Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-7mr9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T13:30:46.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Role of Lithic Raw Material Availability and Quality in Determining Tool Kit Size, Tool Function, and Degree of Retouch: A Case Study from Skink Rockshelter (46NI445), West Virginia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

By
Douglas H. MacDonald
Edited by
William Andrefsky, Jr
William Andrefsky, Jr
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Analysis of lithic artifact data from Skink Rockshelter (44NI445) in central West Virginia indicates that stone quality and availability were important in determining how Native Americans differentially utilized tools at the site. In turn, tool function influenced lithic raw material selection. Although local Kanawha chert was clearly preferred for projectile point and biface manufacture, nonlocal Upper Mercer chert was preferred for flake tool use. Skink Rockshelter lithic data do not support the original hypothesis of the paper, that expedient flake tool use would increase at the expense of curated tools in the Kanawha chert primary source area. Instead, individuals curated the comparatively high-quality Upper Mercer chert stone tools to the site and continued to use and retouch them, rather than replace them with tools produced from the inferior, but abundant, Kanawha chert. Curation of Upper Mercer flake tools, as well as projectile points, resulted in their markedly reduced sizes and higher hafted biface reduction index (HRI) measures compared to the local Kanawha chert tools.

INTRODUCTION

Although overlooked in most prior studies, retouch of stone tools is an important component of the wider technological organization strategy of mobile hunter–gatherers. Even though retouch is the main focus of this paper, the ultimate goal is to better understand the means by which hunter–gatherers achieved success in life with the help of stone.

Type
Chapter
Information
Lithic Technology
Measures of Production, Use and Curation
 , pp. 216 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andrefsky, William Jr. 1994a. Raw Material Availability and the Organization of Technology. American Antiquity 59(1):21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrefsky, William Jr. 1994b. The Geological Occurrence of Lithic Material and Stone Tool Production Strategies. Geoarchaeology 9(5):375–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrefsky, William Jr. 2006. Experimental and Archaeological Verification of an Index of Retouch for Hafted Bifaces. American Antiquity 71:743–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, Douglas B. 1986. Technological Efficiency and Tool Curation. American Antiquity 51(1):38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1979. Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35:255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1983. Long Term Land Use Patterns: Some Implications for Archaeology. In Lulu Linear Punctuated: Essays in Honor of George Irving Quimby, edited by Dunnell, R. C. and Grayson, D. K., pp. 27–53. Museum of Anthropology Anthropological Papers No. 72. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Brashler, J. G., and Lesser, W. H.. 1990. Lithic Materials and Their Distribution in the West Virginia Highlands. In Upland Archaeology in the East: Symposium IV, pp. 193–207. CRM Report 92–1. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Hofman, Jack L., Amick, Daniel S., and Rose, R. O.. 1990. Shifting Sands: Folsom–Midland Assemblage from a Campsite in Western Texas. Plains Anthropologist 33:337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagelmacher, Mike L. 2000. Ohio Cherts of Archaeological Interest. Unpublished manuscript on file at GAI Consultants, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
MacDonald, Douglas H. 1999. Modeling Folsom Mobility, Mating Strategies, and Technological Organization in the Northern Plains. Plains Anthropologist 44(168):141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Douglas H. 2003. Phase III Archaeological Investigations at Skink Rockshelter (46NI445), Nicholas County, West Virginia. Report submitted to Alex Energy, Summersville, West Virginia.
MacDonald, Douglas H., and Cremeens, David L.. 2005. Holocene Lithic Raw Material Use at Skink Rockshelter (46NI445), Nicholas County, West Virginia. In Upland Archaeology in the East, Symposia VIII and IX, edited by Nash, Carole L. and Barber, Michael B., pp. 133–72. Archaeological Society of Virginia Special Publication 38–7.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Douglas H., and Hewlett, Barry S.. 1999. Reproductive Interests and Forager Mobility. Current Anthropology 40(4):501–23.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Douglas H., Lothrop, Jonathan C., Cremeens, David L., and Munford, Barbara A.. 2006. Holocene Land-Use, Settlement Patterns, and Lithic Raw Material Use in Central West Virginia. Archaeology of Eastern North America 34:121–40.Google Scholar
Mandryk, Carole A. S. 1993. Hunter–Gatherer Social Costs and the Nonviability of Submarginal Environments. Journal of Anthropological Research 49:39–71.Google Scholar
Nelson, Margaret C. 1991. The Study of Technological Organization. In Archaeological Method and Theory, Volume 3, edited by Schiffer, Michael B., pp. 57–100. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Reger, D. B. 1921. West Virginia Geologic Survey, Nicholas County. Charleston, WV.Google Scholar
Reppert, R. S. 1978. Kanawha Chert: Its Occurrence and Extent in West Virginia. Open File Report 96. West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Charleston, WV.
Root, Matthew J., ed. 2000. The Archaeology of the Bobtail Wolf Site. WSU Press, Pullman.
Sampson, C. Garth. 1988. Stylistic Boundaries among Mobile Hunter–Foragers. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Torrence, Robin A. 1989. Retooling: Towards a Behavioral Theory of Stone Tools. In Time, Energy, and Stone Tools, edited by Torrence, Robin A., pp. 57–66. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×