Define the Panic of 1837. The most recent editions of textbooks vary in their answers.

Chronology is far from consistent. Dates for the beginning of panic range from “late 1836” through the May 1837 bank suspensions. In some textbooks, there is no panic at all because when Van Buren took office, he “was immediately faced with a catastrophic depression.” Or, as another puts it, “no sooner was Van Buren in office than a severe depression, called the Panic of 1837, struck.” The dates for the end of the Panic of 1837 are equally varied. One text argues, “The panic of 1837 subsided by 1838.” Another asserts, “credit continued to collapse through 1838 and 1839.” A third extends the panic further, echoing generations of political history by claiming, “The Panic of 1837 lasted six long years.”

Finding a uniform answer to the question of the panic’s cause provesequally problematic. Some textbooks clearly blame domestic policies.8Others cite foreign, especially British, causes. Some textbooks performintricate narrative maneuvers so that they can blame both foreign anddomestic causes. Others end up blaming both without seeminglymeaning to do so. For example, one textbook first argues, “theDemocrats bore no direct responsibility for the economic downturn”; onthe next page, however, this same text claims, “the Specie Circular contributedto the Panic of 1837.” Other textbooks try to avoid this issueby relocating blame to impersonal and ahistorical economic forces. Onetext employs the adjective “inevitable” to describe the “cycle” in 1837;another describes Jackson’s effect on “the swings of the economicpendulum.”