Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:08:27.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nineteen - Problems with the World’s Ecosystems: The Future and Attempts to Mitigate Decline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2023

By
Matt W. Hayward
Edited by
Norman Maclean
Norman Maclean
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

One species – humans – is ultimately responsible for devastating much of the only planet in the cosmos that is known to support life – Earth. Our population has expanded exponentially since the Industrial Revolution and this, along with the resources required to sustain us, is ultimately driving the decline in the condition of the world’s ecosystems. Examples of species threatened by development (residential/commercial), agriculture, energy production and mining, transportation, biological resource use, natural system modification, invasive species, pollution and climate change are provided. Yet there are solutions to these problems and many species and ecosystems have bounced back from the brink of extinction. Provided the general public and politicians have the will to invest sufficiently in conservation, it can be highly successful. This chapter ends by exploring the variety of ways that humanity can use to improve the status of the world’s ecosystems.

Keywords

ConservationCosta RicaProtected areasZoosBotanical gardensAquariaVultureDiclofenac
Type
Chapter
Information
The Living Planet
The State of the World's Wildlife
 , pp. 349 - 367
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, R. (2004) Baiting operations: Western Shield review – February 2003. Conserv Sci W Aust 5: 31–50.Google Scholar
Aronson, J., Murcia, C., Kattan, G.H., et al. (2014) The road to confusion is paved with novel ecosystem labels: a reply to Hobbs et al. Trends Ecol Evol 29: 645–646.Google Scholar
Barichievy, C., Munro, L., Clinning, G., et al. (2017) Do armed field-rangers deter rhino poachers? An empirical analysis. Biol Conserv 209: 554–560.Google Scholar
Barnosky, A.D., Koch, P.L., Feranec, R.S., et al. (2004) Assessing the causes of late Pleistocene extinctions on the continents. Science 306: 70–75.Google Scholar
Benayas, J.M.R., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A., et al. (2009) Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325: 1121–1124.Google Scholar
Brooks, T.M., Mittermeier, R.A., da Fonseca, G.A.B., et al. (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313: 58–61.Google Scholar
Brooks, T.M., Wright, S.J. and Sheil, D. (2009) Evaluating the success of conservation actions in safeguarding tropical forest biodiversity. Conserv Biol 23: 1448–1457.Google Scholar
Burbidge, A.A. and McKenzie, N.L. (1989) Patterns in the modern decline of Western Australia’s vertebrate fauna: causes and conservation implications. Biol Conserv 50: 143–198.Google Scholar
Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M.J., Collen, B., et al. (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168.Google Scholar
Chapron, G., Kaczensky, P., Linnell, J.D., et al. (2014) Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346: 1517–1519.Google Scholar
Clarke, R.H., Gordon, I.R. and Clarke, M.F. (2001) Intraspecific phenotypic variability in the black-eared miner (Manorina melanotis); human-facilitated introgression and the consequences for an endangered taxon. Biol Conserv 99: 145–155.Google Scholar
Crisp, H. and Moseby, K.E. (2010) One-way gates: initial trial of a potential tool for preventing overpopulation within fenced reserves. Ecol Manag Restor 11: 139–141.Google Scholar
Dade, M., Pauli, N. and Mitchell, N. (2014) Mapping a new future: using spatial multiple criteria analysis to identify novel habitats for assisted colonization of endangered species. Animal Conserv 17: 4–17.Google Scholar
Diana, J.S. (2009) Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. BioScience 59: 27–38.Google Scholar
Du Puy, D.J., Labat, J.-N., Rabevohitra, R. et al. (2002) The Leguminosae of Madagascar. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., Kretz, D., Wegmann, M., et al. (2014) Oil in the Sahara: mapping anthropogenic threats to Saharan biodiversity from space. Phil Trans Royal Soc B 369: 20130191.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. and Ehrlich, A.H. (2013) Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proc Royal Soc London B 280: 1–9.Google Scholar
Faurby, S. and Svenning, J. C. (2015) Historic and prehistoric human-driven extinctions have reshaped global mammal diversity patterns. Divers Distrib 21(10): 1155–1166.Google Scholar
Francis, C.D., Ortega, C.P. and Cruz, A. (2009) Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. Curr Biol 19: 1415–1419.Google Scholar
Gillingham, S. and Lee, P.C. (1999) The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environ Conserv 26: 218–228.Google Scholar
Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R. Crute, I.R., et al. (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812–818.Google Scholar
Goettsch, B., Hilton-Taylor, C., Cruz-Piñón, G. et al. (2015) High proportion of cactus species threatened with extinction. Nat Plants 1: 15142.Google Scholar
Gunawardena, M. and Rowan, J. (2005) Economic valuation of a mangrove ecosystem threatened by shrimp aquaculture in Sri Lanka. Environ Manag 36: 535–550.Google Scholar
Gynther, I., Waller, N. and Leung, L. (2016) Confirmation of the extinction of the Bramble Cay melomys Melomys rubicola on Bramble Cay, Torres Strait: results and conclusions from a comprehensive survey in August–September 2014. Unpublished report to the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
Hansen, B. and Richardson, A.M. (2007) A revision of the Tasmanian endemic freshwater crayfish genus Parastacoides (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae). Invert Syst 20: 713–769.Google Scholar
Hayward, M. W. (2011) Using the IUCN Red List to determine effective conservation strategies. Biodivers Conserv 20: 2563–2573.Google Scholar
Hayward, M.W. and Kerley, G.I.H. (2009) Fencing for conservation: restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Biol Conserv 142: 1–13.Google Scholar
Hayward, M.W., Callen, A., Allen, B.L., et al. (2019) Deconstructing compassionate conservation. Conserv Biol 33: 760–768.Google Scholar
Hayward, M.W., de Tores, P.J. and Banks, P.B. (2005) Habitat use of the quokka Setonix brachyurus (Macropodidae: Marsupialia) in the northern jarrah forest of Australia. J Mammal 86: 683–688.Google Scholar
Hayward, M.W., Meyer, N.F.V., Balkenhol, N. et al. (2022) Intergenerational inequity: stealing the joy and benefits of nature from our children. Front Ecol Evol 10. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.830830.Google Scholar
Hayward, M.W., Ripple, W.J., Kerley, G.I.H., et al. (2018) Neocolonial conservation: Is moving rhinos to Australia conservation or intellectual property loss. Conserv Lett 11: e12354.Google Scholar
Hayward, M.W., Ward-Fear, G., L’Hotellier, F., et al. (2016) Could biodiversity loss have increased Australia’s bushfire threat? Animal Conserv 19: 490–497.Google Scholar
Hobbs, H.H. and Franz, R. (1991) A new troglobitic crayfish, Procambarus (Lonnbergius) morrisi, (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from Florida. Proc Biol Soc Washington 104: 55–63.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M., Hilton-Taylor, C., Angulo, A., et al. (2010) The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330: 1503–1509.Google Scholar
Innes, J., Burns, B., Sanders, A., et al. (2015) The impact of private sanctuary networks on reintroduction programmes in Australia and New Zealand. In: Armstrong, D.P., Hayward, M.W., Moro, D. and Seddon, P.J. (Eds.), Reintroduction Biology in Australia and New Zealand. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Irwin, A. (2017) The dark side of light: how artificial lighting is harming the natural world. Nature 553: 7688.Google Scholar
IUCN. (1980) Threatened Deer: Proceedings of a Working Meeting of the Deer Specialist Group. Morges, Switzerland: IUCN Deer Specialist Group, 46.Google Scholar
IUCN. (2015) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
IUCN. (2022) 2022 Red List of Threatened Species. www.redlist.org (accessed October 2022).Google Scholar
Kareiva, P. and Marvier, M. (2012) What is conservation science? BioScience 62: 962–969.Google Scholar
Kerley, G.I.H., Kowalczyk, R. and Cromsigt, J.P.G.M. (2012) Conservation implications of the refugee species concept and the European bison: king of the forest or refugee in a marginal habitat? Ecography 35: 519–529.Google Scholar
Kidd, K.A., Blanchfield, P.J., Mills, K.H., et al. (2007) Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 8897–8901.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, A.M., Briggs, C.J. and Daszak, P. (2010) The ecology and impact of chytridiomycosis: an emerging disease of amphibians. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 109–118.Google Scholar
Kleinschroth, F., Healey, J.R., Gourlet-Fleury, S., et al. (2017) Effects of logging on roadless space in intact forest landscapes of the Congo Basin. Conserv Biol 31: 469–480.Google Scholar
Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Gray, J., et al. (2018) The ‘future of conservation’ debate: Defending ecocentrism and the Nature Needs Half movement. Biol Conserv 217: 140–148.Google Scholar
LaBastille, A. (1983) Drastic decline in Guatemala’s giant pied-billed grebe population. Environ Conserv 10: 346–348.Google Scholar
Larsen, R.J., Boegler, K.A., Genoways, H.H., et al. (2007)Mist netting bias, species accumulation curves, and the rediscovery of two bats on Montserrat (Lesser Antilles). Acta Chiropterol 9: 423–435.Google Scholar
Lenhardt, M., Jaric, I., Kalauzi, A. et al. (2006) Assessment of extinction risk and reasons for decline in sturgeon. Biodivers Conserv 15: 1967–1976.Google Scholar
Lindsey, P.A., Chapron, G., Petracca, L.S., et al. (2017) Relative efforts of countries to conserve the World’s megafauna. Glob Ecol Conserv 10: 243–252.Google Scholar
Linnell, J.D.C., Trouwborst, A., Boitani, L., et al. (2016) Border security fencing and wildlife: the end of the transboundary paradigm in Eurasia? PLoS Biol 14: e1002483.Google Scholar
Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S., et al. (2004) 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Gland, Switzerland: Invasive Species Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union (IUCN).Google Scholar
Machovina, B., Feeley, K.J. and Ripple, W.J. (2015) Biodiversity conservation: the key is reducing meat consumption. Sci Total Environ 536: 419–431.Google Scholar
McCallum, H., Tompkins, D.M., Jones, M., et al. (2007) Distribution and impacts of Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease. EcoHealth 4: 318.Google Scholar
Miller, J.R. (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 430–434.Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2015) Catastrophe and hope for the saiga. Oryx 49: 577.Google Scholar
Moore, J.F., Mulindahabi, F., Masozera, M.K., et al. (2017) Are ranger patrols effective in reducing poaching-related threats in protected areas? J Appl Ecol 55: 99–107.Google Scholar
Naylor, R.L., Goldburg, R.J., Mooney, H., et al. (1998) Nature’s subsidies to shrimp and salmon farming. Science 282: 883–884.Google Scholar
Nilsen, E.B., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Schofield, L., et al. (2007) Wolf reintroduction to Scotland: public attitudes and consequences for red deer management. Proc Royal Soc London B 274: 995–1002.Google Scholar
Noss, R., Nash, R., Paquet, P., et al. (2013) Humanity’s domination of nature is part of the problem: a response to Kareiva and Marvier. BioScience 63: 241–242.Google Scholar
Ogada, D.L., Torchin, M.E., Kinnaird, M.F., et al. (2012) Effects of vulture declines on facultative scavengers and potential implications for mammalian disease transmission. Conserv Biol 26: 453–460.Google Scholar
Owens, B. (2017) Behind New Zealand’s wild plan to purge all pests. Nature 541: 148.Google Scholar
Parmesan, C. (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 637–669.Google Scholar
Piccinini, A. and Loseby, M. (2001) Agricultural Policies in Europe and the USA: Farmers Between Subsidies and the Market. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. and Morrison, D. (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52: 273–288.Google Scholar
Plowright, W. (1982) The effects of rinderpest and rinderpest control on wildlife in Africa. In: Symposia of the Zoological Society of London. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ramp, D., Ben-Ami, D., Boom, K., et al. (2013) Compassionate Conservation: A Paradigm Shift for Wildlife Management in Australasia. Ignoring Nature No More: The Case for Compassionate Conservation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rewilding Europe. (2012) Rewilding Europe. Niljmegen, the Netherlands: ARK, Conservation Capital, WWF, Wild Wonders of Europe. https://rewildingeurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Rewilding-Europe-Brochure-2012.pdf (accessed October 2022).Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J.P., Keith, D.A., Rodríguez-Clark, K.M., et al. (2015) A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria. Phil Trans Royal Soc B 370: 20140003.Google Scholar
Santoyo-Castelazo, E. and Azapagic, A. (2014) Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. J Cleaner Prod 80: 119–138.Google Scholar
Shanahan, D.F., Bush, R., Gaston, K.J., et al. (2016) Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Sci Rep 6: 28551.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. and Edinborough, K. (2007) Prehistoric population history: from the Late Glacial to the Late Neolithic in Central and Northern Europe. J Archaeol Sci 34: 1339–1345.Google Scholar
Simón, M.A., Gil-Sánchez, J.M., Ruiz, G., et al. (2012) Reverse of the decline of the endangered Iberian lynx. Conserv Biol 26: 731–736.Google Scholar
Soulé, M.E. (2013) The ‘New Conservation’. Conserv Biol 27: 895–897.Google Scholar
Spash, C.L. (2015) Bulldozing biodiversity: the economics of offsets and trading-in Nature. Biol Conserv 192: 541–551.Google Scholar
Stebbing, A. and Spies-Butcher, B. (2016) The decline of a homeowning society? Asset-based welfare, retirement and intergenerational equity in Australia. Housing Stud 31: 190–207.Google Scholar
Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Wanger, T.C., et al. (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151: 53–59.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N.B., Deumling, D., et al. (2002) Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 9266–9271.Google Scholar
Waldron, A., Mooers, A.O., Miller, D.C., et al. (2013) Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:12144–12148.Google Scholar
Webb, J.K., Harlow, P.S. and Pike, D.A. (2014) Australian reptiles and their conservation. In: Stow, A., Maclean, N. and Holwell, G.I. (Eds.), Austral Ark: The State of Wildlife in Australia and New Zealand. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wich, S.A., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Kühl, H.S., et al. (2014) Will oil palm’s homecoming spell doom for Africa’s great apes? Curr Biol 24: 1659–1663.Google Scholar
Worm, B., Barbier, E.B., Beaumont, N., et al. (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787–790.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×