Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:36:55.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I - The origins and birth of the Lisbon Treaty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Get access

Summary

The process that led to the establishment of the European Union

The point of departure was the 1951 Paris Treaty, by which the six founding Member States established the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC). They then adopted the Rome Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC) and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC or Euratom), in 1957.

That was the beginning of the process which led to the establishment of the European Union (EU). Since then, and before the Lisbon Treaty, the original Rome Treaty has been modified by a number of successive amending treaties: the most important ones came into effect in 1987 (the Single European Act), in 1993 (the Maastricht Treaty), in 1999 (the Amsterdam Treaty) and in 2003 (the Nice Treaty).

The 1957 Rome Treaty (signed on 25 March 1957), which entered into force on 1 January 1958, established the EEC. The aim was to create a customs union, flanked by a common agricultural policy and by co-operation in other areas, in order to try and build a ‘common market’. The Council, composed of ministers representing the government of each Member State, took all the important decisions on the basis of proposals from the Commission, mostly on the basis of unanimity, sometimes consulting a Parliamentary Assembly composed of members delegated by the national parliaments of the Member States. It was decided later on (in 1976) that the members of this assembly would be elected by direct universal suffrage.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Lisbon Treaty
A Legal and Political Analysis
, pp. 7 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Magnette, P. and Nicolaïdis, K., ‘The European Convention: Bargaining in the Shadow of Rhetoric’ (2004) 27 West European Politics381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, G. and Keller-Noëllet, J., The European Constitution: Its Origins, Negotiation and Meaning (London: John Harper Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
Jarlebring, J., ‘Taking Stock of the European Convention: What Added Value Does the Convention Bring to the Process of Treaty Revision?’ (2003) 4 German Law Journal785Google Scholar
Norman, P., The Accidental Constitution: The Making of Europe's Constitutional Treaty (Brussels: EuroComment, 2005)Google Scholar
The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference’ (1995) 20 European Law Review235
Does the European Union Have a Constitution? Does It Need One?’ (1999) 6 European Law Review557
Piris, J.-C., ‘The European Union: Towards a New Form of Federalism?’, in Fedtke, J. and Markesinis, B. (eds.), Patterns of Regionalism and Federalism, The Clifford Chance Lectures, Vol. 8 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006), 69, at 85Google Scholar
Cini, M., European Union Politics, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Roux, J., ‘Le Conseil constitutionnel et le contrôle de constitutionnalité du Traité de Lisbonne: bis repetita’, (2008) 49(1) Revue Trimestrielle de Droit européenGoogle Scholar
Le Traité constitutionnel pour l'Europe: une analyse juridique (Brussels: Bruylant, 2006), Annex 2, 299–308
Barrington, R., ‘Was Holding a Referendum on Lisbon Treaty Really Necessary?’, Opinion, Irish Times, 11 July 2008
Pech, L., ‘Le référendum en Irlande pour ratifier les traités européens: obligatoire ou coutumier?’, Questions d'Europe no. 115, Fondation Robert Schuman, 28 October 2008
Barrett, G., ‘Building a Swiss Chalet in an Irish Landscape? Referendums on European Union Treaties in Ireland and the Impact of Supreme Court Jurisprudence’ (2009) 5 European Constitutional Law Review32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryborg, O. Vigant, Det utoenkelige: NEJ…! (Denmark: Informations Forlag, 1998)Google Scholar
Kuijper, P. J., ‘The Second Second Irish Referendum: Finally a Fair Choice’, (2009) 36(2) Legal Issues of Economic Integration101Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×