Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 39
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Lozano, Cristóbal 2018. The Development of Anaphora Resolution at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Pronominal Subjects in Greek Learners of Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 411.

    White, Lydia 2018. Bilingual Cognition and Language. Vol. 54, Issue. , p. 57.

    Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso and Sainzmaza-Lecanda, Lorena 2017. Bilingualism effects in Basque Subject Pronoun Expression. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism,

    Cook, Vivian 2017. The Handbook of Linguistics. p. 557.

    Zyzik, Eve 2017. Subject expression in L2 Spanish: Convergence of generative and usage-based perspectives?. Second Language Research, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 33.

    Clements, Maria and Domínguez, Laura 2017. Reexamining the acquisition of null subject pronouns in a second language. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 33.

    Alonso, Jorge González and Rothman, Jason 2017. Coming of age in L3 initial stages transfer models: Deriving developmental predictions and looking towards the future. International Journal of Bilingualism, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 683.

    Marcelino, Marcello 2017. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World. Vol. 13, Issue. , p. 123.

    Koike, Dale and Witte, Jennifer 2016. Spanish Learner Corpus Research. Vol. 78, Issue. , p. 169.

    Escutia López, Marciano 2016. L2 Spanish preverbal ‘se’ in analysis and production data. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 30.

    White, Lydia 2016. Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters. Vol. 51, Issue. , p. 17.

    Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet 2016. Developmental Asynchrony in the Acquisition of Subject Properties in Child L2 English and Spanish. Language Acquisition, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 387.

    Cuza, Alejandro and Frank, Joshua 2015. On the role of experience and age-related effects: Evidence from the Spanish CP. Second Language Research, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Liceras, Juana M. and Alba de la Fuente, Anahí 2015. The Acquisition of Spanish in Understudied Language Pairings. Vol. 3, Issue. , p. 329.

    Prentza, Alexandra I. 2014. Can Greek Learners Acquire the Overt Subject Property of English? A Pilot Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 4, Issue. 9,

    Rothman, Jason and Pascual y Cabo, Diego 2013. The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition. p. 46.

    Cuza, Alejandro 2013. Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax proper: Interrogative subject–verb inversion in heritage Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 71.

    Ballester, Elisabet Pladevall 2013. Adult instructed SLA of English subject properties. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, Vol. 58, Issue. 03, p. 465.

    Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa and Thomas, Danielle 2013. The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition. p. 423.

    Lubbers Quesada, Margaret 2013. The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition. p. 253.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1989
  • Online publication date: October 2012

Chapter 5 - On some properties of the “pro-drop” parameter: looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish

Summary

Introduction

The parameterized model of acquisition proposed by Chomsky (1981, 1982) has served as the theoretical framework for a number of studies in the field of second language acquisition, of which Flynn (1987), Phinney (1987), and White (1988) are some recent examples. One of the aims of this research is to find out whether the acquisition device that operates in first language (L1) acquisition continues to operate in the case of second language (L2) acquisition. If that were the case, both L1 and L2 learners would be supposed to set a number of parameters according to the options permitted by Universal Grammar (UG). The question then is whether L2 learners start with their L1 setting of a given parameter and eventually reset it to the L2 option or whether the L1 setting does not play a role in the acquisition process. In other words, we face the traditional problem of the role of the mother tongue in L2 acquisition, but in parameterized terms.

Closely linked to this parametric view of acquisition is the theory of markedness (Chomsky 1981, 1986), which differentiates core from peripheral grammar. Core grammar is the grammar that is determined by fixing the parameters of UG in one of the permitted ways. Peripheral grammar is the set of marked elements and constructions that are outside of core grammar, but still constitute what is actually represented in the mind of an individual. According to the theory of markedness, learners project the core grammar of their language on the basis to the principles and parameters of UG.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition
  • Online ISBN: 9781139524544
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524544
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×