The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora

Michael Bowman; Peter Davies; Catherine Redgwell

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511975301.017

15 - The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2011

Michael Bowman ,

Peter Davies and

Catherine Redgwell

Show author details

Michael Bowman: Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Peter Davies: Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Catherine Redgwell: Affiliation:
University College London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Background

International trade in wildlife is big business, ‘estimated to be worth billions of dollars and to include hundreds of millions of plant and animal specimens’. The trade goes back for centuries, but there was a dramatic increase in its volume during the 1960s and 1970s. For example, by the late 1960s a staggering 5–10 million crocodilian skins were entering international trade each year. International wildlife trade continues apace today – during 2002 and 2003 the USA alone issued 1,547 permits for imported sport-hunted leopard trophies and 250 permits for sport-hunted elephant trophies. In addition, European Union member states imported ‘six million live birds, 1.6 million live reptiles, around 10 million reptile skins, 21 million orchids and 579 t of sturgeon caviar’ between 1996 and 2002, and the legal trade in 2005 ‘in wildlife products in the EU had an estimated declared import value of EUR93 billion’. Often involvement in wildlife trade can make the difference between a comfortable lifestyle and a basic one; for example, those involved in the collection of marine specimens in Fiji can expect to receive a monthly income of US$425 when compared to the average wage of US$50 per month.

The first demand for controls on the international wildlife trade was made as early as 1911 when Paul Sarasin, a Swiss conservationist, called for restrictions on the import and export of bird feathers because of the effect of the vogue for plumed hats on bird populations.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Lyster's International Wildlife Law , pp. 483 - 534

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975301.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Hepworth, R., ‘The Independent Review of CITES’ (1998) 1 Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy412CrossRef Google Scholar

Reeve, R., ‘1973 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species’ (pp. 134–60), in Ulfstein, G. (ed.), Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control (Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Sand, P. H., ‘Japan's “Research Whaling” in the Antarctic Southern Ocean and the North Pacific Ocean in the Face of the Endangered Species Convention (CITES)’ 2008 17(1) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law56CrossRef Google Scholar

Sand, P. H., ‘Whither CITES? The Evolution of a Treaty Regime in the Borderline of Trade and the Environment’ (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law29CrossRef Google Scholar

Theile, S., Steiner, A. and Kecse-Nagy, K., Expanding Borders: New Challenges for Wildlife Trade Controls in the EU (TRAFFIC, 2004)Google Scholar

Wijnstekers, W., The Evolution of CITES (1973 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, 8th ed., 2005)Google Scholar

(2004) 20(1) TRAFFIC Bulletin4.

Engler, M. and Parry-Jones, R., Opportunity or Threat: The role of the EU in Global Wildlife Trade (TRAFFIC Europe, 2007), p. 6.Google Scholar

Hornblower, M., ‘Noble Sentiments, Sharp Disagreements’, (1979) 81(4) Audubon, p. 111.Google Scholar

Blundell, A. G. and Rodan, B. D., ‘Confusing Controversy with Failure: The Fort Lauderdale Listing Criteria and CITES Appendix I and II Species Proposals’ (2001) 4(1) Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy35CrossRef Google Scholar

Dickson, B., ‘The Precautionary Principle in CITES: A Critical Assessment’ (1999) 39 Natural Resources Journal211.Google Scholar

Milledge, S. and Abdi, M., ‘A Model for Africa – Ethiopia's Efforts to Close Unregulated Domestic Ivory Markets in Addis Ababa’ (2005) 20(3) TRAFFIC Bulletin119Google Scholar

Wijnstekers, W., The Evolution of CITES (1973 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, 7th ed., 2003), p. 80.Google Scholar

Rosser, A. R. and Haywood, M. J., Guidance for CITES Scientific Authorities: Checklist to Assist in Making Non-detriment Findings for Appendix II Exports (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 2002)Google Scholar

,USFederal Register, 48(161), 18 August 1983, pp. 37494–8.

Klemm, C., Guidelines for Legislation to Implement CITES (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 1993), p. 45.Google Scholar

Sea Turtles in Trade (Center for Environmental Education, 1983), pp. 1–14.

(2005) 20(2) Traffic Bulletin85.

(2002) 19(2) Traffic Bulletin2

(2009) 22(2) Traffic Bulletin76.

(2008) 22(1) Traffic Bulletin40.

(2005) 20(2) Traffic Bulletin83.

,USFederal Register, 69(233), 6 December 2004, p. 70379.

,USFederal Register, 46(169), 1 September 1981, p. 43834.

Baker, J. E., ‘A Substantive Theory of the Relative Efficiency of Environmental Treaty Compliance Strategies: The Case of CITES’ (1999) 2(1) Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy1CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.