Aebbtlin, Georg. Anführung Zu der Registratur-Kunst. Ulm: Christian Balthasar Kühnen, 1669.Google Scholar

Andenmatten, Bernard, and Castelnuovo, Guido. “Produzione e conservazione documentarie nel principato sabaudo, XIII–XV secolo.” Bullettino dell’Istituto italiano per il Medio Evo e Archivio Muratoriano 110, 1 (2008), 279–348.Google Scholar

Anmerckungen Uber die Von dem Wienerischen Hof Der schuldigen Auslieferung Des Reichs-Archivs Entgegen gestellete, Und denen öffentlichen Zeitungen einverleibte Einwendungen. N.p., 1742.Google Scholar

Arendt, Max. Die brandenburgische Kanzlei, ihr Urkunden- und Registerwesen unter der Regierung des Kurfürsten Johann (1486–99). Berlin: Blanke, 1913.Google Scholar

Arnold, John H. “Inquisition, Texts and Discourse,” in Bruschi, Caterina and Biller, Peter, eds., Texts and the Repression of Medieval Heresy, 63–80. York: York Medieval Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Assmann, Aleida. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011 [German original 1992].Google Scholar

Assmann, Jan. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011 [German original 1977].Google Scholar

Azevedo, Pedro A. de, and Baião, António. O Arquivo da Torre do Tombo: Sua história, corpos que o compõem e organização. Lisbon: Imprensa Commercial, 1905 [reprinted Lisbon: Horizonte, 1989].Google Scholar

Baldwin, John H. The Government of Philip Augustus: Foundations of French Royal Power in the Middle Ages. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Barisoni, Alberto. Albertini Barisonii episcopi cenetensis de archivis commentarius. Venice: Jo. Baptista Pasqual, 1737.Google Scholar

Baron, Hans. “Leonardo Bruni: ‘Professional Rhetoritician’ or ‘Civic Humanist’?” Past and Present 36 (1967), 21–37.Google Scholar

Barret-Kriegel, Blandine. Jean Mabillon. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988.Google Scholar

Bastian, Jeanette. Owning Memory: How a Caribbean Community Lost Its Archives and Found Its History. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2003.Google Scholar

Bastress-Dukehart, Erica. The Zimmern Chronicle: Nobility, Memory and Self-Representation in Sixteenth-Century Germany. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar

Bauer, Wilhelm. “Das Register- und Konzeptwesen in der Reichskanzlei Maximilians I. bis 1502.” Mitteilungen des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 26 (1905), 247–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baum, Wilhelm. Sigmund der Münzreiche: Zur Geschichte Tirols und der habsburgischen Länder im Spätmittelalter. Bolzano: Verlagsanstalt Athesia, 1987.Google Scholar

Bautier, M. Robert-Henri. “La phase cruciale de l’histoire des archives.” Archivum: Revue Internationale des Archives 18 (1968), 139–49.Google Scholar

Becker, Peter, and Clark, William, eds. Little Tools of Knowledge: Historical Essays on Academic and Bureaucratic Practices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bedos-Rezak, Brigitte. “Towards an Archaeology of the Medieval Charter: Textual Production and Reproduction in Northern France,” in Kosto, Adam and Winroth, Anders, eds. Charters, Cartularies and Archives: The Preservation and Transmission of Documents in the Medieval West, 43–60. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2002.Google Scholar

Beimrohr, Wilfried Das Tiroler Landesarchiv und seine Bestände. Innsbruck: Tiroler Landesarchiv, 2002.Google Scholar

Benecke, Gerhard. Maximilian I (1459–1519): An Analytical Biography. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Walter. Die Zentralbehörden des Herzogtums Württemberg und ihre Beamten 1520–1569, 2 vols. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1972.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Paul. “Du De re diplomatica au Nouveau Traité de diplomatique: réception des textes fondamentales d’une discipline,” in Dom Jean Mabillon, figure majeure de l’Europe des lettres, 605–20. Paris: Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 2010.Google Scholar

Bier, Herrman. Das Urkundenwesen und die Kanzlei der Markgrafen von Brandenburg 1323–1373: I. Teil. Berlin: Bernhard Paul, 1907.Google Scholar

Biller, Peter, Bruschi, Caterina, and Sneddon, Shelagh. Inquisitors and Heretics in Thirteenth-Century Languedoc: Edition and Translation of Toulouse Inquisition Depositions, 1273–1282. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Bittner, Ludwig. Gesamtinventar des Wiener Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchivs, aufgebaut auf der Geschichte des Archivs und seiner Bestände, 5 vols. Vienna: Adolf Holzhausens Nachfolger, 1936–1940.Google Scholar

Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd ed. 1910. http://thelawdictionary.org.Google Scholar

Blair, Ann. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Blouin, Francis X. Jr., and Rosenberg, William G.. Processing the Past: Contesting Authority in History and the Archives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Blouin, Francis X. Jr., and Rosenberg, William G.. eds. Archives, Documentation and the Institutions of Social Memory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, Uta-Renate. “Päpstliche Urkunden, Briefe, und die europäische Öffentlichkeit,” in Herbers, Klaus and Fleisch, Ingo, Erinnerung – Niederschrift – Nutzung: Das Papsttum und die Schriftlichkeit im mittelalterlichen Westeuropa, 11–30. Berlin: De Gruyer, 2011.Google Scholar

Bonifacius, Baldessare. De archivis liber singularis eiusdem praelectiones et ciuilium institutionum epitome. Venice: Io. Petrus Pinellus, 1632.Google Scholar

Born, Lester K. “Baldassare Bonifacio and His Essay De Archivis.” American Archivist 4, 4 (1941), 221–37.Google Scholar

Born, Lester K. ed. “The De Archivis Commentarius of Albertino Barisoni (1587–1667).” Archivalische Zeitschrift 50/51 (1955), 13–22.Google Scholar

Bouchard, Constance B. “Monastic Cartularies: Organizing Eternity,” in Kosto, Adam and Winroth, Anders, eds. Charters, Cartularies and Archives: The Preservation and Transmission of Documents in the Medieval West, 22–32. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2002.Google Scholar

Boutier, Jean. “Étienne Baluze et les ‘Règles générales pour discerner les anciens titres faux d’avec les véritables’,” in Boutier, Jean, ed., Étienne Baluze, 1630–1718: Erudition et pouvoirs dans l’Europe classique, 315–34. Limoges: Pulim, 2008.Google Scholar

Bouza Alvarez, Fernando. Del escribano a la biblioteca: La civilización escrita Europea en la alta edad moderna (siglos XV–XVII). Madrid: Síntesis, 1997.Google Scholar

Brandstetter, Renward. Renward Cysat 1545–1614: Der Begründer der schweizerischen Volkskunde. Lucerne: Buchhandlung Haag, 1909.Google Scholar

Brendecke, Arndt. “Arca, Archivillo, Archive: The Keeping, Use, and Status of Historical Documents about the Spanish Conquista.” Archival Science 10, 3 (2010), 267–83.Google Scholar

Brendecke, Arndt. Imperium and Empirie: Funktionen des Wissens in der spanischen Kolonialherrschaft. Cologne: Böhlau, 2009. [An abridged English translation, The Empirical Empire, trans. Jeremiah Riemer [Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenburg, 2016] appeared after research for this book was complete.]Google Scholar

Brendecke, Arndt. “Papierfluten: Anwachsende Schriftlichkeit als Pluralisierungsfaktor in der Frühen Neuzeit.” Mitteilungen des Sonderforschungbereichs 573 1, 1 (2006), 21–30.Google Scholar

Brendecke, Arndt, Friedrich, Markus, and Friedrich, Susanne, “Information als Kategorie historischer Forschung: Heuristik, Etymologie und Abgrenzung vom Wissensbegriff,” in Brendecke, Arndt, Friedrich, Markus, and Friedrich, Susanne, eds., Information in der Frühen Neuzeit: Status, Bestände, Strategien, 11–44. Berlin: LIT Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar

Brennecke, Adolf. Archivkunde: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie und Geschichte des europäischen Archivwesens, ed. Leesch, Wolfgang. Leipzig: Kohler & Amelang, 1953.Google Scholar

Bresslau, Harry. Handbuch der Urkundenlehre für Deutschland und Italien, 2nd ed. Leipzig: Veit & Comp. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1912–1931.Google Scholar

Brewer, John. The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State, 1688–1783. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1989.Google Scholar

Brincken, Anna-Dorotheé von den. “Tabula Alphabetica: Von den Anfängen alphabetischer Registerarbeiten zu Geschichtswerken (Vincenz von Beauvais OP, Johnnes von Hautfuney, Palinus Minorita OFM),” in Festschrift für Hermann Heimpel zum 70. Geburtstag, 2: 900–23. Göttingen: Max-Planck-Institut für Geschichte, 1972.Google Scholar

Brothman, Brian. “Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of the Archives from Deconstruction.” Archivaria 48 (1999), 64–89.Google Scholar

Brown, Alison. Bartolomeo Scala 1430–1497, Chancellor of Florence: The Humanist as Bureaucrat. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Brown, John Seely, and Duguid, Paul. The Social Life of Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Brown, Warren, Costambeys, Marios, Innes, Matthew, and Kosto, Adam J., eds. Documentary Culture and the Laity in the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Brun, Peter. Schrift und politisches Handeln: Eine “zugeschriebene” Geschichte des Aargaus 1415–1425. Zurich: Chronos, 2006.Google Scholar

Bruschi, Caterina. “‘Magna diligentia est habenda per inquisitorem’: Precautions before Reading Doat 21–26,” in Bruschi, Caterina and Biller, Peter, eds., Texts and the Repression of Medieval Heresy, 81–110. York: York Medieval Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bruschi, Caterina, and Biller, Peter, eds., Texts and the Repression of Medieval Heresy. York: York Medieval Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Brüschweiler, Paul. Die landfriedliche Simultanverhältnisse im Thurgau. Frauenfeld: Huber, 1932.Google Scholar

Bullinger, Heinrich. Reformationsgeschichte nach dem Autographon herausgegeben, vol. 3, ed. Hottinger, J. J. and Vögeli, H. H.. Frauenfeld: Beyel, 1840.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. “Commentary” (on special issue: “Towards a Cultural History of Archives”). Archival Science 7, 4 (2007), 391–97.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Burnett, Amy N., and Campi, Emidio, eds. A Companion to the Swiss Reformation. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar

Burton, Antoinette, ed. Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions and the Writing of History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Mary. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Casanova, Eugenio. Archivistica, 2nd ed. Siena: Lazzeri, 1928.Google Scholar

Castillo Gómez, Antonio. “The Culture of Archives in Spain.” European History Quarterly 46, 3 (2016), 545–67.Google Scholar

Cevolini, Alberto. The Ark of Studies: Thomas Harrison. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Chancelarias Portuguesas: D. Duarte, 3 vols. Lisbon: Centro de Estudos Históricos, Universidade Nova da Lisboa, 1998–2002.Google Scholar

Clanchy, M. T. From Memory to Written Record: England, 1066–1307, 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [first edition 1979].Google Scholar

Cook, Terry. “What Is Past Is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift.” Archivaria 43 (1997), 17–63.Google Scholar

Corens, Liesbeth, Peters, Kate, and Walsham, Alexandra, eds. Archives and Information in the Early Modern World (Proceedings of the British Academy, 212). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Corpus iuris civilis in IIII. partes distinctum …, ed. Godefroy, Dionysius. Lyon: Barthol. Vincentius, 1583.Google Scholar

Cosmar, Carl Wilhelm. Geschichte des Königlich-Preussischen Geheimen Staats- und Kabinettsarchivs bis 1806, ed. Kohnke, Meta. Cologne: Böhlau, 1993.Google Scholar

Costa, Avelino de Jesus da. “A Chancelaria Real Portuguesa e os seus Registos, de 1217 a 1438.” Revista da Faculdade de Letras: Historia (Porto) Ser. II, 13 (1996), 71–101.Google Scholar

Costa, Avelino de Jesus da. “La Chancellerie Royale Portugaise jusq’au milieu du XIIIe siècle.” Revista Portuguesa de História 15 (1975), 143–69.Google Scholar

Costamagna, Giorgio. “I concetti di autenticità e di originalità nel documentazione della Cancelleria genovese nel Medioevo,” in Silagi, Gabriel, ed., Landesherrliche Kanzleien im Spätmittelalter, 2: 485–504. Munich: Arebeo-Gesellschaft, 1984.Google Scholar

Daly, Lloyd W. Contributions to a History of Alphabetization in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Brüssel: Latomus, 1967.Google Scholar

Dames, Nicholas. “The Chapter: A History.”Page-Turner Blog, The New Yorker. www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/chapter-history, October 29, 2014.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine. “The Sciences of the Archive.” Osiris 27 (2012), 156–87.Google Scholar

Davis, Natalie Zemon. Fiction in the Archives: Pardon Tales and Their Tellers in Sixteenth-Century France. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Delaborde, Henri-François. Étude sur la constitution du Trésor des Chartes. Paris: Plon-Nourrit, 1909.Google Scholar

Delaborde, Henri-François. “Les Inventaires du Trésor des Chartes Dressés par Gérard de Montaigu,” in Notices et Extraits des Manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Nationale et autres Biblithèques, vol. 36, pt. 2, 545–98. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale and Librarie C. Klincksieck, 1900.Google Scholar

De la Plaza Bores, Angel. Archivo General de Simancas: Guia del Investigador. Valladolid: Dirección General de Archivos y Bibliotecas, 1952.Google Scholar

Delsalle, Paul. Histoire de l’Archivistique. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 1997.Google Scholar

Demougin, Ségolène, ed. La mémoire perdue: A la recherche des archives oubliées, publiques et privées, de la Rome antique. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 1994.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, tr. Prenowitz, Eric. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996 [French original 1995].Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, tr. Bowlby, Rachel. Paper Machine. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005 [French original 2001].Google Scholar

Deswarte, Sylvia. Les Enluminures de la “Leitura nova”: 1504–1552, étude sur la culture artistique au Portugal au temps de l’Humanisme. Paris: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Centro Cultural Português, 1977.Google Scholar

De Vivo, Filipo. “Archives of Speech: Recording Diplomatic Negotiation in Late Medieval and Early Modern Italy.” European Historical Quarterly 46, 3 (2016), 519–44.Google Scholar

De Vivo, Filipo. “Heart of the State, Site of Tension: The Archival Turn Viewed from Venice, ca. 1400–1700.” www.cairn-int.info/journal-annales-2013-3-page-699.htm [tr. of “Cœur de l’État, lieu de tension: Le tournant archivistique vu de Venise (XV^e–XVII^esiècle),” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 68 (2013), 699–728.]Google Scholar

De Vivo, Filipo. Information and Communication in Venice: Rethinking Early Modern Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

De Vivo, Filipo. “Ordering the Archive in Early Modern Venice (1400–1650).” Archival Science 10, 3 (2010), 231–48.Google Scholar

De Vivo, Filipo, Guidi, Andrea and Silvestri, Alessandro. “Archival Transformations in Early Modern European History.” European Historical Quarterly 46, 3 (2016), 421–34.Google Scholar

De Vivo, Filipo, Guidi, Andrea and Silvestri, Alessandro. eds. Archivi e archivisti in Italia tra medioevo ed etá moderna. Rome: Viella, 2015.Google Scholar

De Vivo, Filipo, Guidi, Andrea and Silvestri, Alessandro. eds. Fonti per la storia degli archivi degli antichi Stati italiani. Rome: Ministero dei beni e delle attività culturali e del turismo, 2016.Google Scholar

De Vivo, Filipo, Pia Donato, Maria, and Müller, Philipp, eds. “Archives and the Writing of History,” special section in Storia della Storiografia 68, 2 (2015).Google Scholar

Dias, João José Alves. Portugal do Renascimento à Crise Dinástica (Nova História de Portugal, vol. 5). Lisbon: Editorial Presença, 1999.Google Scholar

Dinis, António J. Dias, ed. “Relatório do século XVI sobre o Arquivo Nacional da Torre do Tombo.” Anais: Academia Portuguesa da Historia Series II, 17 (1968), 117–58.Google Scholar

Domeisen, Norbert. Bürgermeister Johann Heinrich Waser (1600–1669) als Politiker. Bern/Frankfurt: Herbert Lang/Peter Lang, 1975.Google Scholar

Du Cange, Charles du Fresne sieur. Glossarium mediae et infimae latinitatis. Niort: L. Favre, 1883–1887; http://ducange.enc.sorbonne.fr.Google Scholar

Duranti, Luciana. “Archives as a Place.” Archives & Manuscripts 24, 2 (1996), 242–55.Google Scholar

Duranti, Luciana. “Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science, Part I” Archivaria 28 (1989), 7–27.Google Scholar

Durão, Maria Manuela da Silva. “1471: Um Ano ‘Africano’ no Desembargo de D. Afonso V.” Dissertação de Mestradao, Universidade do Porto, 2002.Google Scholar

Eastwood, Terry. “A Contested Realm: The Nature of Archives and the Orientation of Archival Science,” in Eastwood, Terry and MacNeil, Heather, eds., Currents of Archival Thinking, 2nd ed., 3–28. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited, 2017.Google Scholar

Eastwood, Terry, and MacNeil, Heather, eds. Currents of Archival Thinking, 2nd ed. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited, 2017.Google Scholar

Eckert, Astrid M. The Struggle for the Files: The Western Allies and the Return of German Archives after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. H. “A Europe of Composite Monarchies.” Past and Present No. 137 (1992), 48–71.Google Scholar

Esch, Arnold. “Überlieferungs-Chance und Überlieferungs-Zufall als methodisches Problem des Historikers.” Historische Zeitschrift 240, 3 (1985), 529–70.Google Scholar

Eymerich, Nicolau, and Peña, Francisco. Le manuel des inquisiteurs, ed. Sala-Molins, Louis. Paris: Mouton Éditeur, 1973 [reprint Albin Michel, 2001].Google Scholar

Farge, Arlette, tr. Scott-Railton, Thomas. The Allure of the Archives. New Haven, CT: Yale Unversity Press, 2013 [French original 1989].Google Scholar

Fasolt, Constantin. “The Limits of History: An Exchange.” Historically Speaking 6, 5 (2005), 5–17.Google Scholar

Fellner, Thomas, and Kretschmayr, Heinrich. Die Österreichische Zentralverwaltung, Section I: Von Maximilian I. bis zur Vereinigung der österreichischen und böhmischen Hofkanzlei (1749). Vienna: Adolf Holzhausen, 1907.Google Scholar

Fianu, Kouky, and Guth, DeLloyd, eds. Écrit et Pouvoir dans les Chancelleries Médiévales: Espace Français, espace Anglais. Louvain-La-Neuve: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales, 1997.Google Scholar

Fichtner, Paula Sutter. Ferdinand I of Austria: The Politics of Dynasticism in the Age of the Reformation. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1982.Google Scholar

Foscarini, Fiorella. “Archival Appraisal in Four Paradigms,” in Eastwood, Terry and MacNeil, Heather, eds., Currents of Archival Thinking, 2nd ed., 107–33. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited, 2017.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel, tr. Sheridan Smith, A. M.. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon, 1972 [French original 1969].Google Scholar

Freire, Anselmo Braamcamp. “A Chancelaria de D. Afonso V.” Archivo Histórico Portuguez 2 (1904), 477–87; and 3 (1905), 62–74, 130–54, 212–36, 401–40.Google Scholar

Freitas, Judite Antonieta Gonçalves de. “Chancelarias Régias Quatrocentistas Portuguesas: Produção manuscrita e aproximação político-diplomática.” Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e Sociais (Porto) 6 (2009), 136–50.Google Scholar

Freitas, Judite Antonieta Gonçalves de. “The Royal Chancellery at the End of the Portuguese Middle Ages: Diplomacy and Political Society (1970–2005).” e-Journal of Portuguese History 7, 2 (2009), www.brown.edu/Departments/Portuguese_Brazilian_Studies/ejph/html/issue14/html/jfreitas.html.Google Scholar

Freitas, Judite Antonieta Gonçalves de. “Tradição legal, codificação e práticas institucionais: um relance pelo Poder Régio no Portugal de Quatrocentos.” Revista da Faculdade de Letras: História (Porto), Ser. III, 7 (2006), 51–67.Google Scholar

Frenz, Thomas, “Kanzlei, Registratur und Archiv des Hochstifts Würzburg im 15. Jahrhundert,” in Silagi, Gabriel, ed., Landesherrliche Kanzleien im Spätmittelalter, 2: 39–147. Munich: Arebeo-Gesellschaft, 1984.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Markus. “Das Alte Reich und seine Archive im Spiegel reichspublizistischer und reichrechtlicher Literatur: Ius archivi, gerichtliche Beweiskraft und konfessionspolitische Indienstnahme,” in Rudolph, Harriet and Schlachta, Astrid, eds., Reichsstadt–Reich–Europa: Neue Perspektiven auf den Immerwährenden Reichstag zu Regensburg (1663–1806), 411–29. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner, 2015.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Markus. tr. Dillon, John Noël. The Birth of the Archive: A History of Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2018 [German original 2013].Google Scholar

Friedrich, Markus. tr. Dillon, John Noël. “The Rise of Archival Consciousness in Provincial France: French Feudal Records and Eighteenth-Century Seigneurial Society.” Past and Present Supplement 11 (2016), 49–70.Google Scholar

Fries, Lorenz. Chronik der Bischöfe von Würzburg 742–1495, ed. Grosch, Ulrike. Würzburg: Schöningh, 2002.Google Scholar

Fries, Lorenz. Die Geschichte des Bauernkrieges in Ostfranken, 2 vols., eds. Schäffler, August and Henner, Theodor. Aalen: Scientia, 1978.Google Scholar

Fritsch, Ahasver. Tractatus de iure archivi et cancellarie opera & studio Ahasveri Fritschi iur. doct. consil. Rudelst. Schwb. Jena: Sengenwald, 1664. [Reprinted in Jacob Wencker, ed. Collecta archivi et cancellariae jura: quibus accedunt, de archicancellariis, vicecancellariis, cancellariis ac secretariis virorum clarissimorum commentationes. Strasbourg: Jo. Reinholdi Dulssecker, 1715].Google Scholar

“Fritsch, Ahasver.” Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, 8: 108–09. Leipzig: 1875–1912.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Franz, et al., eds. Lorenz Fries und sein Werk: Bilanz und Einordnung. Würzburg: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh, 2014.Google Scholar

Gallati, Frieda. Die Eidgenossenschaft und der Kaiserhof zur Zeit Ferdinands II. und Ferdinands III. 1619–1657. Zurich: Leemann and Co., 1932.Google Scholar

Geary, Patrick. “Entre gestion et gesta,” in Guyotjeannin, Olivier, Morelle, Laurent, and Parisse, Michel, eds., Les cartulaires: Actes de la Table ronde (Paris, 5–7 Decembre 1991), 13–26. Paris: École des Chartes, 1993.Google Scholar

Geary, Patrick. Phantoms of Remembrance: Memory and Oblivion at the End of the First Millennium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Genicot, Leopold. Les Actes Publics (Typologie des Sources du Moyen Age Occidental, Fasc. 3). Turnhout: Brepols, 1972.Google Scholar

Germon, Bartholomé. De veteribus regum Francorum diplomatibus, et arte secernendi antiqua diplomata vera à falsis, disceptatio. Paris: Jean Anisson, 1703.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. The Nation-State and Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Gilliland, Anne J., McKemmish, Sue, and Lau, Andrew J., eds. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

Given, James. Inquisition and Medieval Society: Power, Discipline, and Resistance in Languedoc. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Glauser, Fritz, et al. Das Staatsarchiv Luzern im Überblick: ein Archivführer. Stuttgart/Luzern: Rex Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Glénisson, Jean. “Les enquêtes administratives en Europe occidentale aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles,” in Paravicini, Werner and Werner, Karl Ferdinand, eds. Histoire Comparée de L’Administration (IV–XVIII Siecles), 17–25. Munich: Artemis Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar

Godefroy, Dionysius. Praxis civilis, ex antiqvis et recentioribvs avthoribvs, germanis, italis, gallis, hispanis, belgis, et aliis, qvi de re practica ex professo, nulla tamen vel confusa methodo, scripserunt, collecta. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Fischer, 1591.Google Scholar

Goeing, Anja-Silvia. Storing, Archiving, Organizing: The Changing Dynamics of Scholarly Information Management in Post-Reformation Zurich. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar

Goody, Jack. The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Goody, Jack. The Power of the Written Tradition. Washington, DC/London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Gordon, Bruce. The Swiss Reformation. Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Gorecki, Piotr. The Text and the World: The Henryków Book, Its Authors, and Their Region, 1160–1310. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Gössi, Anton. “Archivordnungen und Kanzleiregistraturen in Luzern bis ins 18. Jh.” Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Schweizerischer Archivare 27 (1976), 3–25.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. The Footnote: A Curious History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. “Invention of Traditions and Traditions of Invention in Renaissance Europe: The Strange Case of Annius of Viterbo,” in Grafton, Anthony and Blair, Ann, eds., The Transmission of Culture in Early Modern Europe, 8–38. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship. Oxford: Clarendon, 1983.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. What Was History? The Art of History in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony, and Marchand, Suzanne L., eds. Proof and Persuasion in History. Special Issue of History and Theory 33, 4 (1994).Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony, and Most, Glenn W., eds. Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices: A Global Comparative Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony, and Williams, Megan. Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius, and the Library of Caesarea. Cambridge: Belknap, 2008.Google Scholar

Grebe, Marc-André. Akten, Archive, Absolutismus? Das Kronarchiv von Simancas im Herrschaftsgefüge der spanischen Habsburger (1540–1598). Frankfurt a.M.: Veurvert, 2012.Google Scholar

Groebner, Valentin, tr. Kyburz, Mark and Peck, John. Who Are You? Identification, Deception, and Surveillance in Early Modern Europe. New York: Zone Books, 2007 [German original 2004].Google Scholar

Guidi, Andrea. “The Florentine Archives in Transition: Government, Warfare and Communication (1289–1530 ca.).” European Historical Quarterly 46, 3 (2016), 458–79.Google Scholar

Guyotjeannin, Olivier, Morelle, Laurent, and Parisse, Michel, eds. Les cartulaires: Actes de la Table ronde (Paris, 5–7 Decembre 1991). Paris: École des Chartes, 1993.Google Scholar

Guyotjeannin, Olivier, and Potin, Yann. “La Fabrique de la Perpétuité: Le Trésor des Chartes et les Archives du Royaume (XIIIe–XIXe Siècle),” in Anheim, Étienne and Poncet, Olivier, eds., Fabrique des archives, fabrique de l’histoire (Special Issue, Revue de Synthèse, Ser. 5, Vol. 125), 15–46.Google Scholar

Hacke, Daniela. “Zwischen Konflikt und Konsens: Zur politisch-konfessionellen Kultur in der Alten Eidgenossenschaft des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts.” Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 32, 4 (2005), 575–604.Google Scholar

Hageneder, Othmar, and Haidacher, Anton, eds. Die Register Innozenz III. Graz: H. Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1964.Google Scholar

Haidacher, Christoph. “Auf den Spuren des Archivs der Grafen von Görz,” in Sporer-Heis, Claudia, ed., Tirol in seinen alten Grenzen, 123–38. Innsbruck: Wagner, 2008.Google Scholar

Haidacher, Christoph. “Das Schriftgut der drei ‘oberösterreichischen Wesen,’” in Pauser, Josef, Scheutz, Martin, and Winkelbauer, Thomas, eds., Quellenkunde der Habsburgermonarchie (16.–18. Jahrhundert), Ein exemplarisches Handbuch, 205–15. Vienna/Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar

Haidacher, Christoph. Die älteren Tiroler Rechnungsbücher: Analyse und Edition, 3 vols. Innsbruck: Tiroler Landesarchiv, 1993–2008.Google Scholar

Hallam, Elizabeth, and Everard, Judith. Capetian France 987–1328, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Carolyn, et al., eds. Refiguring the Archive. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002.Google Scholar

Hammerstein, Notker. Jus und Historie: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des historischen Denkens an deutschen Universitäten im späten 17. und im 18. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1972.Google Scholar

Handbuch der Schweizer Geschichte, 2 vols. Zurich: Buchverlag Berichthaus, 1972.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Josef. “Amtsbücher: (a) Allgemeine Entwicklung des Amtsbuchwesens,” in Beck, Friedrich and Henning, Eckart, eds., Die archivalische Quellen, mit einer Einführung in die Historischen Hilfswissenschaften, 3rd ed., 40–52. Cologne: Böhlau, 2003.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Collecting Testimony and Parsing Texts in Zurich: Documentary Strategies for Defending Reformed Identities in the Thurgau, 1600–1656,” in Barnes, Robin and Plummer, Marjorie, eds., Ideas and Cultural Margins in Early Modern Germany: Essays in Honor of H. C. Erik Midelfort, 289–305. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “A Comparative Case-Study Approach to Historical Archives in Europe,” in Gilliland, Anne J., McKemmish, Sue, and Lau, Andrew J., eds., Research in the Archival Multiverse, 433–55. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Configuring European Archives: Spaces, Materials and Practices in the Differentiation of Repositories from the Late Middle Ages to 1700.” European History Quarterly 46, 3 (2016), 498–518.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Documents, Archives and Proof around 1700.” Historical Journal 56, 4 (2013), 909–30.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Empire at Home: European Chancellery Practices and the Challenges of Record Keeping for Early Modern Colonial Enterprises,” in Pia Donato, Maria, ed., Pratiques d’archives à l’époque modern: France, mondes coloniaux. Paris: Editions Classiques Garnier, in press.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Fragmented Dominion, Fragmented Churches: The Institutionalization of the Landfrieden in the Thurgau, 1531–1630.” Archive for Reformation History 96 (2005), 117–44.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Knowing Like a State: The Transformation of Political Knowledge in Swiss Archives, 1470–1770.” Journal of Modern History 75, 4 (2003), 745–82.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Mirroring Governance: Archives, Inventories and Political Knowledge in Early Modern Switzerland and Europe.” Archival Science 7 (2007), 317–29.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Spaces in the Archive, Spaces of the Archive: Material, Topographical and Indexical Articulations of Space in Early Modern Chancery Record Management,” in Friedrich, Karin, ed., Opening Spaces: Constructions, Visions and Depictions of Spaces and Boundaries in the Baroque, 2: 505–19. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2014.Google Scholar

Head, Randolph C. “Thinking with the Thurgau: Political Pamphlets from the Villmergerkrieg and the Construction of Biconfessional Politics in Switzerland and Europe” in Ocker, Christopher et al., eds., Politics and Reformations: Communities, Polities, Nations, and Empires: Essays in Honour of Thomas A. Brady, Jr., 239–58. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Heidecker, Karl. “30 June 1047: The End of Charters as Legal Evidence in France?” in Schulte, Petra, Mostert, Marco, and van Renswoude, Irene, eds., Strategies of Writing: Studies on Text and Trust in the Middle Ages, 85–94. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.Google Scholar

Heidecker, Karl. ed. Charters and the Use of the Written Word in Medieval Society. Turnhout: Brepols, 2000.Google Scholar

Heiler, Thomas. Die Würzburger Bischofschronik des Lorenz Fries (Gest. 1550): Studien zum historiographischen Werk eines fürstbischöflichen Sekretärs und Archivars. Würzburg: Verlag F. Schöningh, 2001.Google Scholar

Henny, Sundar. Vom Leib geschrieben: Der Mikrokosmos Zürich und seine Selbstzeugnisse im 17. Jahrhundert. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar

Hentonnen, Pekka. “Looking at Archival Concepts and Practice in the Light of Speech Act Theory,” in Gilliland, Anne J., McKemmish, Sue, and Lau, Andrew J., eds., Research in the Archival Multiverse, 537–56. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

Herzog, Tamar. A Short History of European Law: The Last Two and a Half Millennia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Heuberger, Richard. “Das Urkunden- und Kanzleiwesen der Grafen von Tirol, Herzöge von Kärnten, aus dem Hause Görz.” Mitteilungen des Instituts für österreichische Geschichtsforschung, Ergänzungsband 9 (1915), 51–177, 265–394.Google Scholar

Hiatt, Alfred. “Diplomatic Arts: Hickes against Mabillon in the Republic of Letters.” Journal of the History of Ideas 70, 3 (2009), 351–73.Google Scholar

Hiatt, Alfred. The Making of Medieval Forgeries: False Documents in Fifteenth-Century England. London/Toronto: British Library and University of Toronto Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hildbrand, Thomas. Herrschaft, Schrift und Gedächtnis: Das Kloster Allerheiligen und sein Umgang mit Wissen in Wirtschaft, Recht und Archiv (11.–16. Jahrhundert). Zurich: Chronos, 1996.Google Scholar

Hildbrand, Thomas. “Quellenkritik in der Zeitdimension: Vom Umgang mit Schriftgut. Anmerkungen zur theoretischen Grundlegung einer Analyse von prozesshaft bedeutungvollem Schriftgut mit zwei Beispielen aus der mittelalterlichen Ostschweiz.” Frühmittelalterliche Studien 29 (1995), 349–89.Google Scholar

Hirschler, Konrad. “From Archives to Archival Practice: Rethinking the Preservation of Mamluk Administrative Documents.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 136, 1 (2016), 1–28.Google Scholar

[Hirzel, Samuel]. “Versuch eines Plans zu Eintheilung der gesammelten Urkunden über die Eidgnösische Geschichte.” Verhandlungen der Helvetischen Gesellschaft in Schinznach (1767), 21–34.Google Scholar

Histoire des contestations sur la diplomatique avec l’analise de cet ouvrage composé par le R.P. Dom. Jean Mabillon. Paris: F. Delalune, 1708. [Attributed either to Jacques-Philippe Lallemant (c. 1660–1748) or to Gilles-Bernard Raguet (1668–1748).]Google Scholar

Hochedlinger, Michael. Aktenkunde: Urkunden- und Aktenlehre der Neuzeit. Vienna/Munich: Böhlau Verlag and Oldenbourg Verlag, 2009.Google Scholar

Hochedlinger, Michael. Österreichische Archivgeschichte vom Spätmittelalter bis zum Ende des Papierzeitalters. Vienna/Munich: Böhlau Verlag and Oldenbourg Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar

Horsman, Peter, Ketelaar, Eric, and Thomassen, Theo. “New Respect for the Old Order: The Context of the Dutch Manual.” American Archivist 66 (2003), 249–70.Google Scholar

Im Hof, Ulrich, and de Capitani, François. Die Helvetische Gesellschaft: Spätaufklärung und Vorrevolution in der Schweiz, 2 vols. Frauenfeld/Stuttgart: Huber, 1983.Google Scholar

Iseli, Andrea. Gute Policey: Öffentliche Ordnung in der Frühen Neuzeit. Stuttgart: UTB, 2009.Google Scholar

Jenkinson, Hilary. A Manual of Archive Administration, Including the Problems of War Archives and Archive Making. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1922.Google Scholar

Jenny, Beat Rudolf. “Von Schreiber zu Ritter: Jakob von Ramingen 1510 – nach 1582.” Schriften des Vereins für Geschichte und Naturgeschichte der Baar 26 (1966), 1–66.Google Scholar

Jenny, Rudolf. Das Staatsarchiv Graubünden in landesgeschichtlicher Schau. Chur: Calven-Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar

Johanek, Peter. “Methodisches zur Verbreitung und Bekanntmachung von Gesestzen im Spätmittelalter,” in Paravicini, Werner and Werner, Karl Ferdinand, eds. Histoire Comparée de L’Administration (IV–XVIII Siecles), 88–101. Munich: Artemis Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar

Jucker, Michael. Gesandte, Schreiber, Akten: politische Kommunikation auf eidgenössischen Tagsatzungen im Spätmittelalter. Zurich: Chronos, 2004.Google Scholar

Kafka, Ben. “The Demon of Writing: Paperwork, Public Safety and the Reign of Terror.” Representations 98, 1 (2007), 1–24.Google Scholar

Kafka, Ben. “Paperwork: The State of the Discipline.” Book History 12 (2009), 340–53.Google Scholar

Kagan, Richard. Clio and the Crown. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kägi, Ursula. Die Aufnahme der Reformation in den ostschweizerischen Untertanengebieten – der Weg Zürichs zu einem obrigkeitlichen Kirchenregiment bis zum Frühjahr 1529. Zurich: Juris-Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar

Keller, Hagen, “Vom ‘heiligen Buch’ zur ‘Buchführung’: Lebensfunktionen der Schrift im Mittelalter,” in Keller, Hagen, Grubmüller, Klaus, and Staubach, Nikolaus, eds., Pragmatische Schriftlichkeit im Mittelalter: Erscheinungsformen und Entwicklungsstufen, 1–31. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Keller, Hagen, and Behrmann, Thomas, eds. Kommunales Schriftgut in Oberitalien: Formen, Funktion, Überlieferung. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Keller, Hagen, Grubmüller, Klaus, and Staubach, Nikolaus, eds. Pragmatische Schriftlichkeit im Mittelalter: Erscheinungsformen und Entwicklungsstufen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald. Faces of History: Historical Inquiry from Herodotus to Herder. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald. The Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law and History in the French Renaissance. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald. Versions of History from Antiquity to the Enlightenment, 1450–1800. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ketelaar, Eric. “The Archival Image.” American Archivist 58, 4 (1995), 454–6.Google Scholar

Ketelaar, Eric. “Archival Turns and Returns,” in Gilliland, Anne J., McKemmish, Sue, and Lau, Andrew J., eds., Research in the Archival Multiverse, 228–68. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

Ketelaar, Eric. “The Difference Best Postponed? Cultures and Comparative Archival Science.” Archivaria 44 (1997), 142–48.Google Scholar

Ketelaar, Eric. “Jan van Houts ‘Registratuer’.” Nederlands Archievenblad 84 (1980), 400–12.Google Scholar

Ketelaar, Eric. “Records Out and Archives In: Early Modern Cities as Creators of Records and as Communities of Archives.” Archival Science 10, 3 (2010), 201–10.Google Scholar

Klinkenborg, Melle. Geschichte des Geheimen Staatsarchivs vom 15. bis zum 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Kloosterhuis, Jürgen. Berlin: Geheimes Staatsarchiv, 2011.Google Scholar

Kloosterhius, Jürgen. “In arduis solertia et fides,” in Kloosterhius, Jürgen, ed., Archivarbeit für Preußen, 421–2. Berlin: Geheimes Staatsarchiv, 2000.Google Scholar

Kloosterhius, Jürgen. “Mittelalterliche Amtsbücher, Strukturen und Materien,” in Beck, Friedrich and Henning, Eckart, eds., Die archivalischen Quellen, 4th ed., 53–73. Stuttgart: UTB, 2004.Google Scholar

Kloosterhius, Jürgen. “Von der Repositurenvielfalt zur Archiveinheit: Die Etappen der Tektonierung des Geheimen Staatsarchivs,” in Kloosterhius, Jürgen, ed., Archivarbeit für Preußen, 47–70. Berlin: Geheimes Staatsarchiv, 2000.Google Scholar

Koch, Petra. “Die Archivierung kommunaler Bücher in den ober- und mittelitalienischen Städten im 13. und frühen 14. Jahrhundert,” in Keller, Hagen and Behrmann, Thomas, eds., Kommunales Schriftgut in Oberitalien: Formen, Funktion, Überlieferung, 19–70. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Kögl, Werner. “Die Bedeutung des Wilhelm Putsch für die Organisation des Archivwesens unter Ferdinand I.” Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs 28 (1975), 197–209.Google Scholar

Kos, Miklo. “Carte sine litteris.” Mitteilungen des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 62 (1954), 97–100.Google Scholar

Kosto, Adam. Making Agreements in Medieval Catalonia: Power, Order and the Written Word, 1000–1200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Kosto, Adam. “‘Statim invenire ante’: Finding aids and research tools in pre-Scholastic legal and administrative manuscripts.” Scriptorium 70, 2 (2016), 285–309.Google Scholar

Kosto, Adam, and Winroth, Anders, eds. Charters, Cartularies and Archives: The Preservation and Transmission of Documents in the Medieval West. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2002.Google Scholar

Koziol, Geoffrey. The Politics of Memory and Identity in Carolingian Royal Diplomas: The West Frankish Kingdom 840–987. Turnhout: Brepols, 2012.Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, tr. Krapp, Peter. Paper Machines: About Cards & Catalogs, 1548–1929. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011 [German original 2002].Google Scholar

Kuchenbuch, Ludolf, and Kleine, Uta, eds. ‘Textus’ im Mittelalter: Komponenten und Situationen des Wortgebrauchs im schriftsemantischen Feld. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 2006.Google Scholar

Lambert, Malcolm. Medieval Heresy: Popular Movements from the Gregorian Reform to the Reformation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

La Roi Ladurie, Emmanuel. Montaillou: The Promised Land of Error. New York: Vintage Books, 1979.Google Scholar

Lazzarini, Isabella. “Records, Politics and Diplomacy: Secretaries and Chanceries in Renaissance Italy (1350–c. 1520),” in Dover, Paul, ed., Secretaries and Statecraft in the Early Modern World, 16–36. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Joachim. “Registraturgeschichtliche und quellenkundliche Aspekte älterer Kanzleiregister.” Archivmitteilungen 26, 1 (1976), 13–18.Google Scholar

Leonardi, Claudio, Morelli, Marcello, and Santi, Francesco, eds. Fabula in Tabula: Una storia degli indici del manoscritto al testo elettronico. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi Sull’alto Medievo, 1995.Google Scholar

Lepper, Marcel, and Raulff, Ulrich. “Erfindung des Archivs,” in Lepper, Marcel and Raulff, Ulrich, eds., Handbuch Archiv: Geschichte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven, 1–8. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar

Lepsius, Susanne, and Wettstein, Thomas, eds. Als die Welt in die Akten kam: Prozeßschriftgut im europäischen Mittelalter. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann, 2008.Google Scholar

Levillain, Léon. “Le ‘De re diplomatica,’” in Mélanges et Documents Publiés a l’Occasion du 2e Centenaire de la Mort de Mabillon, 195–252. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion, 1908.Google Scholar

Lewinski, Ludwig. Die Brandenburgische Kanzlei und das Urkundenwesen während der Regierung der beiden ersten Hohenzollerschen Markgrafen (1411–1470). Strasbourg: Heitz & Mündel, 1893.Google Scholar

Lodolini, Elio. “Giurisprudenza della Sacra Rota Romana in materia di archivi (secc. XIV–XVIII).” Rassegna degli archivi di stato 42 (1982), 7–33.Google Scholar

Lodolini, Elio. “The War of Independence of Archivists.” Archivaria 28 (1989), 36–47.Google Scholar

Lokke, Carl. “Archives and the French Revolution.” American Archivist 31, 1 (1968), 23–31.Google Scholar

Lowe, Raphael. The Medieval History of the Latin Vulgate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Lynker, Nicolai Christopher. De archivo imperii, reprinted in Wencker, Jacob, ed. Collecta archivi et cancellariae jura: quibus accedunt, de archicancellariis, vicecancellariis, cancellariis ac secretariis virorum clarissimorum commentationes, 82–109. Strasbourg: Jo. Reinholdi Dulssecker, 1715.Google Scholar

Maanen, Rudi van. Inventaris van het Stadsarchief van Leiden (1253) 1574–1816 (1897). Leiden: Gemeentearchief Leiden, 1986.Google Scholar

Mabillon, Jean. De re diplomatica libri VI. Paris: Billaine, 1681.Google Scholar

Mabillon, Jean. Librorum de re diplomatica supplementum. Paris: Charles Robustel, 1704 [Also included in the 1708 second edition of De re diplomatica libri VI].Google Scholar

Maissen, Thomas. Die Geburt der Republik: Staatsverständnis und Repräsentation in der frühneuzeitlichen Eidgenossenschaft. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.Google Scholar

Makleff, Ron. “Sovereignty and Silence: The Creation of a Myth of Archival Destruction, Liège, 1408.” Archive Journal, August 2017, www.archivejournal.net/essays/sovereignty-and-silence.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. The Sources of Social Power: Vol. 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Marchal, Guy P. “Das Meisterli von Emmenbrücke oder vom Aussagewert mündlicher Überlieferung: Eine Fallstudie zum Problem Willhelm Tell.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Geschichte 34, 4 (1984), 521–39.Google Scholar

Marques, A. H. de Oliveira, Portugal na Crise dos Séculos XIV e XV (Nova História De Portugal, vol. 4). Lisbon: Editorial Presença, 1987.Google Scholar

Martin, Henri-Jean, and Vezin, Jean, eds. Mise en page et mise en texte du livre manuscrit. Mayenne: Librarie-Promodis, 1990.Google Scholar

Mascardi, Giuseppe. Conclusiones probationum omnium, quae in vtroque foro versantur… Venice: Haeredes Damiani Zenarij, 1609.Google Scholar

McDonald, Terrence J., ed. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1996.Google Scholar

McKemmish, Sue. “Recordkeeping in the Continuum,” in Gilliland, Anne J., McKemmish, Sue, and Lau, Andrew J., eds., Research in the Archival Multiverse, 122–60. Clayton, Australia: Monash University Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

McKemmish, Sue, et al., eds. Archives: Recordkeeping and Society. Wagga Wagga: Center for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, 2005.Google Scholar

McKitterick, Rosalind. Charlemagne: The Formation of a European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

McNeely, Ian. The Emancipation of Writing: German Civil Society in the Making, 1790s–1820s. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar

McNeely, Ian F., and Wolverton, Lisa. Reinventing Knowledge from Alexandria to the Internet. New York/London: W. W. Norton, 2008.Google Scholar

Meier, Christel, Hüpper, Dagmar, and Keller, Hagen, eds. Der Codex im Gebrauch. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar

Meisner, Heinrich Otto. Aktenkunde: Ein Handbuch für Archivbenützer, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung Brandenburg-Preußens. Berlin: E. S. Mittler & Sohn, 1935.Google Scholar

Meisner, Heinrich Otto. Urkunden- und Aktenlehre der Neuzeit. Leipzig: Koehler & Amelang, 1950.Google Scholar

Menne, Mareike. “Confession, Confusion and Rule in a Box? Archival Accumulation in Northwestern Germany in the Age of Confessionalization.” Archival Science 10, 3 (2010), 299–314.Google Scholar

Merzbacher, Friedrich. “Ius Archivi: Zum geschichtlichen Archivrecht.” Archivalische Zeitschrift 75 (1979), 135–47.Google Scholar

Meyer, Bruno. “Die Durchsetzung eidgenössischen Rechts im Thurgau. Studien zum Verfassungsrecht der Eidgenossenschaft des 15. Jahrhunderts,” in Festgabe Hans Nabholz, 139–69. Aarau: Sauerländer, 1944.Google Scholar

Miller, Frederic. Arranging and Describing Archives and Manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 1990.Google Scholar

Miller, Peter. Peiresc’s Europe: Learning and Virtue in the Seventeenth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Miller, Thea “Action, Transaction, and Vorgang: Gaining New Insights from an Old Practice.” Archival Science 3, 4 (2003), 413–30.Google Scholar

Miller, Thea “The German Registry: The Emergence of a Recordkeeping Model.” Archival Science 3, 1 (2003), 43–63.Google Scholar

Milligan, Jennifer. “Making a Modern Archive: The Archives Nationales of France, 1850–1887.” PhD Dissertation, Rutgers University, 2002.Google Scholar

Milligan, Jennifer. “‘What Is an Archive?’ in Modern France,” in Burton, Antoinette, ed., Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions and the Writing of History, 159–83. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Moore, G.F. “The Vulgate Chapters and Numbered Verses in the Hebrew Bible.” Journal of Biblical Literature 12, 1 (1893), 73–78.Google Scholar

Moore, Lara Jennifer. Restoring Order: The Ecole des Chartes and the Organization of Archives and Libraries in France, 1820–1870. Duluth: Litwin, 2008.Google Scholar

Moore, R. I. The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950–1250. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar

Moore, R. I. The Origins of European Dissent. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Moraw, Peter. Von offener Verfassung zur gestalteter Verdichtung: Das Reich im späten Mittelalter 1250 bis 1490. Berlin: Propyläen Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar

Morelle, Laurent. “De l’original à la copie: Remarques sur l’evaluation des transcriptions dans les cartulaires médiévaux,” in Guyotjeannin, Olivier, Morelle, Laurent, and Parisse, Michel, eds., Les cartulaires: Actes de la Table ronde (Paris, 5–7 Decembre 1991), 91–104. Paris: École des Chartes, 1993.Google Scholar

Morsel, Joseph. “En Guise d’Introduction: les chartriers entre ‘retour aux sources’ et déconstruction des objects historiens,” in Contamine, Philippe and Vissière, Laurent, eds., Les chartriers seigneuriaux: défendre ses droits, construire sa mémoire, XIII^e–XXI^e siècle, 9–34. Geneva: Droz, 2010.Google Scholar

Müller, Ernst, and Posner, Ernst, Übersicht über die Bestände des Geheimen Staatsarchivs zu Berlin Dahlem: I. Hauptabteilung. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1934.Google Scholar

Müller, Philipp. “Die neue Geschichte aus dem alten Archiv: Geschichtsforschung und Arkanpolitik in Mitteleuropa, ca. 1800–1850.” Historische Zeitschrift 299, 1 (2014), 36–69.Google Scholar

Muller, Samuel, Feith, J. A., and Fruin, R., tr. Leavitt, Arthur H.. Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives. New York: H. W. Wilson, 1968 [Dutch original 1898].Google Scholar

Myler, Nicolaus. De principibus & statibus Imperii Rom. Germ. eorumvè praecipuis juribus succincta delineatio, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Johannes Wyrich Rösslin and Wilhelm Serlin, 1658.Google Scholar

Navarro Bonilla, Diego. Escritura, Poder y Archivo: la organización documental de la Diputación del Reino de Aragón (siglos XV–XVIII). Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias, 2004.Google Scholar

Navarro Bonilla, Diego. La imagen del archivo: representación y funciones en España (siglos XVI y XVII). Madrid: Trea, 2003.Google Scholar

Navarro Bonilla, Diego. “El Mundo Como Archivo y Representación: Símbolos e imagen de los poderes de la escritura.” Emblemata 14 (2008), 19–43.Google Scholar

Nicolaj, Giovanna. “Originale, authenticum, publicum: Una sciarada per il documento diplomatico,” in Kosto, Adam and Winroth, Anders, eds., Charters, Cartularies and Archives: The Preservation and Transmission of Documents in the Medieval West, 8–21. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 2002.Google Scholar

Nirenberg, David. “Review of Given, Inquisition.” Speculum 75, 1 (2000), 182–84.Google Scholar

Noflatscher, Heinz. Räte und Herrscher: Politische Eliten an den Habsburgerhöfen der österreichischen Länder 1480–1530. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern, 1999.Google Scholar

Nussdorfer, Laurie. Brokers of Public Trust: Notaries in Early Modern Rome. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Oberste, Jörg. Die Dokumente der klösterlichen Visitationen. Turnhout: Brepols, 1999.Google Scholar

Oberste, Jörg. “Normierung und Pragmatik des Schriftgebrauchs im cisterziensischen Visitationsverfahren bis zum beginnenden 14. Jahrhundert.” Historisches Jahrbuch 114 (1994), 312–48.Google Scholar

Oliver, Gillian. “Managing Records in Current Recordkeeping Environments,” in Eastwood, Terry and MacNeil, Heather, eds., Currents of Archival Thinking, 2nd ed., 83–106. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited, 2017.Google Scholar

Ong, Walter. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London/New York: Methuen, 1982.Google Scholar

O’Toole, James M. “Back to the Future: Ernst Posner’s Archives in the Ancient World.” American Archivist 67 (2004), 161–75.Google Scholar

Overvoorde, J. C., and Verburgt, J. W.. Archief der secretarie van de stad Leiden 1253–1575. Leiden: J. J. Groen & Zoon, 1937.Google Scholar

Pales-Gobilliard, Annette, ed. Le Livre des sentences de l’inquisiteur Bernard Gui, 1308–1323. Paris: CNRS, 2002.Google Scholar

Papenbroeck, Daniel. “Ad tomum II Aprilis propylaeum antiquarium circa veri ac falsi discrimen in vetustis membranis,” in Acta sanctorum Aprilis, Vol. 2: Quo medii XI dies continentur, i–lii. Antwerp: Michaelus Cnobarus, 1675.Google Scholar

Papritz, Johannes. Archivwissenschaft, 4 vols. Marburg: Archivschule Marburg, 1983.Google Scholar

Papritz, Johannes. “Neuzeitliche Methoden der archivischen Ordnung: Schriftgut vor 1800.” Archivum 14 (1964), 13–56.Google Scholar

Paravicini, Werner, and Werner, Karl Ferdinand, eds. Histoire Comparée de L’Administration (IV–XVIII Siecles). Munich: Artemis Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar

Parker, Geoffrey. Philip II, 3rd edition. Chicago: Open Court, 1995.Google Scholar

Parkes, Malcolm. “Folia librorum quaerere: Medieval experience of the problems of hypertext and the index,” in Leonardi, Claudi, Morelli, Marcello, and Santi, Francesco, eds., Fabula in Tabula: Una storia degli indici del manoscritto al testo elettronico, 23–41. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi Sull’alto Medievo, 1995.Google Scholar

Parkes, Malcolm. “The Influence of the Concepts of Ordinatio and Compilatio on the Development of the Book,” in Alexander, J. J. G. and Gibson, M. T., eds., Medieval Learning and Literature, 115–41. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Parkes, Malcolm. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Patze, Hans. “Die Herrschaftspraxis der deutschen Landesherren während des späten Mittelalters,” in Paravicini, Werner and Werner, Karl Ferdinand, eds., Histoire Comparée de L’Administration (IV–XVIII Siecles), 363–91. Munich: Artemis Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar

Pauser, Josef, Scheutz, Martin, and Winkelbauer, Thomas, eds. Quellenkunde der Habsburgermonarchie (16.-18. Jahrhundert). Ein exemplarisches Handbuch. Vienna/Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar

Pennings, J. C. M. “Geschiednis van het archiefbeheer,” in “Inventaris van het archief van de Verenigde Oost-Indiscche Compagnie (VOC), 1602–1795 (1812),” NLNA Inventories, 1.04.02.Google Scholar

Perry, Adele. “The Colonial Archive on Trial: Possession, Dispossession, and History in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia,” in Burton, Antoinette, ed., Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions and the Writing of History, 325–50. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pessanha, José. “Uma Rehabilitação historica: inventarios da Torre do Tombo no seculo XVI.” Archivo Historico Portuguez 3 (1905), 287–303.Google Scholar

Peters, Edward. Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe: Documents in Translation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Peters, Edward. Inquisition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Petersen, Stefan. “Die Hohe Registratur des Lorenz Fries: Ein Kanzleibehelf als Zeugnis effizienter Verwaltung,” in Fuchs, Franz et al., eds., Lorenz Fries und sein Werk, 269–93. Würzburg: Schöningh, 2014.Google Scholar

Pitz, Ernst. “Beiträge zur Geschichte des Ius Archivi.”Der Archivar 16 (1963), 279–86.Google Scholar

Pitz, Ernst. “Diplom und Registereintrag: Über normative und prozessuale Interpretation von Papst- und Königsurkunden und ihre Abhängigkeit von der Form der Überlieferung,” in Meier, Christel, Hüpper, Dagmar, and Keller, Hagen, eds., Der Codex im Gebrauch, 101–8. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar

Pitz, Ernst. Schrift- und Aktenwesen der städtischen Verwaltung im Spätmittelalter. Köln–Nürnberg–Lübeck. Cologne: Paul Neubner, 1959.Google Scholar

Pocock, J.G.A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Pocock, J.G.A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Popkewitz, Thomas, et al. “Debate–Discussion: The Cult of Facts, Romanticizing the Archive, and Ignoring Styles of Reasoning: Delusive Technologies of Conducting Historical Research [includes position paper and six short responses],” Bildungsgeschichte: International Journal for the Historiography of Education 8, 2 (2018), 192–220.Google Scholar

Portugal, Fernando. “A Chancelaria de D. Manuel.” Ethnos (Lisbon) 6 (1970), 261–70.Google Scholar

Portugal, Fernando. “Mapa dos anos representados em cada livro da chancelaria de D. Manuel.” Typed manuscript, Torre do Tombo (PDF provided to the author by Pedro Pinto).Google Scholar

Posner, Ernst. Archives in the Ancient World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Potin, Yann. “Archives en sacristie: Le trésor est-il un bâtiment d’archives? Le cas du ‘Trésor des chartes’ des rois de France (XIIIe–XIXe siècle).” Livraisons d’histoire de l’architecture 10, 2 (2005), 65–85.Google Scholar

Potin, Yann. “Entre trésor sacré et vaisselle du prince: Le roi médiéval est-il un collectionneur?” Hypothèses 2003, 1 (2003), 45–56.Google Scholar

Quantin, Jean-Louis. “Reason and Reasonableness in French Historical Scholarship.” Huntington Library Quarterly 74, 3 (2011), 401–436.Google Scholar

Quaritsch, Helmut. Souveränität. Entstehung und Entwicklung des Begriffs in Frankriech und Deutschland vom 13. Jahrhundert bis 1806. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1986.Google Scholar

Raible, Wolfgang. Die Semiotik der Textgestalt: Erscheinungsformen und Folgen eines kulturellen Evolutionsprozesses. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1991.Google Scholar

Ramingen, Jacob von. Der rechten künstlichen Renouatur/Eigentliche unnd gründtliche Beschreibung. Heidelberg: Carpentarius, 1571.Google Scholar

Ramingen, Jacob von. Summarischer Bericht/Wie es mit einer künstlichen und volkomnen Registratur Ein gestalt… Heidelberg: Johannes Mayer, 1571.Google Scholar

Ramingen, Jacob von. Von der Haushaltung der Regiment land und Leüt, und dann der ligenden Güter, und ihrer Rechten und Gniessen… Augsburg: Mattheus Franke, 1566.Google Scholar

Ramingen, Jacob von. Von der Registratur/Und ihen Gebäwen und Regimenten… Heidelberg: Johannes Maier, 1571.Google Scholar

Ranke, Leopold von. Zur Kritik neuerer Geschichtsschreiber. Leipzig: G. Reimer, 1824.Google Scholar

Rau, Virginia. A Tôrre do Tombo em 1631. Lisbon: Bertrand Irmaos, 1945.Google Scholar

Raumer, Georg Wilhelm von, ed. Henning, Eckart. “Geschichte des Geheimen Staats- und Cabinets-Archivs zu Berlin bis zum Jahre 1820.” Archivalische Zeitschrift 72 (1976), 30–75.Google Scholar

Rauschert, Jeanette. Herrschaft und Schrift: Strategien der Inszenierung und Funktionalisierung von Texten in Luzern und Bern am Ende des Mittelalters. Berlin/ New York: De Gruyter, 2006.Google Scholar

Reingrabner, Gustav. “Zur Rechtsgeschichte des Parochialsystems in der Reformationszeit.” Österreichisches Archiv für Kirchenrecht, 32, 1–2 (1981), 42–58.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, Fernanda. “Como seria a estrutura primitiva do Arquivo da Casa da Coroa (Torre do Tombo)?” Biblioteca Digital, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade do Porto, http://ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/1240.pdf.Google Scholar

Ridener, John. From Polders to Postmodernism: A Concise History of Archival Theory. Duluth: Litwin Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Riedmann, Josef. “Die Rechnungsbücher der Tiroler Landesfürsten,” in Silagi, Gabriel, ed., Landesherrliche Kanzleien im Spätmittelalter, 2: 315–23. Munich: Arebeo-Gesellschaft, 1984.Google Scholar

Rodríguez de Diego, José Luis. “Archivos del Poder, Archivos de la Administración, Archivos de la Historia (s. XVI–XVII),” in José Generelo, Juan and Moreno López, Ángeles, eds., Historia de los Archivos y de la Archivistica en España, 29–42. Valladolid: Secretario de Publicaciones y Intercambio Científico, Universidad de Valladolid, 1998.Google Scholar

Rodríguez de Diego, José Luis. “Estudio” in Rodríguez de Diego, José Luis, ed., Instrucción para el gobierno del Archivo de Simancas (Año 1588), 10–75. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, 1988.Google Scholar

Rodríguez de Diego, José Luis. ed. Instrucción para el gobierno del Archivo de Simancas (Año 1588). Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Cultura, 1988.Google Scholar

Rodríguez de Diego, José Luis. “La Formación del Archivo de Simancas en el Siglo XVI,” in Luisa López-Vidriero, María and Cátedra, Pedro M., eds., Coleccionismo y Bibliotecas (Siglos XV-XVIII), 519–57. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 1998.Google Scholar

Rodríguez de Diego, José Luis. “Significado del proyecto archivistico de Felipe II,” in Alvar Ezquerra, Alfredo, ed., Imágenes históricos de Felipe II, 183–96. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Cervantinos, 2000.Google Scholar

Rodríguez de Diego, José Luis, and Rodríguez de Diego, Julia. “Un archivo no solo para el rey: Significado social del proyecto simanquino en el siglo XVI,” in Millán, José Martínez, ed., Felipe II (1527–1598): Europa y la monarquía católica, 4: 463–75. Madrid: Parteluz, 1998.Google Scholar

Roe, Kathleen. Arranging and Describing Archives and Manuscripts (Archival Fundamentals Series II). Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2005.Google Scholar

Rosa, Maria de Lurdes. O morgadio em Portugal, séculos XIV–XV: Modelos e práticas de comportamento linhagístico. Lisbon: Estampa, 1995.Google Scholar

Rosa, Maria de Lurdes, and Head, Randolph C., eds. Rethinking the Archive in Pre-Modern Europe: Family Archives and Their Inventories from the 15th to 19th Century. Lisbon: Instituto de Estudos Medievais, 2015.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Daniel. “Introduction” (Special section on Information Overload). Journal of the History of Ideas 64, 1 (2003), 1–9.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Eduard. Die Behördenorganisation Kaiser Ferdinands I.: Das Vorbild der Verwaltungsorganisation in den deutschen Territorien: Ein Beitrag zu Geschichte des Verwaltungsrechts. Vienna: Carl Gerold’s Sohn, 1887.Google Scholar

Rouse, Richard, and Rouse, Mary. “Concordances et Index,” in Martin, Henri-Jean and Vezin, Jean, eds., Mise en page et mise en texte du livre manuscrit, 219–28. Mayenne: Librarie-Promodis, 1990.Google Scholar

Rouse, Richard, and Rouse, Mary. Preachers, Sermons and Florilegia: Studies on the Maniplus florum of Thomas of Ireland. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1979.Google Scholar

Rouse, Richard, and Rouse, Mary. “Statim Invenire: Schools, Preachers, and New Attitudes to the Page,” in Benson, Robert L. and Constable, Giles, eds., Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century, 201–25. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Rück, Peter. “Die Ordnung der herzoglich savoyischen Archive unter Amadeus VIII. (1398–1451).” Archivalische Zeitschrift 67 (1971), 11–101.Google Scholar

Rück, Peter. “Zur Diskussion um die Archivgeschichte: die Anfaenge des Archivwesens in der Schweiz (800–1400).” Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Schweizerischer Archivare 26 (1975), 3–40.Google Scholar

Ruland, Rutger. Tractatus de commissariis, et commissionibus camerae imperialis quadripartitus. Frankfurt a.M.: Ioannis Sauris, 1604.Google Scholar

Sabean, David W. “Peasant Voices and Bureaucratic Texts: Narrative Structure in Early Modern Protocols,” in Becker, Peter and Clark, William, eds., Little Tools of Knowledge: Historical Essays on Academic and Bureaucratic Practices, 67–93. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Sabean, David W. “Village Court Protocols and Memory,” in Schmidt, Heinrich, Holenstein, André, and Würgler, Andreas, eds., Gemeinde, Reformation und Widerstand. Festschrift für Peter Blickle zum 60. Geburtstag, 3–23. Tübingen: Bibliotheca Academica, 1998.Google Scholar

Saenger, Paul. “Benito Arias Montana and the Evolving Notion of Locus in Sixteenth-Century Printed Books.” Word & Image 17, 1–2 (2001), 119–37.Google Scholar

Saenger, Paul. “The Impact of the Early Printed Page on the History of Reading.” Bulletin du Bibliophile (1996), 2: 237–301.Google Scholar

Saenger, Paul. Space between Words: The Origins of Silent Reading. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Salat, Johannes. Reformationschronik 1517–1534, ed. Jörg, Ruth. Bern: Allgemeine Geschichtsforschende Gesellschaft, 1986.Google Scholar

Sancho Rayon, José, and de Zabalburu, Francisco, eds. “Índice de las Escrituras Reales que están en el Archivo de Simancas. Año de 1568,” in Colección de Documentos Ineditos para la Historia de España por el Marqués de la Fuensante del Valle, 81: 45–153. Madrid: Imprenta de Miguel Ginesta, 1883.Google Scholar

Sawilla, Jan Marco. Antiquarianismus, Hagiographie und Historie im 17. Jahrhundert: Zum Werk der Bollandisten, Ein wissenschaftshistorischer Versuch. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2009.Google Scholar

Saxer, Daniela. “Archival Objects in Motion: Historians’ Appropriation of Sources in Nineteenth-Century Austria and Switzerland.” Archival Science 10, 3 (2010), 315–31.Google Scholar

Saxer, Daniela. Die Schärfung des Quellenblicks: Forschungspraktiken in der Geschichtswissenschaft 1840–1914. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.Google Scholar

Schäfer, Udo. “Authentizität: Vom Siegel zur digitalen Signatur,” in Schäfer, Udo and Bickhoff, Nicole, eds., Archivierung elektronischer Unterlagen, 165–81. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1999.Google Scholar

Schäffler, August. “Die ‘hohe Registratur’ des Magister Lorenzen Fries.” Archiv des historischen Vereins von Unterfranken und Aschaffenburg 22, 1 (1874), 1–32.Google Scholar

Schäffler, August. “Die Urkunden und Archivalbände des hochstiftisch wirzburgischen Archives im 16. Jahrhundert.” Archivalische Zeitschrift 10 (1885), 141–57.Google Scholar

Schellenberg, Theodor R. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Schenk, Dietmar. “‘Archivmacht’ und geschichtliche Wahrheit,” in Hering, Rainer and Schenk, Dietmar, eds., Wie mächtig sind Archive?, 21–43. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Schenk, Dietmar. “Aufheben, was nicht vergessen werden darf”: Archive vom alten Europa bis zur digitalen Welt. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2013.Google Scholar

Scherzer, Walter. “Die Anfänge der Archive der Bischofe und des Domkapitels zu Würzburg.” Archivalische Zeitschrift 73 (1977), 21–40.Google Scholar

Schilter, Johannes. “Probatio per archivum,” in Wencker, Jacob, ed., Collecta archivi et cancellariae jura: quibus accedunt, de archicancellariis, vicecancellariis, cancellariis ac secretariis virorum clarissimorum commentationes, 50–52. Strasbourg: Jo. Reinholdi Dulssecker, 1715.Google Scholar

Schmid, Barbara. “Das Hausbuch als literarische Gattung: Die Aufzeichnungen Johann Heinrich Wasers (1600–1669) und die Zürcher Hausbuchüberlieferung.” Daphnis 34, 3/5 (2005), 603–56.Google Scholar

Schmid, Barbara. Schreiben für Status und Herrschaft: Deutsche Autobiographik in Spätmittelalter und früher Neuzeit. Zurich: Chronos, 2006.Google Scholar

Schmid, Regula. “Die Chronik im Archiv: Amtliche Geschichtsschreibung und ihr Gebrauchspotential im Spätmittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit.” Das Mittelalter 5 (2000), 115–38.Google Scholar

Schmid, Regula. “Fahnengeschichten: Erinnern in der spätmittelalterlichen Gemeinde.” Traverse (1999), 39–48.Google Scholar

Schmid, Regula. Geschichte im Dienst der Stadt: Amtliche Historie und Politik im Spätmittelalter. Zurich: Chronos, 2009.Google Scholar

Schulte, Petra. “Fides Publica: Die Dekonstruktion eines Forschungsbegriffes,” in Schulte, Petra, Mostert, Marco, and van Renswoude, Irene, eds., Strategies of Writing: Studies on Text and Trust in the Middle Ages, 15–36. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.Google Scholar

Schulte, Petra. “Notarial Documents,” in Arlinghaus, Franz-Josef et al., Transforming the Medieval World: Uses of Pragmatic Literacy in the Middle Ages, 197–238. Turnhout: Brepols, 2006.Google Scholar

Schulte, Petra. Scripturae publicae creditur: Das Vertrauen in Notariatsurkunden im kommunalen Italien des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar

Schulte, Petra, Mostert, Marco, and van Renswoude, Irene, eds. Strategies of Writing: Studies on Text and Trust in the Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.Google Scholar

Schulze, Winfried. “Die veränderte Bedeutung sozialer Konflikte im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert,” in Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, Der deutsche Bauernkrieg 1524–1526, 277–302. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1975.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Dietrich W. H. “Zwei gotische Archivschränke aus Zürich.” Mitteilungen der antiquarische Gesellschaft von Zürich 60 (1993), 81–9.Google Scholar

Schweizer, Paul. “Geschichte des Zürcher Staatsarchivs.” Neujahrsblatt zum Besten des Waisenhauses in Zürich 116 (1894), 2–40.Google Scholar

Seckendorff, Veit Ludwig von. Teutscher Fürsten-Stat. Frankfurt a.M.: Thomas Matthias Götz, 1660.Google Scholar

Senatore, Francesco. “Uno mundo de carta”: Forme e struttura dell’diplomazia sforzesca. Naples: Liguori, 1998.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Barbara J. A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Sickel, Theodor. Urkundenlehre: Lehre von den Urkunden der ersten Karolinger (751–840). Vienna: Carl Gerold’s Sohn, 1867.Google Scholar

Sickinger, James. Public Records and Archives in Classical Athens. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Silagi, Gabriel, ed. Landesherrliche Kanzleien im Spätmittelalter. Munich: Arebeo-Gesellschaft, 1984.Google Scholar

Silvestri, Alessandro. “Archives of the Mediterranean: Governance and Record-Keeping in the Crown of Aragon in the Long Fifteenth Century.” European Historical Quarterly 46, 3 (2016), 435–57.Google Scholar

Simonett, Jürg, and Sablonier, Roger, eds. Handbuch der Bündner Geschichte, Vol. 2: Frühe Neuzeit. Chur: Verlag Bündner Monatsblatt, 2000.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Vol. 2: The Age of Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Smith, Barry. “Document Acts,” in Konzelmann-Ziv, Anita and Schmid, Hans Bernhard, eds., Institutions, Emotions and Group Agents: Contributions to Social Ontology, 19–31. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar

Soll, Jacob. The Information Master: Jean-Baptiste Colbert’s Secret State Intelligence System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Soll, Jacob. The Reckoning: Financial Accountability and the Rise and Fall of Nations. New York: Basic Books, 2014.Google Scholar

Spangenberg, Hans. “Die Kanzleivermerke als Quelle verwaltungsgeschichtlicher Forschung.” Archiv für Urkundenforschung 10 (1928), 469–525.Google Scholar

Spohnholz, Jesse. The Convent of Wesel: The Event That Never Was and the Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Stadler, Peter. “Das Zeitalter der Gegenreformation,” in Handbuch der Schweizer Geschichte, 1: 571–672. Zurich: Berichthaus, 1972.Google Scholar

Starzer, Albert. Beiträge zur Geschichte der niederösterreichischen Statthalterei. Vienna: K. u. K. Niederösterreichische Statthalterei, 1887.Google Scholar

Steedman, Carolyn. Dust: The Archive and Cultural History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Stirnemann, Patricia. “L’Illustration du Cartulaire de Saint-Martin-Du-Canigou,” in Guyotjeannin, Olivier, Morelle, Laurent, and Parisse, Michel, eds., Les cartulaires: Actes de la Table ronde (Paris, 5–7 Decembre 1991), 171–78. Paris: École des Chartes, 1993.Google Scholar

Stock, Brian. The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Stock, Brian. “Schriftgebrauch und Rationalität im Mittelalter,” in Schluchter, Wolfgang, ed., Max Webers Sicht des okzidentalen Christentums, 165–83. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988.Google Scholar

Stockinger, Thomas. “Factualité historique, preuve juridique, autorité patristique: stratégies d’argumentation dans les controverses érudites en milieu ecclésiastique,” in Leclant, Jean et al., eds., Dom Jean Mabillon, figure majeure de l’Europe des lettres, 709–33. Paris: Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 2010.Google Scholar

Stoler, Laura Ann. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Stoler, Laura Ann. “Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance.” Archival Science 2 (2002), 87–109.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael. Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland, Vol. 1: Reichspublizistik und Policeywissenschaft 1600–1800. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1988.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael, ed. Hermann Conring (1606–1681): Beiträge zu Leben und Werk. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1983.Google Scholar

Stolz, Otto. “Archiv- und Registraturwesen der oberösterreichischen (tirolisch-schwäbischen) Regierung im 16. Jahrhundert.” Archivalische Zeitschrift 42/43 (1934), 81–136.Google Scholar

Stolz, Otto. Geschichte und Bestände des Staatlichen Archives zu Innsbruck. Vienna: Adolf Holzhausens Nachfolger, 1938.Google Scholar

Stösser, Heinrich. Der Gachnanger Handel 1610. Ein Beitrag zur Religionspolitik der Eidgenossenschaft. Villingen im Schwarzwald: Müller Druck, 1965.Google Scholar

Stowasser, Otto H. “Das Archiv der Herzöge von Österreich.” Mitteilungen des Archivrates 3, 1 (1919), 15–62.Google Scholar

Stowasser, Otto H. “Die österreichischen Kanzleibücher vornehmlich des 14. Jahrhunderts und das Aufkommen der Kanzleivermerke.” Mitteilungen des österreichischen Instituts für Geschichtsforschung 35 (1914), 688–724.Google Scholar

Straub, Conrad. Rechtsgeschichte der Evangelischen Kirchgemeinden der Landschaft Thurgau unter den eidgenössischen Landfrieden (1529–1792). Frauenfeld: Huber, 1902.Google Scholar

Strauss, Gerald. Law, Resistance and the State: The Opposition to Roman Law in Reformation Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Strickler, Johannes, ed. Actensammlung zur Schweizerischen Reformationsgeschichte in den Jahren 1521–1532. Zurich: Meyer & Zeller, 1881.Google Scholar

Tanzini, Lorenzo. “Archives and the management of public records in 14th-century Florence.” Paper delivered at conference on “Politics and the Archives, Politics of the Archives,” June 10, 2013, at Birkbeck College, University of London.Google Scholar

Tanzini, Lorenzo. “Pratiche guidizarie e documentazione nello Stato fiorentino tra Tre e Quattrocento,” in Giorgio, Andrea, Moscadelli, Stefano and Zarilli, Carla, eds., La documentazione degli organii guidiziari nell’Italia tardo-medievale e moderno, 785–832. Rome: Archivi di Stato, 2012.Google Scholar

Tennant, Elaine. The Habsburg Chancellery Language in Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Tessier, Georges. “L’enregistrement.” Moyen Age 62 (1956), 39–52.Google Scholar

Teuscher, Simon. “Document Collections, Mobilized Regulations, and the Making of Customary Law at the End of the Middle Ages.” Archival Science 10 (2010), 211–29.Google Scholar

Teuscher, Simon. “Kompilation und Mündlichkeit: Herrschaftskultur und Gebrauch von Weistümern im Raum Zürich (14.–15. Jahrhundert).” Historische Zeitschrift 273, 2 (2001), 289–333.Google Scholar

Teuscher, Simon. tr. Grace, Philip. Lords’ Rights and Peasant Stories: Writing and the Formation of Tradition in the Later Middle Ages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 2012 [German original 2007].Google Scholar

Teuscher, Simon. tr. Grace, Philip. “Textualising Peasant Inquiries: German Weistümer between Orality and Literacy,” in Heidecker, Karl, ed., Charters and the Use of the Written Word in Medieval Society, 239–53. Turnhout: Brepols, 2000.Google Scholar

Thomas, David, Fowler, Simon, and Johnson, Valerie. The Silence of the Archive. Chicago: Neal Schuman, 2017.Google Scholar

Tock, Benoît-Michel. “Les Textes Non Diplomatiques dans les cartulaires de la province de Reims,” in Guyotjeannin, Olivier, Morelle, Laurent, and Parisse, Michel, eds., Les cartulaires: Actes de la Table ronde (Paris, 5–7 Decembre 1991), 45–58. Paris: École des Chartes, 1993.Google Scholar

Troulliot, Michael. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Trusen, Winfried. “Vom Inquisitionsverfahren zum Ketzer- und Hexenprozeß,” in Schwab, Dieter, ed., Staat, Kirche, Wissenschaft in einer pluralistischen Gesellschaft: Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Paul Mikat, 435–50. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1989.Google Scholar

Van Caenegem, R. C. “Methods of Proof in Western Medieval Law,” in Van Caenegem, R. C., Legal History: A European Perspective, 71–114. London: Hambledon Press, 1991 [Original publication 1965].Google Scholar

Vismann, Cornielia, tr. Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey. Files: Law and Media Technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008. [German original 2000].Google Scholar

Vogtherr, Thomas. “Archivtheorie und Archivpraxis im ausgehenden 17. Jahrhundert: Ahasver Fritsch, Jacob Bernhard Multz von Oberschönfeld, und Georg Aebbtlin,” in Cunz, Reiner, ed., Fundamenta Historiae: Geschichte im Spiegel der Numismatik und ihrer Nachbarwissenschaften, 403–9. Hannover: Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, 2004.Google Scholar

Völkel, Markus. “Pyrrhonisumus historicus” und “fides historica”: Die Entwicklung der deutschen historischen Methodologie unter dem Gesichtspunkt der historischen Skepsis. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, 1987.Google Scholar

Wagner, Kurt. Das Brandenburgische Kanzlei- und Urkundenwesen zur Zeit des Kurfürsten Albrecht Achilles (1470–86): Einleitung und Exkurs I. and II. Berlin: Blanke, 1911.Google Scholar

Walder, Ernst, ed. Religionsvergleiche des 16. Jahrhunderts. Bern: H. Lang, 1945.Google Scholar

Walsham, Alexandra. “The Social History of the Archive: Record-Keeping in Early Modern Europe.” Past and Present Supplement 11 (2016), 10–48.Google Scholar

Walther, Andreas. “Kanzleiordnungen Maximilians I., Karls V. und Ferdinands. I.” Archiv für Urkundenforschung 2 (1909), 335–406.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. “Politics as a Vocation,” in Gerth, Hans and Mills, C. Wright, ed. and tr., From Max Weber, 77–127. New York: Free Press, 1946.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. ed. and tr. Gerth, Hans and Yang, C. K.. The Religion of China. New York: Free Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Weber, Wolfgang. Prudentia gubernatoria. Studien zur Herrschaftslehre in der deutschen politischen Wissenschaft des 17. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Weijers, Olga. “Les Index au Moyen Âge: Sont-ils un Genre Littéraire?”, in Claudi, Leonardi, Morelli, Marcello, and Santi, Francesco, eds., Fabula in Tabula: Una storia degli indici del manoscritto al testo elettronico, 11–22. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi Sull’alto Medievo, 1995.Google Scholar

Wencker, Jacob, ed. Apparatus & instructus archivorum ex usu nostri temporis. Strasbourg: Jo. Reinholdi Dulssecker, 1713.Google Scholar

Wencker, Jacob, ed. Collecta archivi et cancellariae jura: quibus accedunt, de archicancellariis, vicecancellariis, cancellariis ac secretariis virorum clarissimorum commentationes. Strasbourg: Jo. Reinholdi Dulssecker, 1715.Google Scholar

Wiesflecker, Angelika. “Die ‘oberösterreichischen’ Kammerraitbücher zu Innsbruck 1493–1519: Ein Beitrag zur Wirtschafts-, Finanz- und Kulturgeschichte der oberösterreichischen Ländergruppe.” PhD Dissertation, Graz, 1986.Google Scholar

Wild, Joachim. Beiträge zur Registerführung der bayrischen Klöster und Hochstifte im Mittelalter. Kallmünz: Verlag Michael Laßleben, 1973.Google Scholar

Willett, Robert A. The Probative Value of Documents in Ecclesiastical Trials (De Fide Instrumentorum): An Historical Synopsis and Commentary. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Williams, Caroline. “Diplomatic Attitudes: From Mabillon to Metadata.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 26, 1 (2005), 1–24.Google Scholar

Woolf, D. R. “A High Road to the Archives? Rewriting the History of Early Modern English Historical Culture.” Storia della Storiographia 32 (1997), 33–59.Google Scholar

Yakel, Elizabeth. “Archival Representation,” in Blouin, Francis X. Jr., and Rosenberg, William G., eds., Archives, Documentation and the Institutions of Social Memory, 151–63. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Yale, Elizabeth. “The History of Archives: The State of the Discipline.” Book History 18 (2015), 332–59.Google Scholar

Yeo, Geoffrey. “Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information and Persistent Representations.” American Archivist 70 (2007), 315–43.Google Scholar

Yeo, Geoffrey. “Continuing Debates about Description,” in Eastwood, Terry and MacNeil, Heather, eds., Currents of Archival Thinking, 2nd ed., 163–92. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited, 2017.Google Scholar

Yeo, Geoffrey. Records, Information and Data: Exploring the Role of Record-Keeping in an Information Culture. London: Facet Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar

Zedelmaier, Helmut. Der Anfang der Geschichte: Studien zur Ursprungsdebatte im 18. Jahrhundert. Hamburg: Meiner, 2003.Google Scholar

Zedelmaier, Helmut. “Facilitas inveniendi: The Alphabetical Index as a Knowledge Management Tool.” Indexer 25, 4 (2007), 235–42.Google Scholar

Z’Graggen, Bruno. Tyrannenmord im Toggenburg. Fürstäbtische Herrschaft und protestantischer Widerstand um 1600. Zurich: Chronos, 1999.Google Scholar

Zins, Chaim. “Conceptual Approaches for Defining Data, Information and Knowledge.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 4 (2007), 479–93.Google Scholar