Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T10:47:59.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Division of Household Labor across Time and Generations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Marsha Garrison
Affiliation:
Brooklyn Law School
Elizabeth S. Scott
Affiliation:
Columbia University Law School
Get access

Summary

GENDERED DIVISION OF HOUSEHOLD LABOR: ITS PERSISTENCE AND ITS EFFECT ON RELATIONAL STABILITY

When my parents married after World War II, neither was specialized, except by biology, for the marital and parental roles they would assume. My mother, who had a PhD in physics, could not cook anything except fudge. Other people had always cleaned for her and done her laundry. My father, a college graduate working for a family business, had also led a privileged life. He had never lived away from the structure provided by parents, college dormitory, and the U.S. Army. While he knew a fair amount about early forms of radar, he had never fixed up a house, rebuilt an engine, or mowed a lawn.

Nonetheless, because of the period and the area in which my parents settled (Milwaukee, never a hotbed of liberalism), they quickly developed a highly gendered division of household tasks. My mother did not work outside the home except, for a couple of years, as an adjunct professor. She did learn to cook (badly, except for party foods) and was in charge of delegating the cooking, cleaning, laundry, and grocery shopping. Even the children's chores were gendered. My jobs, when I was old enough to have them, were setting the table, clearing up, and doing dishes. My younger brothers’ jobs involved raking leaves, mowing the lawn (with ever fancier riding mowers), and shoveling snow. I wasn't supposed to touch my father's tools; my brothers were encouraged to saw and hammer and solder.

Type
Chapter
Information
Marriage at the Crossroads
Law, Policy, and the Brave New World of Twenty-First-Century Families
, pp. 54 - 72
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G.A.Yellen, J.L.Katz, M.L 1997 An Analysis of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in the United StatesQuarterly Journal of Economics, 9 277Google Scholar
Allen, D.W. 1992 What Does She See in Him? The Effect of Sharing on the Choice of SpouseEconomic Inquiry, 3 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artis, J.E.Pavalko, E.K. 2003 Explaining the Decline in Women's Household Labor: Individual Change and Cohort DifferencesJournal of Marriage and Family, 65 746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1973 A Theory of Marriage, Part IThe Journal of Political Economy 81 813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1974 A Theory of Marriage, Part IIThe Journal of Political Economy 82 S11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1975 Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Specific Reference to EducationNew YorkColumbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1991 A Treatise on the FamilyCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S.Landes, E.M.Michael, R.T. 1977 An Economic Analysis of Marital InstabilityJournal of Political Economy, 85 1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, T.Bagnoli, M. 1993 Courtship as a Waiting GameJournal of Political Economy, 101 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berardo, D.H.Shehan, C.L.Leslie, G. 1987 A Residue of Tradition: Jobs, Careers, and Spouses' Time in HouseworkJournal of Marriage and Family, 49 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, S.F. 1985 The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American HouseholdsNew YorkBarnes & NobleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, J. 1982 The Future of MarriageNew Haven, CTYale University PressGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, S.M. 2000 Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household LaborSocial Forces, 79 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biernat, M.Wortman, C.B. 1991 Sharing of Home Responsibilities between Professionally Employed Women and Their HusbandsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 844CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blau, F.D.Ferber, M.A.Winkler, A.E. 1998 The Economics of Women, Men and WorkUpper Saddle River, NJPrentice HallGoogle Scholar
Brinig, M.F. 1993 A Comment on Jana Singer's Alimony and EfficiencyGeorgetown Law Journal, 82 2461Google Scholar
Brinig, M.F. 1998 Equality and Sharing: Views of Households Across the Iron CurtainEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 7 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinig, M.F. 2000 From Contract to Covenant: Beyond the Law and Economics of the FamilyCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Brinig, M.F. 2010 Family, Law, and Community: Supporting the CovenantChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinig, M.F.Alexeev, M.V. 1995 Fraud in Courtship: Annulment and DivorceEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 2 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinig, M.F.Allen, D.W. 2000 These Boots Are Made for Walking”: Why Most Divorce Filers Are WomenAmerican Law and Economics Review, 2 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinig, M.F.Carbone, J. 1988 The Reliance Interest in Marriage and DivorceTulane Law Review, 62 855Google Scholar
Bryan, P.E. 1992 Killing Us Softly: Divorce Mediation and the Politics of PowerBuffalo Law Review, 40 441Google Scholar
Bryson, R.B.Bryson, J.B.Licht, M.H.Licht, B.G. 1976 The Professional Pair: Husband and Wife PsychologistsAmerican Psychologist, 31 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics 2009 http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2009/jan/wk1/art05.htm
Bureau of Labor Statistics 2009 http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/print.pl/opub/ted/2009/ted_20091009.htm
Chiswick, C.U.Lehrer, E.L. 1990 On Marriage-Specific Human Capital: Its Role as a Determinant of RemarriageJournal of Population Economics, 3 193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciabattari, T. 2004 Cohabitation and Housework: The Effects of Marital IntentionsJournal of Marriage and Family, 66 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claffey, S.T.Mickelson, K.R. 2009 Equity but Not Equality: Commentary on LaChance-Grzela and BouchardSex Roles, 60 819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. 1987 Marriage, Divorce and Quasi-Rents: Or “I Gave Him the Best Years of My LifeJournal of Legal Studies, 16 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, M.T. 1991 The Division of Household Labor: Suggestions for Future Empirical Consideration and Theoretical DevelopmentBlumberg, R.L.Gender, Family, and Economy: The Triple OverlapNewbury Park, CASage Publications IncGoogle Scholar
Coverman, S. 1985 Explaining Husbands' Participation in Domestic LaborSociological Quarterly, 26 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, M. 2001 Parental Influences on the Gendered Division of HouseworkAmerican Sociological Review, 66 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czapanskiy, K. 1991 Volunteers and Draftees: The Struggle for Parental EqualityUniversity of California-Los Angeles Law Review, 38 1415Google Scholar
Duncan, B.Duncan, O.D. 1978 Sex Typing and Social Roles: A Research ReportNew YorkAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
Engel, M. 1999 Pockets of Poverty: The Second Wives Club – Examining the Financial [In]Security of Women in RemarriagesWilliam and Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 5 309Google Scholar
England, P.Farkas, G. 1986 Households, Employment and Gender: A Social, Economic and Demographic ViewNew YorkAldine de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Erickson, R.J. 2005 Why Emotion Work Matters: Sex, Gender, and the Division of Household LaborJournal of Marriage and Family, 67 337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, M.M. 1991 The Gender Division of Labor in Two-Earner MarriagesJournal of Family Issues, 12 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, M.A. 1991 The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce ReformChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Glendon, M.A. 1985 The New Family and the New PropertyNew YorkButterworth'sGoogle Scholar
Goldscheider, F.K.Waite, L.J. 1991 New Families, No Families? The Transformation of the American HomeBerkeleyUniversity of California PressGoogle Scholar
Gronau, R. 1980 Home Production – A Forgotten IndustryReview of Economics and Statistics, 62 408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossbard-Shechtman, S. 1993 On the Economics of Marriage: A Theory of Marriage, Labor, and DivorceBoulder, COWestview PressGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S 1999 The Effects of Transitions in Marital Status on Men's Performance of HouseworkJournal of Marriage and Family, 61 700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, L. 1980 Role-Sharing Couples: A Study of Egalitarian MarriagesFamily Relations, 29 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, G.K. 1999 A Coordination Model of Sexual Division of LaborJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 40 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, H.I. 1981 The Family as the Locus of Gender, Class, and Political Struggle: The Example of HouseworkJournal of Women, Culture and Society, 6 366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, J.C. 1983 Becoming a Two-Job FamilyNew YorkPraegerGoogle Scholar
Knudson, K.Waerness, K. 2008 National Context and Spouses’ Housework in 34 CountriesEuropean Sociological Review, 24 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurdek, L.A. 2007 The Allocation of Household Labor by Partners in Gay and Lesbian CouplesJournal of Family Issues, 28 132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachance-Grzela, M.Bouchard, G. 2010 Why Do Women Do the Lion's Share of Housework? A Decade of ResearchSex Roles, 63 767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, E.M. 1978 The Economics of AlimonyJournal of Legal Studies, 7 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S.Smithson, J. 2007 Gender, Parenthood and the Changing European Workplace: Young Adults Negotiating the Work-Family BoundaryEuropean Commission Community Researchhttp://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/90882381EN6.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, , S.J.Pollak, , R.A. 1984 Noncooperative Bargaining Models of MarriageAmerican Economic Review, 84 132Google Scholar
Lundberg, S.J.Pollak, R.A. 1993 Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage MarketJournal of Political Economy, 101 988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, N.G. 2008 Principles of EconomicsFlorence, KYSouth-Western College PublishersGoogle Scholar
Mannino, C.A.Deutsch, F.M. 2007 Changing the Division of Household Labor: A Negotiated Process between PartnersSex Roles, 56 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, M.Adams, D. 2007 http://www.prb.org/Articles/2007/CrossoverinFemaleMaleCollegeEnrollmentRates.aspx
Model, S. 1982 Housework by Husbands: Determinants and ImplicationsAldous, J.Two Paychecks: Life in Dual-Earner FamiliesNewbury Park, CASage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Nock, S.L. 1999 Marriage in Men's LivesOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nock, S.L. 2000 Time and Gender in MarriageVirginia Law Review, 86 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nock, S.L.Brinig, M.F. 2002 Weak Men and Disorderly Women”: Divorce and the Division of LaborDnes, A.WRowthorn, RThe Law and Economics of Marriage and Divorce171CambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nock, S.L.Sanchez, L.A.Wright, J.D. 2008 Covenant Marriage: The Movement to Reclaim Tradition in AmericaNew Brunswick, NJRutgers University PressGoogle Scholar
Parkman, A.M. 1992 No-fault Divorce: What Went Wrong?Boulder, COWestview PressGoogle Scholar
Parkman, A.M. 1999 Bringing Consistency to the Financial Arrangements at DivorceKentucky Law Journal 87 51Google Scholar
Peters, H.E. 1986 Marriage and Divorce: Informational Constraints and Private ContractingAmerican Economic Review, 76 437Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1817 On the Principles of Political Economy and TaxationLondonJohn MurrayGoogle Scholar
Ross, C.E. 1987 The Division of Labor at HomeSocial Forces, 65 816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A. 1977 A Biosocial Perspective on ParentingDaedalus, 106 1Google ScholarPubMed
Sayer, L.C.Bianchi, S.M.Robinson, J.P. 2004 Are Parents Investing Less in Children? Trends in Mothers’ and Fathers’ Time with ChildrenAmerican Journal of Sociology, 110 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, V.Yarbrough, M. 2011 http://weblaw.usc.edu/who/faculty/workshops/documents/Schultz.pdf
Sessums, M.A. 1989 What Are Wives’ Contributions Worth upon Divorce?: Toward Fully Incorporating Partnership into Equitable DistributionUniversity of Florida Law Review, 41 987Google Scholar
Shelton, B.A. 1992 Women, Men and Time: Gender Differences in Paid Work, Housework and LeisureSanta Barbara, CAGreenwood PressGoogle Scholar
Shelton, B.A.John, D. 1993 Does Marital Status Make a Difference? Housework Among Married and Cohabiting Men and WomenJournal of Family Issues, 14 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. 1990 The Partnership Theory of Marriage: A Borrowed Solution FailsTexas Law Review, 68 689Google Scholar
South, S.J.Spitze, G. 1994 Housework in Marital and Nonmarital HouseholdsAmerican Sociological Review, 59 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain, D.G.Bianchi, S.M. 1996 Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage and Employment among American WomenNew YorkRussell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
Starnes, C.L. 1993 Divorce and the Displaced Homemaker: A Discourse on Playing with Dolls, Partnership Buyouts and Dissociation Under No-FaultUniversity of Chicago Law Review, 60 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, J.A.Bumpass, L.L. 2002 The National Survey of Families and Households – Waves 1, 2, and 3: Data Description and DocumentationCenter for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madisonhttp://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/home.htmGoogle Scholar
United States Bureau of the Census 2010
Vanek, J. 1980 Household Work, Wage Work, and Sexual EqualityBerk, S.F.Women and Household LaborNewbury Park, CASage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Wax, A.L. 1992 Bargaining in the Shadow of the Market: Is There a Future for Egalitarian Marriage?Virginia Law Review, 84 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Y.Willis, R.J. 1985 Children as Collective Goods and Divorce SettlementsJournal of Labor Economics 3 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, W.B. 2004 Soft Patriarchs, New Men: How Christianity Shapes Fathers and HusbandsChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.C. 1991 Gender Wars: Selfless Women in the Republic of ChoiceNew York University Law Review, 66 1559Google Scholar
Williams, J.C. 1996 Restructuring Work and Family Entitlements Around Family ValuesHarvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 19 753Google Scholar
Williams, J.C. 1998 Toward a Reconstructive Feminism: Reconstructing the Relationship of Market Work and Family WorkNorthern Illinois University Law Review, 19 89Google Scholar
Williams, J.C. 2000 UnBending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About ItOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.C. 2001 From Difference to Dominance to Domesticity: Care as Work, Gender as TraditionChicago-Kent Law Review, 76 1441Google Scholar
Yogev, S. 1981 Do Professional Women Have Egalitarian Marital Relationships?Journal of Marriage and Family, 43 865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B.Borzel, Y. 1984 Effect of the Utilization Rate on the Division of LaborEconomic Inquiry, 22 18Google Scholar
Zelder, M. 1993 Inefficient Dissolutions as a Consequence of Public Goods: The Case of No-Fault DivorceJournal of Legal Studies, 22 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×