Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:52:11.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VIII - Financial, economic, social and other internal affairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Get access

Summary

The EU budget

A brief history of the EU budget

The rules governing the adoption of the EU budget have been modified a number of times. Originally, the 1957 Rome Treaty gave budgetary power exclusively to the Council (Article 203 of the original EEC Treaty). The European Parliament progressively obtained more powers.

For nearly thirty-five years, the procedure for the adoption of the annual budget has always respected the following lines: the European Parliament and the Council are seized by a draft budget tabled by the Commission. The procedure is subject to a timetable fixed by the Treaty. The budget is to be approved by the Council and to be finally decided by the European Parliament. The Council votes by a QMV specific to cases where the Council does not act on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, but on the basis of another act (a draft, a recommendation, etc.). In such situations, unanimity is not required in the Council to change the proposal of the Commission (Article 250(1) TEC). Since the early 1970s, the European Parliament had obtained a right of codecision, and even the last word on so-called ‘non-compulsory’ expenditure. For its part, the Council kept the last word on the so-called ‘compulsory’ expenditure (mainly for the common agriculture policy).

On this basis, in the early years of the EC the negotiations between the European Parliament and the Council, or rather the fights about powers more than about figures, were taking place annually in lengthy sessions which frequently lasted overnight.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Lisbon Treaty
A Legal and Political Analysis
, pp. 288 - 323
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Potteau, A., ‘Les finances publiques de l'Union européenne en 2007’ (2009) 45(1) Revue trimestrielle de Droit européen105Google Scholar
Bearce, D. H., ‘EMU: The Last Stand for the Policy Convergence Hypothesis?’ (2009) Journal of European Public Policy

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×