises the five-factor model as the psychology of the stranger.
McCrae et al. (2005) present data on the five-factor model in 50 cultures around the world.
Murphy and Davidshoffer (2005) give a review of psychological testing, covering the technicalities of test construction and interpretation, and also a review of major personality tests.
Tupes and Cristal (1992) describe the original ‘discovery’ of the five-factor model.
Zhou et al. (2009) describe a lexical analysis of personality descriptions in Chinese.